Monday, 2016-12-05

*** kong_ has joined #openstack-nimble00:26
*** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-nimble01:41
zhenguomorning nimble!02:04
liushengmorning02:17
openstackgerritMerged openstack/nimble: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/40623802:25
liushengzhenguo: do you know why ironic need to set "create_isolated_networks" to False when running tempest ?02:54
zhenguoliusheng: not sure02:55
zhenguoliusheng: do you think that the root reason for us to not get tenant network?02:56
liushengzhenguo: the option will make tempest don't creat tenant network02:56
liushengzhenguo: yes02:56
liushenghttps://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/devstack/lib/ironic#L162202:57
zhenguoliusheng: oh, can we enable it manually?02:57
liushengzhenguo: I am not sure if that will break ironic process, and, it is hard to decide the order, not sure02:58
liushenghttp://logs.openstack.org/52/404552/3/check/gate-nimble-dsvm-tempest-plugin/d55b343/logs/tempest.txt.gz02:58
liushengaccoriding to the log, the config option is True firstly, and then be set to False02:58
zhenguoliusheng: yes, but why they need to set it to False, I will dig03:01
liushengzhenguo: there are descriptions in the tempest's doc:03:04
liushengzhenguo: However, there is an option create_isolated_networks to disable dynamic credentials's automatic provisioning of network resources. If this option is set to False you will have to either rely on there only being a single/default network available for the server creation, or use fixed_network_name to inform Tempest which network to use.03:04
zhenguoliusheng: so we can still use default network or fixed_network_name? do we have such nework there?03:11
liushengzhenguo: yes, I am finding the way if we can use the option to instead03:12
zhenguoliusheng: thanks! hope it can work03:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/nimble: Catch build/delete networks and instances exceptions  https://review.openstack.org/40468603:13
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/nimble: Add tempest tests for instance creation(WIP)  https://review.openstack.org/40455203:33
*** yuntongjin has quit IRC03:33
zhenguoliusheng: seems the network issue has been solved, but still have some problems with the post return value :P04:35
*** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-nimble04:50
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/nimble: [WIP] Add engine unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/40574004:51
liushengzhenguo: hmmm, good news :P06:13
zhenguoliusheng: hah06:13
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/nimble: [WIP] Add engine unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/40574006:37
*** kong_ has quit IRC06:50
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/nimble: [WIP] Add engine unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/40574007:22
zhenguoliusheng: do you have time to update the tempest patch, I can't wait to see it turns to green.07:24
liushengzhenguo: do you have patch depends on it ?07:37
zhenguoliusheng: no, just want to see :P07:37
liushengzhenguo: there are issues when creating instance07:37
liushenghttp://logs.openstack.org/52/404552/4/check/gate-nimble-dsvm-tempest-plugin/e601e82/logs/screen-nimble-engine.txt.gz#_2016-12-05_04_06_42_12407:37
zhenguoliusheng: oh sorry, I was thinking it was easy to fix07:42
zhenguoliusheng: seems the instance destroyed while it is provisioning07:47
liushengzhenguo: that may because I didn't add waiters to wait until the instance becoming ACTIVE, and the tempest clean resource07:49
zhenguoliusheng: seems it is07:49
zhenguoliusheng: but how do we avoid instance be deleted while it is provisioning07:50
zhenguoliusheng: does this be allowed?07:51
zhenguoliusheng: not sure how nova handle this, or you can delete instance in any state07:51
liushengC:/Python27/Lib/site-packages/tempest/common/compute.py:3007:52
liushengcreate_test_server the method use a waiter(timer) to wait the instances becoming ACTIVE07:53
liushengzhenguo: yes, deletion action is allowed in any state07:53
zhenguoliusheng: yes, so besides tempest, we should also change our codes to avoid so many exceptions07:55
liushengzhenguo: I have another thing need to handle now, I will try to fix it today evening :)07:59
zhenguoliusheng: ok08:00
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC08:03
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-nimble08:09
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/nimble: Remove unneeded node_cache_time  https://review.openstack.org/40678508:09
*** yuntongjin has quit IRC08:25
*** RuiChen has quit IRC08:59
*** RuiChen has joined #openstack-nimble08:59
*** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-nimble09:02
*** kong_ has joined #openstack-nimble09:31
*** shihanzhang has joined #openstack-nimble09:43
* zhenguo away for dinner09:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/nimble: Remove unneeded node_cache_time  https://review.openstack.org/40678513:01
*** kong_ has quit IRC13:10
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC16:35
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-nimble18:54
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus18:54
*** shz has joined #openstack-nimble19:18
*** shihanzhang has quit IRC19:28
*** kong_ has joined #openstack-nimble20:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!