Thursday, 2013-01-10

*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** anniec_ has quit IRC00:04
*** juice has quit IRC00:07
*** joesavak has quit IRC00:09
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away00:09
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul00:11
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** _ozstacker_ has quit IRC00:17
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:18
*** ijw1 has quit IRC00:22
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting00:23
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away00:27
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul00:27
*** kaganos has quit IRC00:28
*** sdake_z has quit IRC00:29
*** jaypipes has quit IRC00:29
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
*** joesavak has quit IRC00:43
*** markwash has quit IRC00:44
*** kota has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting00:45
*** ewindisch has quit IRC00:46
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz00:47
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting00:48
*** jaypipes has quit IRC00:51
*** kota has quit IRC00:55
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy00:59
*** edgarstp has quit IRC01:12
*** bencherian has quit IRC01:15
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC01:16
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC01:25
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** sarob has quit IRC01:30
*** Shengjie_Min has quit IRC01:32
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away01:33
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net01:33
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk01:39
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz01:42
*** stevebaker has quit IRC01:47
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting01:47
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away01:53
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC01:53
*** krtaylor has quit IRC01:59
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy02:00
*** ryanpetr_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:01
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:04
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** jsavak has quit IRC02:12
*** anniec has quit IRC02:14
*** adjohn has quit IRC02:21
*** sarob has quit IRC02:24
*** maoy_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:25
*** kaganos has quit IRC02:28
*** maoy has quit IRC02:29
*** maoy_ is now known as maoy02:29
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC02:30
* llu abc02:31
llutestme02:32
*** maoy has quit IRC02:32
*** bencherian has quit IRC02:45
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** zul has quit IRC02:56
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz02:57
*** joesavak has quit IRC02:58
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** yaguang has quit IRC03:03
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** gatuus has quit IRC03:08
*** roaet is now known as roaet-away03:09
*** hemna__ is now known as hemna03:20
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting03:23
*** jsavak has quit IRC03:26
*** roaet-away is now known as roaet03:31
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** ayoung has quit IRC03:34
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting03:35
*** adjohn has quit IRC03:36
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy03:37
*** maurosr has quit IRC03:41
*** anniec has quit IRC04:04
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting04:07
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz04:18
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting04:19
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** cdub has quit IRC04:30
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting04:36
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting04:39
*** ewindisch has quit IRC04:47
*** MarkAtwood has left #openstack-meeting05:02
*** kaganos has quit IRC05:09
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting05:14
*** jcooley is now known as jcooley|away05:15
*** juice has quit IRC05:16
*** jcooley|away is now known as jcooley05:19
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting05:21
*** ozstacker has quit IRC05:33
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** roaet is now known as roaet-away05:34
*** annegentle_itsme has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** markmcclain has quit IRC05:54
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy05:55
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz06:01
*** jgriffith has quit IRC06:13
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** annegentle_itsme has quit IRC06:14
*** jaypipes has quit IRC06:18
*** ryanpetr_ has quit IRC06:19
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan06:49
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov06:56
*** stevebaker has quit IRC07:08
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** martine has quit IRC07:12
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting07:20
*** eglynn has quit IRC07:49
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-meeting08:13
*** matiu has quit IRC08:21
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** bencherian has quit IRC08:44
*** EmilienM__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:54
*** jaypipes has quit IRC08:55
*** aabes has quit IRC09:00
*** aabes has joined #openstack-meeting09:01
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:02
*** mrunge has quit IRC09:09
*** danwent has quit IRC09:18
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting09:38
*** mnewby has quit IRC09:45
*** stevebaker has quit IRC09:50
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting09:50
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** mikal has quit IRC10:14
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting10:16
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting10:27
*** vkmc has quit IRC10:28
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** salv-orlando has left #openstack-meeting10:39
*** torgomatic has quit IRC11:09
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** kmartin has quit IRC11:23
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting11:41
*** rkukura has quit IRC11:44
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting11:57
*** martine_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** spn has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC13:12
*** jgriffith has quit IRC13:16
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** yaguang has quit IRC13:18
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting13:32
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC13:39
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** martine_ has quit IRC13:47
*** edgarstp has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** annegentle_itsme has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:53
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** dtynan has left #openstack-meeting14:02
*** roaet-away is now known as roaet14:02
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:05
*** krtaylor has quit IRC14:06
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
*** annegentle_itsme has quit IRC14:10
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** edgarstp has quit IRC14:14
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away14:18
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** dabo has quit IRC14:19
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** annegentle_itsme has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez14:47
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** anniec has quit IRC14:54
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec14:54
