Monday, 2015-01-05

*** teran_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:03
*** teran has quit IRC00:07
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC00:08
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:22
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:24
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:25
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:29
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC00:49
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC01:09
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:12
*** bradjones has quit IRC01:17
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:19
*** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work01:26
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:35
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:36
*** test2222 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:39
*** test2222 has quit IRC01:40
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:43
*** ijw has quit IRC01:43
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC01:48
*** kebray has quit IRC01:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:05
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:09
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:11
*** daneyon has quit IRC02:12
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:13
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:14
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:15
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC02:17
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** daneyon has quit IRC02:17
*** ijw has quit IRC02:19
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:19
*** ijw_ has quit IRC02:21
*** woodster_ has quit IRC02:30
*** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away02:32
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:32
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC02:42
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:48
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:54
*** erkules_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:54
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:54
*** erkules has quit IRC02:56
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:56
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck02:57
*** ijw has quit IRC03:02
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:13
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC03:15
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:15
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:18
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:22
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:33
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:35
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:39
*** xuhanp has quit IRC03:41
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:41
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:45
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** ijw has quit IRC04:02
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:06
*** Longgeek has quit IRC04:07
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:11
*** Longgeek has quit IRC04:13
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** Longgeek has quit IRC04:14
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:15
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:20
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** ijw has quit IRC04:32
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:42
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:47
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:51
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:59
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa05:04
*** dboik has quit IRC05:05
*** sorrison has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:12
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:14
*** achanda has quit IRC05:20
*** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work05:20
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:26
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:29
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:30
*** ijw has quit IRC05:32
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:33
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC05:35
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:36
*** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away05:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:37
*** cloudpie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:38
*** cloudpie has quit IRC05:39
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:39
*** prmtl has quit IRC05:39
*** daneyon has quit IRC05:40
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:40
*** daneyon has quit IRC05:41
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:43
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:44
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:46
*** daneyon has quit IRC05:46
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:48
*** Murali has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:52
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:54
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:06
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:14
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:26
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:29
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:30
*** ijw has quit IRC06:32
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:34
*** Longgeek has quit IRC06:37
*** sgotliv has quit IRC06:42
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:44
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:47
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:49
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:52
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** nshah has left #openstack-meeting-alt07:11
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:14
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** nshah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:18
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC07:25
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:26
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:26
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:29
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:31
*** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work07:32
*** ijw has quit IRC07:32
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:33
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:37
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:39
*** achanda has quit IRC07:44
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC07:45
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:45
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** achanda_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** achanda has quit IRC07:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:51
*** achanda_ has quit IRC07:52
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:54
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:02
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:03
*** agordeev has quit IRC08:04
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** rm_work is now known as rm_work|away08:08
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** woodster_ has quit IRC08:10
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC08:13
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:17
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:22
*** HeOS has quit IRC08:23
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** ijw has quit IRC08:31
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** stamak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:38
*** kobis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:40
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** mikedillion has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:53
*** achanda has quit IRC08:59
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** mikedillion has quit IRC09:00
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:01
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:04
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** xuhanp has quit IRC09:05
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC09:07
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** ddmitriev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** i159 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** kobis has quit IRC09:20
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:23
*** teran_ has quit IRC09:25
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** achanda has quit IRC09:28
*** kobis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:28
*** ijw has quit IRC09:32
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:33
*** andreaf_ is now known as andreaf09:40
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:53
*** tteggel_ is now known as tteggel10:01
*** tteggel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:01
*** teran_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:15
*** teran has quit IRC10:18
*** teran_ has quit IRC10:19
*** amotoki has quit IRC10:19
*** irenab has quit IRC10:20
*** ekarlso- has quit IRC10:24
*** ekarlso- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:26
*** ijw has quit IRC10:32
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr10:36
*** nshaikh has quit IRC10:41
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:44
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:54
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:56
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away10:57
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC11:14
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:15
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:17
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:20
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** teran has quit IRC11:21
*** selva_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC11:30
*** ijw has quit IRC11:32
*** selva_ has quit IRC11:32
*** kobis has quit IRC11:36
*** sgotliv has quit IRC11:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:36
*** Murali has quit IRC11:36
*** sorrison has quit IRC11:36
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC11:36
*** miguelgrinberg has quit IRC11:36
*** rharwood has quit IRC11:36
*** nijaba has quit IRC11:36
*** georgelorch has quit IRC11:36
*** alazarev has quit IRC11:36
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC11:36
*** juice has quit IRC11:36
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:36
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:36
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** Murali has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** sorrison has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** kobis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** ajo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** ajo has quit IRC11:37
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** nijaba has quit IRC11:38
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:40
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:40
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** rharwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** miguelgrinberg_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:42
*** ndipanov has quit IRC11:43
*** amotoki has quit IRC11:49
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:58
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC12:02
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:10
*** ijw has quit IRC12:12
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:16
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:17
*** teran has quit IRC12:22
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC12:22
*** wbrothers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** Guest2400 is now known as b3nt_pin12:23
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles12:23
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:25
*** irenab has quit IRC12:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:26
*** amotoki_ is now known as amotoki12:27
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** ijw has quit IRC12:32
*** miguelgrinberg_ is now known as miguelgrinberg12:32
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky-lunch12:34
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:35
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:35
*** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC12:38
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:38
*** ajo_ is now known as ajo12:43
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:49
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:51
*** bradjones has quit IRC12:51
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** PeterSchwaller_ has quit IRC12:53
