Thursday, 2014-03-13

*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:00
*** david_lyle_ has quit IRC00:00
*** vinod has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:04
*** lblanchard has quit IRC00:05
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk00:05
*** vinod has quit IRC00:10
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:11
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:13
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:17
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:17
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC00:17
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:19
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC00:21
*** IlyaE has quit IRC00:22
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:24
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:24
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:25
*** snackewm has quit IRC00:25
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:28
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:29
*** EmilienM has quit IRC00:30
*** sdague has quit IRC00:30
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:31
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:33
*** sankarshan_away has quit IRC00:33
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:34
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** sankarshan_away has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:36
*** arnaud has quit IRC00:39
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:40
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC00:44
*** zns has quit IRC00:47
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC00:50
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:50
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
*** briancline has quit IRC00:52
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** sarob has quit IRC00:53
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** alazarev has quit IRC00:54
*** julim has quit IRC00:56
*** esker has quit IRC00:56
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:57
*** samstav has quit IRC00:57
*** richm has quit IRC00:59
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:01
*** esker has quit IRC01:01
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC01:03
*** jjmb has quit IRC01:10
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:12
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:12
*** baoli has quit IRC01:12
*** caleb_` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:13
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:13
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:13
*** caleb_ has quit IRC01:15
*** michael-yu has quit IRC01:16
*** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady01:18
*** caleb_` has quit IRC01:19
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** hockeynut has quit IRC01:25
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:28
*** xuhanp has quit IRC01:28
*** fungi has quit IRC01:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:36
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:42
*** Barker has quit IRC01:42
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** vinod has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:51
*** baoli has quit IRC01:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:52
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:52
*** vinod has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:54
*** amcrn has quit IRC01:56
*** sarob has quit IRC01:56
*** khyati has quit IRC01:59
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** SushilKM has quit IRC02:04
*** rohit404 has quit IRC02:05
*** walker_ has quit IRC02:14
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:14
*** flwang has quit IRC02:23
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:25
*** arnaud has quit IRC02:26
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:31
*** SushilKM has quit IRC02:32
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:34
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:36
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting-alt02:36
*** NehaV has quit IRC02:37
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:37
*** baoli has quit IRC02:38
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:46
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC02:47
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC02:47
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:53
*** alazarev has quit IRC02:55
*** sarob has quit IRC02:56
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:00
*** rbrady is now known as rbrady-afk03:00
*** sarob has quit IRC03:01
*** sarob__ has quit IRC03:05
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:06
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan03:06
*** sarob has quit IRC03:10
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:21
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:29
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** jecarey has quit IRC03:36
*** alazarev has quit IRC03:40
*** sarob has quit IRC03:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:46
*** NehaV has quit IRC03:48
*** sarob has quit IRC03:51
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC03:51
*** banix has quit IRC03:53
*** ramashri has quit IRC03:55
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC03:58
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:03
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:03
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:04
*** Haiying has quit IRC04:11
*** esker has quit IRC04:15
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC04:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:16
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:20
*** alazarev has quit IRC04:24
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:24
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja04:24
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** zaneb has quit IRC04:27
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:39
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:47
*** samstav has quit IRC04:48
*** banix has quit IRC04:49
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:51
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:52
*** sarob has quit IRC04:53
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:54
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:55
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:55
*** samstav has quit IRC04:56
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** esker has quit IRC05:00
*** resker has quit IRC05:02
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:06
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:07
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC05:07
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:10
*** samstav has quit IRC05:36
*** zaneb has quit IRC05:39
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:39
*** samstav has quit IRC05:42
*** michael-yu has quit IRC05:42
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:45
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** gyee has quit IRC05:51
*** zns has quit IRC05:53
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away05:53
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:53
*** sarob has quit IRC05:54
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:56
*** samstav has quit IRC05:56
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:57
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:57
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:01
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC06:02
*** david-lyle has quit IRC06:02
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** samstav has quit IRC06:14
*** yamahata has quit IRC06:21
*** khyati has quit IRC06:22
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:27
*** samstav has quit IRC06:29
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:29
*** michael-yu has quit IRC06:30
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:37
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:41
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:49
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:51
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:53
*** ken1ohmichi has left #openstack-meeting-alt06:53
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt06:54
*** sarob has quit IRC06:56
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:01
*** alazarev has quit IRC07:01
*** sarob has quit IRC07:05
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:10
*** zns has quit IRC07:13
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:25
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC07:26
*** jtomasek has quit IRC07:32
*** nosnos has quit IRC07:32
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:32
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:40
*** IlyaE has quit IRC07:43
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC07:50
*** yamamoto_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt07:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:54
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** d0ugal has quit IRC07:58
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** sarob has quit IRC07:58
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:01
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:02
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:06
*** IlyaE has quit IRC08:11
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:12
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8708:13
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:25
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:49
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:51
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** sarob has quit IRC09:02
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC09:03
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:09
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC09:09
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:11
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC09:11
*** jrist has quit IRC09:11
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:21
*** flwang has quit IRC09:22
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:25
*** lucian1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC09:30
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:36
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:58
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:00
*** sarob has quit IRC10:02
*** luqas has quit IRC10:07
*** isviridov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:17
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC10:23
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:23
*** markwash_ has quit IRC10:25
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:28
*** dmakogon_ is now known as denis_makogon10:34
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:44
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC10:52
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:59
*** sarob has quit IRC11:05
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:08
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:13
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as johnthebpguy11:15
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:25
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:25
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:31
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:46
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:49
*** rbrady-afk is now known as rbrady11:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:01
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:01
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:02
*** sarob has quit IRC12:06
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** yamamoto has left #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** johnthebpguy has quit IRC12:09
*** nosnos has quit IRC12:15
*** robertmyers has quit IRC12:21
*** luqas has quit IRC12:27
*** nwidell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** pdmars has quit IRC12:43
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:47
*** isviridov has left #openstack-meeting-alt12:48
*** jcoufal has quit IRC12:50
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:51
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** jprovazn is now known as jprovazn_afk13:02
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** eankutse has quit IRC13:03
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
*** sarob has quit IRC13:08
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC13:11
*** nikhil__ is now known as nikhil|afk13:15
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** markwash has quit IRC13:20
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash13:20
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
*** rbrady has quit IRC13:37
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:38
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** scottda_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
markwashgood morning glance folks14:00
markwashor evening14:00
markwashor afternoon14:00
ameadehola14:00
rosmaitayo!14:00
ativelkovhi!14:00
flwango/14:00
arnaudo/14:00
flwangarnaud: congrats :D14:01
markwashokay cool let's start it14:01
arnaudthanks flwang :) :) :) :)14:01
markwash#startmeeting glance14:01
scottda_hi14:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 13 14:01:31 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'14:01
flwangarnaud: welcome to join the team, though you're already at here14:01
*** gtt116 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
markwashteam meeting agenda follows14:02
markwash#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda14:02
markwashbut there's not much there yet14:02
markwashI'll say a few quick project-y update things and then yield to other agenda items14:02
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
markwashas a warning, I need to leave at 45 past the hour14:03
markwashso, we are in feature freeze, as everyone knows14:03
markwashwe can still fix bugs or tweak tests14:03
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
markwashif there are any especially important bugs, please mark their priority accordingly and put them into the icehouse-rc114:04
markwashhttps://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-rc114:04