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** llu-laptop has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
nijaba#startmeeting Ceilometer15:00
nijaba#meetingtopic Ceilometer15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jan 10 15:00:05 2013 UTC.  The chair is nijaba. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
nijaba#chair nijaba15:00
nijaba#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda15:00
nijabaATTENTION: please keep discussion focused on topic until we reach the open discussion topic15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:00
openstackCurrent chairs: nijaba15:00
nijabaHello everyone! Show of hands, who is around for the ceilometer meeting?15:00
nijabao/15:00
dhellmanno/15:00
llu-laptopo/15:00
n0anoo/15:00
eglynno/15:00
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
gpernoto/15:00
nijabajd__: around?15:00
jd__nijaba: yes15:01
jd__totally missed the time!15:01
nijaba#topic actions from previous meeting15:01
nijaba#topic llu to report agreement result to wiki page15:01
nijaba#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Ceilometer/CeilometerAndHealthnmon15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "actions from previous meeting (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "llu to report agreement result to wiki page (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:01
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
nijaballu-laptop: anything to report?15:01
llu-laptopi've put the plan in the wiki15:01
nijabanice! thank you15:01
nijaba#topic nijaba to get in touch with the healthmon team to see what their reaction is to our plan for integration15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to get in touch with the healthmon team to see what their reaction is to our plan for integration (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:02
nijabaI have not done much on this, but maybe now in overlap with llu-laptopÅ› work?15:02
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** yjiang5_home has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
yjiang5_homeo/15:02
*** Barath_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
llu-laptopi havn't got in touch with the Healthnmon guy15:03
nijabaok, so I'll re-action myself on this15:03
nijaba#action nijaba to get in touch with the healthmon team to see what their reaction is to our plan for integration15:03
nijaba#topic nijaba to find out if EmilienM wishes to commit on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/api-aggregate-average15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to find out if EmilienM wishes to commit on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/api-aggregate-average (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:03
nijabaEmilien is a bit shy about his python skills.  We may need to find someone else...15:03
Barath_Self and divakar from Health and Mon have joined the IRC15:03
nijabaBarath_: welcome!15:04
dhellmannnijaba: the v2 api implementation asalkeld started includes this15:04
nijabait does?  cool!!15:04
dhellmannyeah, he went ahead with the new statistics endpoint that calculates all of that stuff at the same time15:04
dhellmannvery slick15:04
nijabashould I make this bp as a dep of the v2 api work then?15:05
dhellmannyes, let's do that15:05
nijaba#info already implemented in v2 api15:05
nijaba#action nijaba to mak this bp as a dep for v2 api15:06
nijaba#topic nijaba to send an email to openstack-dev listing the orphan bps15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to send an email to openstack-dev listing the orphan bps (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:06
nijabaI just did this15:06
nijaba#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-January/004398.html15:06
nijaba#topic nijaba to add bp skeleton to remind ourselves to implement higher level tests for db backends15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to add bp skeleton to remind ourselves to implement higher level tests for db backends (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:06
nijabathis was done15:06
nijaba#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/test-db-backends15:06
nijabaThat's it for last week action15:07
nijaba#topic G2 release status15:07
*** openstack changes topic to "G2 release status (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:07
nijabaWe have 2 release critical bugs we need to fix urgently as ttx is trying to cut the release today15:07
nijaba#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/109820415:07
nijaba#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/109820615:07
nijabaWe need a plan and keep ttx in the loop15:07
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1098204 in ceilometer "API ACL authentication is broken" [Critical,Confirmed]15:07
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1098206 in ceilometer "policy.json is never found" [Critical,Confirmed]15:07
ttxs/release/milestone but yes15:07
nijabajd__: are you working on fixes?15:07
jd__I'm right now15:07
nijabajd__: any eta?15:08
jd__should be ok by the end of the day15:08
ttxyou'll need to land them in master then proposed backport for milestone-proposed15:08
jd__ttx: that's what I though15:08
ttxhttp://wiki.openstack.org/GerritJenkinsGithub#Submit_Changes_in_master_to_milestone-proposed15:08
jd__the first one already have a fix to review15:08
jd__ttx: what's the ultimate deadline?15:09
ttxno deadline, you're in incubation. We can do it tomorrow morning EU time15:09
jd__ok great15:10
nijabaSo, it is normally not customary to produce release notes for milestone15:10
jd__the fixes will be there before, but I'd like to test them IRL to be sure if there's enough time :)15:10
ttxnijaba: i used to do blogposts to highlight features landed in a milestone15:10
nijabahowever, since we decided earlier that this would be a folsom comptible milestone, it might still be good to announce it a bit15:10
ttxless "official"15:10
nijabaI can do it, if noone objects15:11
dhellmanna blog post sounds like a good idea15:11
eglynnyep15:11
dhellmann+115:11
nijaba#action nijaba to prepare a blogpost announcing the release15:11
nijabas/releae/milestone15:11
nijabaanyhting else regarding the release?15:12
nijabaerr milestone!!!15:12
nijabaI'll get it right someday....15:12
nijabaI guess that's a no15:12
*** john5223 has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
dhellmannnothing from me15:12
nijaba#topic Discussion about meters unit's in /meters15:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Discussion about meters unit's in /meters (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:12
jd__2 critical bugs is enough for me15:12
nijabaThere is a review in the pipe for providing meter's unit in /meter15:13
nijaba#link https://review.openstack.org/1841315:13
nijabait would be nice if we could settle on this...15:13
nijabajd__: I imagine.  thnaks for thaking care of those!15:13
nijabadhellmann: eglynn: gpernot: the floor is yours15:13
nijaba(others too, but those are the one that started the discussion)15:13
*** nealph has joined #openstack-meeting15:14
dhellmannI don't have a strong opinion. I sort of like having a unique unit name, but see the point of being consistent, too.15:14
jd__I don't have much to add, I've +2'ed, for me this is good enough :)15:14
dhellmannIf eglynn hadn't objected, I think I would have approved the code.15:14
eglynnmy preference would be not to proliferate the unit types for the 'count'-style meters15:14
eglynnbut not strong enough objection to -1 or -2 the patch15:14
nijabaeglynn: I see some value in providing some understanding of what is counted for gauges15:15
eglynnnijaba: my thought was that this understanding was already encapsulated in the meter name15:16
nijabaeglynn: what about using a coming "gauge:" prefix15:16