*** ddmitriev has quit IRC13:00
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** ddmitriev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
*** beagles has quit IRC13:08
*** u_glide has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** betsy has quit IRC13:13
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr13:13
*** fzdarsky-lunch is now known as fzdarsky13:13
*** Guest80001 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** u_glide has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** rharwood has quit IRC13:19
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** SridharG has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** doude has quit IRC13:21
*** rharwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
*** teran has quit IRC13:22
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** Guest80001 is now known as beagles13:26
*** erkules_ is now known as erkules13:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** doude has quit IRC13:30
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:30
*** jehb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
*** ijw has quit IRC13:32
*** doude has quit IRC13:37
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:37
*** irenab has quit IRC13:38
*** tedross has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC13:40
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** Murali has quit IRC13:47
*** stamak has quit IRC13:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** stannie has quit IRC13:53
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away13:53
*** kobis has quit IRC13:54
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_13:54
*** dboik has quit IRC13:55
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:55
*** kobis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** sgordon is now known as steveg13:56
*** kobis has quit IRC13:56
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:56
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr13:56
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** kobis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** steveg has quit IRC13:59
*** steveg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** radez_g0n3 has quit IRC14:01
*** prmtl has quit IRC14:01
*** rharwood has quit IRC14:04
*** radez_g0n3 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC14:04
*** rharwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** steveg has quit IRC14:05
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** dbhaskaran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** bknudson has quit IRC14:06
*** steveg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away14:12
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr14:13
*** zeddii has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** teran has quit IRC14:23
*** baoli has quit IRC14:23
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away14:25
*** dboik has quit IRC14:25
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** dboik has quit IRC14:26
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:27
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:27
*** dboik has quit IRC14:28
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
*** dboik has quit IRC14:28
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
*** dboik has quit IRC14:29
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
*** ijw has quit IRC14:32
*** prmtl has quit IRC14:33
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** mikedillion has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC14:37
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** mattfarina has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC14:41
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:41
*** cbouch has quit IRC14:42
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC14:46
*** prmtl has quit IRC14:48
*** X019 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith14:49
*** jgrimm is now known as zz_jgrimm14:52
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** marrusl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** irenab has quit IRC14:57
*** prmtl has quit IRC14:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:58
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** prmtl has quit IRC15:03
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:04
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack15:05
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez15:11
*** dboik has quit IRC15:12
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2415:12
*** prmtl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
*** bobmel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
*** numan has quit IRC15:19
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
*** X019 has quit IRC15:20
*** prmtl has quit IRC15:20
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
*** bobmel has quit IRC15:22
*** teran has quit IRC15:24
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck15:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
*** andreaf is now known as andreaf_15:27
*** zz_jgrimm is now known as jgrimm15:27
*** andreaf_ has quit IRC15:27
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
*** dboik has quit IRC15:29
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
*** sgotliv has quit IRC15:30
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** ijw has quit IRC15:32
*** X019 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** dboik has quit IRC15:33
*** mtanino_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
*** mtanino has quit IRC15:35
*** nshaikh has quit IRC15:35
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
*** jprovazn has quit IRC15:40
*** mtanino_ has quit IRC15:43
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
*** Guest75222 is now known as redrobot15:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC15:51
*** alaski_ is now known as alaski15:51
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC15:52
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
dhellmann#startmeeting oslo16:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Jan  5 16:00:57 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dhellmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'16:01
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC16:01
dhellmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo16:01
dhellmanncourtesy ping for jd__, dims, bnemec, flaper87, harlowja, viktors, rpodolyaka1, zzzeek, sileht, kgiusti16:01
dhellmanncourtesy ping for redrobot, jungleboyj, zhiyan, therve, amotoki, GheRivero, bknudson, ihrachyshka, jogo, dougwig, sreshetnyak, amrith16:01
jungleboyjo/16:01
zzzeeko/16:01
silehto/16:01
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
viktorso/16:01
rpodolyaka1o/16:01
jd__happy new year! \o/16:01
redroboto/16:01
dimso/ (partially here)16:01
dhellmannhappy new year, everyone16:01
beekneemecho/16:01
bknudsonhi16:01
*** beekneemech is now known as bnemec16:01
jungleboyjHappy New Year!16:01
redrobotwoot 2015!16:01
ozamiatino/16:01
sigmavirus24happy new year all16:02
silehthappy new yeah16:02
*** inc0 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
bnemecI have another conflict today so I may be semi-absent.16:02
*** jemangs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
inc0hello, any chances to drop something to agenda yet?16:02
dhellmannit should be a relatively quick meeting today16:02
bnemecI really thought Monday morning would be a safe time to schedule this. :-/16:02
dhellmanninc0: we usually have an "open discussion" section at the end of the meeting16:02
inc0allright16:03
dhellmann#topic Review action items from previous meeting16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Review action items from previous meeting (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:03
dhellmann#info dhellmann make sure instructions for creating a new library are up to date with stable requirements jobs - DONE16:03
dhellmannwe didn't meet last week, so that's a pretty old one :-)16:03
dhellmann#topic dropping namespace packages16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "dropping namespace packages (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:03
dhellmann#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo-incubator/+spec/drop-namespace-packages16:03
dhellmann#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/053737.html16:03
dhellmannAs I mentioned on the mailing list there, we have a few libraries ready for releases with the namespace package changes.16:03
dhellmannTo avoid breaking too many things at once, we should release them one at a time, with some delay in between.16:03
dhellmannI thought I would cut a release of oslo.config later today, and follow that up with one of the others after a few hours.16:04
bknudsonwhere's your sense of adventure?16:04
dhellmannThen tomorrow two more, etc.16:04
dimsbknudson: hehe16:04
dhellmannbknudson: it was burned off ages ago :-)16:04
dimsdhellmann: sounds good16:04
dhellmannliaisons, there's no real rush to update the imports in your project, but we don't want you to delay it either16:05
dhellmannI know with the k-2 deadline coming up in a few weeks there's going to be a rush of other changes16:05
dhellmannare there any questions or other comments about the plan for this?16:06
jungleboyjdhellmann: At this point, which libraries should we be making changes for?16:06
dhellmannjungleboyj: right now, only oslo.concurrency has been released with this change, I think. Watch the mailing list for other release announcements.16:06
*** miqui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** achanda has quit IRC16:06
jungleboyjdhellmann: Ok, we have concurrency done.  I will start tackling the others as they come.16:07
dhellmannjungleboyj: good, thanks16:07
dhellmannok, speaking of kilo-216:07
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
dhellmann#topic status check for kilo-216:07
*** openstack changes topic to "status check for kilo-2 (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:07
dhellmannWe have quite a few blueprints and bug fixes in progress.16:07
dhellmannWe need to look at each of them and see whether we're actually on schedule to finish them by their current projected deadline.16:07
dimsdhellmann: should we do oslo.log before kilo-2?16:07
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
dhellmannI don't expect to do that today, but please be prepared to discuss them next week.16:08
bknudsonhere's the keystone change for oslo_concurrency: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139777/16:08
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
dhellmann#action dhellmann email dev list reminding oslo contributors to be ready to discuss schedule at the next meeting16:08
bknudson(merged)16:08
dhellmanndims: let's figure out today what else is left to add before we're ready for a first release16:08
dimsdhellmann: ack16:08
dhellmannbknudson: good reference, thanks16:09
dhellmannso that's for next week16:09
dhellmann#topic Red flags for/from liaisons16:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:09
dhellmannliaisons, are you encountering any issues?16:10
bnemecNone for tripleo16:10
bknudsonkeystone could use a new release of oslo.middleware with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144700/16:10
bknudsonalso, the config generator ordering issue fix16:10
jungleboyjNo major issues.  I have updated most of the incubator code in Cinder but am having an issue with policy that I need to further investigate.16:10
dhellmannbknudson: ok, I think it's safe to release middleware since we haven't done the namespace work there16:10
jungleboyjI will open an issue on that after I look at it a bit more.16:11
bknudsonlooks like the change to use the new config generator is going to merge without the fix and we'll just pick it up when it's there.16:11
dhellmann#action dhellmann talk to gordc about releasing oslo.middleware16:11
bnemecThe ordering fix merged to oslo.config, didn't it?16:11
bnemecIn which case it should be in the release tomorrow.16:11
bknudsongreat, we'll pick it up then16:12
dhellmannbnemec: yes, I don't see it as an open patch so I think it merged16:12
*** achanda has quit IRC16:12
dhellmann#link https://review.openstack.org/13648216:12
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
dhellmannI think that's the one16:12
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle16:13
bknudsonyep, that'll do it16:13
dhellmannjungleboyj: the spec to graduate the policy module was approved over the break: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo-incubator/+spec/graduate-policy16:14
*** crc32 has quit IRC16:14
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
*** pradk is now known as prad-afk16:14
dhellmannjungleboyj: if you find any bugs, we'll need to make sure we coordinate with adam about where/when to fix16:14
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:15
