Thursday, 2013-11-14

*** kraman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:00
*** kraman has quit IRC00:05
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:10
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:15
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o clarkb00:16
*** clarkb changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"00:17
hub_caphorray00:18
*** ChanServ sets mode: -o clarkb00:18
*** Barker has quit IRC00:19
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:24
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:25
*** rnirmal has quit IRC00:27
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:30
*** cpallares has quit IRC00:32
*** yidclare has quit IRC00:36
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:38
*** coolsvap has quit IRC00:38
*** sballe has quit IRC00:40
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC00:46
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:52
*** kraman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:01
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
*** brents has quit IRC01:02
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:05
*** nosnos has quit IRC01:05
*** kraman has quit IRC01:06
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:06
*** amytron has quit IRC01:09
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:11
*** yidclare has quit IRC01:14
*** gokrokve has quit IRC01:16
*** yogesh has quit IRC01:26
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:27
*** yogesh has quit IRC01:31
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** markwash has quit IRC01:40
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** bdpayne has quit IRC01:46
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** gokrokve has quit IRC01:54
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC02:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** kraman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:02
*** gokrokve has quit IRC02:05
*** kraman has quit IRC02:07
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:08
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:11
*** twoputt_ has quit IRC02:24
*** twoputt has quit IRC02:24
*** sacharya has quit IRC02:27
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:32
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:34
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:34
*** sacharya has quit IRC02:34
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:34
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:35
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away02:35
*** dcahill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:36
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:37
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:38
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:38
*** markwash has quit IRC02:41
*** kraman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:41
*** yidclare has quit IRC02:42
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul02:43
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:44
*** flwang has quit IRC02:44
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:48
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs03:02
*** aratim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** enikanorov has quit IRC03:20
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:22
*** nicole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:23
*** nicole is now known as Guest3558503:23
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:53
*** HenryG has quit IRC03:55
*** radix has quit IRC03:58
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:00
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:04
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:04
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC04:04
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:05
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:06
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:09
*** vipul has quit IRC04:09
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:09
*** vipul has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:10
*** jcru has quit IRC04:11
*** zane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** aratim has quit IRC04:22
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:25
*** Guest35585 has quit IRC04:29
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:30
*** brents has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:36
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:41
*** Barker has quit IRC04:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:49
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:49
*** zane has quit IRC04:49
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:53
*** zane1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:59
*** aratim2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:00
*** amcrn has quit IRC05:10
*** esker has quit IRC05:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:18
*** brents has quit IRC05:19
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away05:20
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:24
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:24
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:24
*** sarob has quit IRC05:26
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:27
*** sarob has quit IRC05:27
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** brents has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:29
*** sarob has quit IRC05:32
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC05:34
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:34
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:34
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul05:37
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:39
*** yogesh has quit IRC05:40
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away05:52
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:53
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul05:56
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:56
*** yogesh has quit IRC05:58
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC06:02
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:05
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:07
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:09
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:10
*** esker has quit IRC06:12
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC06:13
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:13
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC06:17
*** radix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:28
*** ccrouch has quit IRC06:28
*** esheffield has quit IRC06:28
*** ameade has quit IRC06:28
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:34
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:36
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:38
*** aratim2 has quit IRC06:39
*** sarob has quit IRC06:43
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk06:44
*** yogesh has quit IRC06:45
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:45
*** mjbright__ has quit IRC06:53
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:00
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:02
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC07:08
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:09
*** zane1 has quit IRC07:12
*** yogesh has quit IRC07:13
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:13
*** brents has quit IRC07:13
*** aignatov has quit IRC07:17
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** gokrokve has quit IRC07:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:20
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:24
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:34
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:35
*** coolsvap has quit IRC07:40
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:41
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC07:45
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** coolsvap has quit IRC07:49
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:51
*** noslzzp has quit IRC07:55
*** Krast has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:00
*** flwang has quit IRC08:01
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:02
*** flwang1 has quit IRC08:03
*** mjbright_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:03
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC08:03
*** aignatov has quit IRC08:03
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:08
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:09
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC08:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:13
*** gokrokve has quit IRC08:18
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:28
*** markwash has quit IRC08:40
*** hub_cap_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:40
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC08:40
*** shadower_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:41
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:43
*** rsblendido has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:43
*** 20WAAKLSA has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** ccrouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** flaper87 has quit IRC08:44
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** lsmola_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** shadower has quit IRC08:45
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** jcoufal has quit IRC08:45
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** mjbright_ has quit IRC08:45
*** mjbright_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** shadower_ has quit IRC08:45
*** shadower_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** lsmola_ has quit IRC08:45
*** lsmola_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** Krast has quit IRC08:45
*** shadower has quit IRC08:45
*** radix has quit IRC08:45
*** dcahill has quit IRC08:45
*** lsmola has quit IRC08:45
*** jesusaurus has quit IRC08:45
*** hub_cap has quit IRC08:45
*** GheRivero has quit IRC08:45
*** Krast has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** radix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** dcahill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** jesusaurus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** nosnos has quit IRC08:46
*** boris-42 has quit IRC08:47
*** IlyaE has quit IRC08:47
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:49
