Thursday, 2015-12-17

*** pgbridge has quit IRC00:02
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila00:14
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila00:16
*** a_ta has quit IRC00:19
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-manila00:21
*** markstur_ has quit IRC00:22
*** lpabon has quit IRC00:38
*** adrianofr has quit IRC01:06
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila01:07
openstackgerritCsaba Henk proposed openstack/manila: glusterfs: document irregular behavior with gluster-nfs on access revocation  https://review.openstack.org/25874501:16
openstackgerritzhongjun proposed openstack/manila: QoS support for shares  https://review.openstack.org/24728601:21
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila01:43
openstackgerritCsaba Henk proposed openstack/manila: glusterfs/vol layout: remove manila-created vols upon delete_share  https://review.openstack.org/23745401:57
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila01:59
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila02:04
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-manila02:06
*** gouthamr has quit IRC02:09
*** chlong has quit IRC02:10
*** chlong has joined #openstack-manila02:22
*** logan- has joined #openstack-manila03:47
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila03:50
*** a_ta has quit IRC03:55
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila03:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-manilaclient: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/25652204:30
*** nidhimittalhada has joined #openstack-manila04:39
nidhimittalhada@bswartz @cknight @vponomaryov @cfouts ...could someone please review manila client change : -https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255802/04:39
*** merooney has quit IRC04:52
*** shausy has joined #openstack-manila05:09
*** mtanino has quit IRC05:30
*** nidhimittalhada has quit IRC05:33
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC05:35
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila05:35
*** gouthamr has quit IRC05:59
*** shausy has quit IRC06:18
*** shausy has joined #openstack-manila06:20
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila06:27
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila06:35
*** shausy has quit IRC06:37
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC06:37
*** shausy has joined #openstack-manila06:38
*** 5EXAAIFVW has joined #openstack-manila06:38
openstackgerritAnkit Agrawal proposed openstack/manila: Remove duplicate keys from dictionary  https://review.openstack.org/25882606:39
openstackgerritdaiki kato proposed openstack/manila: Add space to message in manila/consistency_group/api.py  https://review.openstack.org/25722406:58
*** 5EXAAIFVW has quit IRC07:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila07:01
*** deepakcs has joined #openstack-manila07:10
*** nidhimittalhada has joined #openstack-manila07:11
*** shausy has quit IRC07:22
*** shausy has joined #openstack-manila07:22
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:26
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila07:27
*** tobe has joined #openstack-manila07:27
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila07:29
*** a_ta has quit IRC07:31
nidhimittalhada@vponomaryov:07:33
nidhimittalhadaCan i safely assume that at all times when i fire unmanage on a share, It has "only one" "share instance" behind it .. ????07:33
nidhimittalhada(as multiple share instance come into play when migration is in progress.. can an unmanage command on share come in between ???)07:33
nidhimittalhadacan an unmanage command on share in between when migration on it is progress?07:33
nidhimittalhadasorry again wrong grammar07:33
nidhimittalhadacan an "unmanage" request on share come, when migration on it is progress?07:34
nidhimittalhadahi07:34
nidhimittalhada..07:34
nidhimittalhada..07:34
*** chlong has quit IRC07:36
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Implement export location metadata feature  https://review.openstack.org/25193007:58
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC08:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila08:01
*** nidhimittalhada has quit IRC08:02
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila08:17
*** shausy has quit IRC08:27
*** nidhimittalhada has joined #openstack-manila08:34
nidhimittalhada@vponomaryov: On running tox -epy27 on manila repo -- which is fresh + few of my changes ...08:35
nidhimittalhadai get this http://paste.openstack.org/show/482163/08:35
nidhimittalhadaObtaining file:///opt/stack/manila08:35
nidhimittalhada    Complete output from command python setup.py egg_info:08:35
nidhimittalhada    running egg_info08:35
nidhimittalhada    writing dependency_links to manila.egg-info/dependency_links.txt08:35
nidhimittalhada    error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'manila.egg-info/dependency_links.txt'08:35
nidhimittalhada    ----------------------------------------08:35
nidhimittalhadaCommand "python setup.py egg_info" failed with error code 1 in /opt/stack/manila08:35
nidhimittalhada@vponomaryov: its again some similar reason of not setting up the repo correctly08:36
nidhimittalhadai have run the oython setup.py install in it08:36