eglynnnijaba: as in, guage:images or gauge:packets?15:16
nijabaeglynn: ie "gauge:instances"15:17
jd__why that?15:17
nijabaeglynn: yes15:17
eglynnnijaba: I'm not sure that would really improve matters much15:17
nijabajd__: to simplofy machine processing of units, normalizing is useful15:17
jd__unit is totally unrelated to the type of measure15:17
dhellmannIIRC, all of the units in dispute were for the things we were counting, right?15:17
nijabayep15:18
eglynnnijaba: there being no scaling factor for these gauges, the unit is always going to be a bit redundant15:18
jd__counting the fact the the weather is +2 Celcius degree (delta) or 24 C (gauge) doesn't change the unit :)15:18
eglynndhellmann: yep15:18
*** mrodden has quit IRC15:18
nijabajd__: point taken15:18
nijabaso, what should we do?15:19
jd__the point of using 'instance' and 'container' rather than None is that you can know that you can't compare or add these two things because it has no sense (apples and bananas)15:19
eglynnjd__: can we compare/sum over different meters anyway?15:19
dhellmannI've seen other systems use "each" as a unit for counted things, where the thing is described elsewhere15:19
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
eglynnCW uses 'Count' and 'Count/second'15:20
jd__eglynn: nothing stops you to do that, and it's simpler if you know the unit (you can check what you're doing)15:20
dhellmanneglynn: that's a good word, too15:20
eglynnjd__: so you could say sum over image.download and image.serve?15:21
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC15:21
*** blamar has quit IRC15:21
eglynnjd__: (both with unit=images in that patch IIRC)15:21
yjiang5_homenijaba: I'd suggest to extend this patch to g3, considering this is in fact part of the API, or we can change this in future without backward compatibility?15:21
jd__eglynn: sounds like a good example, if you want to charge for both for example or aggregate for stats :)15:21
nijabayjiang5_home: it has already been moved to g315:21
yjiang5_home:)15:22
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
eglynnjd__: OK, I didn't realize you could do that ...15:22
jd__eglynn: but if you know the unit, you can makes the API raises an error because unit are != if you're trying to add image.serve and swift container :)15:22
gpernotjd__: i don't like using the unit for validation15:23
jd__gpernot: you prefer to return wrong values?15:23
eglynnjd__: OK, that's one decent justification for this approach15:23
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
gpernotnetwork.outgoing, may have 2 counters with same unis, counting different things...15:23
jd__eglynn: thanks :)15:23
jd__gpernot: then you can select the unit you want, no?15:23
eglynnsmart validation would also need to take into account scaling conversion15:24
dhellmannI think we need to require that a given meter is always measured in the same units from all data sources15:24
eglynne.g. Kb + Mb OK, Kb + bananas not OK15:24
jd__eglynn: yes, but I think we agreed to keep SI unit (meaning second, and not ns) that means the pollster needs to convert to SI if needed15:24
eglynnjd__: CPU time is already in ns IIRC15:24
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
*** lbragstad has quit IRC15:24
gpernotdhellmann: +115:24
jd__eglynn: yes, actually I think it's better to say 'B' and not 'KB' or 'MB'15:25
jd__eglynn: I know, that should be considered as a bug IMHO15:25
dhellmannexactly, we should be recording the data in the smallest unit we have availble, and let the API caller convert to something else if they want15:25
jd__dhellmann: what would be the reason?15:25
eglynnAFAIK in CW if you ask for a bytes metric in Gb say, it'll do the conversion before returning15:25
dhellmannjd__: simplicity of our implementation15:25
gpernotjd__:ease of use for client apps ?15:25
nijabajd__: granularity15:25
jd__dhellmann: I think all unit have decimal, so smallest isn't a good criteria, SI is much better I think :)15:26
dhellmannjd__: I mean if we have access to ns, we should store and use that, rather than seconds15:26
jd__dhellmann: oh sure!15:26
jd__nobody will suggest to drop information :)15:26
dhellmannand we should only return values to the caller in the units we have them in, no conversions15:26
eglynnno rounding basically, right?15:26
gpernoteglynn:sure15:27
dhellmannthe API implementation shouldn't even be worried about units. it has numbers and it does math on them, that's it.15:27
eglynnno conversion => so if I ask for the sum of a meter in Kb and another in Gb, that's an error?15:27
dhellmannthe units are  provided as a convenience for the api user15:27
dhellmanneglynn: I don't think we want to provide a way for the API user to specify the units they want at all.15:27
dhellmannthey'll take what we give them, and be happy! :-)15:28
eglynnlol15:28
jd__lol15:28
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
jd__eglynn: all meters should be in bytes, so what you describe will raise an error ultimately yes15:28
eglynnbut if one meter stored as Gb and another as Kb, these could be summable, or?15:28
dhellmanneglynn: there is not currently an API for computing values across meters15:28
* nijaba votes for using uk royal units 15:28
* nijaba runs15:28
dhellmannand I don't think we need one15:29
* jd__ shots nijaba 15:29
eglynndhellmann: I thought jd__ said that is currently supported?15:29
eglynn(cross-meter aggregation)15:29
eglynnIIUC15:29
jd__I don't know if it is in v2, it may be?15:29
dhellmannhe's suggesting that we do it, but we do not now and I don't think it's necessary15:29
dhellmannno, the meter specification in the v2 api is one at a time15:30
jd__I don't know if it's necessary but I don't want to close doors too soon15:30
eglynna-ha, OK ... that seemed like the best argument for needing the specific unit for the counts15:30
jd__especially if it's quite cheap to keep them open for later15:30
dhellmannjd__: the problem is, as we've shown in this discussion, it's not cheap15:30
jd__considering how the scope of the project is elarging :)15:30
*** spn is now known as Guest4186315:30
*** spn has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
dhellmannyou have to know a lot more about the meter, and whether the measurements can be combined15:31
dhellmannthat's info the caller will have implicitly, but we would need to make explicit15:31
dhellmannthat complicates our implementations, especially the storage backend that is doing all of the actual work15:31
dhellmannif we let the caller do it, they  just have to make 2 calls15:31
eglynntrue that, adding network I/O requests makes sense, adding network and disk requests less so ...15:31
*** spn is now known as spn_15:31
*** markvan_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
dhellmannright15:32
dhellmannthe API is still mostly about metering, afaict15:32
dhellmannthe15:32
dhellmann m15:32
dhellmannthe new monitoring stuff is going to go through the new publishing pipelines, right?15:32
*** spn has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
eglynnyep15:32
nijabadhellmann: +1.  multi-publisher will imply othe api access15:32
dhellmannfor billing you want to list line-items anyway15:33
jd__until someone wants to build a monitoring stuff on top of ceilometer-api15:33
jd__:)15:33
dhellmannso even if you charge for network and disk i/o, you want those pulled out15:33
nijabajd__: which would not make sense15:33
dhellmannjd__: polling that API isn't going to be a good way to monitor :-)15:33
jd__by monitor, I mean things like graphing15:34
*** markvan has quit IRC15:34
*** markvan_ is now known as markvan15:34
eglynnbringing it back to units, asalkeld made a good point about describing the units somewhere15:34
eglynn(on gerrit)15:34
eglynnusing the SNMP MIB as an example15:34
eglynndo we need something of that ilk?15:34
