Monday, 2014-05-19

*** lifeless has joined #openstack-infra00:07
*** otter768 has quit IRC00:08
*** medieval1 has quit IRC00:09
*** medieval1 has joined #openstack-infra00:10
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-infra00:34
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-infra00:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-infra01:00
*** saschpe has quit IRC01:05
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-infra01:06
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC01:07
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-infra01:12
*** chyang has joined #openstack-infra01:35
*** gilliard_ has joined #openstack-infra01:38
*** jhesketh has quit IRC01:41
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-infra01:41
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC01:42
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra01:46
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-infra01:52
*** gilliard_ has quit IRC02:03
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra02:06
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek02:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:09
*** changbl has quit IRC02:11
*** esker has quit IRC02:13
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra02:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra02:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:16
*** lifeless has quit IRC02:16
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-infra02:17
*** esker has quit IRC02:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra02:21
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-infra02:24
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:30
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra02:31
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:34
*** timfreun1 is now known as timfreund02:54
*** changbl has joined #openstack-infra03:00
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra03:06
*** gilliard_ has joined #openstack-infra03:09
*** gilliard_ has quit IRC03:14
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz03:14
*** malini_afk is now known as malini03:19
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:21
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-infra03:30
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek03:32
*** malini is now known as malini_afk03:32
*** chyang has quit IRC03:38
*** esker has quit IRC03:41
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra03:42
*** esker has quit IRC03:46
*** otter768 has quit IRC03:47
*** Hg has joined #openstack-infra03:48
*** Hg is now known as Guest5172003:49
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:51
*** Guest51720 has quit IRC03:54
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-infra03:54
*** lnxnut has quit IRC03:57
openstackgerritDevananda van der Veen proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Create ironic-specs git repo  https://review.openstack.org/9411304:08
*** HenryG has quit IRC04:11
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-infra04:12
*** HenryG has quit IRC04:16
*** yfried has quit IRC04:20
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-infra04:22
*** chyang has joined #openstack-infra04:26
*** changbl has quit IRC04:28
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra04:32
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-infra04:32
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:37
*** isviridov has joined #openstack-infra04:42
*** _afazekas has quit IRC04:45
*** afazekas is now known as _afazekas04:46
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz04:46
*** paul--_ has joined #openstack-infra04:47
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek04:50
*** d3nyal has joined #openstack-infra04:50
HenryGJenkins is going beserk on this:  https://review.openstack.org/9247704:51
StevenKHenryG: Comment on a old patchset, known issue04:54
StevenKBut I have no idea how to stop it04:55
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra05:11
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov_away05:12
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-infra05:14
*** d3nyal has quit IRC05:20
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz05:20
*** yfried has joined #openstack-infra05:21
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-infra05:26
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek05:30
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra05:32
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra05:34
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:38
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-infra05:49
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz05:51
*** dims has quit IRC05:54
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8706:10
*** yfried has quit IRC06:12
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:17
*** adam_gone is now known as adam_g06:19
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC06:21
*** yfried has joined #openstack-infra06:21
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC06:25
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-infra06:27
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-infra06:28
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-infra06:33
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra06:35
*** paul--_ has quit IRC06:38
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-infra06:38
cgoncalveshi. someone from the infra team could please check what's happening to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92477/ please? gerrit is mad :-/06:40
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-infra06:44
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra06:44
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-infra06:46
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC06:49
*** vtapia has joined #openstack-infra06:50
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra06:50
praneshp_cgoncalves: wow06:51
praneshp_cgoncalves: there was discussion about it before you joined the room06:52
praneshp_cgoncalves: HenryG: Jenkins is going beserk on this:  https://review.openstack.org/9247706:52
praneshp_[9:54pm] StevenK: HenryG: Comment on a old patchset, known issue06:52
praneshp_[9:55pm] StevenK: But I have no idea how to stop it06:52
praneshp_[10:11pm]06:52
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek06:53
cgoncalvespraneshp_: thanks. I also just sent an email to -dev ML letting people know of it06:56
*** gilliard_ has joined #openstack-infra06:57
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:00
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz07:03
openstackgerritChmouel Boudjnah proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add swift specs repository  https://review.openstack.org/9414007:05
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:10
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra07:11
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC07:14
*** katyafervent_awa is now known as katyafervent07:19
*** Ivo has quit IRC07:23
*** andreaf has quit IRC07:26
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-infra07:27
*** pblaho has joined #openstack-infra07:27
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra07:29
*** praneshp_ has quit IRC07:33
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:33
*** shardy has joined #openstack-infra07:34
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:40
*** jooools has joined #openstack-infra07:42
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra07:43
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra07:45
*** alff has joined #openstack-infra07:50
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra07:50
*** Hal_ has quit IRC07:53
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra07:54
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC07:54
*** gilliard_ has quit IRC07:55
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra07:55
*** chyang has quit IRC08:00
*** medieval1_ has joined #openstack-infra08:00
*** medieval1 has quit IRC08:02
*** jpich has joined #openstack-infra08:04
*** odyssey4me has joined #openstack-infra08:04
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-infra08:06
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-infra08:15
*** darraghb has quit IRC08:16
*** mrodden has quit IRC08:17
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-infra08:17
*** locke105 has quit IRC08:18
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-infra08:18
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-infra08:18
*** locke105 has joined #openstack-infra08:18
*** darraghb has left #openstack-infra08:23
*** pelix has joined #openstack-infra08:23
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-infra08:25
*** hashar has joined #openstack-infra08:25
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri08:26
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-infra08:37
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-infra08:37
*** Longgeek has quit IRC08:40
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC08:47
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra08:47
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC08:51
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri08:52
*** Hal_ has quit IRC08:55
ttxcgoncalves: maybe try to upload a new patchset with some gratuitous change, might break the infinite loop08:59
*** _dguerri is now known as dguerri09:01
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-infra09:02
*** rlandy has joined #openstack-infra09:05
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-infra09:06
*** LinuxJedi has joined #openstack-infra09:06
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra09:10
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-infra09:10
ttxmordred: you mentioned that the bug about AUTHORS generation was fixed (https://bugs.launchpad.net/pbr/+bug/1309585) but https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88627/ was just abandoned ?09:10
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1309585 in pbr "AUTHORS file generation is borken" [High,In progress]09:10
*** jp_at_hp has joined #openstack-infra09:11
*** LinuxJedi has quit IRC09:11
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:13
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-infra09:15
*** LinuxJedi has joined #openstack-infra09:19
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra09:23
*** che-arne has quit IRC09:36
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-infra09:42
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-infra09:43
cgoncalvesttx: done, it stopped. any chance of cleaning that mess in Gerrit?09:43
ttxcgoncalves: maybe infra team can do it09:44
ttxthey need to investigate the loop first :)09:44
derekh_Has nodepool stopped talking to the tripleo-test-cloud provider for some reason ?09:45
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra09:45
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC09:47