jungleboyjdhellmann: Well do.16:15
dhellmannlet's move on16:15
dhellmann#topic Ongoing work & Review priorities16:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Ongoing work & Review priorities (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:15
dhellmann#link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/next-kilo16:15
dhellmann#link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/kilo-216:15
dhellmannIs anyone blocked on work we prioritized for this release?16:15
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
dhellmannI'm seeing a lot of failures in neutron tests for my oslo.messaging patch. I've had other issues to fix with it, so I haven't debugged those, yet. Does anyone know if there's currently a race condition with neutron?16:16
*** atiwari has quit IRC16:16
* dhellmann prepares to debug the failures himself16:17
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC16:17
dhellmann#topic open discussion16:18
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:18
bknudsondhellmann: thanks.16:18
dhellmanninc0: you had something?16:18
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
silehtdhellmann, I have already seen some issue with this jobs on other review, I will check this is the same I issue I have started to investigate16:18
inc0yup, oslo.versionedobjects16:18
dhellmannsileht: ah, good, thanks16:19
inc0anyone has started any work on that? what is status of this bp? anything I could help with?16:19
dhellmannthe work hasn't been started. I think we're blocked on my promise to prepare a repository based on the code currently in nova.16:19
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
dhellmannI've spent a lot more time on this namespace package thing than I expected to16:20
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
viktorsdhellmann, zzzeek - I'd like to ask, what DB driver should we use for MySQL in py3 env?16:20
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
viktorsI confused by Doug's comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133962/16:21
zzzeekviktors: well I think mysql-connector is most appropriate16:21
viktorsI remember, that jd__ was against mysqlconnector on summit16:21
zzzeekviktors: we have two contacts at oracle who are interested in keeping it working16:21
dhellmannI can never remember, which one is the one from oracle?16:21
viktorsand it still not hosted on pypi16:21
inc0I'd like to help, even code the thing if needed, but I'd like few pointers, repo you mention, and well, any help I can get:)16:21
zzzeekviktors: that’s an issue they seek to solve16:21
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:22
viktorszzzeek: yes, but why can't we use PyMySQL for now?16:22
* jd__ is against MySQL whatever it is :p16:22
viktors:-D16:22
zzzeekviktors: our contacts are Andrew Rist and Geert Vanderkelen16:22
dhellmanninc0: extracting the code from the nova repository using a modified version of our graduate.sh script is going to be fairly complicated, which is why I offered to do it for dan. If you feel comfortable with git, maybe that's something you want to look at?16:22
zzzeekviktors: because it is not maintained to the levels of quality that openstack should have16:22
zzzeekjd__: sure, but good luck with that :)16:23
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
viktorszzzeek: ok, but is there any top quality, pypi hosted and py3 compatible db driver? )16:23
zzzeekviktors: not particularly :)16:24
viktors:)16:24
viktorsbad luck16:24
inc0dhellmann, I can do it, although I would need few pointers from you16:24
dhellmannzzzeek: is oracle planning to publish the package to pypi?16:24
inc0like this graduate.sh thing;)16:24
dhellmanninc0: ok, let's talk more after this meeting16:24
inc0sure16:24
zzzeekdhellmann: I’ll send andrew somehting of an ultimatum16:24
dhellmanninc0: graduate.sh is in the incubator repository under "tools"16:24
*** teran has quit IRC16:24
dhellmannzzzeek: yeah, that's a big blocker for us adopting it16:25
zzzeekdhellmann: OK16:25
viktorszzzeek: they "supposed to publish" for a few month already, afaik16:25
*** balajiiyer1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:26
dhellmannwe need someone to take the lead on this driver issue, to summarize all of the information we have and keep track of progress or issues16:26
dhellmannvolunteers?16:26
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
viktorsI can try to summarize the information we have, but I can miss something16:27
dhellmanna wiki page would be a good start16:27
dhellmannsure, I just need someone who knows more about it than I do to get it started :-)16:28
dhellmanndoes anyone else have a topic to raise this week?16:28
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
bknudsoncan't think of anything.16:29
dhellmannok, well, let's stop a little early -- spend your extra 30 minutes reviewing oslo patches, please! :-)16:29
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
* ihrachyshka is sorry for being late16:30
dhellmannhi, ihrachyshka - we were just wrapping up16:30
ihrachyshkadhellmann, aha! :) I have one thing16:30
ihrachyshkaoslo.concurrency release please ;)16:30
*** prad-afk is now known as pradk16:30
ihrachyshkaso that we can proceed with neutron16:30
dhellmannihrachyshka: what changes do you need?16:30
ihrachyshkaConfigFilter removal16:31
dhellmannah, right16:31
ihrachyshkathat was already committed16:31
dhellmannok, that is merged16:31
dhellmann#action dhellmann release oslo.concurrency16:31
dhellmannI'll wait to create the release until after the oslo.config release with the namespace package change16:31
zzzeekdhellmann: OK I’ve sent out an email and I think the answer is going to be more stalling, so if we want to get into pymysql i think we should maybe move in a bit on their github repo :)16:32
dhellmannI don't want 2 releases possibly introducing competing breaking changes16:32
*** achanda has quit IRC16:32
ihrachyshkaack16:32
dhellmannzzzeek: if they are interested in help, that may unblock us on this. Can you help viktors prepare that summary of what issues need to be addressed in the lib?16:33
dhellmannzzzeek, viktors : we should also make sure that there's a note on the python 3 page haypo maintains mentioning that we need a good db driver16:34
*** Longgeek has quit IRC16:35
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:35
dhellmannok, if there's nothing else we can all go review code16:35
zzzeekdhellmann: it’s just a casually run project, that’s all.  e.g. the crummy changelog, etc.16:35
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
zzzeekthere’s the big issue with eventlet monkeypatching as well, but all the drivers have that issue16:36
dhellmannzzzeek: I think we'd all rather use the driver from oracle. Maybe now that they're OpenStack Foundation members, we can convince them to put the code up on pypi.16:36
zzzeekdhellmann: OK will see what response I get16:36
dhellmannzzzeek: If we need to get the TC & Board involved, we can.16:37
zzzeekdhellmann: I think the issue is that Oracle wants to track downloads of their products16:37
zzzeekdhellmann: and pypi makes this impossible16:37
dhellmannsigh16:37
zzzeekdhellmann: I can’t say I don’t sympathize :)16:37
ihrachyshkadhellmann, zzzeek, if you need email of mysql connector guy, tell me (it was not trivial to find it)16:38
zzzeekihrachyshka: i have the emails16:38
ihrachyshka(which says enough about their dev model)16:38
ihrachyshkaack16:38
dhellmannzzzeek: ok, let's see what they say and then talk to the infra team about our options16:38
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr16:40
dhellmannI think we're done for today. Thank you, everyone!16:40
dhellmann#endmeeting16:40
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:40
openstackMeeting ended Mon Jan  5 16:40:37 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:40
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-01-05-16.00.html16:40
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-01-05-16.00.txt16:40
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2015/oslo.2015-01-05-16.00.log.html16:40
jungleboyjThanks.16:41
*** zzzeek has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:41
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away16:42
*** kobis has quit IRC16:45
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** jtomasek has quit IRC16:46
*** beagles has quit IRC16:48
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:48
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC16:48
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:53
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC16:54
*** viktors is now known as viktors|afk16:54
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC16:54
*** fzdarsky_ is now known as fzdarsky16:54
*** inc0 has quit IRC16:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** kgiusti has quit IRC17:04
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC17:05
*** dboik has quit IRC17:06
*** stannie has quit IRC17:06
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC17:06
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
*** EmilienM is now known as EmilienM|afk17:07
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** i159 has quit IRC17:07
*** dboik has quit IRC17:07
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** ijw has quit IRC17:12
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
*** dboik has quit IRC17:19
*** cinerama` is now known as cinerama17:19
*** rmoe has quit IRC17:19
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
*** dboik has quit IRC17:20
*** ChuckC has quit IRC17:20
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
*** mikedillion has quit IRC17:24
*** sarob__ is now known as sarob___17:24
*** sarob___ is now known as sarob____17:24
*** sarob has quit IRC17:25
*** teran has quit IRC17:25
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
*** sarob_ is now known as sarob17:27
*** sarob____ has quit IRC17:27
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
*** achanda has quit IRC17:28
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** ijw has quit IRC17:30
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:32
*** ijw_ has quit IRC17:33
*** achanda has quit IRC17:34
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
*** kashyap is now known as kashyap_bbiab17:35
*** alazarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** rbrady_ is now known as rbrady-lunch17:38
*** selva_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
*** safchain has quit IRC17:41
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:43
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** ijw has quit IRC17:44
*** daneyon has quit IRC17:45
*** cbouch has quit IRC17:45
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:48
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC17:49
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC17:53
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** derekh has quit IRC17:55
Sukhdevarmax: Ping17:55
*** nkrinner has quit IRC17:55
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
armaxSukhdev: pong17:56
* ijw lurks ominously17:56
Sukhdevarmax: good so, you are here - we have L2-GW meeting in next 4 mins.17:56
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** achanda has quit IRC17:59
*** sarob has quit IRC17:59
armaxSukhdev: it looks like Maruti is not online17:59
*** maruti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
armaxah, there he is!17:59
*** moshele has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** baoli_ has quit IRC17:59
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
Sukhdevarmax: what is Maruti's IRC handle?18:00
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa18:00
armaxSukhdev: maruti18:00
marutimaruti18:00
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2418:01
SukhdevFolks it is time - shall we get started?18:01
*** Barker has quit IRC18:01
marutiYes sure18:01
Sukhdevlet me start the meeting - this way we can capture the miutes18:01
*** sarob_ has quit IRC18:02
Sukhdev#startmeeting networking_l2GW18:02
openstackMeeting started Mon Jan  5 18:02:07 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Sukhdev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_l2GW)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_l2gw'18:02
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SukhdevFolks, welcome to our first L2-GW meeting18:02
SukhdevHappy New Year to all18:02
armaxSukhdev: welcome 2015!18:03
ChuckChi18:03
SukhdevAs you will notice, I did not put anything specific on the agenda - since this is first meeting, I thought we go free flow18:03
*** achanda has quit IRC18:04
SukhdevWe will define the agenda as we go along18:04
armaxSukhdev: yup, I suspect things will be slow, as we go back to normal after the holiday period18:04
armaxSukhdev: I am still catching up with reviews etc18:04
SukhdevTo start with, perhaps, armax you can give  us as to the progress on the L2-GW spec so far18:05
