| *** arnoldje has joined #openstack-performance | 00:11 | |
| *** rfolco has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
| *** rfolco has joined #openstack-performance | 00:20 | |
| *** rfolco has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** ngoracke has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
| *** pbelamge has joined #openstack-performance | 02:49 | |
| *** pbelamge has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 03:27 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 03:43 | |
| *** ngoracke has joined #openstack-performance | 03:44 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** ngoracke has quit IRC | 03:49 | |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-performance | 04:50 | |
| *** arnoldje has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
| *** mdorman has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 08:37 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 08:51 | |
| johnthetubaguy | DinaBelova: yeah, its probably worth trying to get some kind of functional tests ready on top of that patch, so we can merge it quickly in newton, thats the current blocker for getting it merged, the code is there now, its just we don't have any path towards functional tests yet | 09:55 |
|---|---|---|
| johnthetubaguy | I totally missed that till the last moment, which is annoying, but happens | 09:55 |
| *** rfolco has joined #openstack-performance | 10:44 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 10:45 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 10:50 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 11:40 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 11:40 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
| *** xek_ is now known as xek | 11:51 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 12:19 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-performance | 12:39 | |
| *** ngoracke has joined #openstack-performance | 12:50 | |
| *** ngoracke has quit IRC | 12:54 | |
| *** regXboi has joined #openstack-performance | 13:31 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-performance | 13:41 | |
| *** ngoracke has joined #openstack-performance | 13:41 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 14:10 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 14:44 | |
| *** cgross has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| *** cgross has joined #openstack-performance | 14:56 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 15:02 | |
| *** spyderdyne has joined #openstack-performance | 15:27 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 15:31 | |
| spyderdyne | did this team's weekly meeting start 5 minutes ago or do I have the wrong time? | 15:35 |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-performance | 15:45 | |
| *** mdorman has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-performance | 15:47 | |
| DinaBelova | spyderdyne you're in the right place :) | 15:55 |
| *** AugieMena has joined #openstack-performance | 15:56 | |
| *** anevenchannyy__ has joined #openstack-performance | 15:56 | |
| DinaBelova | spyderdyne we'll start in 4 mins | 15:56 |
| DinaBelova | kun_huang, harlowja - are you around? | 15:58 |
| DinaBelova | #startmeeting Performance Team | 16:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Feb 9 16:00:20 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' | 16:00 |
| DinaBelova | ok guys I'm not sure if people are around :) | 16:00 |
| andreykurilin | o/ | 16:00 |
| DinaBelova | andreykurilin o/ | 16:00 |
| *** rvasilets_ has joined #openstack-performance | 16:00 | |
| DinaBelova | anyone else around? :) | 16:01 |
| rvasilets_ | me=) | 16:01 |
| rvasilets_ | Hi | 16:01 |
| DinaBelova | rvasilets_ o/ | 16:01 |
| AugieMena | Hi | 16:01 |
| DinaBelova | we have usual agenda | 16:01 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Action Items | 16:02 |
| DinaBelova | last time ew had in fact only one official action item on me | 16:02 |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-performance | 16:02 | |
| DinaBelova | I went through the spec about performance testing by Dragonflow team - it seems to be ok | 16:02 |
| DinaBelova | the only thing I need to do right now will be to make them publish it to our docs as well | 16:03 |
| DinaBelova | :) | 16:03 |
| DinaBelova | as for the other changes to performance-docs, we in fact did have much progress last week - no significant changes proposed | 16:04 |
| *** gokrokve has joined #openstack-performance | 16:04 | |
| DinaBelova | so it looks like this meeting will be quick :) | 16:04 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Test plans statuses | 16:04 |