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra09:49
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC09:50
*** Hal_ has quit IRC09:52
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra09:52
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:55
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra09:56
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC09:57
*** paul--_ has joined #openstack-infra10:03
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra10:05
*** yfried_ has joined #openstack-infra10:07
openstackgerritRicardo Carrillo Cruz proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Parameterize SSL certificate attributes on review.pp manifest  https://review.openstack.org/9368710:07
*** yfried has quit IRC10:07
*** Ivo has joined #openstack-infra10:08
*** vogxn has joined #openstack-infra10:13
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-infra10:13
openstackgerritRicardo Carrillo Cruz proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Parameterize SSL certificate attributes on review.pp manifest  https://review.openstack.org/9368710:15
openstackgerritRicardo Carrillo Cruz proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Parameterize SSL certificate attributes on review.pp manifest  https://review.openstack.org/9368710:20
*** Hal_ has quit IRC10:22
*** vogxn has quit IRC10:24
*** Ivo has quit IRC10:25
*** vogxn has joined #openstack-infra10:29
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:31
*** mfer has joined #openstack-infra10:38
*** vogxn has quit IRC10:47
*** mwagner_ has quit IRC10:48
*** yfried_ has quit IRC10:53
sdaguewelcome back folks10:55
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:57
hasharsdague: hello! Someone pushed bash8 to pypi \O/10:58
hasharjust sharing my hapiness10:58
sdagueit was mrodden doing the real work on that, many thanks to him10:59
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra11:01
openstackgerritAntoine Musso proposed a change to openstack-infra/zuul: Pass change and pipeline to the status_url  https://review.openstack.org/8690011:03
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC11:04
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk11:04
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8711:05
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra11:06
*** paul--_ has quit IRC11:08
*** fbo_away_away is now known as fbo_away_away_aw11:08
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra11:08
*** vogxn has joined #openstack-infra11:09
*** yfried_ has joined #openstack-infra11:10
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:10
*** dguerri is now known as _dguerri11:12
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-infra11:13
*** mburned_out is now known as mburned11:16
openstackgerritAntoine Musso proposed a change to openstack-infra/zuul: Pass change and pipeline to the status_url  https://review.openstack.org/8690011:16
*** wayneeseguin has quit IRC11:16
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra11:18
pelixAny more feedback available on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48783?11:19
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:21
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:22
*** lnxnut has quit IRC11:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:27
*** ominakov has quit IRC11:28
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra11:29
*** wayneeseguin has joined #openstack-infra11:29
*** ihrachyshka_ has joined #openstack-infra11:30
*** mfer has quit IRC11:30
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-infra11:31
*** ominakov has quit IRC11:31
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC11:32
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-infra11:33
openstackgerritVictor Sergeyev proposed a change to openstack-infra/devstack-gate: Add oslo.db to the devstack gate  https://review.openstack.org/9417311:36
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:36
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-infra11:42
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC11:42
*** mbacchi has joined #openstack-infra11:48
*** ominakov has quit IRC11:52
*** paul--_ has joined #openstack-infra11:52
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-infra11:53
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra11:53
*** fbo_away_away_aw has quit IRC11:55
*** fbo_away has joined #openstack-infra11:56
*** bcrochet has quit IRC11:57
*** bcrochet has joined #openstack-infra12:00
*** Ivo has joined #openstack-infra12:02
*** vogxn has quit IRC12:02
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra12:03
*** paul--_ has quit IRC12:04
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-infra12:07
*** bcrochet has quit IRC12:07
*** bcrochet has joined #openstack-infra12:10
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-infra12:15
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-infra12:20
*** miqui_ has joined #openstack-infra12:21
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-infra12:22
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek12:22
*** niska has quit IRC12:29
*** weshay has joined #openstack-infra12:29
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_12:31
*** niska has joined #openstack-infra12:34
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-infra12:34
*** jpeeler has quit IRC12:35
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-infra12:35
*** isviridov_away is now known as isviridov12:36
andreafjeblair: ping12:38
*** thomasem has quit IRC12:38
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz12:38
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-infra12:39
*** thomasem has quit IRC12:43
sdagueandreaf: I expect he's back on westcoast time now12:45
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-infra12:45
andreafsdague: ah right, will try later, thanks12:45
anteayamorning morning12:52
anteayaI slept in my own house for that last 2 nights, I am soooooo happy12:52
*** Ivo has quit IRC12:59
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo_away_away13:01
*** mfer has joined #openstack-infra13:01
*** mfer has quit IRC13:02
*** malini_afk is now known as malini13:02
*** mfer has joined #openstack-infra13:02
*** mfer has quit IRC13:03
*** mfer has joined #openstack-infra13:03
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-infra13:03
sdagueanteaya: awesome13:04
*** BobBall has joined #openstack-infra13:04
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC13:05
*** mfer_ has joined #openstack-infra13:05
*** mfer has quit IRC13:06
*** gilliard_ has joined #openstack-infra13:06
*** dprince has joined #openstack-infra13:06
*** smarcet has joined #openstack-infra13:07
openstackgerritMalini Kamalambal proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Make Tempest job voting for Marconi  https://review.openstack.org/9356813:07
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC13:09
anteayasdague: thanks13:10
anteayaI'm drumming up business for this meeting which is happening today in about 5 hours: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty13:11
anteayaif you can think of anyone who should know about this meeting, do pass the link along13:12
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek13:12
openstackgerritChmouel Boudjnah proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add swift specs repository  https://review.openstack.org/9414013:12
*** Ivoz has joined #openstack-infra13:12
chmouelnotmyname: ^13:12
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-infra13:13
*** sahumada has quit IRC13:14
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra13:15
*** vogxn has joined #openstack-infra13:16
*** paul--_ has joined #openstack-infra13:16
*** changbl has joined #openstack-infra13:20
*** thomasem has left #openstack-infra13:20
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra13:21
*** esker has quit IRC13:22
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-infra13:22
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra13:23
*** dkliban_afk is now known as dkliban13:25
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi13:27
*** mfer_ is now known as mfer13:28
*** sahumada has joined #openstack-infra13:28
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC13:29
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra13:35
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra13:35
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC13:36
ttxsdague: o/13:36
sdaguettx: what's up?13:37
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-infra13:37
*** homeless has joined #openstack-infra13:37
ttxjust waving hello in response to your "welcome back"13:38
* ttx is not 100% operational yet13:38
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra13:40
sdague:)13:40
sdagueyeh, I just processed my gpg keys13:40
anteayahey ttx13:40
anteayasdague: thank you for that13:40
anteayaso why does https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93958/1 have so many dependencies13:40
ttxsdague: I upgraded to 14.04 LTS. Only requires one half of my brain13:40
*** oomichi has quit IRC13:40
sdagueheh13:41
anteayadependencies like new repos, that I don't understand13:41
anteayaI understand new repos, I don't understand the relationship to 93958 though13:41
sdagueanteaya: I think it's an artifact of that being the top of master13:41
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-infra13:41
anteayainteresting13:41
anteayathat could create some fun down the road13:42
sdagueit's the way things always worked before, the visualization might be different13:42
sdague93958 is merged13:42
sdagueso it's "needed by" all the changes that are proposed13:43
sdaguebecause that's the parent git ref13:43
anteayaoh okay, so if the only thing that is different is that we can see it now, that if fine13:44
anteayaI will get prepared to respond to similar questions from others about this13:44
anteayattx doing anything at 1800 utc today? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty13:44
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC13:45
anteayattx I'd love to have you lurking to ensure we start off headed in the right direction13:45
anteayaif you can13:45
ttxanteaya: hmm, not really at that time. I can read logs afterwards though13:45
ttxif you send me an email so that i remember it13:45
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra13:46
anteayaokay13:46
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi13:46
anteayachmouel: confirming you want a separate gerrit group for swift-specs13:50
anteayathe swift-specs-core group13:50
pelixIs there anything wrong with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48783 ?13:50
anteayapelix: well so far jenkins and zaro are happy with the patch13:51
anteayaso of the reviews thus far noone has found anything wrong with it13:52
pelixbut not enough right with it? :p13:53
anteayanot enough reviews on it yet13:53
anteayanot enough people have had a chance to look at it13:54
notmynameanteaya: chmouel: no. I want swift-specs to have the same review group as swift itself13:54
