Thursday, 2018-04-19

*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm00:16
edmondswefried so... I shouldn't have proposed those translations for stable/queens. I should have proposed for master, and then backported to queens00:17
edmondswhit me in the car on the way home00:17
edmondswI guess at this point I will just propose the same changes to master as a new commit00:17
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:23
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm00:24
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:28
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm00:29
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:32
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm00:32
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:37
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm01:39
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC01:43
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm03:18
*** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm03:57
*** apearson has quit IRC04:39
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm05:57
*** tjakobs has quit IRC06:02
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm07:26
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC12:34
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm12:36
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm12:38
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: update translations for queens
edmondswefried ^12:53
edmondswI'll do the same for the other two projects if you approve12:53
efriededmondsw: was gonna say, I don't think there's anything preventing you from cherry-picking forward.12:53
efrieddid you try it?12:53
edmondswthat's what this is12:53
efriedokay, I hadn't looked yet.12:54
edmondswefried I added a note in the commit message12:54
efriedi c it12:54
efriededmondsw: +A, proceed.12:55
edmondswefried tx12:55
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: update translations for queens
edmondswefried I'm getting a weird error when I try to cherry-pick for ceilometer-powervm: fatal: bad object a29ca2b75ed3a4cdd6e725f1f6a1d8e026e1771d13:01
edmondswany ideas?13:01
edmondswefried oh nm...13:02
edmondswI forgot to git pull first13:02
efriedmm, that'd do it :)13:02
edmondswtyping too fast :)13:02
openstackgerritMatthew Edmonds proposed openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: update translations for queens
*** esberglu has quit IRC13:05
openstackgerritMerged openstack/nova-powervm master: update translations for queens
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC13:23
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm13:24
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm13:25
edmondswefried esberglu I've proposed 6.0.1 tags (queens) for ceilometer-powervm and networking-powervm13:26
edmondswadded you guys13:26
edmondswI'll start working on rocky milestone tags13:26
edmondswso more coming13:26
edmondswefried nice13:38
efriededmondsw: You mean, "nice of them to let us know, for a change"?13:39
edmondswthat too... but I was gonna propose this myself when I got a chance13:39
efriedah, cool13:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: update translations for queens
openstackgerritMerged openstack/networking-powervm master: update translations for queens
edmondswefried esberglu I have also proposed this for PowerVMStackers to follow stable policy:
edmondswI believe we already are, just not tagged as such13:49
efriededmondsw: Doug implied we weren't.13:49
edmondswoh? when?13:49
edmondswoh, in the irc chat yesterday?13:49
edmondswI believe he meant that we're not tagged for it13:50
edmondswwhich is what this fixes13:50
efriedin the nova-powervm release patch13:51
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC13:52
edmondswsure, why not13:53
edmondswI don't think it really matters13:53
edmondswthis is just a milestone tag13:53
efriedit's more about the paperwork of "let's release what's at the tip of master right now"13:53
efriedThat freakin translation drop was a no-op anyway, as noted.13:54
efried'cept for correcting a single-character error in the portuguese.13:54
edmondswshould we hold off on any further merges until the milestone tag goes in, so we're not doing this repeatedly?13:54
efriedOh, did you have a bunch of stuff queued up?13:55
efriedI thought we were pretty clean in the *-powervm repos at this point.13:55
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm13:57
esbergluefried: edmondsw: Queens undercloud is good to go (I have the staging env. running queens right now)14:02
esbergluThe only blocker there previously was the unknown origin of jenkins dropping connections14:03
esbergluwhich turned out to be an issue with the NIC configuration on the staging management server14:03
efriedbooya, who figgered that one out?14:04
efriedThought so.14:04
esbergluWhich I'm very thankful for, I would never have gotten there14:04
efriedMe neither.  Not in a million years.14:05
edmondswme three14:14
edmondswvery glad that is resolved :)14:14
esbergluYep. Now the only multinode blocker is figuring out the compute host situation14:16
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC14:23
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm14:25
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm14:27
*** tjakobs has quit IRC14:35
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC14:40
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm14:40
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm14:42
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC14:54
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm14:56
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC15:04
