Tuesday, 2012-12-04

*** TheEstablishment has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** jrodom has quit IRC00:03
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk00:03
*** TheEstablishment has quit IRC00:04
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:09
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** ctracey has quit IRC00:14
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** ctracey has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC00:21
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting00:25
*** lifeless has quit IRC00:27
*** gongysh has quit IRC00:30
*** Matt_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** Matt_ is now known as Guest5783800:31
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
Guest57838what time is the keystone team meeting tomorrow?00:32
*** Guest57838 is now known as Srinivas00:33
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC00:33
*** ociuhandu_ is now known as ociuhandu00:33
clarkbSrinivas: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings lists the meetings00:34
clarkblooks like 1800 UTC Tuesdays for keystone00:34
SrinivasYes.  I found the agenda too.  Thanks!00:35
*** reed has quit IRC00:38
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** Srinivas has quit IRC00:40
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting00:41
*** patelna has quit IRC00:41
*** Kaiwei has quit IRC00:41
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:46
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack01:23
jeblair#startmeeting test201:24
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 01:24:35 2012 UTC.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.01:24
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.01:24
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: test2)"01:24
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'test2'01:24
jeblair#endmeeting01:25
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"01:25
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 01:25:05 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:25
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test2/2012/test2.2012-12-04-01.24.html01:25
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test2/2012/test2.2012-12-04-01.24.txt01:25
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test2/2012/test2.2012-12-04-01.24.log.html01:25
jeblair#startmeeting test01:25
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 01:25:15 2012 UTC.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.01:25
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.01:25
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: test)"01:25
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'test'01:25
jeblairtesting one01:26
jeblair#endmeeting01:26
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"01:26
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 01:26:29 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:26
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test/2012/test.2012-12-04-01.25.html01:26
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test/2012/test.2012-12-04-01.25.txt01:26
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/test/2012/test.2012-12-04-01.25.log.html01:26
clarkbseems to work01:27
jeblairyep.  both channels are being logged01:27
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** jrodom has quit IRC01:44
*** vishy is now known as vishy_zz01:52
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting01:52
*** haleyb has left #openstack-meeting01:54
*** mnewby has quit IRC02:02
*** adjohn has quit IRC02:05
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:05
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:08
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** lloydde has quit IRC02:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:23
*** jrodom has quit IRC02:26
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC02:28
*** sarob has quit IRC02:29
*** lifeless has quit IRC02:30
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net02:31
*** dprince has quit IRC02:34
*** markwash has quit IRC02:34
*** skiarxon has quit IRC02:40
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC02:42
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** skiarxon has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** markmcclain has quit IRC02:53
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:59
*** danwent has quit IRC03:01
*** juice_afk has quit IRC03:17
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting03:20
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:41
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting03:41
*** markwash has quit IRC03:46
*** maurosr has quit IRC03:55
*** dwcramer has quit IRC03:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:01
*** Mandell has quit IRC04:05
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:08
*** shang_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:10
*** shang has quit IRC04:14
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting04:15
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** lloydde has quit IRC04:31
*** krtaylor has quit IRC04:32
*** lifeless has quit IRC04:34
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:34
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:39
*** dwcramer has quit IRC04:40
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** littleidea_ has quit IRC04:42
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting04:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** sarob has quit IRC04:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** ecarlin has quit IRC04:57
*** stevebake has quit IRC05:00
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC05:05
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting05:09
*** ewindisch has quit IRC05:17
*** lifeless has quit IRC05:37
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting05:42
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** roadTripper has quit IRC05:58
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:21
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** juice_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** lifeless has quit IRC07:34
*** mnewby has quit IRC07:40
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting07:47
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting07:48
*** afazekas has quit IRC07:53
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** jhenner has quit IRC07:55
*** littleidea_ has quit IRC07:56
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** jhenner1 has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
*** jhenner has quit IRC08:06
*** jhenner1 has quit IRC08:06
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** danwent has quit IRC08:08
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov08:10
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz08:35
*** arbrandes has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov08:37
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:02
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting09:25
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** jhenner has quit IRC09:33
*** arbrandes has quit IRC10:05
*** jkyle has quit IRC10:22
*** juice_ has quit IRC10:22
*** krtaylor has quit IRC10:23
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC10:23
*** jkyle has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** carlp-away has quit IRC10:25
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** juice_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** carlp-away has joined #openstack-meeting10:27
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting11:06
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting11:10
*** dolphm has quit IRC11:26
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting11:30
*** dhellmann-afk is now known as dhellmann11:37
*** rkukura has quit IRC11:53
*** jhenner has quit IRC12:03
*** roadTripper has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** milner has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** nubi3 has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
nubi3hay guys, any body there12:53
zykes-nubi3: when there are meetings12:53
nubi3can u help me about essex, my instance in error state12:54
zykes-nubi3: please go to #openstack for that12:56
nubi3zykes : ups,,, sory,,, but in openstack channel no body,,,12:57
nubi3<zykes-> sorry if i in wrong place12:57
nubi3i will go to openstack channel12:57
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
nubi3thanks for your info :12:57
nubi3:)12:58
*** ndipanov has quit IRC12:59
*** nubi3 has left #openstack-meeting13:00
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC13:04
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting13:05
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-afk13:27
*** dhellmann-afk is now known as dhellmann13:28
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** jhenner1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:48
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** jhenner1 has quit IRC13:50
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:52
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** stevebake has quit IRC14:03
*** stevebake_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** ndipanov has quit IRC14:15
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** jog0 has quit IRC14:18
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
*** annegentle__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** mattray has quit IRC15:22
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC15:23
*** jhenner has quit IRC15:25
*** mikal has quit IRC15:25
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** luis_fdez has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
*** spligak has joined #openstack-meeting15:37
*** primeministerp has quit IRC15:40
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting15:41
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting15:45
*** reed has quit IRC15:48
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott15:50
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** danwent has quit IRC15:57
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away16:00
*** jhenner has quit IRC16:00
primeministerpstartmeeting #hyper-v16:01
primeministerp#startmeeting hyper-v16:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 16:01:23 2012 UTC.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'16:01
primeministerpHi all16:01
EmilienMprimeministerp: hi16:01
primeministerpEmilienM: how are things going16:01
primeministerpso16:02
EmilienMprimeministerp: fine, thx :) I finally add hyper-v support in my slides at openstack in action (Paris)16:02
primeministerpEmilienM: awesome!16:02
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
EmilienM(for networking)16:02
primeministerpEmilienM: any chance to share those?16:02
alexpilottihi guys16:02
primeministerpso16:02
primeministerpI figured we start w/ some updates16:02
EmilienMprimeministerp: http://www.slideshare.net/enovance/open-stack-in-action-enovancequantum-in-action16:03
primeministerpEmilienM: execellent16:03
primeministerp#link http://www.slideshare.net/enovance/open-stack-in-action-enovancequantum-in-action16:03
primeministerpso16:03
primeministerplet's beging w/ cloud-init16:03
primeministerp#topic cloudinit16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "cloudinit (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:03
primeministerpAlessandro would you like to share your news?16:03
primeministerpso16:04
alexpilottiso here's the link :-)16:04
alexpilotti#link http://www.cloudbase.it/cloud-init-for-windows-instances/16:04
alexpilottiCLoud-init for Windows ;-)16:04
EmilienMalexpilotti: great :)16:05
alexpilottiit's implemented in Python, Apache 216:05
alexpilottithere's of course an installer16:05
alexpilottiwe started by thinking about porting Cloud-Init to Windows16:05
alexpilottibut there's too much Linux dependent code that needs to be refactored16:05
alexpilottithe idea is still to merge this code in the official cloud-init, they are very interested in it16:06
alexpilottiso, we support ConfigDriveV2 and HTTP16:06
alexpilottiand a bunch of plugins out of the box to do what you'd expect from it:16:06