armaxSukhdev: sure18:05
armaxlet me start by saying that there have been a number of efforts that were labelled l2gw over the past few months18:06
*** Longgeek has quit IRC18:06
*** sgotliv has quit IRC18:07
armaxafaik the effort focus on this team is primarly on the specs that came out of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134179/18:07
armaxand https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136581/18:07
armaxat the same time, we also recognize that there is the need to get this effort off the ground in a way that is not tighly coupled with the Neutron code18:08
armax*recognized18:08
armaxto this aim, we started arranging ourselves in a way that allows us to collaborate without depending on Neutron, hence the stackforge project18:09
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
armaxmaruti has moved the aforementioned specs here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144173/  and here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144190/18:10
SukhdevHere is the link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141289/218:10
armaxin my view this is mostly for tracking purposes…I don’t believe that we should have a full blown spec process just yet18:10
armaxI think there’s enough meat on the bone for getting us started in contributing some code18:11
selva_Basic REST API(service plugin) code for l2 gateway except the extension file is checked-in to stackforge/networking-l2gw repo of openstack  L2 gateway agent code for l2gateway is checked-in to stackforge/networking-l2gw repo of openstack.  Code  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144097/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144215/ SPEC  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144173  Hi Armando I have a question regarding the extens18:11
armaxbut lots still remain to be done18:11
ijwI found the spec a bit more complex than I expected18:11
*** tdink has quit IRC18:11
*** sballe has quit IRC18:11
*** sweston has quit IRC18:12
*** erw has quit IRC18:12
ijwThr gateway -> device ('that represents an L2 gateway') -> port layering was odd18:12
armaxijw: I appreciate that some nomenclature or abstraction may look unfamiliar to some people18:12
*** persia has quit IRC18:12
*** persia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
*** persia has quit IRC18:12
*** persia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
ijwarmax: I think the issue here is that we define these terms (which are quite overloaded) as we go along, and so a glossary might be necessary18:13
*** rm_work|away has quit IRC18:13
*** aglarendil has quit IRC18:13
*** cyeoh has quit IRC18:13
armaxand perhaps this was the reason why we were unable to ultimately reach to a consensu18:13
armaxconsensus18:13
ijwarmax: There are other reasons too, I think18:13
armaxijw: that’s a good point18:13
*** meow-nofer has quit IRC18:13
ijwarmax: primarily that the stuff in the stackforge project sits neatly between two other efforts:18:13
armaxijw: that said, I wanted to stress the fact that if someone is compelled to come with his/her own version of what an l2gw should be18:14
ijw1. attaching any L2 network to Openstack in a programmatic way - such as MPLS18:14
*** edleafe has quit IRC18:14
*** stevebaker has quit IRC18:14
ijw2. merging L2 networks with VLANs, which doesn't have to be tied to anything physical18:14
armaxthey should be able to do so18:14
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC18:14
*** asadoughi has quit IRC18:14
*** jroll has quit IRC18:14
armaxcramming everything in a single project is not healthy IMO18:15
ijwarmax: With apologies for taking this a step backwards, but maybe we could use the wiki top list use cases just so that it's clear what we're trying to address and what we aren't?18:15
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
*** sc68cal has quit IRC18:15
*** CaptTofu_ has quit IRC18:15
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
Sukhdevijw: It is hard to make a conclusive list - however, I agree with the idea18:16
armaxijw: we tried to make the API spec as clear as possible as to what we’re targeting18:16
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
armaxijw: I really don’t want to boil the ocean for now18:16
*** jroll has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
*** asadoughi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
ijwI'm the one who's usually arguing 'it doesn't do this', so think of this as stopping me arguing so that it's clear what you're trying to do and that you've considered and rejected other things18:16
*** CaptTofu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** meow-nofer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
ijwPoint about use cases is that you can say: 'here's a use case... and we aren't trying to do it'18:17
*** tdink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** rm_work|away has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck18:17
Sukhdevijw: I think the spec covers as to what we are trying to solve18:17
*** rm_work|away is now known as rm_work18:17
*** rm_work has quit IRC18:17
*** rm_work has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
armaxijw: nothing is definite, obviously18:17
Sukhdevijw: it does not go into what we are not trying to cover18:17
*** satish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** erw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
ijwSukhdev: which is only fair, which is why I say wiki18:18
*** edleafe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
armaxijw: there is always some degree of manouvre18:18
ijwSukhdev: you did say that 'anyone who's interested in any sort of L2 GW should show up here'.  I'm making the point that that spec is not the sum total of what we need18:18
armaxijw: I’d rather keep things in one place, to avoid the potential of getting things to become stale or outdated in one place18:18
*** cyeoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
Sukhdevijw: If  I may, we can take two step process -18:19
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:19
Sukhdevijw: 1) to kick off a wiki, like you suggest to jot down the use cases etc., and18:19
Sukhdev2) We proceed with what we have in terms of the progress on the API at hand18:20
armaxijw: anyone who is familiar or paid attention to l2gw related efforts in Neutron should have an idea to what this is about by now :)18:20
ijwSukhdev: that's exactly what I was trying to get at - if we're all good with that18:20
Sukhdevijw: Both efforts can go simultaneously18:20
*** satish has quit IRC18:20
ijwarmax: I can find year old speds that define L2GW differently, so it's really not as clear-cut as you're making out18:20
Sukhdevijw: The question is how should we spend next few months to get something done in Kilo cycle18:21
armaxijw: ok18:21
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
Sukhdevijw - I think we do not want to get hung up on the exact definition of l2-gw18:22
ijwSukhdev: your spec's really the only one that's close enough for that to happen, though I can't say I'm desperately enamoured of it18:22
armaxultimately everything bubbles up to an API18:22
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC18:22
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
Sukhdevijw: may be as you see more of it - you might change your openion :-)18:23
armaxan API can evolve to accommodate use case18:23
ijwSukhdev: but on the other hand as a separate project and with a well-defined interface to core Neutron I don't think that matters so much - you can try it and we can learn from it if it isn't right18:23
armaxs18:23
armaxone API that came out of the various efforts is the one that Maruti put together18:23
Sukhdevijw: agree - that is why armax, I and others thought - lets move forward with what we have18:24
ijwarmax: I would prefer that we had a more logical framework around attaching external L2 domains to a cloud, rather than make an API that's VLAN specific, and one that's MPLS specific.  That's where my interest comes from here18:24
armaxThe intention of the people who kickstarted this project was to get that API to stage where we have some working code underpinning it18:24
ijwarmax: And evolving a VLAN-specific API is unlikely to get us there, I think18:24
armaxijw: I don’t want to do that18:24
Sukhdevijw: I think the use of VLAN may be confusing the issue - there is already a comment on the spec to change it18:25
armaxthis is not what this effort is about18:25
ijwarmax: or a device-specific API, for that matter (as in, one that assumes that devices must be recorded in the DB before anything happens)18:26
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
armaxthe reference to VLAN in the spec was to fix ideas, and to give us something concrete that we can bridge against, a use case if you will18:27
*** teran has quit IRC18:27
*** annashen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** irenab has quit IRC18:27
armaxijw: if you feel that this API would not lead you to support MPLS, or weasels, or whatnot, this is probably not the right project18:28
ijwLook, I want this to work, I'm not trying to block things, I'm just laying my concerns out.  If we're all happy I like the plan that we clarify the spec we have an lay out the use cases that involve L2 'gateways' of all flavours and types and the reasons why we might want them, in parallel, and we can work from there.  Hopefully we'll have a wider audience than the three of us next time to see how that's worked out (I know K18:28
ijwevin is interested, for starters)18:28
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** beagles is now known as beagles_brb18:28
*** EmilienM|afk is now known as EmilienM18:28
armaxijw: I don’t think that we are gonna be able to encompass all the possible use cases under a single umbrella18:28
armaxwe tried and failed18:28
Sukhdevarmax, ijw : Like I suggested earlier - we can kick of a separate effort to cover the use cases, but, I rather use this meeting to make progress on the API at hand - and see how can this evolve over time to cover more use cases18:28
armaxso at this point, I think we should realistically acknowledge that we need to agree to disagree and move separate ways18:29
ijwarmax: think of it more as laying out our strategy18:29
ijwarmax: not solving everything with a single spec, which as you rightly say is not going to work, but making sure that when the other stuff comes along it complements this18:29
*** cbouch has quit IRC18:29
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_18:30
Sukhdevijw: If we define the API correctly, I am sure we can come up with the extensions/enhancements that should be able to handle additional use cases18:30
ijwarmax: (and, conversely, making sure that when someone comes along with the wrong idea of what this spec should be solving they can be referred to the wiki, which will hopefully explain that there's space for someone else to come along and fix the problem they have which is not the problem at hand)18:31
armaxI know that you’re not here to block things :)  and I realize that the effort laid out here might not necessarily fit with what you have in mind, but at one point we gotta draw the line; we tried to be as clear as possible as to what this type of L2GW is about18:31
*** achanda has quit IRC18:31
ijwarmax, Sukhdev: you are now effectively arguing opposite sides of the coin ;)18:31
*** jroll has quit IRC18:31
*** jroll has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
dougwig(you have a wider audience now, it's just lurking, fyi.)18:32
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC18:32
SukhdevThe worry I have is if we try to chew too much, we risk choking and come up with nothing18:32
armaxijw: not sure I understand18:32
*** irenab has quit IRC18:32
ijwSo: we agree that we're looking for a pragmatic subset of what to do, right?  We agree that this spec looks like it's going to work as that.  I'm saying we just put the documentation in place to make that clear18:32
ijw(and not in the spec, because it doesn't belong in a spec)18:32
armaxijw: ok, what is the format that you propose?18:33
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
armaxor that you think would be a better fit to clarying the confusion?18:33
*** amcrn has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
Sukhdevijw: I agreed with your point, and hence suggested, we kick off a separate task to create a wiki with the use cases - perhaps that effort can be out of the scope for this meeting for the time being18:34
ijwarmax: So, as I said - we start a wiki page, we list the use cases, we then explain what we are doing with this specific spec to solve some of those use cases, and when everyone else comes along with their other requirements they document those and list their specs there too18:34
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:34
armaxijw: ok, I can have a stub at that18:35