nidhimittalhadanow i did this manually sudo python setup.py egg_info08:37
nidhimittalhadaperhaps it will work08:37
nidhimittalhadasolved the prob08:59
*** nidhimittalhada has quit IRC08:59
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila09:01
*** alyson_ has quit IRC09:02
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:06
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-manila09:09
*** zigo has quit IRC09:25
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-manila09:26
*** tobe has quit IRC09:38
*** alyson_ has joined #openstack-manila09:38
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:40
*** tobe has joined #openstack-manila09:40
*** tobe has quit IRC09:41
*** tobe has joined #openstack-manila09:41
*** tobe has quit IRC09:46
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:47
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila09:47
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-manila09:48
openstackgerritjay.xu proposed openstack/manila: EMC VNX: Add multi-pools support  https://review.openstack.org/25622409:48
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:58
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-manila10:02
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-manila10:06
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC10:07
toabctlmarkstur: https://github.com/openstack/manila-ui/commit/6ea516ecd803ed72de2fa5e6dd3539fcf4c9c22a broke the manila-ui for me when using v2 api10:16
toabctlmarkstur: the api_version is not set now and it uses v1. the positional arg is wrong (should be "2" and not "2.X" because it's the major version10:17
vponomaryovtoabctl: what client version do you use?10:22
toabctlvponomaryov: 1.510:22
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC10:24
vponomaryovtoabctl: you are right, it now uses v110:26
toabctlvponomaryov: I know :)10:26
vponomaryovtoabctl: verified ))10:26
toabctlvponomaryov: I fill a bug against manila-ui10:27
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila10:28
vponomaryovtoabctl: we already bekported it to liberty branch of manila-ui ><10:28
vponomaryovs/bekported/backported/10:28
toabctlvponomaryov: yes. that's why I recognized it10:28
toabctlvponomaryov: hm. maybe we should just use the current bug 152450810:28
openstackbug 1524508 in manila-ui "Manila-ui causes red pop-ups in Horizon. Doesn't work." [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1524508 - Assigned to Mark Sturdevant (mark-sturdevant)10:28
toabctlvponomaryov: the bug doesn't mention which manilaclient version was used there. maybe it's a problem with 1.4?10:29
vponomaryovtoabctl: maybe we should make release of manilaclient and set it as minimal version10:29
toabctlbtw. http://docs.openstack.org/releases/releases/liberty.html still says that 1.4.0 is the liberty release (which is imo wrong)10:30
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:31
toabctlvponomaryov: let's wait for markstur to clarify when the problem he mentioned in the bug happens.10:31
vponomaryovtoabctl: looks like we need to rename arg of common client and provide both10:33
vponomaryovin latest master, then backport it, then it should work10:33
vponomaryovfor both10:33
vponomaryovkwarg should exist anyway for old client10:33
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-manila10:33
vponomaryovor we should restrict its usage10:33
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-manila10:42
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Implement export location metadata feature  https://review.openstack.org/25193010:50
*** vbellur has quit IRC10:58
*** alyson_ has quit IRC11:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC11:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila11:01
openstackgerritsonu proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Removes MANIFEST.in as it is not needed explicitely by PBR  https://review.openstack.org/25895011:02
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila11:03
*** deepakcs has quit IRC11:04
*** a_ta has quit IRC11:08
*** adrianofr has quit IRC11:40
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-manila11:42
*** adrianofr has quit IRC11:54
openstackgerritIgor Malinovskiy proposed openstack/manila: Add update_access() method to driver interface  https://review.openstack.org/24512612:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC12:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila12:01
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila12:03
*** zhongjun2 has joined #openstack-manila12:20
*** zhongjun has quit IRC12:23
*** nidhimittalhada has joined #openstack-manila12:23
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-manila12:26
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila12:33
nidhimittalhada@vponomaryov: a doubt related to mock and assert_called_once_with .. plz see .. http://paste.openstack.org/show/482183/12:35
vponomaryovnidhimittalhada: any mocked object works ok12:37
nidhimittalhadameans?12:37
vponomaryovnidhimittalhada: and your example completely confusing12:37
nidhimittalhadaohk12:38
nidhimittalhadai tried to make it simple.12:38
nidhimittalhadabut i guess no12:38
nidhimittalhadalet me try it in another paste with real code.12:38
