Thursday, 2016-09-22

*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:09
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:09
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:10
*** neilus has quit IRC00:14
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC00:16
*** kaisers1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** kaisers2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck00:24
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:25
*** kaisers3 has quit IRC00:25
*** cdelatte has quit IRC00:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:32
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** hieulq_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:33
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:38
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** banix has quit IRC00:41
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:45
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:45
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:48
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:49
*** iyamahat has quit IRC00:52
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** spzala has quit IRC00:53
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:54
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:56
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:57
*** spzala has quit IRC00:58
*** hieulq_ has quit IRC00:59
*** ijw has quit IRC01:00
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:01
*** Swami__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:01
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:04
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** Swami_ has quit IRC01:05
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC01:05
*** kevo has quit IRC01:06
*** sdake has quit IRC01:06
*** bana_k has quit IRC01:06
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:11
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:15
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC01:15
*** yamahata has quit IRC01:15
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC01:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:16
*** mickeys has quit IRC01:17
*** rossella_s has quit IRC01:19
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:19
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:19
*** gouthamr has quit IRC01:20
*** Swami__ has quit IRC01:20
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC01:21
*** knangia has quit IRC01:21
*** baoli has quit IRC01:21
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:23
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC01:23
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC01:24
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK01:28
*** iyamahat has quit IRC01:30
*** vinaypotluri has quit IRC01:32
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:34
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:36
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC01:37
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:44
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:45
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:47
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC01:47
*** ijw has quit IRC01:48
*** woodster_ has quit IRC01:50
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:52
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:57
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:57
*** beslemon has quit IRC01:59
*** neilus has quit IRC02:01
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC02:05
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC02:07
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:08
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:12
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:14
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC02:16
*** gongysh has quit IRC02:16
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** spzala has quit IRC02:18
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** banix has quit IRC02:21
*** ddieterly has quit IRC02:22
*** ijw has quit IRC02:25
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:42
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:48
*** hongbin has quit IRC02:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:51
*** ddieterly has quit IRC02:53
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC02:55
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:02
*** david-lyle has quit IRC03:03
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:08
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:08
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:12
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC03:13
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:13
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC03:17
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:21
*** baoli has quit IRC03:21
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:28
*** cartik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:28
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:43
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:45
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:46
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:47
*** neilus has quit IRC03:50
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:51
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:53
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:59
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:02
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:02
*** armax has quit IRC04:05
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:09
*** beslemon has quit IRC04:12
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC04:14
*** kberger has quit IRC04:15
*** kberger has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:16
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC04:18
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:18
*** michchap has quit IRC04:20
*** mickeys has quit IRC04:21
*** Leo_ has quit IRC04:22
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:25
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC04:25
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** ijw has quit IRC04:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:35
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:37
*** kberger has quit IRC04:45
*** kberger has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:47
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:49
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC04:49
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:51
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:01
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm05:03
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax05:03
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC05:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:08
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:13
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:14
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:18
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:19
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:21
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck05:22
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:22
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:23
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:26
*** mickeys has quit IRC05:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:29
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:30
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:33
*** cartik has quit IRC05:34
*** neilus has quit IRC05:38
*** janki has quit IRC05:39
*** sxc731 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:43
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:45
*** bana_k has quit IRC05:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:48
*** sxc731 has quit IRC05:48
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:51
*** florianf has quit IRC05:51
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:53
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:54
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC05:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:55
*** tonytan_brb has quit IRC05:56
*** mjura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:58
*** apetrich has quit IRC06:01
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:02
*** sxc731_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:02
*** dkehn has quit IRC06:03
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:05
*** mjura has quit IRC06:05
*** sxc731_ has quit IRC06:05
*** mjura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:05
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:07
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:09
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:09
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:14
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:15
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:16
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:16
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC06:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:20
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC06:25
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:25
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC06:25
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:31
*** iyamahat has quit IRC06:33
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:35
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:36
*** apetrich has quit IRC06:44
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:46
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:51
*** bana_k has quit IRC06:52
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC06:57
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC06:57
*** dshakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC07:02
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:04
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:12
*** johnma has quit IRC07:14
*** Nikolay_St has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:16
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:16
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** sridharg has quit IRC07:19
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:20
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC07:22
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:23
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC07:26
*** neilus has quit IRC07:26
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC07:28
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:28
*** sdake has quit IRC07:30
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena07:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:40
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:42
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC07:45
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:46
*** mfedosin has quit IRC07:47
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:50
*** apetrich has quit IRC07:50
*** lexplua has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:51
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:51
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:52
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:55
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:55
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:56
*** panda|zZ is now known as panda07:56
*** lexplua has quit IRC07:56
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:57
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** kevo has quit IRC08:00
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC08:02
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC08:02
*** lexplua has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:04
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** lexplua has quit IRC08:05
*** bfernando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC08:06
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:12
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC08:14
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC08:17
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:17
*** dshakhray has quit IRC08:17
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC08:17
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:22
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:37
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC08:37
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:37
*** Akis__ has quit IRC08:38
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:41
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:48
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** thomnico has quit IRC08:49
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:49
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:53
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC08:55
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:57
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:01
*** zhongjun_ has quit IRC09:03
*** zhongjun_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:04
*** dshakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:07
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:08
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC09:10
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:11
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:13
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** ByPasS has quit IRC09:15
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:17
*** iyamahat has quit IRC09:18
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** rossella_s has quit IRC09:19
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:20
*** mickeys has quit IRC09:21
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:23
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC09:23
*** gongysh has quit IRC09:27
*** iberezovskiy|off is now known as iberezovskiy09:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:37
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:37
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:38
*** florianf has quit IRC09:45
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:47
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:49
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:56
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:58
*** zhurong has quit IRC10:00
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC10:02
*** matrohon has quit IRC10:05
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC10:07
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:08
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:09
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:12
*** jprovazn has quit IRC10:15
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:18
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:22
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC10:22
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:24
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:27
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC10:27
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC10:27
*** obondarev has quit IRC10:29
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:32
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:38
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC10:41
*** nmagnezi has quit IRC10:42
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:42
*** kberger has quit IRC10:47
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** kberger has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:53
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:57
*** obondarev has quit IRC10:58
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:06
*** dprince has quit IRC11:10
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:15
*** fzdarsky_ has quit IRC11:17
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC11:17
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:17
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC11:23
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:24
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC11:28
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:31
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** prateek has quit IRC11:38
*** ddieterly has quit IRC11:38
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:43
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC11:44
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC11:45
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|lunch11:47
*** egallen has quit IRC11:48
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:48
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** egallen has quit IRC11:51
*** coolsvap has quit IRC11:52
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch11:53
*** zigo has quit IRC11:54
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:58
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:58
*** zigo is now known as Guest8360111:59
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:59
*** baoli has quit IRC12:03
*** Guest83601 has quit IRC12:03
*** lbeliveau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:10
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:14
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:14
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC12:15
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC12:15
*** rarcea has quit IRC12:16
*** zigo_ has quit IRC12:17
*** banix has quit IRC12:17
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:18
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:18
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:25
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** florianf has quit IRC12:29
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:30
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC12:30
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:30
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** lexplua has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC12:31
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:35
*** ddieterly has quit IRC12:40
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:41
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC12:45
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC12:46
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:46
*** zigo_ has quit IRC12:48
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:51
*** armax has quit IRC12:51
*** jruzicka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:56
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:57
number80ping dirk toabctl IgorYozhikov number80 jruzicka jpena aplanas12:59
*** ccamacho|lunch is now known as ccamacho12:59
IgorYozhikovo/12:59