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
markwashthat's about it from me14:05
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC14:05
markwashwe have one agenda item otherwise so far14:05
markwash#topic vm template support14:05
*** openstack changes topic to "vm template support (Meeting topic: glance)"14:05
markwashwho will start us off on this topic?14:05
arnaudmarkwash: the deadline for rc1 is April 17th?14:05
zhiyanit's trying to figure out a way to make vm template support in glance, then nova could provision vm from it.14:06
arnaudor March 27th14:06
arnaudhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icehouse_Release_Schedule14:06
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
markwasharnaud: ideally march 27th but there is a window in there for rc2/rc3 as needed14:07
arnaudgot it14:07
markwashsorry zhiyan, go ahead14:07
zhiyanIMHO we can use existing location mechanism to implements it. i have wrote the whole design in the etherpad, like to know team's input/comments.14:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:09
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
*** NehaV has quit IRC14:10
markwashit seems similar to what was being discussed around artifacts -> server templates14:10
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
markwashI'm not sure I like putting more overloaded meanings into the existing image schema14:10
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
*** sarob has quit IRC14:10
arnaudI think the key point here is that for a template the location would redirect to a metadata file and not the actual image14:11
zhiyanprobably artifacts could cover this case, but iiuc, current it's not clear14:11
arnaudit is supposed to be the case for ovf in the current implementation, but afaik ovf is not used anywhere14:11
markwashoh, also I might be mistaken. . are VM templates a specific technology?14:11
zhiyanarnaud: yes, but as we discussed, if artifacts does not support >1 bulks, the similar limitation will be happened as well14:11
zhiyanyes, hypervisor specified14:12
arnaudmarkwash: vmware specific at this point14:12
arnaudthere is also for hyper-v14:12
arnaudfor sure14:12
arnaudbut it seems like it would be hard to find a representation that satisfies both14:13
markwashzhiyan: artifacts will definitely support >1 bulk data components I believe14:13
markwashit depends on the schema of the artifact type14:13
zhiyanmarkwash: ok. so do you think we should going to wait artifacts? and make template concept fit it?14:13
ativelkovby "bulk data components" you mean the binaries?14:13
markwashativelkov: yup14:14
ativelkovAs I see them - yes, they should14:14
flwangzhiyan: for short term, any known issue if we just leverage the multi location to implement the template?14:14
arnaudzhiyan: we could have VMwareTemplateArtifact, HyperVArtifact if both of them cannot be represented in 1 model14:14
markwashzhiyan: I think part of the motivation for artifacts is that its very hard to put all of these types of things in the same schema14:15
markwashdisk images, vm templates, etc14:15
ativelkovHowever, the exact amount of them should be defined by the particular plugin14:15
zhiyanmarkwash: arnaud, ativelkov: seems we need a clear doc to know its details14:15
markwashit should give us the opportunity to expand out from a single type of object, while simultaneously increasing the clarity around each type of object14:16
arnaud+114:16
zhiyanis there a doc to introduce artifacts current design/shape?14:17
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
ativelkovI am writing the API spec at apiary14:17
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:17
zhiyani'm ok if team like to go artifacts way.14:18
markwashso if we use locations for this, the idea is to have one location be the template metadata and other locations be any disk images that are needed?14:18
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
zhiyanmarkwash: no.14:19
flwangmarkwash: I think there is no disk image14:19
arnaudflwang: there is *-flat.vmdk14:19
zhiyanmarkwash: all the location point to metadata14:19
ativelkovhttp://docs.artifacts.apiary.io14:19
ativelkovBut it is still a work in progress14:19
ativelkovAnd I definetly have to update the FAQ page14:19
flwangarnaud: on glance side?14:19
zhiyanmarkwash: for vmware case, it's VMTX file14:19
arnaudoh sorry I meant in the template14:19
zhiyanbut disk (vmdk) file14:19
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
flwangarnaud: ok14:20
rosmaitafwiw, my opinion is artifacts: +1, locations: -114:20
markwashhow could it work if there are no disk images? wouldn't a useful template refer to a disk image somewhere?14:20
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
arnaudthe metadata file refers to the disk markwash14:20
zhiyanmarkwash: under my idea, those disk files are already been stored in backend14:20
arnaudthe vmware driver in nova can leverage the location of just having the *.vmtx afaik14:21
*** ativelkov has quit IRC14:21
zhiyanmarkwash: in vmware case, those vmdk files which belongs to template are all be pre-prepared in datastore14:21
zhiyanarnaud: yes, a handler14:21
zhiyanarnaud: oh, maybe not. we can do it in driver directly14:21
zhiyanarnaud: sorry, i mean leverage "clone" api14:22
arnaudzhiyan: yes14:22
zhiyananyway, those functions will use standard glance api, leverage location information14:22
*** saju_m has quit IRC14:22
markwashit seems like those image data references would do better living in the api than in a file you retrieve from the api14:22
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
hemanthhaha/win 4114:23
hemanthoops14:23
zhiyanmarkwash: iiuc, this vm template case is very similar with current OVF case14:24
arnaudmarkwash: I think the question is also to know when we expect the artifacts to be implemented14:24
zhiyanarnaud: and how to be implemented14:24
*** ativelkov_web has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
ativelkov_websorry folks, my irc proxy suddenly died14:25
arnaudativelkov_web: what is your timeframe for artifacts?14:26
arnaudyou expect it to land in juno?14:26
markwashI guess it seems like supporting ova makes sense in the short term14:26
markwashbut supporting other true template formats rather than container formats really conflicts with the artifacts approach14:26
ativelkov_webarnaud: yes14:26
markwashthe goal of which is to make things like instance templates totally above-board, rather than hiding them down in the image format14:27
ativelkov_webIn short-term I plan to complete the API spec draft by the mid of next week. Want to discuss it on the next meeting and start implementing14:27
arnaudativelkov_web: I fear that there will be a lot more discussions than just a week14:28
markwashit is likely14:28
ativelkov_webarnaud: sure. I mean, it takes too long for the initial draft, so I want to complete it asap14:29
ativelkov_webThen the discussion will take what it takes14:29
arnaudok ok14:29
markwashthe issue with using a template as the image data is that when you delete the template, glance will not delete any of the underlying disks14:29
markwashe.g.14:29
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
zhiyanativelkov_web: thanks14:29
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
markwashbut I suppose I'm going a bit farther than is needed14:29
*** zns has quit IRC14:29
zhiyanmarkwash: nod, it's valid point14:30
zhiyanmarkwash: and seems OVF has same "problem", for delete case14:30
markwashzhiyan: yes14:30
flwangmarkwash: so can the artifacts approach resolve this issue?14:31
zhiyanok, np markwash, seems you like to see it wait a while?14:31
markwashflwang: yes, definitely14:31
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
markwashjbernard was pursuing something along these lines14:31
*** gtt116 has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
zhiyantbh, i think probably we need a whole J cycle to make artifacts feature be stable..14:32
*** Barker has quit IRC14:32
markwashthat is most likely true14:32
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
ameade+1, double whatever estimates we make14:32
markwashbut I'm happier with waiting for a objects that are well defined vs overloading more possible meanings into Images14:32
zhiyanhmm..if so can we just try to do it by location approach first? (just a quick ask, not really sure for go that way)14:33
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
ativelkov_webWhat I want is to have some MVP to work by the end of J14:33
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
ativelkov_webso other projects may start using it14:33
rosmaitazhiyan: -1 locations for this14:33
zhiyanrosmaita: noticed14:34
rosmaita:)14:34
markwashyeah I don't want to see locations used for this either14:34
markwashI'm not sure locations can even help us with multiple formats at this point14:34
zhiyanrosmaita: anyway actually i think even it be there (with location way), the result just like OVF, not a big deal14:34
markwashthe images resource that locations live in just prevents it, it cannot be extended in this way14:34
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
zhiyanand artifacts can make it again if we like, by a plugin iiuc14:35
markwashzhiyan: I guess I was not aware we were using ovf quite in this manner14:35
zhiyanok, i got it.14:35
arnaudmarkwash: I don't think the ovf container format is used in nova14:36
zhiyanarnaud: yes, it's sure currently14:36
arnaudova will be in Juno for the vmware driver14:36
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:37
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:37
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:37
markwashova and ovf are different though in terms of how the disks are stored, correct?14:38
zhiyanarnaud: ova is cool, but i think a key situation is that there are a lot of vm template in customer's exist deployment.14:38
markwashlet's take this offline as needed, I think we've reached a conclusion for the moment14:38
markwash#topic open discussion14:38
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: glance)"14:38
*** rraja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
zhiyanmarkwash: seems glance v2 stuff in nova is turning to a big blocker for us..14:40
markwashyes, our deprecation plans are back quite a bit now14:41
zhiyanmarkwash: it failed our all interesting stuff14:41
markwashthough I suppose that with the way the nova v2/v3 discussion is going perhaps we should revisit the plan14:41
zhiyanhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-glance-v2-api14:42
zhiyani'd like to do some works for that, to make it landing asap14:42
ameademarkwash: is the way that is going is to hold off on v3?14:43
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:43
arnaudzhiyan: +1!14:44
markwashthat was the sense that I got but I kinda dropped off the thread after the 100th message14:44
zhiyanarnaud: he14:44
*** michael-yu has quit IRC14:45
ameademarkwash: i think it's good for us to pay attention to how hard it is to change versions across the board14:45
markwashyeah14:45
markwashand to think about all the client libraries out there in the world :-/14:45
ameadeheh yeah14:45
flwangmarkwash: so how about just combine all the client library like I mentioned with you?14:46
flwangmarkwash: and hide the difference between api version in the common library14:46
flwangfor now and future14:46
ameadezhiyan: we should ask esheffie1d what the status is on that, shouldn't be too far off14:46
zhiyanameade: yes, but i already synced up with him on my morning14:47
markwashflwang: I think that's an important strategy14:47
markwashI was also thinking of jclouds which I've been having to use recently14:47
markwashanyway, I have to go catch a bus14:47
markwashthanks everybody14:47
flwangmarkwash: yep, but if it's right, why not?14:47
zhiyanameade: actually i have already put two "pull-request" patchs there, to follow his current change.14:47
markwashthanks zhiyan for the discussion14:47
markwash#endmeeting14:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:47
*** markwash has quit IRC14:47
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 13 14:47:51 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-13-14.01.html14:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-13-14.01.txt14:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-13-14.01.log.html14:47
*** [BNC]ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** ativelkov has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** ameade has quit IRC14:51
*** hockeynut has quit IRC14:51
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** [BNC]ativelkov has quit IRC14:52
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC14:53
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** jprovazn_afk is now known as jprovazn14:54
*** ativelkov_web has quit IRC14:56
*** rook has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** csaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC15:02
*** julim has quit IRC15:02
*** shamail has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** cody-somerville- has quit IRC15:02
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** cody-somerville- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** jgallard has quit IRC15:03
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** scottda_ has quit IRC15:03
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** rraja has quit IRC15:03
*** rraja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
*** bswartz1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
bswartz1is anyone here?15:05
xyang1hi15:05
vponomaryovyes15:05
shamailYes sir.15:05
bswartz1I seem to be having technical difficulties15:05
vponomaryovhi15:05
bswartz1I've been trying to start the meeting for 5 minutes with no luck15:05
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC15:05
bswartz1I think my packets were getting eaten15:05
bswartz1and i couldn't see anything anyone was saying15:06
*** Scottda_mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
bswartz1my old nick should timeout in a moment15:06
yportnovahi15:06
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:06
*** bswartz has quit IRC15:07
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** bswartz1 is now known as bswartz15:07
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:07
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 13 15:07:25 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:07
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:07