chmouelah yeah that's an error,13:54
anteayayou are welcome to help out and reduce the congnitive load on the reviewers by becoming a reviewer anytime, pelix13:54
anteayaif you want some suggestions for getting started, let me know, I will help you13:55
pelixanteaya: given it's been unchanged since Apr 21, I'm wondering if people wanted to ask me questions about it before they gave any other feedback13:55
*** jasond` has joined #openstack-infra13:55
anteayachmouel notmyname k, thanks, I'll wait for the next patchset13:55
anteayapelix: great, thanks for offering13:55
pelixanteaya: have been reviewing off/on on JJB for the last 9 months or so :)13:55
anteayapelix: wonderful, thank you for your reviews13:55
*** jasond` has left #openstack-infra13:56
anteayachmouel: and nice catch on the ironic specs patch13:57
*** annegent^ has joined #openstack-infra13:57
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi13:58
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra13:58
*** ihrachyshka_ has quit IRC13:59
chmouelanteaya: the ironic patch may want to have the ironic-core to vote for the ironic-specs as well (since i was copying and paste from that patch)14:00
chmouelinstead of the ironic-specs-group14:00
openstackgerritChmouel Boudjnah proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add swift specs repository  https://review.openstack.org/9414014:01
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra14:01
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-infra14:01
anteayachmouel: thanks I will ask them about that14:02
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra14:04
anteayachmouel: can I request a review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93929/ please?14:05
openstackgerritSean Dague proposed a change to openstack-infra/jeepyb: use exceptions instead of return True/False  https://review.openstack.org/9419614:05
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-infra14:06
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC14:07
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC14:09
*** paul--_ has quit IRC14:09
sdagueany idea if fungi is back today?14:10
sdagueI'd like to get some early feedback on that last change14:10
jeblairsdague: mostly out today, back tomorrow14:10
sdaguejeblair: but you're awake :)14:11
anteayahey jeblair14:11
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra14:11
jeblairanteaya: mornin'!14:12
sdaguejeblair: hope it was an uneventful trip home14:12
jeblairsdague: yes, except for writing like 8 gertty patches -- including kill-thread ;)14:13
jeblair(i haven't merged it yet)14:13
jeblair(but they're on gerrit)14:14
sdaguenice14:14
rcarrillocruzi'm cleaning up review.pp manifest that contain site specific info. What I did was to add the review class additional arguments and a hiera lookup at the node level. However, I assume I don't have access to hiera data sources (common.yaml for example) as it's sensitive data. Not sure how to proceed, should I open another bug requesting those changes to add it to hiera?14:14
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-infra14:14
sdaguejeblair: I decided no code on the way home. Needed to let my brain do something else.14:14
*** signed8bit has joined #openstack-infra14:14
rcarrillocruzthe change is this btw: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93687/714:16
anteayasdague: good call14:16
jeblairsdague: that's my usual course of action.  i have found hacking on gertty strangely relaxing though.14:16
jeblairrcarrillocruz: probably the best thing is to note the required steps in the commit message14:16
rcarrillocruzsomething like "Infra team would need to add values for params foo,bar etc on common.yaml" ?14:17
krtaylormorning14:18
anteayamorning krtaylor14:18
anteayaI'm drumming up business for our meeting later today14:18
krtaylorhey anteaya - are we doing the 3rd party meeting today?14:18
krtaylorhehheh14:18
anteayakrtaylor: yes14:18
anteaya:D14:18
sdaguejeblair: it would be nice to know if you hate this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94196/ before I start trying to put dashboard support on top of it14:18
anteayabad call on my part, today is supposed to be a holiday14:18
anteayanot the first time I have shot myself in the foot like this14:19
anteayameh, I'll live with it14:19
openstackgerritDevananda van der Veen proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Create ironic-specs git repo  https://review.openstack.org/9411314:19
jeblairsdague: just left comments on it14:19
sdaguecool14:19
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg14:19
krtayloranteaya, hehheh, well, we could start next week14:19
* krtaylor is still trying to unpack brain14:19
jeblairokay, my priorities are now: a. breakfast, b. fix zuul comment-loop-on-old-patches, c. other things i expected to do today.  :)14:20
*** olaph has joined #openstack-infra14:21
rcarrillocruzhmm, found 'some' info on how to go forward also on http://ci.openstack.org/sysadmin.html#adding-a-new-server14:21
clarkbjeblair you can abandon my patchset for zuul comments if you like but I think the test may be useful14:21
rcarrillocruzso I guess I'll ping some of you once the patch lands14:21
jeblairclarkb: haven't seen it -- link?14:21
rcarrillocruzit's something i wanted to raise tomorrow in the infra meeting, i think our manifests should be more generic and have as much specific as possible at the node level14:22
jeblairclarkb: oh, found it.14:22
rcarrillocruzthis helps use the manifests to lay out 'infra' servers in VM when we work on bugs14:22
clarkbhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/92942/14:22
anteayajeblair: sounds like a good list14:23
clarkbthough the test needs a different layout file due to that bug in requires I mentioned14:24
openstackgerritGraham Hayes proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add stackforge/designate-specs  https://review.openstack.org/8754014:24
openstackgerritSean Dague proposed a change to openstack-infra/jeepyb: use exceptions instead of return True/False  https://review.openstack.org/9419614:24
krtayloranteaya, seems like a good agenda/wrap up from summit14:25
jeblairclarkb: so i'm trying to figure out if your change is sufficient or if it should be a pipeline requirement14:25
anteayakrtaylor: thanks14:25
krtayloranteaya, next week we should get cinder on the agenda14:25
anteayakrtaylor: if we are still all in chill mode, that might be a good beginning for the discussion14:25
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz14:26
clarkbjeblair: I think we decided it should be a pipeline thing14:26
anteayakrtaylor: do add to the agenda14:26
jeblairclarkb: i think since that flag defaults to true, it's safe for non-gerrit-triggered changes and post jobs -- but it would prevent, say, the experimental pipeline from being run on old patchsets14:26
clarkbwhich is why abandoning my change is ok. but the test is mostly useable if you dont want to rewrite that14:26
krtayloranteaya, will do, after the cinder session, I think we have to get that ball rolling14:26
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC14:26
*** gilliard_ has quit IRC14:26
anteayakrtaylor: yes, the cinder folks need to have some time and attention14:26
anteayaalso sahara has indicated interest and I do expect ironic to show up before too long14:27
jeblairclarkb: my memory was fuzzy about this since it happened while i was semi-out.  do you want to continue working on it?14:27
krtayloranteaya, I went to the triple-o session and it seemed healthy, at least for the moment14:28
anteayakrtaylor: awesome, thank you14:28
clarkbjeblair: I can if it helps you but I was hoping for today to be a bit lazy (need to do OS upgrades locally)14:28
anteayaand I am so glad to hear that14:28
anteayakrtaylor: can you ensure they are aware of the existance of the meeting and feel welcome to attend?14:29
jeblairclarkb: okay, i can work on it.  it's just that there was another really long loop this morning, so i think it's kinda urgent.14:29
clarkbso feel free to jump on it if you prefer14:29
clarkb++14:29
clarkbI can definitely provide reviews with a reasonable understanding of the thing14:29
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-infra14:29
*** ihrachyshka_ has joined #openstack-infra14:29
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra14:30
krtayloranteaya, yes, I'll make the rounds and spread the news14:30
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Create identity-specs git repo  https://review.openstack.org/9411914:30
dizquierdohello there, mm just wondering if at some point during the last weeks the review.openstack.org IP address was changed14:31
dizquierdoI received an internal warning when mining gerrit14:32
dizquierdoand well... just to be sure :)14:32
devanandaanteaya: ah, discussing the 3rd party meeting? yes, some ironic folks should show up14:32
*** msabramo has quit IRC14:32
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC14:32
devanandaanteaya: at this point, should I point core devs or third-party contribs your way // to the meeting?14:33
derekh_Has nodepool stopped talking to the tripleo-test-cloud provider for some reason ?14:33
clarkbdizquierdo: yes it was changed. there are mail list announcements with all the details if you want them14:33
clarkbthe ip address and ssh host keys were changed when we upgraded to gerrit 2.814:34
dizquierdooh that's ok clarkb, didn't see the email sorry about that14:34
dizquierdothanks a lot! :)14:34
dizquierdosorry for the noise14:34
krtaylordevananda, meeting info, we will be framing here-> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty14:35
anteayadevananda: both thanks14:39
anteayaI need third party folks to know14:39
anteayamostly today I would really like to hear from core devs to shape the format14:39
devanandaanteaya: ack. though several ironic-core won't make it today (we are skipping our meeting because brainoverload)14:40
Shrewsclarkb: do you know if tox 1.7.1 is ok to use?14:40
Shrewshttps://bitbucket.org/hpk42/tox/issue/150/posargs-configerror  seems to indicate it is, just wondering if we've tested it14:41
anteayadevananda: understood14:41
*** zns has quit IRC14:42
*** wenlock has joined #openstack-infra14:42
mordredShrews, clarkb: wow. the discussion on that bug is amazing14:42
anteayaby way of an fyi, most other specs repos are using the name of their signature project as the name of their specs repo, keystone is wants to call theirs identiy specs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94119/14:42
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-infra14:42
anteayapersonally I have no problem with the name of their specs repo14:43
anteayaI don't think the name was part of the discussion around specs repos and consistentcy14:43
clarkbshrews: I think you need the next release which hasnt happened yet14:43
anteayaso I +1'd the patch as it stands14:43
clarkbyou can install tox from source to test (which I havent done but should do)14:43
Shrewsclarkb: ah, yeah.  > 1.7.1 needed14:44
