Tuesday, 2018-05-29

*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm01:02
*** edmondsw has quit IRC01:07
*** adreznec has quit IRC02:44
*** adreznec has joined #openstack-powervm02:45
*** tonyb has quit IRC02:46
*** tonyb has joined #openstack-powervm02:47
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm02:51
*** edmondsw has quit IRC02:55
*** chhagarw has joined #openstack-powervm05:29
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm07:46
*** edmondsw_ has joined #openstack-powervm12:11
*** Alexey_Abashkin has joined #openstack-powervm12:33
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC12:36
*** Alexey_Abashkin is now known as AlexeyAbashkin12:36
*** efried has joined #openstack-powervm12:46
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm13:06
*** esberglu has quit IRC13:20
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm13:30
*** edmondsw_ is now known as edmondsw13:42
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm13:44
*** mujahidali has joined #openstack-powervm13:54
edmondsw#startmeeting PowerVM Driver Meeting14:01
openstackMeeting started Tue May 29 14:01:19 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is edmondsw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting'14:01
edmondsw#link agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_driver_meeting_agenda14:01
edmondsw#topic In-Tree Driver14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "In-Tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:01
edmondswpinging esberglu efried gman_tx mdrabe mujahidali14:02
esbergluvSCSI is out of the runway. Unfortunate that our runway slot was during the summit / memorial day14:02
edmondswthat counted?14:03
edmondswthat's some feedback on the runway process... PTG and summit weeks should not count14:03
edmondswefried ^14:03
esbergluBut all issues have been addressed and CI is passing, so I'm not worried about getting it in14:03
efriedYeah, there was some chatter about dispensations for summit week.  Guess that didn't fly.14:04
edmondswyeah, in a runway or not, we should ask mriedem and melwitt to take a look and confirm their issues are addressed14:04
*** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm14:05
esbergluI won't be able to do any more in-tree work this release (resize/mig) so that will probably slide until next release14:05
edmondswesberglu understood14:05
esbergluAnd we don't have CI yet for that anyways14:05
edmondswesberglu I'm hoping you'll still be able to finish the CI work for that14:05
edmondswbut we can talk about that when we get to CI14:05
edmondswI'm not giving up yet on some of the resize/mig work getting in if we can get CI done14:06
edmondswmaybe efried or I can pick that up (the porting, not CI)14:06
esbergluThat's all I have for in-tree14:06
edmondswoh, forgot to link14:07
edmondsw#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-in-tree-todos14:07
edmondsw#topic Out-of-Tree Driver14:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Out-of-Tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:07
edmondsw#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-oot-todos14:07
edmondswchhagarw gman-tx can one of you update us on iSCSI?14:08
edmondswI think we're waiting on DevStack testing for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567575/14:08
edmondswI know chhagarw was trying to set that up last week and had some issues14:09
edmondswesberglu I pointed her to you for help... did that happen?14:09
esbergluYeah she's had bad luck and hit about every issue I know stacking, still working on it today14:10
edmondswalright tx14:10
edmondswI talked to efried about what we need to do for MSP support14:11
edmondswand we've got some patches in flight related to tox configs14:12
edmondswand lower constraints jobs14:12
edmondswwe've been testing networking-powervm against a queens neutron release instead of master, which I'm trying to fix14:12
edmondswanother thing that I don't think I've mentioned here before is that not that we have things official with PowerVMStackers we should be able to move our docs to docs.openstack.org from readthedocs14:13
edmondswlots of docs cleanup we can do14:13
edmondswI think that's enough on OOT for today unless anyone has anything else14:14
esbergluedmondsw: I'm putting together a list of backports for the merged IT changes14:14
edmondswesberglu great, thank you14:14
edmondswthat is important14:15
edmondswadded that to the TODO list so I don't forget14:15
edmondswyou can link things there14:16
chhagarwcode is done, its been waiting for devstack to complete, facing issues with devstack14:16
edmondswchhagarw hopefully we can help you get those resolved today/tomorrow14:16
edmondsw#topic Device Passthrough14:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Device Passthrough (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:17
edmondswefried any update?14:17
efriedtrying to think whether I had already mentioned: granular has merged on both sides (placement & scheduler).14:18
efriedNRP series still needs reviews (no action during summit).14:18
efriedLibvirt use of update_provider_tree merged.14:18
efriedI think that's it for now.14:19