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:07
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:07
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
bswartzthere we go15:07
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** scottda__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
csabahi15:07
Scottda_mobileHi15:07
bswartzokay sorry we're starting late -- it was an IRC server problem15:08
rrajahi15:08
*** cjellick has quit IRC15:08
bswartz#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ManilaMeetings15:08
*** venkatesh has quit IRC15:08
bswartzignore the first item15:08
bswartzthe activate stuff is being merged15:09
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:09
bswartzcsaba: do you have update on the image?15:09
bswartz#topic manila generic driver service vm image15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "manila generic driver service vm image (Meeting topic: manila)"15:09
bswartzcsaba: or is this agenda item out of date?15:10
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC15:10
*** alazarev has quit IRC15:10
csababswartz: yep we got finally a working setup  with the ubuntu  image courtesy of vponomaryov15:11
*** rohit404 has quit IRC15:11
csabanow we are sorting out how to adjust cirros to the expected behavior15:11
bswartzyeah I know about the ubuntu image, and I'm glad to have that15:11
bswartzare we close to having a cirros-derived image though15:11
bswartzfor the purpose of tempest testing it's important to have a lightweight image15:12
csabawe've seen to have a lot of refinements going into devstack integration, that really helped!15:12
*** sarob has quit IRC15:12
csabayes I think we are close to it15:13
bswartzcool15:13
bswartzanything to discuss on that? do you need any help?15:13
csabarraja just has a prognostisation of geting it working by Monday, I'm a bit more cautious than to tell dates :)15:13
bswartzheh okay15:14
*** funzo has quit IRC15:14
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
bswartz#topic modularization of the generic driver15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "modularization of the generic driver (Meeting topic: manila)"15:14
csabawell the instumentation is heavily ubuntuistic, probably we could make it more generic.. but that will be the cleanup part15:14
xyang1csaba: are we running nfs-kernel-server on a VM from this cirros image?15:15
bswartzthis came up yesterday and I though we might talk about it briefly15:15
csabaxyang1: yes15:15
csabathat's what we are to do15:15
xyang1csaba: thanks15:15
*** rkukura has quit IRC15:15
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:16
bswartzcsaba: what about ganesha-nfs support in the cirros image? is that something we're going to punt on so people will have to use something different?15:16
csabathat would be the next step15:17
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
bswartzokay well let's not hold up anything for ganesha support15:17
bswartzI'd rather have an image that only works with nfs-kernel-server than wait15:17
bswartzbut ganesha support is clearly worth doing soon afterwards15:18
bswartzokay so xyang1 brought up modularization yesterday15:18
bswartzhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/15:18
xyang1csaba: for a backend to work with nfs-ganesha, is it required for us to make changes in the nfs-ganesha project itself?15:18
bswartzpleaser review this change15:18
csabaxyang1: ATM I don't see now a need for that, we'll see15:19
*** Leonr has quit IRC15:19
csababswartz: sorry, should have done / will do15:20
bswartzokay so general dev status15:20
bswartz#topic dev status15:20
*** openstack changes topic to "dev status (Meeting topic: manila)"15:20
xyang1csaba: I thought there were code changes from glusterfs in the nfs-ganesha project for it to work with nfs-ganesha, but I can be wrong15:20
bswartzvponomaryov15:21
vponomaryovDev status:15:21
vponomaryov1) NetApp Cmode driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/15:21
vponomaryovUnittest refactor is in progress. Expected to be updated today.15:21
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
vponomaryov2) Generic driver's modularity: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/15:21
vponomaryovReady for merge. If no one has any objections, then can be merged.15:21
vponomaryov3) Tempest job for manila and python-manilaclient projects15:21
vponomaryovNow, we have devstack installation with generic driver and tempest tests in one job - gate-manila-tempest-dsvm-neutron15:21
vponomaryovFor 'manila' project - CLI and API tests (~150)15:21
vponomaryovFor 'manilaclient' project - CLI tests (29)15:21
vponomaryovIt fails for now due to little bug with exceeding of resources, fix for infra project has been commited - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79867/15:21
vponomaryovCode for tempest stored in manila as plugin: https://github.com/stackforge/manila/tree/master/contrib/tempest15:21
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:22
vponomaryovTODO:15:22
vponomaryov1) Make drivers (Generic, Cmode) use activation/deactivation API15:22
vponomaryov- generic driver depends on merge of modularity commit - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/15:22
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
vponomaryov2) (generic driver) Change service instance connectivity directly to private subnet15:22
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
vponomaryov3) Update Horizon extension for Manila due to API changes, bugfixing15:22
vponomaryov4) Implement volume types server side15:22
vponomaryov5) Implement quota for activation of share-networks15:22
vponomaryovthats all15:23
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
bswartzvponomaryov: ty!15:23
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:23
bswartzI have yet to review the modularization change, I'll do that soon15:24
bswartzthe rest looks like it's on track15:24
rrajavponmaryov: could you talk more on 2) (generic driver) Change service instance connectivity directly to private subnet?15:25
bswartzvponomaryov: are you working on the "Change service instance connectivity directly to private subnet" thing?15:25
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
*** ramashri has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
vponomaryovbswartz: No, not exactly me15:26
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
bswartzdo you have a sense of how much work that is?15:26
vponomaryov rraja: now driver uses router15:26
bswartzrraja: you know that right now the generic driver connects to the tenant network across a router, right?15:26
rrajabswartz: yes :)15:27
bswartzrraja: we agreed we wanted to change is to connect directly to tenant network like the hardware-based drivers do15:27
vponomaryovbswartz: sorry, don't have estimate for this15:27
bswartzthe main argument is for consistency15:27
bswartzI've heard arguments that using a virtual router may be better though so we can discuss that if anyone is opposed15:28
*** nikhil|afk is now known as nikhil__15:28
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
rrajabswartz: but there weren't there issues with direct connectivity and that's the reason we opted for the router?15:28
bswartzvponomaryov: the main reason I brought it up is because I think the horizon changes are higher priority15:28
*** snackewm has quit IRC15:28
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
bswartzrraja: there were, but found a workaround I believe15:29
bswartzwe* found a workaround15:29
*** sballe has quit IRC15:29
rrajabswartz: which was/is ?15:29
vponomaryovbswartz: I see, activation wil laffect horizon15:29
vponomaryovwe can postpone it15:30
*** markmcclain has quit IRC15:30
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:30
vponomaryovif needed15:30
bswartzyportnova: do you know the answer?15:30
yportnovabswartz: can not give the estimate now15:31
bswartzyportnova: no, about what the plan is to connect the generic driver directly to tenant network15:31
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
bswartzyportnova: it was one of your peers who figured out a solution for that15:31
yportnovabswartz: aostapenko was reasarching this connectivity issue. I do not have information right now15:32
*** ameade has quit IRC15:33
bswartzokay we should probably capture that in a BP15:34
bswartzthanks yportnova15:34
bswartz#topic Discussion on service VM role for generic driver and other (hypothetical) multitenant drivers15:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Discussion on service VM role for generic driver and other (hypothetical) multitenant drivers (Meeting topic: manila)"15:35
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:35
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:35
bswartzcsaba: did you have more you wanted to say about this15:35
csababswartz: not at the moment15:36
xyang1bswartz: so once the modulization change is reviewed and merged, we are ready for adding multitenancy support through a gateway driver?15:36
bswartzokay there was another item on the meeting agenda -- I guess I need to clean up the agenda better from week to week15:36
bswartzxyang1: yeah that's the next step15:37
bswartzgiven how much there is to do I'm not sure if that will get tacked before the conference15:38
bswartzI hope we can make progress on it, but I expect we can have some discussions about it in Atlanta15:38
*** lblanchard has quit IRC15:39
bswartzwe'll be having at least one more unconference session on manila, maybe a few if we have enough interest and thing to discuss15:39
bswartzthis is on top of the regular conference sessions on manila15:39
xyang1bswartz: you mean we may not be able to finish adding multitenancy support for drivers that need gateway service?15:39
bswartzthe unconference sessions will be more like design-summit sessions15:40
bswartzxyang1: I'm saying that unless someone steps up to complete the work it may take a while15:40
xyang1bswartz: ok, thanks15:41
bswartzthe focus is primarily on drivers for hardware which has native multitenancy support15:41
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
bswartzbecause that's something we know we can do well15:41
*** shamail_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
bswartz#topic open discussion15:42
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:42
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
bswartzanyone have anything else to discuss for today15:42
*** shamail has quit IRC15:42
*** shamail_ is now known as shamail15:42
xyang1bswartz: when will we know whether the Manila session is selected15:42
bswartzdoes anyone know when voting on conf sessions ends and the winners are announced?15:43
bswartzxyang1: what I can tell you is that there _will_ be a session, but it's more of a questions of how many15:44
xyang1bswartz: ok15:44
*** dprince has quit IRC15:44
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
bswartzokay thanks everyone15:44
xyang1thanks15:45
vponomaryovthanks15:45
shamailThanks, take care15:45
rrajathanks15:45
bswartz#endmeeting15:45
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:45
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 13 15:45:21 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:45
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-13-15.07.html15:45
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-13-15.07.txt15:45
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-13-15.07.log.html15:45
*** SushilKM has quit IRC15:45
*** shamail has quit IRC15:48
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** alazarev has quit IRC15:50
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** csaba has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** walker_ has quit IRC15:54
*** cjellick has quit IRC15:54
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC16:00
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC16:00
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:00
*** nwidell has quit IRC16:00
*** zns has quit IRC16:00
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** Barker has quit IRC16:02
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** jcoufal-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** jecarey has quit IRC16:07
*** dripton is now known as dripton_lunch16:07
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
*** rraja has quit IRC16:08
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** cjellick has quit IRC16:09
*** arnaud has quit IRC16:09
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** bdpayne__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** bdpayne has quit IRC16:12
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:13
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
*** cjellick has quit IRC16:14
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC16:14
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:14
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC16:15
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:16
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** jcoufal-mobile has quit IRC16:17
*** jcoufal-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** michael-yu has quit IRC16:18
*** bdpayne__ has quit IRC16:20
*** greghaynes has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
*** sarob has quit IRC16:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** cjellick has quit IRC16:23
*** rkukura has quit IRC16:27
*** sarob has quit IRC16:27
*** jcoufal-mobile_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:28
*** jcoufal-mobile has quit IRC16:28
*** jcoufal-mobile_ has quit IRC16:28
*** jcoufal-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC16:30
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:30
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** jcoufal-mobile_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
*** jcoufal-mobile_ has quit IRC16:33
*** jcoufal-mobile has quit IRC16:33
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** tanisdl has quit IRC16:34
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:40
*** sarob has quit IRC16:42
*** esp has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:47
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** ameade has quit IRC16:51
*** dripton_lunch is now known as dripton16:51
*** paulmo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:52
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