luis_fdezalexpilotti: and is it feasible to merge it ?16:06
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez16:07
alexpilottiluis_fdez: it will require a couple of weeks of work16:07
alexpilottiluis_fdez: and a LOT of refactoring16:07
luis_fdezyeah I can imagine...16:07
primeministerpluis_fdez: will you be able to try it out?16:07
luis_fdezbut it's a reallly good start :)16:07
primeministerpluis_fdez: and give feedback16:07
alexpilottiwe need some help in testing it16:08
alexpilottiit works on any Hypervirsor16:08
alexpilottiand on any supported Windows version16:08
*** Mandell has quit IRC16:08
alexpilottiwe tested it mainly on HyperV16:08
luis_fdezprimeministerp: of course! this week I'm a bit busy dealing with auomated images creation but... of course I'll test it and I think use it :)16:08
primeministerpawesome16:08
alexpilottion Windows 2012 / 2008 R2 guests16:09
luis_fdezok16:09
primeministerpgreat news alessandro16:09
alexpilottiso we need help especially in testing it with the HTTP metadata service16:09
alexpilottipossibly even on KVM :-)16:09
primeministerpok16:09
primeministerpluis_fdez: is jose around?16:10
primeministerpmake sure he knows as well16:10
luis_fdezummm I'm not sure, today he was busy in a "patching campaign"hehe16:10
primeministerphehe16:10
primeministerpperfect16:10
primeministerp#topic cinder16:11
*** openstack changes topic to "cinder (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:11
primeministerppnavarro: ping16:11
pnavarropong16:11
primeministerppnavarro: any updates?16:11
primeministerpre: cinder16:11
pnavarro#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16843/ still under review16:11
pnavarroso I'd appreciate any lobby16:11
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
primeministerppnavarro: will do16:12
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
primeministerppnavarro: i'll tap alexpilotti  on the back now to let him know to review it16:12
alexpilottipnavarro: I just +1'd it16:13
alexpilottipnavarro: I'm sorry I just saw it :-)16:13
pnavarrograzie alexpilotti16:13
alexpilottipnavarro: I've travelling and now I'm sitting in a room with primeministerp16:13
primeministerppnavarro: hopefully we'll be able to get those through today16:14
pnavarrolol !16:14
primeministerp:)16:14
primeministerpwe're sitting in cambridge this week16:14
alexpilottipnavarro: next meeting will be in Provence ;-)16:14
pnavarrogreat !16:14
primeministerpmoving on16:14
primeministerp#topic quantum16:14
*** openstack changes topic to "quantum (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:14
primeministerppnavarro: how is the quantum work progressing16:14
pnavarrowell, I couldn't work this weekend, so this week I'll work hard16:15
primeministerppnavarro: woot!16:15
alexpilottipnavarro: would you like to share your repo? :-)16:16
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
pnavarrosure #link https://github.com/pnavarro/quantum16:16
pnavarroalexpilotti: did you take a look at the agent?16:16
alexpilottipnavarro: sure!16:17
alexpilottipnavarro: now that I finished with cloud-init it's gonan be priority nr 1!16:17
pnavarrocool !16:17
alexpilottithis week we'll have to work hard on the CI thing16:17
alexpilottiand then Quantum hardcore :-D16:18
primeministerpgood16:18
primeministerp#rdp16:18
primeministerp#topic rdp16:18
*** openstack changes topic to "rdp (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:18
primeministerpociuhandu: any updates on RDP?16:19
ociuhanduprimeministerp: working on that, hope to have some bits ready for testing by next week16:20
ociuhanduI'm also in the same room with alexpilotti and primeministerp so this week CI is the main thing16:21
primeministerphehe16:21
primeministerpit's a party in my tiny office16:21
primeministerp#topic ci16:21
*** openstack changes topic to "ci (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:21
primeministerpso we've started the process of building the actual CI infrastructure16:21
primeministerpyesterday was spent mostly planning and configuring hardware16:22
primeministerptoday if we can get out of meetings, we'll progress16:22
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
primeministerpto deploying the first cloud infrastructure and node configuration16:22
primeministerphopefully we'll get the CI framework up and running by thursday16:23
primeministerpmordred: we'll be pinging you around that time to ensure we're plugged in properly upstream if that's ok16:23
primeministerpso one other thing16:23
primeministerpunreleated to the technology16:24
primeministerpI have been nominated the board16:24
primeministerpso information can be seen on the candidates page16:25
primeministerpok16:25
primeministerpany other general news?16:25
primeministerpluis_fdez: any more news from CERN16:25
primeministerp...16:26
primeministerpok16:26
primeministerpif not16:26
primeministerpI'll close the meeting16:26
primeministerpthanks everyone16:26
primeministerpone sec16:26
luis_fdezno primeministerp16:26
alexpilottiso guys: vote for primeministerp!16:26
alexpilottiprimeministerp for president! :-D16:27
primeministerphaha16:27
pnavarroprimeministerp 4 a chair !16:27
alexpilotti#link https://www.openstack.org/election/2013-board-election/CandidateList/16:27
primeministerptoo kind16:27
primeministerpanyway...16:27
primeministerpon that note16:27
primeministerpbefore i turn red16:27
alexpilottihe promised free beers!16:28
primeministerphaha16:28
primeministerpok i'm ending it16:28
primeministerpbefore i get in trouble16:28
primeministerp;)16:28
primeministerp#endmeeting16:28
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"16:28
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 16:28:35 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:28
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2012/hyper_v.2012-12-04-16.01.html16:28
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2012/hyper_v.2012-12-04-16.01.txt16:28
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2012/hyper_v.2012-12-04-16.01.log.html16:28
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net16:29
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** jaypipes has quit IRC16:34
*** juice_ has quit IRC16:35
*** pnavarro has quit IRC16:35
notmynameprimeministerp: ping16:35
notmynameprimeministerp: nm. wrong person16:36
*** EmilienM has quit IRC16:40
*** metral has quit IRC16:40
*** metral has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** mestery has quit IRC16:46
*** metral_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:46
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** mestery has quit IRC16:49
*** metral has quit IRC16:50
*** metral_ is now known as metral16:50
*** mattray has quit IRC16:52
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** mestery has quit IRC16:59
*** juice_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:05
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** ewindisch has quit IRC17:07
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** markwash has quit IRC17:11
*** dendrobates has quit IRC17:19
*** dendrobates has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** dendrobates has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
*** almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan17:23
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC17:28
*** al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away17:30
*** flaper87 has quit IRC17:32
*** ewindisch has quit IRC17:45
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** kwss has joined #openstack-meeting17:50
*** rafaduran has quit IRC17:50
*** ewindisch has quit IRC17:51
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting17:55
*** dwchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
ayoungKEYSTONE!!!!111!!!One!18:00
dwchadwickhello everyone18:00
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
henrynashhi there18:00
kwsshello :)18:00
dolphmo/18:00
ayoung#startmeeting keystone18:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 18:00:50 2012 UTC.  The chair is ayoung. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
dwchadwickFYI we have just updated the attribute mapping blueprint18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:00
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
ayoung#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting18:01
dwchadwickagenda is fine for me18:02
ayoungRobot Rollcall18:02
ayoungheckj, you in today?18:02
heckjhere!~18:02
heckjSorry, was reading bugs18:02
heckj:-)18:02
heckj#startmeeting keystone18:02
openstackheckj: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress.18:02
ayoungThat is one thing you never need apologise for18:02
ayoungheckj, already started18:03
heckjOh - you already did it, sweet!18:03
dolphmlol18:03
dwchadwickYou should apologise for creating bugs :-)18:03
heckjheh18:03
ayoungdwchadwick, that would be me18:03
heckjnever18:03
* dolphm apologizes18:03
ayoungand I don't mean logging them18:03
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting18:03
ayoung#topic High priority bugs or immediate issues?18:03
*** openstack changes topic to "High priority bugs or immediate issues? (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:03
heckjfelt bad after henrynash asked me about a triaged bug and realized I hadn't done anything to triage in weeks18:03
heckj8 bugs outstanding to be triaged - working on that today18:04
*** Alex-Shulman has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
dolphmheckj: aren't you supposed to be on holiday?18:04
heckjHaven't made any progress on the memcache thing and repro work - not hard, just haven't been able to dedicate the time as yet18:04
heckjStarting tomorrow18:04
*** marek_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
* heckj shuts up now and let's Adam run this18:04
ayoungheckj, actually, since we were talking Bugs, anything on the new list that is burning?18:05
ayoungOr recently triaged?18:05
heckjjust now going through them18:05
ayoungauth_token failure if signing_dir not specified running under upstart.....not a bug18:05
ayoungLength of user_name in database too short for X.509 DNs  that is mine18:05
*** Srinivas has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
heckjThe only burning one is the periodic memcache failure due to eventlet race conditions and memcache clients at high concurrency18:06
heckj(that I know of)18:06
ayoungheckj, OK, so the long term solution for that one is the swift memcache ring, right?18:06
gyeeswift memcache ring impl seem pretty solid18:06
*** Alex-Shulman has quit IRC18:06
heckjayoung: yep - Alex Yang was getting that into openstack common - may need a "boost" to do so, then using it from there18:06
dolphmheckj: who's working to get the solution into oslo? (i believe that's the blocker on a fix, no?)18:07
dolphmheckj: (spoke too soon!)18:07
*** Alex-Shulman has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
heckjdolphm: fellow (that I don't really know) who commented on the bug18:07
heckjdolphm: he opened a blueprint against oslo - looks like he made traction for a while, then disappeared or lost interest18:07
ayoungheckj that is https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1052674  right?18:08
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1052674 in keystone "Keystone auth_token middleware should support Swift global memcache" [High,Triaged]18:08
gyeeauth_token used to take env['swift.cache']18:08
gyeedid I file that one?18:08
heckjactaully, I think there's a separate bug there - this might be a dupe18:08
*** jog0 has quit IRC18:08
gyeetrivial fix18:09
gyeeI can do it18:09
ayoung#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/105267418:09
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1052674 in keystone "Keystone auth_token middleware should support Swift global memcache" [High,Triaged]18:09
heckj#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/102012718:09
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1020127 in keystone "proxy-server Error: Second simultaneous read or write detected" [High,In progress]18:09
heckjsame intent, different bugs18:10
*** dprince has quit IRC18:10
ayounggyee, can you own this from the Keystone side?18:10
gyeesure18:10