eglynni.e. to make it clear that B = 'bytes'15:34
eglynnetc.15:35
jd__MIB implies machine-parsable, right?15:35
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
eglynnI think so15:35
dhellmannwe have it documented, do we need a machine-parsable version?15:35
dhellmannhow would it help to provide a mapping between "B" and "bytes"?15:35
jd__I don't see a use case15:35
eglynnyeah, docco probably suffices15:35
eglynnso if I need to start counting something new, the process would be15:36
eglynnadd the meter with a newly invented unit15:36
eglynnand step 2, update the docco15:36
dhellmannwe could, eventually, generate that list of meters and units from the plugins when we build the docs15:36
dhellmannwe would need to expand the API for the plugins a bit, but not in complicated ways15:37
dhellmannbut yes, for now, it's 2 steps15:37
eglynnk, seems reasonable as long as we follow that convention15:37
jd__fine with me too :)15:37
dhellmannso to clarify, does that mean we agreed to use unique units for counting, instead of "count"?15:38
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
*** juice has quit IRC15:38
eglynnyep, grugingly ;)15:38
dhellmannok :-)15:38
eglynnso lets get 18413 landed, could we sneak it in for g-2 at this late stage?15:39
eglynnor OK just retargeting to g-3?15:39
dhellmannthe other thing I wasn't sure about with that change was having the units included in every counter15:39
dhellmanneglynn: I think it has already been retargeted, no?15:39
eglynna-ha, yes it was ...15:39
dhellmannincluding the units in the counter means there isn't a need to explicitly declare a meter before something starts publishing data to it. that seems appealing, but is that what we want?15:40
jd__dhellmann: that also buys you the ability to change unit in time or to know that unit changed15:40
dhellmannjd__: right, that gets back to my earlier point: we don't want the units being changed15:41
yjiang5_homedhellmann: in fact, there is a user requireed in IRC to know all meter information before the counter published15:41
eglynnjd__: shouldn't the unit really be immutable?15:41
jd__ok but the fact is that there's no check anywhere that the unit is always the same15:41
jd__so an external probe can send counters and suddently change units15:42
jd__nothing indicates it's a problem15:42
eglynnbut changing it would surely break the aggregation logic?15:42
dhellmannjd__: yes, so we have to document that restriction15:42
nijabaeglynn: for sure15:42
jd__eglynn: if it specifies different unit, why should it be broken?15:42
dhellmannit shouldn't be an issue in practice15:42
eglynnjd__: can't add say bytes and seconds15:42
dhellmanncan we say, for the grizzly release, that we're not going to deal with changing units at all? we have enough other things to do15:43
jd__I agree that there's 3 different ways to fix this: 1. write in the doc that this will break your installation 2. check at record time that the unit is always the same 3. handle it correctly when doing computing and request in the API15:43
dhellmannif we want to start getting fancy with error detection or even unit conversion, we can discuss those things for H?15:43
nijabaok, I think we have settled on using names for units instead of count or each. right?  Then we can thave another meeting about the unti policy, which the patch in review does not depend on?15:43
jd__dhellmann: that sounds like option 1, fine with me :)15:44
eglynnyep agreed, punt to H, stick to #1 for now15:44
jd__nijaba: yes15:44
dhellmannjd__: cool15:44
*** Barath_ has quit IRC15:44
yjiang5_homedepends on doc is always not so good IMHO.15:44
jd__yjiang5_home: I'd prefer option 3 too, but we can start with option 1 anyway :)15:44
yjiang5_homejd__: why not 2?15:44
jd__it's better than nothing15:45
jd__yjiang5_home: likely because I like to do complicated things :-))15:45
yjiang5_homehehe :)15:45
nijabawe need to move on15:45
* dhellmann nods15:45
nijaba#agreed use name of for units that provide counts, instead of count or each15:45
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** spn has quit IRC15:46
yjiang5_homejd__:  I have a question to the keystone bug. Is it caused by keystoneclient change in last minutes for g2 milestone, or because we didn't catch it in our test?15:46
nijaba#action nijaba to start a thread on ml about unit policy15:46
nijaba#topic Ceilometer and Healthmon15:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Ceilometer and Healthmon (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:46
*** afrittoli has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
jd__yjiang5_home: let me answer on #openstack-metering15:46
yjiang5_homejd__: sure.15:46
llu-laptopI saw Barath_ online15:47
nijaballu-laptop: looks like he dropped off15:47
nijabadivakar too15:47
nijaba:(15:47
nijabaso I guess we are back to my action to get in touch with them to see if they agree on llu-laptop plan?15:48
llu-laptopBarath_ just pinged me to give me their email address and want to talk about that in email.15:48
nijaballu-laptop: sounds good.  do you want to start the discussion, putting the ml in cc?15:48
llu-laptopyes. I'll drop them the mail and cc the ml.15:49
nijaballu-laptop: thanks a lot!15:50
nijaba#agreed llu-laptop to initiate conversation with healthmon15:50
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy15:50
nijaba#topic Bugshashing day retrospective. what worked, what didn't, what we should consider doing differently next time ... etc.15:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugshashing day retrospective. what worked, what didn't, what we should consider doing differently next time ... etc. (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:50
nijabaas I was not there, I do not have much to say15:51
nijabajd__: ?15:51
jd__yeah, I think we did quite a good job to fix some bugs15:51
eglynnone thing asalkeld mentioned before was that the choice of day was bad for APAC contributions15:51
jd__but I didn't see anyone from outside the project15:51
eglynni.e. Friday bleeds into their w/e15:51
dhellmannyeah, maybe next time we can pick a Tuesday or Wednesday15:51
jd__eglynn: ah good to know indeed, didn't think about that15:51
eglynnso next time I think a Tuesday or Wednesday would be better15:51
eglynnyep15:52
dhellmannjd__: no, I didn't either15:52
eglynnagree with jd__ that the lack of randomers disappointing15:52
nijabajan 4th did not help much for randommer15:53
jd__some stats are still online at http://www.naquadah.org/~jd/bugdaystats/output/ceilometer.html FTR15:53
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
eglynnmaybe we need to seed the backlog with some more juicy/tempting/interesting-looking bugs next time15:53
dhellmannso we didn't gain new contributors, but we did fix bugs and learned about how to run one of these things15:53
dhellmannI count that as at least a partial success :-)15:53
eglynnyep agreed15:53
eglynnlets do it again before g315:53
jd__sure :)15:53
dhellmann+115:54
eglynnmaybe with a longer lead-in time15:54
dhellmannand not next to a holiday15:54
dhellmannor weekend15:54
nijabashould we poikc the date now?15:54
jd__why not15:54
dhellmannsure, when is the g3 date again?15:55
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
nijabaG3 is Feb 21st15:55
* eglynn has jury duty the week of Feb 11th15:55
nijabaso a week before that is feb 11th.15:55
*** EmilienM__ has quit IRC15:55
nijabawhich would put eglynn out15:55
eglynnyep15:55
dhellmannwhat about the week before that, then?15:56
eglynnworks for me15:56
dhellmannis that too soon?15:56
nijababut then feb 3rd is really close15:56
*** sarob has quit IRC15:56
nijaba3 weeks away15:56
eglynnyeah, that's a point15:56
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** YehiaBeyh has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
