Friday, 2015-04-10

*** ho_ has joined #openstack-manila00:00
*** akerr has quit IRC00:05
*** jasonsb_ has quit IRC00:10
*** bswartz has quit IRC00:30
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-manila00:31
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:18
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila01:20
*** cknight has quit IRC01:32
*** erlon has quit IRC02:31
*** sanjeo_ has joined #openstack-manila02:52
*** xyang1 has quit IRC02:54
*** haigang has joined #openstack-manila02:56
*** haigang has quit IRC02:58
*** haigang has joined #openstack-manila02:59
*** chen12 has joined #openstack-manila03:31
*** haigang has quit IRC03:33
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila04:11
*** vbellur has quit IRC04:46
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila05:37
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila05:44
*** sgotliv has quit IRC05:46
*** sks has joined #openstack-manila05:59
*** lpetrut has quit IRC06:00
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila06:09
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/manila: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/17194106:11
*** haigang has joined #openstack-manila06:24
*** rraja has joined #openstack-manila06:27
*** sanjeo_ has quit IRC07:04
*** nileshb has joined #openstack-manila07:37
*** nileshb has quit IRC07:49
*** vbellur has quit IRC07:56
openstackgerritIgor Malinovskiy proposed openstack/manila: Prevent hanging share server in 'creating' state  https://review.openstack.org/17052808:04
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila08:12
openstackgerritIgor Malinovskiy proposed openstack/python-manilaclient: Implement wrapper for ascii table parser from tempest_lib.cli  https://review.openstack.org/17213708:42
*** Maike has joined #openstack-manila09:03
*** vbellur has quit IRC10:00
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila10:13
*** rcallawa has quit IRC10:26
*** haigang has quit IRC10:29
*** rraja has quit IRC11:02
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-manila11:03
*** vbellur has quit IRC11:48
toabctlvponomaryov: have you deleted the comment from https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1441602 ?11:50
openstackLaunchpad bug 1441602 in Manila "Response 404 NotFound for listing share types request" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Valeriy Ponomaryov (vponomaryov)11:50
vponomaryovtoabctl: yes, it was false11:50
toabctlvponomaryov: ok. so no longer 100% sure that it's in type-access-list ? because I'm also searching and I tried to reproduce it without success11:51
vponomaryovtoabctl: add/remove access have influence11:51
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila12:24
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila12:31
*** bswartz has quit IRC12:33
*** ganso_ has joined #openstack-manila12:41
*** akerr has joined #openstack-manila12:42
*** ho_ has quit IRC12:44
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-manila12:50
openstackgerritValeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/manila: Add object caching in manila REST API requests  https://review.openstack.org/17240713:03
vponomaryovtoabctl: It is not reproducable for me with above change ^13:08
vponomaryovtoabctl: so, absense of caching was the cause13:08
toabctlvponomaryov: hm. I don't understand why caching should solve the problem of mixed requests/responses ...13:19
toabctlvponomaryov: I guess caching could hide it. but do you know now exactly what the problem is? I still don't understand it.13:19
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-manila13:20
bswartzxyang1: any ideas why EMC unit tests have started to fail?13:21
bswartzon patches unrelated to EMC13:21
u_glideroot cause of problem - https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/144236713:22
openstackLaunchpad bug 1442367 in python-neutronclient "2.4.0 release destroys grenade since stable/juno isn't capped properly" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to Akihiro Motoki (amotoki)13:22
u_glideneutron client is broken13:23
bswartzhow can neutronclient break a unit test?13:23
u_glideit's better to ask xyang1 :)13:23
vponomaryovbswartz: because it uses neutronclient13:24
bswartzKyle Mestery (mestery) wrote 16 hours ago: Love the title of the bug, next time I'd go instead with "python-neutronclient release release plague on humanity".13:24
xyang1u_glide: what is it?13:24