ayoungOK,  other big issues?18:11
*** darraghb has quit IRC18:11
ayounghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New18:11
gyeebtw, I upgrade pep8 to 1.3.3 and it started to flag a bunch of new pep8 errors18:12
gyeeupgraded18:12
gyeein both keystone and keystoneclient18:12
ayounggyee, open ticket.  We'll either fix or we'll ignore18:12
gyeequestion is which version is correct? :)18:13
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
gyeeno errors from older versions of pep818:13
heckjtrying to figure out how to link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1082050 to the Ubuntu packagers crew18:13
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1082050 in keystone "Spelling errors reported on IRC" [Undecided,New]18:13
gyeemostly choking on line continuation18:13
ayoungOK, lets move on18:14
ayounglets keep open discussion for the end18:14
ayoung#topic Groups vs. attribute mappings18:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Groups vs. attribute mappings (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:15
henrynashok, so last week we approved the groups bp….and so I am starting implmentation18:15
ayoungdwchadwick, I'm guessing which side of this discussion you are going to take...18:15
henrynashdavid & I have had some conversations and Kirsty and I need to have some more18:15
*** dolphm has quit IRC18:15
dwchadwickHenry raised an issue that the attribute mapping blueprint did not mention tenants so that has been fixed now. A new version was published just before the meeting18:15
dwchadwickKristy is not starting the implementation. We plan to have the first version available by the end of the year18:16
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting18:16
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting18:16
ayoung"not"  should be "now"  right?18:16
dwchadwickIf Henry makes the changes he needs to use this for groups it should make both our works easier18:17
henrynashdwchadwick: so have been looking at that…perhaps the thing that is missing is what actually going to use the attributes to enforce permissions18:17
*** garyk has quit IRC18:17
*** derekh has quit IRC18:17
ayoungsoyeah, that is going to require buy in outside of Keystone18:17
henrynashi.e. what changes are needed elsewhere in keystone18:17
ayoungWe want to use the policy engine to support ABAC18:17
ayoungand policy engine is going to live in Oslo18:18
henrynashI would think so18:18
dwchadwickWe also have an open source policy engine that we can use18:18
ayoungSo I think the right approach is like what we did for PKI18:18
*** AlanClark has quit IRC18:18
ayoungmake it work, but disabled by default.  Make is a "seamless change" and switch the default in the H timeframe18:18
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
henrynashayoung: +118:19
ayoungdwchadwick, is that engine in Python?  It will be a non-starter if it isn't18:19
dwchadwickno, its in java18:19
gyeehaha18:19
ayoungdwchadwick, so was Keystone originally18:19
dwchadwickbut we have a python interface18:19
heckjayoung: excellent idea18:20
gyeeand it uses xml too? :)18:20
ayoungheh18:20
dwchadwickyea18:20
* heckj hangs his head18:20
ayoungdwchadwick, well, we can use it as the reference implementation,18:20
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:20
dwchadwickexactly. but back to attribute mapping18:20
ayoungsame kind of thing was an issue when talking about using Dogtag for certificates18:20
dwchadwickHenry, I did not follow your comment18:21
*** markwash has quit IRC18:21
henrynashayoung: I do like the idea of getting the attribute implementation in there, finding where we need to do the hooks, but disabled by defualt18:21
ayoungdwchadwick, you mean "what actually going to use the attributes to enforce permissions"18:21
henrynashdwchadwick: sorry :-) which one?18:21
*** afazekas has quit IRC18:21
dwchadwickhenry. Ok, now I follow. You are talking about the PDP18:22
ayoungdwchadwick, please expand your acronyms18:22
dwchadwickBut the attribute mapping design was specified so that it can work with the existing RBAC interface18:22
dwchadwickI see the use of ABAC by services as independent of attribute mapping18:22
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-meeting18:23
dwchadwickPDP - policy decision point. The policy engine that is fed an RBAC or ABAC policy and returns a grant/deny decison18:23
henrynashdwchadwick: yes18:24
dwchadwickPDP is the term used by Internet RFCs and most published papers on authorisation18:24
ayoungdwchadwick, yes, so Keystone doesn't own that.18:24
dwchadwickExactly. Thus attribute mapping is independent of how services make their authz decisions. It only effects how user attributes are converted into roles and tenants18:25
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting18:25
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
dwchadwickWhilst groups do not help with the longer term strategy, attribute mappings do, and can provide most of the functionality that groups need18:26
ayoungdwchadwick, so are you saying for V1, we make no changes to the current policy enforcement, and instead only focus on mapping an attribute to a role in a tenant?18:26
gyeebut adds more complexity?18:26
dwchadwickThe only thing missing is for the administrator to give the users some group memberships, and then for keystone middleware to pick these up and call the attribute mapping service18:26
*** flaper87 has quit IRC18:27
dwchadwickayoung - exactly18:27
*** jrd has quit IRC18:27
*** dkehn is now known as dkehn_afk18:27
dwchadwickPlus mapping is an optional feature that can switched on or off18:27
henrynashwhat I had in mind was a having a reference groups implementation that is wholly contained withng "current keystone mechanisms", with a prototype that would talk to the attribute mapping component18:27
ayoungdwchadwick, OK,  so I think we still need groups.  They are a n additional attribute for a user that will then map to multiple roles.18:27
henrynash(sorry I menat prototype interface)18:28
ayoungI don't think we have anything yet that can do that for us18:28
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
dwchadwickayoung. Yes you need something like groups to solve the use cases Henry specified in a non-federated world18:29
ayoungdwchadwick, but not in a federated world?18:29
kwssayoung yes, what is missing from our service is the capability for administrators to assign organisational attributes internally18:29
dwchadwickBut what I am suggesting is a simpler implementation of groups for Henry because the service that deals with assigning tenants and roles to groups is done by the attribute mapping service18:29
henrynashthat way we can flesh out how the attribute mapping side works, what the admin interfaces for it are etc. etc. and know we can switch over groups to use it when we have those production ready18:29
dwchadwickthen when we migrate to federated access, the same attribute mapping service is used and the group assignment feature is no longer carried out in Keystone, but in the organisation that acts as the IDP18:30
henrynashdchadwick: I'm less worried about typing that Henry has to do, but rather how we incrementally get to where we need to be and still ship production ready code at G and H18:31
ayounghenrynash, do you understand what dwchadwick is proposing?18:31
dwchadwickSo to summarise. Users need to be assigned to groups or organisational attributes. This is done either in Keystone (centralised authn) or in the IDPs (federated login)18:31
ayoungright18:31
henrynashayoung: only in part…18:32
dwchadwickthen these group attributes are mapped into keystone roles and tenants by the attribute mapping service18:32
gyeeso groups is a must, attribution is option, that right?18:32
gyeeattribute mapping I mean18:32
dwchadwickgyee - groups on their own are useless. This is because services dont understand them18:32
gyeethey are useful in assigning roles18:33
henrynashayoung: I understand the parts do far proposed, but seems to me that  there are still significant pieces to fill in18:33
dwchadwickgroups have to be mapped into tenants and roles. So we need the attribute mapping service for this (or something similar)18:33
ayoungOK, lets say we have a groups table18:33
ayoungthen we add an attribute_mapping table18:33
dwchadwickgyee - no groups are only useful in assigning roles if you have a service that can do this18:33
ayoungand a group assignment table18:34
Alex-Shulmanjust a small comment - groups are also useful for some access control models like ACLs - if someone will wish to plug this in at the storage level18:34
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
ayoungone a user is assigned to a group via an entry in the group assignment table, we add an entry in the attribute_mapping table that would give them the role?18:34
gyeedwchadwick, groups is only visible to Keystone18:34
dwchadwickyes tables will do this, but if you look at the entity relationship diagram in our blueprint you will see that a simple table is not good enough in general to do many to many mapping18:35
dwchadwickTo do many to many mapping you need several tables (as per our diagram)18:35
dwchadwickyou need a group table, an OS set table (which links together tenants and roles) and and a mapping table18:36
henrynashdwchadwick: agreed in general - but so far in keystone we have chased static assignments and hence the groups proposal is to extend that staid model….I agree a longer term goal of more flexibility is good18:36
henrynashhmm, some words didn't come out right in that sentence :-)18:37
dwchadwickhenry - but you still have to deal with tenants and roles dont you?18:37
henrynash(chosen status assignments……extend static model)18:38
henrynashdwchadwick: sure18:38
dwchadwickOur model has five new tables I think18:39
ayoungdwchadwick, OK, I think we need to go back and review to that design.  Let me see if I can get it up on line18:39
henrynashwe don't use the sets model of course in leystone today18:39
dwchadwickSo this is what we are talking about. Providing a set of APIs for setting, getting and deleting the table entries18:39
dwchadwickhttps://docs.google.com/a/kent.ac.uk/document/d/1cObK3P_ic9XSTwJRFsmimG94LDnFbsPbvx_H1aM1FPI/edit#18:40
*** jhenner has quit IRC18:41
dwchadwickShould we move to the next topic now and continue detailed discussions about attribute mapping via email, as time is running out18:41
ayoungWell, I think we covered everything but trusts18:42
ayoung#topic Trusts18:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Trusts (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:42
ayounghttp://wiki.openstack.org/Keystone/Trusts18:43
dwchadwickthis seems to be progressing nicely18:43
dwchadwickI think some more work is still needed for recursive delegation18:43
ayoungI feel pretty good about this spec.  There was one outstanding issue about whether we should allow administrative acces to the trusts.18:43
ayoungdwchadwick, agreed, but I think I want to punt on recursive for phase 118:44
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
*** vishy_zz is now known as vishy18:44
dwchadwickYou will need either backdoor or front door API access for administrators18:44
ayoungSince that is encapsulated inside of Keystone, we can phase it in18:44
ayoungdwchadwick, yeah, and I guess there is no harm there, either18:44
*** aclark_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
ayoungit will be either GET or DELETE18:44
dwchadwickYes, you can default delegation depth to zero in the first implementation. Also default validity time to infinity18:45
*** AlanClark has quit IRC18:45
ayoungI don't think I want to allow admins to create Trusts, and no one should be able to modify them18:45
heckjayoung: I like where it's going - want to get vishy input on it too, as it'll impact a number of pieces in core nova as well18:46
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
dwchadwickYou can also omit most other policy fields in the first implementation so that delegation is based primarily on the tenant and roles18:46
heckj(any notmyname and bcwaldon)18:46
notmyname?18:46
dwchadwickayoung agreed. Admin should only read and delete18:46
*** vishy has left #openstack-meeting18:46
ayoungheckj, yes, but i suspect that, like most things, they won't pay attention until it is implemented and they try to use it.18:47