number80#startmeeting rpm_packaging12:59
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 12:59:49 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is number80. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:59
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"12:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging'12:59
number80#topic roll call12:59
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"12:59
number80#chair IgorYozhikov13:00
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov number8013:00
dirko/13:00
dirkhey13:00
number80#chair dirk13:00
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov dirk number8013:00
jruzickao/13:00
number80#chair jruzicka13:00
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov dirk jruzicka number8013:00
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
number80let's wait few more minutes13:00
IgorYozhikovok13:00
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena13:00
jpenao/13:01
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** astsmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
number80#chair jpena13:02
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov dirk jpena jruzicka number8013:02
number80I guess we can't expect more guests13:03
number80#topic welcome newcomers13:03
*** openstack changes topic to "welcome newcomers (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:03
number80as you saw this morning, we have two new contributors, Tony Xu and linbing13:03
number80does anyone of you know them?13:03
dirkI would assume they're sleeping by now :)13:04
number80Well, I think it would be nice if someone could contact them and mentor them13:04
number80especially as they're in a very different tz as most of us13:05
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC13:05
IgorYozhikovnumber80, yes I also saw13:05
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
number80#action number80 send them a welcome email13:05
IgorYozhikovthey uploaded a lot13:05
number80#topic Design Summit fishbowl follow-up13:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Design Summit fishbowl follow-up (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:06
*** liuyulong__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
dirknumber80: nice idea13:06
number80yes, I'm happy that new folks showed up :)13:07
number80not much change from last week, so I put a (incomplete) proposal for goals13:07
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
number80as not everyone will be at Barcelona Summit, I'd like people to give more thoughts about these goals13:08
dirkthats actually  a good topic13:08
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
dirkI would like to vote the existing 3rd party gates as voting13:08
dirkeven before the summit13:08
dirkbecause last week we merged something that broke the suse ci (probably by accident=)13:08
number80dirk: that's fine with me13:08
*** pcarver_ has quit IRC13:08
dirkand since we're always testing everything, every other review is currently listed as failed13:08
number80dirk: let's start by a formal thread on the list, and ask for a vote during next week meeting?13:09
number80but I agree that if we can, let's do it asap13:09
dirkworks for me13:09
dirkwell, its just asking the infra guys to set the flag13:09
dirkI guess as a PTL you can just ask :)13:10
IgorYozhikovdirk, why not, we spoke about voting more then half year ago13:10
number80#action number80 RFC on list to promote third-party CI as voting gates + schedule vote for next week meeting13:10
number80IgorYozhikov: I'd like to give time to your MOS CI teammates to participate in the discussion too13:10
number80but I'm +2 to promote both MOS and SUSE CI13:11
IgorYozhikovnumber80, me to13:11
IgorYozhikovthere were not so much issues related to misconfiguration13:11
IgorYozhikovso let's make them voting13:11
number80excellent13:12
number80anything else about goals?13:12
IgorYozhikovI need to speak with zigo about possibility of co-session13:12
number80IgorYozhikov: zigo_ answered dirk's email and he said he preferred a separate fishbowl for debian packaging13:13
number80but he'll join us for our fishbowl13:13
IgorYozhikovo i c13:13
IgorYozhikovnumber80, thanx13:13
number80what do you think about the minimal cloud goal?13:13
number80I'd like to focus on small set of services so that we iron out tooling issues13:14
IgorYozhikovnumber80, r u about to do packages for core components?13:14
IgorYozhikovplus horizon13:14
number80IgorYozhikov: I think that we need a proof of concept, because we may hit limitations in renderspec13:15
IgorYozhikovnova glance cinder neutron keystone horizon13:15
number80IgorYozhikov: ack13:15
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
dirknot sure if you guys saw it, but the sessions are scheduled13:15
IgorYozhikovdirk, already?13:15
dirkdeb and rpm packaging fishbowl is thursday late afternoon13:15
IgorYozhikovnope, will check13:15
astsmtlWhy can't we try to set it for Newton?13:16
dirkand our work sessions are friday morning13:16
number80astsmtl: minimal cloud? it's quite late13:16
astsmtlWe can try, and if there is not enough time we will move it to next release.13:17
IgorYozhikovnumber80, will this minimal cloud have a some kind of deployment test?13:17
IgorYozhikovjust not only core packages13:17
IgorYozhikovmight be AIO node?13:17
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC13:17
number80IgorYozhikov: yes, but if we managed to deploy AIO using our packages, multi-node shouldn't be hard13:18
IgorYozhikovyep13:18
IgorYozhikovlong term - single -> multi -> ha13:19
*** rossella_ has quit IRC13:19
number80*nods*13:19
number80#topic stable/newton branch13:19
IgorYozhikovnot it became more || less clear 4 me13:19
*** openstack changes topic to "stable/newton branch (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:19
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC13:19
*** kjw3 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:19
number80thank you dirk for adding the topic13:19
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:19
dirkso I was trying to get everything merged now for cutting stable/newton branch13:19
dirkis there anything that we still want to get in?13:19
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck13:20
dirkotherwise I'd say after the django_openstack_auth fix is in we're branching and then open up for merging all the new stuff that is post-newton13:20
number80I'd like to have https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343335/ too if possible13:20
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:21
number80dirk: btw, could you explain me how branching is done?13:21
IgorYozhikovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/374679/ ?13:21
*** armax has quit IRC13:21
dirknumber80: sure13:22
number80IgorYozhikov: non-essential for newton, but we can backport13:22
*** baoli_ has quit IRC13:22
dirknumber80: we can do that right after the meeting13:22
number80dirk: ack13:22
number80anything else on that topic?13:22
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
IgorYozhikovno from my side13:23
number80then, we can move to reviews13:24
number80#topic packages reviews13:24
*** openstack changes topic to "packages reviews (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:24
number80https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/rpm-packaging+status:open13:24
jpenawe've got a lot of them now :)13:24
IgorYozhikovI looked through a couple or them13:25
number80Yeah, but except the ones mentioned above, they won't be in newton cut :)13:25
jpenafair enough13:25
dirkyep13:26
jpenashould we abandon the duplicated ones?13:26
number80jpena: yes, I'm finishing it right now13:26
number80Yes, let's have our newcomers focusing on the ones13:27
*** baoli has quit IRC13:27
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:27
dirkI was postponing that review for master until we cut newton13:27
dirkso let me suggest one thing: we finish those two reviews13:27
IgorYozhikovalso it will be good if they will come to our irc13:27
dirkbranch13:27
dirkand then go forward13:27
number80dirk: wfm13:27
IgorYozhikov++13:28
IgorYozhikovafter branching anything required could be cherry-picked || back-ported13:28
IgorYozhikovto stable/newton13:28
number80*nods*13:29
*** ayoung has quit IRC13:30
jruzickasound good to me13:30
IgorYozhikovastsmtl, please check our CI readiness for branching13:30
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC13:30
IgorYozhikovnumber80, dirk, and here I have a question13:31
number80go ahead13:32
IgorYozhikovif we are going to cut new branches - will be correct to use same dependencies for current young master and releasing stable/newton13:32
IgorYozhikovor not13:32
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:33
number80considering that g-r has already changed between master and stable/newton, we'll shortly update our local copy too13:33
dirkyeah13:33
*** Leo_ has quit IRC13:33
dirkI am undecided on that a bit13:33
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:33
dirkI am tempted to swtich to requirements/ version and not have  copy13:33
IgorYozhikovI'm asking from perspective of packages set as Requires:13:34
astsmtlAre we supposed to rebuild all packages on CI right after branching?13:34
number80dirk: that'd be better indeed13:34
astsmtlOr we are going to bump release with CR's?13:34
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
number80dirk: what do you think about embedding distro overrides files instead and just clone requirements as-is?13:35
*** cleong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
number80astsmtl: I'd recommend that, but you can just fork current repo with existing rpms13:35
number80repo = binary rpms repo I mean13:36
astsmtlYou recommend rebuild without CR's, right?13:36
*** myoung|gone is now known as myoung13:37
number80no release bump between master and newton AFAIK13:37
IgorYozhikovnumber80, just rebuild to separate binary repo || just regenerate from master, right?13:38
*** Leo_ has quit IRC13:38
number80i'd say opention 1.13:39
IgorYozhikovok :)13:39
number80let's move to next topic13:40
dirknumber80: I am not sure what you mean by distro overrides?13:40
number80dirk: well, we overrides few stuff in upstream g-r like pytz13:40
number80RHEL7 has an older pytz than in g-r but with backports13:41
number80so we override this by providing a separate requirements file13:41
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:42
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:42
dirknumber80: ah, I see13:43
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
IgorYozhikovnumber80, and that is why in rh packages *reqs.txt are deleted during build stage?13:43
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
dirknumber80: do we have already a merge capability in renderspec?13:43
IgorYozhikovI'm about package specs13:43
dirke.g. add something like --requirements $foo --requirements $vendor-foo ?13:43
number80IgorYozhikov: yes, but it's partial answer, some requirements files have optional stuff and it breaks builds if we don't have them13:43
number80dirk: yes, should be easier to maintain13:43
*** zhusz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
number80dirk: yes13:44
number80I'm not 100% sure, it's by design, but the order matters when you pass requirements files13:44
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:46
dirknumber80: works for me actually13:46
number80ack13:46
dirkthe main reason I objected to that originally was because we couldn't control when stuff in requirements/ merges13:46
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:46
*** obondarev has quit IRC13:46
dirkwhich could break our ci at arbitrary intervals13:46
dirkwhich is why I wanted to have a copy that we can test and then merge13:47
number80that was the most sensible decision, we needed to get our CI maturing before adding more entropy13:47
dirkwell, the funny part is that the fuel ci isn't using it :)13:48
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
number80Yep13:48
number80(/me suggests to move to the next topics before we run out of time)13:49
number80I'm skipping pymod2pkg as there's no review13:49
number80#topic renderspec reviews13:49
*** openstack changes topic to "renderspec reviews (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:49
number80https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/renderspec+status:open13:49
jpenahere, I'd like to hear the Mirantis opinion on https://review.openstack.org/37090613:49
number80https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368262/1 is no brainer13:49
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC13:50
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:50
jpenaI see it's merged now, and my plan was to add the block to every spec file, so we can fix the requirement issues in RDO builds13:50
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:50
jruzickayay13:50
jpenawhen discussing it with jruzicka, he mentioned that if that's an issue we can have a 3rd flavor (suse,fedora,mos)13:51
number80jpena: most MOS packages respect this pattern too13:51
jpenanumber80: ack then, just wanted to be on the safe side13:51
number80but yes, having a mos flavor is always an option13:51
number80IgorYozhikov: ^13:52
astsmtlTBH, I don't understand the need to remove requirements.txt. Only pip performs automatic installation of dependepncies.13:52
jruzickayup let's keep it together until explicit reason to split emerges13:52
jruzickaastsmtl, due to magicks of pbr, the requirements are passed as install_requires13:52
number80astsmtl: if you keep it around, pbr will try to install whatever is in requirements even optional stuff or update versions if package version is lower13:52
astsmtl(Also pbr can be installed automatically, but it's a strong requirement anyway.)13:53
IgorYozhikovjpena, use    1 #!/usr/bin/python13:53
IgorYozhikov   2 # This script is used for additional checks for versions of dependencies.13:53
IgorYozhikov   313:53
IgorYozhikov   4 import sys13:53
IgorYozhikov   5 from pkg_resources import require13:53
IgorYozhikov   613:53
jruzickawhich means that the app will refuse to launch because arbitrary version comparision fails13:53
IgorYozhikov   713:53
IgorYozhikov   8 def test_check_requirements_conflicts(req):13:53
IgorYozhikov   9     try:13:53
IgorYozhikov  10         require(req)13:53
IgorYozhikov  11     except Exception as e:13:53
jruzickadude13:53
IgorYozhikov  12         print str(e)13:53
IgorYozhikov  13         exit(1)13:53
IgorYozhikov  1413:53
IgorYozhikov  15 test_check_requirements_conflicts(sys.argv[1])13:53
IgorYozhikovif deletion of reqs.txt will not affect this test - looks fine13:53
number80since koji has no internet access (a prerequisite for reproducible builds), builds will fail as pip can't download eggs from the internet13:53
number80IgorYozhikov: it shouldn't fail13:54
* dirk has to run13:54
astsmtljruzicka, number80 Never saw this.13:54
jruzickaastsmtl, IOW deleting reqs.txt stops version enforcing through python version13:54
dirknumber80: I'll ping you in a bit regarding the branching13:54
jruzickasince that's package manager job, we disable it13:55
IgorYozhikovnumber80, we run this test in package post install stage13:55
number80dirk: ack13:55
number80astsmtl: that's very common issue in python packaging for Fedora/CentOS and friends13:55
IgorYozhikovand test shows us if something went wrong from perspective of python13:55
astsmtlVersion enforcing is another case, and here you can remove requirements.txt but you can also patch it.13:55
number80ack13:55
jruzickaout of time13:55
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz13:56
number80astsmtl: patching it is a possibility, but it has drawbacks too13:56
*** ansmith has quit IRC13:56
jruzickaits redundant13:56
astsmtlnumber80, just try to python setup.py {build,install} anything where there are missing dependencies. Nothing is downloaded.13:57
number80but as jruzicka pointed out, let's move the discussion to the usual channel13:57
jruzickawe already have dependency management in our package manager13:57
number80astsmtl: I have failed builds in koji that says the contrary13:57
astsmtlPlease, show me.13:57
*** rarcea has quit IRC13:57
jruzickayou can tell pbr not to download anything13:57
jruzickabut the version enforcing still continues13:58
number80jruzicka: interesting13:58
number80astsmtl: can we continue the discussion on the list?13:58
*** yangyapeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
astsmtlOfc.13:58
number80we're running out of time13:58
*** yangyape_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
number80thank you for attending, and see you next week (or in the channel)13:59
number80#endmeeting13:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"13:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 13:59:22 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-09-22-12.59.html13:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-09-22-12.59.txt13:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-09-22-12.59.log.html13:59
*** astsmtl has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
slashme#startmeeting freezer14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 14:00:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slashme. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
*** matrohon has quit IRC14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: freezer)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'freezer'14:00
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
szaherHi slashme14:00
yangyape_hello slashme14:00
szaher\o/14:00
slashmeHi everyone :)14:01
szaher\m/14:01
*** yangyapeng_ has quit IRC14:01
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** HeOS has quit IRC14:01
*** dshakhray has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
slashmeLet's wait a few minutes to see if anyone else is connecting14:01
slashmeAs usual, recap and agenda is available here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings14:01
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
zhuszHi, slashme14:02
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC14:02
yangyape_hi zhusz14:02
timothyb89hi all14:03
zhuszHi yangpeng14:03
slashmeHi zhusz and timothyb8914:03
*** sridharg has quit IRC14:03
*** domhnallw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
domhnallwo/14:04
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC14:05
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** panbalag_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** panbalag_ has quit IRC14:06
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
slashmeOkay, lets start.14:07
ddieterlyhi14:07
slashmeThe agenda is pretty empty today.14:07
slashmehi ddieterly14:07
ddieterlyhi slashme14:07
slashme#topic barcelona design sessions14:07