Sukhdevijw: Do I hear a volunteer to put together that wiki? I can help...18:35
ijwI'm happy to join in: start it off and mail me18:35
ijwI'll stick in a few more bits18:35
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
armaxijw: :)18:35
ijwThey will not be what this spec addresses, which is, I think, the point ;)18:35
Sukhdevijw: OK - looks like we are converging :-)18:35
armaxas I said, I don’t want to boil the ocean right now18:35
ijwRight, so we're good.  Sukhdev, that aside, would you define your terms in the spec somewhere near the top, maybe ;)18:35
ijwarmax: yup, that's fine18:36
Sukhdev#action: ijw and Sukhdev to work on a wiki to list all the use cases under the L2-GW umbrella18:36
armaxand I also don’t want to go in never ending arguments18:36
ijwarmax: I'm effectively saying that if we write stuff down that we are explicitly not doing at this moment in time, we will not spend another half hour explaining it to each other ;)18:36
Sukhdevijw: I just assigned you a task - hope you are OK with it18:36
ijwyup, fine18:37
SukhdevOK - cool - lets move on then folks18:37
armaxwell, my point is that the use cases you’re after initially are not the ones we’re after18:37
ijwarmax: I know18:37
armaxso I am not sure ijw is the one that’s best tasked with this initial wiki documentation18:37
ijwarmax: let's stop with this bit and I'll chat with you in #openstack-neutron later18:38
armaxijw: sure18:38
Sukhdevarmax: the idea is to put the wiki for the completeness sake and then folks can decide how much effort they are willing to chip in to implement those18:38
armaxSukhdev: ok, sure let18:38
ijwWhich, for what it's worth, may even be in different stackforge projects18:38
armaxlet’s have a stab at this collaboratively18:39
ijwarmax: the point is to have something to point at to make them understand they're not what we're doing right this instant.18:39
armaxijw: indeed, we can have an overarching wiki page that list all the l2gw flavors we can come up with18:39
ijwK.18:39
ijwSukhdev: what else did you want to discuss?18:40
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC18:40
Sukhdevijw: We want to cover the API which we have so far -18:40
*** satish has quit IRC18:40
marutiWe have basic code (patchsets) that have been submitted.18:40
SukhdevI want maruti and armax  to take the stage and bring everybody in sync with what we have18:40
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
Sukhdevmaruti: how have you tested it?18:41
*** GheRivero has quit IRC18:41
marutiYes18:41
armaxSukhdev: as I mentioned the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144173/ has gone through a number of iterations18:41
marutiSukhdev: we have tested it using REST APIs.18:42
ijwmaruti: presumably the implementation was ML2/OVS?18:43
ijw(not looked at the patchsets, sorry)18:43
armaxto some, this looks like the one that the Nicira implemented for the NVP plugin18:43
armaxijw: well, the architecture being chosen is via service plugins18:44
*** satish_ has quit IRC18:44
marutiservice plugin (not ML2 plugin)18:44
Sukhdevarmax: correct - that is exactly what we discussed in Paris Summit18:44
armaxso in theory this can integrate with ML2/OVS or others, but we’ll work ML2/OVS is the initial choice18:44
ijwarmax: I admit my ignorance but I've not seen a good explanation of how service plugins work - is there a reference I should be reading?18:45
armaxum…the code? :)18:45
armaxijw: sorry I don’t have a better answer right now18:45
ijwarmax: so helpful ;)  - that's fine, but any specific files?18:45
Sukhdevijw: /neutron/neutron/services18:46
ijwta18:46
armaxum…https://github.com/openstack/neutron/tree/master/neutron/services18:46
marutiijw: you may look at FwaaS, or VPNaaS or LBaaS code18:46
armaxthat’s the entry point for a bunch of the services related stuff18:46
Sukhdevijw: L3Router, Lbaas, Fwaas, etc. they all use this model18:47
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC18:47
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
armaxa service plugin is the underpinning block that would allow us to integrate loosely with Neutron core right now18:48
armaxand that would let us experiment with the API18:48
Sukhdevmaruti: I will ping you off-line to seek some help/advise to get me going with your patch - I want to pull it and start to play with it and see if I can make it work with Arista HA18:48
Sukhdev*HW18:48
ijwgot a link to the patches?18:49
armaxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/networking-l2gw,n,z18:49
*** catherine_d|1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
marutihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/144097/18:49
armaxthat’s what I can see so far18:49
marutithanks armax18:50
selva_armax : I have a question related to extensions file placement in the advance services repo18:50
*** beagles_brb is now known as beagles18:50
selva_looks like extensions files are kept  in neutron repo18:50
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC18:51
armaxselva_: extensions can be added elsewhere18:51
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
armaxyou can look at this project for an example: https://github.com/stackforge/group-based-policy/tree/master/gbpservice/neutron/extensions18:51
ijwSo just for a bit of architectural clarification, you're talking to the OVSDBs directly from the L2GW code in parallel to the OVS agents?18:51
selva_ok . Can I add in the stackforge itself ? I want everyone to review once I have updated it18:52
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
selva_thanks armax18:52
marutiOVSDB here is different server (2.3.x) that supports hardware_vtep schema - that is one implementation of the APIs.18:53
armaxthe initial implementation that maruti has been working on is about talking to OVSDB on a physical switch18:53
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
Sukhdevarmax, selva_ : extensions should go where the API will live, no?18:53
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC18:53
*** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
marutiOVS agents communicate with OVSDB db on CN/NNs18:53
armaxijw: but we need some volunteer for the implementation that relies purely on a software node18:53
*** satish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
armaxSukhdev: right18:54
*** satish has quit IRC18:54
ijwmaruti: ok, that makes sense, thanks18:54
* ijw had a different mental picture, everything fits into place a lot better with that comment18:54
Sukhdevijw: LIke I said, once you understand it better, you may start to like it :-):-)18:55
* Sukhdev 5 min left18:55
ijwSukhdev: you optimist, you ;)18:55
maruti:)18:55
*** kashyap_bbiab is now known as kashyap18:56
SukhdevFolks, we are close to the end of time - I want to ask a question18:56
armaxSukhdev: so maybe we should recap18:56
ijwI've run out of annoying arguments now, I think18:56
armaxijw: nah, you’re good :)18:56
SukhdevDo you believe we should meet more often or every other week?18:56
armaxI think a forthnight is fine, but we always hang out on the channel so that shouldn’t stop us from talking ad hoc18:57
Sukhdevarmax: sounds good -18:57
SukhdevNow to recap -18:57
ijwGenerally two weeks, but I'd have one next week as a special occasion18:58
*** tonytan_brb is now known as tonytan4ever18:58
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
armaxijw: makes sens18:58
armaxe18:58
ijwThis went out late and it looks like we won't be bored next week18:58
SukhdevWe have an action item - for ijw and Sukhdev  to put together a wiki - to cover use case for L2-GW18:58
Sukhdev2) We all agree with the direction we are heading into18:58
*** vcxsd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
armaxSukhdev: feel free to ping me on this, I’d be happy to help18:59
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
Sukhdevarmax: I will - wanted to keep you out of this so that you can concentrate with maruti to get the API going18:59
*** Riddhi has quit IRC19:00
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
armaxSukhdev: right, the other aspect is that I’ll work with maruti and selva_ and others to whip the code into shape19:00
Sukhdev3) team's goal is to have the API working before the end of Kilo cycle19:00
marutiyes19:01
Sukhdevarmax: correct, I think your time will be well spent working with maruti, selva_ and others to get this API tested and put into better shape19:01
SukhdevAnything - I missed?19:01
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
ijwAnd I think we're clear I don't want what you want, but I'm happy on doc tasks and keeping a reviewing eye out19:02
ijwYou'll just have to tell me to shut up if I'm in the wrong19:02
armaxijw: there’s no right or wrong here19:02
*** sslypushenko__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
armaxjust different :)19:02
Sukhdevijw: I think we will turn you around - just wait and watch :-):-)19:02
armaxI think we overrun19:03
ijwarmax: yes, but I'll get in the way if I'm extending the scope beyond a certain point, so just push back and I'll document things up19:03
armaxno-one kicked us out yet19:03
SukhdevOK - folks thanks for attending19:03
marutiAre we meeting next week?19:03
Sukhdev#endmeeting19:03
ijwyes19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:03
openstackMeeting ended Mon Jan  5 19:03:22 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:03
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_l2gw/2015/networking_l2gw.2015-01-05-18.02.html19:03
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_l2gw/2015/networking_l2gw.2015-01-05-18.02.txt19:03
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_l2gw/2015/networking_l2gw.2015-01-05-18.02.log.html19:03
*** selva_ has quit IRC19:03
marutiok19:03
armaxijw: understood19:03
zehiclemeeting start Refstack19:03
SukhdevI thought we are meeting every other week19:04
zehicle#startmeeting Refstack19:04
openstackMeeting started Mon Jan  5 19:04:06 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zehicle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:04
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:04
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'19:04
catherine_d|1o/19:04
sslypushenko__Hi to all! o/19:04
catherine_d|1Happy New Year to all!19:04
sslypushenko__You to!19:05
* sarob lurking19:05
hogepodgeo/19:05
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** moshele has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
zehiclewe've got a lot to talk about since there's a f2f next week19:06
zehicleagenda items: f2f agenda and logistics, API spec & updates19:07
catherine_d|1yep .. Perhaps we should plan on the agenda19:07
hogepodge+1 to agenda19:07
zehiclegerrit backlog,  capabilities lists19:07
zehicleI'm not going to be there, who wants to lead the discussion about agenda?  starting w/ start/end times19:07
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
catherine_d|1We need Rocky ...19:08
hogepodgeThe scheduled dates are January 12-1419:08
* zehicle texting Rocky to see if she's online19:09
zehicle#topic face to face meeting19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "face to face meeting (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:10
zehiclesorry, not a good moderator :P19:10
*** sarob has quit IRC19:10
hogepodgeThat's three days. From what I gather Huawei is providing space and lunch through Rocky.19:10
hogepodgeLocation address is 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 9505019:10
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:11
zehicleStart/end times?19:11
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck19:11
hogepodgeI was assuming 9-5, but travel and work times may differ. My flight leaves San Jose at 7:00 pm Wednesday, so I won't be able to get a full day in. However, it would make sense to split our time up into six blocks19:12
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
hogepodgemorning/afternoon each day.19:12
hogepodgeAnyone else have any thoughts on that?19:13
zehicleso 10am to 6pm?19:13
catherine_d|1That is good for me ...19:13
zehiclethat means there are 6 blocks of time to schedule19:14
hogepodgeI'd like at least two devoted to hacking and dev work. Try to advance things in person with the end goal of having a fully working client/server.19:15
hogepodgeAt least one needs to be planning future work. API additions and plans.19:15
zehicleI'd put those in the middle19:15
zehicleMaybe Tues AM & Wed AM?19:16
*** maruti has quit IRC19:16
hogepodgeI think that's a good idea.19:16
catherine_d|1Are we going to have working session that actually will work on code to get a few API up and running?19:16
catherine_d|1or just planning session?19:17
zehicledo we have an etherpad for this yet?19:17
hogepodgecatherine_d|1 yes, I'd like to have that. I don't want to leave without a working system that can collect results.19:17
catherine_d|1hogepodge: +119:17
catherine_d|1at least have a couple working ...19:17
hogepodgehttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-january-2015-midcycle19:17