* ayoung is slightly jaded from PKI18:47
dwchadwickI have to go in five mins. sorry18:47
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC18:47
heckjayoung: fair enough, I'm pushing them to look, read and think about it here18:47
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:47
ayoungheckj, as well we should.18:47
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** vishy has left #openstack-meeting18:48
ayoung#topic open discussion18:48
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:48
dwchadwickonce they start to use it, then they will be hooked and you will have plenty of demand for new features :-)18:48
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
ayoungCan you all chime in with who is working on what, if it has not come up in the meeting yet?18:48
dwchadwickWhat about adding IDPs to service catalog18:48
ayoungaah, right18:48
dwchadwickKristy has nearly finished this implementation now18:48
dwchadwickIt wont be needed until federation, but it would be nice to include the code to make sure it is bug free18:49
ayoungI don;t see anything contraversial there.18:49
kwssyes, i should have a rough implementation finished by the end of tomorrow.18:49
dwchadwickexcellent18:49
henrynash(separate topic): I think we need more clarity on what we mean when we talk about a "tenant" in v3 and beyond18:50
dwchadwickbut make sure it is smooth before it is sent for QA :-)18:50
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
ayoungkwss, great.  don't be daunted by the thoroughness of dolph's code reviews.18:50
dwchadwicktenant is an entity in the ISO standard for clouds18:50
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk18:50
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC18:51
dwchadwickIt is equivalent to account holder so I am led to believe18:51
ayounghenrynash, yes.  The thing is, we misused tenant in Keystone in the past18:51
henrynashayoung: agreed18:51
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
* heckj is tired of tilting at that windmill18:51
ayoungwhich is why we want to get everyone saying project for a while before we reintroduce the  term in its correct meaning18:51
* vishy has something to add to the meeting when there is a moment18:51
heckjwe (the project) blew that earlier I'm afraid, makes it difficult to reset to what is reasonable18:51
henrynashayoung: lol18:51
ayoungvishy, you have the conch18:52
dwchadwickseeing as vishy seems to have dissappeared, what about the release shedule for federation18:53
dwchadwickIf we can get attribute mapping and idp service in first, then it makes the rest that much less work18:53
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
ayoungdwchadwick, so it really is a question of having it ready for review18:54
ayoungIDPs will be G218:54
dwchadwickBTW, there is an OpenStack meeting in London tomorrow, where I am giving a talk about federated Keystone18:54
ayoungdwchadwick, where is attribute mapping?  Almost done?  Month or two away?18:54
heckjvishy: jump in whenever18:55
dwchadwickOk, so once Kristy has finished IDP service it will go for review, then next will be attribute mapping, and then finally the revised federation making use of the new service APIs.18:55
dwchadwickSorry but I must go now. Take care everyone18:55
ayoungdwchadwick, agreed.  So I would guess that G3 is likely, but like PKI, a tech preivew for Grizzly?18:55
kwssayoung, we hope to have an attribute mapping implementation ready by the end of the year18:56
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting18:56
ayoungkwss, I would warn you that things slow down in December, but I promise to keep on top of any code reviews18:56
kwssayoung, understood18:57
ayoungBut that should stil be a go for G218:57
*** dkehn_afk is now known as dkehn18:57
ayoungBut even if it isn't  It really matters how far between that and the full Federated impl18:57
vishyheckj: sorry, missed the notification18:58
ayoungand that is likely to be completed shortly before the end of the Grizzly cycle.  We'll have to decide based on how close and how hard it is to test whether it goes in, and if so, if we caveat it with "something new and shiny, please test."18:58
vishyheckj: so we were discussing having a way to map tenant_ids to tenant_names18:58
*** maurosr has quit IRC18:59
vishyis there an easy way to do it a) for one tenant and b) in bulk for a group of tenants?18:59
ayoungvishy, tenant ID generation defaults to uuid, but it doesn't need to be18:59
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
ayoungtenant ID just needs to be unique, so the two could potentially be the same18:59
*** dwchadwick has quit IRC19:00
ayounglet me peek at the create_tenant API,19:00
heckjvishy: today, no - but we could make an extension API to single or bulk lookup19:00
Alex-Shulmanalso tenants are created by name, but deleted by tenant_id - this is very inconvenient. Can this be changed?19:00
ayoungtenant_ref['id'] = tenant_ref.get('id', uuid.uuid4().hex)19:01
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
ayoungso you should be able to create a tenant with a specified ID that you pass it in19:01
ayoungTenantController.create_tenant19:01
Alex-Shulmancan we allow delete by tenant name as well (and implement the look up inside)?19:02
ayoungYou can't modify the id once it is created19:02
Alex-Shulmanworking with names is easier ...19:02
vishyi get push back about making them the same19:02
vishybecuase then project names can't change19:02
vishyi just need a way to map one to the other for user display19:03
ayoungAlex-Shulman, I think we can make that extension.  It is not changing previous behaviour.  It would also entail a CLI change19:03
vishyhorizon needs it too19:03
Alex-Shulmanthis will be great, thanks19:03
ayoungAlex-Shulman, file it as a ticket in track19:04
Alex-Shulmanok19:04
ayounger, launchpad19:04
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
heckjayoung: heh19:04
ayoungvishy, by mapping, do you mean just an API to enumerate all the tenants, names and ids?19:04
heckjvishy: I'll create a quick BP to make an extension or something for the lookup - will that work to get it started?19:04
heckjayoung: lit "give me a name for this UUID"19:05
heckjayoung: for projects and users I think19:05
* heckj bets cielometer would love that too19:05
* mordred would love it19:05
* mordred loves UUIDs19:05
ayoungheckj GET works for userid19:05
jeblairmordred: i think the whole infra team loves uuids.  ;)19:06
*** dtalton has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** jrd has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
kwssI have to leave. Take care :)19:07
* mordred hands jeblair a UUID, asks what its name is19:07
henrynashcheers, everyone19:07
*** kwss has left #openstack-meeting19:07
*** henrynash has quit IRC19:07
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
jeblairmordred: it's name is "#endmeeting"19:09
*** gyee has quit IRC19:10
*** maurosr has quit IRC19:10
*** Alex-Shulman has quit IRC19:10
clarkbayoung: care toe #endmeeting for us?19:10
ayoung#endmeeting19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"19:10
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 19:10:45 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:10
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2012/keystone.2012-12-04-18.00.html19:10
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2012/keystone.2012-12-04-18.00.txt19:10
clarkbty19:10
vishyheckj, ayoung: correct just a get name for uuid19:10
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2012/keystone.2012-12-04-18.00.log.html19:10
jeblair#startmeeting ci19:11
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 19:11:24 2012 UTC.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:11
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:11
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: ci)"19:11
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ci'19:11
*** marek_ has quit IRC19:11
jeblair#topic actions from last meeting19:11
*** openstack changes topic to "actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: ci)"19:12
jeblairfungi: any news on the foundation server front?19:12
funginothing new from toddmorey on his piece19:12
fungii started digging into the documentation updates and putting together a list, not in etherpad yet so nothing to link19:12
fungibug update script change proposed as requested: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/17488/19:13
jeblairmordred: you were working with todd on publishing the source for the site, right?19:13
mordredyes. and I have not heard an update from him on that19:13
fungii saw nothing in the bp update script which needed adjustment, but i could be misunderstanding what we wanted there19:13
jeblairmordred: would you like to pester him?19:14
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott19:14
jeblairfungi: yeah, i don't think the bp script needs updating for this19:14
fungigroovy19:14
clarkbI checked the bp script too and that was my understadning19:15
fungithanks clarkb!19:15
jeblair#action jeblair propose a system for linking revierifies to bugs19:15
jeblairthat still needs to happen19:15
jeblair#action mordred work with toddmorey on foundation server/code19:16
jeblair#topic testrepository19:16
*** openstack changes topic to "testrepository (Meeting topic: ci)"19:16
jeblairclarkb: how's that going?19:16
clarkbclarkb: slower than I would like, but it seems to be getting traction19:16
clarkber19:16
clarkbya ignore the fact that I addressed that to myself19:17
mordrednever19:17
clarkbI have parallel coverage working19:17
clarkband got four changes to nova merged that fixed broken tests19:17
clarkbthere are more broken tests that fail when run in parallel with testr. Current major issues are concurrent DB access and tests not sharing ip ports nicely19:18
jeblairclarkb: also, do we want to look into having jenkins randomize the order when it runs tests?19:19
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
clarkbI like the idea, but am beginning to think that getting all tests to pass if that is done will be a major headache19:19
jeblairclarkb: it sounded nice, except since it will create more failures, i think an ability to reproduce the exact sequence is necessary in order to fix those bugs19:20
mordred++19:20
jeblairanyway, we can certainly defer it for now19:20
clarkbyes, and it is possible to reproduce the sequence, but not necessarily the run time of each test19:20
clarkbmakes reproducing contention difficult19:20
* mordred is still really unclear as to how any of these are doing concurrent db access19:21
clarkbmordred: it is possible that something more devious is happening there19:21
clarkblike maybe the base DB file is being updated or something19:21
mordredclarkb: we do not use file-based sqlite19:22
mordredwhoever has been saying that we do is quite mistaken19:22
clarkbmordred: I htought the in memory DB is populated from a file though19:22
mordrednope19:22
clarkbok, I think that means there is a different DB related bug19:22
mordredthe in-memory db is first created by running through the migrations on an empty db19:22
mordredthen the results of that are saved into a sql script19:22
mordredwhich is then run on an empty db in the setup of each test case19:23
clarkbmordred: actually maybe that is the cause of the bug. since the test that is failing runs through the migrations and is finding that a column already exists19:23
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
clarkb(we may need to special case that test and have it tear down the DB in a way that it accepts)19:23
clarkblong story short, moving test fixtures to proper fixture objects has been fixing a lot of problems19:24
*** darraghb has quit IRC19:24
clarkbwe need to do the same for the DB (which mordred did) and anything that listens on sockets will need to be handled that way as well to avoid port conflicts19:24
jeblairclarkb: any special considerations for jenkins we should be thinking about?19:25
clarkbjeblair: eventually there will be some cleanup needed to remove the 0 tests check19:25
clarkbalso, we will need to copy different results files19:25