*** openstack changes topic to "barcelona design sessions (Meeting topic: freezer)"14:07
slashmeWe have two design sessions room at the summit this cycle14:08
*** Leom has quit IRC14:08
slashmeIf there is no modification, our slots should be on the Tuesday14:08
yangyape_congratulations14:09
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC14:09
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
slashmeWe have one fishbowl room :Big room, open to the public, can host aroun 50 people, perfect for broader topic and to gather opinions from the community.14:09
*** panbalag_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
*** panbalag_ has quit IRC14:10
slashmeAnd one Working room: Smaller, that can host aroud 15 people. These are more intended for engineering discussions between developpers14:10
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
slashmeFor now, we are completly open to ideas about what you thing should be discussed arounf Freezer at the summit.14:11
slashmehttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings14:11
slashmeOops, wrong link14:11
slashmeHere: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barcelona_summit_preparation14:11
slashmeddieterly and I will be at the summit. Is anyone else going ?14:12
ddieterlywe'll have a great time14:12
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** panatl has quit IRC14:12
*** takashin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** takashin has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** janki has quit IRC14:16
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
zhuszwe seem have no more topic14:19
slashmezhusz: Indeed14:19
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
slashmeIs there anything that someone would like to discuss ?14:20
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK14:20
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC14:21
*** tovchinnikova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck14:23
ddieterlynot from my end14:23
ddieterlycurrrently working on cassandra schema for monasca14:23
ddieterlythe cassandra knowledge will transfer nicely to dedup in freezer14:24
slashmeInteresting :)14:24
zhuszWill freezer-scheduler be deprecated next release?14:26
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC14:26
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:27
slashmeNo14:28
slashmeThe only thing we deprecate is the command line14:28
slashmeSo basicaly :14:28
yangyape_apiclient to python-freezerclient14:28
slashmeYou will be able to do : freezer-scheduler [start/stop/status]14:28
slashmeand all other operation should be done through the "freezer" cli14:29
slashmefrom python-freezerclient14:29
yangyape_guys  if you have time please review freezerclient devstack   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367251/14:29
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
*** panatl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** obondarev has quit IRC14:31
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
zhuszOk. I see.14:32
zhuszscheduler issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368082/14:33
*** m3m0 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
zhuszfreezer-scheduler stop/status is not available when the log file is set in config file.14:35
*** xyang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC14:36
zhuszBecause the log info was written to /tmp/freezer-scheduler.pid file.14:36
zhuszI'll provide a patch for this issue.14:36
zhuszyapeng, I'm checking your patch.14:38
yangyape_cli freezer-scheduler  --log-file  ti is ok, but have a config to scheduler.conf is it unavaible?14:38
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
yangyape_zhusz: :)   it is very good to have a patch.14:39
zhuszyapeng: Yes.14:42
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:43
slashmeThank you for the patch zhusz14:44
*** beslemon has quit IRC14:46
*** zhonghua has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC14:51
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** marst has quit IRC14:54
*** daemontool has quit IRC14:54
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** aovchinnikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** ansmith has quit IRC14:58
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:58
slashmeOkay, That's all for today14:59
*** jseiler_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
slashme#endmeeting14:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 14:59:13 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-09-22-14.00.html14:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-09-22-14.00.txt14:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-09-22-14.00.log.html14:59
*** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
* slashme waves at Manilla Folks. Have a good meeting.14:59
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:59
bswartzlol14:59
*** rmart04 has quit IRC14:59
* bswartz waves at slashme15:00
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 15:00:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:00
bswartzhello all15:00
gouthamrhello o/15:00
cknightHi15:00
gansohello15:00
vponomaryovHello15:00
tovchinnikova\\//15:00
tbarronhi15:00
jseiler_hi15:00
aovchinnikovhi15:00
dustinshey-o15:00
dustins\o15:00
zhonghuahello15:00
markstur_hi15:00
bswartz#agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings15:00
zhongjun_hi15:00
bswartz#topic Specs process15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs process (Meeting topic: manila)"15:01
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37488315:01
bswartzI had hoped to have the above proposal ready earlier in the week so you all would have have time to review it before today15:02
xyang2hi15:02
bswartzhowever various debugging took all my time and I didn't get to write it until this morning15:02
bswartzso I don't expect anyone to have read it yet15:02
gouthamryou'll be surprised :)15:03
bswartzthe proposal is based on conversations I've had with the core reviewer team15:03
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
cknightgouthamr: +115:03
*** dasanind has quit IRC15:03
*** yangyape_ has quit IRC15:03
*** mjura has quit IRC15:03
bswartzpeople should provide feedback using gerrit, but I'll briefly outline what the proposal is15:04
bswartzwe introduced specs in newton, but didn't have any process around them, and ultimately they were not too valuable15:04
bswartzalso during newton the team got overloaded with too much new stuff and we failed to focus on the important stuff until it was too late15:04
bswartzso I'm trying to fix that for future releases, and that document outlines my plan15:05
mkodererhello15:05
bswartzIn particular I regret all of the time that was spent on features which didn't get much/any review attention15:06
*** egallen has quit IRC15:06
*** zengyingzhe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
bswartzin particular, the snapshot semantics stuff from tpsilva/cknight, the share backup proposal from zhongjun_, and the driver-private-share-data API from xyang, amoung others15:07
vponomaryovuser messages?15:07
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:07
bswartzvponomaryov: yeah that was another failure15:08
bswartzI should also mention that while I'd like to start a new process for Ocata and later, the Ocata release will be special due to how short it is15:08
bswartzso this proposal will probably benefit us more for Pike/Queens/R...15:09
vkmco/15:09
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
bswartzanyways please provide feedback on the proposal through gerrit and if we need to discuss it more next week we can15:11
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
bswartzany questions before we move on?15:11
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
bswartz#topic Ocata Design Summit15:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Ocata Design Summit (Meeting topic: manila)"15:11
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC15:12
bswartz#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-ocata-design-summit-topics15:12
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
bswartzSo I created this etherpad last week, and nobody has proposed anything yet15:12
bswartzBecause of the shortness of the Ocata release, my personal preference is to focus on retiring technical debt15:12
bswartzhowever due to the failures of the Newton release we have a substantial number of "almost done" features which may be worth of consideration15:13
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
*** zigo_ is now known as zigo15:14
bswartzfor the design summit, we have 2 fishbowls and 4 working sessions, same as Austin15:14
bswartzthere are more conflicts with Cinder than ever before though15:15
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
gansobswartz: has the sessions schedule been published?15:15
bswartzI know ttx tried to avoid conflicts, but the schedule is getting more complex15:15
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC15:15
bswartzganso: drafts have gone out -- I'm not sure if a public announcement has been made15:16
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:17
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
tbarronganso: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TQ-RSlbiBBEclkonIbfUP7R1ExZSJylF1uiEKV2G_Cw/pubhtml?gid=1107826458&single=true15:18
bswartzanyways, if you have a topic you really want to discuss in Barcelona, please get it up on etherpad so we can start voting next week15:19
gansotbarron: thanks!15:19
bswartztbarron: ty15:19
xyang2bswartz: for new drivers, do we still have the same deadline?  merge date is Ocata-3?  when does the driver need to be submitted?15:20
bswartzxyang2: that's a good question15:20
bswartz#topic new driver deadline15:20
*** openstack changes topic to "new driver deadline (Meeting topic: manila)"15:20
*** tremble has quit IRC15:21
bswartzxyang2: I think we should avoid deciding on the specific deadline until after we agree on our specs process/deadlines15:21
xyang2ok15:21
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:21
bswartzhowever I'd be in favor of keeping it more or less the same -- maybe a bit earlier for Ocata just because of the short release15:21
xyang2bswartz: I got questions on that because we do have a new driver coming in Ocata15:22
bswartz#link https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html15:22
bswartzso if we were to keep the deadline at feature freeze minus 3 weeks, that would put us at Jan 0215:23
bswartzand due to holidays, those last 3 weeks are going to be a mess15:23
*** zhusz has quit IRC15:23
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
xyang2bswartz: ok, thanks15:24
bswartzI need to find out when holidays fall this year and who will be affected when15:24
bswartzpossibly we can keep it the same, or possibly we might want new drivers before christmas, to account for the holiday time for reviewers15:25
vponomaryovbswartz: +1 before christmas15:25
zhongjun_Is there still have FFE?15:25
markstur_vponomaryov, which christmas?15:25
*** caowei has quit IRC15:25
vponomaryovmarkstur_: the erliest15:26
vponomaryov))15:26
bswartzwhen is orthodox christmas this year?15:26
bswartzdoes it move around like the chinese new year does?15:26
gansobswartz:  Thursday, January 715:26
gansobswartz: ^ according to google15:26
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
bswartzlooks like chinese new year is kind enough to fall after feature freeze this year15:27
gansobswartz: wait, maybe it should be 201715:27
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
gansobswartz: scratch that, should be Saturday, January 715:27
xyang2bswartz: right around that time15:28
bswartzxyang2: how do you feel about making the deadline feature freeze minus 5 weeks?15:28
gansobswartz: according to google, chinese new year isSaturday, January 2815:28
bswartzthat would put us at Dec 19 -- before the holidays in the US15:28
xyang2bswartz: fine with me.  I'd like it earlier15:28
bswartzearlier than Dec 19?15:29
xyang2bswartz: Dec 19 is good15:29
bswartzanyone opposed?15:29
bswartz#agreed driver proposal deadline Dec 1915:30
*** banix has quit IRC15:30
bswartzafter we figure out the specs deadline stuff I'll send out a ML announcement with all the dates15:30
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
*** panda is now known as panda|break15:31
*** kaisers has quit IRC15:31
bswartzand we can also push a change to the schedule repo so people can find the deadlines using google (I've gotten complaints that the ML posts are hard to google)15:31
bswartz#topic open discussion15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:31
xyang2bswartz: you don't have problem with a CoprHD Manila driver, right?  It's already in Cinder15:31
gansomy vacation starts on Monday September 26th and I return on October 15th. I will try to show up in the weekly meetings whenever possible.15:31
bswartzganso: enjoy your vacation!15:32
bswartzit's a great time to take off, as long as no critical bugs pop up before release15:32
dustinsI got an email from the docs folks asking for volunteers for testing the Installation Documentation for Manila15:32
gansobswartz: thanks15:32
bswartzdustins: we've had people in the channel who couldn't get it to work15:33
bswartzare they the testers or is the request for testing coming because they can't get it to work?15:33
gouthamrdustins: yay15:33
tbarronwe need some admin-oriented doc for lvm driver :)15:33
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:33
dustinsYeah, they're coming down on the projects and asking folks to have a good look at all docs, but especially the Installation Doc15:33
bswartztbarron: is it not in the config guide yet?15:33
gouthamrdustins: i was hoping to do the reverse.. ask if we can get volunteers to test it..15:33
dustinsThey're asking projects to check the documentation for their respective projects15:34
* tbarron checks, maybe his info is stale15:34
bswartzyes this is a good time to update all the config ref docs for the stuff that changed in newton15:34
* dustins still gets the docs liaison emails15:34
gouthamrdustins: but needed this update to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359491/15:34
gouthamr#plug: ^ please review15:34
bswartzand to review the docs in general for accuracy15:34
dustinsYes, all of that needs to happen15:35
bswartzgouthamr: should be #shamelessplug lol15:35
dustinsI know there's a lot, we're all super busy with our own things, but it really needs to be done15:35
gouthamr:P15:35
dustinsJust to save ourselves from heartbreak and headache in the future15:35
markstur_gouthamr changes his name to shameless15:36
gouthamrnow's a good time for a docblitz15:36
gouthamrmarkstur_: lol..15:36
*** njohnston_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:36
bswartzalright anything else?15:37
tbarroni'll pull shameless's patch and re-read to see if my concerns are addressed.  I was concerned that we keep pointinig newbies to the generic driver, like sending red ridiing hood into the woods.15:37
*** lexplua has quit IRC15:37
markstur_lol15:37
bswartzI think we're done early15:37
dustinsI might make an etherpad with all of the docs we have and then call for volunteers15:37
vkmcyes! I wanted to get your feedback wrt some feature that has been in my mind15:37
bswartzvkmc: like what?15:37
vkmcconsidering I'm just giving my first steps on Manila, I'd appreciate your comments15:37
gouthamrdustins: shameless +115:37
vkmcso... this started with a bug in the ui15:38
gouthamr#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372805/15:38
vkmcbasically we are displaying all protocols on the create share modal without checking if it's deployed in the control plane15:38
*** zengyingzhe_ has quit IRC15:39
vkmcfrom there, I noticed that there is no direct way to get which protocols are enabled15:39
bswartzI've heard this complaint before15:39
vkmcwe have a setting in manila.conf, but that's it15:39
vkmcso... for now I proposed a workaround for this from the ui side15:39
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|afk15:39
vkmc#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372805/15:39
bswartzwe need a new API to expose the list, and the question is what that should look like15:39
vkmcbut I was thinking this should be better fixed by implementing a capabilities endpoint for Manila15:40
vkmcas we have in other projects15:40
vkmcyeah15:40
bswartzit probably makes sense for it to be a per-share-type thing15:40
gouthamrany reason we can't use scheduler-stats15:40
gouthamr?15:40
bswartz-1 for capabilities endpoint15:40
gouthamrit gives you a list of pool capabilities15:40
vkmcI could work on a spec for it, and later discuss it...  but preferred to get your input on if this is a good idea or not15:40
bswartzgouthamr: admin only15:40
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC15:40
vkmcbswartz, why the -1 for capabilities endpoint?15:41
bswartzvkmc: in Manila we expose such things on the share types15:41
bswartzso the logical approach would be for each share type to have a list of supported protocols15:41
xyang2vkmc, bswartz: this is similar to this one in cinder: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/discovering-system-capabilities15:41
bswartzhowever, doing do in a way that's backwards compatible could be tough15:41
gouthamrxyang2: +115:42
vkmcxyang2, yeah, exactly what I was looking :)15:42
vkmcbswartz, I see... yeah15:42
tbarronvkmc: one question is whether the approach taken in  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372805/ would be acceptable as a short-term fix (before you add unit tests, etc.) - though of course we'd work on an API longer term15:42
vkmcindeed, thanks tbarron15:42
bswartzxyang2: I haven't followed that discussion in cinder, but I definitely have my opinions15:42
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:42
tbarronvkmc: as customers need a fix real soon, and we might have a bit of discussion on the right way to go for ocata, or for pike, or ..;\15:43
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
xyang2vkmc: bswartz: the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350310/  is on hold to get some cross project consensus on the api15:43
*** vinaypotluri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
tbarronxyang2: exactly15:43
tbarronI think we may need a near term and a medium term approach unless the medium term solution can be accelearated15:44
gouthamrthe author proposed to write a spec on the API-WG..15:44
bswartzxyang2: cinder created a real mess when they added a whole new feature which was "turned off" by default15:44
tbarronaccelerated15:44
vkmcyeah... if we probably want to check how this turns out to be for Cinder15:44
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC15:44
xyang2bswartz: blame cinder for everything:)15:44
bswartzxyang2: cinder is an easy target :-)15:44