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm15:08
openstackgerritEric Berglund proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: DNM: ci check
*** zerick has joined #openstack-powervm15:10
edmondswesberglu is there any difference between and ?15:24
esbergluNot sure, I don't see why they wouldn't be the same though15:37
esbergluedmondsw: Why do you ask?15:42
edmondswjust noticed that you had pointed the PowerVC guys to the latter form before, and got curious15:43
esbergluI probably just copied whoever was doing it before I was :)15:52
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC15:55
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm15:56
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC16:11
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm16:14
edmondswefried both IT and OOT drivers lack support for the metadata service, right?16:24
efriededmondsw: No idea.16:24
edmondswI think we're config drive only16:25
edmondswesberglu you know?16:25
edmondswI'm pretty sure that's the case... I'm gonna add it to the OOT todo etherpad16:26
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC16:57
*** efried has quit IRC17:26
*** efried has joined #openstack-powervm17:35
*** efried has quit IRC17:44
*** efried has joined #openstack-powervm17:53
*** tjakobs_ has joined #openstack-powervm18:25
openstackgerritEric Berglund proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: DNM: CI Check2
*** tjakobs has quit IRC18:29
efriededmondsw: yt?18:31
edmondswefried hey18:36
efriededmondsw: I remember hearing something about wanting linux distros like RedHat to implicitly support PowerVM in their openstacks by virtue of the PowerVM driver being in tree.  Does any of that sound familiar?18:37
edmondswRed Hat wouldn't be the best example, because they're a little different than others in what they'll support, but in general yes18:38
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm18:49
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC18:59
esbergluedmondsw: efried: Update on multinode CI. I have a proof of concept working, but it's kind of weird (and doesn't address the same underlying compute host issue yet)20:05
esbergluMost of the roadblocks that I'm hitting are why upstream moved to zuul v3 and ditched jenkins20:05
efriedI thought we did that too20:06
esbergluI'll be pushing up a patch this afternoon, but would like to talk through it with you guys at that point and see what you think before I go any further20:06
esbergluefried: zuul v3 is not ready for 3rd party CI yet20:06
edmondswI won't be able to talk through anything until Friday of next week at the earliest20:07
edmondswout tomorrow, in Austin Mon-Thurs20:07
edmondswunless we do it today20:07
esbergluOkay, let me just push what I have up quick then20:07
esbergluedmondsw: efried: 650420:11
esbergluSo the basic flow, zuul with match a change and call the '{name}-oot-multi'20:11
esbergluWhich does everything through stacking the control node20:11
esbergluThen triggers the second job "compute_node_multi"20:12
esbergluWhich does everything through stacking the compute node20:12
* efried takes micturation break20:12
esbergluThis is the part that gets kind of weird. After the compute nodes stacks we need to go back to the control node and discover the hosts then run tempest20:13
esbergluHowever, due to the nature of jenkins, we can't define a second job on the control node to do so20:14
esbergluAlso due to the nature of jenkins, as soon as the compute job completes, the node will be deleted, so we can't add a step to the control job to do so after the compute node job completes20:14
esberglu"to do so" == discover_hosts and stacking20:15
esbergluSo what I have right now, is that the compute node will issue remote ssh commands back to the control node to discover the hosts and run tempest20:15
edmondswI think that's probably right20:16
esbergluAfter those complete, the compute node job finishes, cleans up, then back to the control node job which finished and cleans up20:16
esbergluIt's not ideal, but I think that it is the best we can do with the current tooling without completely redesigning how we deploy our CI20:16
efriedIf it works, go for it.  We'll get Mujahid to do that last thing.20:18
esbergluThis could be fully functional as it is if we use one massive SSP with all the compute hosts20:18
esbergluI'm still thinking about how to force the same host and have some ideas, but need to test them20:19
esbergluedmondsw: You're okay with this too?20:21
edmondswesberglu yep20:21
edmondswesberglu what ensures that both hosts are found by discover_hosts?20:24
edmondswI think we might have a race condition where the compute-only host may not always be found20:25
edmondswbased on that link I sent you the other day where that service shows up on the controller asynchronously and you might have to wait for it20:25
edmondswsomething to keep an eye out for20:26
esbergluedmondsw: Noted20:26
edmondswesberglu do we still need groups like,members now that we tag everything via openstack/releases?20:37
edmondswand maybe that's a question for the release channel20:37
esbergluedmondsw: I don't think so20:37
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:30
*** tjakobs_ has quit IRC22:07
efriededmondsw: Opportunity to suck up just hit the ML22:21
efried...for a guy who knows his security.22:22
edmondswefried ack, tx22:22
edmondswefried I assume you meant this
edmondswI replied22:33
efriededmondsw: Yes I did.  Cool.22:33
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:49
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm22:49
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:53

Generated by 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!