dhellmannthe 7th would be 2 weeks before the g3 deadline15:56
nijabaand eglynn as a LOT of bp to do15:56
eglynnactually I can prolly join in after GMT EoD during the week of the 11th15:57
dhellmannmaybe we should wait until after g3 then? do something before the release?15:57
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
eglynnthat would work too15:57
eglynnduring the pre-final stabilization period15:57
dhellmannwe are supposed to be done with features by then, right? so fixing bugs makes sense.15:58
eglynnexactly15:58
nijabaright15:58
nijabaMarch 7 then?15:58
nijabaRC start on march 14th15:58
jd__I'll be on vacation from 6th to 17th March15:59
dhellmannI'll be at PyCon US from 12-18th15:59
jd__nijaba: otherwise, doodle? :)15:59
eglynnwould March 5th work?15:59
eglynn(for jd__)16:00
nijabamarch 5th seeems good16:00
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
jd__fine with me16:00
dhellmannsure16:00
eglynncool16:00
nijaba#agreed next bug squashing day on march 5th!16:00
nijaba#topic Open Discussion16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"16:01
nijabaany quick topics as we are already past the hour?16:01
dhellmannnothing here16:01
yjiang5_homeno16:01
eglynnnowt from me16:01
llu-laptopno16:01
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net16:01
jd__nop16:02
egallenAny specs for meter-post-api ?16:02
nijabagreat. So thanks again for a great meeting everyone. See you next week on wednesday at 21UTC16:02
jd__egallen: not yet16:02
nijaba#endmeeting16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"16:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jan 10 16:02:42 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-01-10-15.00.html16:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-01-10-15.00.txt16:02
*** joesavak has quit IRC16:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-01-10-15.00.log.html16:02
*** llu-laptop has quit IRC16:03
YehiaBeyhhas the Ceilometer meeting started- or did I miss it and it just ended?16:03
dhellmannYehiaBeyh: it just ended ;-(16:03
jd__it just ended YehiaBeyh16:03
nijabaYehiaBeyh: just ended16:03
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
YehiaBeyhI thought it starts at 11EST (1600 UTC)16:04
jd__YehiaBeyh: anyway feel free to join #openstack-metering to chat16:04
jd__YehiaBeyh: 1500 UTC actually16:04
YehiaBeyhI just had one question regarding the healthnmon action16:04
YehiaBeyhnijaba to get in touch with the healthmon team to see what their reaction is to our plan for integration16:05
dhellmannI think someone else will be wanting this room shortly. Join us in #openstack-metering?16:05
YehiaBeyhok - thx16:05
*** eharney has quit IRC16:08
*** yjiang5_home has left #openstack-meeting16:10
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC16:13
*** YehiaBeyh has left #openstack-meeting16:13
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** lauria has joined #openstack-meeting16:15
*** hemna has quit IRC16:16
*** jesusaurus has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** zyluo has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** sarob has quit IRC16:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** joesavak has quit IRC16:24
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:26
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC16:26
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** dolphm has quit IRC16:30
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** patelna_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n316:48
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez16:49
*** maurosr_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** maurosr has quit IRC16:49
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** egallen has left #openstack-meeting16:52
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC16:55
*** markvan_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** markvan has quit IRC16:57
*** markvan_ is now known as markvan16:57
*** eharney_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** eharney has quit IRC16:59
*** eharney_ is now known as eharney16:59
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
jaypipes#startmeeting qa17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jan 10 17:00:14 2013 UTC.  The chair is jaypipes. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: qa)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'17:00
jaypipeswelcome all.17:00
mtreinishjaypipes: hi17:00
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
ravikumar_hpjaypipes:hi17:00
jaypipesmlavalle: hi miguel17:00
mlavalleHi everybody17:00
zyluohi17:00
jaypipeszyluo: hi!17:01
jaypipesdavidkranz: around?17:01
jaypipessdague: ?17:01
mtreinishjaypipes: sdague can't make it today17:01
davidkranzjaypipes: Here.17:01
jaypipeskk17:01
* jaypipes would like to thanks everyone, including ravikumar_hp and mtreinish for closing out bugs and updating blueprint statuses. very helpful.17:02
*** nealph has left #openstack-meeting17:02
jaypipesunfortunately, we struggled yesterday diagnosing (but I think now fixed) issues with transient failures17:02
jaypipesthose failures seem to be cleared up now, and jenkins is straining with a big backlog of full tempest runs to complete.17:03
*** donaldngo has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** almaisan-away has quit IRC17:03
*** mrodden has quit IRC17:03
jaypipes#topic open reviews17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "open reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"17:03
jaypipes#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest,n,z17:03
*** donaldngo has quit IRC17:03
*** donaldngo has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
jaypipesravikumar_hp: wanna give a quick status on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18775/ ?17:04
ravikumar_hpjust one more review/approval is needed17:04
ravikumar_hpit looks good. can you approve17:05
ravikumar_hpjaypipes:17:05
ravikumar_hp all review feedback incorporated. and Jenkins also ran fine17:05
jaypipesok, will do a final review on that shortly...17:06
jaypipesravikumar_hp: thx17:06
jaypipeshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/19033/ is still being discussed on the mailing list and with lifeless17:06
jaypipeszyluo: how are we on reconciling all the quantum tempest efforts?17:08
zyluoyeah we have to sync up today17:08
jaypipeszyluo: you and maru?17:09
zyluoso well work together on the two BPs and when things get sorted out I'll send out a mail17:09
zyluomlavalle,17:09
*** anniec has quit IRC17:09
mlavallejaypipes: I sent an email earlier this week with an inventory of Quantum BP's17:09
zyluodidn't get to talk with maru yet17:09
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: are we going to include quantum tests nightly/gated tests?17:09
jaypipesmlavalle: indeed, sorry I have not had a chance to respond :(17:10
mlavallejaypipes: I think it is close to be comprehensive17:10
jaypipesravikumar_hp: I'd like to ASAP.17:10
jaypipesravikumar_hp:  they are run as non-voting jobs already, but only quantum smoke tests...17:10
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: thanks17:11
mlavalleravikumar_hp: please respond to my email with the BP's you have, so we complete the inventory17:11
ravikumar_hpmlavalle: sure. will check17:12
clarkbjaypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19154/ is ready when everyone else is17:12
jaypipesclarkb: cool, thx :)17:12
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
mlavalleclarkb: I'll include this in the Quantum inventory17:13
jaypipesalright folks, everyone please try to do as many reviews as you can on the remaining outstanding reviews, and mark "recheck" for stuff that seems to be stuck on unrelated failures.17:14
jaypipesI'll try to do my best to get through reviews today, but I'm stuck in lots of meetings (starting soon)17:14