bswartzxyang1: 2 emc unit tests have started to consistently fail13:25
bswartzseems to be related to neutron bug13:25
bswartzthis prevents us from merging anything :-(13:25
bswartzmy questions would be why a unit tests doesn't mock out anything related to neutron13:26
bswartz(assuming that's the problem)13:26
u_glideI think neutron imports are broken, thats why we have problems with UT13:28
u_glide*neutron-client13:28
bswartzwhy only those 2 tests though?13:28
bswartzmanila.tests.share.drivers.emc.test_driver.EMCShareFrameworkTestCase.test_update_share_stats13:29
bswartzmanila.tests.share.drivers.emc.test_driver.EMCShareFrameworkTestCase.test_driver_setup13:29
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila13:30
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila13:33
*** Maike has quit IRC13:37
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila13:39
*** Maike has joined #openstack-manila13:39
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila13:43
*** akerr has quit IRC13:46
*** akerr has joined #openstack-manila13:48
*** sks has quit IRC13:48
*** bswartz has quit IRC13:59
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-manila14:02
*** rushil has joined #openstack-manila14:06
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila14:07
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila14:10
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-manila14:14
toabctlvponomaryov: I'll recheck 172407. jus to give it another try if the bug occurs again. ok?14:42
*** esker has quit IRC14:47
*** xyang_ has quit IRC14:58
*** dustins_ has joined #openstack-manila14:59
*** timcl1 has joined #openstack-manila15:01
*** timcl has quit IRC15:02
*** rushil has quit IRC15:02
*** dustins has quit IRC15:03
*** esker has joined #openstack-manila15:08
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila15:11
*** rraja has joined #openstack-manila15:12
*** rcallawa has quit IRC15:20
*** rushil has joined #openstack-manila15:21
*** timcl1 has quit IRC15:21
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-manila15:27
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila15:30
*** timcl has quit IRC15:32
lpabonbswartz, quick question, Does horizon (upstream) support manila in kilo?15:43
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: gerrit has been restarted to address a hung event stream. change events between 15:00 and 15:43 utc which were lost will need to be rechecked or have approval workflow votes reapplied for zuul to act on them15:44
*** vbellur has quit IRC15:49
*** fanyaohong has joined #openstack-manila15:52
marksturlpabon, Upstream Horizon does not work with Manila in Kilo.  Use the forked version.  We're working on a Horizon plugin but that would be too late to count on for Kilo15:52
marksturlpabon, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/docs/HOWTO_use_manila_with_horizon15:53
bswartzmarkstur: +115:55
*** vbellur has joined #openstack-manila16:03
toabctlmarkstur: what means "working"? is there some review in progress? or a blueprint?16:04
toabctlI'm not an horizon expert but I think there is some sort of plugin mechanism. that would allow us to maintain the horizon code in manila. similar to the devstack code16:05
marksturtoabctl, The plugin goes in a separate repo.  There's a review process to make that official.16:07
toabctlmarkstur: can you point me to the repo/review, please?16:07
bswartztoabctl: https://github.com/NetApp/horizon/tree/manila_kilo16:09
marksturtoabctl, bswartz I think he's asking about the future plugin16:10
toabctlbswartz: I know that one.16:10
toabctlmarkstur: yes :)16:10
marksturtoabctl, bswartz I'll go check on when we'll have something to preview.  Obviously when it becomes official it'll all be shared, but I'm not sure how the interim works.  I'll check.16:11
marksturtoabctl, Don't want to confuse people too much during Kilo though.  We need that other Horizon working for Kilo!16:11
toabctlmarkstur: sure. but am I right that you are working internally (Whatever that means) on moving the fork to a plugin structure? I just want to know that because it's something I may would look into if nobody else is doning that.16:13
*** gary-smith has joined #openstack-manila16:14
marksturtoabctl, agreed.  Getting more info soon from gary-smith.16:18
*** sks has joined #openstack-manila16:18
gary-smithI'll post a URL to the repo containing the manila-ui horizon plugin in a minute16:18
*** Maike has quit IRC16:20
*** Maike has joined #openstack-manila16:22
gary-smithHere is the URL: https://github.com/hp-storage/manila-ui16:22
