| *** geguileo is now known as Guest1282 | 08:56 | |
| *** chuanm7 is now known as chuanm | 12:33 | |
| whoami-rajat | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Feb 28 14:00:18 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| whoami-rajat | today's meeting is in video+IRC format https://meet.google.com/xqc-ekpa-dao | 14:01 |
| jayaanand | hi | 14:01 |
| crohmann | o/ | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:02 |
| akawai | o/ | 14:02 |
| kgube | o/ | 14:03 |
| whoami-rajat | hello everyone | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-caracal-meetings | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic announcements | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | first, Jon Bernard stepped up to be the 2024.2 PTL! | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/Q54EYAWNYVVOBZKIVFWDMKDONOMJAH4V/ | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/910024 | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | next, os-brick 6.7.0 for 2024.1 (caracal) released | 14:06 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909400 | 14:07 |
| whoami-rajat | Upcoming Deadlines & Dates | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | Caracal-3 milestone (feature freeze): February 29th, 2024 (R-5 week) | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | Cycle Highlights Due: March 7th, 2024 (R-4 week) | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | RC1 deadline: March 14, 2024 (R-3 week) | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | Final RC deadline: March 28, 2024 (R-1 week) | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | 2024.1 Caracal final release: April 3rd, 2024 | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | Dalmatian PTG: April 8-12, 2024 | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/KWT45CP6MPRCYUKLLZ3KOSYJCYI7FN4Z/ | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic Review request guidelines not being honoured | 14:14 |
| crohmann | I responded to that one as I feel my list of review requests caused this reminder. | 14:16 |
| whoami-rajat | no, i was just mentioning this in the video meeting that it was a general observation, multiple driver vendors had added multiple patches and irrespective of the deadline | 14:17 |
| whoami-rajat | i was just looking at past couple of week's request section and made the observation, also it's just a reminder for efficient review request | 14:17 |
| whoami-rajat | which would benefit the author as well as reviewer | 14:17 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic Feature Freeze and cinderclient release | 14:18 |
| crohmann | sorry, for not being int he video call today. I wrote a few lines about my motivation. I believe an efficient review process should be a future topic. | 14:18 |
| crohmann | Is there a goal to deprecate the cinderclient in favor of OpenStack client / SDK? | 14:21 |
| akawai | HPE XP HA patch supports active-standby only, not support active-active. | 14:25 |
| whoami-rajat | crohmann, we don't have a plan of doing that, we still have support missing in SDK | 14:32 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic open discussion | 14:32 |
| crohmann | Is anybody interested to help me with the Ceph caps https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2051244 ? | 14:33 |
| crohmann | whoami-rajat: I suppose the linked google doc with the regard osc parity is still current? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yetPti2XImRnOXvvJH48yQogdKDzRWDl-NYbjTF67Gg/edit#gid=1463660729 | 14:36 |
| whoami-rajat | i think eharney mentioned he will take a look, maybe you can contact him directly | 14:36 |
| crohmann | Will do. THX eharney. | 14:36 |
| whoami-rajat | crohmann, i haven't updated it in quite a while, i will provide another docs link | 14:37 |
| whoami-rajat | crohmann, this contains the work items https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XUFsOnVBxo6sCvF9tSwPFfwMd0COEbeUF7yndRL92i4/edit | 14:39 |
| crohmann | awesome, thx whoami-rajat. Does it make sense to convert this doc to a set of bugs? This makes it more approachble for part-time contributor to pick one or two missing features. Or do you rather want to tackle this in a bug push somehow? | 14:41 |
| whoami-rajat | crohmann, osc and sdk bugs are tracked on storyboard | 14:42 |
| whoami-rajat | i think we can create a story and add tasks to it | 14:42 |
| whoami-rajat | each task associated to a particular command | 14:42 |
| crohmann | I know. But are all those missing "features" tracked there? | 14:42 |
| whoami-rajat | not yet | 14:42 |
| whoami-rajat | it was planned to be done by some outreachy intern but we haven't been getting any lately | 14:43 |
| whoami-rajat | but +1 to move them to storyboard as tasks | 14:43 |
| crohmann | I mean it look (!) like 200 clicks to add a task for each line ... but it might make more sense to cluster them with some insight knowledge, right? | 14:44 |
| whoami-rajat | sorry, i don't understand | 14:45 |
| whoami-rajat | s/don't/didn't | 14:46 |
| crohmann | Looking at the Google doc it appears this is an easy ask (I'd take it), but clustering a few commands into a task (knowning the inner workings of cinder) might make sense | 14:47 |
| whoami-rajat | they're already clustered, aren't they? I've grouped them based on the APIs, like attachments, snapshot, volumes etc. | 14:48 |
| whoami-rajat | I'm happy to help but I've stopped working on it since this cycle due to other priorities | 14:48 |
| whoami-rajat | so I'm okay if anyone else would like to drive this effort | 14:48 |
| crohmann | I was just worried that the target of replacing cinderclient is moving (away) with more changes going into cinderclient. Once parity is achieved there will only be one codebase to maintain for clients. | 14:50 |
| crohmann | If you like I gladly convert the document to a story on the storyboard. | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | that was the original intent, we've asked contributors to propose patches for cinderclient as well as OSC/SDK | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | also new CLI options are not accepted in cinderclient | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | there was one patch recently merged though | 14:51 |
| crohmann | Yeah, that kinda triggered me ;-) | 14:52 |
| whoami-rajat | kgube, do you have a SDK alternative for the cinderclient change? | 14:52 |
| whoami-rajat | i think nova is also interested in calling SDK rather than cinderclient for API calls | 14:52 |
| kgube | whoami-rajat, I actually did write one sometime last year, but I never pushed it | 14:53 |
| whoami-rajat | kgube, oh okay, would be great if you added that and i can review since cinder cores have +2 rights in osc and sdk | 14:54 |
| kgube | I can try to rebase it and make a change for it | 14:54 |
| whoami-rajat | great thanks | 14:54 |
| whoami-rajat | and thanks crohmann for mentioning it | 14:54 |
| whoami-rajat | we've 4 minutes left, anything else for open discussion? | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | i think that's all for today | 14:57 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks for joining | 14:57 |
| whoami-rajat | #endmeeting | 14:57 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Feb 28 14:57:44 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-02-28-14.00.html | 14:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-02-28-14.00.txt | 14:57 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-02-28-14.00.log.html | 14:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!