| gokrokve | hi | 16:04 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve o/ | 16:04 |
| *** ikhudoshyn has joined #openstack-performance | 16:04 | |
| gokrokve | Give me couple minutes at the end, please | 16:04 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve sure | 16:05 |
| gokrokve | We can discuss what we will do in the lab in Q1 | 16:05 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve ack | 16:05 |
| DinaBelova | so going back to the test plans | 16:05 |
| DinaBelova | currently some refactoring work is in progress by ilyashakhat | 16:06 |
| * SpamapS has a test plan with a status. | 16:06 | |
| DinaBelova | he's splitting test plans to something generic + examples with real tools | 16:06 |
| *** pglass has joined #openstack-performance | 16:06 | |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS - oh, cool :) can you share some details? | 16:06 |
| SpamapS | DinaBelova: certainly | 16:07 |
| SpamapS | So, unfortunately, the ansible I'm using to deploy is not open source, though I'm working on that. :) But we've successfully spun up tooling to test fake nova in 1000 containers using just a couple of smallish hosts. | 16:07 |
| SpamapS | We are going to test 2000 nova-compute's this week, and also the new Neutron OVN work which moves a lot of the python+rabbitmq load off into small C agents. | 16:08 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS wow, that's very cool | 16:08 |
| SpamapS | Our results show that with a _REALLY_ powerful RabbitMQ server, you can absolutely scale Nova well beyond 1000 hypervisors. | 16:08 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS do you have any plans on pushing the test plan and the results to the performance/docs? | 16:09 |
| DinaBelova | to share it with wider audience? | 16:09 |
| SpamapS | 1000 hypervisors, with 60 busy users, results in RabbitMQ using 25 cores (fast baremetal cores) and 10GB of RAM. | 16:09 |
| SpamapS | I plan to publish a paper and discuss it at the summit. | 16:09 |
| SpamapS | And I'm hoping to include ansible roles for spinning up the thousands of fake nova's. | 16:09 |
| SpamapS | What we have found, though, is that the scheduler is a HUGE bottleneck. | 16:10 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS - I think we can place all testing artefacts to the performance-docs as well | 16:10 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS did you file a bug? | 16:10 |
| SpamapS | With 2 schedulers running, they eat 2 cores up, and take increasingly long to finish scheduling requests as more busy users are added. | 16:10 |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-performance | 16:11 | |
| SpamapS | I have not filed bugs just yet, because I have not tested with Mitaka yet. Most of this has been on Liberty | 16:11 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS ack | 16:11 |
| *** redixin has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
| SpamapS | Keystone and Neutron also eat cores very fast, but at a linear scale so far. | 16:11 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so can you keep our eyes on the progress for this testing? also test plan sharing is very welcome for us to take a deeper look :) | 16:12 |
| SpamapS | The problem with the scheduler is when we run with 3, it does not speed up scheduling, because they start stepping on eachother, resulting in retries. | 16:12 |
| gokrokve | This is interesting. I heard there is a config option for scheduler to increase number of threads. | 16:13 |
| SpamapS | So yeah I hope to open this up a bit. My long term goal is to be able to spin up a similar version of this inside infra, with maybe 10 nova-compute's and my counter-inspection stuff verifying that we haven't had any non-linear scale effects. | 16:13 |
| SpamapS | gokrokve: yeah, threads just don't help unfortunately. | 16:13 |
| SpamapS | We have some ideas how they could though | 16:13 |
| gokrokve | Nice | 16:13 |
| SpamapS | Like, have a random filter, that randomly removes half the hosts that come back as possibilities. | 16:13 |
| SpamapS | should reduce conflicts | 16:14 |
| gokrokve | Sounds like a workaround | 16:14 |
| gokrokve | I wonder if Gant project is alive and wants to fix this issue | 16:14 |
| SpamapS | Long term, I'm not sure we can get away from cells as the answer for this. | 16:15 |
| SpamapS | AFAIK, gantt is dead. | 16:15 |
| SpamapS | But maybe it's doing things more now and I missed it. | 16:15 |
| gokrokve | That what I heard as well | 16:15 |
| DinaBelova | hm, I wonder what's the mechanism schedulers are using for the coordination (if any) - it looks like it's wrong | 16:15 |