morganfainberganteaya, any idea why there was a python27 job for some of the spec repos? dolphm pointed it out and i'm now wondering as well.  I was using a previous spec repo as a template14:44
lxslijeblair andreaf: any idea what fixed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1285288 please?14:45
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1285288 in nova "gate-nova-docs  No module named ...." [Undecided,Incomplete]14:45
anteayamorganfainberg: no idea14:45
*** lnxnut is now known as hipster14:45
anteayasince the patches will be text I have no idea why people are running unit tests against the patches14:45
morganfainberganteaya, ok let me go ask around, if it's not needed, I'm going to pull it out (less things to do is good)14:45
anteayamorganfainberg: agreed14:45
clarkbmorganfainberg it does simple checks iirc of format maybe14:45
yfried_clarkb: I am working on a patch for debugging multi-node setup. it's default mode should be to connect to localhost via ssh. for this I will need default user/pass for the machine running tempest, is there some way to get it?14:46
anteayamostly I have been focused on the acl files14:46
*** james_li has joined #openstack-infra14:46
clarkbyfried_: no you should use ssh keys only14:46
lxslimorganfainberg: there's a unit test that checks the section titles (in tripleo-specs at least)14:46
morganfainberglxsli, aha. that is a good answer.14:46
yfried_clarkb: ok - so default user/key?14:46
*** packet has joined #openstack-infra14:47
morganfainberglxsli, thanks!!14:47
lxslimorganfainberg: I helped!!! \o/14:47
morganfainbergdolphm, ^ lxsli's comment14:47
clarkbon our test slaves the password is created but not the same across nodes and not stored anywhere accessible14:47
clarkbso no default14:47
morganfainberglxsli, and I think i'm going to steal your test :)14:48
lxslimorganfainberg: before you do, check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91801/14:48
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC14:48
*** yfried_ is now known as yfried|14:48
morganfainberglxsli, ++14:48
morganfainberglxsli, awesome! thanks again!!14:49
lxsliglad I could help :)14:49
yfried|clarkb: ok, so a way to get the current pass/key for a localhost?14:49
*** yfried| is now known as yfried|gone14:49
clarkbyfried| no even when they are stored they are hashed. ssh keys is the way to do this14:50
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-infra14:51
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra14:52
dolphmmorganfainberg: lxsli: ah, thanks!14:52
*** esker has quit IRC14:54
*** yfried|gone has quit IRC14:54
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek14:54
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra14:54
openstackgerritGraham Hayes proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add stackforge/designate-specs  https://review.openstack.org/8754014:56
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-infra14:56
mugsieanteaya: i think ^ fixes what you were looking for14:57
* anteaya clicks14:57
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra14:57
*** adalbas has quit IRC14:57
*** ominakov has quit IRC14:58
anteayamugsie: it does, +114:58
anteayaand thank you14:58
mugsieanteaya: np - thanks for the help14:59
*** fbo_away_away is now known as fbo14:59
anteaya:D14:59
*** esker has quit IRC14:59
krotscheckStoryboard meeting in #openstack-meeting-315:01
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-infra15:02
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC15:02
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC15:03
*** moted has joined #openstack-infra15:04
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra15:05
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra15:06
*** blamar has joined #openstack-infra15:07
*** hipster has quit IRC15:08
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-infra15:09
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-infra15:09
*** adalbas has quit IRC15:12
james_liclarkb: if you have time today please review  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92655/2  ?15:13
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-infra15:14
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC15:17
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra15:23
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra15:23
SergeyLukjanovanteaya, /me acking sahara interest for 3rd party testing discussions15:23
clarkbhttps://github.com/openstack/openstack/graphs/commit-activity more things get merged during holiday weeks than summit weeks :)15:24
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-infra15:25
*** vogxn has quit IRC15:25
anteayaSergeyLukjanov: awesome, thank you15:26
anteayaSergeyLukjanov: can you make today's meeting?15:26
anteayakrtaylor: can you look at this? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-meeting-format15:27
anteayajaypipes if you are about ^^15:28
anteayaclarkb: ha ha ha15:28
anteayathat is really funny15:28
*** maxbit has quit IRC15:28
anteaya10 merges on Monday15:28
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra15:29
*** UtahDave has joined #openstack-infra15:30
*** mkerrin has joined #openstack-infra15:30
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-infra/elastic-recheck: Add query for 1320617  https://review.openstack.org/9408015:30
*** lcostantino has quit IRC15:31
*** ptippett has joined #openstack-infra15:32
*** esker has quit IRC15:33
devanandaanteaya: fwiw, summary of ironic's 3rd party aims: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ironic/Testing#Third_party_CI15:34
*** esker has joined #openstack-infra15:34
*** msabramo has joined #openstack-infra15:34
anteayadevananda: awesome15:34
anteayawould you be willing to link them to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty15:35
devanandaack15:35
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-infra/elastic-recheck: Add query for 1320617  https://review.openstack.org/9408015:35
anteayathanks15:35
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra15:37
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z15:38
*** duran has joined #openstack-infra15:39
*** signed8bit has quit IRC15:41
anteayahey clarkb what are the chances you might be around between 1800 and 1900 to address https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-infra-improving-3rd-party-testing for the third party meeting?15:47
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-infra15:48
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC15:49
*** dkranz has quit IRC15:49
anteayahey jaypipes15:52
anteayahttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty15:53
anteayahttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-meeting-format15:53
jaypipesanteaya: reading...15:53
*** signed8bit has joined #openstack-infra15:53
krtayloranteaya, we might want to focus that meeting format a bit  ;)15:53
anteayajaypipes: and this was the announcement email: ttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-May/035182.html15:54
anteayakrtaylor: I'm open, what do you want to see?15:54
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna15:54
jaypipeskrtaylor, anteaya: did we agree to do the staggered neutron/cinder weeks?15:54
anteayajaypipes: we talked about that15:55
anteayaand then I got talking to some other folks, horizon, sahara15:55
anteayaand now ironic15:55
anteayathe priority for me is for openstack leads to talk to each other15:55
krtaylorjaypipes, anteaya I think that makes sense, given we could spend the meeting on any one of those15:56
anteayaI had mistakenly thought other programs were aware and following the process infra was setting out, that appears not to be the case15:56
krtayloranteaya, even if we get an initial nod from leads and delegation, I'm happy15:56
krtaylora representative that is15:57
anteayaright, so I don't think this is a conversation that will be the bulk of the focus forever, but I do want to focus on it right now15:57
jaypipeskrtaylor, anteaya: I can see both sides. Perhaps we can make it a firm thing that we will only do deep dives into systems that have posted to the infra list or dev list prior to the meeting? to prevent the free-for-all that happened in previous meetings?15:57
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC15:57
anteayathen once openstack leads have some sort of uniformity, then focus on the third party folks15:57
*** msabramo1 has joined #openstack-infra15:57
anteayajaypipes: I like that as a suggestion15:58
krtaylorhm, that sounds good15:58
anteayayes, some sort of indication the folks getting airtime know our process15:58
anteayajaypipes: can you propose some edits to agenda/etherpad to reflect that?15:58
*** msabramo has quit IRC15:58
krtayloranteaya, jaypipes but I think that some leading will need to happen, for example, scheduling the teams instead of waiting for them to sign up15:59
krotscheckDid I miss the discussion on the infra-specs repo?15:59
krotscheck‘cause I suddenly need it to exist.15:59
krotscheckSo if someone’s working on that....15:59
anteayakrtaylor: fair enough15:59
jeblairkrotscheck: we discussed it at the summit; anteaya has a review up to create it15:59
*** jlibosva has quit IRC15:59
anteayakrotscheck: do review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93929/16:00
krotscheckExcellent!16:00
krotscheckJust what I needed.16:00
jeblairit's at the top of my queue, right after fixing an urgent zuul bug16:00
anteayaoops chmouel needs to hear from me16:00
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-infra16:00
krtayloranteaya, I will try to dig out enough to spend some quality time with my pre-summit list of third party items for today's meeting16:00
anteayaah chmouel wants tests: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93929/2/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml16:00
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra16:00
anteayajeblair: what tests, if any do you want on the repo?16:00
anteayakrtaylor: thank you16:01
jeblairanteaya: only doc16:01
anteayajeblair: I will add doc tests16:01
pleia2good morning16:01
jeblairpleia2: how are you feeling?16:02
chmouelanteaya: yes i was assuming this was standard for the *-specs16:02
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-infra16:03
anteayachmouel: good instincts, thank you16:03
anteayapleia2: hey there16:03
jeblairthere's a spelling tox env; is anyone using that?16:04
jeblair(in the cookiecutter)16:05
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-infra16:05
lxslijeblair: any idea what fixed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1285288 please?16:05
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1285288 in nova "gate-nova-docs  No module named ...." [Undecided,Incomplete]16:05
*** Hal_ has quit IRC16:05
pleia2jeblair: hanging in there :) have some diagnostic stuff next tuesday16:06
jeblairlxsli: no idea.  i only marked it as not affecting openstack-ci16:07
*** ptippett is now known as ptippett[A]16:07
* ptippett[A] is now away - Reason : Auto-Away after 30 minutes16:07