toabctlgary-smith: cool. thanks16:23
gary-smithtoabctl: welcome. Please let me know if it works for you16:23
bswartzgary-smith: is this a fork of something or is it brand new code?16:24
gary-smithbswartz: it is the code from the kilo branch of netapp's horizon repo16:24
gary-smithbut "plugin-ized"16:25
gary-smithOne caveat: it does not include the share-networks support added in commits  581de66 and c3db324, since those required changes into horizon proper16:25
gary-smiththose can be added in after the corresponding changes are made into horizon (basically adding API calls for nova and neutron)16:26
bswartzand the plan is to migrate this to the manila/contrib directory?16:26
gary-smiththe plan is to work through the process of making it a new openstack project16:27
gary-smithakin to tuskar-ui16:27
bswartzoh that's right16:27
gary-smithI'll start on that process on Monday16:27
bswartzI suppose with cross-project dependencies we can manage stuff across reops16:28
bswartzrepos16:28
gary-smithI haven't been able to extensively test this code yet, so any extra eyeballs on it would be good16:29
* bswartz is still distracted by RC stuff16:30
gary-smithunderstandably16:30
eskergary-smith: can you elaborate on the new openstack project you're referring to?16:30
eskergary-smith: where can I learn more?16:30
bswartzesker: its for our horizon integration to live in16:31
gary-smithwell, I haven't started that yet16:31
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila16:31
bswartzhorizon is creating a new plugin model in liberty16:31
marksturbswartz, While we get into the approval process and 'extra eyeballs' we'll need to try to be careful not to veer people away from the supported Horizon (NetApp) Manila UI16:31
eskerAh.. .and each plugin is a separate project?16:31
eskerdidn16:31
bswartzmarkstur: +116:31
eskerdidn't know that...16:31
gary-smithI have to run to meeting right now (sorry). In the interim, please ake a look at the tuskar-ui project16:31
eskerbswartz: is my interpretation correct?  Liberty Horizon moves every plugin into a new project?16:32
*** Maike_ has joined #openstack-manila16:32
marksturI think the relevant conversation is here (fyi): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-03-12-15.00.log.html16:33
eskerbswartz: so there will be a Cinder Horizon project, a Neutron one.. et cetera ... something to that effect?16:33
*** Maike has quit IRC16:33
*** timcl has quit IRC16:33
marksturesker, That is what Horizon wants.  Not sure how fast the move will happen.16:33
eskermarkstur: thx16:33
marksturesker, Easier to say it is the right direction for us.16:33
bswartzesker: I'm not sure that currently integrated projects will move to a new repo, but projects that are not currently integrated will have a way to integrate using plugins16:33
vponomaryovesker: I think main projects will be in one place and all other as plugins16:33
bswartzmaybe they will move eventually, but in the short term there is no other option for projects like manila16:34
eskervponomaryov: got it, thx16:34
bswartzthe fork strategy that we had for Juno and Kilo stinks16:34
marksturThe Horizon discussion about moving to plugins is: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2015/horizon.2015-03-11-20.00.log.html16:35
marksturs/The/A/  I don't know what other talks they've had16:35
eskerbswartz: that wasn't a strategy ;-)16:35
eskerbswartz: it was expedient16:36
bswartzagreed16:36
*** rraja has quit IRC16:36
marksturSeems suggesting the command-line was all that was needed doesn't go very far.16:36
gary-smithI got out of my meeting. FWIW, horizon is moving to the plugin model for all new openstack projects16:37
bswartzgary-smith: when you say "new" that sounds like it implies that "old" projects won't move. do you know what will happen with UIs like cinders?16:38
gary-smithnot really...16:39
gary-smithbut all of the dashboards and panels in horizon right now are actually in plugins, but they still live within the horizon code base16:40
gary-smithnot sure if they will be moving externally or not16:40
marksturbswartz, I think I heard they'd like cinder to move (not sure if that is likely), but also heard moving Neutron wouldn't be practical.16:40
marksturSo I'd say the "strategy" is evolving16:41
bswartzI hope horizon is thinking about avoiding a 1st class / 2nd class plugin hierarchy16:41
marksturI was hoping plug-ins would be 1st class and the old squatters would be 2nd class.16:42