*** hockeynut has quit IRC16:54
*** zns has quit IRC16:57
*** caleb_ has quit IRC16:57
*** khyati_ has quit IRC16:58
*** jtomasek has quit IRC17:00
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** fcarpenter has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** fcarpenter has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
*** coasterz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
*** bob_nettleton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:06
*** diversity has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
*** igormarnat_ has quit IRC17:07
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** michael-yu has quit IRC17:10
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:10
*** Scottda_mobile has quit IRC17:11
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC17:13
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
*** nacim has quit IRC17:14
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
*** demorris has quit IRC17:16
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:18
*** xyang1 has quit IRC17:20
*** bob_nettleton has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** diversity has quit IRC17:23
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
*** sballe has quit IRC17:24
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
*** sarob has quit IRC17:25
*** derekh has quit IRC17:25
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
*** bdpayne has quit IRC17:26
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:26
*** NehaV has quit IRC17:28
*** luqas has quit IRC17:28
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** igormarnat_ has quit IRC17:30
*** nbouthors has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
*** luqas has quit IRC17:33
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** GlenDarling has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** sballe has quit IRC17:42
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:42
*** dprince_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:46
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:47
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** atiwari has quit IRC17:51
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** gyee has quit IRC17:53
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:53
*** dprince has quit IRC17:54
*** ErikB has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** ameade has quit IRC17:56
*** mattf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** dmitryme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** markwash has quit IRC17:59
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** jgallard has quit IRC18:01
*** pcm_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** OSM has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** rohit404 has quit IRC18:03
*** OSM has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
SergeyLukjanovhey savanna/sahara folks18:03
crobertsrhHi18:03
alazarevo/18:03
*** GlenDarling has quit IRC18:03
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:04
SergeyLukjanov#startmeeting sahara18:04
elmikohi18:04
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 13 18:04:15 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:04
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:04
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'18:04
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
aignatovo/18:04
SergeyLukjanovyeah, I've typed sahara, not savanna!18:04
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87IsNotAwa18:04
mattfsav^hhara18:04
*** flaper87IsNotAwa is now known as flaper87DoesNotK18:04
*** flaper87DoesNotK is now known as flaper87WTF18:05
*** flaper87WTF is now known as flaper8718:05
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda18:05
*** ErikB2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
SergeyLukjanov#topic News / updates18:05
*** openstack changes topic to "News / updates (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:05
SergeyLukjanovfolks, please18:05
*** bob_nettleton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
SergeyLukjanov#info graduation review tc meeting logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-03-11-20.03.html18:06
tmckayI think the client renaming is done18:06
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
crobertsrhMostly renaming activities for sahara-dashboard with occasional touchpoints on the other projects.  Getting closer to done.18:06
SergeyLukjanov#info there are no concerns raised on tc meeting, waiting for voting18:06
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:06
*** NehaV has quit IRC18:06
mattfwaiting waiting waiting18:06
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
ErikB2Good progress on AMBARI-1783. Will plan to incorporate into HDP plugin once GA.18:06
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC18:06
SergeyLukjanovmattf, yeah18:07
aignatovactually I was 5 day off this week but started to rename main savanna service18:07
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, voting next week?18:07
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
tmckayaignatov, I can help you if you need it18:07
mattfErikB2, are you removing puppet in that same effort?18:07
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, technically, it's already started, but looks like tc folks waiting for review from ttx18:07
ErikB2The last TC meeting was pretty smooth (compare that to the incubation meeting, jeesh)18:07
ruhecouldn't be smoother18:08
aignatovtmckay: ok, we have a questions about backward compat18:08
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, yup, the awosome progress18:08
mattfit was amazingly smooth18:08
alazarevI've added support of multi-regions (on review, but for J) and added integration tests for IDH 3.0.2 (on review as well)18:08
SergeyLukjanovawesome*18:08
ErikB2mattf, not in the same motion, that will happen later (or not by us)18:08
mattfmaybe they were tired from beating up on DinaBelova18:08
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
alazarevor were preparing to neutron :)18:09
ErikB2aignatov, once heat becomes the default provisioning engine, will the Nova stuff still be there, or will that be removed?18:09
aignatovmattf: no, it's because our excellent work since incubation18:09
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, ++18:09
*** paulmo has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
mattfaignatov, that certainly didn't hurt18:09
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, depends on feature parity, but the plan is to remove it in J18:10
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_18:10
SergeyLukjanovany other news?18:10
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, I would vote to not remove.18:10
aignatovErikB2: I'll do my best to apply nova for heat, actually there are some bugs/bps in heat which can help tightly integrate heat engine with both neutron-nova18:10
*** sarob has quit IRC18:10
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, why?18:11
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, there are some distros out there that have chosen not to include heat.18:11
mattfremoving isn't unreasonable, so long as we have feature parity18:11
* mattf hmmmmms18:11
aignatovguys, actually there are no huge efforts to be done to include nova with heat, really18:11
SergeyLukjanovit's integrated project, I think all distros will include it eventually18:11
SergeyLukjanovit's a big question for us for summit / Juno about removing/keeping direct engine18:12
SergeyLukjanovlet's move on now18:12
SergeyLukjanov#topic Project naming status18:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Project naming status (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:12
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, I agree eventually that will happen, but it makes it impossible to use Savanna on anything w/out Heat.18:12
SergeyLukjanov#info all repos / lp projects / wiki spaces / teams / groups / mls / etc has been removed18:13
mattfErikB2, this may be the first real upstream/downstream conflict. is the distro supporting sahara?18:13
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: there are still 3 minor issues on the wiki, 2 on Sahara/How_To_Release, 1 on Sahara/BugTriage18:14
SergeyLukjanov#info gate is now blocked, I'm working on unblocking it18:14
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, it's on me, I remember18:14
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:14
SergeyLukjanov#info savanna-ci is now quite broken too (neutron issue)18:14
SergeyLukjanovI hope it'll be fixed tomorrow ^^18:14
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:15
SergeyLukjanovcurrently we collected a lot of CRs for renaming18:15
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:15
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: as for sahara-image-elements, it's been merged but we are waiting on a HortonWorks rename for the hadoop-swift image before we can eliminate all references to savanna18:15
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, great18:15
SergeyLukjanovI'll start merging some CRs when see gate working correctly and notify all team members about it18:16
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC18:16
aignatovI'd prefer to merge all sahara main patches only WITH savanna-ci's +118:16
tmckayaignatov, ++18:16
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, sure, we shouldn't brake own project :)18:16
tmckayI am putting my trust in ci for thos18:16
aignatovyesterday I sent patch for renaming swift-edp configs and now it fight with me: I can't understand - is it my patch introduce some bugs or intermittent issues with ci18:17
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, I'm afraid that neutron isn't working atm on savanna-ci18:17
SergeyLukjanovI'll check it after the meeting18:18
NikitaKonovalovdashboard tests are giving -1 now due to an old image in a testing lab18:18
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
tmckayaignatov, so, how will hadoop itself be fixed?  Doesn't the ".savanna" part of the url get handled in hadoop?  Or am I wrong?18:18
tmckayfor swift, I mean18:18
SergeyLukjanovNikitaKonovalov, and so it was tested manually by aignatov and NikitaKonovalov18:18
NikitaKonovalovthat will go away when nodepool rebuilds the snapshot18:18
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:19
*** IlyaE has quit IRC18:19
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, it's about backward compat, next topic18:19
SergeyLukjanovany thoughts on renaming except backward compat?18:19
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
aignatovtmckay: ".savanna" is handled in hadoop but just renaming to any word should work I hoped18:19
*** julienvey has quit IRC18:19
aignatovI mean there is no hardcode ".savanna" in hadoop-swift.jar18:19
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:20
aignatovonly in openstack/savanna18:20
tmckayaignatov, ah, okay.  I wasn't sure how that happened.  Nice.18:20
SergeyLukjanovsahara*18:20
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
SergeyLukjanov#topic Backward compatibility for renaming18:20
*** openstack changes topic to "Backward compatibility for renaming (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:20
tmckaywe need to put bitcoins in a jar every time someone says savanna :)18:20
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
elmikolol18:20
mattflol18:20
SergeyLukjanov:)18:21
SergeyLukjanovso, let's discuss backward compat18:21
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
aignatovtmckay: the latest savanna-ci run show me that edp works at least in vanilla but in HDP it didn't go to SUCCEEDED :(18:21
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:21
*** ramashri has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
SergeyLukjanovnote: we already break it several times in Icehouse cycle (API, client)18:21
aignatovand IDH went to Error...RRRRR18:21
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
SergeyLukjanovnote: we introduced migrations in I, so, no way to migrate from 0.3 to Icehouse18:22
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:22
tmckayaignatov, hmmm.  do you want help debugging?18:22
mattfdo we all agree that compat becomes of paramount importance once we've graduated?18:22
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:22
SergeyLukjanovnote: it's a good practice to squash migrations for release to one migration "icehouse_release"18:22
aignatovSergeyLukjanov: I'd prefer to forget about compatibility :)18:22
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
tmckayI have my trusty laptop, which is easy to run integration tests on :)18:22
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:22
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
SergeyLukjanovmattf, ++18:23
tmckaymattf, ++18:23
dmitrymemattf, agree18:23
elmikomattf, +118:23
aignatovtmckay: it would be great, especially EDP+not vanilla18:23
crobertsrhyes18:23
SergeyLukjanovmattf, in case of graduation, Juno will be our first integrated release and so, we'll need to keep backward compat after it18:23
mattfif we decide compat isn't important w/ this rename then we should not even pretend -- we should not have a savannaclient at all, only saharaclient18:23
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
elmikomattf, what is the scope of breaking backward compat?18:24
SergeyLukjanovmattf, yup, just use them for transition and then remove18:24
mattfit's worse to provide a savannaclient that breaks api than it is to provide no attempt at compat18:24
tmckayaignatov, okay.  I've never successfully run one of the plugins locally on Fedora, but now is maybe the time to try (or get a RHEL box)18:24
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:24
SergeyLukjanovmattf, agreed18:24
ErikB2mattf, +118:24
tmckaymattf, ++, all or nothing, absolutely18:24
mattfelmiko, that's a good question. the api is an easy answer, but i don't think that's a complete answer.18:24
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:25
elmikomattf, i agree about providing a broken savannaclient worse than no compat18:25
SergeyLukjanov#startvote No backward compat for renaming? Yes, No, Abstain18:25
openstackBegin voting on: No backward compat for renaming? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:25
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.18:25
SergeyLukjanovto have it in logs18:25
mattfhold up18:25
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:26
SergeyLukjanovmattf, ?18:26