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:54
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:58
*** markwash has quit IRC09:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:09
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:15
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** gokrokve has quit IRC09:19
*** boris-42 has quit IRC09:21
*** svapneel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:27
*** svapneel has quit IRC09:27
*** svapneel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:27
*** coolsvap has quit IRC09:28
*** svapneel has quit IRC09:31
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:32
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:37
*** natishalom has quit IRC09:41
*** yogesh has quit IRC09:41
*** flwang has quit IRC09:41
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:41
*** yogesh has quit IRC09:46
*** coolsvap has quit IRC09:51
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:53
*** natishalom has quit IRC09:57
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:59
*** natishalom has quit IRC10:04
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:05
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC10:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:07
*** natishalom has quit IRC10:10
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:11
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC10:11
*** Krast has quit IRC10:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:15
*** natishalom has quit IRC10:16
*** aignatov has quit IRC10:17
*** gokrokve has quit IRC10:20
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:24
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:28
*** 20WAAKLSA has quit IRC10:32
*** natishalom has quit IRC10:32
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:33
*** nosnos has quit IRC10:37
*** svapneel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:43
*** svapneel has quit IRC10:44
*** coolsvap has quit IRC10:44
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:45
*** natishalom has quit IRC10:49
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** metabro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:01
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:16
*** gokrokve has quit IRC11:20
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:24
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:16
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC12:18
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:19
*** gokrokve has quit IRC12:21
*** aignatov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:28
*** aignatov has quit IRC12:29
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov12:30
*** aignatov has quit IRC12:33
*** themistymay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:34
*** shanks has quit IRC12:35
*** shanks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:36
*** jcoufal has quit IRC12:37
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:40
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** shanks has quit IRC12:44
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:45
*** shanks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:46
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** themistymay has quit IRC12:53
*** shanks has quit IRC12:55
*** shanks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:56
*** IlyaE has quit IRC13:05
*** kevinconway has quit IRC13:09
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:11
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:11
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** resker has quit IRC13:20
*** gokrokve has quit IRC13:24
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:25
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov13:25
*** _SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC13:26
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:50
*** kevinconway has quit IRC13:52
*** jtomasek has quit IRC13:53
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** aignatov has quit IRC14:06
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC14:07
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
*** eankutse has quit IRC14:15
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** boris-42 has quit IRC14:20
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** gokrokve has quit IRC14:25
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** vponomaryov has quit IRC14:28
*** kevinconway has quit IRC14:29
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:38
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:38
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
*** kevinconway has quit IRC14:44
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:52
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** gregsfortytwo1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** jcorbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 14 15:01:25 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:01
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
bswartzgood morning folks15:01
xyang1good morning15:01
jcorbinGood Morning15:01
bswartzI don't have an agenda today15:02
*** glenng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
bswartztoday is my first day back since I extended my stay in Hong Kong15:02
bswartzwe can talk about the conference however15:02
glenng*conference was good"15:03
*** caitlin56 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
bswartzyeah I enjoyed meeting many of you at the conference15:03
vbellurglenng: +115:03
xyang1nice meeting everyone15:03
bswartzI think that the unconference session was successful15:03
*** pdmars has quit IRC15:03
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzfor those of you who weren't able to be there, the unconference session was well attended, and the questions asked were good ones15:04
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzthe main thing that i realized after seeing how much interest there is in the project is that we need to get the project into a state where vendors can write backends very soon15:05
*** bill_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
caitlin56+115:06
bswartzI suspect the best way to do that is to get the mutitenant support working ASAP, and to add support for that to the NetApp driver15:06
vbellurbswartz: agree15:06
glenngbswartz: Agree.15:06
xyang1+115:06
bswartzthat means that the so-called Generic driver (or "LVM" driver) is less important in the short term15:06
bswartzthe generic driver has been sucking up a lot of time and attention and ultimately it's not critical to getting other backends implemented15:07
vponomaryovbswartz: I can make update about multitenancy15:07
caitlin56LVM driver is of most interest to the TC - i suspect most of the people here want to build their own drivers.15:07
bswartzit IS critical for an actual release, so we can't simply ignore it15:07
vponomaryov1) Generic LXC share driver - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55265/15:08
bswartzoh thanks for reminding me caitlin5615:08
vponomaryov2) Neutron API module - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55555/15:08
vponomaryov3) Network allocation in ShareManager - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55558/15:08
bswartzevidently the TC considered our incubation request last tuesday, while I was on an airplane15:08
xyang1I thought we are going with full blown VM?15:08
*** pdmars has quit IRC15:09
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:09
bswartzI was under the impression that it would be considered next tuesday but they're considering it all this week15:09
bswartzso the LVM driver is an issue for them15:09
vbellurbswartz: even I was under the impression that it would be on 19th15:09
bswartzthere are a few important points about that15:10
bswartzvbellur: I bet it's because I told you that date15:10
bswartzvbellur: I was the one who was mistaken however15:10
*** navneet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
vbellurbswartz: possibly so, I never bothered to check either.15:10
bswartz1) We must stop calling it the "LVM driver" -- it shall becalled the "Generic Driver" henceforth15:10
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
bswartz2) I propose that the generic driver uses virtualization (based on nova) and a block device backend (based on cinder)15:11
bswartzvponomaryov: I have yet to look at the LXC code that's been written, but if it works I don't want to ignore it15:12
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
caitlin56bswartz: and implements generic NFS/CIFS from stock linux?15:12
*** IlyaE has quit IRC15:12
*** lpabon has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
vponomaryovbswartz: yes, it works, tested15:12
bswartzvponomaryov: As I mentioned above, everything related to the generic driver is low priority in the short term though15:13
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC15:13
vponomaryovfor each implementation of protocols can be written class-helper15:13
caitlin56yponmaryov: but isn't setting up things like tenant specific DNS take extra work (even though I have seen scripts that demonstrate how).15:13
vponomaryovbut not tied yet with neutron code15:13
bswartzvponomaryov: I'll look at it soon, the other 2 changes are more interesting however15:13
jcorbinvponomaryov: First code review link works, other 2 give permission errors. Is this expected?15:14
bswartzyes it seems that the submissions are marked private currently15:14
*** rsblendido has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
vponomaryovjcorbin: yes, it hat restricted access, at least, for now15:15
bswartzvponomaryov: please add access to jcorbin as he's familiar with neutron and I'd like his feedback as well15:16
*** aostapenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
bswartzanyone else who's curious please ping vponomaryov too15:16
*** japplewhite has quit IRC15:16
*** achirko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:16
navneetmee too15:17