*** joesavak has quit IRC17:14
*** bencherian has quit IRC17:15
jaypipesunless anyone objects, I'd like to wrap up this week early, so if anyone has particular topics to discuss, please do bring them up now.17:15
davidkranzjaypipes: I will get to some reviews.17:15
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: i have one topic17:15
mtreinishjaypipes: I've got a quick update on coverage reports17:15
ravikumar_hpwriting negative tests17:16
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:16
jaypipesin order, mtreinish please update, then ravikumar_hp17:16
mtreinishok, https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/periodic-tempest-devstack-coverage-vm-full/ the daily jobs are running now. (but failing on an import error)17:17
mtreinishonce that error gets sorted out we'll have daily full tempest runs with coverage reports17:17
mtreinishthey get put in the logs directory for the run17:17
jaypipesvery nice.17:18
jaypipeslooking forward to this.17:18
mtreinishjaypipes: yeah so am I, its been a long time coming17:19
jaypipesravikumar_hp: ?17:19
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: We wanted to parameterize rather than writing negative/boundary tests using some tool . Any update?17:19
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
jaypipesravikumar_hp: no, it's slipped and slipped.17:20
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: ok17:20
jaypipesravikumar_hp: do you have resources that could work on fuzz testing tool like randgen?17:20
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
ravikumar_hpjaypipes: we will explore17:21
jaypipesravikumar_hp: thx17:21
jaypipesok folks, anything else on the docket?17:21
jesusaurusi have a quick question, is anyone in this meeting using the tests under tempest/stress/ ?17:21
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
jaypipesjesusaurus: davidkranz is.17:22
davidkranzI haven't been using them in a while. I was waiting for the "errors in logs with successful runs" bugs to be fixed.17:23
jaypipes++17:23
jesusaurusokay, i'll sync up with him at some point. i have some tests of my own i want to merge in17:23
jesusaurusand i want to discuss the general framework as well17:23
ravikumar_hpjesusaurus: that will help17:23
davidkranzjesusaurus: Please do.17:23
*** darraghb has quit IRC17:24
jesusaurusdavidkranz: ping me when you have some time to discuss the stress tests' architecture17:24
jaypipesOK, see you all next week, sorry for the shortened meeting.17:24
jaypipes#endmeeting17:24
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"17:24
mlavalleHave a nice week you all17:24
zyluobye17:24
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jan 10 17:24:46 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:24
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-01-10-17.00.html17:24
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-01-10-17.00.txt17:24
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-01-10-17.00.log.html17:24
davidkranzjesusaurus: What time zone are you?17:24
*** hemna has quit IRC17:25
jesusaurusdavidkranz: pst17:26
*** donaldngo has quit IRC17:26
ravikumar_hpdavidkranz: I think those stress tests may be added as jenkins and run once a week after the issue is resolved17:26
ravikumar_hpjesusaurus: where is bayarea?17:26
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
ravikumar_hpI am in Sunnyvale.17:26
jesusaurusim in seattle17:27
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
ravikumar_hpjesusaurus: ok . we are same company..17:28
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC17:28
*** ravikumar_hp has quit IRC17:32
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting17:33
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** sarob has quit IRC17:34
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net17:36
*** annegentle_itsme has quit IRC17:36
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** ndipanov has quit IRC17:42
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** zyluo has quit IRC17:53
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:53
*** hemna has quit IRC17:57
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net18:00
*** markwash has quit IRC18:01
*** martine has quit IRC18:01
*** frankm has quit IRC18:01
*** arosen has quit IRC18:01
*** llu has quit IRC18:01
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** frankm has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:10
*** dhellmann has quit IRC18:11
*** blamar has quit IRC18:13
*** derekh has quit IRC18:17
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC18:20
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting18:21
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:21
*** EmilienM has quit IRC18:25
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
*** jsavak has quit IRC18:36
*** dolphm has quit IRC18:36
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away18:37
*** vkmc has quit IRC18:37
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:40
*** SpamapS has left #openstack-meeting18:41
*** dprince has quit IRC18:43
*** rnirmal has quit IRC18:44
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC18:56
*** rnirmal has quit IRC18:57
lifelessjaypipes: o/18:58
jaypipeslifeless: sorry man, knee deep in PKI right now :(18:59
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:59
*** rohitk has quit IRC18:59
lifelessjaypipes: no worries, just saw the reference in backlog18:59
*** bearovercloud has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
*** blamar has quit IRC19:07
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
*** annegentle_itsme has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
*** mrunge has quit IRC19:30
*** kaganos has quit IRC19:32
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
*** anniec has quit IRC19:33
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec19:33
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
*** juice has quit IRC19:34
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
*** bencherian has quit IRC19:35
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away19:37
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul19:37
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** blamar has quit IRC19:37
*** anniec has quit IRC19:37
*** kaganos has quit IRC19:37
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting19:39
*** anniec_ has quit IRC19:40
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** dolphm has quit IRC19:41
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting19:42
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away19:52
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net19:55
*** darraghb has quit IRC19:57
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** joshuamckenty has quit IRC20:00
*** anniec has quit IRC20:02
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec20:02
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC20:02
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** bencherian has quit IRC20:04
*** kaganos has quit IRC20:08
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** vkmc has quit IRC20:13
*** jgriffith has quit IRC20:15
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting20:15
*** eglynn has quit IRC20:16
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** woodspa has quit IRC20:22
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul20:24
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC20:27
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** annegentle_itsme has quit IRC20:29
*** anniec has quit IRC20:29
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
*** bencherian has quit IRC20:31
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC20:32
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting20:39
