Friday, 2019-09-20

*** mmethot_ has quit IRC00:40
*** mmethot has joined #openstack-manila00:40
*** mmethot has quit IRC00:45
*** mmethot has joined #openstack-manila00:45
*** mmethot has quit IRC00:46
*** mmethot has joined #openstack-manila00:47
*** mmethot has quit IRC00:55
*** mmethot_ has joined #openstack-manila00:55
*** lseki has quit IRC01:14
openstackgerritGhanshyam Mann proposed openstack/manila master: [train][goal] Define new manila-tempest-minimal-lvm-ipv6-only job  https://review.opendev.org/68271601:44
openstackgerritMerged openstack/manila master: Fix _list_view function for count  https://review.opendev.org/67391302:24
*** tinwood has quit IRC02:50
*** tinwood has joined #openstack-manila02:52
*** _mmethot_ has joined #openstack-manila04:41
*** mmethot_ has quit IRC04:41
*** dviroel has quit IRC04:52
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila05:28
*** pcaruana has quit IRC05:53
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin06:36
*** trident has quit IRC06:49
*** trident has joined #openstack-manila07:01
*** trident has quit IRC07:07
*** trident has joined #openstack-manila07:17
*** tosky has joined #openstack-manila07:18
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila07:46
*** e0ne has quit IRC07:59
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila08:24
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:42
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila09:12
openstackgerrithaixin proposed openstack/manila-ui master: Add update share-type name description or public access  https://review.opendev.org/68333609:30
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila09:54
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:02
*** pcaruana has quit IRC10:56
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila11:03
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:24
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila11:29
*** carloss has joined #openstack-manila11:30
*** pcaruana has quit IRC11:42
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-manila11:42
*** dviroel has joined #openstack-manila12:11
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila12:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/manila master: [train][goal] Define new manila-tempest-minimal-lvm-ipv6-only job  https://review.opendev.org/68271613:21
*** sfernand has joined #openstack-manila13:56
*** lseki has joined #openstack-manila14:01
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:06
*** _mmethot_ has quit IRC15:04
*** _mmethot_ has joined #openstack-manila15:05
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila15:08
*** trident has quit IRC15:14
*** trident has joined #openstack-manila15:24
*** trident has quit IRC15:29
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off15:35
*** trident has joined #openstack-manila15:40
*** baojg has joined #openstack-manila15:42
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:19
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-manila16:33
openstackgerritDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Adds new functional tests for share-network-subnets  https://review.opendev.org/67647516:33
gouthamrdviroel: ping re: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676475/14/manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_share_network_subnets.py@21717:16
dviroelgouthamr: hi17:17
gouthamrdviroel: hey! so, i meant to say this: if a share is created without specifying an AZ, the scheduler will find the best one for it - when it does, the share must be created on the corresponding AZ's subnet if one exists, and not default17:17
gouthamrdviroel: it's possible the scheduler picks an AZ not exclusively served by any particular subnet - then ofcourse this check won't matter, if there's no subnet for that AZ, default will be picked - that's intended behavior17:18
dviroelgouthamr: ok, so we agree with the current behavior.17:20
gouthamrdviroel: i don't see that specific assert though?17:20
dviroelgouthamr: let me find17:20
gouthamrdviroel: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676475/15/manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_share_network_subnets.py@238 always yields "a" subnet17:21
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila17:22
gouthamrdviroel: and that isn't enough - i want the test to fail if: the scheduler's chosen an AZ the share network has a subnet dedicated for, but the share is on the default subnet17:22
dviroelgouthamr: you don't think that the assert in line 238 is enough to test these two positive scenarios?17:29
dviroelgouthamr: for sure there are more negative scenarios that we can add17:30
gouthamrhmmm17:33
gouthamrmy bad17:33
gouthamrthat should work dviroel17:33
dviroel=)17:33
dviroelthat == expected_subnet_id assert?17:35
dviroelOh, +1  =)17:36
dviroelgouthamr: did you expect more negative tests?17:36
gouthamrdviroel: nope, thanks for adding the ones i asked for; i think we have pretty good coverage17:37
dviroel\o/17:38
dviroelgouthamr: thanks17:38
* gouthamr is not vponomaryov, but usually channels him during tempest code reviews and tortures dviroel 17:38
gouthamrdviroel: do you run these tests with the dummy driver? or the netapp backend?17:39
gouthamrdviroel: if you run that particular test we're talking about, you should see the behavior i pointed out in the server-side review; i was consistently seeing it - although i didn't dig in to find the place we could fix it - that said you/carloss weren't seeing that issue17:41
dviroelgouthamr: I was using the dummy driver today. We can wait for NetApp CI to vote on this one before moving forward17:42
gouthamrdviroel: the expected "behavior" being: "if a share is created without specifying an AZ, the scheduler will find the best one for it - when it does, the share must be created on the corresponding AZ's subnet if one exists, and not default"17:42
gouthamrdviroel: yes17:43
dviroelgouthamr: agree17:43
dviroelgouthamr: about that behavior that you pointed out, I'll try to reproduce it once again, and ask you questions if I cannot reproduce it.17:45
dviroelgouthamr:  don't want to see this as a bug in the future =)17:46
*** tosky_ has joined #openstack-manila17:48
* dviroel still don't know who is vponomaryov17:49
* carloss never saw him in a meeting or a channel but is used to see his username in a lot of comments in the code xD17:50
*** tosky is now known as Guest8725917:51
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky17:51
*** Guest87259 has quit IRC17:52
gouthamrwe don't say his real name around here17:52
gouthamrdviroel: we should expect that test you added to fail every now and then - we have all these DHSS=True CIs that don't use a pre-created share network - one of them should catch it, if the behavior exists17:54
*** eharney has quit IRC18:05
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:34
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila18:36
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:36
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila18:37
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:41
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila18:52
*** _mmethot_ has quit IRC21:05
*** mmethot_ has joined #openstack-manila21:05
dviroelgouthamr: we don't have two pools configure for manila-cDOT-manila-tempest-plugin-ss job.  So those 2 tests that we were talking about were skipped. We can test this on the DNM job that triggers the replication-ss job.21:31
*** eharney has quit IRC21:39
dviroelor the Dummy driver change21:44
*** carloss has quit IRC22:21
*** sfernand has quit IRC23:25
*** tosky has quit IRC23:28
* dviroel enjoys watch NetApp CI running subnet tests23:44
dviroel\o/ Success23:50
gouthamryeah the dummy driver should catch that23:54
gouthamri'll merge this and lets watch this through the next week23:54
dviroelgouthamr: http://13.56.159.105/logs/76/677576/1/upstream-check/manila-cDOT-replication-ss/cdfaf84/console.html.gz#_2019-09-20_23_35_46_10388423:56
dviroelThe replication-ss job executed those new tests23:56
gouthamrnice, thanks dviroel23:56
dviroelty gouthamr23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!