mattfwhat's the motivation for psuedo-compat savannaclient?18:26
dmitryme#vote yes18:26
mattfSergeyLukjanov, you said somethng about "transition" - what's the motivation and scope for that transition18:26
tmckayelmiko, some existing objects in the savanna db might fail after upgrade18:26
tmckayelmiko, strings that contain savanna (bitcoin)18:26
alazarev#vote yes18:26
SergeyLukjanovmattf, only to go through the gate18:26
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:26
dmitrymeam, I thought we are not going to keep savannaclient18:27
dmitrymeonly saharaclient18:27
*** phil_h has quit IRC18:27
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
elmikotmckay, wouldn't we want to catch those and upgrade them asap?18:27
dmitrymeSergeyLukjanov: so once gate issues resolved, we will drop it, right?18:27
alazarevsavannaclient < 0.5 should exist18:27
SergeyLukjanovmattf, because of circular dependency between sahara / sahara-client / devstack / devstack-gate / tempest18:27
mattfSergeyLukjanov, so we either have a single commit we force through the gate or we have a commit that passes the gate and a second commit that removes the compat?18:27
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:27
SergeyLukjanovmattf, the second option18:27
SergeyLukjanovdmitryme, yu[18:27
tmckayelmiko, well, to catch them means an alembic database migration script.  To have 0 backward compat means, they fail.18:28
NikitaKonovalov#vote abstain18:28
tmckayMake a new database18:28
mattfSergeyLukjanov, those are the 2 options though?18:28
elmikotmckay, got it18:28
SergeyLukjanovmattf, it'll make us able to always pass CI18:28
SergeyLukjanovmattf, I mean that we'll "we have a commit that passes the gate and a second commit that removes the compat"18:28
SergeyLukjanov#vote yes18:28
sreshetnyak#vote yes18:28
ruhe#vote yes18:29
crobertsrh#vote abstain18:29
mattfrelated to this is if we should just scrap all db migrations, after renaming just have folks recreate their db ---  no compat18:29
elmiko#vote abstain18:29
* mattf feels very railroaded18:29
tmckaymattf, that is a good question.18:29
mattfit's not clear to me that we understand the scope of what we're voting on18:29
tmckaydoes a no kill the vote?18:29
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC18:30
elmikomattf, i know i don't...18:30
crobertsrhI agree that perhaps I'm just not clear enough to make a yes vote out of me.18:30
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
SergeyLukjanovwe're voting to not keep backward compat, we could discuss details separately18:30
SergeyLukjanovsuch as migrations18:30
SergeyLukjanovI can close it and we'll vote after discussing details18:30
tmckayI think I would at least endorse migrations. It's painless.18:30
mattfif we vote to do no compat that means we don't provide migrations18:31
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: i like the idea of killing backward compat, but i really don't know the scope of that decision well enough18:31
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, I don't like data manipulations inside the migrations18:31
mattfwe can't do a blanket vote and then piecemeal details.18:31
tmckayhaving to dump a database because of code change is really, really bad form.  I used to make users do it in another project, until I fixed it :)18:31
mattfcant/shouldnt18:31
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, we'll need to have a good tests for it18:31
SergeyLukjanovmattf, it's about overall approach18:32
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, ack18:32
SergeyLukjanov#closevote18:32
SergeyLukjanov#endvote18:32
openstackVoted on "No backward compat for renaming?" Results are18:32
openstackYes (5): ruhe, alazarev, dmitryme, SergeyLukjanov, sreshetnyak18:32
openstackAbstain (3): NikitaKonovalov, elmiko, crobertsrh18:32
SergeyLukjanov#undo18:32
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Vote object at 0x2b43490>18:32
SergeyLukjanov#undo18:32
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x2ab63d0>18:32
SergeyLukjanov#topic Backward compatibility for renaming18:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Backward compatibility for renaming (Meeting topic: sahara)"18:32
mattfwhat are the specific areas where compat is in question?18:32
ErikB2API18:33
aignatovsavanna-db18:33
mattfwe have client, we have db, ui urls18:33
tmckayEDP database objects18:33
SergeyLukjanov#1 migrations for .savanna suffix and savanna-db prefix18:33
aignatovsavanna_url18:33
*** ftcjeff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, API isn't changed18:33
mattfsavanna_use_neutron etc...config18:33
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, property names will18:33
SergeyLukjanov#2 configs like SAVANNA_USE_NEUTRON in dashboard18:33
ErikB2Also Swift18:33
aignatov.savanna in Swift, yes18:34
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, aignatov, it's #1 that I mentioned18:34
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, yez18:34
aignatovbut I don't know how to test all it today18:34
tmckayThe "savanna_url" param in the Client.__init__() method.18:34
SergeyLukjanovpersonally, I think that it's useless to keep #2 old-named configs18:34
mattfSergeyLukjanov, let's build the list first18:35
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, we've agreed that there is no need to keep savannaclient, so, there is no need to keep savanna_url in saharaclient18:35
mattfwhat i'd give for a notepad18:35
ErikB2SergeyLukjanov, I agree. I would like to see us move forward with as little baggage as possible18:35
*** sarob__ has quit IRC18:35
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, ack18:35
* SergeyLukjanov creating an etherpad to list options18:35
SergeyLukjanovhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/savanna-renaming-backward-compat18:36
mattfAPI (payloads), savanna-db, EDP db obks, client (modules and api), config (e.g. SAVANNA_URL etc)18:36
aignatovguys, the most important thins that there is no much time to do good backward-compat code since release is coming18:36
mattfAPI (payloads), savanna-db, EDP db objs, client (modules and api), config (e.g. SAVANNA_URL etc)18:36
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, agreed, and additionally, it sounds useless due to the fact that Icehouse is our first aligned release18:37
mattfAPI (payloads), savanna-db, EDP db objs, client (modules and api), config (e.g. SAVANNA_URL etc), swift integration18:37
dmitrymeaignatov: I think people want to have a clear view of what we will miss if we drop compatibility18:37
*** amcrn has quit IRC18:37
mattfanything missing from ^^?18:37
SergeyLukjanovmattf, please, add to the etherpdad18:37
mattfsure18:37
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
aignatovmattf: docs with cleat description18:38
aignatov*clear18:38
aignatovI mean if we'll keep compat we should add notes to all compat points, we need to describe that here you can use savanna_url and sahara_url as well18:39
aignatovjust for example18:39
aignatovit's time18:39
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, and we'll need to remove this compat anyway18:39
SergeyLukjanovto continue improving project18:39
bob_nettletonelmiko, regarding the savanna-image-elements change you mentioned earlier, can you be more specific about "we are waiting on a HortonWorks rename for the hadoop-swift image before we can eliminate all references to savanna" ?  What exactly needs to be changed?18:41
SergeyLukjanovmattf, what's the REST API payloads?18:41
mattfSergeyLukjanov, the json prop names ErikB2 mentioned18:41
mattfe.g. tags18:41
SergeyLukjanovmattf, Image Regitry18:41
SergeyLukjanovI'll add a separated point for it18:41
*** safchain has quit IRC18:42
mattfk18:42
elmikobob_nettleton: in the file elements/hadoop-hdp/source-repository-hadoopswift, the link to the hortonworks s3 contains a savanna dir name. that's it18:42
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
bob_nettletonelmiko, ok, thanks for clarifying this.18:42
elmikobob_nettleton: np :)18:42
aignatovso what would be our final decision about compatibility?18:43
mattfconfiguration, python client, rest api, all database storage, documentation18:43
mattf^^ my high level summary18:43
SergeyLukjanovdocumentation seems strange in this list18:44
mattfa decision for no compat will essentially mean you cannot upgrade across the rename18:44
mattfyou'll have to create your db18:44
mattfupdate all your scripts to use new names18:44
mattfhandle any diff in rest calls18:44
mattfuse new configuration18:44
mattfSergeyLukjanov, yeah, but it's true18:44
mattfam i missing anything?18:44
SergeyLukjanovthe latest released savanna version is 0.3 and you already need to do all stuff mattf mentions18:44
mattfSergeyLukjanov, yup, but now we're part of openstack. we should at least go into the decision with all the relevant information.18:45
mattfi'm not advocating either way atm. i just want us to make an informed decision18:45
SergeyLukjanovmattf, sure18:45
SergeyLukjanovmattf, I'm not against this discussion18:45
mattflet's give it another minute to see if anyone thinks of something missing from the list18:46
elmikoSergeyLukjanov, mattf, what is the downside to carrying backward compat into Icehouse and the removing before the next major release?18:46
mattfelmiko, it's not clear that we currently have a mandate to maintain compat and it's a lot of work18:46
alazarevmattf: but I don't see other options, adding compat will take a lot of efforts18:46
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, we'll need weeks of coding and testing to make it18:47
aignatovone missed point is new tests, I mean if we want to keep compat we need to write more tests around that18:47
elmikogot it, thanks18:47
mattfok, sounds like we agree that the list is complete enough18:47
SergeyLukjanovand it's not clear for me what's the starting point for such backward compat - 0.3 or mid Icehouse18:47
SergeyLukjanovmattf, + urls in UI probably is a bit important too18:48
mattfErikB2, no compat may have the biggest impact on you. what's your opinion?18:48
aignatovSergeyLukjanov: it seems that 0.3 is already lost :)18:48
ErikB2mattf,  perhaps, but my vote would be for no compat until start of juno18:48
aignatovI remember one my patch that breaks.... hmm...ok...  I will silent18:49
mattfErikB2, ok18:49
alazarevaignatov: it breaks even working 0.3 now :)18:49
SergeyLukjanovErikB2, ++18:49
mattfand it's been raised a number of times that compat is very expensive right now18:49
aignatovalazarev: psst, silence18:50
aignatovxD18:50
mattfSergeyLukjanov, and we agree that our mandate for compat really starts after integration?18:50
SergeyLukjanovthe backward compat is veey important starting from Juno release, especially API compat18:50
SergeyLukjanovmattf, first integrated release I think18:50
aignatovmattf:  ++18:50
alazarev+1 on starting compat from I release18:50
mattfanyone have any questions about what we're voting on when we say no compat?18:50
aignatov+1 on start compat from Icehouse, yes18:51
crobertsrhNope, I feel better about voting now18:51
SergeyLukjanovthere is a diff between starting from I release vs. starting from J (first integrated release)18:51
elmikomattf, we vote "yes" for no compat?18:51
SergeyLukjanovso, any thoughts on I vs. J?18:51
aignatovso I vote "yes" for no compat as well18:51
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: you mean I release, or I start?18:51
mattfelmiko, i'm just curious if there are any more questions before we vote18:51
elmikomattf, none from me, i feel better about the scope now18:52
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: or mid18:52
SergeyLukjanovok, let's re-word18:52
SergeyLukjanovwould we like to have migrations and other compat stuff from Icehouse tag to Juno tag18:52
tmckay"icehouse can break everything"  --- reworded :)18:52
SergeyLukjanovor starting  from Juno tag (potentially first integrated release)18:52
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: what do you mean by integration release?18:53
SergeyLukjanovintegrated release is the first release being the integrated project18:53
SergeyLukjanovwith sync gate18:53
SergeyLukjanovand etc.18:53
alazarevlet's define compat-start point, everything before it is not upgradable18:53
elmikothat means integrated into full openstack?18:53
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, it means that we'll graduate from incubation and release18:54
elmikoSergeyLukjanov: ok, understood ty18:54
mattfalazarev, +118:54
SergeyLukjanovelmiko, Juno is the first release when we could be part of18:54
aignatovwill we vote today again?18:54
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, yep18:54
aignatov5 mins left18:54
* elmiko still getting up to speed on terminology18:54
mattfelmiko, it's a little funky18:55
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: do you mean j-1?18:55
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, nope18:55
SergeyLukjanovdev releases are dev releases :)18:55
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: sahara release at time of I release (non-integrated)?18:55
aignatovlets move this topic to some design session and discuss all rules about compatibility18:56
SergeyLukjanovlet's vote for not keeping backward compat for renaming18:56
mattfack18:56
SergeyLukjanovand than decide the start point for keeping full backwark compat18:56
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
SergeyLukjanov#startvote Should we keep backward compat for renaming? Yes, No, Abstain18:56
openstackBegin voting on: Should we keep backward compat for renaming? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain.18:56
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.18:56
mattfaignatov, alazarev, it may be easier to just define a date when we start maintaining compat18:56
mattf#vote no18:57
crobertsrh#vote no18:57
elmiko#voite no18:57
SergeyLukjanov#vote no18:57
elmiko#vote no18:57
dmitryme#vote no18:57
ErikB2#vote no18:57
aignatov#vote no18:57
tmckay#vote no18:57
sreshetnyak#vote no18:57
NikitaKonovalov#vote no18:57
ErikB2*expecting mattf to vote for himself*18:58
mattfErikB2, that's so last week!18:58
ErikB2I know18:58
alazarev#vore no18:58
alazarev#vote no18:58
bob_nettleton#vote no18:58
aignatov#vote yes18:58
aignatovjust for some drama :)18:58
elmikolol18:58
SergeyLukjanov:)18:58
mattfaignatov, i think we already filled the drama quota18:58
crobertsrhNew vote...aignatov handles all pre-renaming backward compatability changes.18:59
SergeyLukjanov30 secs more18:59