lxsli:( thanks16:07
anteayapleia2: I hope the results point to a way forward16:07
pleia2anteaya: thanks, me too :)16:08
jeblairptippett[A]: would you please disable your away message?  thanks.16:08
*** vogxn has joined #openstack-infra16:10
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:10
*** vtapia has quit IRC16:11
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC16:11
openstackgerritAnita Kuno proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Create an infra-specs repo  https://review.openstack.org/9392916:11
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-infra16:13
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-infra16:13
*** praneshp_ has joined #openstack-infra16:14
*** pblaho has quit IRC16:15
*** msabramo1 has quit IRC16:16
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC16:17
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra16:18
*** hashar has quit IRC16:21
lxslianteaya: would you be interested in copying https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91801/ for infra-specs?16:21
*** mfer is now known as mattfarina16:21
*** jp_at_hp has quit IRC16:22
*** msabramo has joined #openstack-infra16:22
*** aconrad has joined #openstack-infra16:23
*** mattfarina is now known as mfer16:23
*** vogxn has quit IRC16:23
*** jp_at_hp has joined #openstack-infra16:24
*** afazekas_ is now known as afazekas16:24
*** yfried|gone has joined #openstack-infra16:24
anteayalxsli: that looks great16:25
anteayaI'm not sure what format jeblair wants from infra-specs16:25
anteayaI don't know if we want to follow the bp template that folks would use for a service repo or not16:25
lxsliOK, my main interest is avoiding another copy-paste of the base code :)16:26
anteayaright16:26
anteayaand agreed16:26
*** asselin has joined #openstack-infra16:26
lxsliIt seems only nova, neutron and tripleo-specs have the test so far16:27
lxsliThey've all diverged already :)16:27
anteayaI'm glat they do16:27
anteayaperhaps the others don't know about it16:27
lxsliYeah probably16:27
anteayado you feel like posting an email to the ml drawing awareness to its presence?16:28
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-infra16:28
lxsliYeah that's a great idea16:28
anteayacool16:28
phschwartzmorning all16:29
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-infra16:29
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC16:30
pleia2morning phschwartz16:30
anteayamorning phschwartz16:32
*** zns has quit IRC16:32
clarkbtrusty upgrade is in progress16:32
anteayaanyone know what meetbot will do if fed multiple arguments separated by whitespace to the startmeeting command?16:32
clarkbso you guys on the other side16:32
anteayaclarkb: for personal use, yeah?16:33
anteayanot for infra use, correct?16:33
clarkbcorrect16:33
anteayagreat16:33
clarkbon my main machine though16:33
anteayamight some folks exciting lurking in channel16:33
anteayaclarkb: see you later16:33
anteayaand good luck16:33
anteayaclarkb: so you might not be done in time for the third party meeting then, I guess16:34
pleia2anteaya: afaik it's #startmeeting title/team of the meeting16:34
pleia2anteaya: so there aren't arguments, the entire thing is a title with spaces16:35
anteayaah so spaces are allowed, cool16:35
anteayasorry by arguments I meant the title of the meeting16:35
jeblairanteaya: is this for third party ci?16:35
anteayayes16:35
jeblairanteaya: can you use 'third_party_ci'?16:35
jeblairanteaya: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party_ci/2014/16:36
anteayawas going to call it third-party16:36
jeblairanteaya: the title ends up in the url there ^16:36
anteayayes, I wanted to drop the ci portion while linking to those logs in the wiki16:36
jeblairanteaya: isn't ci important? :)16:36
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra16:36
anteayasince that format served a specific purpose and I feel the need for a broader purpose16:36
anteayaci is important16:36
anteayabut there are other issues as well16:36
anteayaso I didn't want people to feel their topic was excluded if it didn't deal directly with ci16:37
anteayaas a for instance16:37
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC16:37
anteayadavid_lyle has been asked by ceph for horizon to support ceph16:37
*** alff has quit IRC16:37
anteayadavid talked to me and we agree that is a conversation that fits in this space16:37
anteayabut it doesn't directly deal with ci16:38
jeblairanteaya: that seems like a significant scope expansion16:38
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:38
anteayaagreed16:38
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC16:39
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-infra16:39
anteayaand I don't feel the decision will take place in this space16:39
anteayabut it is a place to field the question, get some input and format it for the next place to discuss16:39
anteayain this instance to present to the tc16:39
*** aconrad has quit IRC16:39
jeblairthat very much sounds like a -dev ml discussion16:39
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:39
anteayafair enough16:40
jeblairwhich is the right (and required) place to have a discussion about things that are presented to the tc16:40
*** zns has quit IRC16:40
anteayaso this space shouldn't be a place where people can indicate this is what they have been approached about?16:40
david-lylefor me the real question is what is the policy regarding third party support, and when does a third party become a non-third party16:40
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-infra16:41
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra16:41
david-lylewhat's the line, so that I don't make one off decisions that come back to haunt me/us?16:41
*** yfried|gone has quit IRC16:41
anteayait is the avoidance of one off decisions that haunt us I am trying to address16:41
david-lyleyes16:42
anteayaand if the right place to discuss is tc or mailing list, then that can come out in the discussion16:42
david-lyleand I am very appreciative of that16:42
anteayathanks16:42
jeblairanteaya: i would say the third party ci meeting is not the place i would expect that sort of thing to be discussed.16:42
*** jpich has quit IRC16:43
anteayajeblair: where would you like someone like david-lyle to approach as a first step to get teh recommendation to take the discussion to the ml16:43
anteayasince neither he or I knew that before you said it16:43
jeblairanteaya: the -dev list is the universal discussion forum for the project, that's why the tc requires motions be presented there for discussion several days (nearly a week) before the tc votes on them16:44
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg16:44
jeblairso i think going there with this issue is a fine idea16:44
*** igor_ has quit IRC16:45
anteayathe issue I am looking to address is that david-lyle didn't know that16:45
anteayaand neither did I16:45
anteayaand I don't know waht other projects are doing regarding questions of this nature16:45
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra16:45
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra16:45
anteayaso having a forum for them to bring questions to the table helps them do the right thing, which is take it to the ml in this instance16:46
*** tnurlygayanov has joined #openstack-infra16:46
anteayaif this isn't it, and I am overstepping, that is fine16:46
anteayabut I do think such a venue needs to exist16:46
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Remove usage of docbook-properties.sh  https://review.openstack.org/9422716:47
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC16:48
david-lyleI guess the larger question for is that while services provide an extension framework for different backend drivers and that effects Horizon directly and presumably other projects to a lesser degree16:48
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-infra16:48
david-lyledo we not integrate any of that support directly into Horizon?16:49
jeblairdavid-lyle: yes, i think the existing driver support in other projects makes this a very interesting and complicated question.16:49
david-lyleyet we support multiple hypervisors in nova and expose hypervisor dependent settings in Horizon16:49
*** igor_ has quit IRC16:50
david-lyleto me trying to develop the UI, the difference isn't readily apparent, other than something was blessed at one point and other things are less blessed16:50
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-infra16:51
david-lylebut if the mailing list is the place, I can raise the larger question there16:52
*** derekh_ has quit IRC16:52
jeblairi think so; i think it's a big issue that all the projects need to think about -- especially since their decisions may affect horizon16:52
*** sarob has joined #openstack-infra16:53
* david-lyle working on said email16:54
*** jwiffy is now known as jgriffith16:55
anteayajeblair: initially I had thought that everyone was aware of infra third party requirements and it turns out they aren't16:55
anteayajeblair: cinder is doing their own thing, ironic is doing their own thing16:55
*** jerryz has joined #openstack-infra16:56
*** ihrachyshka_ has quit IRC16:56
*** Ajaeger1 has joined #openstack-infra16:56
jgriffithanteaya: can you clarify what "our own thing" is in this context?16:56
anteayajeblair: so I think the scope needs to be expanded to include discussion as opposed to just informing people what infra has decided and has documentation around16:56
anteayajgriffith: some vendors in the meeting want to test nightly or weekly16:57
david-lylejeblair, I don't think my particular questions cover everything anteaya was concerned about, I'm just a symptom16:57
jgriffithanteaya: oh... that16:57
anteayathat really isn't the spirt of the format we have16:57
anteayayeah16:57
anteayawhich to me is an indication there are other things16:57
jgriffithanteaya: frequency IMO is a seperate topic from implementation16:57
salv-orlandojogo: are you ok if I remove the fingerprint also for bug 1224001? It's capturing all the failures for bug 125389616:57
jeblairanteaya: what we have decided and have documentation around are our requirements.  third party test systems don't get to use gerrit if they don't meet it.  our requirements are around very basic things.  what actually get tested is up to the projects.16:57
jgriffithanteaya: I think the spirit is "unrealistic"16:57
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1224001 in neutron "test_network_basic_ops fails waiting for network to become available (dup-of: 1253896)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122400116:57
*** yfried|gone has joined #openstack-infra16:57
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1253896 in tempest/havana "Attempts to verify guests are running via SSH fails. SSH connection to guest does not work." [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/125389616:57
anteayajgriffith: frequency should still be a discussion though16:57
salv-orlandoI am already working on identifying a new fingerprint16:57
jgriffithanteaya: sure16:57