edmondswwe learned something interesting at the summit... when you attach a NovaLink adapter, you actually have to attach 3 specific PCI devices as a set to get full performance14:19
edmondswthat can probably be abstracted away from Nova but representing the set as a single thing in placement14:20
edmondswwhen I say nova, I mean outside the driver14:20
efriedYou're talking about the GPUs and the NVLink adapters14:20
edmondswsorry... NVLink, not NovaLink14:20
efriedI don't know HOW you could have confused those.14:20
edmondswfingers doing their own thing14:21
edmondswthere was a very interesting presentation by NTT (Japanese company) about using GPUs with OpenStack on Power systems if anybody wants to go back and watch the replay14:22
edmondswand some good conversation in the hall afterward14:22
edmondsw#topic PowerVM CI14:22
*** openstack changes topic to "PowerVM CI (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:22
edmondsw#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_ci_todos14:23
esbergluvSCSI CI is up but for master branch only14:23
esbergluI've been having mujahidali work on the stable branches14:23
esbergluOh the OOT stable branches14:24
mujahidaliI am trying to enable vscsi on stable branches but I got the error: etcd3 not found.I browse to the location and found that 3.1 version of etcd3 was not there14:24
edmondswno IT since we didn't have vSCSI IT for queens a prev14:24
esberglumujahidali: I haven't had a chance to look at that issue yet14:26
esberglumujahidali: Do you have ETCD_VERSION set in your local.conf?14:27
esbergluedmondsw: Regarding multinode CI. I've been getting pressured from my new position to close all current work14:27
esbergluIn our meeting a few weeks ago we agreed that I would deliver vSCSI CI and help mujahidali finish up multinode14:28
esbergluI can maybe sacrifice a few hours here or there but that's it14:28
edmondswthat's fine as long as it's enough to get things done14:29
edmondswdoes mujahidali know how to take that over?14:29
mujahidaliesberglu, ETCD_VERSION=v3.2.0-rc.1 but need to figure out why it's picking 3.1.1014:29
esbergluI'll put together some notes about what's left for multinode and send it out to both of you14:30
edmondswesberglu ok thanks14:30
esberglumujahidali: I'm going to be redeploying the staging CI environment today, so if you have anything on it you need, save it elsewhere14:31
mujahidaligo ahead14:31
esbergluThere's a bunch of stuff we can clean up around vSCSI CI, I've added all of it to the etherpad so I won't go into it here14:32
edmondswagreed, tx14:32
esbergluThats all14:33
edmondswesberglu thanks. And great job getting vSCSI done14:33
edmondsw#topic Open Discussion14:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)"14:33
edmondswanybody have anything?14:34
edmondswalright, thanks everyone!14:36
*** openstack changes topic to "This channel is for PowerVM-related development and discussion. For general OpenStack support, please use #openstack."14:36
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 29 14:36:26 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-29-14.01.html14:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-29-14.01.txt14:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-29-14.01.log.html14:36
edmondswchhagarw what's your current issue with DevStack?14:36
*** mujahidali has quit IRC14:45
chhagarwmysqld not running14:59
chhagarwstack failed since rabbitmq failed because mysqld is not working15:02
*** tjakobs has quit IRC15:13
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm15:17
edmondswesberglu ^ you know anything about that?15:39
esbergluchhagarw: Did you try restarting mysql?15:39
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC15:49
efriedesberglu, edmondsw: FYI, the pike backport of the UUID stringification is merging.  That allows us to remove a patch from our env, yah?16:09
esbergluedmondsw: efried: 658916:13
esbergluYou guys can +2, I'll wait to merge it until the nova patch merges16:14
*** mujahidali has joined #openstack-powervm16:57
chhagarwtried, but each time rabbitmq is restart mysql went down17:05
*** prashkre has joined #openstack-powervm17:32
*** mujahidali has quit IRC17:33
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-powervm17:58
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051517:58
*** prashkre has quit IRC17:59
*** prashkre has joined #openstack-powervm18:05
*** prashkre_ has joined #openstack-powervm18:07
*** prashkre has quit IRC18:10
*** prashkre_ has quit IRC18:25
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051518:33
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: add lower-constraints job  https://review.openstack.org/55596418:36
efriededmondsw: ^ ftfy18:36
efriededmondsw: Out of curiosity, going to let that spin again without trying to "fix" the pep8 stuff yet, in case those "failures" are somehow caused by same weirdness.18:37
efriededmondsw: Did you ever get resolution on the pathing thing?  Is what we're doing now (using git.o.o) the right way?18:37
edmondswefried yeah I'm not sure what's causing the pep8 issues all the sudden. They aren't neutron-specific pep8 issues, so why would the neutron version matter? It's weird18:46