xyang2:)15:44
gouthamrkarate chops with cinder blocks15:45
cknightxyang2: not blame, just learn from them what works and what fails miserably15:45
vkmchaha gouthamr++15:45
gansogouthamr: it is super effective! :P15:45
xyang2cknight: that's ok.  cinder in turn blames nova:)15:45
vkmcsomething like... "what would Cinder do?" driven development15:45
markstur_new topic? cinder bashing15:45
*** dsariel has quit IRC15:45
dustinscknight: Yes, learn from what worked and what did not, let's not throw our block storage buddies under the bus15:45
cknightxyang2: :-) exactly15:45
bswartzokay I think that's sufficient cinder bashing15:46
bswartzvkmc: we do need a spec for this15:46
vkmcok, so... would you like me to work on some spec...15:46
vkmcI was going to say that15:46
vkmc:D15:46
gouthamrvkmc: +115:46
bswartzagain my preference is for something akin to our share-type public extra specs15:46
vkmcand we can later discuss it next meeting (or another... as we see fit... we have other priorities now for sure :)15:47
bswartzhowever backwards compatibility will be hard15:47
vkmcyeah :/ that's my main concern bswartz15:47
bswartzalso there will be upgrade issues15:47
tbarronbswartz: vkmc it would be good for people to look at the existing review to see if it's DOA or whether a short-term fix is OK too15:47
bswartzwhen you upgrade from newton to ocata, how will manila figure out what protocols to enable for each share type15:48
bswartz?15:48
vponomaryovprotocols are enabled via config and it will not be changed15:48
tbarron#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372805/15:48
gouthamri think we can deprecate the horizon config option safely..15:48
bswartzvkmc: if you'll be in barcelona that would be a good design summit topic15:48
vkmcbswartz, I will be there yes, and I would like to discuss it then!15:49
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
bswartzput something on the etherpad then15:49
bswartzanything else before we end the meeting?15:49
zhongjun_I have one15:49
vkmcvponomaryov, agree, I'm proposing to add a way to retrieve which protocols are enabled15:49
vkmcbswartz, will do, thanks15:49
zhongjun_Could you please pay attention to enable IPv6 feature?15:50
zhongjun_link:http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2016-09/msg01487.html15:50
zhongjun_spec link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362786/15:50
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
zhongjun_Thanks all15:50
gouthamrzhongjun_: sure..15:50
bswartzzhongjun_: yes I think ipv6 would be a good thing to focus on in ocata15:50
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]15:50
bswartzit feels small enough to fix the small release yet will offer large value15:51
cknightzhongjun_: please add that to the etherpad15:51
bswartzzhongjun_: will you be in barcelona?15:51
zhongjun_bswartz, cknight: ok, I will add it later15:51
*** kjw3 has quit IRC15:51
bswartzcknight: the etherpad is for summit topics -- we should omit stuff if key people can't attend15:51
zhongjun_bswartz: I am not sure15:51
bswartzand cover those items in another venue15:51
bswartzokay, well if there's a chance you'll be there I suggest proposing it on the etherpad zhongjun_15:52
zhongjun_bswartz: ok15:53
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly15:53
*** kaisers has quit IRC15:54
bswartzokay thanks everyone15:54
*** xarses has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
bswartztalk to you next week15:54
bswartz#endmeeting15:54
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:54
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 15:54:41 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:54
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-09-22-15.00.html15:54
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-09-22-15.00.txt15:54
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-09-22-15.00.log.html15:54
*** m3m0 has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
*** jseiler_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
vkmcthanks all o/15:56
*** nmagnezi has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** tovchinnikova has quit IRC15:56
*** markstur_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** njohnston has quit IRC15:59
*** njohnston_ is now known as njohnston16:00
xarses#startmeeting fuel16:00
xarses#chair xarses16:00
xarsesTodays Agenda:16:00
xarses#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda16:00
xarsesWho's here?16:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 16:00:10 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is xarses. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'fuel'16:00
openstackCurrent chairs: xarses16:00
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** bfernando has quit IRC16:00
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
maximov_hi16:01
ashtokolovhi16:01
ashtokolovxarses: ping?)16:01
xarses=)16:02
xarseslets get going then16:02
xarses#topic Barcelona Design Summit track layout  (ashtokolov) (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TQ-RSlbiBBEclkonIbfUP7R1ExZSJylF1uiEKV2G_Cw/pubhtml?gid=1107826458&single=true)16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Barcelona Design Summit track layout (ashtokolov) (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TQ-RSlbiBBEclkonIbfUP7R1ExZSJylF1uiEKV2G_Cw/pubhtml?gid=1107826458&single=true) (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:02
ashtokolovSo folks, I would like to highlight that we have slot allocation16:02
ashtokolovYour suggestions about topics allocation are welcome!16:03
ashtokolovwe have 2 fb16:03
ashtokolovand 4 workrooms16:03
maximov_my suggestion is to discuss upgrades, what we need to implement in fuel to enable upgrades of fuel + plugins16:04
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC16:04
xarses#topic Barcelona Deisgn Summit planning https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Barcelona Deisgn Summit planning https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:04
maximov_and do how do want to integrate fuel with our upgrade scripts (octane16:04
ashtokolovCould you please leave your comments here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning16:04
*** zhonghua has quit IRC16:04
ashtokolov#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning16:04
maximov_sure16:04
*** myoung is now known as myoung|biab16:04
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
ashtokolovwe will have very reduced representation16:05
*** neilus has quit IRC16:05
ashtokolovso we are going to involve tripleO guys into our discussions16:05
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]16:05
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly16:05
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]16:06
ashtokolovkozhukalov: any thoughts around allocation?16:06
ashtokolovlooks like he is afk16:07
ashtokolovlet's move on?16:07
maximov_yes16:07
ashtokolov#topic Barcelona Deisgn Summit planning https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning16:08
ashtokolovoops)16:08
xarsesI already switched it =)16:08
ashtokolovthanks!16:08
ashtokolovso I did some changes16:08
ashtokolovI've removed PAO discussion16:08
ashtokolovand added IaC16:09
ashtokolovany objections?16:09
*** mars_toktonaliev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
ashtokolovxarses: maximov_ kozhukalov ?16:09
xarsesnope, we are probably missing some things to talk about16:10
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
xarsesI will see if I can remember any more16:10
*** thomnico has quit IRC16:10
ashtokolovthank you so much16:11
ashtokolovfolks, please feel free to add your ideas to this etherpad16:11
ashtokolovthat's all from my side16:11
ashtokolovdo we have any other topics for today?16:11
xarses#topic open discuss16:12
*** openstack changes topic to "open discuss (Meeting topic: fuel)"16:12
xarsesif there isn't anything else, I'll close the meeting shortly16:12
*** marst has quit IRC16:12
ashtokolovlooks like all top contributors have a meeting right now16:12
ashtokolovso let's move all discussions to the next meeting16:13
xarsessounds good16:13
ashtokolovthank you guys!16:13
xarses#endmeeting16:13
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:13
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 16:13:35 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:13
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-09-22-16.00.html16:13
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-09-22-16.00.txt16:13
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-09-22-16.00.log.html16:13
*** xarses has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:15
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC16:21
*** Nikolay_St has quit IRC16:22
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** xyang2 has quit IRC16:27
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** thomnico_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly16:31
*** baoli has quit IRC16:31
*** thomnico has quit IRC16:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:36
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
*** aovchinnikov has quit IRC16:38
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:39
*** mwhahaha has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:39
*** edtubill has quit IRC16:39
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:39
*** derekh has quit IRC16:40
*** zigo has quit IRC16:41
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
*** capnoday has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
*** capnoday has quit IRC16:46
*** capnoday has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** capnoday has quit IRC16:46
*** mionkin has quit IRC16:47
*** liuyulong__ has quit IRC16:47
*** dg____ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:47
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** thomnico_ has quit IRC16:50
*** mionkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** zigo is now known as Guest1865616:52
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC16:53
*** ccneill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
*** dasanind has quit IRC16:56
*** greenhorn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
*** Guest18656 has quit IRC16:56
*** mdong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** tmcpeak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** Prem_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** michaelxin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
hyakuhei#startmeeting Security17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 17:00:08 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hyakuhei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Security)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'security'17:00
lhindso/17:00
sigmaviruso/17:00
michaelxino/17:00
hyakuheio/17:00
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
hyakuhei#chair tmcpeak17:00
elmikoo/17:00
unrahulo/17:00
openstackCurrent chairs: hyakuhei tmcpeak17:00
tmcpeako/17:00
Daviey\o17:00
knangiao/17:00
mdongo/17:00
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
ccneillo/17:01
hyakuheiRighto guys, as normal the agenda is over here #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-agenda17:01
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
vinaypotlurio/17:01
browneo/17:01
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** mvaldes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
tkelseyo/ all17:02
tmcpeakpacked meeting today :D17:02
hyakuheiGood turnout today...17:02
hyakuheiSo I suppose we should level-set17:02
tkelseylol17:02
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
lhindsnice blog post hyakuhei (from my speed read)17:02
hyakuheiMost of the meeting today will be talking about the future of the Security Project17:02
michaelxineven elmiko is here17:02
greenhornAdam here, just listening this round17:03
hyakuheiWhich, as lhinds alluded to, I blogged about here #link https://openstack-security.github.io/organization/2016/09/22/maturing-the-security-project.html17:03
dg____o/17:03
tmcpeakwelcome greenhorn17:03
hyakuheiThanks for joining us greenhorn17:03
greenhornyou bet17:03
Davieyhyakuhei: great blog post, well outlined and reflective17:03
* elmiko waves at michaelxin 17:03
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
*** iyamahat has quit IRC17:04
hyakuheiThanks Daviey the truth is there are things we need to do better, this has been a welcome wakeup call in that regard17:04
Daviey+117:04
hyakuheiI think dhellmann might be joining us today?17:04
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC17:04
hyakuheittx also may want to be involved17:04
dhellmanno/17:05
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:05
elmikowow17:05
hyakuheielmiko ?17:05
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
hyakuhei#topic Future of the Security Project17:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Future of the Security Project (Meeting topic: Security)"17:05
elmikooh, just emoting about the big-wigs getting involved ;)17:05
hyakuheiIt's nice to matter ;)17:06
elmikodefinitely17:06
elmikoi didn't think my pulling back would have such a big effect.... /s17:06
hyakuheiSo yes, I missed the PTL election, for the second time. I had what most people would call a good reason but it was still a major screwup on my part and I hold my hand up to that17:06
michaelxinhaha17:06
tmcpeakso for starters, is there anybody in here that wants to go to working group, and  if so, why?17:06
michaelxingood blog17:06
hyakuheiIt did however raise a bunch of issues beyond "why is there no PTL"17:06
ccneilllike "what is a PTL, really?"17:07
tmcpeakincluding others that aren't OSSP members and want us to be a working group17:07
ccneillespecially for our project17:07
hyakuheiWhich lead me to look at a number of things I hadn't really been aware of (likely because I was grandfathered into PTL) like the project team guide17:07
*** ralonsoh_ has quit IRC17:07
*** zigo_ has quit IRC17:07
dg____tmcpeak - it would be good to get some clarity from dhellman over 'what a working group is' and 'how is it different to a project team'17:07
hyakuheidhellmann I'm not really sure where to take this conversation. Do you have time to take a look at my blog post ?17:07
greenhornand possibly the risk of having one become a PTL by just volunteering from outside the project. if I thought about it, others might17:07
hyakuheigreenhorn You're absolutely right but I don't want to focus on the election17:08
hyakuheiThat's not going to happen again17:08
greenhornsure sure17:08
sigmavirusgreenhorn: also you have to qualify to be PTL first17:08
dhellmannhyakuhei : I'm looking now, but let me also try to answer some of the questions17:08
hyakuheiof course.17:08
dhellmannfirst, it's very unlikely that someone who has not contributed at all to the team would be "appointed" to lead the team17:08
sigmavirusSo it would be unlikely to be totally outside the project17:08
dhellmannyeah, I mean if you all decided to leave openstack entirely that would be a different story, but no one thinks that's what happened17:09
dhellmannand just to be completely clear, I have no preconceived notion of the best outcome here other than that we should help the team find what it thinks is the best outcome17:09
dhellmannso exploring the idea of a WG instead of a big tent team is just that, a discussion exploring it17:10
hyakuheiMy position is that there are clearly things that we need to do to be better community members, I think I can guide us to that place and that's what I want to do. I think we should stay in the big tent, at least until we've done a good job of showing that we should work that way.17:10
dhellmannas to the difference, there are a couple of areas to talk about17:10
*** iberezovskiy is now known as iberezovskiy|off17:10
*** mdong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
dhellmannhyakuhei : great, I am happy to support you in that if that's what the team agrees to17:11
michaelxinDo we want to vote?17:11
dhellmanna working group is a less formal structure than a project team. membership in a working group does not automatically confer atc status, which means members don't automatically get to vote for tc just by participating in the wg17:11
tmcpeakmichaelxin: +117:11
lhindsI also really believe we need no change, we know where we went wrong, but aside to that productivity and synergy in the group is great17:11
Davieydhellmann: and less summit timetable?17:12
dhellmannif they have atc status from elsewhere (patches in another project, or extra-atc status from another project) that would give them voting rights in those project elections and the tc election17:12
tkelseylhinds: +117:12
sigmavirusDaviey: yes, but that's already something that's changing with the split of the summit17:12
dhellmannyes, a working group is likely to have fewer summit resources, although we don't know for sure what the ptg allocation is going to look like17:12
ccneillfor precedent purposes, looking at projects vs. working groups, it's not entirely clear that there is a "right" and "wrong" way. QA is a project, performance is a working group17:12
*** ganso has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** mdong has quit IRC17:13
*** mdong_ is now known as mdong17:13
tmcpeaklet's vote on big-tent, working group17:13
sigmavirusccneill: so that's the thing, is that we occupy both spaces in a way17:13
tmcpeak#startvote17:13
sigmavirustmcpeak: can we wait until people have all the information?17:13
openstackUnable to parse vote topic and options.17:13
dhellmannit's quite likely, but I'm not the authority on this, that the security team would be considered cross-project enough to meet on the first day or two of the ptg, leaving vertical team meetings for later in the week17:13
tmcpeaksigmavirus: ?17:13
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
tmcpeakI didn't do it correctly anyway17:13
sigmavirustmcpeak: dhellmann is still answering questions17:13
hyakuheidhellmann we've often worn two hats in that regard17:13
tmcpeakok17:14
hyakuheiThat'll be even more the case with our TA work complimenting the VMT17:14
hyakuheiI'm looking forward to exploring how things will work with the ptg too17:14
dhellmannyes, there's a bit of grey area there but the case can be made either way17:14
tmcpeaksomething that I brought up yesterday, and was echoed by others is that we're likely to receive a measurable drop in participation and funding for a working group17:14
sigmavirusccneill: to explain, since AIUI you're new to openstack, performance WG issues guidelines/suggestions/etc. and doesn't produce much of a deliverable besides documented best practices (like the API WG)17:14
dg____with my corporate hat on, I think I will struggle to get funds for contribution to working group, particuarly things like meals at meetups, etc. I realise this will change with ptg, but historically we have funded mid-cycles etc.17:15