jgriffithanteaya: don't disagree16:57
jgriffithanteaya: that why we talked about it at the summit :)16:58
salv-orlandojogo_: ^^16:58
jeblairanteaya: and no, nightly/weekly is not an option.16:58
jgriffithjeblair: not an option?16:58
jeblairanteaya: we have a way of doing testing here, it's per-patch.16:58
jeblairjgriffith: no, not an option.16:58
*** yfried|gone is now known as yfried16:58
anteayaso I think we need a space to talk about this16:58
jgriffithjeblair: so you're saying all drivers are required to run their local CI on every single patch?16:58
anteayaunless we are just going to one at a time it in infra16:58
anteayaas we find out about things16:58
jgriffithjeblair: no flexibility, no starting point16:58
jeblairjgriffith: yes, that's how we test things here.16:58
jgriffithjeblair: it's all or nothing right off the bat16:59
jgriffithjeblair: that seems a bit... "unfair"16:59
jeblairjgriffith: not sure what you mean about starting?  are you talking about brining up a new 3rd party ci system?16:59
yfriedclarkb: still here? sorry I had to leave right after I asked you a question: how do I get the current ssh key/pass to localhost?16:59
jeblairjgriffith: we have a process for bootstrapping them gently16:59
*** maxbit has quit IRC16:59
*** zns has quit IRC16:59
*** homeless_ has joined #openstack-infra17:00
jgriffithjeblair: I'm confused, how is requiring you to have infrastructure that processes hundreds of patches a day "gentle"?17:00
jgriffithjeblair: given the resources that exist in OpenStack infra I think it's completely unrealistic to think that everybody is going to duplicate that17:00
jgriffithjeblair: unless I'm completely missing a detail here17:01
*** gyee has joined #openstack-infra17:01
jeblairjgriffith: lots of systems have done this.  a third party systems doesn't have to test nearly as many patches as openstack infra does17:01
krtaylorjgriffith, you don't have to turn everything on at once17:01
jgriffithjeblair: ummm.... so that's a bit contradictory17:01
jgriffithjeblair: you said "test every commit"17:01
jgriffithjeblair: then you just said "doesn't have to test every commit"17:01
jeblairjgriffith: but yeah, for a test to be effective, it has to reliably vote within a reasonable time on all patches, otherwise reviewers don't have the info they need to review17:02
jeblairjgriffith: no i said they don't have to test as many as infra does17:02
krtaylorjgriffith, that's what I was discussing at summit, you can start slow , with every merge, not patchset17:02
jgriffithjeblair: ok17:02
jeblairjgriffith: infra runs LOTS of tests, many of which never even complete.  :)17:02
jgriffithjeblair: fair17:02
jgriffithjeblair: sighhh17:02
jgriffithjeblair: I think this sort of changes the spirit of being open and making it easy to commit17:02
*** homeless has quit IRC17:03
jeblairjgriffith: this is mostly about not waisting developers time.  if test results aren't available to reviewers, what's the point?17:03
jgriffithjeblair: the point is to make sure a 3'rd party driver actually "work" in OpenStack17:03
jgriffithCurrently we do nothing but code review17:03
jgriffiththe reality is 1/2 of the drivers don't work17:04
*** homeless_ has quit IRC17:04
jgriffithSo the point is17:04
jgriffitheven nightly says "hey" this driver does what it advertises17:04
jgriffithCI isn't the right fit for "everything" IMO17:04
jgriffithand it becomes a distraction in this case17:04
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-infra17:04
jeblairjgriffith: what is the proposed feedback channel to developers?17:05
jgriffithjeblair: I think the confusion here is the intent of having the testing17:05
jgriffithjeblair: I don't care about continuous feedback on every patch17:05
jgriffithjeblair: I "DO" care about code quality of drivers17:05
krtaylorjgriffith, the only way to fix the driver situation is to get in front of the changes, that means CI17:05
jgriffithkrtaylor: I completely disagree17:06
jgriffithkrtaylor: but alas I'm certain I'll never win this debate17:06
krtaylorjgriffith, but I think it is less painful than you think17:06
anteayajgriffith: :(17:06
jgriffithkrtaylor: it's not the setup17:06
jgriffithkrtaylor: it's the resources and the maintenance17:07
jgriffithkrtaylor: my expectation is that each driver runs dsvm-full against itself.17:07
jgriffithkrtaylor: That requires signficant resources, you can't say that it doesn't17:07
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-infra17:07
*** aconrad has joined #openstack-infra17:07
jgriffithkrtaylor: jeblair I'd argue that you'll have one of two results in this case:17:08
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:08
jgriffith1. People just won't bother17:08
krtaylorjgriffith, the big pain point will be getting up to where the drivers are working, then stay in fron of it will be less work17:08
jgriffith2. You'll get bogus reporting back in that won't mean anything17:08
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-infra17:08
jgriffithkrtaylor: I've already started that work17:08
jgriffithkrtaylor: and I'd argue that you do that by starting with nightlies17:08
jgriffithkrtaylor: when that's running stable and smooth, you graduate to the next level17:08
jeblairjgriffith: 1) hasn't been at all the case with nova or neutron -- people are VERY motivated to have their driver supported17:09
jeblairjgriffith: why are you setting up a third party system?17:09
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-infra17:09
jgriffithjeblair: to verify that when OpenStack hits it's next milestone my product "works" with the bits being shipped17:09
jeblairjgriffith: 2) is a problem, but can/should be addressed by project devs providing feedback to the third party testers about the utility of their systems/tests17:09
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:09
jgriffithjeblair: and so that as a customer tha same can be verified17:09
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:10
jgriffithjeblair: krtaylor ok, I see this isn't really open for discussion17:10
jgriffithjeblair: krtaylor I'll play along17:10
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-infra17:10
krtaylorjgriffith, turn on a trickle of tests to start, not a firehose, with existing resources, then as resources become available add more tests and patchsets17:11
jgriffithkrtaylor: well that's pretty much what I was proposing17:11
jgriffithkrtaylor: but the opinion here was that it was "all or nothing"17:11
krtaylorjgriffith, I think it was frequency, not quantity17:12
jgriffithkrtaylor: aren't they directly related?17:12
jgriffithanyway... I popped over here to ask a completely different question :)17:13
jgriffithjeblair: I think I've missed a step in setting up cinder-specs...17:13
jgriffithjeblair: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94035/17:13
*** kaisero has joined #openstack-infra17:13
*** sarob has quit IRC17:13
jeblairjgriffith: for reference, nova probably has the most complete process around this; there may be some good info in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-third-party-ci17:13
*** mbacchi has quit IRC17:14
jgriffithjeblair: approval group for this?17:14
jgriffithjeblair: reading the etherpad.....17:14
jeblairjgriffith: check again now17:14
jeblairjgriffith: i just added you to the group (but there are 2 yous in the db -- make sure i got the right one)17:15
jgriffithjeblair: haha17:15
jgriffithjeblair: it's updated in my settings17:15
jgriffithjeblair: thanks17:16
jgriffithjeblair: back to the CI thing :)17:16
jeblairjgriffith: cool, you can add others as you see fit at https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/344,members17:16
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra17:16
jgriffithjeblair: awesome.. thanks17:16
jgriffithso my purpose here is different than Nova's I think17:16
zaroaconrad: you want another jjb release?17:16
jgriffithjeblair: In other words I'm at the "comptabilitly" stage17:17
*** hashar has joined #openstack-infra17:17
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add a doc8 stackforge project  https://review.openstack.org/9423617:17
jeblairjgriffith: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix is also relevant17:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-infra17:17
phschwartzanteaya: The patch that I talked to you about. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93953/17:17
jgriffithjeblair: But that's what i"m saying17:17
jgriffithjeblair: it's not relevant to me/Cinder17:17
jgriffithjeblair: Cinder has always said that "everybody" fulfills the entire API17:17
jgriffithjeblair: that's been since day 117:18
jgriffithjeblair: we don't have said matrix with "mix and match"17:18
jgriffithjeblair: you either run/work with the tests in Tempest or you're out17:18
jeblairjgriffith: i was referring to the 3 groups at the top, not the matrix itself17:18
jgriffithjeblair: I know... same thing17:18
jeblairjgriffith: 'driver works with cinder' and 'driver works with nova' seem very similar17:18
jgriffithjeblair: what I'm saying is there's no "Group A, B, C" etc17:18
jgriffithit works or it doesn't17:19
jgriffithif it "doesn't" it doesn't belong17:19
*** Longgeek has quit IRC17:19
rcarrill`zaro: hi there, in regards to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93773/ , would you be ok if I address the extended scope in other bug/changes? I rather land it as is to get some functionality, since the stuff you mention I will need to dig more, jeepyb does not have logic for that from what I can see...17:19
*** rcarrill` is now known as rcarrillocruz17:19
jgriffithjeblair: I see what you're saying17:19
*** signed8bit has quit IRC17:19
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:19
jgriffithjeblair: ok... so there's a good point there17:19
anteayaphschwartz: thanks, I'll look at it this afternoon17:19
jgriffithbut it's different when we're talking about 25-30 drivers vers 3 :)17:20
*** signed8bit has joined #openstack-infra17:20
mordredbtw - /me is a fan of "everyone fulfills the entire API" and wishes that were the case in more places17:20
jeblairjgriffith: yeah, that's the situation neutron is in, and their code reviews aren't pretty.  i suggested that we could run a zuul that everyone talked to and roll those up into one review, but people didn't like that.17:20
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC17:21
*** igor_ has quit IRC17:21
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra17:21
jgriffithjeblair: interesting17:21
*** julim has joined #openstack-infra17:21
jgriffithjeblair: honestly though, I see where you folks are coming from... I just want to express my goal :)17:22
jeblairjgriffith: tbh, i only really care about things that affect how developers review changes.  if running a test in a lab and telling people on (eg) the mailing list when it breaks works for you, i don't really have an opinion there.17:22
jgriffithjeblair: actually have some proof/evidence that a driver included in trunk can run the same tests that the reference driver runs17:22