edmondswas for using git.o.o... the reason I changed to using that is because fungi said we should18:46
edmondswso I did... didn't intend to dig into it any more than that18:46
efriededmondsw: I may be misremembering, but I want to say new hacking rules were introduced recently.  And if we were using Q and are now using R, that'd do it.18:46
efriededmondsw: Yeah, I have no beef with using git.o.o, was just checking whether that was The Final Word or if we were still expecting a fup from fungi.18:47
edmondswyeah I need to find where pep8 checks are excluded and see if that changed18:47
edmondswefried ok, neutron has definitely been fixing pep8 issues and removing things from the ignore line in tox.ini18:49
edmondswso I'll have to go fix that18:49
edmondsweven the one where pep8 is actually wrong, I guess :(18:50
efriededmondsw: Cool beans.  And nice proof that we're dtrt now.18:50
edmondswfirst error complains about import ordering where the import ordering is actually correct18:50
efriedoh?  Looking...18:50
edmondswnetworking_powervm/plugins/ml2/drivers/mech_pvm_base.py:20:1: I100 Import statements are in the wrong order. from neutron.plugins.ml2 should be before from neutron.plugins.ml2.drivers18:51
edmondswbecause that from actually imports rpc, which should come after drivers18:51
edmondswI'm pretty sure I've seen that handled correctly other places, so it was odd to see it complain here18:51
efriededmondsw: I must be looking at something wrong.18:54
efriedokay, you threw me off when you said "first error".18:55
edmondswefried sorry... that was the first when I ran locally18:55
edmondswI don't know if the ordering is the same with zzul18:55
efriedyeah, that one ought to be correct.18:55
edmondswefried can you fix these pep8 issues and rebase onto that?18:56
efriededmondsw: As in, you want me to make the patch that fixes the errors?18:56
edmondswyep, if you would18:57
efriedokay, on it.18:57
edmondswesberglu https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570515/ is going to revert something you did... let me know if you have any concerns there18:59
edmondswI think the community wanted us to do that, but turns out it doesn't work19:00
*** chhagarw has quit IRC19:00
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm19:06
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC19:10
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm19:11
esbergluedmondsw: I'm fine with that revert. You're failing pep8 though19:15
efriedesberglu: I'm working on that.19:17
efriededmondsw: I think the current l-c failure actually found an incompatible constraint :)19:17
efriedas in, actually doing  what it's supposed to.19:18
efriededmondsw: Did you get this while trying to recreate those pep8 failures locally?19:23
efriedAttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'endswith'19:23
efriednever mind19:23
edmondswoh nice... what's the incompatibility?19:27
efriededmondsw: Looks like sqlalchemy.19:32
efriedbut I'm not positive yet.19:32
efriedI'll need to figure out if I can run the l-c job locally.19:32
efriedwasn't there some problem with that?19:32
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC19:34
edmondswefried yeah, can't really be done19:34
efriededmondsw: Yeah, these pep failures are totally wrong.  Supposed to be in sections - base, 3rd party, then local - right?19:36
edmondswyou seeing them complain otherwise?19:39
edmondswas for the sqlalchemy thing... somehow we pulled in 1.0.10 http://logs.openstack.org/15/570515/3/check/openstack-tox-lower-constraints/6c98b40/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-05-29_18_47_51_58144919:39
edmondsweven though neutron master requires >= 1.2.0 https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/requirements.txt#L2119:40
edmondswI will say it's really silly of them to list all those != that are anyway <1.2.019:40
edmondswbut still, how did we get 1.0.10?19:40
edmondswefried ^19:40
edmondswlooks like sqlalchemy added pending_to_persistent in 1.1.019:41
edmondswoh, our lower-constraints.txt says 1.0.10... so that's wrong, because that can't be lower than what neutron requires19:42
efriededmondsw: right.  Need to go through and update things that have moved since this patch was generated.  Probably would be best to run the tools again.  But that may be more trouble than worth.19:44
edmondswI'll fix that while you worry about pep819:45
edmondswalready found another we'll need to update as well19:45
efriededmondsw: Roger that.  Meanwhile... I'm trying to figure out why these bogus import errors are showing up.  I don't see any big patch that "fixed" neutron for this.  But I also don't see them ignoring the errors.  Still playing.19:46
esbergluefried: edmondsw: Procedural -2 was dropped from vSCSI19:47
efriededmondsw: When I try to run pep8 under py2.7, I get:19:48
efriedCertificate did not match expected hostname: git.openstack.org. Certificate: {'notAfter': 'May 19 23:59:59 2019 GMT', 'subjectAltName': (('DNS', 'git.airshipit.org'), ('DNS', 'www.git.airshipit.org')), 'subject': ((('organizationalUnitName', u'Domain Control Validated'),), (('organizationalUnitName', u'PositiveSSL'),), (('commonName', u'git.airshipit.org'),))}19:48
