| yasufum | Hi tacker team. | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| yuta-kaz_ | hi | 08:01 |
| ueha | Hi | 08:01 |
| yasufum | #startmeeting tacker | 08:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Nov 22 08:01:21 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' | 08:01 |
| manpreetk | hi | 08:01 |
| yasufum | hi | 08:01 |
| yasufum | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting | 08:01 |
| yasufum | We have one item on the etherpad today for which we didn't have enough time to discuss last week. | 08:03 |
| yasufum | #topic Legacy API deprecation | 08:03 |
| yasufum | ueha: Do you have any update anyway? | 08:04 |
| yasufum | although we agree to continue at the last. | 08:04 |
| ueha | Yes, I added "Legacy FTs deprecation" to this suggestion roadmap as yuta-kazato suggested. | 08:05 |
| ueha | Thank you, kazato-san. | 08:05 |
| yasufum | here? | 08:05 |
| yasufum | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-legacy-deprecation | 08:06 |
| ueha | Yes, L63~64 | 08:06 |
| yuta-kazato | Thank you for your cooperation! +1 | 08:07 |
| ueha | If there is no objection, I'll send about the Legacy API deprecation topic to Discuss-ML to see if anyone is using it. | 08:08 |
| hiromu | +1 | 08:09 |
| yasufum | discussion? | 08:12 |
| yasufum | or all of us agree? | 08:12 |
| manpreetk | Just want to know we would take care of tacker-horizon as well. As it totally support legacy API. | 08:13 |
| ueha | I was also a little concerned it. | 08:14 |
| manpreetk | Hmm not sure how many user would be there using tacker-horizon. | 08:15 |
| ueha | I think we may also need to obsolete it when Legacy API becomes obsolete (c cycle). | 08:16 |
| yasufum | takahashi-tsc: By the way, no change is required for ETSI TST test? | 08:17 |
| yasufum | Nothing depend on the legacy apis? | 08:17 |
| manpreetk | ueha: Yup think so, we have to discontinue, or enhance tacker-horizon to support SOL APIs. | 08:17 |
| takahashi-tsc | No need to change, ETSI TST testset includes only SOL-based API. | 08:18 |
| yasufum | good | 08:18 |
| ueha | When I send email to Disscuss ML, also I will hear about Tacker-horizon. | 08:18 |
| manpreetk | thanks | 08:18 |
| ueha | manpreetk: I don't think the need for SOL-API support of Tacker-Horizon has been discussed yet. right? | 08:20 |
| manpreetk | ueha: There was a proposal in last Zed PTG by asahina-san. | 08:21 |
| manpreetk | hiromu: Hope I am correct, to enhance tacker-horizon. | 08:22 |
| ueha | Sorry I missed it, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-zed-ptg#L75 | 08:23 |
| ueha | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/enhance-tacker-horizon | 08:24 |
| manpreetk | yes this one | 08:24 |
| ueha | but, I think there is no progress of this blueprint in Zed cycle | 08:25 |
| ueha | So, first, I will hear if users using the Legacy API from Tacker-Horizon. | 08:26 |
| yasufum | +1 | 08:26 |
| yasufum | Any other comment? | 08:28 |
| yasufum | good | 08:29 |
| yasufum | ueha: I'd appreciate if you update your etherpad for the comments from team. Thanks! | 08:29 |
| ueha | Sure, I will update! | 08:30 |
| yasufum | Is there any topic other than on the etherpad? | 08:31 |
| yasufum | Or close this meeting? | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | This is regarding migration of tacker jobs to Ubuntu Jammy (22.04), the proposed patch [1] temporary disables "ceilometer" as it was failing tacker gate jobs. | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | In parallel I have open a new patch [2] to debug tacker gate jobs enabling "Ceilometer". | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/861137 | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/865234 | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | IMO, we can merge patch [1] once it Zuul gate jobs pass without ceilometer. WDYT? | 08:31 |
| manpreetk | I would like to know team view about above suggestion. Thanks!!! | 08:32 |
| yasufum | let's me confirm ... | 08:33 |
| yasufum | It looks good for now, but please let me check and reply later. | 08:37 |
| yasufum | Thanks. | 08:37 |
| manpreetk | Thanks for help!! | 08:37 |
| manpreetk | Thats all from my side. | 08:38 |
| yasufum | ok, thanks | 08:38 |
| yasufum | other topic? | 08:38 |
| yasufum | manpreetk: By the way, have you checked if you can change status of bug report on launchpad by yourself? | 08:39 |
| yasufum | to "Won't fix" | 08:40 |