vponomaryovnidhimittalhada: real code is simple12:39
nidhimittalhadaok12:39
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC12:43
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila13:05
*** nidhimittalhada has left #openstack-manila13:06
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila13:16
*** gouthamr is now known as gouthamr_away13:16
*** gouthamr_away is now known as gouthamr13:16
openstackgerritDevin proposed openstack/manila: [admin-guide] add manila manually install-guide  https://review.openstack.org/25899613:16
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-manila13:19
*** gouthamr has quit IRC13:22
*** breitz has quit IRC13:32
*** breitz has joined #openstack-manila13:33
*** porrua has joined #openstack-manila13:43
openstackgerritzhongjun proposed openstack/manila-ui: Can not create a LDAP security-service with no auth  https://review.openstack.org/25901213:48
openstackgerritShuquan Huang proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Replace assertEqual(None, *) with assertIsNone in tests  https://review.openstack.org/25901613:50
*** lgreg has joined #openstack-manila13:53
*** lgreg has left #openstack-manila13:54
*** akerr has joined #openstack-manila13:54
*** tpsilva has quit IRC13:56
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-manila13:58
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Refactor share metadata tests to use DB  https://review.openstack.org/25902414:01
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Implement export location metadata feature  https://review.openstack.org/25193014:02
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Implement export location metadata feature  https://review.openstack.org/25193014:05
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-manila14:09
*** dustins|out is now known as dustins14:10
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila14:11
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila14:16
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-manila14:35
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila14:39
*** a_ta has quit IRC14:43
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila14:44
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila14:48
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-manila14:54
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila14:58
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-manila15:01
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila15:08
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila15:24
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:25
*** adrianofr has quit IRC15:30
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila15:36
*** jasonsb has quit IRC15:49
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila15:54
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-manila15:55
*** esker has quit IRC15:56
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila15:56
*** david-lyle_ has quit IRC15:57
*** esker has quit IRC15:57
*** david-lyle has quit IRC15:59
bswartzzhongjun: did I answer your question?16:01
*** markstur_ has quit IRC16:01
vponomaryovzhongjun2: ^16:02
toabctlvponomaryov: any opinion about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257358/ ?16:02
vponomaryov toabctl: does it mean that absence of a key directly leads to error?16:03
*** zhongjun has joined #openstack-manila16:03
vponomaryov toabctl: and password never tried?16:03
toabctlvponomaryov: yes16:04
toabctlvponomaryov: so basically you can not say "don't use a key"16:04
gansocknight: can I ask you a question about the generic grouping proposal?16:04
cknightganso: of course16:04
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-manila16:05
gansocknight: are we enforcing grouping? there will be no more shares without groups, a single share has to be a single group, right?16:05
bswartzganso: no!16:05
cknightganso: No.  There can still be ungrouped shares.16:06
bswartzshares can exist outside groups16:06
gansocknight: wouldn't it make for two branches of code for each API action?16:06
vponomaryovtoabctl: confirm, reproduced on lab16:06
toabctlvponomaryov: thx!16:06
bswartzganso: the theory is that 2 branches is better than N branches (where N is the number of features that need to work together)16:07
cknightganso: Yes.  If we were starting today, we could design an API where each action could handle a share or a share group.16:07
vponomaryovtoabctl: find another +2  )16:07
toabctlvponomaryov: your +2  hopefully enrouage others to follow you! :)16:07
cknightganso: I haven't looked too closely at the API implications, so any simplifying suggestions you have are welcome.16:07
toabctlencourage16:07
vponomaryov)16:07
*** pgbridge has joined #openstack-manila16:08
vponomaryovbswartz, cknight: I am not sure I see problems if we extend existing share types instead of adding group types16:08
gansocknight: it is probably more effort to change everything to work as a group, but for me it seems easier to maintain16:09
gansocknight: my suggestion it to change how manila works, user first has to create an empty group (with extra-specs or not), then create shares in it16:09
cknightganso: That *is* the proposed workflow for grouped shares, but ungrouped shares will still work as always.16:10