*** Nikolay_St has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
Davieydhellmann: Well truth be told, there were issues in previous summit where required people couldn't be there due to clashes.  Would WG make cross-project this more possible? who knows17:15
dhellmannccneill is right to point out the performance working group. another example is the new architecture group17:15
sigmavirusccneill: while QA works on tempest, hacking, etc.17:15
ccneillsigmavirus: right. so in those two buckets, I see us doing both of those things (tools + docs)17:15
*** gouthamr has quit IRC17:15
dhellmannDaviey: couldn't attend at all, or couldn't attend specific session(s)?17:15
ccneillso I think logically it makes sense that we should come to a decision about which we think WE are17:15
sigmavirusccneill: although from what I gathered yesterday from private conversations, we've been more tooling heavy17:15
ccneillsince we are best able to assess our goals vs. the larger OS goals17:15
Davieydhellmann: specific17:16
*** sicarie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
dhellmannDaviey : ok17:16
hyakuheiMy personal opinion (which I tend to be stating a lot at the moment) is that I'd like for us to stay in the big tent and up our game in terms of operating appropriately in that space we can re-assess at that point.17:16
dg____sigmavirus - dong forget the security guide, OSSNs and security review (TA) work17:16
hyakuheiNothing is set in stone17:16
*** dasanind has quit IRC17:16
dhellmannthose sorts of conflicts are one of the things we're trying to address with the new ptg schedule17:16
hyakuheiI'm cautiously optimistic about the ptg.17:16
dg____+117:17
greenhornWG or BigTent, do either prevent the work from getting done or is it funding related mostly?17:17
sigmavirusdg____: right, I said we do both, but have leaning more towards tooling lately (based on the impression of people more aware than I am of the docs portion)17:17
dhellmannyeah, we're going to need to hold a ptg once to really figure out what we need to change17:17
michaelxinwhat's ptg?17:17
hyakuheigreenhorn there's more of a disconnect with regards to use being a gating function for the VMT re the changes to the vulnerability managed tag17:17
DavieyIn the future, it might be piratical for OSSP to become a WG which focusses on projects in their own right (which the OSSP is currently guardian of)17:17
hyakuheimichaelxin the breakout of the design sessions from the conferences17:17
Davieypractical*17:18
dhellmannmichaelxin : sorry, "project team gathering" is the name of the new contributor-only event to be held in february next year17:18
michaelxinThanks hyakuhei dhellmann17:18
*** dane_leblanc_ has quit IRC17:18
sigmavirusgreenhorn: so some people have asserted that we will lose people working on OSSP if it becomes a WG17:18
*** bana_k has quit IRC17:18
hyakuheiMe among them.17:18
tmcpeakme too17:18
*** florianf has quit IRC17:19
michaelxinOSIC will suffer too.17:19
dhellmannhyakuhei, tmcpeak: you would be lost to the team, or you think that will be an outcome?17:19
michaelxinIf OSSP is not a project, it is very likely Rackspace and Intel will stop contributing.17:19
elmikowow... that's huge imo17:19
tmcpeakI personally will get considerable less (if any) time commitment17:19
dhellmannthat's unfortunate17:19
michaelxinFor OSIC project.17:19
ccneillI can't say for sure, but myself, mdong, unrahul, vinaypotluri, and knangia all work on OSSP projects full-time; I can't speak for OSIC, but it's definitely a risk that they don't continue to fund us17:20
hyakuheiIt shouldn't (and isn't) just about funding17:20
hyakuheibut that's a major concern for me17:20
lhindsI think we are thinking of changes cars as we had a flat tyre. We just need to monitor for announcements better, but everything else from my end was working really well.17:20
dhellmannsure, I share that concern17:20
lhindss/changes/changing17:20
michaelxinccneill: I talked with Homer. They are very concerned.17:20
dg____HPE will probably cut us back. Mostly due to the 'security leaves openstack' headlines17:20
dg____of course, HPE might cut us anyway :)17:21
sigmavirushyakuhei: okay, so you're the first person to have a concern other than funding17:21
hyakuheiouch.17:21
elmikoi like hyakuhei's statement about upping our game, that seems like an excellent course if we can follow it17:21
tmcpeakshould we ignore the funding component?17:21
tmcpeakseems like a big deal to gloss over17:21
hyakuheisigmavirus I don't think that's true but I have probably been the most vocal17:21
ccneillhyakuhei: I agree - I don't want it to be about funding, but it is a reality. I think though that we can look at it as a positive opportunity to really grow into the Project title rather than "giving up" so to speak and reverting to WG17:21
hyakuhei+117:22
tmcpeakccneill: +117:22
dg____+117:22
hyakuheiThat's exactly what I want17:22
lhinds+117:22
hyakuheiHence the long rambling blog post17:22
hyakuheiOh, I also want Gmail to support special characters in filters.17:22
sigmavirustmcpeak: I'm not saying it's unimportant, I'm saying that before hyakuhei's blog post no one had anything to argue in favor of a PTL besides "They organize our events for us and being in the big tent gives us funding"17:22
elmikoturn into the headwind, eh?17:22
DavieyBeing 'downgraded' to a WG to me, is making a statement that security isn't a first priority of OpenStack17:22
tmcpeakPTL has nothing to do with it.  The question is are we a big-tent project17:22
dg____+117:22
dhellmannaside from the fact that the vmt is folded into this team, would anyone object to it being called "security tools" rather than "security"? Does that adequately capture the nature of the work being done?17:23
greenhorn@hyakuhei +117:23
dg____no17:23
tmcpeakdhellmann: not at all17:23
tkelseyif the OSSP leaves the big tent how will that impact bandit/anchor/etc17:23
hyakuheidhellmann maybe 50% of what we do17:23
sigmavirusDaviey: so then you think the API design, architecture, and performance working groups aren't important to OpenStack because they're working groups?17:23
tkelseywill they need to re-enter as their own thing each?17:23
lhindsdhellmann: we do more then tooling though, I don't agree with that myself17:23
ccneillwhoa tkelsey in the house :)17:23
tmcpeakwe own the security guide, security notes, sec-core (advice for security on embargoed issues)17:23
tkelseyccneill: hi :)17:23
dg____dhellman for example: http://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/17:23
*** beslemon has quit IRC17:23
hyakuheidhellmann we have a decent infographic here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security17:23
tmcpeaksecure development guidelines17:23
dhellmannok, it sounds like a name change is too narrowly focused, thanks for clarifying that17:23
hyakuheiBasically tooling as a thing we do isn't the big priority17:23
dg____dhellman theres also this: http://security.openstack.org17:24
michaelxinBy moving to WG for security project might conflict with the goal of getting Openstack Enterprise ready (security is a big part).17:24
elmikosigmavirus: if attendence is any metric, api-wg is not seen as important... =(17:24
Davieysigmavirus: No.. that isnn't quite what i mean... but those are not primary deliverable17:24
hyakuheiand we need to update that with Syntribos, now that Secure API testing has a proper name17:24
unrahul+117:24
*** goldenfri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
hyakuhei#action hyakuhei to update the Security wiki image to give Syntribos their due place17:24
greenhornfurthermore an argument*could* be made that if security leaves ghe bigtestnt, it portrays a message we might not want to send ('security was kicked out' = not so great msg)17:25
sigmavirusmichaelxin: unsurprisingly (to me) OSIC needs serious education about how OpenStack works, but that's for another channel and another discussion17:25
dhellmannI really don't understand the distinction being made between a project team and a working group then. If the point of the team is not to deliver a product, but to deliver advice, etc., then a chartered working group seems just as good a fit.17:25
hyakuheiWe do both17:25
michaelxinsigmavirus: +117:25
dhellmanngreenhorn : you wouldn't be "leaving" though, just having a status change17:25
hyakuheiIn pretty much equal parts17:25
tmcpeakwe deliver lots of products17:25
dhellmannis there anyone on the team who is only an atc because of contributions to this team?17:25
lhindswe have three development projects putting in around 20-30 patches a day17:25
tmcpeako/17:25
sicarieo/17:26
sigmavirusdhellmann: certainly there are17:26
unrahulo/17:26
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
mdongo/17:26
vinaypotlurio/17:26
tmcpeakactually no, that's not true.  I contribute to security to other projects (such as Bandit gates)17:26
dhellmannok, that's good information to have, too17:26
tkelseyo/17:26
lhindso/17:26
michaelxino/17:26
mdongI know all of us OSIC members certainly are17:26
knangiao/17:26
ccneilldhellmann: think of our advice as "this is good" and our tools as "hopefully this will make it even better." we can't have the tools without people with the expertise to give the advice, but we can't have the level of contributions if some people can't work on it in a full-time way (i.e. on an on-going product development or other effort)17:26
hyakuheio/ (96% sure that's correct for the last cycle)17:26
tkelseyactually no, i have others as well17:26
dg____i think there definitely are some of us who are only ATC because of this project17:26
ccneillo/17:26
hyakuheiccneill I like that17:26
hyakuheiWell put sir17:26
Davieybut those people who are ATC just because of OSSP, could get ATC if the projects were themselevs projects17:26
DavieySuch as OSSN becoming a project itself17:27
elmikoat some point, wasn't the security guide an actual product that this group produced?17:27
hyakuheiMost aren't big enough to stand on their own17:27
dg____daviey yup17:27
tmcpeakDaviey: but then we need tons of PTLs instead17:27
tkelseyso we would swap one project for many small ones, and multiply the admin overhead17:27
hyakuheiWe're good at self managing these things at the moment (election and ML aside)17:27
michaelxinhyakuhei: +117:27
tkelseynot great IMHO17:27
*** dtardivel has quit IRC17:27
dhellmannyeah, I'm not sure that the best outcome is to turn each repo into its own team17:27
sigmavirusaren't some of the doc-related things co-owned by the documentation team?17:27
dg____Daviey - if we cant manage to elect a PTL for OSSP, could we get one for Anchor, Bandit, OSSN, Security Doc.....17:27
Davieytmcpeak: well.. one PTL could cover them all17:27
Daviey(I don't agree with it, but i am suggesting it)17:27
dg____like a security PTL?17:27
* greenhorn wishes IRC was threaded17:27
Davieyhah17:27
dhellmannthat sounds quite a bit like what you have now :-)17:28
Davieydhellmann: and it kinda works :)17:28
ccneillwith more overhead, it sounds like17:28
dhellmannDaviey : mostly :-)17:28
dg____so it seems like switching to a WG is going to have a bunch of negative effects, without adding much benefit17:28
Davieysomewhat17:28
hyakuheidg____ that's my feeling at the moment.17:28
michaelxinI do not think that we have enough people to do it.17:28
elmikosigmavirus: i think you may be right about that17:28
tmcpeakI think we're just pushing around beans here.  We have a bunch of projects that we think benefit from having a PTL.  Whether those are under one project or a bunch of different projects doesn't matter17:29
dhellmannso it sounds like folks want to stay a big tent team, and that there's some recognition that there are expectations from outside the team to maintain that status17:29
michaelxinWe have been struggling with growing team for a while.17:29
tmcpeakdhellmann: yes17:29
dg____by switching to a WG we get a bunch of extra admin for our existing projects, probably reduce funding and resource, generate negative publicity17:29
dhellmanntmcpeak : sort of. we want to find a stable state where the team is actually working together and not just lumped under a title because of pattern matching17:29
dg____we work together quite well17:29
sigmavirusdg____: all publicity is good publicity, or so I'm told17:29
greenhorneh17:29
greenhorntell that to snowden. ; )17:30
hyakuheidhellmann I think that's fair. We're certainly willing to revisit it and I'm going to be accountable for us delivering on the things we should be doing from a project point of view17:30
michaelxinsigmavirus: +117:30
dg____sigmavirus 'openstack abandons security'17:30
ccneilldhellmann: from your perspective, do the goals outlined in hyakuhei's post get us closer to being like other projects?17:30
Davieydhellmann: To change tack slightly... what would the benefits be of switching to a WG?17:30
*** thomnico_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
dhellmannccneill : I've been talking here, not reading, but I will look it over17:30
sigmavirusdg____: and if people can't see past BuzzFeed's headlines, I feel sorry for them17:30
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
elmikosigmavirus: that's a lot of feels to go around ;P17:31
dhellmannDaviey : from one perspective it means a bit less management overhead for the team itself, although that's not really a prime reason17:31
sigmavirusccneill: I feel more comfortable with having a PTL if those goals are actually project goals17:31
dg____sigmavirus i was actually thinking of the register17:31
hyakuheiThe short version is deliver on the things in the project team guide with a big focus on the mailing list / open communications principle17:31
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
sigmavirushyakuhei: frankly, there was enough negative feedback about the mailing list *on the mailing list* that I don't think you're providing yourself an attainable goal with that one17:32
tmcpeakI'll be the first to say, I hate the mailing list17:32
dhellmannDaviey : as I said to start, my motivation is to help the team decide what structure works for it, and then have that reflected correctly in the governance setup to avoid existential questions in the future17:32
tmcpeakmy security filter flags a bunch of stuff that isn't related to my project17:32
hyakuheiYe of little faith. Most of what we have done re: midcycle, electing cores etc has been conducted on the ML17:32
tmcpeakwe might be able to fix that by changing our tag to something specific to us "OSSP"17:32
sigmavirusThe overall attitude yesterday on that thread and in #openstack-security was "The mailing list contains no useful information for us and it's not my job to occasionally scan it for something that might be of import"17:32
Davieydhellmann: Right, i get that.. but i wanted to understand any potential benefits of switching17:32
hyakuheisigmavirus the bigger issue was really us not reading it as well as we should.17:33
tmcpeakso I don't have to read about neutron security groups, etc17:33
dg____sigmavirus disagree, it has useful information but it is lost in the noise17:33
tmcpeakTONS of noise17:33
sigmavirushyakuhei: there's overwhelming sentiment that the mailing list provide no value to this group yesterday17:33
dhellmannDaviey : I don't think there are significant benefits beyond not dealing with elections (which is also not that significant, imho)17:33
elmikosigmavirus: ouch, that's sad =(17:33
ccneillsigmavirus: as one of the people relaying that sentiment, I will commit to reading the mailing list if that's really the thing that's holding our group back17:33
Davieysigmavirus: The mailing list is read... the thread that kicked this off was noticed and discussed within minutes of it being sent17:33
sigmavirustmcpeak: so the attitude that [security] gets more traffic than you think it should is worrisome to me17:34
dhellmanntmcpeak : a tag change might make a lot of sense17:34
dg____sigmavirus disagree, the sentiment is that stuff gets lost in noise.17:34
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
ccneill¯\_(ツ)_/¯17:34
hyakuheisigmavirus as a read operation, currently that's true. but as dhellmann pointed out many people don't really know what we've been doing. I think that as we improve things in that area, relevant ML traffic will increase17:34
tmcpeaksigmavirus: no, [security] is fine17:34
michaelxinwe should change our attitude for mail list.17:34
dhellmannhyakuhei : ++17:34
tmcpeak"security" isn't, and that's how my gmail filter works17:34
sigmavirustmcpeak: ah, I see17:34
dhellmannyeah, I think gmail filters drop punctuation17:34
dg____hyakuhei clearly not enough people know what we do, as evidenced by dhellman not knowing what we do...17:34
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
*** Leo_ has quit IRC17:34
dg____thats something we have to fix17:34
elmikodg____++17:35
hyakuheidg____ for sure.17:35
dhellmannfwiw, we had similar complaints about using the "release" tag for both release announcements and release team discussions, so we changed to "new" for announcements17:35
tkelseydg____: ++17:35
lhindsI intend to ramp up participation on the list, and have filters set up. So its fine for me17:35
lhinds-dev that is17:35
tmcpeakshould we change our tag to [OSSP]?17:35
tmcpeakthat might help17:35
dhellmanndg____ : I apologize for not doing my homework before the meeting. :-)17:35
*** thomnico_ has quit IRC17:35
hyakuheiThat will (ironically) change soon as we start integrating TA with the VMT so basically all new teams will know about us and any going for vulnerability managed would too17:35
tmcpeaknot likely to see OSSP false positives17:35
Davieytmcpeak: doesn't roll off the tongue so much17:35
sigmavirustmcpeak: that would help for intra-project discussion (if we consider the security team a project, which I think we all do)17:35
dg____dhellman as much a reflection on our community integration as yours17:36
lhinds'security' is certainly to wide a net as a filter17:36
ccneillsigmavirus: +117:36
tmcpeakif email wasn't painful I'd definitely like to start using it more17:36
tmcpeakhelpful for synching with others in different TZ, etc17:36
ccneilleveryone can commit to reading internal mailing list, but not the whole OS list17:36
*** beslemon has quit IRC17:36
sigmavirustmcpeak: email is one of the worst possibly designed communication systems but it's what we have17:36
hyakuheiI think the problem is that people tend to use [Security] as a tag that they want some sort of ethereal security body to add stuff to a thread17:36
tmcpeakwell we've decided to prefer IRC as a project17:36
dhellmannfor those of you not on gmail, you might find https://doughellmann.com/blog/2015/03/17/handling-high-email-volume-with-sup/ useful17:36
hyakuheimore of a meta-tag than looking for us as a specific body.17:36