efriedCould not install packages due to an EnvironmentError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='git.openstack.org', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /cgit/openstack/requirements/plain/upper-constraints.txt (Caused by SSLError(CertificateError("hostname 'git.openstack.org' doesn't match either of 'git.airshipit.org', 'www.git.airshipit.org'",),))19:48
efriedthat looks like something in your wheelhouse19:48
edmondswyeah... let me check19:49
edmondswefried that's a totally valid error. The cert returned for git.openstack.org is not valid for git.openstack.org19:50
efriededmondsw: Wonderful.  So why does it work in py3?  And is there a way I can get around it?19:51
edmondswI have no idea why it would work in py3 or how to work around it besides going back to using github19:54
edmondswmaybe they're doing maintenance on git.o.o and the cert was just changed?19:54
efriedI seem to recall getting this a week or two ago as well.19:54
edmondswthis cert was only generated 10 days ago19:54
edmondsw May 19 00:00:00 2018 GMT19:55
edmondswcan you complain on infra?19:55
efriedI can.  Though it would help to have backup from someone who can spell SSL.19:56
edmondswI can do that. I just can't say exactly how you hit it19:56
edmondswI didn't hit it myself19:56
edmondswbut I think I was running under py319:56
edmondswwhy did you change that?19:57
efriededmondsw: Experimenting, trying to get these import errors to go away without actually "fixing" them (to be wrong).19:58
efriededmondsw: Trying to match the neutron env by stages.  The neutron tox.ini uses py2.7 for the pep8 env.19:58
edmondswefried esberglu any idea why networking-powervm requires a newer version of oslo.config than neutron does?19:58
*** tjakobs has quit IRC19:59
efriededmondsw: to what?20:00
efriedCurrent version looks to have been triggered by I4bf5aaf454e2187978571667a554926b634c13ec20:00
efriedpossible that neutron quit paying attention to g-r before n-p did?20:01
edmondswthat could be20:02
edmondswyeah, ours was updated by bot in March: https://github.com/openstack/networking-powervm/commit/0c40c0281b5f7ee88e0c9e6af83610eeb1a305f220:04
edmondswefried I think I'm leaning toward changing back to be consistent with neutron... thoughts?20:04
efriedI guess if it passes CI...20:05
efriedNeed to do that in a separate patch tho20:05
efriedCertainly l-c can have the lower version in the l-c patch.20:06
efriedbut for the main requirements.txt should be different patch20:06
edmondswefried I think the check job will make us change them together20:07
efriededmondsw: if requirements.txt is higher than l-c.txt?  No.20:08
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm20:09
efriededmondsw: You pushing a new rev some time soon?20:11
edmondswefried why make this a separate change?20:11
efriededmondsw: Oh, traceability and revertability.20:11
efriedIt's not related to lower constraints.20:12
edmondswthis patch isn't all about lower constraints20:12
edmondswit's about testing on master20:12
edmondswthere are already other changes in requirements.txt and in tox.ini20:12
efriededmondsw: You're right.  We should do the testing-on-master stuff in one patch, and the l-c stuff in a separate patch.20:13
efriedbut... we already have l-c stuff merged, huh?20:13
efriedIt's just... a separate change.20:13
edmondswyeah, so you've got a chicken-egg problem to split this20:13
edmondswif we take all the l-c stuff out of this patch, it won't pass tox20:14
edmondswit's not a separate change20:14
efriedTesting against neutron master is one thing.  Fixing up reqs to match neutron master *if they break* is related (and inextricable).  Fixing up reqs to match neutron master for no reason other than because they're different -- that's a different change.20:14
edmondswit could be, but... whatever20:16
edmondswextra work for no purpose20:16
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051520:16
efriededmondsw: I'm just anticipating needing to revert that sucker.  It's a cleaner paper trail when you just punch the revert button rather than doing a custom partial-revert where your reviewers (and future we) have to dig into the original's commit message, review history, and code to figure out what it was about and which part is being reverted and why that and not the rest.20:19
edmondswI just can't see why you'd anticipate that. I see zero chance of that happening20:19
edmondswbut i left it out20:20
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm20:20
efriedI'll be delighted if the revert never happens.20:20
edmondswyou may want me to have left out l-c changes to ovsdbapp and oslo.config as well for the same reason?20:21
edmondswthose are the 2 where I actually reduced l-c20:21
efriedreduced it to match master neutron's l-c?20:23
efriedOkay, you're right, it's really not worth it.  Chances of having to revert all (vs. just part) of either change are basically nil.  Just do it all together.20:24
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC20:25
edmondswefried tx20:29
efriededmondsw: Do you have local edits yet?  I have the pep8 fix ready and based under the other.20:29
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051520:29
edmondswjust pushed20:29