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra17:22
jeblairjgriffith: which third party systems are allowed to leave comments on your project is also entirely up to you.17:22
jeblairas long as they meet the minimal requirements infra has17:23
jgriffithjeblair: well, I want all of them too :)17:23
jgriffithjeblair: I'm just not ready to try and herd everyone together for "every" patch that gets submitted17:23
jgriffitheventually I want that17:23
jgriffithbut not yet17:23
jgriffithand I don't want them to be gating17:23
jgriffithWhat I want is a dashboard17:24
jgriffithHere's the last time this driver was run and it's results17:24
jgriffithand here's a list of drivers with "no" results ever17:24
*** dprince has quit IRC17:24
zarorcarrillocruz: i've updated the change.17:24
mordredjgriffith: have you seen the dashboard for collating the driver tests that the mirantis guys have been working on?17:24
anteayaand I think this is a really good conversation to have17:25
*** hashar has quit IRC17:25
jgriffithmordred: indeed, I have17:25
anteayaand I am glad we are having it17:25
mordredjgriffith: it sounds like their goal is very similar to what you just stated17:25
mordredk. good17:25
jgriffithmordred: and that's an ok directin IMO17:25
anteayaand I think there are projects in addition to cinder who need the time and space to have the conversation17:25
* mordred has no direct opinions on that per se - just wanted to make sure you were aware of the effort17:25
jeblairjgriffith: our experience is that we end up with broken code fast if we don't test each commit17:25
jgriffithmordred: but if the infra team doesn't agree with any of this I am certainly not going to just go on my merry way and discard what you all would like to see17:26
anteayaand ensuring folks are aware of efforts from different spots is a goal17:26
*** mbacchi has joined #openstack-infra17:26
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-infra17:26
jgriffithanteaya: +117:26
jgriffithjeblair: meh... fair17:26
mordredjgriffith: ++17:26
jgriffithjeblair: but my opinion is that today we don't test at all which sucks17:26
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra17:26
anteayaagreed, not testing at all sucks17:26
jgriffithjeblair: when I required self-test/cert we found that only about 1/2 the drivers even worked17:27
jgriffiththat sucks!!17:27
*** james_li has quit IRC17:27
jgriffithI don't even care if it's "hey, this borked that on Monday"17:27
jgriffithI just want to make sure when we release everything is tested/working17:27
anteayaso I think different folks are on different places of the spectrum of getting this to not suck for third party17:27
anteayaand having a place to see where folks are is a good place to start17:28
jgriffithanteaya: really I just want it to NOT SUCK for customers building OpenStack Clouds17:28
anteayajgriffith: agreed17:28
anteayaI really want that too17:28
anteayaI think we all do17:28
jgriffithanteaya: I think so too17:28
anteayaand we are all currently in different places working towards that goal17:28
jgriffithalright... I'll let you all do some real work for a while....17:28
jgriffithbut I'll be back :)17:28
*** thedodd has quit IRC17:29
anteayaso I would like to create a discussion space to foster that direction17:29
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add a doc8 stackforge project  https://review.openstack.org/9423617:29
anteayajgriffith: will you be in the -meeting channel in 31 minutes?17:29
jgriffithanteaya: I certainly can be17:29
anteayajgriffith: I do hope so: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty17:30
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:30
anteayajgriffith: sorry I posted to -dev and ops and your channel17:30
anteayayou might have missed it though17:30
jgriffithanteaya: :)17:30
anteaya:D17:30
anteayathanks17:30
anteayaI really appreicate your understanding17:30
anteayayou are awesome17:30
anteayajeblair: I can see how the scope creep for this meeting caught you by surprise, it did for me as well17:31
anteayaif you can be available for the discussion of format for the meeting, I do welcome your input17:32
clarkbwoo only UI things appear to be broken17:32
anteayaclarkb: yay17:32
anteayaclarkb: can you be available to talk about our infra third party session in the third party meeting?17:33
anteayait starts in about 27 minutes in -meeting17:33
clarkbprobably17:33
anteayathanks17:33
clarkbI am going to keep hitting these issues with a hammer but the machine itself is working17:33
anteayaI would be appreciative17:33
anteayayay for a working machine17:34
clarkbI just don't have any panels and chromium thinks it should draw window decorations for itself17:34
anteayaha ha ha17:34
anteayathat must be enertaining17:34
clarkbalso dmenu is broken17:34
anteayathat is helpful17:34
mordredclarkb: what is the thing that you are poking at?17:34
anteayawas this a straight saucy to trusty upgrade?17:35
clarkbanteaya: yes (xubuntu)17:35
anteayafunny all the ui is borked17:35
clarkbmordred: the xfce top panel shows up then disappears. I recreated it from scratch and logged out and back in and same thing17:35
clarkbalso dmenu has no entries in it17:35
clarkband chromium is insistent on drawing window decorations17:36
andreafjeblair: ping17:36
clarkball in all small issues so I imagine I can get them sorted out17:36
*** marun has joined #openstack-infra17:36
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-infra17:36
clarkboh huh dmenu may be working but the font is the wrong color? I think there is something funny with compositing happening17:38
pleia2following up on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/translation-platform-discussion - do we have action items yet for who is going to set up zanata? are we waiting on anything from the zanata folks? I can start digging in if needed17:38
mordredclarkb: ah - I'd help but I did straight install when I installed trusty17:38
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC17:38
mordredpleia2: I believe the action item is "pleia2 will do that" :)17:38
pleia2mordred: clarkb uses goofy window manager with xubuntu anyway, I don't have his problems ;)17:38
* Ajaeger1 agrees with mordred 17:38
pleia2mordred: ok cool17:39
*** homeless has joined #openstack-infra17:39
Ajaeger1pleia2: We should have everything but if you run into problems, the zanata guys are committed to help17:39
mordredpleia2: and I _think_ we probably want to go the "run jboss ourselves and install war into it" route rather than the "download tarball with bundled deps in it" route17:39
mordredbut I'm probably crazy wrong about all of those words17:39
pleia2Ajaeger1: yeah, browsing the migration docs linked to the etherpad now17:39
clarkbpleia2: ya  Inotice xfce has more window manager knobs now and I wonder if I have offended them17:39
Ajaeger1pleia2: the idea was that we (you ;) set it up ourselves so that we know whether we can maintain it.17:39
clarkbif I change the size of the panel in the panel settings it resizes my windows but still no panel17:40
pleia2mordred, Ajaeger1 - ok, I'll take notes as I install this17:40
mordredpleia2: coolio17:40
pleia2thanks17:40
Ajaeger1thanks, pleia2 !17:40
mordredpleia2: btw - I have discovered that I can now just apt-get install mate - which means I'm now happy again because I have my clock applet17:40
mordredwithout having to run mint17:41
pleia2mordred: I still like having 3 clocks in my panel <317:41
pleia2no clicky to see them17:41
mordredpleia2: the shadow map and the "here are a list of 8 cities your frequent, their current weather and a button to change timezone to them" is my main draw to the gnome2 applet17:41
mordredpleia2: of course, 4 of those features "should not be" features of a clock applet - but it's really nice anyway :)17:42
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:42
pleia2mordred: yeah, I add multiple clocks and multiple weathers to my panel so I can always see them all without interaction17:42
mordredpleia2: I track too many cities - I'd get confuseled17:43
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-infra17:43
pleia2need to have philly weather so I can troll my friends back east17:43
pleia2ho ho, snowing! it's 70f here, again17:43
*** sarob has quit IRC17:43
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra17:43
mordredhaha17:44
*** james_li has joined #openstack-infra17:45
*** matjazp has quit IRC17:46
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:46
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-infra17:47
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra17:49
*** harlowja has quit IRC17:50
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-infra17:50
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC17:55
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed a change to openstack-infra/zuul: Add pipeline requirement for current-patchset.  https://review.openstack.org/9294217:57
jeblairclarkb: ^17:57
jeblairmordred: if you're around; a review of that ^ would be good (it's an operational problem)17:57
mordredjeblair: on it17:58
clarkbarg this is the weirdest thing. I think it may be a race in desktop startup17:59
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:00
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-infra18:00
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra18:00
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Use current-patchset pipeline requirement  https://review.openstack.org/9424318:00
jeblairand there's the complementary change18:00
mordredjeblair: are there contexts in which people would want to set current-patchset to false? I ask because it seems like perhaps true should be the default18:01
mordredbut it's VERY possible I have not thought it through enough18:01
jeblairmordred: i haven't thought of one, but "don't care" is the current default18:01
*** krotscheck has quit IRC18:01
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-infra18:02
jeblairmordred: setting it to false means "this pipeline will never run on the current patchset".  i'd love to see the example of that use case.  but it matches "open" which is also tri-state.18:02
jeblairmordred: that consistency is why i went ahead with it instead of making it binary.18:02
mordredah. gotcha18:02
mordredthanks18:02
clarkbwoot looks like my test was mostly useful after all18:03
mordredjeblair: then in that case, I understand, agree, and the change looks good to me18:04
*** alff has joined #openstack-infra18:06
*** bhuvan has joined #openstack-infra18:07
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed a change to openstack-infra/zuul: Add pipeline requirement for current-patchset.  https://review.openstack.org/9294218:07
jeblairpep8^18:07
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-infra18:08
*** jooools has quit IRC18:09
*** timrc-afk is now known as timrc18:10
zaropleia2: need help checking out tag using bzr.18:10
* mordred afks again18:10
*** prad has joined #openstack-infra18:10
*** julim has quit IRC18:11
zaropleia2: how would i get this? https://launchpad.net/gearman-java/trunk/0.0618:11