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting20:43
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
*** anniec has quit IRC20:44
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec20:44
*** ayoung has quit IRC20:52
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
*** dhellmann has quit IRC20:58
*** sarob has quit IRC20:58
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC20:58
*** anniec has quit IRC20:59
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** ijw has quit IRC21:00
*** eglynn has quit IRC21:00
vishy#startmeeting nova21:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jan 10 21:01:04 2013 UTC.  The chair is vishy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"21:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'21:01
russellbhi!21:01
vishy#chair russellb21:01
openstackCurrent chairs: russellb vishy21:01
vishywe don't really have anything on the agenda21:01
russellb#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/Nova21:01
vishy:)21:01
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
russellbheh, yeah.21:01
roaetthanks for the blueprint approval!21:01
russellbI guess we can talk about bugs for a moment21:02
*** dwcramer has quit IRC21:02
vishyrussellb: sounds good21:02
vishy#topic bugs21:02
russellb#link http://webnumbr.com/untouched-nova-bugs21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"21:02
russellbuntouched bugs is up to 4821:02
russellbcreeped up over the holidays, not surprising21:02
russellbso, just need some folks to put that back on their weekly to-do to help triage a few21:02
russellbthat's pretty much all i wanted to point out ...21:03
*** Mr_T has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
russellbany other bug discussion?21:04
jog0russellb: yeah21:04
jog0was hoping to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075716 backported to Folsom21:04
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1075716 in nova "Soft delete does update quotas correctly" [Undecided,Fix released]21:04
russellbhave you proposed it?21:05
jog0as its user facing bug that is easy to hit in production.21:05
jog0russellb: working on it now, its not a completely trivial backport though21:05
russellbi don't think you need to wait for someone else to backport it if it's important to ou21:05
russellbgotcha21:05
*** danwent has quit IRC21:06
jog0if johannes or someone else  who worked on quota is around, help would be appreceated21:06
russellbso, want me to target to folsom and assign to you?21:06
jog0russellb: sure21:06
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
russellbjog0: k done21:07
jog0russellb: thanks21:07
*** aabes has quit IRC21:07
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC21:08
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away21:08
russellbI guess another bug note ... since we're now in the grizzly-3 cycle, we should definitely be watching out for bugs that we want to make sure get fixed in grizzly (and target them to grizzly-3 for now?)21:08
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul21:08
russellbneed to start narrowing in on what the final release is going to look like21:09
westmaascomstud: do you remember anyone else that looked at quotas?21:09
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles21:09
russellbany other bug discussion?21:10
*** s1rp has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
russellbok then.21:11
russellb#topic grizzly-321:11
*** openstack changes topic to "grizzly-3 (Meeting topic: nova)"21:11
russellbgrizzly-3 is Feb 21, that'll be here faster than we think :)21:12
russellbthat's also feature freeze, in theory21:12
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
russellbwe have way more blueprints than will get done, realistically ... https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/grizzly-321:12
russellbif you have cycles, take a look for something to volunteer for21:12
dimsrussellb, so only bugs after 21st?21:12
russellbdims: that's the idea, only bugs without an exception21:12
dimsk21:13
russellbyou can ask for a feature freeze exception, but don't count on it21:13
russellbespecially with  nova, we'll be busy enough with bugs that overloading ourselves with feature exceptions isn't ideal21:13
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
dimsunderstood21:14
russellblooks like all blueprints are assigned, technically21:14
russellbbut if something looks interesting, don't hestitate to contact whoever is assigned and offer to help21:14
russellbi guess that's it on that ...21:14
russellb#topic Open Discussion21:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"21:15
russellbSo, I feel like attendance has been kind of light to this meeting in general ...21:15
russellbis there something we can be doing to make this more useful?21:16
*** anniec has quit IRC21:16
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec21:16
russellbwould like to encourage more attendance and participation.21:16
jog0add a meeting reminder to the ML21:16
vishyrussellb: seems like there is more early in the cycle21:16
vishyrussellb: while we are planning things out21:16
russellbyeah, true.21:17
mikalAlso, I'm here, I just haven't had anything to say21:17
russellbjog0: yeah, I usually send one.  I didn't today (and attendence seems lighter than usual, too)21:17
vishyseems like now it is mostly implementation and reviews21:17
dimsand asking for reviews :)21:17
vishy45 blueprints in g-3 seems totally reasonable :)21:18
russellbcool, well, i'm happy to put in work outside of the meeting if there's something i can do to make it more useful, happy to hear ideas if anyone has them at some point21:18
russellbvishy: really?21:18
russellbsarcasm is hard to detect on IRC, heh.21:18
* vishy is dripping with sarcasm21:18
guitarzansmell the sarcasm!21:18
russellbexcellent.21:18
russellbwell I guess as long as everyone is aware of the deadline21:19
vishythis looks interesting https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18462/21:19
russellband for the love of (*&#$(#@, please don't show up with a massive patch 2 days before the deadline21:19
russellbwe had multiple instances of that with folsom21:19
vishyi keep missing stuff since i turned off my notification of every single commit21:19
beaglesdefine massive ;)21:19
russellbbeagles: thousands of lines21:19
russellbi can haz merge?21:20
beaglesugh21:20
russellbi know you have 100 other open reviews and i just dropped this, but  ...21:20
* russellb reads about utilization-based-scheduling21:21
dimsas a new comer, i end up staring at reviews of my patches to see if there was any movement, i am slowly learning to peel my eyes away from them. any tips?21:21
comstudwhoops21:21
russellbcomstud: ;)21:22
rmkdims: I'd say it's fair to expect to have to wait a bit but also fair to ping people for reviews if it sits too long21:22
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
comstudtime flies when fixing bugs21:22
westmaascomstud highlights on (*&#$(#@21:22
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
comstudlol21:22
rmkIt's not as glamorous to review which is why they take along time, everyone prefers to write new code :)21:22
dims:)21:22
russellbsometimes i prefer to review, oddly21:22
russellbthough i haven't been reviewing as much as usual lately ... need to kick it back up21:23
vishydims: also is useful to ping people that you know will be interested21:23
rmkOr always ping vish like I do21:23
rmkjk21:24
russellbrmk: nice.21:24
vishylike if they touched the code around where you are editing21:24
dimsvishy, right. i am trying to get to know folks :)21:24
rmkI like the idea of utilization based scheduling21:24
rmkWe have related problems to solve21:25
rmkSay you're using utilization based but have a bunch of suspended VMs all over the place.. we never reschedule21:25