| SpamapS | they have 0 coordination with eachother. | 16:15 |
| SpamapS | They read the database, choose a host, then attempt to claim resources. | 16:15 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS :D heh, looks like the issue | 16:16 |
| SpamapS | What they should do is attempt to claim things in the database, all in one step. | 16:16 |
| gokrokve | +1 | 16:16 |
| DinaBelova | +1 | 16:16 |
| gokrokve | Sounds like we need to engage nova team | 16:16 |
| gokrokve | We can start with Dims and Jay Pipes. | 16:17 |
| SpamapS | Also they could collaborate by making a hash ring of hosts, and only ever scheduling things to the hosts they own on the hash ring until those hosts fail, and then move down the line to the next hosts. | 16:17 |
| SpamapS | The nova team is focused on cells. | 16:17 |
| SpamapS | That is their answer. | 16:17 |
| SpamapS | And I am increasingly wondering if that will just have to be the answer (even though I think it makes things unnecessarily complex) | 16:17 |
| DinaBelova | well, we can ping someone from Mirantis Nova team and find out if they are interested in fixing | 16:17 |
| SpamapS | To be clear, I'm interested in fixing too. :) | 16:18 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS I would say it'll be overkill | 16:18 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS :D | 16:18 |
| SpamapS | Yeah, we want to be able to run cells of 1000+ hypervisors. | 16:18 |
| DinaBelova | well, yeah - so let's keep our eye on this issue and testing | 16:18 |
| SpamapS | One reason cells have been kept below 800 is that RAX ops is just not built to improve OpenStack reliability, so they have needed to work around the limitations while development works on features. | 16:19 |
| *** jaypipes has joined #openstack-performance | 16:19 | |
| jaypipes | somebody say scheduler? | 16:19 |
| jaypipes | :P | 16:19 |
| SpamapS | Everybody else who is running big clouds is in a similar boat. Cells allows you to make small clouds and stitch them together. | 16:19 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-performance | 16:19 | |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: \o/ | 16:19 |
| DinaBelova | #info SpamapS is working on testing 2000 nova-compute's, and new Neutron OVN work which moves a lot of the python+rabbitmq load off into small C agents. | 16:19 |
| DinaBelova | jaypipes :D | 16:19 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: indeed. I'll summarize where I'm bottlenecking... | 16:19 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS absolutely agree with your thoughts | 16:20 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: We run 1000 pretend fake hypervisors, and 60 pretend users doing create/list/delete. | 16:20 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: With 1 scheduler, this takes an average of 60s per boot. With 2 schedulers, this takes an average of 25s per boot. With 3 schedulers, this takes an average of 60s per boot. | 16:21 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: the 3rd scheduler actually makes it worse, because retries. | 16:21 |
| *** klindgren__ is now known as klindgren | 16:21 | |
| jaypipes | SpamapS: yes, that is quite expected. | 16:21 |
| SpamapS | yeah, no shock on this face ;) | 16:21 |
| DinaBelova | but not that scalable as probably people want :D | 16:22 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: I think one reason there's no urgency on this problem is that cells is just expected to be the way we get around this. | 16:22 |
| jaypipes | SpamapS: not really... the medium-to-long term solution to this is moving claims to the scheduler and getting rid of the cache in the scheduler. | 16:23 |
| SpamapS | But a) I want to build really big cells with less bottlenecks, and b) what about a really busy medium sized cell? | 16:23 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: claims to the scheduler is definitely the thing I want to work on. | 16:23 |
| cdent | the patchset that's in progress right now to duplicate claims in the scheduler probably helps those retries | 16:23 |
| * cdent locates | 16:23 | |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS - it looks like jaypipes has the same approach | 16:23 |
| DinaBelova | yeah | 16:23 |
| SpamapS | sweet | 16:24 |
| jaypipes | SpamapS: I am writing an email to the ML at the moment that describes the progress on the resource tracker and scheduler front. you should read it when it arrives in you inbox. | 16:24 |
| cdent | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262938/ | 16:24 |