cknightganso: If we grouped everything it might be cleaner, but the upgrade path could be challenging, and as a user, sometimes I just want shares and don't want to be bothered with an extra step.16:11
cknightganso: The idea is to create a group when you need the manageability goodness that comes with it.16:12
gansocknight: if he wants to create another completely separate share that has nothing in common with the other share, then create another group and repeat the proccess. That way, all operation such as snapshots, access-allow, access-deny, delete, will not have to check if it is in a group or not to follow 2 different code paths. Maybe I am going to far with this16:12
gansoproposal because I am predicting this will be the case for migration, 2 very different code paths16:12
gansos/proposal/suggestion16:12
cknightganso: Yes, 2 paths, but that was going to be true anyway with the current CG implementation.16:13
cknightganso: And if we added another group mechanism for replication, it gets worse.16:13
toabctlcknight: there could be a "default group" if you are to lazy to create one16:13
cknightganso: And on & on.  Better to handle group migration once.16:13
toabctlbut I havn't followed the discussion and I need to read the wiki first...16:14
cknighttoabctl: Yes, agreed.  I'm envisioning this as consistent as possible with the share types that users & admins already understand.16:14
*** timcl has quit IRC16:16
*** zhongjun has quit IRC16:16
gansocknight: what other group mechanism for replication, sorry I did not understand this, I thought the approach fits replication16:17
*** rebase has joined #openstack-manila16:18
*** rebase has quit IRC16:18
*** merooney has quit IRC16:22
gouthamr_ganso: think he meant we're not proposing a separate replication group concept anymore16:24
gansogouthamr_: I see, as what was before a replicated CG16:25
gansogouthamr_: thanks16:26
gouthamr_ganso: you're welcome..16:26
gansoxyang1: ping16:27
gouthamr_cknight: i'm wondering how polling for replica health would change -> can it still be atomic to each share replica?16:27
xyang1ganso: I am in meeting now16:27
gansoxyang1: ok16:28
xyang1ganso: I can answer you later if you want to write down what you want?16:28
xyang1ganso: back to back meeting all day16:28
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila16:28
cknightgouthamr_: good question.  I think it would still be atomic on each share, but that would also need to roll up to the group.  Just having groups doesn't mean it's members aren't visible or don't have states.16:29
gouthamr_cknight: so the new group model would need to have a replica_state sorta field?16:30
gouthamr_cknight: i know this is still being decided, wanted to chew over the implications :)16:30
gansoxyang1: sure. I am sorry I possibly may have misunderstood what you meant about the share type change bug using manage/unmanage. I implied that the admin was wrong (like trying to cheat the system that does not allow retyping) by using it but your scenario may not be intentional at all. I have been thinking about other possible scenarios and would like to16:32
gansoknow if that is case or not16:32
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Implement export location metadata feature  https://review.openstack.org/25193016:38
*** aorourke has quit IRC16:38
*** aorourke has joined #openstack-manila16:38
*** aorourke has quit IRC16:39
*** aorourke has joined #openstack-manila16:40
*** vbellur has quit IRC16:40
*** marcusvrn_ has joined #openstack-manila16:42
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Zuul is moving in very slow motion since roughly 13:30 UTC; the Infra team is investigating.16:42
*** merooney has quit IRC16:45
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:52
xyang1ganso: I was not trying to describe a bug for manage/unmanage.  I was trying to bring up a general problem that can occur if admin does not do the right things regarding type. sorry for the confusion.16:57
marksturtoabctl, I'm here now.17:01
*** tpsilva has quit IRC17:01
*** a_ta has quit IRC17:03
gansoxyang1: oh, so it was not a bug at all. thanks for clarifying :)17:04
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila17:04
*** eharney has quit IRC17:05
marksturtoabctl, vponomaryov https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256019/ is the abandoned client-side fix17:06
*** a_ta has quit IRC17:08
vponomaryovmarkstur: this change ignores kwarg17:08
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila17:09
bswartzanyone know why the gate is slow today?17:09
marksturvponomaryov, should it ignore version?17:10
marksturvponomaryov, Ignore 1st positional called "api_version"17:10
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila17:10
vponomaryovmarkstur: I think both should be considered17:11
vponomaryovmarkstur: and if kwarg not set then make it equal to arg17:11
marksturvponomaryov, if both set does kwarg overrule positional?17:12
vponomaryovmarkstur: use position for picking up client class and kwarg to provide as argument to that class17:13
vponomaryovs/position/positional/17:13
marksturvponomaryov, Doesn't that allow the 2 versions to be inconsistent?17:15
vponomaryovmarkstur: yes17:15