* dims says thanks for the tips21:26
russellban interesting thing to add to the scheduling mix for sure21:26
russellbi like it21:27
rmknods21:27
russellbwelp ... anything else for open discussion?  reviews anyone wants to plug?21:27
russellblight meeting today.21:27
russellbwho wants to help comstud get the rest of cells in?21:27
russellb:)21:27
rmkI haven't looked closely at this patch but how much historical utilization data does it take into account?21:28
rmkis it just a point-in-time utilization snapshot?21:28
rmkAt first glance it looks like it is21:28
*** gyee has quit IRC21:29
russellbnah, it has a window of samples21:29
russellbsee AveragingProfiler in the compute resource_tracker21:29
comstudeveryone wants to help me21:30
comstudright!?21:30
comstudtechnically there's still more I don't have up for review yet ;)21:30
russellbheh, ok but seriously, grizzly-3, we have *got* to have it all in21:30
russellbcomstud: start raging at people to review21:31
* russellb should review the rest i guess21:31
comstudrussellb: yeah, i rage at you first.21:31
comstud()!*$()!@*$21:31
russellbrmk: i see that it's keeping 10 samples by default, but not sure how often that is21:31
rmkinteresting21:32
sdaguecomstud: is there going to be a new rev of cells for devstack?21:35
*** ravikumar_hp has quit IRC21:35
russellbrmk: every run of periodic tasks, so roughly once a minute21:35
comstudsdague: not sure, i wasn't the one working on it21:35
comstudi assume the answer is yes at some point here21:36
russellbrmk: took me a while to dig for that, heh21:36
alaskiI wrote the first version of cells on devstack.  I haven't looked into what's changed with cells recently but I can work on getting together an update21:36
rmkrussellb: cool thanks..21:37
russellbdoesn't seem like the usage has changed, really21:37
rmkGoing to look at this some more21:37
russellbrmk: cool :)21:37
russellbcomstud cleaned up the code, but didn't seem like the config and such changed, so hopefully it just still works21:37
comstudalaski: shouldn't be much externally.. except the API extension21:37
* dansmith staggers in21:38
devanandaanyone want to poke at 19077, adding a REST API for baremetal?21:38
russellbdansmith: slacker!21:38
russellbdansmith: jk <321:38
alaskicool, I'll test it out and update if necessary.  And push up a review at some point.21:38
dansmithrussellb: my lotus notes calendar doesn't understand UTC, so I correct in my head.. and lost track today :D21:39
russellbzomg time zones21:39
russellbdansmith: not sure how much you saw in #openstack-nova ... i started an rpc based servicegroup driver, but realized there's still a lot of direct service db access scattered around, so it's going to be more difficult than i thought21:41
dansmithrussellb: yeah, not surprised.. like the thing comstud is working on right now21:42
russellbdansmith: i may just do a conductor db proxy approach as the first pass like we did everything else ...21:42
dansmithrussellb: okay21:42
dansmithI've been trying to start digging into finding some of those hidden dragons for two days, but keep getting distracted21:42
russellball good, i know how it goes21:43
russellbnova party at dansmith's house in April?  :-p21:43
dansmithheh21:44
russellbnever been to portland, so looking forward to it21:44
comstuddansmith: it seems silly to pass an insanely large message with full instance model when the DB only needs the uuid21:44
dansmithI try to avoid it at all costs, so don't expect me to know my way around or anything :D21:44
comstuddansmith: but I see other calls do this21:44
comstudoops, wrong chan21:44
comstud:)21:44
dansmithheh21:45
* comstud forgot we were having a meeting21:45
russellbcomstud: yeah we've been pretty much doing that everywhere21:45
russellbcomstud: well the meeting doesn't really have a topic right now21:45
russellbit's like ... #openstack-nova ... but logged?21:45
comstudhaha21:45
russellbi guess we can move back over :)21:45
russellbany last meeting worthy topics?21:45
russellbif you have any agenda requests, update the wiki before next week21:46
russellbor ping me and i'll add it if you don't feel like it, heh21:46
russellbkthxbye.21:46
russellb#endmeeting21:46
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"21:46
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jan 10 21:46:42 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:46
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-01-10-21.01.html21:46
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-01-10-21.01.txt21:46
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-01-10-21.01.log.html21:46
*** joesavak has quit IRC21:47
russellb"For 3 easy payments of 5 reviews, your agenda item could be here!"21:48
*** arosen has quit IRC21:48
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** sarob has quit IRC22:00
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** anniec has quit IRC22:05
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec22:05
*** lauria has quit IRC22:06
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
*** kaganos has quit IRC22:07
*** rkukura has quit IRC22:08
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away22:09
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul22:14
*** mtreinish has quit IRC22:16
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n322:16
*** Gordonz has quit IRC22:17
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting22:20
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting22:20
*** Gordonz has quit IRC22:20
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting22:20
*** bearovercloud_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** beagles has quit IRC22:21
*** dprince has quit IRC22:22
*** joshuamckenty has quit IRC22:22
*** martine has quit IRC22:23
*** bearovercloud has quit IRC22:25
*** bearovercloud_ is now known as bearovercloud22:25
*** bearovercloud has quit IRC22:25
*** bearovercloud has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** dwcramer has quit IRC22:26
*** jtran has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
*** juice has quit IRC22:26
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
*** dolphm has quit IRC22:28
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** eglynn has quit IRC22:40
*** dosaboy has quit IRC22:41
*** markvan has quit IRC22:50
*** Mandell has quit IRC22:50
*** eharney has quit IRC22:54
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC22:57
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
*** blamar has quit IRC22:59
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting23:02
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away23:02
*** reed has quit IRC23:03
*** john5223 has quit IRC23:04
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** anniec has quit IRC23:05
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec23:05
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net23:05
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:10
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting23:10
*** maoy has quit IRC23:10
*** dolphm has quit IRC23:12
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting23:14
*** joshuamckenty has quit IRC23:15
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:21
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** rnirmal has quit IRC23:29
*** Gordonz has quit IRC23:32
*** anniec has quit IRC23:34
*** joshuamckenty has quit IRC23:44
*** garyTh has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** juice has quit IRC23:44
*** mattray has quit IRC23:47
*** AlanClark has quit IRC23:50
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** garyTh has quit IRC23:53
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** Mr_T has left #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!