sigmavirusccneill: right, I do think we're missing discussions though where we could be gaining visibility and new contributors by not looking for those opportunities on the list though17:37
michaelxindhellmann: Thanks.17:37
DavieySo, you could subscribe twice to the mailing list.. with one of them using email+security@gmail.com and subscribe to just the [SECURITY] tag. Then you can special case it easily enough as you have a unique TO address?17:37
dg____dhellmann thanks17:37
*** ccneill_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** ccneill has quit IRC17:37
*** ccneill_ is now known as ccneill17:37
lhinds[openstack-sec]17:37
mvaldesso have we decided that we want to do what is necessary to remain a big-tent project?17:38
hyakuheiSo I think the tag issue is relevant but probably something we don't have to decide right now17:38
tmcpeakmvaldes: I think so17:38
*** HeOS has quit IRC17:38
mvaldesand moved on to "how we improve as a big-tent project"17:38
tmcpeakis anybody NOT in favor of security remaining a project?17:38
lhindsmvaldes +117:38
hyakuheiI'd like to come back to "Are we staying in the big-tent for now" and "Who will be PTL"17:38
*** neilus has quit IRC17:38
tmcpeakhyakuhei: +117:38
hyakuheimvaldes I think you're right but I'd like us to be explicit about it17:38
mvaldesdo we need a discussion of "how do we appeal to the community that we remain a big—tent project"17:39
sigmavirushyakuhei: I'd advocate for a formal vote for the first question17:39
*** Nikolay_St has quit IRC17:39
hyakuheiif we're ready to, lets vote17:39
michaelxinIf none ha additional question, we can vote.17:39
*** mkoderer has quit IRC17:39
dg____before we vote, did i miss the bit where we covered advantages to going to WG?17:39
sigmavirus"#startvote Do the project members want to continue to be part of the Big Tent?" I think might work17:39
sigmavirusdg____: no one's discussed it really17:39
Davieyhmm.. I think it is largely been agreed by most people inside and outside ossp that it remains big tent.  Not sure we need more than just a quick vote here?17:39
*** pradk has quit IRC17:39
sigmavirusdg____: one advantage is no one having to watch for PTL nominations17:39
hyakuheiDaviey +117:40
dg____sigmavirus :)17:40
tmcpeakquick vote should work17:40
mvaldes-_-17:40
sigmavirusdg____: I'm glad you appreciate my humor ;)17:40
ccneillso no real advantages17:40
tmcpeak#startvote Do the project members want to continue to be part of the Big Tent?17:40
openstackBegin voting on: Do the project members want to continue to be part of the Big Tent? Valid vote options are Yes, No.17:40
michaelxinccneill: +117:40
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.17:40
tmcpeak#vote Yes17:40
sigmavirus#vote Yes17:40
lhinds#vote Yes17:40
ccneill#vote Yes17:40
mdong#vote yes17:40
hyakuhei#vote Yes17:40
elmiko#vote Yes17:41
unrahul#vote Yes17:41
sicarie#vote yes17:41
dg____#vote Yes17:41
Daviey#vote Yes17:41
mvaldes#vote Yes17:41
michaelxin#vote Yes17:41
knangia#vote yes17:41
greenhorn#vote yes17:41
vinaypotluri#vote yes17:41
browne#vote yes17:41
tmcpeakallright17:41
tkelsey#vote yes17:41
tmcpeaklooks pretty conclusive :D17:41
sigmavirusare we missing anyone?17:42
ccneill18 yays17:42
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
tmcpeakending vote in 1 min17:42
dg____dhellman ?17:42
* Daviey waits for 19 no's17:42
tmcpeak#endvote17:42
openstackVoted on "Do the project members want to continue to be part of the Big Tent?" Results are17:42
dhellmanndg____ : oh, I wasn't going to vote, I'm not a part of the team. I'm just here to advise.17:42
sigmavirusDaviey: i can probably whip up some IRC bots for you :P17:42
ccneillaw come on openstack you're leaving me hanging! WHO WINS?!17:42
michaelxinhaha17:43
tmcpeakok now PTL17:43
sigmavirusccneill: NO ONE17:43
sigmavirus;P17:43
tmcpeakwho is interested?17:43
ccneill:((((((((17:43
ccneillDonald J Trump17:43
sigmavirusccneill: too soon17:43
ccneillsorry, strike that from the record17:43
lhindsvote is rigged!17:43
elmikoi really don't trust a 100% consensus, really needed a no in there to keep us honest17:43
sigmavirus(also it's drumpf)17:43
lhindsall bots17:43
hyakuheiheh17:43
DavieyI think most people assumed hyakuhei would stand again... did he want to do it?17:43
tkelseymy bot is laggy :P17:43
sigmaviruselmiko: hyakuhei's blog post convinced me of Yes this morning before the meeting17:43
michaelxinDaviey: +117:43
sigmavirusDaviey: judging by said post, he does17:43
tmcpeakyeah, hyakuhei do you want to continue doing it?17:43
hyakuheiI'd quite like to17:43
elmikosigmavirus: nice, well that's an "almost no"17:44
sigmavirus(I think it's in one of the last paragraphs)17:44
hyakuheilol17:44
lhindshyakuhei +117:44
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
tmcpeakcool, anybody else?17:44
dg____I would nominate hyakuhei for this period, while we try and fix ourselves17:44
Davieysigmavirus: (just trying to be explicit)17:44
tkelseydg____: +117:44
ccneilldg____: seconded17:44
dg____then seriously look at succession planning next time?17:44
hyakuheidg____ +117:44
elmikoagreed, hyakuhei ++17:44
dg____ideally with someone who remembers we need a ptl :P17:44
DavieyIt would probably be an idea of having a *goal* of having at least PTL nominations next cycle17:44
elmikodg____: lol, BURN!17:45
Daviey(3 PTL nominations)17:45
sigmavirusdg____: that's might be too much to ask17:45
ccneillcan we add a notification to openstack-bot? :)17:45
greenhornDeez +1 ; )17:45
sicarieDoes Lotus Notes have a calendar function?17:45
ccneillI think we established that our IRC attendance is better than our ML participation17:45
dg____daviey that is a good point. we should have 3 suitable candidates17:45
hyakuheiDaviey +117:45
tkelseydg____: Daviey +117:45
sigmavirusdg____: Daviey curious about 3 being the magic number17:45
Davieysigmavirus: I just plucked it17:45
hyakuheidhellmann what are the next steps for us from a TC/organizational point of view?17:46
*** pvaneck has quit IRC17:46
DavieyI think captn0day had aspirations17:46
dhellmannDaviey : it would be good to have some other folks thinking about rotating the responsibilities, but it's not a requirement that there be an election. if only one team member is able to commit to being PTL, that's OK.17:46
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
greenhornyou're thinking cluster quorum maybe17:46
tmcpeakDaviey: +++++17:46
dg____given the diversity of the areas we look at, 3 doesnt seem unreasonable17:46
sicarielooool17:46
michaelxinSo, we control our fate or not?17:46
sigmavirustmcpeak: should run to make bandit great again ;)17:46
tmcpeaklol17:47
dhellmannhyakuhei : I think you've already been talking with ttx? I would make sure that he and the rest of the TC is aware that you're ready to serve, the team is going to work on the communication stuff to avoid the situation in the future, and then get it on the TC agenda for next week.17:47
sigmavirusmichaelxin: I think hyakuhei and a couple of us should attend the TC meeting on Tuesday17:47
dhellmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee17:47
dg____ty17:47
tmcpeakmy support is behind hyakuhei :)17:47
Davieydhellmann: Does this mean that the recommendation to the TC will be that hyakuhei is appointed PTL for this cycle?17:47
dhellmannthere's already an item there about "Decide future of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams"17:47
tmcpeakI'll help with the administrative crap though17:47
*** pvaneck has quit IRC17:47
sigmavirustmcpeak: right, I'm also willing to help if hyakuhei needs it17:48
michaelxinSo, the decision will be next Tuesday?17:48
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC17:48
hyakuheiThanks sigmavirus tmcpeak17:48
sigmavirusI just have no way of getting a commitment from my organization to be PTL17:48
dhellmannDaviey : I don't want to speak for anyone else. I support that position. I think there's a strong likelihood that others will too.17:48
sigmavirus(And I don't want to be PTL either)17:48
Davieydhellmann: super, thanks17:48
tmcpeakI think fungi mentioned being interested?17:48
michaelxindhellmann: Thanks.17:48
hyakuheiJust another week of waiting to hear my fate ;)17:48
Davieyhyakuhei: 12 mins left.. might be a good idea to smash through the agenda?17:49
Davieyerr tmcpeak17:49
michaelxinDo we need support from other TC members?17:49
tmcpeakok, anything else we need on this?17:49
dg____dhellmann are you likely to be able to help in future (assuming we dont get thrown out) while we figure out how to be better engaged with the community?17:49
michaelxinOSIC offered to help if needed.17:49
greenhornugh meeting - gtg. fun meeting eveyrone17:49
hyakuheithanks greenhorn17:49
tmcpeakthanks greenhorn17:49
*** byrdog55 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
tmcpeak#topic dg for sec core17:49
*** openstack changes topic to "dg for sec core (Meeting topic: Security)"17:49
dhellmanndg____ : I can offer some advice, but we might also be able to find another TC member who can be more active with you.17:49
tmcpeakwe actually DID use the ML for this, didn't we17:49
*** greenhorn has quit IRC17:50
dg____dhellmann excellent, thanks17:50
dhellmannthanks for including me folks. I appreciate the constructive discussion on what I know is a frustrating situation.17:50
fungitmcpeak: no, i was merely bemoaning the fact that i'm not able to find time to get involved enough in other things the security team works on to feel comfortable being ptl (not to mention, i'm already ptl of one of the most active teams in the community, so lack much free time)17:50
hyakuheiThis was sent out on the ML (hah!) and we had a response from fungi with a +117:50
tmcpeakthanks dhellmann, appreciate your help sorting it out17:50
tmcpeakfungi: gotcha17:50
hyakuheithanks dhellmann you've been a good help here17:50
hyakuheis/good/big17:50
hyakuhei... long day.17:50
lhindsthx dhellmann17:50
ccneilldhellmann: thanks for coming. this discussion was definitely needed17:50
Davieythanks dhellmann17:50
michaelxindhellmann: Thanks.17:50
tmcpeakallright, so dg17:51
tmcpeakwhere did we get17:51
tmcpeakI think we're all happy, any push back from the ML post?17:51
tmcpeakI saw fungi agreed17:51
hyakuheiYeah, we're good to go. There's a space there.17:51
tmcpeakalso hyakuhei did you speak with nkinder?17:52
tmcpeakI'd love his continued input but know he's swamped17:52
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
hyakuheiYes soryr17:53
hyakuheiheh17:53
hyakuheiNkinder is stepping down from coresec17:53
hyakuheiDoug gets his shoes.17:53
hyakuheiIf everyone agrees17:53
tmcpeakok, so with dg we have 4 active members able to assess security impact for embargoed issues?17:53
michaelxinwho are the 4 ?17:54
tmcpeakhyakuhei, dg, lhinds, and me17:54
michaelxinnice17:54
fungithem's some big shoes. nkinder is awesome17:54
michaelxinThanks.17:54
tmcpeakfungi: +117:54
tmcpeakgreat, seems like we're good there17:55
tmcpeak#topic Syntribos17:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Syntribos (Meeting topic: Security)"17:55
hyakuheifungi +117:55
tmcpeakccneill, unrahul: you're up17:55
elmikofungi: agreed, nkinder++17:55
ccneillso we're testing Nova right now17:55
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
ccneillwrapped up testing Glance earlier this week17:55
ccneillfound one potential issue in Glance that's still embargoed17:55
dg____awesome, thanks guys. sad nkinder had to step down thou :(17:55
ccneillnext week we test Cinder/Swift17:55
tmcpeakccneill: sick!17:55
ccneillso that's the news on the testing front17:55
tmcpeakccneill: you guys should write an ML post about this17:56
Davieyccneill: How many compute hours does a scan take?17:56
ccneilltmcpeak: agreed, we'll come up with a summary17:56
*** banix has quit IRC17:56
tmcpeakgreat17:56
ccneillDaviey: depends on the project under test, and the number of endpoints17:56
Davieyccneill: with the ones you have done so far?17:56
ccneillDaviey: in the ballpark of an hour to 3 at this point :X17:56
fungiyeah, we've (vmt) seen a few good reports come in from the syntribos team already, so glad it's picking up steam. thanks!17:56
Davieywow, that is much quicker than i anticipated17:56
ccneillso, in terms of "lessons learned" from this round of testing17:56
ccneillfungi: :) thanks, we'll keep trying to find fun stuff17:57
ccneill- we need to work on performance where we can get it17:57
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
ccneillwe currently use unittest, and I'm convinced that we can streamline things with a queue and workers to significantly improve performance there17:57
tmcpeakawesome, anything else for syntribos?17:57
tmcpeak2 mins17:58
tmcpeakwe're not going to get through the agenda today17:58
ccneilllast thing: we will hopefully have a new version up on pip soon :)17:58
fungiccneill: any parallelism (like we get with testr in other openstack projects)?17:58
unrahul:) +1 ccneill17:58
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
ccneillfungi: we're planning to explore it once we finish this first round of testing17:58
ccneillbut no parallelism built in at the moment17:58
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
fungicool, that's definitely one place i'd consider looking for performance improvements17:59
dg____before we wrap up, please can I beg reviews of this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357978/517:59
tmcpeakallright guys, we've got to wrap17:59
fungithough you need your tests quantized into non-interdependent units for parallelism to really be viable17:59
hyakuheidg____ already has my +218:00
dg____tmcpeak lhinds redrobot ^^18:00
ccneillfungi: yep, none of our tests are interdependent thankfully18:00
lhindsdg____: +218:00
tmcpeakdg____: sire18:00
tmcpeak#endmeeting18:00
dg____thanks guys18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:00
redroboteh, sorry, I haven't had time to review :(18:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 18:00:20 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
tmcpeakthanks everybody18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-09-22-17.00.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-09-22-17.00.txt18:00
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-09-22-17.00.log.html18:00
elmikothanks hyakuhei tmcpeak !18:00
elmikogood luck =)18:00
hyakuheithanks all!18:00
*** beslemon has quit IRC18:00
*** elmiko has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
Davieythanks tmcpeak18:00
ccneillo/ thanks guys18:00
tmcpeakthanks all!18:01
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** sicarie has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** mvaldes has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** tkelsey has quit IRC18:01
*** dg____ has quit IRC18:02
*** ansmith has quit IRC18:02
*** dasanind has quit IRC18:03
*** rmart04 has quit IRC18:04
*** gyee has quit IRC18:04
*** beslemon has quit IRC18:05
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC18:05
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** ccneill has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC18:08
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC18:09
*** dustins has quit IRC18:09
*** mdong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** dane_leblanc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** mdong has quit IRC18:12
*** mdong_ is now known as mdong18:12
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** myoung|biab is now known as myoung18:13
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]18:14
*** rmart04 has quit IRC18:14
*** banix has quit IRC18:14
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC18:15
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:15
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** iyamahat has quit IRC18:18
*** beslemon has quit IRC18:20
*** piet has quit IRC18:20
*** tgtanya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
*** prateek has quit IRC18:20
*** tgtanya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
*** Nikolay_St has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
*** ayoung has quit IRC18:25
*** mars_toktonaliev has quit IRC18:25
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
*** lpetrut has quit IRC18:30
*** Nikolay_St has quit IRC18:30
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC18:32
*** tgtanya_ has quit IRC18:33
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC18:37
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** coolsvap has quit IRC18:42
*** michaelxin has quit IRC18:43
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly18:44
*** baoli has quit IRC18:44
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk18:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** Leo_ has quit IRC18:45
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** kfarr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:50
*** tgtanya has quit IRC18:50
*** baoli has quit IRC18:50
*** tgtanya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** ansmith has quit IRC18:53
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** absubram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** rustyl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
SpamapS#startmeeting arch_wg19:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Sep 22 19:02:18 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SpamapS. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"19:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'arch_wg'19:02
nikhilo/19:02
rustylo/19:02
*** KrishR has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
SpamapS#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Arch-WG#Agenda19:02
rosmaitao/19:02
SpamapSCourtesy ping for arch_wg: nikhil, harlowja, dstanek19:03
KrishRo/19:03
harlowjaoh hi, brb, getting food before19:03
kragnizo/19:03
*** absubram has quit IRC19:03
SpamapSwelcome welcome all19:03
*** banix has quit IRC19:03
SpamapSdtroyer said he'd join us late19:03
nikhilreminder: the courtesy ping list on the wiki can be updated for those who need highlight reminders for this meeting19:03
SpamapSpresumably because he's double-booked on odd weeks19:03
*** dtroyer_zz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
cdento/ I managed to show up for once19:04
SpamapScdent: huzzah!19:04
dtroyer_zzo/19:04
SpamapSdtroyer_zz: woot19:04
SpamapS#topic previous meeting action items19:04
*** openstack changes topic to "previous meeting action items (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"19:04
*** byrdog55_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** byrdog55 has quit IRC19:04
*** byrdog55_ is now known as byrdog5519:04
SpamapS#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/19:04
SpamapSa moment while I scrape them out19:04
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
SpamapSSpamapS fix the agenda cargo cult fail to not say api_wg19:05
SpamapSdone19:05
SpamapSSpamapS find an APAC friendly slot in the odd weeks.19:05