| DinaBelova | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262938/ | 16:24 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: wonderful. I have been editting a draft of questions since I started this work, and never ready to send it because I keep finding new avenues to explore. Hopefully I can just delete the draft and reply to you. :) | 16:25 |
| jaypipes | cdent: actually, that patch doesn't help much at all... and is likely to be replaced in the long run, but I suppose it serves the purpose of illustration for the time being. | 16:25 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS :D | 16:25 |
| cdent | jaypipes: I know it is going to be replaced, just it is a datapoint | 16:26 |
| SpamapS | cdent: oh yes, that's definitely along the lines I was thinking to get them to stop stomping on eachother. | 16:26 |
| SpamapS | The other thing I want to experiment with is a scheduler that runs on each nova-compute, and pulls work. | 16:26 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS jaypipes cdent - anything else here? | 16:26 |
| cdent | It's a given that the shared state management in the scheduler, inter and intra, is a mess and having a lock and claim stuff is just stopgaps. | 16:27 |
| jaypipes | SpamapS: that's not the direction we're going but is an interesting conversation nonetheless | 16:27 |
| SpamapS | jaypipes: yeah no it's a spike to solve other problems. Making what the general community has work well would be preferred. | 16:28 |
| cdent | presumably it will just move around the slowness rather than getting to right sooner | 16:28 |
| SpamapS | cdent: it would strip all the features out. | 16:28 |
| DinaBelova | #info let's go through jaypipes email that describes the progress on the resource tracker and scheduler front - let | 16:28 |
| SpamapS | precalc queues based on flavors only | 16:28 |
| cdent | SpamapS: sorry, my "it" was the patch I was referencing. | 16:29 |
| SpamapS | and each compute can decide "can I handle that flavor right now? yes: I will pull jobs from that queue" | 16:29 |
| SpamapS | cdent: ah k. | 16:29 |
| SpamapS | anyway, yes I patiently await your email sir pipes. | 16:29 |
| DinaBelova | ok, cool | 16:30 |
| SpamapS | Oh also we haven't been able to try zmq to solve the 25 core eating RMQ monster because of time constraints. | 16:30 |
| SpamapS | Turns out a couple of 56 core boxes are relatively cheap when you're building thousands of hypervisors out. | 16:30 |
| *** alaski has joined #openstack-performance | 16:31 | |
| dims | SpamapS : on that front, we need help with the zmq driver development | 16:31 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS our internal experiments show that ZMQ is much quicker and eating less resources - but it'll be interesting to take a look on the comparison of the results on your env and your load indeed | 16:32 |
| dims | SpamapS : and testing of course :) | 16:32 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS yeah, dims is right | 16:32 |
| DinaBelova | work on zmq driver is in progress | 16:32 |
| SpamapS | dims: I hope to test it later this week once I get through repeating my work with mitaka. | 16:32 |
| DinaBelova | and continuous improvement | 16:32 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS ack | 16:32 |
| SpamapS | I also need to send notifications via rabbitmq still, so that will be interesting. :) | 16:33 |
| DinaBelova | :D yeah | 16:33 |
| DinaBelova | So I suppose we may move on? | 16:33 |
| SpamapS | Yes, thanks for the in depth discussion though. :) | 16:33 |
| DinaBelova | SpamapS you're welcome sir :) | 16:34 |
| DinaBelova | I just hope to get this info publickly available soon | 16:34 |
| DinaBelova | publicly* | 16:34 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so let's jump to theosprofiler topic | 16:34 |
| DinaBelova | #topic OSProfiler weekly update | 16:34 |
| DinaBelova | in fact profiler had a nervous week :) | 16:35 |
| DinaBelova | we broke some gates with 1.0.0 release and the methods we used for static methods tracing | 16:35 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 16:35 |
| DinaBelova | so the workaround was to skip staticmethods tracing for now, as it has lots of corner cases, that need to be treated separately | 16:36 |
| DinaBelova | and 1.0.1 release seems to work ok - some internal testing by Mirantis folks who needed it has shown good results | 16:36 |
| DinaBelova | dims thanks one more time for quick 1.0.1 release pushing | 16:37 |
| DinaBelova | #info Neutron change https://review.openstack.org/273951 is still in progress | 16:37 |
| DinaBelova | sadly I did not have enough time to make if fully workable yet, that's still in progress | 16:38 |
| DinaBelova | the situation with nova change is a bit different - but with the same result | 16:38 |