gary-smithI don't think they intend to relegate it to a lower class. I believe that tuskar-ui (and manila-ui in the future) will belong under the horizon project, but just in separate repos16:43
gary-smithlet me rephrase that. I believe that tuskar-ui is currently under horizion, and manila-ui will be also16:44
bswartzgary-smith: :)16:44
*** xyang_ has quit IRC16:50
*** 7YUAABJ1S has joined #openstack-manila16:54
*** 64MACKOGK has joined #openstack-manila16:54
*** 7YUAABJ1S has quit IRC16:57
*** 64MACKOGK has quit IRC16:57
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila16:57
*** dustins_ has quit IRC16:59
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila17:00
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila17:02
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-manila17:10
*** bswartz has quit IRC17:15
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-manila17:18
marksturxyang1, xyang_ ping17:25
*** erlon has joined #openstack-manila17:26
*** esker has quit IRC17:29
*** sgotliv has quit IRC17:29
xyang1markstur: Hi17:31
lpabonthanks markstur17:31
*** sks has quit IRC17:46
*** Maike_ has quit IRC17:57
*** Maike_ has joined #openstack-manila17:58
*** fanyaohong has quit IRC17:59
*** timcl1 has joined #openstack-manila18:01
*** timcl has quit IRC18:03
*** dustins has quit IRC18:16
*** Maike_ has quit IRC18:21
*** Maike has joined #openstack-manila18:21
*** Maike_ has joined #openstack-manila18:29
*** Maike has quit IRC18:29
openstackgerritRyan Hefner proposed stackforge/puppet-manila: Update share driver parameters  https://review.openstack.org/17177818:36
bswartzxyang1, anyone else: has anyone looked into the failing EMC unit tests?18:37
bswartzwe need to fix them/disable them ASAP to unblock our gate18:37
xyang_bswartz: I am looking at it, but it doesn't happen on my set up.  It failed in neutron network plugin18:43
bswartzxyang_: did you nuke your venv and rebuild?18:43
xyang_bswartz: no18:43
bswartz./run_tests.sh -f18:43
xyang_bswartz: I can temporarily disable these two tests if it helps other patches to pass18:44
bswartzxyang_: that is the backup plan -- it would be better to understand why the unit tests aren't mocking out everything related to those methods and fix them so neutronclient can't break the tests18:45
xyang_is vponomaryov still around18:45
bswartzit's pretty late where he is -- and it's a holiday weekend (orthodox easter)18:45
xyang_It looks like it has to do with loading neutron network plugin18:45
xyang_the code in emc driver:   self.driver = emcdriver.EMCShareDriver(18:47
xyang_            configuration=self.configuration)18:47
xyang_self.driver = emcdriver.EMCShareDriver(18:47
xyang_            configuration=self.configuration)18:47
xyang_self.driver = emcdriver.EMCShareDriver(configuration=self.configuration)18:47
xyang_that was the line that caused this18:47
xyang_but then it started to call neutron client18:48
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila18:48
bswartzxyang_: I think you need more mocks before you do that18:48
bswartzthe unit test should isolate the method being tested so that you don't accidentally tests a bunch of other stuff18:48
xyang_there're mocks before that18:49
xyang_let me take a look of tests of other drivers18:50
bswartzwe've spent a bunch of time improving the netapp unit tests -- you can look at them for examples of how to mock18:50
xyang_sure18:50
bswartzI'll take a look at those failing tests and see if I can find the missing mock18:50
xyang_ok, thanks18:52
*** dustins has quit IRC18:54
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila19:09
xyang_bswartz: I wonder if this is the problem: @mock.patch('stevedore.extension.ExtensionManager', mock.Mock(return_value=FakeEMCExtensionManager()))19:12
bswartzxyang_: if you follow the stacktrace of the failing test, the problem seems to exist in the parent driver class19:13
bswartzso I'm trying to figure out why only EMC's driver instantiation tests are affected19:13
xyang_bswartz: we mocked it for emc plugins, but the neutron network plugin may expect this to be non empty19:13
*** dustins has quit IRC19:13
bswartzwhat is stevedore.extension.ExtensionManager?19:14
xyang_bswartz: that is a framework to discover plugins automatically19:14
bswartzdoes your driver use it?19:14
xyang_bswartz: emc parent driver uses it to discover vnx and isilon plugins19:14
xyang_bswartz: I think neutron network plugin uses it as well19:15