xyang1vponomaryov: please add me too15:17
vbellurvponomaryov: me too15:17
vponomaryovjcorbin: provide your username in launchpad15:17
bswartzso the other thing that's clear from the conference is that there is strong interest in the "tunneled" style of access, expecially for backends like ceph and gluster15:17
glenngvponomaryov: My Launchpad name is ggobeli15:17
bswartzAny IBM/GPFS folks here?15:18
jcorbinvponomaryov: My Launchpad name is osjcorbin. Thanks!15:18
bill_azvponomaryov:  also me - billowen@us.ibm.com15:18
bswartzvponomaryov: it looks like *Everyone* is interested may as well mark it public15:18
xyang1vponomaryov: my launchpad name is: xing-yang15:18
bill_azAnd I'm IBM/GPFS15:18
bswartzbill_az: have you given any thought to the multitenant access issues?15:18
vbellurvponomaryov: my launchpad id is vbellur15:18
bswartzbill_az: is GPFS going to be in the same boat as ceph and gluster?15:19
vponomaryovbswartz: I can inform our devs, I am not the owner of gerrit commit15:19
bswartzvponomaryov: ty15:19
bill_azbswartz:  I have been discussing it with others on the team15:19
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
bill_azbswartz:  we have some things coming in gpfs 4.1 in the spring that will help w/ multitenancy15:19
caitlin56bswartz: by "tunneled" do you mean some form of "virtFS"?15:19
navneetmine is singn15:19
bswartzSo just to recap, many clustered filesystems such as ceph and gluster doesn't have facilities to provide "virtual servers" on different tenant networks15:20
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
bswartzThese clustered filesystems assume full network connectivity between the client and every server node15:20
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
caitlin56bswartz: I believe the fundamental issue is who deals with tenant users. The "virtFS" approach puts this on the Hypervisor, the virtual server approach puts it on the file server.15:21
bswartzcaitlin56: yes15:21
gregsfortytwo1that's part 1, part 2 is the networking constraints imposed by the full connectivity bswartz mentioned15:22
caitlin56My evaluation is that relying on the hypervisor a) will add a minimum of one year to the project and b) doesn't truly secure the files even then.15:22
gregsfortytwo1bill_az, I assume gpfs also requires connectivity to every node, right?15:22
bswartzso for clustered filesystems that aren't able to create a virtual-server-per-tenant, due to the number of network interfaces involved, we need a hypervisor-mediated approach to secure multitenancy15:22
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
bswartzthat could mean virtfs, or NFS-over-PPP, or NFS-over-vsock15:23
caitlin56Nobody is *unable* to do a virtual server per tenant, they just haven't done it yet.15:23
bill_azgregsfortytwo1:  yes -thats correct15:23
gregsfortytwo1caitlin56: if "server" — implying one — is nonsensical in your architecture you're unable15:24
bswartzcaitlin56: I think the issue is the number of network interfaces involved -- it's simply impractical15:24
caitlin56Tunneling NFS with less-than-a-tenant-network sounds like a simpler approach than virtFS.15:24
gregsfortytwo1we are all able to implement multienancy even if we haven't, but that's not the biggest issue from Manila's perspective15:24
bill_azgregsfortytwo1:  but we plan to limit access through isolated filesystems and encryption keys15:24
bswartzif you have a 200 node ceph cluster, you can't create 200 additional virtual network interfaces for every tenant15:24
*** dcahill has quit IRC15:25
caitlin56But even with tunneled NFS, the server is going to have to do per-tenant authentication, which I presume they are also incapable of doing today.15:25
gregsfortytwo1bill_az: yeah, that's essentially the path Ceph is walking down, though not very quickly15:25
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:25
bswartzcaitlin56: the theory would be to create a NFS-to-ceph bridge, or an NFS-to-glusterFS bridge15:26
bill_azgregsfortytwo1:  it will be tough for us for icehouse - but should have that for j15:26
bswartzthe NFS itself would have no authentication15:26
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
caitlin56That's fine. That's a vendor provided proxy. Effectively a virtual server.15:26
gregsfortytwo1caitlin56: no, we can handle that already in most of the stack; not sure about gluster; sounds like gpfs can/will15:26
bswartzfortunately bad security is something NFS is very good at15:26
caitlin56gregfortytwo: my main concern is avoiding an openstack managed common UID/GID pool that everyone maps to.15:27
vbellurgregsfortytwo1: gluster can handle that too15:27
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
*** navneet has quit IRC15:28
gregsfortytwo1caitlin56: ah, hadn't even gotten to that issue yet in my head :)15:29
bswartzokay so I'm glad we're all thinking about the issue here -- tunneled FS support will need to come soon after the full network connectivity style of multitenant support15:29
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:29
bswartzissues*15:29
caitlin56question: does it need to be a lib, or can it just be a NAS proxy?15:29
bswartzthose are the 2 main roadblocks to allowing various storage vendors to write functional backends15:29
bswartzthe actual implementation of the bridge/proxy will need to run on the compute node -- whether it's a manila-agent, or changes to nova, or some library -- I'm not sure about taht15:30
bswartzfor a prototype we should keep the code in manila15:30
bswartzlong term it might make sense to host it elsewhere -- especially if it's generically useful outside of manila15:31
caitlin56So this would be a pluggable library that ran in the same context as the manilla agent?15:31
bswartzI want to be careful with the term "manila agent" because it could mean a lot of different things15:31
caitlin56You would want it to be on a path that made sense for bulk data transfer - preferably "close" to the guest.15:32
bswartzthe idea of automatic mounts inside the nova instances is still interesting to many -- and those may necessitate a different kind of agent15:32
bswartzbut absolutely it can/should run on the compute node15:33
*** ben_duyujie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
bswartzpossibly "manila-bridge" or "manila-gateway" would be a more descriptive term15:33
caitlin56bswartz: proxying TCP connections is something compatible with the current infrastructure. Passing full file-systems through hypervisors will be a lot more work.15:33
bswartzcaitlin56: we're talking about the later not the former15:34
bswartzI'm aware that it will be real work15:34
caitlin56bswartz: distinguishing between manila-bridge (control plane) vs. manila-gateway (user-plane) sounds like a good idea to me.15:34
bswartzanyways today I just wanted to lay out the priorities15:35
*** yportnova_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:36
bswartz1) get the neutron code working so we can do full network multitenancy15:36
caitlin56I first looked at NAS proxies for VMs two years ago, and concluded that intercepting at the network layer was more feasible than at the FS-operation layer.15:36
bswartz2) implement some tunneling/virtfs code to support mediated multitenancy15:36
bswartz3) implement the generic driver15:36
*** betsy has quit IRC15:36
caitlin56I feared that even if Xen and KVM adopted "virtFS" it would take two years to deploy. In those 2 years there has been no progress on adopting a virtFS API.15:36
bswartzcaitlin56: I'd be curious to know why that is -- let's take that discussion offline15:37
*** the_real_kp has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
bswartzregarding virtfs -- if that turns out to be a blocker than NFSv3-over-vsock may be a faster path to get something working15:37
gregsfortytwo1s/offline/to #openstack-manila? :)15:38
caitlin56Let each proxy decide whether to support NFSv3 and/or NFSv4.15:38
bswartzthere are lots of technologies that can be applied here -- I'm confident we'll find something that works15:38
caitlin56or for that matter CIFS.15:38
*** aignatov has quit IRC15:40
bswartzcaitlin56: we're going to have to write these proxies ourselves though -- I'm not eager to take on tons of work15:40
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
caitlin56Correct, these are pluggable proxies. Someone has to provide their own proxy.15:40
bswartzIf NFSv3 works as a bridge protocol, I think it will be hard to argue that there's a significant advantage to using something like cifs or v415:40
caitlin56Am I correct that neither CEPH or Gluster would want soeone else writing the proxies to access their networks?15:41
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
bswartzcaitlin56: I think you're incorrect15:41
bswartzI should be the job of manila to provide the glue15:41
gregsfortytwo1no reason to independently implement setting up an nfs server instance ;)15:41
bswartzmy vision is to implement one thing that works for everyone15:42
caitlin56So you want a manila coded proxy that maps UID/GIDs for NFSv3 to NFSv3?15:42
bswartzonce we have a gateway of sorts that runs on the compute node, it shouldn't matter what's on the actual backend -- as long as the compute node can mount it, it can be tunneled through to the guest15:42
bswartzcaitlin56: I don't want any UID/GID mapping to occur15:43
bswartzif we do this correctly, it should be safe to do no mapping15:43
caitlin56Another form of proxy would translate Any-NAS-Protocol to My-backends-proprietary-protocol.15:43
aostapenkoin lxc implementation we can mount directly to vms15:44
aostapenkowe will can :)15:44
bswartzokay so we have some conflicting ideas here15:44
bswartzmaybe my vision will not work out15:45
bswartzcan we at least agree on the priorities I mentioned?15:45
bswartzthose who are interested in the tunneling approach should probably form a working group and hash out the issues15:46
caitlin56If you aren't doing UID/GID mapping then you would have to trust the gateway to do mount authentication. Then all you need to map to a universal pool are the mounts.15:46
*** vponomaryov has quit IRC15:46
*** vponomaryov1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
*** aostapenko has quit IRC15:46
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