vponomaryovmarkstur: who in sane mind will send incompatible versions?17:16
vponomaryovmarkstur: in this case it should be expected error17:16
marksturvponomaryov, inconsistency and insanity are both common afflictions around here17:16
vponomaryovmarkstur: you have better proposal?17:17
marksturvponomaryov, No.17:17
marksturvponomaryov, Unfortunately I was only looking at the manila-ui.  Not so sure about the other callers.17:17
vponomaryovmarkstur: if we keep backward compat, what problems could be?17:18
vponomaryovmarkstur: we have no release of client with broken compat17:19
vponomaryovmarkstur: agree?17:19
marksturvponomaryov, yes17:19
openstackgerritMark Sturdevant proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Client fix for api_version in positional and kwarg  https://review.openstack.org/25601917:22
vponomaryovmarkstur: are you going to restore this commit?17:22
vponomaryovoh )))17:22
vponomaryov2 sec latency ))17:22
marksturvponomaryov, Because of typos17:22
marksturvponomaryov, I haven't ran the tests yet.17:23
marksturvponomaryov, is that logic what you were thinking17:23
vponomaryovmarkstur: it will fail17:25
vponomaryovapi_version should instance of class ApiVersion17:25
vponomaryovshould *be*17:25
vponomaryovmarkstur: so, logic tha tis done for "version" should also applied for "api_version"17:26
vponomaryovmarkstur: if it is set17:26
vponomaryov*be* applied17:26
marksturvponomaryov, is it possible any client would have done that?17:27
vponomaryovmarkstur: ?17:27
marksturvponomaryov, nevermind.  fail17:27
vponomaryov))17:27
vponomaryovmarkstur: added comments17:30
*** eharney has quit IRC17:32
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila17:33
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila17:36
openstackgerritMark Sturdevant proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Client fix for api_version in positional and kwarg  https://review.openstack.org/25601917:39
marksturvponomaryov, Still failing some tests, but updated logic17:39
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila17:49
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:49
*** merooney has quit IRC17:58
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila17:59
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila18:03
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila18:05
*** eharney has quit IRC18:11
*** lpetrut has quit IRC18:12
*** esker has quit IRC18:12
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila18:20
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila18:26
marksturbswartz, cknight, toabctl, vponomaryov, u_glide   Anyone have time to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245383/  ?  It passed check. Needs another approver and a "~reverify" if the gate clears up today18:32
markstur^ It is not as a bad as that red bar makes it look.  Mostly test code.18:32
cknightmarkstur: Sure, I18:33
cknighthave already read it.  So I'll look once more.18:33
marksturThanks!18:34
bswartz(notice) NOTICE: Zuul is moving in very slow motion since roughly 13:30 UTC; the Infra team is investigating.18:38
bswartz^ saw that from openstackstatus bot18:38
marksturMy theory is that Zuul is distracted by the new Gerrit UI.18:39
cknightmarkstur: +1  I'm distracted by it as well.  And not in a good mesmerizing sort of way.18:42
*** esker has quit IRC18:47
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila18:47
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC18:55
*** eharney has quit IRC18:56
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila18:56
*** a_ta has quit IRC18:57
*** esker has quit IRC18:57
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila18:57
*** gouthamr has quit IRC18:59
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila19:04
*** esker has quit IRC19:07
*** merooney has quit IRC19:12
*** absubram has joined #openstack-manila19:15
*** merooney has joined #openstack-manila19:31
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila19:53
*** a_ta has quit IRC19:58
openstackgerritDiem Tran proposed openstack/manila: Add feature support information of Oracle ZFSSA Manila driver.  https://review.openstack.org/25916619:59
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila20:32
*** esker has quit IRC20:32
openstackgerritMark Sturdevant proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Client fix for api_version in positional and kwarg  https://review.openstack.org/25601920:32
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila20:33
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila20:39
*** esker has quit IRC21:06
*** akerr has quit IRC21:36
*** cknight has quit IRC21:38
*** ganso has quit IRC21:49
*** a_ta has quit IRC22:01
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila22:02
*** merooney has quit IRC22:02
*** a_ta has quit IRC22:06
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila22:11
*** a_ta has joined #openstack-manila22:11
*** xyang1 has quit IRC22:12
*** dustins is now known as dustins|out22:12
*** a_ta has quit IRC22:16
*** eharney has quit IRC22:18
*** absubram has quit IRC22:36
*** porrua has quit IRC22:42
*** pgbridge has quit IRC23:38
*** darrenc is now known as darrenc_afk23:44
*** erlon has quit IRC23:46
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!