bswartzis it essential to mock it out this way in unit tests?19:15
xyang_bswartz: so my theory is this didn't happen before the neutron network plugin was introduced.  now we mocked it to be []19:15
xyang_bswartz: maybe neutron network plugin expect it to be non empty19:16
xyang_bswartz: I'll have see19:16
xyang_have to see19:16
bswartzxyang_: still seems bad that a unit test like this involves instantiating a whole neutron client -- the goal of the test is to prove the EMC driver constructor is correct, not to test the parent classes and what they do19:18
bswartzperhaps an additional mock would prevent the neutron client from ever getting created19:19
xyang_bswartz: this test is specific for the parent class.  we have other tests for vnx and isilon plugins19:19
bswartzI'm referring to manila/manila/share/driver.py19:20
bswartzthe high level parent19:20
bswartzhigher*19:20
bswartzthat's where neutron is getting setup19:20
*** eharney has quit IRC19:22
*** u_glide1 has joined #openstack-manila19:24
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila19:24
*** u_glide1 has quit IRC19:26
*** timcl1 has quit IRC19:36
*** dustins has quit IRC19:36
*** dustins has joined #openstack-manila19:37
xyang_bswartz: I think I have a simple fix, let me do some more testing19:37
*** dustins has quit IRC19:38
*** timcl has joined #openstack-manila19:38
cknightxyang_: You can add "self.mock_object(driver.ShareDriver, '__init__')" in emc/test_driver::setUp right before you create the driver.19:40
cknightxyang_: All your tests pass if you do that.19:41
*** lpabon has quit IRC19:41
xyang_cknight: hi, thanks!  I can try that.  I was going to change driver_handles_share_server=False.  that works too19:43
xyang_cknight: this parent class should not claim driver handles share server = True19:43
xyang_cknight: if it is False, it will not try to load neutron plugin19:44
xyang_cknight: the parent class has two plugins, vnx supports True, while Isilon supports False.  So parent really should not say True19:44
cknightxyang_: Sure.  But this is a unit test, so ideally it shouldn't be necessary to depend on so many outside things that could be mocked instead.19:45
xyang_cknight: so it should still try to load the plugins19:46
xyang_cknight: I know it is faked19:46
cknightxyang_:  Yes, as long as you run EMCShareDriver.__init__, then you will load your plugin.  The problem happens when that constructor calls __init__ in ShareDriver, and a mock can prevent that.19:48
xyang_cknight: so doing your way can prevent it from calling anything in the parent driver19:48
xyang_cknight: I mean maybe prevent future issues19:50
cknightxyang_:  True, but if unit tests depend on functionality from superclasses, they aren't really unit tests.  I'm assuming you have asserts in place that ensure your plugins are loaded as expected.  If so, and your tests all pass, then I expect you're good.19:51
cknightxyang_: Mine definitely isn't the only possible fix, but it seems simple and in the spirit of localized unit testing.19:52
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila19:53
xyang_cknight: I think it really depends on what you want to test.  I think I can go either way on this one.  do you know if there's a bug open for this already19:56
bswartzxyang_: I'll file a bug19:57
bswartzhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/144278819:58
openstackLaunchpad bug 1442788 in Manila "Two EMC unit tests failing due to changes in neutronclient" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Xing Yang (xing-yang)19:58
xyang_bswartz: thanks20:01
*** timcl has quit IRC20:14
openstackgerritxing-yang proposed openstack/manila: Mock out base share driver __init__ in EMC driver  https://review.openstack.org/17255720:15
*** xyang_ has quit IRC20:15
*** akerr has quit IRC20:18
xyang1cknight: bswartz, submitted:)20:18
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-manila20:23
bswartzxyang1: ty20:31
bswartzxyang1, xyang_: you know you switch back and forth between 2 IRC handles20:31
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila20:32
*** lpetrut has quit IRC20:33
xyang_bswartz: yes, for some reason, I still can't see your message on the one as xyang120:34
bswartz:-(20:34
xyang_bswartz: xyang1 is on an IRC client on my ipad.  this one is on my laptop.  it is easier to type on laptop20:35
*** rcallawa_ has joined #openstack-manila20:36
*** rcallawa has quit IRC20:38
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC20:38