bswartzI'm interested in the tunneled approach working correctly, so I'll organize those discussions15:47
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
* caitlin56 is interested in both models - could see implementing either on our end.15:47
bswartzI suspect that we might be making this harder than it needs to be though15:47
*** aostapenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** achirko_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
bswartzMy instinct is that we should write a prototype first, and then discover all the ways that it's wrong15:48
vbellurbswartz: priorities seem fine to me15:48
caitlin56You can make it simpler if you just state the caveat that a gateway solution requires trusting the gateway.15:48
bswartzcaitlin56: oh yes, absolutely15:48
*** achirko has quit IRC15:49
vbellurbswartz: +1 to the prototype15:49
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC15:49
bswartzcaitlin56: the gateway approach is akin to how you must trust the hypervisor to faithfully present block devices to you15:49
bill_azbswartz:  +1 - get the simlest --realistic-- prototype working asap as a model and to help discussion15:49
jcorbinbswartz: +1 to the prototype15:49
bswartzthis "manila-gateway" thing would be running on the compute node, and it would be part of the cloud infrastructure -- hidden from the tenant's view15:50
caitlin56+1, but we should not wait onthe multi-tenant network solution.15:50
gregsfortytwo1the gateway would be essentially the generic implementation, plus some holes that different drivers can plug in order to set up their own backends, right?15:50
bswartzthe tenant would have no choice but to trust it15:50
vbellurgregsfortytwo1: sounds like a good model15:51
caitlin56bswartz: the multi-tenant network approach with virtual servers avoids needing to trust the compute host.15:51
bswartzgregsfortytwo1: the gateway is really a get-out-of-jail-free card for backends that can't connect themselves directly to tenant networks on account of the limitted-number-of-network-interfaces problem15:51
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
bswartzcaitlin56: yeah I believe that's the best method for backends than can support it -- it's just that not all can15:52
bswartzin fact it's come to my attention that even some more traditional NFS-based storage devices (I'm thinking of Isolon) can't directly support multitenancy, and may need something like this to work in public cloud environments15:53
caitlin56bswartz: if the server trusts the gateway to mount only exports approved by the correct authentication server then you only need a single LAN netowrk between the compute hosts and the file servers.15:53
bswartzcaitlin56: yes that's the idea15:53
bswartzokay since we're nearly out of time15:54
bswartz#topic open discussion15:54
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:54
bswartzdoes anyone else have another topic that I didn't bring up?15:54
bswartzwow that quieted things down15:55
bill_azbswartz:  is there a summary of manila activities at summit?15:55
*** julim has quit IRC15:55
bswartzbill_az: yes15:55
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
bswartzas I mentioned at the beginning, we have a unconference session which went well15:56
bswartzwe had* a unconference session15:56
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:56
bswartzand we also got together for drinks and I managed to get my boss to pay the bar tab15:56
bill_azbswartz: sorry - i missed the first few minutes - is there minutes or summary published?15:56
bswartzthanks to everyone who showed up -- it's always great to meet face to face before we go off and spend 6 months coding together15:57
vbellurbswartz: thanks for the drinks! :)15:57
bill_azbswartz:  sorry I missed both!  (especially drinks...)15:57
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC15:57
*** ashaikh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
bswartzand I can't tell you how many people grabbed me personally in the hallways to talk about manila15:58
*** achirko_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
bswartzthe interest level is high15:58
bswartzwe need to move fast while we have momentum15:58
*** davenoveck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
vbellurbswartz:  +115:58
*** allyn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
bswartzI'll be talking to TC members about the incubation request -- we should have an answer on tuesday15:59
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
bill_azbswartz:  that all sounds good - Thanks15:59
bswartzand with that we're out of time15:59
glenngLet's hope,15:59
bswartzthanks everyone15:59
vbellurthanks all15:59
*** bill_az has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
bswartz#endmeeting15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 14 15:59:51 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:59
*** jcorbin has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2013/manila.2013-11-14-15.01.html15:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2013/manila.2013-11-14-15.01.txt15:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2013/manila.2013-11-14-15.01.log.html15:59
*** kevinconway has quit IRC16:00
*** glenng has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** gregsfortytwo1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** caitlin56 has quit IRC16:00
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** pdmars has quit IRC16:00
*** xyang1 has quit IRC16:00
*** michsmit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** vbellur has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** amytron has quit IRC16:02
*** bswartz has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** natishalom has quit IRC16:04
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
*** aratim2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
banixLooks like the Group-based policy meeting is not happening today; Kyle had sent out an email yesterday that we may skip this week meeting.16:05
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** pdmars has quit IRC16:06
*** lucasagomes has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** pdmars has quit IRC16:09
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** michsmit has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:11
*** brents has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
banixSo let us meet next week the same time (1600 UTC) on this channel for the first meeting of the Group-based Policy sub-team. Meanwhile please use the dev mailing list to discuss any issues. Thanks. Mohammad.16:12
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** rcallawa has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** shadower_ is now known as shadower16:13
*** nicole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
hemanthravibanix: Isn't the Group-based policy meeting on even weeks, is there one scheduled for next week16:17
*** allyn has quit IRC16:17
*** nicole is now known as Guest1347016:17
*** natishalom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
banixhemanthravi: No it is weekly on Thursdays at 1600 UTC16:18
*** Guest13470 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
banixhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Neutron_Group_Policy_Sub-Team_Meeting16:19
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:19
*** aratim2 has quit IRC16:20
*** jmontemayor_ has quit IRC16:25
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:28
*** mjbright_ has quit IRC16:30
*** Uri_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC16:32
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC16:34
*** dcahill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** japplewhite has quit IRC16:35
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
*** ruhe has quit IRC16:45
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC16:50
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs16:50
*** Uri_ has quit IRC16:54
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
*** aignatov has quit IRC17:00
*** HenryG has quit IRC17:01
*** amytron has quit IRC17:02
*** davenoveck has quit IRC17:04
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:04
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** NikitaKonovalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** zane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC17:07
*** rudrarug_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC17:09
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** vkmc has quit IRC17:10
*** NikitaKonovalov has quit IRC17:21
*** NikitaKonovalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** hub_cap_ is now known as hub_cap17:24
*** gkleiman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
*** kevinconway has quit IRC17:24
*** pdmars has quit IRC17:25
*** rudrarug_ is now known as rudrarugge17:29
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk17:29
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC17:40
*** amytron has quit IRC17:40
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:43
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
*** yidclare has quit IRC17:46
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** yidclare has quit IRC17:48
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
*** the_real_kp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** mattf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
SergeyLukjanovsavanna team meeting will be here in 10 mins17:56
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away17:57
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs17:58
*** rnirmal has quit IRC17:58
*** derekh has quit IRC17:59
*** aignatov has quit IRC17:59
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** alazarev has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
SergeyLukjanovhi savanna folks18:05
alazarevo/18:05
NikitaKonovalovhi18:05
aignatovHi, Sergey!18:05
*** bill_ has quit IRC18:05
crobertsrhhi18:06
mattfo/18:06
SergeyLukjanovlet's start the meeting18:06
SergeyLukjanov#startmeeting savanna18:06
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 14 18:06:46 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:06
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:06
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:06
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'savanna'18:06