aignatovmattf: lol, exactly18:59
*** N00b has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
mattfvote yes18:59
SergeyLukjanovcrobertsrh ++18:59
elmikocrobertsrh: +118:59
tmckayno compat means I have mess with one of my patches again, sigh18:59
SergeyLukjanov#endvote18:59
openstackVoted on "Should we keep backward compat for renaming?" Results are18:59
openstackYes (1): aignatov18:59
mattftmckay, yeah18:59
openstackNo (11): bob_nettleton, NikitaKonovalov, dmitryme, elmiko, ErikB2, crobertsrh, tmckay, mattf, SergeyLukjanov, alazarev, sreshetnyak18:59
*** N00b is now known as Guest3474918:59
aignatovcrobertsrh: lol!18:59
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
SergeyLukjanovso, let's start next meeting from discussion about the starting point for full backward compat19:00
SergeyLukjanovthan you all folks19:00
SergeyLukjanov#endmeeting19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 13 19:00:12 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-03-13-18.04.html19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-03-13-18.04.txt19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-03-13-18.04.log.html19:00
mattfthanks folks19:00
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
mattftime to go rip out the backward compat code!19:00
*** bob_nettleton has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** lenrow_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
mattfciao19:00
*** mattf has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** elmiko has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC19:01
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:02
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** lenrow__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
SumitNaiksatamHi Neutron groupies! ;-)19:03
banixHi group policy crowd!19:03
banix:)19:03
cgoncalvesgreetings everyone!19:03
s3wonghello everyone!19:03
SumitNaiksatamsorry we are a little late, previous meeting ran over19:03
*** demorris has quit IRC19:03
rkukurahi19:03
nbouthorshello19:03
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
thinrichsHi all19:03
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
banixKyle is not around19:03
banixon PTO19:03
SumitNaiksatambanix: yeah, he is away19:04
s3wongmestery is on vacation, so I guess SumitNaiksatam will chair today?19:04
mandeephi banix SumitNaiksatam cgoncalves s3wong rkukura thinrichs nbouthors19:04
*** dmitryme has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
SumitNaiksatambanix: i will start the meeting19:04
banixcool19:04
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
SumitNaiksatam#startmeeting networking_policy19:04
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 13 19:04:32 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SumitNaiksatam. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:04
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:04
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'19:04
SumitNaiksatami think the previous meeting was pretty taxing19:04
SumitNaiksatamso probably we will keep today's meeting short, give people a chance to catch a breath before the ODL meeting19:05
banixbut made some progress :) in discussiong important items19:05
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: hence not making it back to back with group-policy would be ideal :-)19:05
*** prasadv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** lenrow_ has quit IRC19:05
SumitNaiksatambanix s3wong: :-)19:05
SumitNaiksatamso action items from last time19:05
SumitNaiksatam(it helps that i did not have any :-P)19:05
SumitNaiksatam #topic Action Item Review19:05
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: quick question: ODL meeting focusing on group policy and/or chaining?19:06
s3wongcgoncalves: group policy for ODL19:06
s3wongindependent of Neutron19:06
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: ^^^19:06
SumitNaiksatamso the action item was for the team - Group Policy members to comment on the document here for next week19:07
mandeepcgoncalves: (ODL => OpenDayLight)19:07
cgoncalvess3wong: I will have to find where the meeting is at and which time. thanks19:07
SumitNaiksatam#link https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_0019:07
SumitNaiksatamwe got a few comments, and i responded to them19:07
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves s3wong: make sense?19:07
s3wongI did my part and posted a bunch of comments, in which SumitNaiksatam responded to all19:07
banixI think we were waiting for a more complete document first; no?19:07
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yes, you are off the hook ;-P19:07
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes sure19:08
SumitNaiksatambanix: unfortunately did not make as much progress as expected19:08
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: yes, terminology changed, and I would like to see how a composite of actions is represented19:08
SumitNaiksatambanix: but you an still comment if you feel comfortable19:08
mandeepbanix: Yes.19:08
banixno problem19:08
s3wongbut overall, your responses were good19:08
SumitNaiksatams3wong: i am not too worried about the definition of actions19:08
SumitNaiksatams3wong: i think we can collectively enumerate19:09
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ok19:09
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: easy for you to say, I was originally tasked to define various types of actions :-)19:09
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ha (i am trying to punt it, as you can tell)19:09
banixare we still thinking along the 3 or 4 actions we had looked at?19:09
banixsecurity, redirection, qos19:09
s3wongbanix: I believe so19:10
s3wonglet's start with those first19:10
banixsounds good19:10
*** marun has quit IRC19:10
s3wongthough we are only committed to security for the PoC :-)19:10
mandeepmore like: allow, redirect, add-label, qos-level, etc19:10
nbouthorswhat about a comment from Carlos Gonsalves on missing name attributes. It seems to be gone19:10
banixI think in the context of redirect we will need to see how we relate to services, insertion, chaining, etc19:10
s3wongmandeep: do we want to introduct label now? or should we focus on what we can achieve for the PoC?19:11
mandeepbanix: IMO security would not be an action, but a call of actions19:11
SumitNaiksatambanix mandeep: i think we have the same semantics in mind, terminlogy19:11
mandeeps3wong: We can define those, but implement what we need for PoC19:11
s3wongmandeep: security is a fundamental action type - as 'deny' is default, but tenants can set 'allow'19:11
SumitNaiksatammandeep: yeah i agree19:11
mandeep(makes understanding the roadmap easier)19:11
hemanthraviwill contract also address derivation of service_context?19:12
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yes, i think what mandeep is saying is the action name should probably be allow, deny, etc19:12
hemanthraviservice_context from the adv-services19:12
SumitNaiksatams3wong: the term "security" does not sound like an action19:12
banixhemanthravi: that is what we need to discuss19:12
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
prasadvI agree with sumit and mandeep wrt to naming security19:13
banixSumitNaiksatam: get on with the old terminology :)19:13
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: I am open to other term. But 'allow' needs to be allowed19:13
SumitNaiksatams3wong banix absolutely19:13
mandeephemanthravi: That needs to be represented for"matching"/"providing" service, but not clear in my mind yet as to how we can expose it19:13
banixget on board :) just kidding19:13
SumitNaiksatambanix: :-)19:13
banixYes we can of course come up with better names but that's not that important19:14
mandeepbanix: agreed19:14
banixAs I see it, we need to finalize the model first to get going19:14
SumitNaiksatambanix: agreed, agreed don't want to rat hole on the names19:14
SumitNaiksatamso hemanth's point19:14
prasadvbanix: I agree19:14
SumitNaiksatambanix: agree19:15
s3wongwhat is hemanthravi 's point?19:15
s3wongsorry :-)19:15
banixSo is the main issue that seems to need more discussion is integration with advanced services? or we are punting on that at the moment?19:16
SumitNaiksatami meant hemanthravi's question19:16
SumitNaiksatambanix: good point19:16
mandeeps3wong: He was asking how is the service-context exposed in a contarct (or that that is what I understood)19:16
SumitNaiksatambanix: i think the model comes first19:16
SumitNaiksatamadv services' integration comes next19:16
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: Agreed19:16
SumitNaiksatambanix: i think thats how you see it, right?19:16
banixyes19:17
s3wongmandeep: OK19:17
SumitNaiksatami mean stating the obvious19:17
hemanthravimandeep: yes, I thought contract when realized by provider will give the info for the service_context19:17
banixjust wanted to see what are the things we need to address and then go after them19:17
banixSumitNaiksatam: yes19:17
SumitNaiksatami believe hemanthravi's point is that to validate the contract model, we need to consider all aspects19:17
mandeephemanthravi: I agree that is required, just not clear on how to represent it best19:17
s3wonghemanthravi: I don't know how service insertion points can be represented here, really. Since our classifier is L4 based19:17
mandeeps3wong: We do not need to limit the model to L4 based classifiers. That just may be a limitation of a PoC19:18
SumitNaiksatambtw, let me check the topic19:18
banixI had earlier suggested that a policy can be the insertion point for a chain but Sumit was suggesting that may not be the case19:18
SumitNaiksatam#topic Model review19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Model review (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:19
hemanthravis3wong: agree, not sure how either, but might be the right object to define this19:19
banixShall we have a goal of finalizing the model to the extent that is reasonable by next week?19:19
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC19:19
SumitNaiksatambanix: i think what you say makes sense19:19
SumitNaiksatambanix: i do not recall what i said earlier :-)19:19
s3wongmandeep: I think in earlier days, prasadv wanted to have IP address in classifier; which we collectively rejected (sorry, prasadv)19:20
prasadvmandeep: earlier discussion we had, classifier is limited to L419:20
SumitNaiksatamok guys one sec, banix's question first19:20
prasadvi wanted to have IP and we had some discussion around that19:20
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes, i agree i think its a good goal for next week,19:20
s3wongif we want to extend classifier, it would be above L4, not below. Since we want to hide location addressing scheme from policy19:20
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: sorry19:21
mandeepWe need to create policy in terms of content, not identity. So above L4 is what I was thinking19:21
SumitNaiksatam#action Team to finalize the model by next week, SumitNaiksatam to get back with filling any holes19:21
banixLet us (looking at myself) have a complete review of the model in the coming days and try to resolve any issues remaining in the meeting next week.19:21
SumitNaiksatam#undo19:21
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Action object at 0x2bad990>19:21
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
*** zns has quit IRC19:22
banixno that was a good action item sumit19:22
*** lenrow has quit IRC19:22
SumitNaiksatam#action Team to review/finalize the model by next week, SumitNaiksatam to get back with filling any holes19:22
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: can we get writable right on the document?19:22
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yeah sure, i thought it was open to anyone with link19:22
SumitNaiksatams3wong:  i can check back19:22
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: no, it says comments only19:23
SumitNaiksatambanix: you did not like the action item?19:23
*** betsy has quit IRC19:23
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:23
SumitNaiksatambanix: oh sorry, i misread your statement19:23
banixI did; I did not undoing it19:23
SumitNaiksatambanix: sorry, rephrasing :-)19:23
SumitNaiksatamok so what else do we want to discuss on the model (after that we will discuss the services' aspect)19:24
*** NehaV has quit IRC19:24
SumitNaiksatami discuss based on the extent that you could review the current version19:24
SumitNaiksatam*i meant19:24
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: mandeep wants us to introduce label into the model, anyone brave enough to take that step :-) ?19:25
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ha19:25
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: We just need to get more work done there ... I have been delinquent this week!19:25
SumitNaiksatammandeep: i think mandeep volunteered19:25
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: cool, great for mandeep :-)19:25
mandeepYes19:25
SumitNaiksatams3wong: i meant mandeep volunteered :-)19:26
SumitNaiksatamok next topic19:26
s3wongdon't forget to both subject label and consumption label :-)19:26
banixs3wong, man deep: are we talking about labels as they are defined in the ODL group policy?19:26
banixsure19:26
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:26
s3wongbanix: that's the only label I know of :-)19:26
SumitNaiksatambanix s3wong go ahead19:26
mandeepbanix: maybe a subset first19:26
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
banixmandeep: makes sense19:27
nbouthors There is an n-m relation between Endpoint Group and Contract, does that mean that there should be a way to get back the Endpoint Groups related to a specific Contract? (List a list attribute back)19:27
banixI think so19:28
SumitNaiksatamnbouthors: yeah, i think so to19:28
s3wongnbouthors: in the endpoint group definition page, there are struct to access both provided_contracts and consumed_cotracts19:28
s3wongso you should be able to get to contracts via endpoint group19:29
SumitNaiksatams3wong: i think nbouthors is asking can be go back from contracts to EPG19:29
banixyes that can be done as well19:29
banixI san we can do the db model such that it can be done19:29
banixI mean19:29
SumitNaiksatami think what we don't want is the consuming EPG directly referencing the providing EPG19:30
marunuh19:30
marunso an endpoint group can be 0..1 with a network but endpoint is 1:1 with port19:30