SpamapSI have not done this yet. Apologies for that. Since next week is the even week, I hope to have one to propose then so in two weeks we'll have one in an APAC friendly slot19:06
harlowjawoah cdent who are u19:06
SpamapS#action SpamapS find an APAC friendly slot in the odd weeks. [carried over]19:06
cdentharlowja: ikr!19:06
*** rocky_g has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
*** absubram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
SpamapSharlowja: I hear he's nothing but trouble19:06
SpamapSeveryone please review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/arch-wg-draft to ensure it matches the spirit of https://review.openstack.org/33514119:06
woodster_o/19:06
rocky_go/19:06
rocky_gdang.  Whaddi miss?19:07
SpamapSrocky_g: not much19:07
harlowjaha19:07
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
SpamapSThis last action item is really just a reminder to look and help edit that etherpad so we can land it in the repo whenever I finally get around to creating the repo.19:07
SpamapSSpamapS create architecture-wg-repo19:07
SpamapSI was a total slacker this week and did not do any of that. Before I carry it over, did anyone else want to pick that up?19:08
rustylWhat time of day for APAC were you considering... where is everyone joining from?19:08
* rocky_g takes one step back19:08
nikhilSpamapS: you're mising #action prefix to your action items :)19:09
nikhilslick19:09
nikhilrustyl: I think we will need a doodle and/or review for that. it depends on the availability of the slot too.19:10
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]19:10
SpamapSrustyl: we have had at least 2 requests for a time that fits for APAC architecture WG participants, which is enough for me.19:10
SpamapSnikhil: I'm not adding new actions, I'm reviewing old ones.19:10
*** mfedosin has quit IRC19:10
SpamapSbut, to the point, I think they deserve a * prefix19:11
nikhilSpamapS: I can create the repo19:11
SpamapSnikhil: sweet19:11
SpamapSone less thing19:11
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
SpamapS#action nikhil Create architecture-wg git repository for proposals and general WG documentation.19:11
*** daemontool has quit IRC19:12
SpamapSnikhil: I believe there's some guidance in dtroyer's email from this past week.19:12
SpamapS* dtroyer_zz Add write-up of backlog procedures to etherpad and send to ML for discussion19:12
SpamapSI believe that got done19:13
nikhilawesome19:13
SpamapS#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/104144.html19:13
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
SpamapSPlease everybody find that in your inboxes and respond with any feedback. I think the text of that email should probably go in as one of our first documents in the repo19:13
SpamapSand a block of actions now:19:14
SpamapSSpamapS make dtroyer harlowja ttx Rockyg initial cores of architecture-wg repo19:14
SpamapSSpamapS get the arch-core rings ordered19:14
SpamapSSpamapS add nikhil to initial cores as well19:14
SpamapSnikhil: I think we can just fold that all into the repo creation.19:14
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:14
SpamapSas implementation details19:14
*** ayoung has quit IRC19:14
dtroyer_zzSpamapS: that email is a summary of the etherpad, that is what I think should go into the repo19:15
* dtroyer_zz is behind19:15
SpamapSdtroyer_zz: good point. :)19:15
SpamapSDid we miss any action items from last week?19:15
harlowjaSpamapS did u get them ordered19:15
harlowjaplatinum right19:15
nikhilSpamapS: ack on folding that into the repo19:16
SpamapSharlowja: oh, yes, Rose Gold with Hematite faux pearls.19:16
harlowjafaux?19:16
rocky_ggold?19:16
nikhilrose?19:16
nikhillol19:16
harlowjaah. at least we all got our sense of humor still :)19:16
SpamapS#action all BE SERIOUS THIS IS ARCHITECTURE ;)19:17
* rocky_g puts the cheetos down19:17
SpamapSOk so I'm going to skip the next few topics19:18
SpamapSbecause they're all basically hinged on having a repo and proposals to discuss19:18
harlowjakk19:18
SpamapSwe can loop back around for the proposal discussion at the end, but we have some other business I want to make sure we don't miss19:18
* cdent takes the cheetos19:18
harlowja?19:18
*** greenhorn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
SpamapS#topic Summit Cross-Project Space Request19:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit Cross-Project Space Request (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"19:18
SpamapS#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-cross-project-sessions19:18
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
*** daemontool has quit IRC19:19
rocky_g++19:19
SpamapSI really think we need that space in the cross-project fishbowls19:19
harlowjai'd like it19:19
SpamapSI know most of you, but I'd like to make sure we have a chance to introduce ourselves to the rest of OpenStack as a group19:19
harlowjahi i'm josh19:20
SpamapSno you're not19:20
harlowjahi i'm not josh19:20
SpamapSyes you are19:20
harlowja:(19:20
SpamapSSo, anyway, please review the text in that etherpad before October 119:20
harlowjais there anyway we can split some of those proposals into categories?19:20
SpamapSIf you want to improve it, either just do it there, or we can discuss here.19:21
harlowjalike [tech-debt, future-thinking...]19:21
harlowjalike python3.x is tech-debt19:21
SpamapSharlowja: I think that's worthwhile metadata that we can use to make sure we're spending adequate time on each area we want to.19:21
harlowjak, i mean nothing wrong with tech-debt (it will always exist)19:21
SpamapSharlowja: also, I believe the deciders on that list are the TC, so we can also make sure to influence the TC on the overall makeup of these at the TC meeting19:22
harlowjakk19:23
rocky_gI think we can also vote, but just as a popularity thing, not like the TCV19:23
SpamapSI actually really dislike voting as a consensus mechanism.19:23
harlowjawhats TCV?19:23
rocky_goops.  I was wrong.  Only TC19:23
harlowjakk19:23
SpamapSYeah, TC will be deciding on this list. I think they're trying to rank them by value.19:24
rocky_gharlowja, TCV==fat fingers19:24
*** jprovazn has quit IRC19:24
harlowjawe have a new TC composed of fat fingers19:24
harlowjanice19:24
SpamapSoh, TCV is fat fingers? I definitely have that.19:24
harlowja(and this is how crazy rumors start, lol)19:24
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC19:24
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
SpamapSSo, I'm pausing a bit so everyone can read through the list there19:25
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
SpamapSWe'll move on to other business in a minute. Please take that minute now to read the text that is there for our fishbowl session, and then just comment here if you think it should be discussed.19:26
cdentblurb++19:26
SpamapSNote that I think we could also propose to split a session with the PWG because we're kind of two sides of the same coin (they're more about what end users see at the high level, we're more about what developers work on at a high level)19:27
*** mdong has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
SpamapSBut I'd rather have the 40 minutes to work through proposals face to face.19:27
SpamapSOk, let's move on.19:28
SpamapS#topic Proposals for work19:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Proposals for work (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"19:28
SpamapSwe don't have a proposals repo yet, but we do still have 2 things on the agenda if anybody wants to chat about them.19:28
rocky_gWe should go for a working session with PWG19:28
harlowjajust a quick question, on the proposals for work, do we want to set expectations for these?19:29
harlowjafor example, its pretty easy to through out random ideas19:29
dtroyer_zzthat is one of the reasons for asking for a background doc19:29
harlowjabut its the real hard work of actually doing it and doing it in a way that involves others that i think is where snags happy19:29
harlowja*happen19:30
SpamapS#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/arch-wg-draft19:30
rustylthe first item we work on should be easy to allow the process to tested19:30
harlowjadtroyer_zz k, that would be useful19:30
SpamapSharlowja: this has a "How to contribute" section19:30
dtroyer_zzto raise the bar a bit and get people on the same page of what exactly is being proposed19:30
*** zigo_ is now known as zigo19:30
dtroyer_zzrustyl: exactly19:30
harlowjadtroyer_zz gotcha, also a 'outreach section?'19:30
SpamapSwhich basically sets the expectations19:30
harlowjak19:30
dtroyer_zzI think things in that proposal list without a name attached will have a hard time getting int the repo :)19:31
SpamapSrustyl: I agree. I think ttx's base services one is a good candidate for that. Because documenting the current situation will be relatively simple (All OpenStack projects can already expect to have wsgi servers to run their code, a SQL database, and a MQ) and then we can build toward what we'd like to add to that (mostly, a DLM fronted by tooz)19:32
SpamapSwe might also want to add memcached19:33
SpamapSsince most projects end up using it19:33
dtroyer_zzttx's proposal was actually at the OpenStack services level, ie Barbican, but the DLM ins another one to consider19:33
SpamapSright, Keystone is also on the list.19:33
SpamapSBarbican.........19:33
dtroyer_zzah, there are two lines in that list, so yeah19:33
harlowjaDLM is an interesting one, because i also feel there is education that we may also need to help out with also19:33
harlowjalike most of these (systems) are more than just locks19:34
dtroyer_zzand the information on stuff like that is one of the value-adds I think this team can/should provide19:34
harlowjalocks are just one 'by-product' of the underlying consensus stuff happening inside them19:34
* harlowja just saying19:35
SpamapSharlowja: right, the thing is, even with Cinder landing their use of tooz, we want to be able to confidently go around to each project and add DLM dependencies without having to go through the same "but no some people won't have a DLM" discussion.19:35
harlowjaright, there is more of a spectrum is all i'm saying19:36
harlowjaDLM is imho like the start of that spectrum19:36
harlowja(spectrum of consensus like systems and using them)19:36
rocky_galso goes to scaling.19:36
SpamapSYeah, I think the two that ttx wanted to discuss adding, (or probably more important, wanted to develop a process for adding) were DLM and Barbican.19:36
rocky_gThe bigger the site, the more stuff you need to manage the more stuff19:36
harlowjathe zuul  v3 folks have an interesting view on this to19:36
harlowjathey are using zookeeper for some more advanced stuff (farther down the spectrum than just locks)19:37
harlowja(thus the education part)19:37
harlowjawhy is monty not in here :-P19:37
dtroyer_zzI think he has Stockholm syndrome?19:37
dtroyer_zzer, is in Stockholm?19:37
dtroyer_zz:)19:38
nikhilwat!19:38
rocky_gThis is where I think upstream university should have sections for all OpenStack developers to learn about current and new conventions.  Like Zookeeper19:38
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly19:38
*** byrdog55 has quit IRC19:38
nikhildtroyer_zz: oh, is in Stockholm!19:38
harlowjarocky_g that'd be nice (for people inside and outside of openstack IMHO)19:38
dtroyer_zznikhil: sub-par joke19:38
*** ddieterly has quit IRC19:39
rocky_gYup.  F2F training to get the folks on the same page as technologies and architecture change19:39
harlowjaya, i feel even if we say magically technology/architecture whizbang19:39
SpamapSrocky_g: that's a great point actually. Our efforts to create design should flow into upstream U19:40
harlowjathat unless u know what whizbang means u'll just be like whatever19:40
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
SpamapSalso19:40
SpamapShttp://docs.openstack.org/arch-design/19:40
Shrewso/19:40
SpamapS#link http://docs.openstack.org/arch-design/19:40
SpamapSWe should work with the authors of that a lot.19:40
rocky_g++19:40
SpamapSThat book is about end-user architecture19:40
harlowjahi Shrews, just was getting into how your zuul v3 perspective might be a interesting one19:41
*** tmcpeak has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
SpamapSAnd we're going to be making assertions that flow directly into end-user architecture decisions.19:41
harlowjaand the spectrum of how a system like zookeeper is more of a spectrum with DLM on one side of it19:41
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
SpamapSSo whenever we consider a proposal, we should always make sure to plan doc work on the architecture design guide.19:41
*** spzala has quit IRC19:41
harlowjathere is a book?19:41
*** byrdog55 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
harlowjawoah19:41
harlowjalol19:41
SpamapSharlowja: it's for designing your built cloud, not for designing OpenStack. :)19:41
harlowjaoh19:42
harlowjanm then19:42
rocky_gThere should be an OpenStack Architectural Concepts that is for the Projects' architectural features/philosphies19:42
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
SpamapSanyway19:42
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
harlowjamy point heard though, thx :)19:42
harlowja(it will imho be the hardest thing of all)19:43
*** neilus has quit IRC19:43
harlowja(to teach fishing, lol)19:43
SpamapSShrews: for more context, what we're saying is, we want to let people depend on the existence of DLM as they design openstack projects.19:43
harlowjacan we also get past calling it a DLM ;)19:44
* harlowja i'd like that :-P19:44
SpamapSnope19:44
harlowjamaybe call it a consenus-enabler, lol19:44
Shrewsjust to be clear, your definition of DLM is distributed lock manager, yes?19:44
SpamapSthat sounds so hippie19:44
SpamapScoordination service?19:45
harlowjaah, that'd be nicer19:45
*** spzala_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:45
harlowjabetter19:45
SpamapSTooz fronted coordination service?19:45
harlowjaDLM just to me implies only locks19:45
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC19:45
harlowjaand these systems are greater than that :-P19:45
rocky_gtraffic controller19:45
harlowjacoordination service i think is ok19:46
rocky_glike on trains and tracks19:46
harlowjaunsure the metaphor there, ha19:46
*** spzala has quit IRC19:46
rocky_gthe system that keeps trains from crashing into each other as they share portions of the same tracks19:47
harlowjais there a tron reference we can use, lol19:47
harlowjaMCP?19:47
*** KrishR1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
harlowjalol19:47
SpamapSanyway19:47
*** KrishR has quit IRC19:48
SpamapSI think we have decided we want to at least work on documenting what that is19:48
SpamapSand what we want developers to be able to expect, and deployers too19:48
harlowjaya, a good thing to reference is the watcher capabilitiy of these systems19:48
harlowjasuch capability goes beyond locks19:48
*** byrdog55 has quit IRC19:48
SpamapSwhat about Barbican?19:49
*** dizquierdo is now known as dizquierdo_afk19:49
*** spzala_ has quit IRC19:49
* SpamapS hears crickets19:50
woodster_Regarding Barbican, is the goal to provide a ref arch for utilizing such systems? The barbican team has been trying to figure out the best way to promote integration with other projects19:50
* harlowja doesn't know enough about Barbican 19:50
SpamapSwoodster_: sort of19:50
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
SpamapSwoodster_: I'm proxying ttx here, but basically, when you go to write AaaS (Anything as a Service) in OpenStack, you can count on a few things being there implicitly..19:51
SpamapSwoodster_: DB, Keystone, MQ, wsgi, etc.19:51
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:51
harlowjaso an interesting sorta thing for this, and i don't know the answer, is there is some kind of overlap here with docker and kubernetes, how much interest do folks have in these 2 worlds might be an intersting question19:51
harlowjahow much out of openstack outreach do we care about (?)19:51
woodster_SpamapS: yep, and barbican ain't one of them (yet?) :)19:51
SpamapSwoodster_: and we're wondering if this group can help do the work to allow a coordination service and/or barbican to be on the same level as DB/MQ/Keystone/etc.19:51
woodster_it seems security is one of those deployer-choice gray levels19:52
SpamapSwoodster_: a ref arch is something I'd expect Barbican to provide for that, but there's also some practical matters that concern me.19:52
SpamapSMostly, my fellow engineers who have evaluated Barbican tell me that it doesn't add much value without HSM's.19:52
*** Na3iL has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC19:53
woodster_some deployers want to talk to crypto resource directly (like KMIPs). So Castellan was introduced as a way to adapt projects to a key manager....barbican is but one plugin for that, but is not required19:53
SpamapSBut if we make it part of the base services of OpenStack, we expect everybody, even thouse without HSM's, to deploy it.19:53
dtroyer_zzSpamapS: correct, but how much value does anything else have without HMS either?  The idea being we need to assume the interfaces are availble and functional19:53
SpamapSdtroyer_zz: anything else has less complexity.19:53
* dtroyer_zz types slowly19:53
woodster_SpamapS: well, TLS doesn't add much value unless you stop using self-signed certs. Barbican allows you to use a secure backend if you want. Out of the box it doesn't of course.19:54
*** ijw has quit IRC19:54
dtroyer_zzthe win without the hardware is simply converging OpenStack services to a single solution19:54
woodster_I think if you don't ever need secure storage of keys, then barbican isn't needed. But  if you do someday...19:55
SpamapSTLS doesn't add _as much_ value w/ self signed certs. However, it offers a ton of value in limited context. You can pre-cache certs without PKI and get a lot of value.19:55
rocky_gdtroyer_zz, that's a big win, still19:55
SpamapSBut Barbican without an HSM is just an audit logger, right?19:55
*** mickeys has quit IRC19:56
SpamapSHm19:56
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
dtroyer_zzcan it not store keys just as badly as Apache does on disk?19:56
woodster_SpamapS: yeah I'd agree with that.19:56
SpamapSIt can, and maybe having it there, already in the implementation, for those that need the HSM security, is enough to have those not interested in HSM's just use the less secure one.19:56
*** ayoung has quit IRC19:57
SpamapSBut there's a pretty valid argument that adding complexity is adding risk, which would be _the opposite_ of the goal of making Barbican a base service.19:57
dtroyer_zzI understood one motivation for doing this now was to help Nova and Cinder head toward the same thing, sooner than later19:57
SpamapSWe're running low on time, but what's this Castellan thing?19:57