SergeyLukjanov#topic Agenda18:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:07
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda18:07
SergeyLukjanov#topic Action items from the last meeting18:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from the last meeting (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:07
SergeyLukjanovACTION: aignatov to start retrospective discussion18:07
aignatovas far as i remember I should pick up one thing from what didn't work well18:08
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
aignatovand initiate the discussion18:08
aignatov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/Release_0.3_Retrospective18:08
aignatovjust posted retrospective page18:08
SergeyLukjanovit's about already achieved results18:09
*** the_real_kp has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
SergeyLukjanovlet's discuss it later on the meeting if you have no results right now18:09
SergeyLukjanovI'll add section to the meeting agenda18:09
aignatovok18:10
SergeyLukjanovthere are no other action items from last meetings18:10
mattfthat'll give the rest of us time to swap those pages back in too18:10
SergeyLukjanov#topic Summit results18:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit results (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:10
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Icehouse/Etherpads#Savanna18:10
SergeyLukjanovhere are the etherpads from the savanna design summity18:11
mattfnice job running the design sessions btw18:11
SergeyLukjanovmattf, thank you18:11
SergeyLukjanovthank you all guys for etherpads preparation help18:12
aignatovI think we should see at summary sections,right and sections marked yellow18:12
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:12
aignatovcrobertsh and tmckay did you get guys Savanna t-shirts from mattf? ;)18:13
mattfnot yet18:13
crobertsrhI have not yet got mine, but I'm not local to his office18:13
* mattf just got home ~24 hours ago18:13
crobertsrhI suspect it is on the way :)18:13
SergeyLukjanovmattf, oh, I've return home about 24 hours ago too18:14
SergeyLukjanov:)18:14
*** natishalom has quit IRC18:14
mattfi'm hoping to put them in the mail this week (err, tomorrow?)18:15
aignatovSergey, what are our plans with these etherpads - will we write one more document with results, send to ML and create needed bps?18:15
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, exactly18:15
*** ruhe has quit IRC18:16
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, we have several subtopics, I think I prepare joined results overview and send them to ML18:16
aignatovok, great18:17
SergeyLukjanovhm, looks like nothing to discuss more on this topic right no, I think that we'll eventually cover on following meetings allquestions from design summit18:17
SergeyLukjanov#topic News / updates18:17
*** openstack changes topic to "News / updates (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:17
SergeyLukjanovguys, please18:17
SergeyLukjanovno news from my side18:17
mattfopenstack summit in hong kong -- that happened...18:17
SergeyLukjanovonly double jet lag :)18:18
aignatovjmaron, here? It seems issue with hadoop log dir is fixed by Vadim's patch18:18
crobertsrhI've been implementing "download job binary" in the dashboard.  Small feature, but something that was on my list for awhile.  I have a few other minor enhancements for the UI that I'll be getting to next week.18:18
SergeyLukjanovbtw there a lot of cool bars in HKG with awesome views18:18
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
SergeyLukjanovany other news/updates?18:19
aignatovcrobertsrh, thx, in the design tracks about edp we decided to get UI better from EDP perspective18:20
crobertsrhSounds great.  I'll take a look at the etherpad.18:20
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** homegrown has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
SergeyLukjanovok, let's move on18:21
SergeyLukjanov#topic Roadmap cleanup / update18:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Roadmap cleanup / update (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:21
SergeyLukjanovlooks like that's time to rename 1.0 to Icehouse ;)18:21
mattf+218:21
aignatov+218:21
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/Roadmap18:21
SergeyLukjanovok18:22
*** NikitaKonovalov has quit IRC18:22
SergeyLukjanovI hope that we'll understand teams throughput for I in few weeks and cleanup roadmap/bps for it18:22
mattfFedora & RDO integration are arguably in for 0.3. we'll keep enhancing the integration, but the base work is done.18:22
SergeyLukjanovcorrect18:23
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
SergeyLukjanovbtw Icehouse release date is April, 1718:24
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icehouse_Release_Schedule18:24
aignatovand Icehouse-1 on Dec 518:25
SergeyLukjanovyep18:25
aignatovI think we should plan what will be included tin icehouse-118:25
mattf+118:25
aignatovakuznetsov, here?18:26
akuznetsovyes18:26
SergeyLukjanovyeah, it looks like that we have only few weeks to make patches for icehouse-118:26
aignatovwill you send external hdfs support?18:26
*** pcm_ has quit IRC18:26
SergeyLukjanovexternal hdfs, edp in hdp, polished trusts, swift auth url fix18:27
akuznetsovI will do it tommorrow18:27
mattfreviewing swift auth atm, sergey is quick18:27
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
SergeyLukjanovakuznetsov, great18:28
SergeyLukjanovlet's collect ideas about icehouse-1 plans till the next meeting18:28
aignatovalazarev, here? today we realised that problem with Hive could be fixed by changing the swift patch for hadoop by the following way - removing credentials from core-site and add the ability for Hadoop using tenant id and authenticating using it without credentilas18:28
aignatovsomething like that18:29
alazarevhere18:29
SergeyLukjanovthere is a problem with tokens - they could expire18:29
alazarevand how to authenticate without credentials?18:30
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, the only way is to use trusts and obtain tokens using them from swift18:31
SergeyLukjanovbut it'll require some service user credentials in swift too18:31
SergeyLukjanovsounds very comple18:31
SergeyLukjanovcomplex18:31
akuznetsovpossible we should consider oAuth mechanize for this18:32
alazarevagree, sounds complex18:32
*** lblanchard has quit IRC18:32
aignatovyep, the problem is still here :(18:32
alazarevis bug filed for a problem? where can I find more details?18:32
SergeyLukjanovI don't know the current oauth impl status18:32
SergeyLukjanov#topic General discussion18:32
*** openstack changes topic to "General discussion (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:32
SergeyLukjanovjspeidel, here?18:33
aignatovalazarev, I'm looking for it18:35
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
mattfaignatov, i'm reading over the retrospective and think we could effectively take on bp lifecycle and bug-scrub days for icehouse18:37
crobertsrhYes, +1 for bug-scrub days18:37
SergeyLukjanovyep, we'll need some18:38
aignatovmattf, exactly, ++18:38
SergeyLukjanovlet's have one on the next week18:38
SergeyLukjanovwhat's about Tue?18:38
SergeyLukjanovNov, 1918:38
aignatov+18:39
*** docaedo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
* mattf imagines team scrubbing and bp management will also help w/ collaboration improvement18:40
SergeyLukjanovok, if there are no objections than we'll have bug/bp scrub/cleanup day next Tue18:41
mattftmckay, crobertsrh, ^^?18:41
tmckaysounds good to me18:41
crobertsrhTuesday is great for me18:41
aignatovHortonworks guys here? Will they attend Tue bug-scrub?18:42
mattfif you guys want to do it earlier in the day, i can do 9:30-10:30ET or 12:00ET (helps our west coast friends)18:42
mattflet's ping them in email18:42
aignatovET is what in UTC?18:43
* mattf looks it up18:43
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
mattfi think it's -5 atm18:44
*** coolsvap has quit IRC18:44
mattfit's currently 1:45ET18:44
SergeyLukjanovusually it's a all-day event when we'll communicate using irc and post comments to the bugs about their actual state18:44
mattfhttp://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=4318:45
mattfSergeyLukjanov, hmm, how do you usually do a bug scrub?18:45
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC18:46
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul18:46
mattf...what's the process you've used in the past?18:46
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:46
*** Guest13470 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
aignatovmattf, btw did you resolve issue with '16 of 20 core used'? ;)18:46
*** Guest13470 has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** Guest13470 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
mattfaignatov, i think so. i've not been able to run my latest test.18:47
SergeyLukjanovwe should start from cleaning all bugs18:47
mattfi've a very strong feeling it is pebkac18:47
SergeyLukjanovall bugs should be rechecked/triaged and their statuses should be updated18:48
SergeyLukjanovto sync our efforts we'll use #savanna18:48
aignatov mattf, what is pebkac?18:48
mattfaignatov, basically i think my flavor was too big and during provisioning i ran over quota. rollback cleaned up resulting in 0 used when i would go and look after getting the error.18:48
ruhemattf, they invented abbreviation even for this :)18:48
mattfaignatov, problem exists between keyboard and chair -- user error18:49
aignatovxD18:49
mattfSergeyLukjanov, i imagine the rechecking will be a time consuming component18:49
SergeyLukjanov:)18:49
SergeyLukjanovyep18:50
SergeyLukjanovso, I hope that most part of savanna folks will participate in it18:50
tmckaylooks like I only have a meeting on Tues from 10:30-11:30 EST, so I can pay attention to #savanna for bug scrub18:50
mattfaignatov, oh, jetlag... i did retest and it was indeed quota overrun during provisioning. i was never successful at starting the cluster because i am using a fedora image and HDP Plugin only supports CentOS18:50
tmckayall day :)18:50
* mattf just checked and the cluster has been in "configuring" for 6 days18:51
SergeyLukjanovit's named "bugday" in OpenStack18:51