jeblairclarkb: doesn't testr store data between runs (test run times)?  where? and should we try to preserve that? or make sure it's not preserved?19:26
clarkbjeblair: it does store it in the .testrepository dir as a sequence of numbered files.19:26
clarkbsaving that data would be useful if we need to improve test run times even more19:26
clarkb(that log data is used by testr to partition tests)19:27
jeblairokay, so if we do nothing, it will be wiped out by git-clean, which has the advantage of determinism...19:27
clarkbcorrect19:27
jeblairthough it may be less fast.19:27
clarkbwe will also want to treat the subunit stream as a log we care about19:28
jeblairokay, we'll doing nothing and letting it get wiped out is probably the best first step.  we'd need some extra engineering to preserve that.19:28
jeblairok19:28
clarkb(that is the source of test sequencing and stdout/stderr/log)19:28
clarkbthere was a suggestion to run a non voting testr test against nova to help reviewers see the broken tests19:29
jeblairso it sounds like those things can all be merged after the testr change(s) land(s)19:29
mordredyah19:29
clarkbif we do that I think it might be most appropriate to install testr and dependencies on the systems and not in the venv19:29
clarkbjeblair: correct19:30
jeblairclarkb: do you think running a non-voting job would be helpful?19:30
clarkbbut the overall work should be minimal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15078/ runs under testr just fine when it can merge19:30
clarkbjeblair: I think its usefullness is really dependent on buy in from code reviewers19:31
clarkbif that info gets vishy et al into the mindset of fixing those errors then yes, it is worth it19:31
clarkbmordred: maybe you and I should drop into the next nova meeting and discuss this19:32
jeblairclarkb: why do you think testrepository should be installed on the system?19:32
clarkbjeblair: because I think there will be resistance adding it as a test-requires before tox/run_tests actually makes use of it19:32
clarkbthough now that you have me thinking about it we can just add a new tox env and run it out of there19:33
clarkb(with its own special deps list)19:33
jeblairyeah, i think that's the way to go -- better migration path19:33
clarkbyup. I retract my statement about system wide installs of testr19:34
jeblairclarkb: i am skeptical that having a non-voting job will focus attention.19:35
clarkbme too19:35
clarkbwill probably have better luck bringnig up particularly hairy failures to nova directly and ask for help that way19:36
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk19:36
jeblairclarkb: yeah; and your idea of raising the issue in the nova meeting seems like a good one.19:36
clarkbhowever, they want reproduceability, so adding a special tox venv may be useful even if we don't have a non voting test19:37
jeblairtrue19:37
jeblairclarkb: end of topic?19:38
clarkbI think so19:38
mordredclarkb also, the new env should help give them a way to try the new system out19:38
jeblair#topic grenade/quantum19:38
*** openstack changes topic to "grenade/quantum (Meeting topic: ci)"19:38
jeblairthese are languishing.  I pinged dtroyer about grenade and haven't heard back.19:38
jeblairprogress on quantum seems to be slow, but nachi is still working on it.19:38
jeblairi can probably merge my grenade-running change...19:39
jeblairset up a job that runs it...19:39
jeblairand then point dtroyer at that.19:39
clarkb++19:40
jeblair#topy pypi uploads19:40
jeblair#topic pypi uploads19:40
*** openstack changes topic to "pypi uploads (Meeting topic: ci)"19:41
jeblairclarkb: this is in place for all pypi-uploading projects now?19:41
fungitopy sounds like the name of our next pipy project19:41
clarkbjeblair: not yet19:41
clarkb#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/17417/19:41
clarkbthat change needs approval then it will be in place for all projects19:41
jeblairfungi, mordred: ^ ! :)19:41
*** maurosr has quit IRC19:41
clarkbthe new upload process is working for zuul, gerritlib, and JJB so I feel fairly confident putting it in place across the baord19:42
fungijust pulled up a tab for that one ;)19:42
jeblairclarkb: cool!  thanks for doing that!19:42
fungii'll review it as soon as the meeting wraps19:42
jeblair#topic git-review19:42
*** openstack changes topic to "git-review (Meeting topic: ci)"19:42
jeblairso we have released a tested and working version of git-review...19:43
jeblairthere are a bunch of changes for it in gerrit that aren't getting a lot of attention...19:43
mordredneed test suite19:43
jeblairmordred: do you want to hold off reviewing changes until there is a test suite?19:44
mordredjeblair: well, I'm really torn on that, honestly19:44
jeblairi've volunteered to do release-time manual testing...19:44
clarkbI think for some of the changes it depends.19:44
jeblairso we can at least make progress and release known-working things...19:44
*** stevebake_ has quit IRC19:44
mordredah - ok. that might be a short-term solution19:44
*** jchiles has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
clarkbI think refactoring type stuff should wait, but things like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16128/ which fix bugs might be valuable even with manual testing19:45
jeblairi think i can review some changes to git-review as well...19:45
fungithe slew of exit code changes are the ones languishing most, and i think those drive back to an overall design question19:45
jeblairyeah, i think the project could use a lead to make some decisions about the direction...19:46
*** heckj has quit IRC19:46
jeblairespecially since there might even be a few incompatible changes in the queue?19:46
mordredyah.19:47
mordredand I think that most of us think it's mostly fine as is right now19:47
*** j_chiles has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
*** aclark_ has quit IRC19:48
jeblairyeah, i'm personally not inclined to change it much, so i'm a bad choice to help git-review through the current situation...19:48
jeblairmy head is also full of other things.19:48
jeblairdoes anyone want to volunteer to help steer it?19:48
jeblairi suspect that if we do nothing, it'll end up getting forked.19:49
*** aclark_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
olaphi can volunteer to help whoever /is/ steering... :)19:49
*** stevebake_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
fungiolaph: we can team up on that i guess19:50
fungii'll try to dig through the existing open changes and wishlist bugs19:50
clarkbI know I have already reviewed some of the design changes and disagreed with them on gerrit. I can take that back up again, but I think I will try to maintain that stance19:50
clarkbwhich may not be helpful19:50
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
jeblairclarkb: that is helpful.  having any opinion is helpful i think.19:50
fungihaving not been around for its inception, i don't want to step on anyone's toes with regard to direction of the tool19:51
jeblairfungi: i only have one requirement: "git review" on a newly committed change to a newly cloned repo should "just work" with no interaction.  :)19:51
jeblairi don't really care what else it does.19:51
*** jchiles has quit IRC19:52
fungii agree with jeblair though on the having opinions part. overcomplicating its design to make it a more useful backend tool is going in the wrong direction in my opinion19:52
fungiso i think you were spot on with that, clarkb19:52
clarkbsounds like we have a driver ^ :)19:52
jeblairyep19:53
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away19:53
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul19:53
fungii'll see what headway i can make this week19:53
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
jeblair#action fungi steer git-review development19:53
clarkbawesome. I will gladly rereview things19:53
fungii'm still a little fuzzy on how to automate testing for it19:53
jeblairfungi: thanks, and me too.19:53
fungithe list jeblair put together is a great start19:53
fungibut we can take that discussion back to -infra19:54
*** aclark__ has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
clarkbfungi: I think that if you setup git repo fixtures and use GitPython you can come up with a reasonable test suite19:54
*** aclark_ has quit IRC19:54
jeblairfungi: i also don't think you have to write the test suite.  it's definitely not our highest priority.  i mostly just don't like the idea of changes sitting in gerrit but no project direction.19:55
fungijeblair: right. i saw that as to complimentary tasks19:55
jeblairk19:55
fungier, two19:55
jeblair#topic new-project howto19:56
*** openstack changes topic to "new-project howto (Meeting topic: ci)"19:56
jeblairclarkb: ^?19:56
clarkb#link http://ci.openstack.org/stackforge.html19:56
jeblairyay!19:56
*** lloydde has quit IRC19:57
clarkbI think that is mostly done. The generic this is how it works documentation has been in place since we added project management through puppet, but we were missing the how to do stackforge from scratch19:57
clarkbThe new stackforge doc should be fairly complete and comes with a blurb explaining the purpose of stackforge19:57
*** mestery has quit IRC19:57
*** j_chiles has quit IRC19:58
*** jog0 has quit IRC19:58
*** rnirmal has quit IRC19:58
jeblairclarkb: that's great!19:58
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** jog0 has left #openstack-meeting19:58
jeblairand that's time.  thanks!19:58
jeblair#endmeeting19:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"19:58
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 19:58:58 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ci/2012/ci.2012-12-04-19.11.html19:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ci/2012/ci.2012-12-04-19.11.txt19:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ci/2012/ci.2012-12-04-19.11.log.html19:59
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
*** mikal has quit IRC20:01
*** aclark__ has quit IRC20:01
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting20:02
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
mordredclarkb: do you want to send an email to the list telling people we have self-service projects in stackforge now and that there is a doc?20:03
*** aclark__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** jchiles has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away20:08
clarkbsure20:08
*** OS_Member500 has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
*** pvo has quit IRC20:10
*** dabo has quit IRC20:10
*** troytoman-away has quit IRC20:10
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott20:12
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
*** aclark__ has quit IRC20:13
*** rainya has quit IRC20:13
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** ameade_ has quit IRC20:20
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** dwchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting20:23
*** dwchadwick has quit IRC20:23
*** garyk has quit IRC20:24
*** jog0 has quit IRC20:26
*** mnewby has quit IRC20:27
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** dabo has quit IRC20:28
*** stevebake_ is now known as stevebake20:29
*** mnewby has quit IRC20:29
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** mnewby has quit IRC20:30
*** jchiles has quit IRC20:31
*** sarob has quit IRC20:33
*** jchiles has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** pvo has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** annegentle__ has quit IRC20:38
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul20:39
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
*** pvo has quit IRC20:41
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** stevebake has quit IRC20:43
*** stevebake_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
*** adjohn has quit IRC20:44
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
*** stevebake_ has quit IRC20:44
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
*** dabo has quit IRC20:47
*** dprince has quit IRC20:49
*** gabrielhurley has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** mestery has quit IRC20:49
*** rainya has quit IRC20:49
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