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: hmm... at least I guess what contracts the EPG provides should be in the EPG object19:30
marundoes that imply that an endpoint group has to have a network if it has any endpoints?19:30
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yes19:30
banixSumitNaiksatam: agree19:31
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:31
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:31
mandeepmarun: no19:31
marunor is the relationship between neutron port/network not necessary reflected in the relationship between endpoint and endpoint group?19:31
SumitNaiksatammarun: perhaps in the legacy mapping19:31
mandeepmarun: The relationship on that end is 1..019:31
marunmandeep: maybe i need to rephrase19:32
mandeepmarun: So for every Neutron network, we will create a corresponding End Point Group, but not vice-versa19:32
banixs3wong: not necessarily; we should be able to get that information but that does not require the list of contracts being part of EPG19:32
marunmandeep: I get that19:32
banixbut i see that is part of the model19:32
s3wongbanix: how so?19:32
marunmandeep: I'm asking if, for an endpoint group associated with a network, that all endpoints in the group are associated with ports in that network19:32
mandeepmarun: Yes19:33
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:33
*** hockeynut has quit IRC19:33
banixfrom having policies associated with EPGs in a separate table; (may be i am referring to something different.)19:33
mandeepmarun: That is the implied semantics to keep policy consistent with current implemntation of Neutron19:33
marunmandeep: so what would come first?  would an endpoint group have to be associated with a network before an endpoint could be created?19:34
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
marunmandeep: the 1:1 between endpoint and port would seem to imply this19:34
marunmandeep: or can an endpoint exist without a port?19:34
s3wongbanix: so I found out about that recently also. Our old policy is now contract :-) but as nbouthors suggested, is there anyway to get from EPG to contract19:34
mandeepmarun: An end point can not exist without a port.19:34
s3wongand we probably don't want to walk through all contracts to get to matching EPG, right?19:35
*** atiwari has quit IRC19:35
marunmandeep: ok.  and an endpoint group without a network would be useful for defining the policy side of things without a target.  gotcha19:35
*** kathmandude has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
mandeepmarun: (for now, eventually we could allow physical ports to be members of endpointgroups - to allow bare metal integration)19:36
*** yogesh has quit IRC19:36
banixs3wong: correct wrt not walking through policies. the current model suggests peg has list of associated policies/contracts19:36
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
marunmandeep: ok19:36
s3wongbanix: right, that was what we talked about. EPG (or peg) has to maintain a list of provided contracts, at the very least19:37
s3wongBTW, sorry for branching off to another discussion, guys19:38
prasadvcan we end this meeting 15 minutes early, some of us are going to ODL group policy meeting19:38
SumitNaiksatamok do we want to switch gears to integration with advanced services?19:38
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: ah ok19:38
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: should we talk about that in the adv. service meeting?19:38
banixs3wong: just referring to the implementation aspects of how to do that.19:38
SumitNaiksatamlets discuss for 5mins19:38
SumitNaiksatamand we can finish early19:38
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: or do you think the adv. srv. meeting is too busy as is :-_19:39
SumitNaiksatam#topic Integration with advanced services19:39
*** openstack changes topic to "Integration with advanced services (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:39
s3wongbanix: OK19:39
SumitNaiksatamyeah, i could not bring this up though i had in the agenda in the last meeting19:39
SumitNaiksatamso essentially, would like to hear what your thoughts are on this19:39
prasadvthe integration will come only with redirect action right?19:39
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: ah thats the kind of discussion we want to have19:40
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: there were suggestions that we can build a linear chain via the 'redirect' list19:40
banixprasadv: that's what we have discussed so far19:40
*** sarob has quit IRC19:40
SumitNaiksatamthere is a pragmatic side to things, as to what we want to achieve for the PoC19:40
s3wongand "insert" a service also via 'redirect' action19:40
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
SumitNaiksatambut our model needs to be robust that it can extend beyond that19:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
prasadvs3wong: I thought you said that list is a copy list? not a chain19:41
s3wongand 'deny' the traffic to the destination EPG initially19:41
s3wongprasadv: I think there was never any consensus on whether or not the list should be ordered19:41
*** sarob has quit IRC19:42
SumitNaiksatam#action SumitNaiksatam to check with s3wong, prasadv on what was discussed before in the context of service chains19:42
prasadvs3wong: if advanced services defines a chain, shoudnt we use that ?19:42
banixprasadv: yes19:42
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: i would have imagined that would be the case19:42
s3wongif the 'redirect' list contains element only for mirroring traffic, then order should not matter19:42
mandeepprasadv: agreed19:42
banixI think that's a reasonable choice19:42
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: since what we are building is the policy framework which should ideally leverage other neutron primitives19:43
s3wongprasadv: that was the original case, where service chain is defined outside of policy framework19:43
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ok makes sense19:43
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC19:43
banixI think if we know there is a mechanism to define a service chain we should use it19:43
prasadvdoes advanced services include chain definition to have tap type device19:43
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: yes that was the proposal19:43
*** venkatesh has quit IRC19:44
s3wongbanix: I think Anees was the one who wanted the 'redirect' action to have hook for service chain definition :-)19:44
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: separate attribute for tap19:44
prasadvsince that involves mirroring and forwarding at the same time19:44
mandeeps3wong: ideally we have a different actions for tap (mirror) vs. redirect (say to a firewall that can drop the traffic)19:44
s3wongprosadv: that can be controlled by 'allow' or 'deny' on a different action-type19:44
prasadvmandeep: if the chain has say snort and firewall19:45
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:45
SumitNaiksatamok so we did gather some preliminary requirements from this short dicussion19:45
banixs3wongL yes, so far we have essentially have punted on how the service chain is defined within our policy framework; assuming we will pick it up from services workk19:45
*** eghobo has quit IRC19:45
SumitNaiksatamper earlier request, lets stop here for today19:45
prasadvsumit: thanks19:45
s3wongmandeep: that should be controlled by whether users want to 'deny' traffic or still 'allow' them to the dst EPG19:45
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:45
mandeeps3wong: Let me read the document again. I think I might just be confused19:45
SumitNaiksatam#action advanced services discussion to be continued for next meeting, perhaps with a longer time allocation19:45
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: agreed :-) let's plant these seeds for now19:45
SumitNaiksatams3wong: we will end up growing a forest at this rate19:46
mandeep;-)19:46
SumitNaiksatamok thanks guys!19:46
prasadvbye19:46
s3wongthanks!19:46
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:46
banixLet's review the model as much as we can this week! Bring up any concerns. on the doc, ML.19:46
mandeepMany plants, but no fruits!19:46
mandeep(yet)19:46
*** prasadv has quit IRC19:47
SumitNaiksatam#endmeeting19:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:47
banixthanks everybody19:47
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 13 19:47:02 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-13-19.04.html19:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-13-19.04.txt19:47
s3wongAnd please let us write to the document :-) ensure chaos!19:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-13-19.04.log.html19:47
SumitNaiksatamthanks all, bye19:47
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC19:47
*** thinrichs has quit IRC19:47
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** s3wong has quit IRC19:49
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:50
*** arnaud has quit IRC19:50
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
*** Barker has quit IRC19:51
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:51
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC19:52
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:52
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
*** venkatesh has quit IRC19:56
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
*** Guest34749 has quit IRC19:57
*** nbouthors has quit IRC19:58
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** walker_ has quit IRC20:02
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:02
*** lblanchard has quit IRC20:03
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** rohit404 has quit IRC20:04
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
*** amytron has quit IRC20:09
*** lenrow has quit IRC20:09
*** OSM has quit IRC20:10
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
*** kathmandude has quit IRC20:15
*** julim has quit IRC20:15
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:15
*** jcoufal has quit IRC20:16
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
*** NehaV has quit IRC20:20
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
*** yogesh has quit IRC20:20
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:20
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:27
*** ijw has quit IRC20:28
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
*** walker_ has quit IRC20:29
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
*** walker_ has quit IRC20:37
*** japplewhite has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:38
*** tmckay is now known as tmckay_bbl20:39
*** eghobo has quit IRC20:40
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:41
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** eghobo has quit IRC20:47
*** jprovazn has quit IRC20:47
*** jdob has quit IRC20:47
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:48
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:51
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
*** catherineD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** fcarpenter has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** waiman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** pdmars has quit IRC21:02
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:02
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:03
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** igormarnat_ has quit IRC21:03
*** lenrow__ has quit IRC21:03
*** bswartz has quit IRC21:03
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** rohit404 has quit IRC21:07
*** dprince_ has quit IRC21:07
*** tmckay_bbl has quit IRC21:09
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
*** ijw has quit IRC21:15
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** safchain has quit IRC21:20
*** banix has quit IRC21:21
*** ameade has quit IRC21:26
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:29
*** sarob has quit IRC21:30
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** markmcclain has quit IRC21:31
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** baoli has quit IRC21:38
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** Barker has quit IRC21:47
*** sarob has quit IRC21:49
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:50
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC21:51
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** fcarpenter has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:53
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** sarob has quit IRC21:55
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:57
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:58
rockyg#startmeeting RefStack22:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 13 22:00:33 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rockyg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'22:00
*** rkukura has quit IRC22:00
*** fcarpenter has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
rockygRoll call22:01
davidlenwelloh did the time shift with day light savings?22:01
rockygYup.22:01
*** ijw has quit IRC22:01
davidlenwellwe've all been talking in #refstack for about an hour22:01
fcarpenterthat makes sense22:01
davidlenwellyeah .. its all utc22:02
davidlenwellemerica!22:02
davidlenwellhere!22:02
rockygI caught the tail.  I'm fighting a network driver incompatibility in Ubuntu.  Frustrating and getting me to that obsessive, kill all mode22:02
catherineDhere22:02
davidlenwellrockyg: drivers in ubuntu can have that effect22:02
fcarpenterhere22:02
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
tedchanghrer22:03
tedchanghere22:03
rockygExcept for the kernel.  The driver hangs, goes zombie to the point that the machine needs a hard boot to get it back.  Won't soft reboot22:03
catherineDRaymond is also here22:03
davidlenwellI think rob is on vacation so its just us ..22:03
davidlenwellagenda:  status, goals22:04
rockygCool.  Forgot to come up with an agenda as usual, but I think a current stat of cod would be a good start.22:04
rockyg#topic Status22:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Status (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:04
davidlenwellprogress!!!22:04
*** RaymondWong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
davidlenwellwe've landed a few important commits in the last week22:04
rockygYay!  I've seen a number of check ins22:04
rockygand read the DB schema checkin22:04