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
catherine_d|1to set the framework at least19:18
rockygO/19:18
catherine_d|1Hello rockyg:19:19
hogepodgeI'd also like a session for UUID hacking. Move the implementation of the spec forward (and spend the week getting the qa team to review the spec in advance)19:19
catherine_d|1is 10:00 to 6:00 sounds good?19:19
hogepodge(by spend the week I mean this week)19:20
rockygHi.might get dropped.On I 519:20
hogepodgeExcept for Wednesday that's fine by me. I actually prefer an earlier start, but I realize that others may have travel concerns from around the region.19:20
hogepodgeOf course, rockyg is the ultimate authority on space availability :-)19:21
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
rockygLots of space.but traffic is a bear here.19:22
zehicleI've been updating the page.... but since I'm not going to be in person, it needs review19:22
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
hogepodgeI'd also like a session on project organization. Try to set up a framework for regularizing the meetings, setting agendas ahead of time, and working on goals and project timelines.19:22
zehicleearlier will be better for SergeyLukjanov and I19:22
zehiclesorry sslypushenko__ and I19:23
rockygWe could schedule docs/help sprints early and give time to coders to get to the show.19:23
hogepodgeMaybe Monday morning for that?19:23
rockygS/show/site19:23
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
rockygWorks for me19:25
zehicleok, adjusting19:25
rockygDon't know if this was covered....could probably get a session with some infra folks local.Monty and maybe j Blair19:26
zehicledavidlenwell, said that we'd have the API working by then19:26
zehiclegetting infra and/or QA engaged would be great19:26
zehicleanything formal in the evening?19:27
*** teran has quit IRC19:27
rockygLet's let David Lenwell and me work the Infras19:28
catherine_d|1On the Tuesday coding ... is that for API or UUID?19:28
zehicleAPI is top prority19:28
catherine_d|1zehicle: ++119:28
zehicleso, UUID only if the API work is moving19:28
hogepodgeyes. We already have some uuid code from sslypushenko in progress19:29
zehicleother discussion for agenda?19:29
hogepodgeDinner on Tuesday night?19:30
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
hogepodgeMonday night works too.19:30
rockygLet's see what day we can get infra19:30
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
zehicleI added places for RSVPs so you can get a head count19:31
zehicle#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-january-2015-midcycle19:31
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:31
rockygThanks19:32
zehiclenext topic?19:32
zehicle#topic API spec & updates19:33
*** openstack changes topic to "API spec & updates (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:33
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC19:33
*** ijw has quit IRC19:33
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
zehicleDavid and I talked on Friday about this.  I suggested that we could decouple how we store the results from the API for the very short term19:34
zehicleso some of the DB schema items could be deferred to unblock actually getting the API in use19:34
hogepodgeSure.19:34
zehiclethat does NOT mean they are not import, I'm trying to work out an MVP that let's us start external testing of the refstack client19:34
*** tsv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
sslypushenko__I'm planning to propose new DB schema with will be universal19:35
zehicledouble negative - storing results is important19:35
hogepodgeI'd like us to consider building on the sql tools that the tempest team have built out for reporting and possibly storage.19:35
*** rbrady-lunch is now known as rbrady19:35
hogepodgeqa and infra have a solid interest in storing and managing results based on their needs. It feels right to build on their work.19:36
sslypushenko__I think I will do it my tomorrow. So anybody can review it19:36
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
hogepodgesslypushenko__ are you planning on going nosql?19:36
sslypushenko__No19:36
hogepodge+1 :-)19:37
rockygCool19:37
sslypushenko__It will slow down our development process19:37
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:37
zehiclehogepodge, that could be interesting.  I'd want to hear more about their use cases19:37
sslypushenko__Just an extension for David's proposal19:38
*** satish_ has quit IRC19:38
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
*** pradk is now known as prad-afk19:39
zehiclewhere do we stand w/ the API right now?19:39
sslypushenko__I'm planning to land DB schema and connect DB to API prototype19:41
zehicleok19:41
sslypushenko__It is real to get demo version to the next Monday19:41
zehicleseems like we have API spec and code in process.  no blocks on reviews19:42
zehicledavidlenwell, said that he would be getting something up there too.19:42
sslypushenko__It will be good if this patch will be landed as soon as possible https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144602/19:42
zehicleso, we should expect that API will be usable for f2f meeting19:42
sslypushenko__<zehicle> Hope so)19:43
zehicle#topic UUID19:44
*** openstack changes topic to "UUID (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:44
*** alazarev_ has quit IRC19:44
zehiclewe need reviews of the UUID spec19:44
zehicleI am, reluctantly, giving up on human readable UUIDs19:45
*** baoli_ has quit IRC19:45
zehicleso I'm not blocking.  We will need to have code that does translations from LONGUUIDs into things that people can understand19:45
hogepodgezehicle I'm not opposed to human readable uuids. I just don't know how to design it.19:45
rockygDo we have any qa reviews yet?19:46
zehiclehogepodge, the QA & Infra teams are19:46
zehiclethey don't want to deal w/ collision issues19:46
sslypushenko__<hogepodge> +119:46
zehicleso, it's a non-starter19:46
zehiclerockyg, I think they would be more eager if we showed our team was aligned on it19:46
* zehicle reserves the right to say I told you so when people complain about the capability JSON files19:47
catherine_d|1Did we have an UUID spec written after Paris?19:47
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
zehicle#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144329/2/specs/meta-data-and-uuid-for-tests.rst19:47
zehicleplease review and comment19:48
zehicleother gerrit/review topics before I move on?19:49
*** satish has quit IRC19:49
hogepodgeI dropped the link to the qa team too and asked for some reviews so we can iterate on it.19:49
zehiclehogepodge, thanks.  we need their support to move this ahead.19:49
zehicle#topic defcore capabilities files19:50
*** openstack changes topic to "defcore capabilities files (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:50
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
zehiclebefore Julia left, she submitted updates to both Icehouse & Juno capabilities files19:50
zehiclethese are PRELIMINARY for discussion and I'd like to move them forward19:50
zehiclebut wanted catherine_d|1 to review and +119:51
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:51
zehiclehogepodge, and I were talking last week and we'd like to see if DefCore can work BOTH lists in parallel19:51
catherine_d|1zehicle: I will review them ...19:51
zehicledoes not impact refstack directly, but wanted to keep you all in the loop19:51
rockygZehicle. +119:52
zehiclewe're making contingency plans for DefCore so vendors can self-certify without Refstack19:52
zehicleideally, the API progress makes that a non-issue19:52
*** dprince has quit IRC19:52
hogepodge#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136314/19:52
hogepodge#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131187/19:52
zehicleeither way, we really need to have those files for community review in early March19:52
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
zehiclequestions or comments?19:53
zehiclesince leadership on DefCore may change after mid-January, I'm trying to get this setup in a good place.19:54
*** baoli has quit IRC19:54
* zehicle means that he may not get re-elected to the Board and would not be leading DefCore 19:54
sarobwe need the json files out there so operators at the various companies that will be19:54
sarobtesting and reporting to mgmt on refstack impact to their distro19:55
zehiclesarob, +1.  hogepodge is going to help run the scoring/feedback sessions starting ASAP19:55
sarobso getting a version out there is important19:55
sarobeven if flawed19:55
rockygSo maybe we should also try to get a session at the  ops meet up19:55
zehicleaccording to Van L, there are places that need to be addressed19:55
sarobrockyg most def19:56
*** sergef has quit IRC19:56
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
sarobim aiming to have it as one of the main topics for the pm midcycle19:56
zehiclerockyg, +`1.  hogepodge can you coordiate w/ Tom F?19:56
rockygMid March19:56
hogepodgezehicle yes.19:56
rockygI think I'll be there19:56
sarobi will as well19:56
zehiclesarob, that would be excellent19:56
*** ijw_ has quit IRC19:57
*** HeOS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
zehicle# other topics?19:57
zehicle#topic other items19:57
*** openstack changes topic to "other items (Meeting topic: Refstack)"19:57
* zehicle reminds everyone that EVERY VOTE will count for the Bylaws changes. We need to get a quorum to pass anything!19:58
sarobroger roger19:58
*** rba_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
rockygWhen will vote mail come out19:59
zehiclelet's make sure to say on top of reviews leading into the F2F.19:59
zehiclerockyg, 1/1219:59
rockygThanks19:59
hogepodgeOh, add that to the agenda. Time for us to vote during the meetup.19:59
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
zehicleGold member elections should be this week.  can you confirm sarob ?19:59
sarobumm20:00
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
sarobi think next week20:00
zehicledone20:00
zehiclehas to be before the general elections20:00
*** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
zehicle"January 7: Gold Member Director Selector Election (1 day)"20:00
* redrobot checks the time... ;)20:01
hogepodgeOperators meetup. Mar 9-10, 2015, Philadelphia, USA20:01
zehicle#endmeetign20:01
zehicle#endmeeting20:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:01
openstackMeeting ended Mon Jan  5 20:01:25 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-01-05-19.04.html20:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-01-05-19.04.txt20:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2015/refstack.2015-01-05-19.04.log.html20:01
SheenaG1o/20:01
SheenaG1I'm here!!!20:01
*** alazarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
jaosorior:O/20:01
woodster_o/20:01
redrobot#startmeeting barbican20:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Jan  5 20:01:55 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:01
*** Haiying has quit IRC20:01
*** sslypushenko__ has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'barbican'20:01
tsvo/20:02
redrobotHappy New Year everyone!20:02
greghaynesO/20:02
tkelseyo/20:02
elmiko\o/20:02
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
jaosoriorHappy new year and stuff! :D20:02
rellerrellero/20:02
redrobotFeels good to come back from vacation. :)20:02
*** hyakuhei_web has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** dstufft has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** rba_ has quit IRC20:02
*** vcxsd has quit IRC20:02
dave-mccowano/20:02
*** hyakuhei_web has quit IRC20:02
*** hyakuhei_web has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** hyakuhei_web has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
woodster_o/20:03
woodster_Happy new baby rellerreller!20:03
rellerrellerThanks!20:03
jvrbanacu/20:03
redrobotLots of barbicaneers here today!  ...  Much better than last week. :)20:03
*** catherine_d|1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
redrobotYeah!  Congratulations rellerreller !!20:03
*** alee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:03
redrobotAlso I want to give a shout out to chellygel (even though she isn't here) for taking over meeting duties while I was away20:04
elmiko+120:04
redrobotok, let's get this party started20:04
redrobotas usual the agenda can be found here:20:04
redrobot#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican20:05
redrobot#topic Kilo Milestone 1 released20:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Kilo Milestone 1 released (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:05
*** hyakuhei_web has quit IRC20:05
redrobotKilo-1 was released by Thierry right before Christmas20:05
redrobot#link https://launchpad.net/barbican/kilo/kilo-120:05
redrobotmany thanks to everyone who made the release possible!20:06
redrobotAny questions/comments about Kilo-1 ?20:06