mattfSergeyLukjanov, is there a wiki page about it?18:51
SergeyLukjanov#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugDays18:51
SergeyLukjanovthere are no details18:52
SergeyLukjanovbut in few words18:52
SergeyLukjanovthat's a day when volunteers rechecks bugs and updates their statuses using irc to sync18:52
mattfThe next day will happen on July 12th, 201218:52
mattfoof18:52
tmckayis there food? ;-)18:53
aignatovmattf, well at least now you know what problem is18:53
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
SergeyLukjanovyep, they sending emails to ML about bug days sometimes18:53
SergeyLukjanovw/o any schedule afaik18:53
SergeyLukjanovon-demand event18:53
mattfaignatov, and it's a difficult to diagnose error, esp when half asleep18:53
aignatovbug day doesn't touch blueprints, right?18:53
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
SergeyLukjanovI think let's start from bugs18:54
*** pdmars has quit IRC18:54
ruheaccording to #link  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints blueprints is PTL's responsibility18:54
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
mattfif we start from blueprints and roadmap we have a chance at prioritizing bugs for the scrub18:54
SergeyLukjanovruhe, yep18:54
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
SergeyLukjanovbefore cleaning bps we should finalize plans for icehouse-118:54
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
SergeyLukjanovlet's start from the bug day and I'll clean current BPs18:55
* mattf checks how many bugs exist atm18:55
SergeyLukjanovand we discuss plans for the i-1 at the next irc18:55
mattfhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/savanna18:56
mattf62 atm18:56
SergeyLukjanovyep, that's enough to check18:56
SergeyLukjanov#info Nov, 19 Savanna bug day18:56
SergeyLukjanovI'll send it to ML18:57
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:57
SergeyLukjanovand ping HW folks18:57
mattftmckay, crobertsrh, you could skip that call on tues18:57
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
mattfErikB, welcome18:57
tmckaymattf, okey doke18:57
crobertsrh:)18:57
SergeyLukjanovthat's a all day long event, so, call isn't the problem :)18:57
ErikBmattf, hey there18:57
SergeyLukjanovErikB, o/18:58
mattfErikB, we're talking about doing a full day bug scrub on the 19th18:58
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, don't say that, give us an excuse ;-)18:58
ErikBHi Everyone18:58
aignatovhi, ErikB, did you get Savanna t-shirt from jspiedel? ;)18:58
mattfaignatov, lol18:58
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
ErikBaignatov, I did. It's very cool. thank you18:58
aignatovyep, mattf, the same question at the end :)18:59
mattfErikB, the bug scrub would be all day triage (rechecking, update details, prioritize) bugs18:59
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, oops, on the other side, there shouldn't be any calls to have a good bug day ;)18:59
mattfSergeyLukjanov, lol18:59
*** jmaron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** jspeidel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
ErikBdid we join the meeting an hour late?19:00
tmckaygot it, bug day is the priority19:00
aignatovErikB, yes19:00
jspeidelsorry, we had a time change19:00
jspeideldidn't account for that19:00
ErikBMy apologies, I did not adjust for time change on our end...19:00
jmarondoh!  I knew I hated going off DST...19:00
mattfErikB, think of it as 167 hours early19:00
ErikB;-)19:01
mattfnirmal around?19:01
SergeyLukjanovwe're out of time19:01
SergeyLukjanovthank you all19:01
mattfciao19:02
*** jspeidel has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** tmckay has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
SergeyLukjanov#info JFYI you can always use openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org mailing lists and #savanna irc channel to find us and ask your questions19:02
SergeyLukjanov#endmeeting19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 14 19:02:30 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-11-14-18.06.html19:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-11-14-18.06.txt19:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-11-14-18.06.log.html19:02
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
ErikBdid you guys see this: http://docs.openstack.org/ops/ ?19:06
*** twoputt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** twoputt_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** banix has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:08
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
mattfrnirmal, missed you, daylight savings change. we're back over in #savanna19:13
*** mattf has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
*** ben_duyujie has quit IRC19:13
rnirmalah shoot I was waiting for another 15 mins :(19:13
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:14
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk19:14
*** yportnova_ has quit IRC19:20
*** ruhe has quit IRC19:25
*** betsy has quit IRC19:26
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
*** japplewhite has quit IRC19:33
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs19:34
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:35
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:36
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
*** mjbright_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:40
*** coolsvap has quit IRC19:42
*** rossella_s has quit IRC19:49
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:49
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** brianr is now known as rosmaita19:50
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
*** ErikB has quit IRC19:51
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk19:52
*** sballe has quit IRC19:54
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:55
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away19:57
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
markwashglance people here today?19:58
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
rosmaitahi mark20:00
markwashgreetings folks!20:00
nikhilo/20:00
ameadehey20:00
markwashlets get this party started :-)20:00
markwash#startmeeting glance20:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 14 20:00:55 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'20:00
markwashso who all do we have here today?20:01
ameade\0/20:01
*** tpatil has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
esheffield_o/20:01
* nikhil .20:01
zhiyanhi20:01
esheffield_ameade is really excited to be here20:01
rosmaitahi20:01
*** ashwini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
dosaboy\o20:02
ameadeesheffield_: nah, i was just stretching20:02
flaper87o/20:02
markwashtwoputt: flwang: ?20:02
markwash(just thought I'd highlight them in case they're around)20:02
markwashokay let's get started!20:02
*** sballe has quit IRC20:02
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov20:02
markwash#topic Summit Review!20:03
dosaboyzhiyan: morning ;)20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit Review! (Meeting topic: glance)"20:03
*** _SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov20:03
zhiyandosaboy: :) hey20:03
markwashwe had all of our sessions on Tuesday20:03
nikhilw00t20:03
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov20:03
*** _SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov20:03
markwashand honestly I have been working on the summaries sporadically since then20:04
markwashand so far I only need to finish up the taskflow one20:04
markwashthen I'll send it all out the list20:04
*** aignatov has quit IRC20:04
flaper87awesome!20:04
markwashthe problem has been that summarizing is very thought provoking, so I end up sitting there thinking instead of typing20:04
flaper87hahahaha, indeed it is20:04
flaper87I think I spent the rest of the summit and my flight back having ideas of things to do20:05
markwashzhiyan: I think you added the note about figuring out what we're focusing on for this release, are there any notes you want to make on that front?20:06
zhiyanmarkwash: i have a draft list for myself.20:06
zhiyanbut i'd like to see your list first.20:07
markwashthere are a few ideas that have come up that weren't in our discussions, but were suggested by them20:07
markwashI suppose those ought to be blueprints as well20:08
markwashokay, well I'll get that sent out today to the ML, please read and respond in case I'm still missing something that was going on in the talks20:08
markwashnext topic20:08
markwash#topic Glance Mini Summit (Tentative) Plans20:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance Mini Summit (Tentative) Plans (Meeting topic: glance)"20:08
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:08
markwashToday I'll be sending out another email seeking feedback and interest in a Glance mid-cycle meetup / mini summit20:09
flaper87wooooooooohoooooooooooooo!!!!20:09
markwashtentatively, the plan would be sometime in late January, and we would probably hold it in some small conference space in the Washington DC area20:09
ameadein hawaii right?20:09
ameadewooo20:09
ameadeaww20:09
nikhil+120:09
markwashnot sure how well that works for folks. . . but be sure to provide feedback in your responses20:10
* nikhil quickly checks airbnb for some rental options20:10
markwashany questions about the meetup?20:10
ashwiniadd the link to the form here?20:11
markwashsure that would be great20:11
markwash#link https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11DjkNAzVAdtMCPrsLiyjA7ck33jnexmKqlqaCl5olO8/viewform20:11
markwashthat's the form you can use to indicate your interest20:11
markwashagain I'll be sending that out to everyone on the ML later20:12
markwashsince hopefully we'll get some interest from Nova folks and people outside the core group (that comes to the meeting :-) )20:12
markwashall right, moving on20:12
flaper87awesome20:12
markwash#topic Review Responsiveness20:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Responsiveness (Meeting topic: glance)"20:12
ameadeyes, there are some trivial patches that have just been sitting out there20:13
markwashI'd like us to take some time today to discuss ways we can improve how we process and handle reviews20:13
markwashfor some context, here are our recent reviewstats links20:13