*** denis_makogon_ has quit IRC22:05
davidlenwellalso the api public function for recieving results22:05
RaymondWongi am going to check in that "read the DB" code today.22:05
rockygI see the hardcoding is giving way to better methods.22:05
davidlenwellthat part hasn't fully landed yet22:05
rockygYeah.  But some great learning and education about python best practices going on.22:06
davidlenwellcatherineD, tedchang and raymod have put up some  blue prints and some initial commits .. but we are getting close22:06
*** Tedchang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
davidlenwellthanks to fcarpenter22:06
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
davidlenwellwho is an excelent code reviewer22:06
*** Ranjitha has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:06
fcarpenteri do my best22:06
rockygand probably knows how to spell excellent22:06
*** yogesh has quit IRC22:07
rockyg;-)22:07
fcarpentere-x-c-something something22:07
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC22:07
davidlenwellha.. my irc is in a terminal and does not have the spell check that macos has made me rely on so heavily22:07
davidlenwellmoving along22:08
davidlenwellgoals before next week?22:08
*** waiman has quit IRC22:08
rockygIt's Thursday and lots has been happening, but my question is: how close are we to me being able to run a refstack test against a devstack cloud?22:08
davidlenwellI'd say by next thursday you'll be able to do that and see an html score card22:08
rockygYYEESSSSSS!22:09
davidlenwellrockyg: at that time you and I should plan some facetime to pimp out our docs and wikis22:09
davidlenwellfrom there we'll need to load test and set some goals for getting us managed by infra22:09
rockygSo, I think we have our goals identified.  next question is:  from RefStack.org gui or from package I install?22:10
davidlenwellnot yet .. will have that going by monday22:10
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
davidlenwellboth22:10
rockygI'm really looking to get deeper doc stuff.  I am a top down and bottom up kinda engineer, so the middle out is the hardest for me.22:10
davidlenwellby that I mean that on monday I'll have things publishing live as they merge22:11
*** Leonr has quit IRC22:11
*** amytron has quit IRC22:11
davidlenwellso that when code reviews happen and things merge they are on refstack.org shorly after22:11
rockygFantastic.22:11
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:11
*** NehaV has quit IRC22:12
davidlenwellthe goal all along is to have both remote and internal official testing22:12
rockygAnother part of status:  the fits mailing list and should we send an email to the dev list to let folks know who/where/what we are?  Sounds like next Friday or Monday for the dev email?22:12
*** Tedchang_ has quit IRC22:12
rockygfcarpenter: is there a python way to generate a db schema doc from the code?22:13
davidlenwellspynx22:14
rockygOK.  I'll spend time digging deeper into it.22:14
davidlenwelland that should be another engineering task .. setup auto generation of docs22:14
*** ramashri has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
davidlenwellit can actually be easily done in the merge process with a commit to the infra-config repo .. I think .. < fungi??22:15
davidlenwellI think that puts docs in the correct place on openstack.org or something unless I just made that up ..22:15
rockyg:-)22:16
davidlenwellI did attend an infra boot camp . but I've slept since then22:16
rockygI want to link to it from the wiki, but will need it to be a live link that changes with the merges.22:17
fungiwell, if you're talking about generating/updating code documentation on each commit, we do that currently for api docs22:17
rockygSounds like that's what I need. Infra bootcamp.22:17
*** jtomasek has quit IRC22:17
davidlenwellfungi: yes .. that is what I am reffering to22:17
rockygDB schema docs, too.22:17
*** hockeynut has quit IRC22:18
fungithe docs below http://api.openstack.org/api-ref.html22:18
fungilike http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute.html22:18
rockygOK.  anything else on status?  Runnable local and remote refstack working by 3/20 CoB?22:19
fungithose are dynamically generated using sphinx from jenkins jobs run after each commit merges22:19
davidlenwellrockyg: sounds right22:19
rockygSo we just need to provide location for the api file (pretty obvious) and the DB file (less obvious, but we can workit out)22:20
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC22:20
davidlenwelldo you mean a url?22:20
davidlenwelloh .. that22:21
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
davidlenwellyeah22:21
davidlenwellwe need to move all the api calls into the api file .. right now they are in web.py22:21
davidlenwellI can do that22:21
davidlenwelland catherineD can you guys please put any new api calls into that file ?22:21
rockygOK. That covers status and short term goals.  What about long term  davidlenwell:  yeah. URLs for the auto-genned docs.22:21
davidlenwellI'll make sure they get loaded correctly22:21
catherineDsure will do22:22
catherineDfor the new API22:22
davidlenwellinterface22:22
davidlenwellrockyg: .. we have a lot of work to do on the ui22:22
davidlenwellwe should have a ftf ux planning event and work out how this app will look behave and provide22:23
rockygDo we want a default of some small number of tests for the refstack runs?  Do we already have that?22:23
davidlenwellrob has a lot of opinions about that so we'll need to coordinate with him22:23
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:23
davidlenwellby default we want refstack to always run all tests22:23
davidlenwellright now we are limiting it because we want to be able to debug faster22:23
rockygRight, but this is for trial run purposes22:23
davidlenwellcorrect22:24
rockygMaybe the gui defaults to show trial and you could select full as an alternative?22:24
rockygUntil we are farther along.22:24
davidlenwellrockyg: thats certaily an option.. want to file it as a blue print and put some stuff in the whiteboard22:25
davidlenwellwe'll define it more clearly and get it into the pipeline22:25
rockygSure.  also, have we figured out how we are going to let users select test sets?22:25
davidlenwellim not sure we're going to22:26
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC22:26
RaymondWongif they are running local copy, they can set the test sets in the config file.22:26
*** tmckay is now known as tmckay_bbl22:26
davidlenwellI was speaking for refstack.org22:26
rockygMaybe submit a config file to refstack.org?22:27
davidlenwellI wouldn't want to do that22:27
davidlenwellif they want custom config they can run a local copy22:27
davidlenwellrefstack.org will be for official testing only22:27
rockygOK.22:27
davidlenwellby verified vendors22:27
davidlenwellvendors who want an official openstack seal on their website22:28
davidlenwellthat will link into a report card on refstack22:28
davidlenwellbut we still want all the results from everyone22:28
davidlenwellthen we can built interesting interop maps and really give users fun tools that are useful22:28
rockygThen users and ops would run the package instead.22:28
davidlenwellyes22:29
rockyg#action    I'm gonna make sure this gets captured in the requirements22:30
davidlenwellrockyg: thank you22:30
davidlenwellanything else?22:31
rockyg#topic open discussion22:31
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: RefStack)"22:31
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:32
rockygDon't forget to sign up to fits@lists.openstack.org22:32
davidlenwellI think I did that the day they brought it up22:32
catherineDthx rockyg:22:32
rockyg:-)22:33
catherineDany status about Rally?22:33
catherineDare we (RefStack and Rally) working together22:33
rockygHave not seen any dev list postings.  I heard that Mirantis is going to join us in force soon.  That's why I want to make sure we're using the mailing list instead of our internal collected emails.  but, I haven't seen many new people jump on board.22:34
davidlenwellnobody from rally has talked to me directly22:34
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:34
davidlenwellI would encourage them to do so if we are supposed to work together22:35
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:35
rockygOh, I have a request for davidlenwell and/or fcarpenter:  could one/both of you write a simple unit test so that catherine and team has a good example to start from?22:36
davidlenwellprobably won't have the head space for it until wednesday .. but I can make that happen22:36
davidlenwellfile a blue print22:36
davidlenwellthat is what I am going to work from22:36
rockygKnowing the system makes it easier to write more by others.  And, I will file a blueprint;-)22:37
davidlenwellrockyg: agreed22:37
davidlenwellthere is a stub of a test in there.. needed it to get into stackforge .. but its just a stub22:37
rockyg#action  two blueprints:  unit test and auto gen docs and ??  I think there's one more.22:39
davidlenwellactually if we are going to do this right we should have unit tests updated for every merge22:39
davidlenwellshouldn't pass review if it doesn't have propper test coverage.. it can just be labor intensive and I am horrible about keeping upt hat habit my self22:40
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:40
davidlenwellbut we'll reach a critical mass of code where we'll need to rely on those tests to make sure things aren't broken22:41
davidlenwelland I'd rather start now than have to rush it all in later22:41
rockygWell, once the working demo is landed, hopefully there will be a little more time to write tests.22:41
davidlenwellbut this should probably be a goal for the next sprint22:41
davidlenwellI digress22:41
rockygEspecially now that we are moving from hardcoded to configurable.22:41
fcarpentereducate the new guy: what's the sprint schedule for refstack (begin/end)?22:42
rockygtopic is open discussion.22:42
davidlenwellits two weeks fcarpenter.. we are midway now22:42
fcarpenterthank you22:42
rockygmid term goal is RefStack for Havana by Icehouse summit22:42
davidlenwellshould line up with piston22:42
rockygBut, we're not great on getting our stories straight;-)  Right now, it's tasks.22:43
*** eghobo has quit IRC22:43
davidlenwellrockyg: correct22:44
davidlenwellinfra is working on something called storyboard22:44
davidlenwellits going to give openstack more real scrum than lp22:44
rockygYeah.  Attended the IRC this morning.  but I thought it was a replacement for BPs and bugs and project management....22:45
rockygIt sounds like HP is hiring a UI guy for the effort.22:45
*** tedchang__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:46
davidlenwellrockyg: yaeh .. they're all about it22:46
davidlenwellI hope they build in a migration path from pivotal tracker and piston can use them .. "hope"22:46
*** ErikB2 has quit IRC22:46
davidlenwellokay . im good with ending now . have to get back to packing22:47
rockygConsidering I think LP BPs and bugs system is one of the worst I've had to navigate in quite a while, I was hoping they would do something like use Pivitol's tools.22:47
tedchang__good luck :)22:47
davidlenwellits not open source22:47
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:47
davidlenwellrockyg: infra won't adopt anything new that isn't open source .. period22:47
davidlenwelland apache lic .. I think22:48
rockygWhen you make it up here, consider dropping by for some wine in my backyard on some Saturday.  goes for everyone here.22:48
davidlenwellare you in south bay rocky?22:48
rockygYup.22:48
rockygEasy access from highways.  It's supposed to get to 78 Saturday.22:49
fcarpenterdavidlenwell: I can drive you ;)22:49
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC22:49
rockygKnow where you're going to rent yet?  Pacifica?22:50
*** walker_ has quit IRC22:50
rockyg#endmeeting  See you guys on refstack.22:50
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:50
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 13 22:50:40 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:50
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-13-22.00.html22:50
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-13-22.00.txt22:50
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-03-13-22.00.log.html22:50
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** fcarpenter has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** arnaud has quit IRC22:53
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:54
*** yogesh has quit IRC22:55
*** tedchang__ has quit IRC22:57
*** tanisdl has quit IRC22:58
*** julim has quit IRC22:59
*** sarob has quit IRC23:00
*** eguz has quit IRC23:00
*** ftcjeff has quit IRC23:02
*** alazarev has quit IRC23:02
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** flwang has quit IRC23:07
*** PeterSchwaller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:09
*** demorris has quit IRC23:09
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC23:11
*** atiwari_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:17
*** eankutse has quit IRC23:18
*** atiwari_ has quit IRC23:18
*** atiwari_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:18
*** atiwari has quit IRC23:19
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:21
*** ErikB has quit IRC23:22
*** rockyg has quit IRC23:24
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:27
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** atiwari_ has quit IRC23:32
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:34
*** rohit404_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:37
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk23:37
*** scottda_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:37
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:42
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** michael-yu has quit IRC23:45
*** rohit404 has quit IRC23:45
*** khyati has quit IRC23:45
*** snackewm has quit IRC23:45
*** rohit404_ is now known as rohit40423:45
*** scottda__ has quit IRC23:46
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:46
*** spredzy has quit IRC23:51
*** spredzy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** kevinconway has quit IRC23:52
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:52
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** snackewm has quit IRC23:53
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:54
*** malini has quit IRC23:57
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!