*** j_chiles has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
*** jchiles has quit IRC20:54
*** Vek has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away21:00
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
ttxmarkmc, heckj, notmyname, bcwaldon, jgriffith, vishy, gabrielhurley, danwent: around ?21:00
gabrielhurley\o21:00
vishyo/21:00
notmynamehere21:00
jgriffith\o21:01
* Vek yawns21:01
ttx(or anyone replacing heckj)21:01
markmcyep21:01
danwento/21:01
ttxmissing bcwaldon and heckj (or anyone from Keystone replacing him)21:01
ttxlet's get started and skip appropriately21:02
stevebakeo/21:02
ttx#startmeeting project21:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 21:02:09 2012 UTC.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'project'21:02
ttxAgenda @ http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:02
ttxRegular meeting today, we'll look into progress towards the next milestone/release21:02
*** dtalton has quit IRC21:02
ttx#topic General announcements21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "General announcements (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
ttx#info 2012.2.1 released last week, next point release planned for end of January21:02
markmcwe had one serious regression reported:21:02
ttxmarkmc: did you check why testing didn't catch that stable/folsom regression ?21:02
markmchttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/108394421:02
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1083944 in quantum/folsom "RPC exchange name defaults to 'openstack'" [Critical,In progress]21:03
markmcttx, I didn't, good point21:03
ttx#action markmc to check why testing didn't catch the various stable/folsom regressions21:03
ttxmarkmc: that's a regression specific to 2012.2.1 ?21:03
ttx(bug 1083944)21:03
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1083944 in quantum/folsom "RPC exchange name defaults to 'openstack'" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/108394421:03
markmcttx, yes, mostly a problem for nova - quantum also affected, but it's default config file masks the issue21:04
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul21:04
bcwaldonttx: I'm here!21:04
ttxmarkmc: would you treat that using release notes, or would you consider pushing another (interim) point release to address that ?21:04
markmcttx, I'd be tempted to do a "brown paper bag" release for Nova with just the fix21:04
*** Srinivas has quit IRC21:05
*** pvo has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
markmcttx, already added to the release notes21:05
markmcttx, it's the only fix since merged to nova stable/folsom21:05
ttxmarkmc: ok, maybe we can combine it with a few security updates21:05
markmcttx, ah, good idea21:05
markmcttx, I should block other nova fixes being merged until then though21:05
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
ttx#action ttx to look into the vulnerabilities trove for anything that could be in a 2012.2.221:05
ttxFor those doing grizzly-2, remember the cut date is January 821:06
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
ttxThe end of year vacation will hit us soon, so take that into account in your predictions :)21:06
*** littleidea_ has quit IRC21:06
ttxWe were talking about doing a bug day, and annegentle suggested a (separate) doc bug day.21:06
ttxannegentle_: want to tell us a bit more about that ?21:06
annegentle_sure. So the idea is that the doc team wants to be able to "bother" devs with questions on particularly tough doc bugs (and reviews)21:07
annegentle_so we didn't want to distract on bug day21:07
annegentle_Tom Fifieldt knocked a good handful of doc bugs over the weekend, but the backlog is still over 10021:08
ttxhmm, so we could do a bug day one Thursday, and the doc bug day on the next Thursday, would that work ?21:08
ttx(or the other way around)21:08
annegentle_ttx: sure21:08
ttxPTLs: anyone with a preference on the bugdays date ?21:09
ttxor should we just pick the damn dates and we'll make it happen ?21:09
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
danwentttx: just pick it21:10
bcwaldon+121:10
jgriffithpick-away21:10
ttxok, then I'd suggest bugday this week (Thursday) and docbugday next week21:10
gabrielhurleysounds good21:10
ttxthat leaves tha last week before vacation to push reviews for crazy stuff incoming21:11
jgriffithfine by me21:11
annegentle_ttx: actually shoot, the other way around would work better for me, I'm in an all day training next Thurs.21:11
annegentle_ttx: or Thurs. Fri. back to back this week?21:11
ttxhmm, I'd rather spearte them to make sure people can focus on them21:11
annegentle_ttx: sure makes sense21:11
jgriffithreverse is fine by me still21:12
ttxtwo days in a row is a bit too much of a focus21:12
ttx#info Doc Bug day December 6, Regular Bug day December 1321:12
ttxannegentle_: I'll let you announce / kick it off21:12
annegentle_hee we get the original day :)21:12
ttxmordred, annegentle, davidkranz: Anything to report from CI/QA/Docs land ?21:12
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
annegentle_#action annegentle_ to send note to mailing list re: bug days21:12
ttx(apart from the Docbugday ?)21:12
heckjsorry I'm late21:12
annegentle_Nothing new this week21:12
davidkranzDitto.21:13
ttxAnything else in general announcements before we switch to project-specific stuff ?21:13
*** pvo has quit IRC21:13
*** rainya has quit IRC21:13
ttx#topic Oslo status21:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Oslo status (Meeting topic: project)"21:13
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/grizzly-221:13
markmcrefresh btw21:14
markmcso21:14
markmcrelease-versioning, I think we have a plan21:14
ttxmarkmc: ok, looks on track now21:14
markmcmonty's going to summarize it21:14
ttxcool21:14
markmcI should be able to push forward with oslo-config package in the next week or two21:14
markmcit's the rootwrap guy who's slacking the most :-P21:14
* markmc ducks21:14
ttxnot /that/ guy again21:14
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
markmceric has kicked off the common-db work21:15
ttxif people stopped making reviews that show they don't get the security model around it :P21:15
markmcI'll poke russell about message versioning21:15
markmcso, feeling like we're on track21:15
ttxyes, sounds good21:15
ttxAnything else on the oslo topic ?21:15
Veksorry21:15
markmcaction from last week was to close out grizzly-121:15
markmcdid that21:15
markmcoh, also - we need CI integration for marking bugs as inprogress etc. when reviews are submitted21:16
markmcalso blueprints it seems21:16
markmchave some notes from eglynn on that, will poke this week21:16
ttxyes, I fixed that21:16
ttxreview in progress for the fix21:16
markmcreally?21:16
markmcexcellent!21:16
ttxbug 108586421:16
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1085864 in openstack-ci "update_bug doesn't update bug status for oslo" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/108586421:16
ttxok, ready to switch to keystone status µ?21:17
markmc#link https://review.openstack.org/310421:17
markmcoh, that's different21:17
markmcyep, carry on21:17
markmcthanks again for that ttx21:17
ttx#topic Keystone status21:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Keystone status (Meeting topic: project)"21:17
heckj(ttx: refresh keystone link please)21:17
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/grizzly-221:17
ttxheckj: Looks on track to me21:18
ttxheckj: Nothing from me, anythign you wanted to mention ?21:18
heckjactive discussion on token trusts (also known as delegation) - very relevant to all projects, so other PTL's asked to read, comment, and provide feedback on plans there21:19
heckj@link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/trusts21:19
heckj#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/trusts21:19
ttxheckj: I'll admit I didn't read all those threads... Are you converging towards a solution ? Or still discussing ?21:19
*** afazekas has quit IRC21:19
heckjttx: converging - lots of theoretically wrapped in there, but some very concrete pieces are coming out in trusts21:20
ttx#info other PTL's asked to read, comment, and provide feedback on token trusts plans21:20
ttxheckj: sounds great. Better discuss and do it right, rather than half-bake. Anything more about Keystone ?21:21
Vek\o21:21
ttxVek: go for it21:21
Vekdiscovered a bug in auth_token.py, but it only applies if someone wants to use memcache-based caching of tokens; guess no one's doing that.21:22
Veklp 108612521:22
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1086125 in python-keystoneclient "memcache_servers configuration option" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/108612521:22
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
Vekjust wanted to raise it here because python-keystoneclient appears to have the same lack of regular review that python-novaclient does :)21:22
bcwaldonVek: I'll review right now21:22
ttxVek: is that all you had ?21:23
notmynameFWIW, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+<project>,n,z gives all reviews for both the project and for the client project21:23
heckjVek: also work bringing up in keystone meetings if we're missing a review, please21:23
Vekyep.21:23
ttx#topic Swift status21:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift status (Meeting topic: project)"21:23
ttxnotmyname: o/21:23
notmynamehi21:23
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.7.621:23
*** reed has quit IRC21:23
ttxStill no date for this one ?21:23
notmyname swift 1.7.6 will be released after the first of the year21:24
notmynameprobably around mid january, but no date yet21:24
ttxnotmyname: thanks, good to know21:24
ttxI noticed that new untriaged bugs have started to pile up, would be good to triage them:21:24
notmynamethis should be a mostly-bugfix release21:24
ttxhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bugs?field.status=NEW&field.importance=UNDECIDED21:24
notmynamethe next release will probably be 1.8 and will (hopefully) include global cluster support21:25
notmyname(next == after 1.7.6)21:25
*** pvo has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
ttxinteresting21:25
ttxnotmyname: Anything else in the Swift department, before we switch to Glance ?21:25
notmynameI don't have anything else21:25
*** rainya has quit IRC21:25
ttx#info Swift 1.7.6 will be released after the first of the year, probably around mid-January21:26
ttx#info release after that will probably be 1.8 and will (hopefully) include global cluster support21:26
ttx#topic Glance status21:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance status (Meeting topic: project)"21:26
ttxbcwaldon: o/21:26
bcwaldonttx: hey21:26
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/grizzly-221:26
*** cbaesema has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
ttxLooks mostly on track so far21:27
bcwaldonindeed21:27
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
*** dabo has quit IRC21:27
*** juice_ has quit IRC21:27
bcwaldonI think we stalled a little bit over the past couple of weeks, but markwash and I had an encouraging discussion about the goals for g221:27
bcwaldoneverything appears on track21:27
ttxbcwaldon: yes, hopefully will see more work started by next week21:27
bcwaldonyou can bet on that21:28
bcwaldonbut don't21:28
ttxI only bet when I'm 100% sure to win. Anything more on Glance topic ?21:28
bcwaldonno, sir21:28
*** juice_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:28
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting21:28
*** littleidea_ has quit IRC21:28
ttx#topic Quantum status21:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Quantum status (Meeting topic: project)"21:28
ttxdanwent: hi!21:28
danwento/21:28
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/grizzly-221:29
ttxNice progress overall.. anything not started that you think makes sense to already defer to g3 ?21:29
danwenti've already bumped a few things out21:29
danwenti'm guessing some of the 'medium' priority stuff that is 'not started' won't make it, but all of the high stuff stands a good to very good chance21:29
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
ttxdanwent: sounds good. I found a small logic issue in your plan: lbaas-plugin-api-crud (High, g2) depends on lbaas-restapi-provider (Medium, no milestone)21:30