*** hyakuhei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:06
jaosoriornoup20:07
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
redrobotJust as a heads up, we have exactly one month before Kilo-2 is due20:07
redrobot#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Kilo_Release_Schedule20:07
*** pvaneck has quit IRC20:07
redrobotok, moving on20:07
redrobot#topic Quota Blueprint20:08
redrobot#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/quota-support-on-barbican-resources20:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Quota Blueprint (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:08
redrobot#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132091/20:08
redrobotwoodster_ do you want to talk about this BP?20:08
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:08
redrobotI thought I saw tsv raise a hand earlier20:09
tsvredrobot, woodster, Juan added a comment to my spec to use the oslo common quota implementation20:09
woodster_tsv, awesome!20:09
tsvi looked at that one and it seems very much usable. it also has user+project level support. do we need user level quota support ?20:10
woodster_tsv, do you think you'll have cycles to work on that bp for Kilo?20:10
hyakuhei_Per project quota can be tricky when you have no way to ensure the number of projects that can be created by one $bad_guy. I think te proposal makes sense to stop accidental resource consumption though20:10
tsvyes. sorry about the delay last year. am now back to work on it20:10
*** satish has quit IRC20:10
woodster_I'm thinking project vs user level is also related to the per-secret RBAC blueprint work20:11
tsvhyakuhei_, thanks. that makes sense. so we have project, user and class level quotas20:11
woodster_maybe not...seems we can keep those concerns separate20:11
tsvok20:11
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC20:12
tsvi am now checking if the config entries I put in the spec is covered by the oslo common code. if not, those needs to be added by an extension20:13
redrobotdoes this BP need to be re-written to reflect Oslo-quota usage?20:13
tsvredrobot, yes. i got to do that yet20:13
redrobottsv ok20:13
redrobot#action tsv to update Quota BP to use oslo quota20:14
redrobotany other questions/comments about this BP?20:15
tsvredrobot, not from me20:15
redrobotok, moving on...20:15
redrobot#topic Bug 137646920:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Bug 1376469 (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:15
aleeso just to confirm, this BP only relates to project quotas?20:15
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1376469 in barbican "Creating a "key" type order without a name set in "meta" produces a null when retrieved" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/137646920:15
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC20:16
tsvalee, yes. project and project+class level quotas20:16
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:16
jaosoriorYeah, even though it's low prio, just stumbled upon that bug and wanted to get some input before doing anything20:16
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:16
aleetsv, ok thanks20:16
woodster_I'm agreeing with jaosorior that secret name should be optional, and not auto-filled out by Barbican with a UUID or what not20:17
redrobotSo the open question is, should auto-populating the name with the secret UUID be removed?  And if so, what should the default value be when the name is not provided?20:18
jaosoriorbasically for both secrets and Containers, if the name is left empty, when retrieving it the UUID is shown... yet, in reality the name is actually empty in the database20:18
jaosoriorso what happens is that if someone tries to use that UUID to query for the entity, it will not work20:18
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC20:18
redrobotI'm in favor of removing the logic that assings the UUID to the name.  I think an empty string would be a sensible default (as opposed to a null value)20:18
jaosoriorso I would like to get rid of this fake auto-population20:18
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC20:19
aleejaosorior, sounds good to me.20:19
elmikoempty string seems reasonable, especially if the db entry is empty20:19
rellerrellerWhat are the properties of a name? Does a name have any uniqueness properties?20:19
jaosorioralright, so what could be done is to have an empty string as a default value, and change the model to be non-nullable20:19
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
aleejaosorior, why do we even want an empty string?  why can't it be null?20:20
jaosoriorwait up, gotta recheck20:20
woodster_So if not specified, the name is an empty string? So when that secret meta is retrieved, a 'name' attribute would be returned even if not specified in the original secret?20:20
jaosoriorwhy would we want to check for nulls if null semantically represents the same as an empty string20:20
woodster_I'm preferring not to return fields that are optional and not specified originally20:21
jaosoriorthe name is not an empty string, it would end up as null20:21
rellerrellerNull and empty string are not the same to me. Null mean no user input. Empty string may or may not have been set by user.20:21
redrobotwoodster_ I would prefer to return a standard response, than to selectively return different responses depending on what was populated20:22
redrobotno reason why it couldn't be Null... I'm just not a fan of null values.20:22
aleerellerreller, exactly -- which is why I would prefer null.20:22
aleeif user specifies nothing20:22
aleeredrobot, I'd prefer not to output anything if the user specified nothing20:22
jaosorioralee, rellerreller: I see your point, but what20:23
jaosoriorwhat's the added value in having that? It would end up in some extra checks20:23
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
jaosorioras opposed as having it simplified by not having null values20:23
woodster_rellerreller, I agree when the fields are part of some standard form/template, but metadata about a secret is more user customizable in my mind20:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
rellerrellerIt only matters if someone cares if a value has been set or not.20:24
woodster_well, if folks are ok with seeing 'name': '' returned for secret metadata always, even if the 'name' wasn't originally supplied, that is ok with me.20:24
aleecan I search for secrets with name = "" ?20:24
rellerrellerIt does not matter much to me either way. I was just stating that to me null and "" are not the same.20:25
redrobotwoodster_ it would say "name": null20:25
*** daneyon has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
rellerrellerWhy not set default name to UUID string?20:25
rellerrellerThat way names are more unique20:25
woodster_redrobot, in that case nulls all the way through would work...we'd jsut remove the bit of code that strips name if it is null when the secret model is returned to client20:26
jaosorioralee: yup20:26
jaosoriorat least list them20:26
aleeit doesn't matter much to me, but I do think that we should treat all optional fields in the same way.  What do we do for other optional fields?20:26
redrobotrellerreller the argument was that UUID can't be queried, so there's not much use to setting the name to be a UUID20:26
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
woodster_rellerreller, the name field is free form wrt clients...they could create all their secrets with same name or no name20:26
jaosoriorredrobot: Actually, the argument was that the UUID that was being displayed cannot be queried the way it is implemented now20:27
woodster_If we want UUID default, we'd need to populate that in the database as well so it could be queried20:27
jaosoriorI wouldn't mind having the UUID as a default value, as long as it's documented, and actually persisted in the database, which at the moment it's not20:27
rellerrellerI think if we are going to return a default value then that should be the value in the DB20:27
jaosoriorrellerreller: exactly20:27
rellerrellerOtherwise we may search for default values that are set20:28
rellerrellerbut not be able to find them.20:28
*** teran has quit IRC20:28
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
redrobotrellerreller I think we're all in agreement on that point20:28
jaosoriorwell... I guess we all agree that what we display to the user should be what's in the database20:28
elmikojaosorior: +120:29
redrobotyeah, the question then is, what should the default Name be when no name is provided by the user20:29
rellerrellerSo really the change will come in the put or post method?20:29
jaosoriornow, who's into the idea of returning null values?20:29
*** satish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
woodster_well, what is the purpose of the 'name' field anyway? Originally it was just an optional convenience info to add to a secret. If that is still the case, I'm favoring leaving it unspecified (null) if not provided by the client.20:29
redrobotoptions are 1) UUID, 2) Blank Name, 3) Null value20:29
aleeI vote 320:29
rellerreller+1 320:30
jaosoriorredrobot: thanks... that's actually more efficient than what I was doing20:30
woodster_I vote null, as it represents the absence of a selection...an opt-out if you will.20:30
jvrbanac1 or 320:30
woodster_+1 320:30
jaosorior220:30
jaosorioranybody else?20:30
dstufft+120:30
redrobotdstufft +1 to # ?20:30
woodster_dstufft +1 on 1? :)20:31
greghaynesJust a general +1 on the voting? :p20:31
dstufft3 sorry20:31
dstufftI'm also +1 on voting in general ;)20:31
jaosoriorOK, so I guess it's quite clear that 3 wins20:31
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC20:31
jaosoriorI'll upload a patch soon then20:31
redrobotjaosorior I was on board with #2 with you, but it seems we're outnumbered :)20:31
rellerrellerSo will optional values be returned or have a null value?20:31
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:31
woodster_I think we are also saying to always return 'name' in the returned metadata...so 'name': null would be possible20:31
*** sfineberg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
jaosoriorwoodster_: indeed20:32
woodster_I'm ok with that one...but we'll need to be consistent with other optional fields too20:32
jaosoriorwell, this sort of stuff could be filtered in the client20:32
redrobotyes, I would prefer that well defined fields (such as name in a secret) always be returned.  So "name": null should be returned for secrets where no name was provided20:32
woodster_+1 on that20:33
*** satish has quit IRC20:33
jvrbanacAm I the only one that feels like nulls coming back is a bit ugly20:33
aleewhat do we do with the other optonal values?20:33
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
jaosoriorjvrbanac: redrobot and me thought so too, but people have voted20:33
woodster_alee, we do suppress other optional fields...so those would need to change too20:33
aleewoodster_, I would suggest suppressing this one too20:34
elmikojvrbanac: seems a little ugly, but if the user requested nothing maybe it's the most appropriate20:34
dstufftnull is the absence of vlaue value20:34
woodster_jvrbanac, do you mean nulls coming back vs not returning an optional field if it is null?20:34
jaosoriorso I guess what would end up now is to always return the optional values, and if there's null it should say so20:34
aleetreat it like every other optional field20:34
aleeif there is no value, don't return anything20:34
* dstufft thinks option fields should always return null20:34
dstufftunless there is a value20:34
jvrbanacI normally wouldn't even present the value if it was null,20:35
redrobotalee what is the benefit of omitting fields?20:35
greghaynesAgreed with dstufft, if its optional it should be nullable, if you return empty string its effectively mandatory with a '' default which seems like an unecessary constraint20:35
aleeredrobot, whats the benefit of returning fields with null values?20:35
woodster_so just be clear, if the field is null, we are saying we want that field to be returned anyway, as 'field_name': null, correct?20:35
dstufftalee: it makes it easier to figure out when exploring the API what values can be returned20:36
redrobotalee It's easier to parse a secret, for example, if you know that all fields will always be present20:36
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza20:36
jaosoriorwoodster_: uh... that's what I had understood, but now I'm a bit confused20:36
jaosoriordstufft: +120:36
redrobotalee instead of having to check whether a field exists in the response for every optional field20:36
woodster_folks should be using barbican client anyway :)20:37
redrobotwoodster_ yes, I would like to see nulled fields in the responses.  alee would like to see them removed from the responses.20:37
jaosoriorI went ahead and set the bug as invalid, since we are now going for the null values20:38
jaosoriornow20:38
woodster_as long as there aren't a lot of optional fields returned (which we don't have now), I'm ok with that.20:38