| DinaBelova | #info Nova change https://review.openstack.org/254703 won't land in Mitaka due to the lack of functional testing | 16:39 |
| DinaBelova | so either Boris or I will need to add this specific job to get it landed early in Newton | 16:39 |
| DinaBelova | johnthetubaguy - thanks btw for letting me know about what do you guys want to see to get it merged :) it was sad that it won't land in M releaase, but still | 16:40 |
| DinaBelova | in fact all other work is still in progress with the patches for neutron, nova, keystone on review | 16:41 |
| DinaBelova | any questions regarding the profiler? | 16:42 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so let's go to the open discussion | 16:42 |
| DinaBelova | #topic Open Discussion | 16:42 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve the floor is yours | 16:42 |
| gokrokve | Cool. Thannks | 16:43 |
| gokrokve | As you probably know we now have a lab with 240 physical nodes | 16:43 |
| gokrokve | In Q1 we plan to do several tests related to: MQ (RabbitMQ vs ZMQ), DB (MySQL Galera) and Nova conductor behavior | 16:44 |
| gokrokve | In adidtion to that we a re working on rally enhancement to add networking workloads to test data plane networking performance for tenant networks | 16:44 |
| DinaBelova | + baremetal provisioning scalability for the cloud deployment | 16:44 |
| gokrokve | This will be done in upstream rally. Most of the functionality is already available but we need to create workload itself | 16:45 |
| gokrokve | Yep and baremetal as well. | 16:45 |
| *** ikhudoshyn has left #openstack-performance | 16:45 | |
| gokrokve | We also working on test results format | 16:46 |
| gokrokve | So that it can be published more or less automatically in RST format | 16:46 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve I think that almost all details are published on the test plans, we'll probably change them if something else will be needed to to covered | 16:46 |
| gokrokve | I hope we will be able to upstream this as well | 16:46 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve indeed | 16:46 |
| gokrokve | Sure, test plans will be changed accordingly | 16:47 |
| DinaBelova | also afair kun_huang 's lab is going to appear somewhen close to Feb 18th | 16:47 |
| gokrokve | This is great. | 16:47 |
| DinaBelova | so listomin will coordinate if we can run something else on that lab as well | 16:47 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve +1 :) | 16:47 |
| gokrokve | More independent runs we have more confident we will be with the results | 16:48 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve indeed | 16:48 |
| gokrokve | So that is almost it. | 16:48 |
| gokrokve | I just want to share these plans for Q1 with the audience. | 16:48 |
| DinaBelova | gokrokve thank you sir | 16:48 |
| DinaBelova | ok, folks, any questions? | 16:49 |
| DinaBelova | ok, so thanks everyone for coming and special thanks to SpamapS for raising very interesting topic | 16:50 |
| DinaBelova | see u guys | 16:50 |
| DinaBelova | #endmeeting | 16:50 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Feb 9 16:50:16 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:50 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2016/performance_team.2016-02-09-16.00.html | 16:50 |
| *** anevenchannyy___ has joined #openstack-performance | 16:50 | |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2016/performance_team.2016-02-09-16.00.txt | 16:50 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2016/performance_team.2016-02-09-16.00.log.html | 16:50 |
| *** anevenchannyy__ has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 16:58 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 16:58 | |
| *** spyderdyne has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-performance | 17:07 | |
| *** amaretskiy1 has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
| *** gokrokve has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** anevenchannyy___ has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| *** pglass has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-performance | 18:43 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-performance | 18:51 | |
| harlowja | damn guess i should of came to that meeting | 18:55 |
| harlowja | lol | 18:55 |
| harlowja | SpamapS good stuff btw | 19:01 |
| * harlowja read meeting 'logs | 19:01 | |
| harlowja | SpamapS 'precalc queues based on flavors only' didn't u suggest that a few years ago, lol | 19:04 |
| harlowja | or was that someone else | 19:04 |
| * harlowja its all a blur | 19:04 | |
| harlowja | jaypipes i also await your email :) | 19:06 |