danwenthehe, was just looking at the lbaas-restapi-provider bp21:30
danwenti think that should be removed for now21:30
danwentthere is no dependency21:30
ttxthe relationship ? OK, will do21:30
danwentactually, i think the whole BP should be removed, but I need to check.  certainly the dependency can be removed.21:31
ttxl3-router-port-relationship was started, do you know which milestone we can expect it to land ?21:31
danwentah, that just slipped in.  should be G-2.21:31
danwenthow did you notice that one so I can find them in the future?21:31
danwentdoes ttx.py find it?21:31
ttxSaw it on http://wiki.openstack.org/releasestatus/21:32
danwentok, will try and check that out in the future21:32
* ttx sets g221:32
*** mikal has quit IRC21:32
ttxdanwent: so you can remove the series goal from https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/lbaas-restapi-provider if it doesn't make sense21:33
ttxThat's all I had. Anything else on Quantum, anyone ?21:33
danwentwill do21:33
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting21:33
ttx#topic Cinder status21:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Cinder status (Meeting topic: project)"21:33
jgriffith:)21:33
ttxjgriffith: hi!21:33
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/grizzly-221:33
jgriffithhey there21:33
ttxYou look on track so far!21:34
jgriffithYep!21:34
* jgriffith is optimistic still21:34
*** pvo has quit IRC21:34
ttxAbout local-storage-volume (the island project): what's the status of that ? still not started ?21:34
jgriffithI'm only worried about the FC nad local-storage21:34
jgriffithhaha21:34
ttxI read your mind21:34
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
jgriffithI'm hoping to get input in tomorrows meeting21:34
jgriffithwill address bp's from there if needed21:34
jgriffithfolks have been MIA as of late21:35
ttxjgriffith: frankly I don't see why that's "essential", pretty sure cinder grizzly could survive without it21:35
ttxnice to have certainly. Essential ?21:35
jgriffithttx: true21:35
jgriffithttx: but if multiple people ask me for something I try to be a bit dramatic :)21:35
jgriffithttx: I'll adjust21:35
ttxYou can downgrade to High to prepare for the future :)21:35
*** troytoman-away has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
jgriffithttx: yep, good idea21:36
ttxwell, saying it's essential is also about committing that it will land21:36
ttxso it's a two edged sword21:36
jgriffithttx: Yeah, understood21:36
ttxOtherwise, same remark as for Swift, untriaged bugs have started to pile up and could use some attention @21:36
ttxhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.status=NEW&field.importance=UNDECIDED21:36
jgriffithttx: Planned to take it myself if needed but that's happening in other areas21:36
ttxAnything more in Cinder ?21:36
jgriffithNot from me21:37
ttx#topic Nova status21:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova status (Meeting topic: project)"21:37
ttxvishy: o/21:37
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/grizzly-221:37
vishyhi21:37
ttxNice progress so far.21:37
*** dabo has quit IRC21:37
ttxA small inconsistency on your plans: db-cleanup (High) depends on db-unique-keys (Medium)21:38
ttxShould I bump db-unique-keys to High, or downgrade db-cleanup to Medium ?21:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** pvo has joined #openstack-meeting21:39
ttxvishy ^21:39
markmcjust spotted that better-libvirt-network-volume-support review has been abandoned21:39
vishymedium21:39
ttxvishy: a lot of your assignees still need to add milestone targets to their blueprints.21:39
ttxIf you don't have time to chase them down, want me to send them an email myself ?21:40
vishyttx: sure21:40
ttxIn particular a lot of non-targeted blueprints are obviously started:21:40
ttxdb-session-cleanup, coverage-extension, show-availability-zone, vmware-compute-driver, zk-service-heartbeat, trusted-filter-cache, grizzly-hyper-v-nova-compute, powervm-compute-enhancements...21:40
vishymarkmc: not surprising, someone will probably have to take it21:40
*** jcooley is now known as jcooley|away21:40
ttx#action ttx to help trying to get milestone targets out of Nova assignees21:40
ttxvishy: that's all I had. Anything you wanted to add ?21:41
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting21:41
vishyttx: nope21:41
*** maurosr has quit IRC21:42
ttx#topic Horizon status21:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Horizon status (Meeting topic: project)"21:42
gabrielhurleyhi21:42
ttxgabrielhurley: yo21:42
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/grizzly-221:42
ttxLooks like slow progress to me, still think you're on track ?21:42
gabrielhurleyslow start on the BPs... I've been sick, etc. I think we'll be alright, though.21:43
ttxgabrielhurley: hope you're doing better now :)21:43
gabrielhurleyit's a similar scope to the G1 timeframe, so I think it's reasonable21:43
ttxHow much work does resource-introspection represent ?21:43
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away21:43
gabrielhurleya couple days of my time. If that one slips to G3 it'll be okay though21:43
gabrielhurleyI downgraded it from essential to high21:43
*** pvo has quit IRC21:43
*** troytoman-away has quit IRC21:43
ttxcool. Anything else you wanted to mention ?21:44
gabrielhurleyfirst horizon team meeting is in about 15 minutes in this IRC channel21:44
gabrielhurleythat's all21:44
heckjwoot!21:44
ttxwhich means I only have 15min with the baby projects21:44
gabrielhurleyincentive to keep on schedule ;-)21:44
stevebakehttps://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/grizzly-221:44
ttx#topic Incubated projects21:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects (Meeting topic: project)"21:44
ttxstevebake: How complete is that ?21:45
stevebakewell, there is feature work which should probably have blueprints, but we're getting better21:45
ttxstevebake: So your repo is moved now. Next steps are:21:45
ttx* Ask CI to set up the tarball-building Jenkins jobs21:45
ttx* Finalize your grizzly blueprints plan21:45
stevebakewe'll probably start to wind down dev soon and work on more bugs and docs21:46
ttxOn that last point... I have a few generic advice that is also valid for Ceilometer21:46
stevebakeshoot21:46
ttx* Only use "Unknown" as implementation status if you have no idea what the status is. Most times what you actually want is "Not started" instead21:46
*** dabo has quit IRC21:46
ttx* Get everything prioritized21:46
ttx* Try to have assignees and milestones for all the High priority stuff21:46
ttx* Make sure all milestone-targeted blueprints have series goal = grizzly set21:46
stevebakeyeah, ReST API is actually almost complete21:46
ttx(LP doesn't enforce that and it makes the series/milestone views confusing)21:46
ttx* You can use https://github.com/ttx/bp-issues to run ttx.py which emulates a number of sanity checks I make with blueprints21:46
stevebakeok21:46
jd__(Ceilometer is listening)21:46
ttxIn case you haven't read it yet, your bible lives at http://wiki.openstack.org/PTLguide21:47
stevebakespeaking of PTL...21:47
stevebakeOurs would be Steve Dake, who has been ill since before summit and will hopefully be back mid-jan21:47
ttxok21:48
stevebakewe're quite happy to carry on without one until then, unless we need to semi-officially appoint an interim21:48
*** guitarzan has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
ttxstevebake: that's fine (carrying on without one until then)21:49
ttxAlso note that if you add "openstack-release" to the heat-drivers team I can help you fix minor things in your Launchpad pages21:49
ttxLike dates on your milestones etc.21:49
ttxjd__: representing Ceilometer ?21:49
stevebakeok.21:49
jd__ttx: yes, nijaba's away21:49
ttxLooking at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/grizzly21:49
ttxStarts looking good... hints from above also apply to you21:49
jd__yes, I'll transmit those to nijaba :)21:50
ttxI was looking at https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/grizzly-2 ...21:50
ttxIs that a complete plan ? Or you still working on it ?21:50
*** lifeless has quit IRC21:50
*** rainya has quit IRC21:50
jd__that's the complete plan21:50
jd__we reviewed it with nijaba today21:50
ttxok, then you look pretty much on track21:50
jd__trying :-)21:51
ttxon another note, the thread on the nova/ceilometer integration died without a clear way forward afaict...21:51
ttxlooks like we depressed you to death21:51
jd__no, we've a review about this I think21:51
ttxjd__: pointer ?21:51
jd__https://review.openstack.org/#/c/17463/21:51
jd__didn't checked it yet, I might be wrong though21:51
markmc#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/nova-independent-virt21:52
markmclooks like it alright21:52
ttxok, will look into it. Was wondering about that21:53
jd__cool21:53
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting21:53
ttxOK, that's all the advice I had in my bag for today... maybe you have questions ?21:53
ttxfor the first time in a long time we actually have extra time :)21:53
jd__I'm good :)21:53
ttxstevebake: any question ?21:54
stevebakeall good here21:54
ttxwell, back to work then :)21:55
jd__:-)21:55
ttx(or back to sleep)21:55
ttx#endmeeting21:55
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"21:55
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 21:55:19 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2012/project.2012-12-04-21.02.html21:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2012/project.2012-12-04-21.02.txt21:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2012/project.2012-12-04-21.02.log.html21:55
ttxthanks everyone !21:55
*** troytoman-away has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
*** Vek has left #openstack-meeting21:55
*** ddemir has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
hub_caphey reddwarfers, we are moving to #openstack-meeting-alt to free this time up to core projects21:56
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC21:56
gabrielhurleyooookay, let's see if I can work meetbot...21:59
gabrielhurley#startmeeting horizon21:59
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  4 21:59:43 2012 UTC.  The chair is gabrielhurley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)"21:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'21:59
gabrielhurleyhuzzah21:59
gabrielhurleyNo formal agenda today as it's the first meeting. I'll try and start publishing one regularly in th future.22:00
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net22:00
ttrifonovAloha22:00
gabrielhurleycan I get a quick show of hands from folks who are here for this meeting, just so I know who I might be talking to?22:00
gabrielhurleyhi ttrifonov, been a bit, glad you're here!22:00
ttrifonov\m/22:00
* mrunge is here22:00
ttrifonovI've been off for a while, hope to be around for grizzly-222:01
*** jrd has quit IRC22:01
gabrielhurleyCool. Well let's tentatively run the meeting this way: 1) general status, 2) blueprint/critical bug review, 3) open discussion/QA time.22:01
gabrielhurley#topic General Horizon Status22:02
*** openstack changes topic to "General Horizon Status (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:02
*** kaganos has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
gabrielhurleyG1 wrapped up nicely, with only two possible bugs reported in the last couple days that I would deem "serious".22:03
gabrielhurleyG2 is off to a bit of a slow start (partly my fault for being sick and busy), but I expect it to pick up and I'm sure these meetings will help.22:03
mrungedo you have a reference to those serious bugs?22:03
gabrielhurleyI'll bring 'em up in the next section ;-)22:03
*** markmc has quit IRC22:03
*** adam_g has quit IRC22:03
*** adam_g has joined #openstack-meeting22:03
mrungegreat22:03
gabrielhurleyI want to acknowledge that the pace of Gerrit reviews has also slowed. I need to be more vigilant, and I also intend to harass people with core review powers to do their jobs more often22:04
gabrielhurleyin a nice way, of course :-D22:04
ttrifonovthe dopenstack way22:05
mrungehow many core reviewers are out there currently?22:05
gabrielhurleyof course22:05
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
gabrielhurleythere are ~5 that should be active including myself22:05