woodster_so it seems that the choices are no barbican (store on disk) or spend $$$ for HSM for secure storage. I think those are valid choices for a deployer to make of course, and one solution to both would seem to be the best. I think a combo of Castellan (lightweight) with Barbican might be the best balance19:58
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
*** mars_toktonaliev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
woodster_Castellan is a lightweight adapter to a key manager backend that projects can integrate with19:58
dtroyer_zzso good, we have the questions that need answering!19:58
SpamapSIf we can't say Barbican is always going to be around for deployers, but Catellan is, is that a step forward?19:58
woodster_barbican is not required if you use that19:58
*** tgtanya has quit IRC19:58
SpamapSBut that only solves it for "under the cloud" problems19:59
SpamapSFor users, they won't have a key manager.19:59
*** GordonTX has quit IRC19:59
woodster_SpamapS: I think this would be great to discuss more in Spain19:59
SpamapSAnd so something like, say, Zaqar, can't depend on it19:59
SpamapSwoodster_: Agreed19:59
SpamapSwith 30s left we need to wrap up19:59
SpamapSwoodster_: I hope you'll join us again next week and we can get your feedback on ttx's proposal19:59
SpamapSthanks everyone!19:59
SpamapS#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Sep 22 20:00:03 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-09-22-19.02.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-09-22-19.02.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-09-22-19.02.log.html20:00
*** mars_toktonaliev has quit IRC20:01
*** mars_toktonaliev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
*** mars_toktonaliev has quit IRC20:02
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** ijw has quit IRC20:03
*** dasanind has quit IRC20:03
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** rustyl has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
*** KrishR1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** byrdog55 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** ddieterly has quit IRC20:14
*** gouthamr has quit IRC20:20
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
*** panda|break is now known as panda20:25
*** dasanind has quit IRC20:26
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC20:28
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** spzala has quit IRC20:28
*** pvaneck_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC20:31
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]20:32
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
*** absubram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
*** absubram has quit IRC20:33
*** absubram_ is now known as absubram20:33
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** pvaneck has quit IRC20:33
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** cdelatte has quit IRC20:37
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly20:37
*** dasanind has quit IRC20:38
*** baoli_ has quit IRC20:40
*** ansmith has quit IRC20:42
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]20:43
*** rocky_g has quit IRC20:46
*** ijw has quit IRC20:48
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC20:50
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz20:50
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:50
*** cknight has quit IRC20:51
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC20:53
*** sdague has quit IRC20:56
*** dizquierdo_afk has quit IRC21:01
*** piet has quit IRC21:02
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
*** piet has quit IRC21:06
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:07
*** rocky_g has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:07
*** dtroyer_zz has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:08
*** kfarr_ has quit IRC21:09
*** myoung is now known as myoung|gone21:10
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]21:10
*** spzala has quit IRC21:10
*** GordonTX has quit IRC21:13
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:18
*** obondarev has quit IRC21:18
*** ddieterly[away] has quit IRC21:20
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:22
*** pvaneck_ has quit IRC21:25
*** pvaneck_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:26
*** cleong has quit IRC21:26
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC21:27
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** rcernin has quit IRC21:34
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:35
*** byrdog55 has quit IRC21:35
*** spzala has quit IRC21:36
*** GordonTX has quit IRC21:36
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC21:36
*** cdent has quit IRC21:36
*** nijaba has quit IRC21:37
*** pcarver has quit IRC21:37
*** pkoniszewski has quit IRC21:37
*** bradjones has quit IRC21:37
*** strigazi has quit IRC21:37
*** amitkqed has quit IRC21:37
*** ddieterly has quit IRC21:37
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC21:37
*** beslemon has quit IRC21:37
*** xyang1 has quit IRC21:37
*** amotoki has quit IRC21:37
*** liuyulong has quit IRC21:37
*** tlashchova has quit IRC21:37
*** aginghipster has quit IRC21:37
*** irenab has quit IRC21:37
*** siva_krishnan has quit IRC21:37
*** haleyb has quit IRC21:37
*** jlvillal has quit IRC21:37
*** mikal has quit IRC21:37
*** maximov_ has quit IRC21:37
*** DuncanT has quit IRC21:37
*** mickeys has quit IRC21:37
*** knangia has quit IRC21:37
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC21:37
*** gcb has quit IRC21:37
*** acabot has quit IRC21:37
*** vipul has quit IRC21:37
*** sweston has quit IRC21:37
*** sshank has quit IRC21:37
*** markstur has quit IRC21:37
*** myoung|gone has quit IRC21:37
*** slagle has quit IRC21:37
*** mhayden has quit IRC21:37
*** agordeev has quit IRC21:37
*** ddmitriev has quit IRC21:37
*** B_Smith has quit IRC21:37
*** iremizov has quit IRC21:37
*** asingh_ has quit IRC21:37
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC21:37
*** greghaynes has quit IRC21:37
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:37
*** ameade has quit IRC21:37
*** ildikov has quit IRC21:37
*** warpc has quit IRC21:37
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC21:37
*** IgorYozhikov has quit IRC21:37
*** shadower has quit IRC21:37
*** abramley has quit IRC21:37
*** jay-mehta has quit IRC21:37
*** bswartz has quit IRC21:37
*** kragniz has quit IRC21:37
*** ativelkov has quit IRC21:37
*** meow-nofer_ has quit IRC21:37
*** sigmavirus has quit IRC21:37
*** timothyb89 has quit IRC21:37
*** margaret has quit IRC21:37
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC21:37
*** kgalanov has quit IRC21:37
*** tkhno has quit IRC21:37
*** sindhu has quit IRC21:37
*** johnsom_ has quit IRC21:37
*** teran has quit IRC21:37
*** sballe_ has quit IRC21:37
*** zhiyan has quit IRC21:37
*** nikhil has quit IRC21:37
*** ptoohill has quit IRC21:37
*** mugsie has quit IRC21:37
*** SergK has quit IRC21:37
*** xgerman has quit IRC21:37
*** rocky_g has quit IRC21:37
*** iyamahat has quit IRC21:37
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC21:37
*** jpeeler has quit IRC21:37
*** freerunner has quit IRC21:37
*** rhagarty_ has quit IRC21:37
*** kbyrne has quit IRC21:37
*** mkoderer__ has quit IRC21:37
*** dosaboy has quit IRC21:37
*** ansiwen has quit IRC21:37
*** akscram has quit IRC21:37
*** mestery has quit IRC21:37
*** dougshelley66 has quit IRC21:37
*** stevemar has quit IRC21:37
*** ttx has quit IRC21:37
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC21:37
*** Ablu has quit IRC21:37
*** coreyob has quit IRC21:37
*** dloi has quit IRC21:37
*** ajo has quit IRC21:37
*** jcook has quit IRC21:37
*** vgnbkr has quit IRC21:37
*** gothicmindfood has quit IRC21:37
*** peterstac has quit IRC21:37
*** dane_leblanc_ has quit IRC21:37
*** kevo has quit IRC21:37
*** vinaypotluri has quit IRC21:37
*** njohnston has quit IRC21:37
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:37
*** uxdanielle has quit IRC21:37
*** ccamacho|afk has quit IRC21:37
*** ircuser-1 has quit IRC21:37
*** jroll has quit IRC21:37
*** georgelorch has quit IRC21:37
*** eggmaster has quit IRC21:37
*** amit213 has quit IRC21:37
*** gus has quit IRC21:37
*** leifz has quit IRC21:37
*** dimtruck has quit IRC21:37
*** blogan has quit IRC21:37
*** doude has quit IRC21:37
*** csatari has quit IRC21:37
*** evgenyl has quit IRC21:37
*** sslypushenko has quit IRC21:37
*** pasquier-s has quit IRC21:37
*** dlundquist has quit IRC21:37
*** yonglihe has quit IRC21:37
*** zubchick has quit IRC21:37
*** CaptTofu has quit IRC21:37
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC21:37
*** netapp has quit IRC21:37
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:37
*** goldenfri has quit IRC21:37
*** dcwangmit01_ has quit IRC21:37
*** katyafervent_awa has quit IRC21:37
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:37
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC21:37
*** HenryG has quit IRC21:37
*** dklenov has quit IRC21:37
*** ikutukov has quit IRC21:37
*** monester_ has quit IRC21:37
*** docaedo has quit IRC21:37
*** amrith has quit IRC21:37
*** timsim has quit IRC21:37
*** lxsli has quit IRC21:37
*** andreaf has quit IRC21:37
*** spotz_zzz has quit IRC21:37
*** lewo has quit IRC21:37
*** mgagne has quit IRC21:37
*** toan has quit IRC21:37
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** vipul has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** myoung|gone has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** mhayden has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** agordeev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** ddmitriev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** B_Smith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** iremizov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** asingh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** warpc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** IgorYozhikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** kragniz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** abramley has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** jay-mehta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** meow-nofer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sigmavirus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** timothyb89 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** margaret has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** kgalanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** tkhno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** johnsom_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** ptoohill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** SergK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** pvaneck_ has quit IRC21:38
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
*** macsz has quit IRC21:39
*** kong has quit IRC21:39
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC21:39
*** unrahul has quit IRC21:40
*** dane_leblanc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** goldenfri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** uxdanielle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** ccamacho|afk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** ircuser-1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** jroll has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** eggmaster has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** gus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** leifz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** dimtruck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** blogan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** sslypushenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** yonglihe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** zubchick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** CaptTofu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** netapp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** dcwangmit01_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** katyafervent_awa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** lewo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** dklenov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** ikutukov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** monester_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** docaedo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** timsim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** lxsli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** spotz_zzz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** mgagne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** toan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** sweston has quit IRC21:40
*** ildikov has quit IRC21:40
*** kgalanov has quit IRC21:40
*** teran has quit IRC21:40
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** pcarver has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** pkoniszewski has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** strigazi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** amitkqed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:40
*** serverascode has quit IRC21:41
*** CaptTofu has quit IRC21:41
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** tlashchova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** aginghipster has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** siva_krishnan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** jlvillal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** maximov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** agordeev has quit IRC21:41
*** asingh_ has quit IRC21:41
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:41
*** ameade has quit IRC21:41
*** zhiyan has quit IRC21:41
*** nikhil has quit IRC21:41
*** maximov_ has quit IRC21:41
*** cknight has quit IRC21:42
*** GordonTX has quit IRC21:42
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC21:42
*** rocky_g has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** freerunner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** rhagarty_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** gothicmindfood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** mkoderer__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** ansiwen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** akscram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** dougshelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** Ablu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** coreyob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** dloi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** jcook has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** vgnbkr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** peterstac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** Na3iL has quit IRC21:42
*** beslemon has quit IRC21:43
*** vinaypotluri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:43
*** sslypushenko has quit IRC21:43
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** tkhno has quit IRC21:44
*** sindhu has quit IRC21:44
*** amit213 has quit IRC21:44
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:44
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC21:44
*** hrybacki has quit IRC21:45
*** pasquier-s has quit IRC21:45
*** yonglihe has quit IRC21:45
*** spzala has quit IRC21:47
*** agordeev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC21:49
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:50
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:50
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:50
*** jcoufal has quit IRC21:50
*** kong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** dlundquist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
*** rocky_g has quit IRC21:59
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC22:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:02
*** ddieterly is now known as ddieterly[away]22:02
*** kgalanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** tkhno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** unrahul has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** sslypushenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** ddieterly[away] is now known as ddieterly22:05
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
*** evgenyl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
*** yonglihe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** DuncanT has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** pasquier-s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:09
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:09
*** banix has quit IRC22:09
*** edtubill has quit IRC22:09
*** csatari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
*** asingh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:11
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:11
*** sindhu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:12
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** serverascode has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:15
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** Leo_ has quit IRC22:16
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:17
*** marst has quit IRC22:18
*** CaptTofu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:18
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC22:18
*** jrist has quit IRC22:19
*** xyang1 has quit IRC22:20
*** maximov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** Leo_ has quit IRC22:22
*** dasanind has quit IRC22:23
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:24
*** panda is now known as panda|zZ22:28
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:32
*** marst has quit IRC22:54
*** GordonTX has quit IRC22:58
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:58
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** GordonTX has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:03
*** hongbin has quit IRC23:05
*** HeOS has quit IRC23:10
*** cdent has quit IRC23:12
*** ayoung has quit IRC23:13
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:24
*** HenryG has quit IRC23:28
*** beslemon has quit IRC23:28
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:28
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC23:29
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** GordonTX has quit IRC23:32
*** armax has quit IRC23:33
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:35
*** Swami has quit IRC23:42
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:42
*** snackewm has quit IRC23:44
*** ddieterly has quit IRC23:45
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC23:51
*** marst has quit IRC23:57
*** dasanind has quit IRC23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!