markwash#link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/glance-reviewers-30.txt20:14
markwash#link http://www.russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/glance-openreviews.html20:14
flaper87yeah, I took a look at those today. I've been a very bad reviewer lately20:14
markwashi think those numbers are helpful if we don't take them too far. . its possible to go overboard with metrics20:14
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
flaper87so, I think we need to dedicate some more time to review patch of new contributors as well and make sure they leave with enough information20:15
flaper87I also think we need to have a plan for this development cycle and then focus a bit more on the patches that help moving that plan forward20:16
ameadewe may want to put some process in place20:16
flaper87that being said, we definitely need more reviews. At least, I have to dedicate more time to it20:16
markwashI think a plan makes sense. . and I think some of the numbers being a bit bad is actually just a long hangover from focusing on getting in some core priorities20:17
ameademarkwash: do we want to do something like nova does? or reinstate formal review day assignments?20:17
*** julim has quit IRC20:17
markwashthere are some changes going into reviewstats soon that should probably help us get a grip on about how many reviews are needed per day20:18
flaper87I don't think a 'review process' is what we need, we just need to keep an eye on those stats and make sure we don't leave patches un-reviewed.20:18
flaper87and that the reviews help moving Glance plan forward20:18
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul20:18
markwashameade: maybe. . but gosh I kinda hope we can avoid it personally20:18
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
markwashlifeless said something at the summit to me that I thought was pretty great20:19
markwashreviewing should be like brushing your teeth20:19
markwashjust a habit that you do 3 times every day20:19
flaper87yeah20:19
ameadeyeah20:19
flaper87and it's very personal20:19
flaper87I mean, the workflow20:19
flaper87and the way people organize the queue20:20
zhiyanmarkwash: +120:20
markwashflaper87: yeah I think organizing the queue is a big question20:20
markwashso on the one hand, I was wondering a lot about top vs bottom feeding in terms of what to review first20:20
markwashbut both of those have some casualties as well20:20
markwashfor example, Dirk Mueller's patches that recently landed20:21
markwashhe had these huge cleanup patches20:21
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs20:21
markwashthat kept catching rebase conflicts20:21
markwashsince they weren't high priority, they didn't really get picked out at the top20:21
markwashbut since he had to keep uploading to fix conflicts, it never fell to the bottom exactly either20:21
flaper87In those cases, a straight ping is worth it20:21
flaper87imho20:22
ameadehow are any of these thoughts different that what we are doing now?20:22
markwashyes, and maybe we just need to encourage that behavior from submitters20:22
ameadethat sounds terrible, do you mean pinging every time they have a patch sitting around?20:23
markwashI wonder if we just push extra hard to get our queue length smaller, it might be easier to just scan the list and see what is most important20:23
markwashameade: only every time they've had a patch sitting around for 3-4 weeks with no reviews :-)20:23
ameadehaha gotcha20:23
markwashameade: well, for one difference, right now we're averaging about 1.5 reviews per day per active reviewer over the past 30 days20:24
markwashmaybe that number needs to be 4 per day to shrink the queue for a while20:24
ameadeas long as we review faster than they need it20:25
flaper87yeah!20:25
nikhilthat makes me wonder if I should pester people for reviewing some else's patches20:26
markwashnikhil: hmm, thats a good point20:26
nikhiland get some credit poits for it :)20:26
flaper87so, we've never had a bad-reviewers reputation, AFAIK. This is good. However, since we've getting more contributors and new exiting things going on, we may want to start dedicating a bit more time to it20:26
nikhilsee this was all planned ;=)20:26
*** markmcclain has quit IRC20:27
zhiyanmarkwash: do you think every patch should have a bug id or bp ? except oslo sync-up changes? i mean what's the rule to make sure if a patch is important or not, sometime i need a priority.20:27
markwashif we see some reviews that look +2 to us, but need another core and might soon catch a rebase conflict, it would be a good idea to ping other folks in #openstack-glance20:27
markwashzhiyan: yeah, I kinda do think we need that. but on the other hand if we don't have a good system for ensuring those bps/bugs are well written, it might not really help20:28
markwashI've seen a lot of silly bps for oneoff changes in nova20:28
ameadei keep seeing C&P for bug desc and commit msgs20:28
markwashC&P ?20:28
ameadecopy and paste20:28
markwashgross20:29
flaper87ameade: WTF ?20:29
flaper87(plop)20:29
ameadelol20:29
nikhil+1 to what ameade noticed20:29
markwashdo we think we need more core reviewers?20:30
ameadenope20:30
flaper87I don't think so, for now20:30
markwashI for one really wish gerrit would just incorporate the more sensible parts of reviewstats and use that for sorting :-/20:31
ameadewhat do you guys do exactly to figure out what to review?20:32
ameadei usually look at what is sitting aroudn the longest without -1s20:32
markwashI often just drop to the bottom of the list and scan upwards20:32
markwashlately I've been having better luck treating the glance review email notifications as a todo list20:32
markwashbut obviously that latter approach won't fix the backlog20:33
ameademonty taylor had a good email a month or two back about how he organizes reviews in gerrit20:33
* flaper87 bookmarked those links20:33
markwashhmm, I should look at that again20:34
*** esker has quit IRC20:34
markwashgot links?20:34
zhiyani have a todo list, including: 1) review ping, 2) team-room auto notification. 3) which I think important20:34
flaper87I usually start from the bottom and look for patches that fix bugs and or sound like important. Then I do the same for the rest if nothing pops-up20:34
flaper87I pick a bunch of them20:34
flaper87and stick to those as much as possible, in order to be able to give good feedback and not having to refresh my memory everytime I open the review20:35
nikhilflaper87: please share those links with us20:35
* flaper87 looking20:35
ashwiniwhy not have one core reviewer on call per week and set a target for that week20:35
ameadei got the links, i use them all the time..looking for the email online20:36
markwashI'm not sure if anyone else has this problem, but sometimes I look at a review and I"m just like "what? I have no clue what you're doing" but it doesn't really feel like a -1 territory20:36
nikhilI wanted to point out that one thing ameade has done good job in general is to take a deeper look at unit/functional tests while reviewing and would like to encourage in general amogst everyone20:36
zhiyanhehe, i have same feeling20:36
markwashlike maybe I'm just not fully switched to the context of the review20:36
flaper87#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015705.html20:37
flaper87there you go guys20:37
markwashso I'll spend time reading code but then at the end of it I have no comment, and no + or - to add20:37
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
ameadeflaper87: nice20:37
flaper87markwash: if what the patch does is not clear, I think a better commit message is worth it20:38
nikhilmarkwash: I got confused the other day too, when you said not a -1 on the patch we'r reviewing for correcting the locals20:38
flaper87also, a good thing to do is, if we spend some time figuring out what a piece of code does, we could drop a comment there for the next reviewer20:38
flaper87and to double check whether what we figured out is correct or not20:38
ameademarkwash, flaper87: yeah i like to think that if i get confused reading a patch it was for a reason and maybe it could be clearer20:38
nikhilI guess you don't feel strongly about such MPs ? Would you like to encourage the same?20:39
markwashokay cool, souncds like I should be commenting about my confusion if I have any20:39
markwashnikhil: I guess I use +0 sometimes to avoid the stigma of a -120:40
flaper87I prefer -1 that 020:40
markwashbut do you think that leaves submitters more confused?20:40
flaper87at least it shows somebody already took a look at it20:40
ameadeyeah +1 to -120:40
lifelessit's a stock queuing problem20:40
lifelesssorry, responding to ages back20:41
markwashha I hoped I'd summon you!20:41
lifelessif your review queue steady state isn't approximately empty, when a big burst does arrive, you'll be killed20:41
nikhilmarkwash: I guess that might have been a bad example, however sometimes I've observed that submitters don't pay attentions to the review if it's not a -120:41
nikhil(bad example as we'r working with him real time)20:41
markwashnikhil: i think that's good feedback20:41
lifelessyou may be overwhelmed temporarily by a big burst but if there is built up capacity in the team it will go away fairly quickly20:41
ameadewhat other problems to people experience doing reviews?20:43
markwashI think so far, possibly with the exception of my reviews, we haven't had a big problem with review quality20:43
markwashbut if we're making a push for more reviews, its an important thing to keep in mind20:44
zhiyansome time i think it will be better if we have a "global" list which ordered by importance, and reviewers can focus one those changes.. sometime our effort are little scattering..20:44
lifelesszhiyan: why?20:44
markwashyeah I wonder if there is a good place for that?20:44
ameademarkwash: what happend to reviewday?20:44
*** japplewhite has quit IRC20:44
ameadehttps://github.com/dprince/reviewday20:44
lifelessameade: http://status.openstack.org/reviews/20:45
lifelessthe problem with treating reviews as a priority queue20:45
ameadeah there we go20:45
*** yogesh has quit IRC20:45
lifelessis that it assumes there is code we don't want to land20:45
ameadeyeah20:45
ameadestarvation20:45
lifeless-and don't want to even review.20:45