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051520:31
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Fix pep8 before moving to master  https://review.openstack.org/57101720:31
efriededmondsw: k, I think I did this right.  ^20:31
efriedyeah, PS6 shows rebase only.20:31
efriededmondsw: Note the main thing in tox.ini was adding that import-order-style thing - that got rid of all the bogus errors.  The rest were legit (things were in the wrong sections).20:32
edmondswefried nice20:32
efriededmondsw: Now we have to decide how we're going to +A these things, since we've both had our hands all over all of them.20:33
efriedCalling mdrabe...20:33
efriedoh, he's not a networking-powervm core20:33
mdrabebye bye20:34
efriededmondsw: Wonder if we should check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555964/ against nova's latest l-c20:34
efriedmdrabe: Don't leave yet -- we'll need you to +A ^20:34
efriededmondsw: I don't think I've seen any l-c bumps go by in nova lately.20:35
efriedokay, no, the only update is to wsgi-intercept, which we don't use.  So we should be good there.  mdrabe, would you +A that sucker please?20:37
edmondswefried I think you can +2 570515, that was mostly me, and then we can get someone else to +A20:37
efriededmondsw: Done.  Maybe we can get Doug and/or Jeremy to +1 and accept that as sufficient to merge.20:38
edmondswprobably ought to wait to make sure zuul likes these before bugging mdrabe :)20:38
efriedwhat could possibly go wrong?20:39
mdrabeefried: Where'd all these lower constraints values come from?20:43
edmondswmdrabe I updated our lower-constraints to match what I found in neutron's requirements.txt (master branch)20:50
edmondswif you're talking about 57051520:50
edmondswif you mean in general, lower-constraints was based off the min value in global-requirements originally, though it has probably diverged since20:51
edmondswmdrabe but look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571017/ first20:52
mdrabeedmondsw: Was looking at 555964, I asked because the values don't appear to be the same as nova's20:53
mdrabeSo I was just wondering where they came from20:53
mdrabeedmondsw: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571017 LGTM, but I can only +1 there20:54
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051520:55
edmondswmdrabe oh, drat, that's networking-powervm not nova-powervm20:55
edmondswI've asked svenkat to look at the networking ones20:59
edmondswmdrabe as for 555964... yeah, we should compare to nova, let me look21:00
esbergluedmondsw: Sorry I haven't been following along. But I can W+1 networking and nova-powervm changes21:00
edmondswesberglu was trying to spare you :)21:01
edmondswI know you're tied up in new things21:01
mdrabeedmondsw: I'll leave a comment on the review21:01
edmondswmdrabe tx... I've gotta run but will look later21:01
esbergluedmondsw: Just 571017 for now?21:01
edmondswesberglu and then 57051521:02
edmondswsvenkat is also looking21:02
esbergluI'll just leave it then21:02
esbergluedmondsw: I've got the staging CI forcing the subnode to be on the same host as the main node21:06
esbergluIt's going to make our nodepool configuration super groos21:06
esbergluWell I guess not that gross, just tons of duplication21:07
*** edmondsw has quit IRC21:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/networking-powervm master: Fix pep8 before moving to master  https://review.openstack.org/57101721:23
openstackgerritMerged openstack/networking-powervm master: Test our master with neutron's master  https://review.openstack.org/57051521:23
*** tjakobs has quit IRC21:37
esbergluefried: They bumped out the runway end date because of the summit21:47
esbergluSo vSCSI should get in this week21:47
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: add lower-constraints job  https://review.openstack.org/55596421:52
efriedmdrabe: ^21:52
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: add lower-constraints job  https://review.openstack.org/55596421:52
efriedrebased ^21:53
efriedWe should totally do a sweep to see which of these silly things we actually need.21:53
efriedI can't imagine we're actually using e.g. "snowballstemmer" (wtf is that anyway)21:53
efriedahdang, I wonder if there's even any reason for us to be listing anything we don't directly require in requirements.txt/test-requirements.txt21:54
*** gman-tx has quit IRC21:58
efriedapparently there is.22:04
*** esberglu has quit IRC22:10
*** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm22:17
*** gman-tx has quit IRC22:23
efriedmdrabe: I've gotten to a point where I don't know wtf to do with these requirements anymore.22:28
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: add lower-constraints job  https://review.openstack.org/55596422:31
openstackgerritEric Fried proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: add lower-constraints job  https://review.openstack.org/55596422:31
efriedlet's try that22:32
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-powervm23:43
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus23:43
*** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm23:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!