| *** pglass has joined #openstack-performance | 19:14 | |
| *** suro-patz has joined #openstack-performance | 19:17 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 19:17 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 19:30 | |
| *** ngoracke has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
| *** ngoracke has joined #openstack-performance | 19:39 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 19:42 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 19:46 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-performance | 19:47 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
| *** rfolco has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| harlowja | DinaBelova so i think i got a volunteer from yahoo that will show up to this weekly (since i never get up), another senior guy here | 20:16 |
| harlowja | let's see if that happens :) | 20:16 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja volunteer who will be doing what? :) | 20:19 |
| harlowja | stuff | 20:19 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:19 |
| DinaBelova | anyway glad to hear this :) | 20:19 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 20:19 |
| harlowja | stuff stuff | 20:19 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:19 |
| harlowja | all the stuff | 20:19 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:19 |
| DinaBelova | performance-related I hope :D | 20:20 |
| harlowja | ya, he has been doing that recently | 20:20 |
| harlowja | (with ironic) | 20:20 |
| harlowja | so can offer insight there as well | 20:20 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja - cool! | 20:53 |
| DinaBelova | https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/presentation/7399 | 20:54 |
| DinaBelova | btw | 20:54 |
| DinaBelova | ^^ | 20:54 |
| harlowja | cool | 20:54 |
| harlowja | would love to see! | 20:54 |
| harlowja | obviously | 20:54 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:54 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 20:54 |
| harlowja | 'Her experience includes close interaction with all OpenStack projects and their improvement to satisfy the needs of cloud users.' | 20:54 |
| harlowja | good job! | 20:54 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:54 |
| harlowja | :) | 20:54 |
| harlowja | pretty sure u are dina | 20:54 |
| harlowja | haha | 20:54 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja :D lol, you know these bullshitty descriptions you sometimes need to either write yourself or read what others (marketing, usually :D) write about you :D | 20:56 |
| harlowja | ;) | 20:57 |
| harlowja | ya, i know, ha | 20:57 |
| DinaBelova | Joshua Harlow is one of the technical leads on the OpenStack team who has helped OpenStack gain initial and continued traction inside Yahoo!. He was a member of the initial CTO subteam investigating IAAS solutions where OpenStack was chosen and has been pushing OpenStack from the start of its usage at Yahoo!. Joshua has been involved in OpenStack since 2011 and has contributed patches to most of the core projects (with the hope of | 20:57 |
| DinaBelova | contributing many more patches soon). | 20:57 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 20:57 |
| harlowja | superduper | 20:57 |
| harlowja | i wrote that myself i think | 20:57 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:57 |
| DinaBelova | well, your one is also pathetic :D | 20:57 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:57 |
| harlowja | i gotta add more awesome to that | 20:57 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:57 |
| DinaBelova | :D https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/presentation/8490 | 20:58 |
| DinaBelova | cool topic btw | 20:58 |
| harlowja | ha | 20:58 |
| harlowja | vilobh did all that, i just tag along to talks, lol | 20:58 |
| harlowja | i am the support-speaker | 20:59 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 20:59 |
| harlowja | (aka support the other speaker) | 20:59 |
| harlowja | hmmm | 20:59 |
| harlowja | 'Vice Executive Hacker, Yahoo!' | 20:59 |
| harlowja | i think i need to now be 'Executive' | 20:59 |
| harlowja | now more vice crap | 20:59 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:59 |
| DinaBelova | yeah, that's VERY pathetic :D | 20:59 |
| harlowja | lol | 20:59 |
| harlowja | Chief Executive Hacker | 21:00 |
| harlowja | maybe that | 21:00 |
| harlowja | lol | 21:00 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 21:00 |
| harlowja | Chief Superman | 21:00 |
| harlowja | maybe that | 21:00 |
| harlowja | idk | 21:00 |
| harlowja | ha | 21:00 |
| harlowja | decisions decisions | 21:00 |