mrungein the last, I have only seen two or three22:05
gabrielhurleyhence the problem22:05
gabrielhurleyheh22:05
gabrielhurleyI've also started leaning towards taking multiple +1's from non-core reviewers whom I know/trust in place of additional +2's from core.22:05
mrunge;-)22:05
gabrielhurleyespecially on smaller patches22:05
gabrielhurleyblueprints definitely need core reviewers22:06
gabrielhurleyanyhow, just a little added encouragement to keep people who may not be "core" active22:06
gabrielhurleyI think we can move to the next topic22:06
gabrielhurley#topic Blueprints and Bugs22:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints and Bugs (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:06
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
gabrielhurleyas I mentioned, there are two bugs that came out of G1 that I want to look at ASAP22:06
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
gabrielhurleyhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/108629022:07
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1086290 in horizon "Edit flavor with extra specs fails" [High,Confirmed]22:07
gabrielhurleyThat one I thought we had tests for and had specifically addressed in the original patch, but there are reports of it not working, so it needs to be confirmed/fixed22:07
* gabrielhurley needs a second to find the other one...22:08
gabrielhurleyhere we go: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/108413722:08
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1084137 in horizon "login not possible if not service "volume" defined on keystone" [Undecided,Incomplete]22:08
gabrielhurleyI haven't confirmed that yet since I just triaged it this morning22:09
gabrielhurleybut given the reworkig we did of the quota/usage tabulation in G1 I want to make sure we didn't introduce a regression.22:09
gabrielhurleyI hesitate to confirm it outright because the same reporter filed another bug that was the result of a misconfigured keystone catalog22:09
gabrielhurleyso someone needs to try building out a devstack without cinder/n-vol and see if Horizon works22:09
mrungehasn't been there a patch to avoid that? one week ago?22:10
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
gabrielhurleypossibly22:10
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
gabrielhurleyneeds confirmation22:10
gabrielhurleythat's why the bug is marked incomplete22:10
gabrielhurleyI just want to be sure we don't have a regression22:10
gabrielhurleyany takers for investigating?22:10
mrungeI'll have a look on that22:11
mrunge(the second one)22:11
gabrielhurleyawesome, thank you22:11
gabrielhurleyI'm not aware of any other new bugs that rank above a "medium" priority, and the bugs on the list are all pretty standard, so let's talk BPs for a minutes22:11
gabrielhurley*minute22:11
ttrifonovI'll volunteer for the Swift bug,22:12
gabrielhurleyexcellent22:12
ttrifonovin fact it should be fixed with the patch in swift-pythonclient22:12
gabrielhurleyeven better22:12
ttrifonovbut there is some oboslete code that needs to be removed in api/nova22:12
ttrifonov*obsolete22:12
gabrielhurleygotcha22:12
gabrielhurleyhopefully not too hard to clean up22:13
ttrifonovI just have to check if everything works now,22:13
ttrifonovno, few lines with TODO22:13
gabrielhurleycool22:13
gabrielhurleyanyhow, on the blueprints22:13
gabrielhurleyso, davidlenwell and his team are gona tackle most of the file upload work in G2/G3, and unless he wants to chime in now I'm gonna assume that's on track for the time being.22:13
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
davidlenwellit is22:13
gabrielhurleyawesome22:13
davidlenwellany day now actually if I can stop getting distracted by bare metal nova and other stuff hp is doing22:14
gabrielhurleyheh. no worries. You've stil lgot over a month22:14
davidlenwellYeah .. We'll hit it for sure22:14
gabrielhurleyand then G3 for implementing it everywhere22:14
ttrifonovone question - https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1065601 - as I've mentioned there - this looks like a blueprint, lot of work there22:14
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1065601 in horizon "no default templates for security rules" [Medium,Confirmed]22:14
*** rainya has quit IRC22:14
gabrielhurleyttrifonov: agreed. that will be addressed in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/security-group-rules22:15
gabrielhurleyand I've got good ideas there which I think will work really nicely22:15
ttrifonovah, nice22:15
gabrielhurleyIt's on my "I really want to do this but it's not actually a high priority" list22:15
*** j_chiles has quit IRC22:15
gabrielhurleyother BPs I have thoughts/questions on...22:16
gabrielhurleyhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/orderable-mutiple-choice-field22:16
gabrielhurleyI'm hoping we can just find an off-the-shelf Django form field we can pull in there22:16
gabrielhurleysomeone's got to have built one before22:16
gabrielhurleythe Quantum team needs it for ordering vnics22:16
gabrielhurleyI was hoping one of them might pick that up, but I haven't heard anything from them about it22:16
gabrielhurleyI can follow up with them on it, but I'll be the fallback for getting it done when they actually need it.22:17
gabrielhurleysame with https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/nova-net-quantum-abstraction22:17
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC22:17
gabrielhurleyit's another one where the quantum team needs it22:17
gabrielhurleyI think I'll ask akihiro or dan to attend this meeting next week to talk about their plans22:17
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:17
gabrielhurley#action gabrielhurley to follow up with quantum team about having a representative at horizon meeting22:18
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:18
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
gabrielhurleyI don't feel compelled to go into the other blueprints right now and would rather have plenty of time to let anyone else discuss topics of interest22:18
gabrielhurley#topic General discussion22:18
*** openstack changes topic to "General discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:18
gabrielhurleyI'm here to answer questions, offer advice, etc. so fire away22:19
davidlenwellgabrielhurley: have you done anymore work building the spec for push notifications ?22:19
gabrielhurleyI knew somebody was gonna call me on that22:19
davidlenwellha ha22:19
gabrielhurleyno, I've been swamped since the summit22:19
gabrielhurleyI have the etherpads all bookmarked in my browser to follow up22:19
davidlenwellthe reason I call it out is that I was just considering doing some work on pythons web sockets22:20
gabrielhurleygotcha22:20
davidlenwellTo negate the nead for node22:20
gabrielhurleyyeah22:20
gabrielhurleyIf you beat me to the punch you're welcome to it22:20
gabrielhurleyfirst mover gets to define things by-and-large22:20
davidlenwellWe'll see .. I have a lot on my plate too .. but this is a pet project of mine22:20
gabrielhurleyyeah, for sure22:21
davidlenwell(web sockets / python )22:21
gabrielhurleyI've been doing a lot of websocket work lately, so I definitely have opinions, but I don't think our protocol needs to be fancy at all22:21
gabrielhurleyin fact the simpler the better22:21
davidlenwell++22:21
davidlenwellI'm a minimalist so yeah ..22:22
*** ddemir has left #openstack-meeting22:22
gabrielhurleythe biggest problem I've run into with socket communication involving openstack is actually the tremendous inconsistency in responses22:22
gabrielhurleyso we need https://etherpad.openstack.org/grizzly-signaling before we can do much for Horizon22:22
*** heckj has quit IRC22:22
*** guitarzan has left #openstack-meeting22:23
gabrielhurleyI need to follow up on that one too, but the Ceilometer team was very excited on working on that as well22:23
davidlenwellIt might be out of range for grizzly22:23
gabrielhurleyyeah, probably22:23
gabrielhurleybut worth getting started22:23
davidlenwellagreed22:23
mrunge+122:23
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
davidlenwellgabrielhurley do you kno cody-somerville ?22:24
gabrielhurley#action gabrielhurley to follow up with ceilometer team on moving the message "subscription" code into common22:24
gabrielhurleydavidlenwell: I do not22:24
cody-somervilleHi. :)22:24
davidlenwellCody .. Meat gabrielhurley22:24
gabrielhurleyhey22:24
davidlenwellha ha .. spelled that wrong22:24
davidlenwellhe's a new hp hire22:24
gabrielhurleyexcellent. welcome to OpenStack22:24
davidlenwelland has some django skills .. So he'll be helping out22:25
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
gabrielhurleyfantastic. feel free to start picking off bugs to get familiar, or if you've already got assignments we can coordinate on prioritizing them into Horizon's roadmap appropraitely22:25
*** patelna has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
cody-somervilleSounds good.22:25
mrungeare there any plans for ceilometer integration in horizon?22:26
gabrielhurleyhmmm22:26
gabrielhurleynot targeted for Grizzly right now 'cuz no one is chmpioning it22:26
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC22:26
gabrielhurley*championing22:26
gabrielhurleyhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer22:27
gabrielhurleyneeds somebody to envision what it would look like and then build it out22:27
mrungeah, I see22:27
mrungethanks22:27
ttrifonovhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1049161  - what's the status of this? The patch in pythonclient fixes the bug,   but I'm not sure if this needs some backport or else ..22:27
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1049161 in horizon "Cannot start instance when using non-ASCII chars in user data" [Low,Confirmed]22:27
gabrielhurleyI haven't spent enough time with ceilometer to even know exactly how I'd want to present that data22:27
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC22:27
gabrielhurleyttrifonov: if it can be confirmed working then feel free to close the ticket as fixed22:28
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
gabrielhurleyAlright, well I'm in favor of keeping these meetings short. Let's try and grow the attendance for next week, and keep knocking out those bugs and blueprints!22:29
gabrielhurleyThanks everyone!22:29
davidlenwell++22:30
mrungethank you Gabriel!22:30
gabrielhurley#endmeeting22:30
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"22:30
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  4 22:30:13 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:30
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2012/horizon.2012-12-04-21.59.html22:30
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2012/horizon.2012-12-04-21.59.txt22:30
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2012/horizon.2012-12-04-21.59.log.html22:30
*** jchiles has joined #openstack-meeting22:32
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting22:33
*** gabrielhurley has left #openstack-meeting22:35
*** dwcramer has quit IRC22:38
*** mrunge has quit IRC22:40
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:41
*** jcooley|away is now known as jcooley22:41
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** mtreinish has quit IRC22:45
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:02
*** jcru has quit IRC23:04
*** dkehn has left #openstack-meeting23:04
*** jchiles has quit IRC23:06
*** vipul has left #openstack-meeting23:16
*** lifeless has quit IRC23:17
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:17
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting23:17
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting23:19
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting23:21
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away23:27
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net23:27
*** markwash has quit IRC23:36
*** henrynash has quit IRC23:38
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk23:39
*** patelna has quit IRC23:41
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott23:46
*** sarob has quit IRC23:50
*** mattray has quit IRC23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!