| manpreetk | Sorry I haven't, i ll let you know soon. | 08:40 |
| yasufum | OK | 08:41 |
| yasufum | It seems enough for today. | 08:42 |
| yasufum | So, let's close this meeting. | 08:42 |
| yasufum | Thanks for joining, bye! | 08:42 |
| manpreetk | Thanks!! Bye!! | 08:42 |
| ueha | Thanks, bye | 08:42 |
| yasufum | #endmeeting | 08:43 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 22 08:43:08 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 08:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2022/tacker.2022-11-22-08.01.html | 08:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2022/tacker.2022-11-22-08.01.txt | 08:43 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2022/tacker.2022-11-22-08.01.log.html | 08:43 |
| yuta-kazato | bye | 08:44 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 13:55 | |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 16:23 | |
| gmann | #startmeeting policy_popup | 17:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Nov 22 17:00:37 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 17:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 17:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'policy_popup' | 17:00 |
| gmann | this is RBAC meeting on new time | 17:01 |
| gmann | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-goal-tracking#L151 | 17:01 |
| gmann | nothing in agenda, I will be around for couple of min if anyone shows up for any query related to the RBAC | 17:01 |
| johnsom | gmann Have we decided that scoped tokens are permanently dead? I.e. we should remove that code from the projects? | 17:02 |
| gmann | johnsom: yeah no system scope but policy can be scoped to projects only. means keep the scope_type=['project'] in all the policy | 17:03 |
| gmann | nova, neutron, glance did the same in Zed release | 17:03 |
| johnsom | And we do not intend to enable system scope at any future point? (That is my question) | 17:03 |
| gmann | example #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/855435 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848021 | 17:04 |
| johnsom | Both Octavia and Designate implemented the full system scope and new defaults back for Wallaby. System scope brought a bunch of complexity, both in the code and testing side. So I'm trying to figure out if we have made a solid decision on the new-new that we should work against, I.e. roll back the system scope stuff permanently | 17:05 |
| johnsom | Yeah, those were only partial implementation in the first place, so not sure good examples. | 17:05 |
| gmann | johnsom: I do not think so as system scope does not work for heat/nfv use cases, so it is difficult unless we figure out new design | 17:05 |
| johnsom | Ok, so I will go on that. Basically we don't expect the goal to change again or system scope to come back in b/c/d. | 17:06 |
| gmann | yes, we should not go back to system scope implementation and final directions are what we have in current goal 1. remove system scope 2. keep legacy admin behaviour | 17:07 |
| johnsom | Ack, this is a much better user experience | 17:07 |
| gmann | johnsom: yes, at least this is current goal and feasible way to proceed on RBAC (at least doing project reader) | 17:07 |
| gmann | yes, at least projetc personas are useful | 17:07 |
| johnsom | Yeah, we had that role in Octavia since Pike | 17:08 |
| johnsom | So it was just a mapping | 17:08 |
| gmann | cool | 17:08 |
| johnsom | Thanks for the clarification. With all of the changes I wanted to get a feeling on if we are locked in now. | 17:09 |
| gmann | +1 | 17:09 |
| johnsom | That is the only topic I had this week. | 17:09 |
| gmann | ok, thanks johnsom | 17:10 |
| gmann | ok, if nothing else let's close the meeting. | 17:11 |
| gmann | #endmeeting | 17:11 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 22 17:11:36 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:11 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/policy_popup/2022/policy_popup.2022-11-22-17.00.html | 17:11 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/policy_popup/2022/policy_popup.2022-11-22-17.00.txt | 17:11 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/policy_popup/2022/policy_popup.2022-11-22-17.00.log.html | 17:11 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 20:31 | |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 22:25 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!