| harlowja | lol | 21:00 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja btw probably you'll be interested as well https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/presentation/7424 | 21:01 |
| DinaBelova | folks from our Horizon team working on this now | 21:01 |
| harlowja | cool | 21:01 |
| DinaBelova | interesting stuff | 21:01 |
| harlowja | that dina person is in that one to | 21:01 |
| harlowja | weird! | 21:01 |
| harlowja | lol | 21:01 |
| DinaBelova | yeah, I'm helping them with profiler :D | 21:02 |
| harlowja | :) | 21:02 |
| DinaBelova | btw some guys from our Cinder team have several Cinder-performance-related bugs, and they asked help in its deployment/usage. I gave an instruction, etc. | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | then something strange happenned - traces were weird | 21:03 |
| harlowja | lol | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | we started to debug | 21:03 |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-performance | 21:03 | |
| harlowja | did cinder take to many drugs? | 21:03 |
| harlowja | bad-drugs | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | and found out 2 things | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | 1) cinder was broken on the env | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 21:03 |
| DinaBelova | 2) folks forgot to set enable plugin osprofiler in devstack :D | 21:04 |
| harlowja | ya, sounds like someone over there on some drugs | 21:04 |
| harlowja | lol | 21:04 |
| *** pglbutt has joined #openstack-performance | 21:04 | |
| DinaBelova | after these two moments were fixed everything began to work ok :D | 21:04 |
| harlowja | woot | 21:04 |
| *** pglass_ has joined #openstack-performance | 21:05 | |
| * harlowja trying to figure out where the speaker profile editing page is | 21:05 | |
| harlowja | lol | 21:05 |
| DinaBelova | it's somewhere in profiler | 21:05 |
| DinaBelova | profile**** | 21:05 |
| harlowja | my profile is in osprofiler!!! | 21:05 |
| harlowja | woah | 21:05 |
| harlowja | i didn't know it had that feature | 21:05 |
| DinaBelova | https://www.openstack.org/profile/speaker | 21:05 |
| harlowja | ya, think i found it | 21:05 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 21:05 |
| *** pglass has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| harlowja | odd, saying bio is required and my bio is 'Make things more awesome!' | 21:07 |
| harlowja | notcool | 21:07 |
| harlowja | that is my bio | 21:07 |
| harlowja | :( | 21:07 |
| *** pglbutt has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
| harlowja | hmmm, bio changed doens't show up on speaker talks | 21:09 |
| harlowja | durn | 21:09 |
| harlowja | oh well | 21:09 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja - probably it's frozen until the end of voting? | 21:42 |
| *** regXboi has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| DinaBelova | @harlowja please take a look https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278103/ | 21:43 |
| DinaBelova | boris-42 ^^ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278103/ | 21:45 |
| harlowja | DinaBelova good idea | 22:09 |
| harlowja | i'd really like to get people to use the metaclass osprofiler provides :-/ | 22:09 |
| harlowja | vs trace_cls | 22:09 |
| DinaBelova | harlowja yeah, but metaclass is good for the strict classes hierarchy with parents-children. Sadly does not work that good in case of neutron mixins :D | 22:10 |
| harlowja | ya | 22:10 |
| harlowja | gotta be a better way | 22:11 |
| harlowja | i believe! | 22:11 |
| harlowja | lol | 22:11 |
| DinaBelova | :D | 22:11 |
| DinaBelova | let's believe together, it's a chance our mental force will be enough to fix it :D | 22:11 |
| harlowja | :) | 22:13 |
| *** pglass_ has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
| harlowja | +2 | 22:13 |
| harlowja | boris-42 u want to believe also? | 22:13 |
| harlowja | lol | 22:13 |
| harlowja | idea, very very hacky, replace type with our metaclass ... | 22:14 |
| harlowja | osprofiler.patch() | 22:15 |
| harlowja | monkey it | 22:15 |
| harlowja | not like it so much, ha | 22:15 |
| harlowja | lol | 22:15 |
| *** pglass has joined #openstack-performance | 22:22 | |
| *** redixin has left #openstack-performance | 22:34 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-performance | 22:39 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 22:57 | |
| *** jaypipes has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 23:25 | |
| *** mdorman has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-performance | 23:48 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!