dstufftI mena in python you'll just do a data.get("optional") or something, but still, it makes things nicer I think to hav enulled fields, there's no question about what can be returned, and you can use data["foo"[ instead of .get() which means if you accidently type data["ofo"] instead of data.get("ofo") you'll get an immediate error instead of silently not returning anything20:38
aleeredrobot, I'm open either way -- from an interface point of view, I think its cleaner to omit the nulls.20:38
jvrbanacI agree with alee, I think it's clean to omit as well20:39
jvrbanac^cleaner20:39
redrobotjvrbanac cleaner how?  It makes for uglier code when parsing the responses...20:39
jaosoriorOK, A) show all values, B) omit null values20:39
redrobot+1 A20:39
jaosorior+1 A20:39
dstufft+1 A20:40
jvrbanac+1 B20:40
elmiko+1 A20:40
alee+1 B20:40
greghaynes+1 A20:40
woodster_+1 A20:40
tsv+1 A20:40
redrobot+1000 Democracy :)20:40
jaosoriorThat was easy20:40
redrobotI think we've got this sorted out20:40
woodster_So....is this an API contract change? :)20:40
jaosoriorAlright, so I'll upload a CR with this change20:40
redrobotany other questions jaosorior ?20:40
aleejust curious but how does the client code handle if an optional field is ever removed?20:41
woodster_I think we've only documented example responses in our API docs so far...no verbiage about this behavior though20:41
redrobotwoodster_ I don't think so... the structure of the response does not change.20:41
redrobotalee I think removing a field would be a breaking change... would have to be dealt with accordingly.20:42
woodster_jaosorior, would that CR just focus on 'name', or apply to all secret meta fields?20:42
jaosoriorredrobot: not that I can think of. I guess now only thing I need to do is push some code :P20:42
jaosorioras far as I remember, name was the only one with the weird behaviour20:42
jaosoriorwhich is also the case for Containers20:42
jaosoriorbut I can check the rest of the fields, no problem20:43
aleeredrobot, just pointing out that not checking for the existence of an attribute in the client makes it more rigid20:43
aleeredrobot, you may ultimately have to check for attribute existence in any case.20:43
aleebut democracy has spoken ..20:43
redrobotalee noted20:43
*** annashen has quit IRC20:44
woodster_will this break any func tests? :)20:44
*** GheRivero has quit IRC20:45
redrobotwoodster_ I doubt it...  but I'm sure jaosorior would fix any breaking tests. :)20:46
redrobotok, moving on...20:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
jaosoriorwoodster_: I'm actually not sure, but if that's the case no biggie, would need to fix them anyway20:46
*** annashen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
woodster_sounds good, thanks20:46
redrobot#topic Blueprint Status20:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprint Status (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:46
redrobotwoodster_ I think you added this topic?20:47
*** baoli has quit IRC20:47
woodster_yep, just a general 'where are we at?' on those essential BP CRs20:47
redrobot#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican20:47
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
redrobotwe can go down the list I suppose?20:48
redrobotalee how is the common certificate API coming along?20:48
woodster_I think alee has been updating those, just more if folks have open questions to air out here. Otherwise we can continue to discuss in our IRC channel20:48
jaosoriorwoodster_: Actually, seems like null name is untested in the functional test, I'll add that20:48
rellerrellerOne not listed on there yet is the content type spec. I will have that out today or tomorrow.20:48
woodster_rellerreller, nice!20:49
aleeredrobot, well -- the blueprint for that is approved20:49
aleeredrobot, working on impl20:49
greghaynesI think the spec doesnt match impl at this point though, right?20:49
woodster_rellerreller, does that have a corresponding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican entry?20:49
rellerrellerwoodster_ I'm not sure20:50
aleegreghaynes, right -- I'll update once the second impl patch is merged20:50
rellerrellerIf not then it will be created today or tomorrow as well20:50
aleeredrobot, but from a bp point of view - its pretty much done right now.20:50
woodster_rellerreller, if not, we should add that one so we can set it's priority...maybe we could decide the priority now?20:50
redrobotalee thanks!20:51
aleeidentify-cas is approved, starting to working on impl patches20:51
redrobotLooks like there's only two BPs with Essential priority still in review...20:51
redrobot#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/add-per-secret-policy20:51
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC20:51
woodster_So could we vote on the priority to assign to rellerreller's BP? Or do we all think it is essential?20:51
aleeadd-per-secret-policy has a bunch of comments20:51
redrobot#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/add-worker-retry-update-support20:51
aleeI'm incorporating those and will have new version out today or tommorow20:51
redrobotwoodster_ I think the Content-Type BP is essential20:52
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_20:52
woodster_redrobot, sounds good.20:52
rellerrellerredrobot woodster_ I think essential as well since it could affect the secret stores and API20:53
aleeagreed20:53
*** GheRivero has quit IRC20:54
redrobotOk, we're running low on time for this week...20:54
redrobotany last minute questions/comments?20:54
elmikoyea, i'm curious about the origins of docs/src/wadl/Barbican.wadl20:54
woodster_redrobot, regarding the add-worker-retry BP...that one merged already. I'll add the link to the bp to LaunchPad20:54
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
elmikois that file hand hacked or auto-generated?20:55
redrobotelmiko hand-hacked by one of Rackspace's technical writers... but I don't think she's had much time to work on it lately20:55
elmikoredrobot: ok, no worries. i'm doing some work on creating a swagger ref for barbican. just doing some background research about the wadl.20:56
redrobotelmiko the API working group is interested in using something like Swagger to try to automate the WADL generation... but we're still figuring that out...20:56
elmikoheh ;)20:56
woodster_elmiko, I'll be taking a look at that along with the tech writer.20:56
redrobotelmiko are you working with the API WG folks?20:56
elmikoi have an auto-generator for sahara and i'm working one up for barb20:56
elmikoredrobot: yea20:56
woodster_elmiko, that sounds nice! I'd like to talk more about that after this meeting if you can20:57
elmikowoodster_: ok, maybe i could ping you if i get further along?20:57
elmikowoodster_: sure, #openstack-barbican?20:57
woodster_elmiko, please do, I'd appreciate that20:57
woodster_elmiko, yes that works20:57
*** dims has quit IRC20:57
elmikocool, that's all i had. thanks20:57
redrobotok, guys, thanks for coming out.  See y'all back here next week!20:58
redrobot#endmeeting20:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:58
openstackMeeting ended Mon Jan  5 20:58:14 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-01-05-20.01.html20:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-01-05-20.01.txt20:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2015/barbican.2015-01-05-20.01.log.html20:58
*** tkelsey has quit IRC20:59
*** elmiko has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** rwsu has quit IRC21:00
*** greghaynes has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** wbrothers has quit IRC21:04
*** kaitlin-farr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:12
*** zeddii is now known as zeddii_afk21:13
*** irenab has quit IRC21:14
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:18
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** irenab has quit IRC21:20
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:24
*** jehb_ has quit IRC21:26
*** teran has quit IRC21:29
*** annashen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** annashen has quit IRC21:29
*** GheRivero has quit IRC21:30
*** X019 has quit IRC21:33
*** pc_m has quit IRC21:36
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC21:37
*** gyee has quit IRC21:37
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:37
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
*** banix has quit IRC21:40
*** baoli has quit IRC21:40
*** kaitlin-farr has quit IRC21:41
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC21:42
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** ijw has quit IRC21:45
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC21:46
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:49
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:50
*** andreaf has quit IRC21:50
*** GheRivero has quit IRC21:53
*** thangp has quit IRC21:53
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC21:54
*** eghobo has quit IRC21:54
*** annashen_ has quit IRC21:55
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:57
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** SheenaG1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
*** daneyon has quit IRC22:02
*** betsy has quit IRC22:02
*** thomasem has quit IRC22:03
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:03
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:05
*** rellerreller has quit IRC22:07
*** annashen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** cbouch has quit IRC22:11
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC22:12
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith22:12
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:16
*** jgrimm is now known as zz_jgrimm22:16
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** GheRivero has quit IRC22:22
*** mattfarina has quit IRC22:24
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC22:24
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:25
*** thomnico has quit IRC22:26
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC22:27
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:27
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
*** miguelgrinberg has quit IRC22:31
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC22:31
*** teran has quit IRC22:31
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:33
*** eghobo has quit IRC22:34
*** miguelgrinberg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** hachao has quit IRC22:35
*** hachao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:36
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:40
*** X019 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** dstufft has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC22:45
*** X019 has quit IRC22:46
*** GheRivero has quit IRC22:54
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:55
*** alee is now known as alee_dinner22:56
*** Barker has quit IRC22:59
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC23:04
*** X019 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:05
*** bradjones has quit IRC23:06
*** dboik has quit IRC23:10
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:10
*** ijw has quit IRC23:11
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:13
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:16
*** dims__ has quit IRC23:17
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi23:17
*** Haiying has quit IRC23:18
*** dbhaskaran has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:22
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:22
*** GheRivero has quit IRC23:25
*** teran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:27
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:30
*** teran has quit IRC23:32
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC23:36
*** alazarev_ has quit IRC23:36
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:37
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC23:37
*** anna_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:37
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:39
*** X019 has quit IRC23:39
*** ajo has quit IRC23:39
*** satish_ has quit IRC23:41
*** AlanClark has quit IRC23:41
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC23:44
*** beagles has quit IRC23:47
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** prad-afk has quit IRC23:48
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:49
*** nshah has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:50
*** nshah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:50
*** nshah has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:50
*** Guest60568 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:53
*** HeOS has quit IRC23:55
*** andreykurilin has quit IRC23:57
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC23:57
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** anna_ is now known as X01923:59
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!