nikhilthe other day iccha, hemanth and I were thinking about pair reviewing20:45
lifelessBut this is false: we're a community, the reviews are something we do ourselves to ourselves to keep quality up20:46
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
nikhil(could be virtual parining too)20:46
lifelessand the burden comes from code we write20:46
ameadefrankly, we just need to review more...doesn't matter what or when, it's all important20:46
zhiyanlifeless: because each reviewers has different review todo list, and some change only has one +2, but it need wait more time to get another one. and sometime, it need rebase manually when it get two +2.20:46
nikhilI feel like sometimes it's hard to understand the basic underlying approach from single point of view20:46
lifelesszhiyan: ok, so the word 'importance' is overloaded :)20:46
nikhilhowever, it helps when you talk it through with someone else20:46
lifelesszhiyan: I'm fully in favor of driving partially reviewed patches all the way to landed before reviewing additional patches20:46
markwashI think there is one good reason for sharing some priority, and that is just that it might help to have a few core folks working in concert to reduce the current backlog20:46
markwashhopefully a priority queue aspect goes away when the queue is small20:47
lifelessfrom a queuing perspective that keeps the average time waiting for reviewers lower20:47
lifelesswhich reduces rework (rebasing, catching up with changing apis etc)20:47
markwashah okay makes sense20:47
markwashis there a good filter for just "this already has a +2 from somebody other than you" in gerrit?20:47
lifelessI think so - see chris jone's little python script20:48
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
flaper87there is20:48
flaper87I think one of the Monty's queries do that20:48
markwashat this point, we've spent about 35 minutes with some really great discussion of this topic20:49
lifelessso one thing that might work with todays gerrit is several different custom searches - one with other +2s, one with +1s, one un-reviewed, and finally check for -1's with the submitter dissenting20:49
markwashare there any 1 or 2 things we all want to do to try to improve over the next week?20:49
* lifeless shuts up :)20:49
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:49
markwashlifeless: no worries, thanks for your suggestions!20:49
nikhilhow about pair reviewing thing?20:50
*** yogesh has quit IRC20:50
nikhilit helped me last night reviewing a patch with zhiyan20:50
nikhilit speeds up the process much faster (thought that was something I was working on)20:51
markwashthat sounds like a fine suggestion20:51
dosaboybeer?20:51
markwashanother I would have, is I know I want to try to review at least 4-5 patches a day at least until the queue goes down20:51
nikhils/thought/though/20:51
ameadedosaboy: +120:51
flaper87dosaboy: beer speeds up reviews, for sure!20:51
flaper87:D20:51
markwash+2 beer20:51
zhiyannikhil: markwash, actually it since nikhil's one just on the top of my todo list :)20:51
ameadei think for me personally, i need to set aside large chunks of time for reviews20:52
* flaper87 too20:52
flaper87also, lets try to review patches already reviewed and then tackle the rest down20:52
ameadei'm so slow at reviewing a lot of times i only get half way through before i am doing something else20:52
nikhilor even flush of +2s ;)20:52
ameadeflaper87: +120:52
*** japplewhite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
zhiyansometime, i hope have a -3 button, to ask committer never push it up :)20:52
markwashhaha20:52
*** pdmars has quit IRC20:52
ameadelol undo20:52
markwashwe do have some persistent reviewers20:53
markwashconstantly restoring after -1 auto-abandon20:53
dosaboyzhiyan: isn't that what the "Do Not Merge" is for?20:53
markwashs/reviewers/submitters20:53
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
*** kevinconway has quit IRC20:53
flaper87dosaboy: nope, that'd be for 'Do not merge and don't, ever, do it again'20:53
flaper87:D20:53
zhiyandosaboy: yes, but author can push next PS also. i mean "blocking" this at here.20:53
dosaboyah ok20:53
zhiyanflaper87: cool20:54
markwash-3 you have lost the internet20:54
markwashokay20:54
nikhil:D20:54
zhiyanhaha20:54
markwashokay, I guess its time for open discussion20:54
zhiyandosaboy: you have some important change want to review, rigtht?20:55
zhiyan4 items, iirc20:55
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC20:55
markwashI'm going to try to just review more, without pushing it to heroic proportions20:55
dosaboywell, i have a few patches that have been around for up to two months20:55
dosaboyi kinda discussed them at ods but they evolve arounbd race conditon fixes for v1 api20:55
rosmaitamarkwash: before reviewing, could you release a new version of python-glanceclient to pypi ?20:56
dosaboywhcih would be supersceded eventaully by a taskflow/statemachine approach20:56
markwash#topic Open Discussion20:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: glance)"20:56
dosaboyso questio is, do we want these to go throught and if so can we please move forwards with them20:56
markwashrosmaita: gah yes I suppose so20:56
markwashdosaboy: hmm, I don't think taskflow will fix anything with v120:56
markwashthe two shall never touch20:56
dosaboye.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50457/20:57
dosaboymarkwash: yeah there is that too20:57
*** gkleiman has quit IRC20:57
dosaboyi was not clear on what the outlook was20:57
dosaboyso i still think we should go wih these patches20:57
*** pdmars has quit IRC20:58
esheffield_rosmaita: +100020:58
*** Barker has quit IRC20:58
dosaboyi'm guessing you guys are gonna take a similar approach to what cinder are doing20:58
markwashdosaboy: sort of, not exactly20:59
markwashcinder already has a remote rpc worker20:59
dosaboyright20:59
markwashthat is located close to some important held state20:59
markwashfor us I think the remote worker will initially be optional20:59
markwashbut also, we'll probably land a good bit of stuff before integrating with taskflow21:00
markwashdepending on the path of least resistence21:00
markwashall right, thanks everybody21:00
markwash#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 14 21:00:46 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2013/glance.2013-11-14-20.00.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2013/glance.2013-11-14-20.00.txt21:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2013/glance.2013-11-14-20.00.log.html21:00
*** nicole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** ashwini has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** nicole is now known as Guest9271821:01
*** Guest13470 has quit IRC21:01
*** tpatil has quit IRC21:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC21:03
*** japplewhite has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:03
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC21:04
*** demorris has quit IRC21:05
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away21:06
*** enikanorov__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC21:08
*** buzztroll has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
*** homegrown has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
*** HenryG has quit IRC21:11
*** pcm_ has quit IRC21:12
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:18
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul21:19
*** julim has quit IRC21:19
s3wongIs this the Neutron IPv6 meeting?21:20
s3wongNever mind, first one next Thursday21:21
*** s3wong has quit IRC21:21
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:23
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk21:24
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** sarob has quit IRC21:28
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** sarob has quit IRC21:31
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away21:31
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul21:31
*** sarob_ has quit IRC21:32
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** zhiyan has quit IRC21:38
*** kraman has quit IRC21:41
*** kraman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:46
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away21:47
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs21:47
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul21:51
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** dprince has quit IRC21:57
*** sballe has quit IRC22:06
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk22:09
*** kin is now known as nikhil__22:10
*** brents has quit IRC22:10
*** venkatesh has quit IRC22:11
*** esheffield_ has quit IRC22:11
*** nikhil has quit IRC22:11
*** hemanth has quit IRC22:11
*** Barker has quit IRC22:12
*** lblanchard has quit IRC22:17
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:30
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:30
*** Barker has quit IRC22:33
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:35
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC22:37
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away22:39
*** amytron has quit IRC22:41
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC22:41
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul22:41
*** Guest92718 has quit IRC22:48
*** buzztroll has quit IRC22:50
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC22:51
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:52
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC22:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** marc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** marc_ is now known as Guest6550023:03
*** julim has quit IRC23:03
*** Guest65500 has quit IRC23:04
*** cweid has quit IRC23:04
*** sballe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:12
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:13
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** sballe has quit IRC23:16
*** alazarev has quit IRC23:20
*** yogesh has quit IRC23:22
*** sacharya has quit IRC23:23
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:23
*** yogesh has quit IRC23:28
*** jmaron has quit IRC23:37
*** zane has quit IRC23:46
*** zane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:46
*** zane has quit IRC23:51
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!