bswartzxyang_: might be a setting in your ipad IRC client20:40
bswartzdid you accidentally blacklist me? Am I the only one you can see on that client?20:40
xyang_bswartz: :)20:42
xyang_bswartz: seems to be so far, I haven't discovered others yet.  I kept seeing other reply to you without your response20:42
xyang_bswartz: I thought you were sending private messages:)20:43
*** rcallawa_ has quit IRC20:43
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila20:44
bswartzxyang_: might want to change the topic on your change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172557/20:47
bswartzthen again it makes more sense when you read the commit message20:47
bswartztopics aren't part of the permanent record though so I guess it does't matter20:47
xyang_bswartz: sure20:48
*** rcallawa has quit IRC20:48
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila20:48
*** cknight has quit IRC20:52
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila20:53
xyang_bswartz: so changed to "Fixed unit test failures in EMC driver"?20:53
bswartzno I was talking about the gerrit topic20:54
bswartzwhich named after your git branch20:54
xyang_bswartz: so change it to use the bug number?20:54
bswartzno there's no need to change20:55
xyang_ok, thanks20:55
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-manila20:57
*** rcallawa has quit IRC21:03
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila21:07
*** bswartz has quit IRC21:08
*** rcallawa has quit IRC21:17
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila21:18
*** jasonsb has quit IRC21:25
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila21:26
*** rcallawa has quit IRC21:31
*** jasonsb has quit IRC21:31
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila21:31
*** lpetrut has left #openstack-manila21:38
*** rushil has quit IRC21:41
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-manila22:10
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila22:14
*** rcallawa has quit IRC22:30
*** rcallawa has joined #openstack-manila22:31
marksturcknight, bswartz if you're online the EMC unit test gate fix could use a +A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172557/22:40
cknightmarkstur: We're online, and we've mutually decided to give the non-NetApp cores a chance to do the +A.  Xing wrote the fix, so the Mirantis guys are needed for the +A, most likely early tomorrow.  If for whatever reason they don't, we'll do it ourselves.22:42
bswartzmarkstur: we're trying to follow the new rule we established22:45
bswartzin an emergency I'd +A it, but we can wait until the ukranians guys wake up tomorrow22:46
marksturbswartz, I thought you just weren't supposed to +A w/ only NetApp stuff.  I see it now it is only NetApp +2's22:47
marksturbswartz, I pretty much assumed Xing would approve, but that does make things tricky now doesn't it?22:48
bswartzit's a minor thing22:48
bswartzif we grow the core team a few more people this problem should go away22:48
bswartzRC can't happen until all 6 bugs merge22:48
marksturYes, but it is holding up the gate and did we make RC1?22:48
bswartzmerging that fix won't shorten the time until RC122:48
bswartzwe need all 622:48
marksturOK.  It's holding up the 2 gluster fixes.  I didn't check the whole list.22:49
*** erlon has quit IRC22:51
marksturIt looks like all 6 have +222:52
bswartzyeah we're pretty close22:55
bswartzjust need a few last core reviews and workflows22:55
bswartzthen after that we can merge 17210422:56
bswartzxyang_ if you're still on, we'd appreciate +2As on the other 3 bugs that need it22:57
marksturbswartz, Didn't you say xyang_ xyang1 filtered you :)23:00
bswartzI think xyang1 filters me but xyang_ doesn't23:00
bswartzshe's east coast though so not much hope she's still working23:00
marksturYeah.  That's why I thought you our Clinton would +A that one if one of you were online.  Didn't think thru the new rules correctly tho.23:01
bswartzwe may end up regretting the rule and reversing it23:02
bswartzI'm regretting it today, but I really think this is an unusual situation23:03
*** Maike_ has quit IRC23:12
*** cknight has quit IRC23:15
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila23:16
*** ganso_ has quit IRC23:17
*** cknight has quit IRC23:19
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila23:24
*** cknight has quit IRC23:25
*** cknight has joined #openstack-manila23:35
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-manila23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!