pleia2zaro: hey18:11
jeblairclarkb: are you reviewing https://review.openstack.org/92942  ?18:11
*** krotscheck has quit IRC18:12
pleia2zaro: the syntax is something like bzr branch tag:0.06 lp:gearman-java18:12
zaropleia2: wait that's the wrong one.  i want 0.6 from history. it's rev no. 9518:12
*** maxbit has quit IRC18:12
pleia2but let me doublecheck18:12
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-infra18:13
*** alff has quit IRC18:13
clarkbjeblair: yes18:13
*** julim has joined #openstack-infra18:13
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra18:13
jeblairclarkb: ok, no rush, just checking18:13
*** alff has joined #openstack-infra18:13
zaropleia2: i have latest checked out, history shows shows trunk is at rev 96.  i just want to get revno. 9518:14
clarkbjeblair: yup just got through it18:15
clarkblooking at the complementary change now18:15
*** hipster has quit IRC18:15
*** LinuxJedi has left #openstack-infra18:16
pleia2zaro: ah, that's easier then, sec18:16
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra18:16
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra18:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:17
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC18:18
*** andreaf has quit IRC18:18
pleia2zaro: so you can: bzr diff -r 9518:19
pleia2(I couldn't actually find a 0.6 tag, but maybe I'm doing something wrong, it's been a while)18:20
pleia2zaro: or: bzr revert 9t18:20
*** marun has quit IRC18:20
pleia2to actually go back18:20
pleia2bzr revert 9518:20
*** igor_ has quit IRC18:21
zarolog still shows 96 as latest.  so it's only reverted the change, not checkout from there.  can bzr not checkout from a revision?18:22
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/zuul: Add pipeline requirement for current-patchset.  https://review.openstack.org/9294218:23
pleia2zaro: oh, then you want: bzr branch -r 95 lp:gearman-java18:23
pleia2zaro: (you had mentioned you already had checked it out, so I thought you wanted to work with that)18:23
*** krotscheck has quit IRC18:24
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-infra18:24
*** maxbit has quit IRC18:24
zaropleia2: thanks.  that was impossible to find on internet.18:25
pleia2zaro: yeah, bzr has great documentation for the basics, but beyond that it can be a bit hairy18:26
SpamapSpleia2: thats because bzr only has the basics. :)18:26
SpamapSnone of those scary knobs that break things and lose data. ;)18:26
*** sweston has joined #openstack-infra18:27
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra18:28
pleia2SpamapS: haha18:28
*** doude has joined #openstack-infra18:32
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra18:32
*** pelix has quit IRC18:34
*** briancurtin has joined #openstack-infra18:35
*** sweston has quit IRC18:35
*** jp_at_hp has quit IRC18:35
*** sweston has joined #openstack-infra18:35
briancurtinAnyone familiar with testr together with coverage to understand why "tox -e cover" in https://github.com/stackforge/python-openstacksdk is trying to import a nonexistent "openstacksdk" module?18:36
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-infra18:37
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-infra18:38
clarkbbriancurtin: I am going to guess that the distutils hook there is assuming that the python module has the same name as the name at https://github.com/stackforge/python-openstacksdk/blob/master/setup.cfg#L2 less the python- prefix18:39
*** Ajaeger1 has quit IRC18:39
clarkbbriancurtin: it needs to know what to collect coverage for and I think that may be a pbr assumption18:40
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra18:40
briancurtinclarkb: i had figured it was some magic stripping off the python- prefix. i guess i should look at pbr then to find a place to say what the real name is?18:40
clarkbbriancurtin: ya18:41
briancurtincool, thanks18:41
krotscheckphschwartz: Do y’all have a vinz channel yet?18:42
clarkbbriancurtin: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/pbr/tree/pbr/testr_command.py#n6118:42
clarkbbriancurtin: I think you can just pass that value in after the --coverage in tox.ini18:42
*** trainoti has joined #openstack-infra18:44
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-infra18:46
jeblairkrotscheck, phschwartz: this is a great channel to talk about vinz18:47
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra18:47
krotscheckjeblair: Should I deprecate #storyboard?18:47
jeblairkrotscheck: i think that would be a good idea -- i think it will promote more overlap18:48
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-infra18:48
openstackgerritSean Dague proposed a change to openstack-infra/jeepyb: use exceptions instead of return True/False  https://review.openstack.org/9419618:49
krotscheckjeblair: Not certain I agree there. This channel gets noisy, and trying to pick out individual conversation threads is a bit of a PITA.18:49
*** whoops has joined #openstack-infra18:50
krotscheckThough I don’t have a better suggestion on how to make sure that client-related discussions happen in the same place.18:50
*** hashar has joined #openstack-infra18:50
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC18:51
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC18:51
*** hipster has quit IRC18:51
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-infra18:51
pleia2sdague: do you have your slides from your ER talk online somewhere?18:51
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra18:52
*** maxbit has quit IRC18:52
sdaguepleia2: https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1qlncj7nrvydcd/Elastic%20Recheck.odp will get you the latest version18:53
sdagueI haven't posted them proper yet18:53
krotscheckone vinz related question: Does the Gerrit API support CORS?18:53
jeblairkrotscheck: it does, but it's fairly managable with strategic highlighting.  i think the key is that there's a good group of people interested in these problems here who can contribute.18:53
jeblairkrotscheck: (that was response to previous statement, not api question)18:54
krotscheckjeblair: Figured.18:54
jeblairkrotscheck: don't know off hand, haven't tried.  docs are here: https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/rest-api.html18:54
jeblairkrotscheck: and you may have luck in #gerrit18:55
pleia2sdague: thanks, was looking for the awesome flow graphic to include in the ES blog post18:55
* jeblair afks for lunch18:55
sdaguepleia2: yep, that's the source version :)18:55
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-infra18:55
*** krotscheck has quit IRC18:56
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-infra18:57
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-infra18:59
phschwartzjeblair: I would agree it would allow for more overlap of people.19:00
phschwartzkrotscheck: Hadn't created the channel. I planed too, but if jeblair thinks it is better here, I am for that.19:00
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra19:01
krtaylorthanks anteaya, that was a good kickoff19:01
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC19:01
*** Ryan_Lane1 has joined #openstack-infra19:01
anteayakrtaylor: thank you, yes I am pleased with how it went19:01
anteayaI gave myself some action items, I have to get used to using the #action tag19:01
clarkbpleia2: I haven't responded to your email yet but lgtm19:02
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:02
clarkbpleia2: also its a bit embarrassing that we are still running kibana 2 >_>19:02
krtayloranteaya, hehheh #action use #action more19:02
pleia2clarkb: thanks19:03
jerryzanteaya: could you elaborate more about concerns on 3rd party CI in gate pipeline?19:03
anteayakrtaylor: yes19:03
clarkbalso I think I have working xfce and dmenu now19:03
pleia2\o/19:03
clarkb+ xmonad19:03
jerryzfor stackforge, in particular19:03
anteayajerryz: it isn't a concern it is a process19:03
clarkbI put a sleep prior to xmonad --replace and that allows xfce to start everything it needs first without being confused by xmonad19:04
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC19:04
anteayato be in the gate requires a project to go through the incubation and integration process19:04
clarkbso warning hax19:04
pleia2hah :)19:04
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:04
krotscheckphschwartz: So, initial tests on the gerrit API shows that it just doesn’t respond to OPTIONS requests at all.19:04
anteayathis is a process outlined and regulated by the tc19:04
krotscheckphschwartz: Which means that CORS is likely not supported.19:04
krtaylorjerryz, are you referring to your local zuul/jenkins or upstream community's19:05
anteayaany project can go through the process, but a project that has not gone through the process doesn't get into the gate19:05
krotscheckphschwartz: It might be possible to just have the vhost proxy to an existing gerrit install so we don’t encounter the browser sandbox.19:05
rcarrill`could any core reviewers have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93773/1 ?19:06
jerryzkrtaylor: adding them in my local zuul is not literally gating because only community's has the privilege to block or merge a patch19:06
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra19:06
phschwartzkrotscheck: I was experiencing the same issue internal here.19:07
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra19:07
anteayajerryz: yes and that priviledge is administered by the tc as I outlined above19:08
*** maxbit has joined #openstack-infra19:09
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra19:09
jerryzanteaya: i was talking about the 3rd party jenkins jobs getting into gate pipeline. not giving 3rd party zuul/gerrit-trigger plugin the same privilege as community's zuul19:10
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC19:10
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-infra19:10
rcarrillocruzzaro: thx for the +119:11
jerryzanteaya: like registering jenkins to zuul.o.o and let zuul distribute 3rd party jobs to 3rd party environments19:11
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz19:12
*** mkoderer has quit IRC19:12
anteayajerryz: okay I think we might not be using the same meanings for the words we are typing19:12
anteayawhat do you mean when you say gate pipeline?19:12
anteayathat has a very specific meaning and I don't know what you mean when you use it19:13
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek19:14
jerryzanteaya: my point is it is useful to test against several patches merged together within a project or across projects, which is done in gate pipeline19:14
anteayayes, which is why we use it19:15
jerryzanteaya: check pipeline is per patch test19:15
anteayamostly for speed19:15
anteayayes it is19:15
jerryzanteaya: what if a 3rd party test would fail on patches merged together, we submit a bug later? but that would be hard to investigate19:16
anteayajerryz: have you come across that?19:16
anteayado you have a specific example of the third part test that passed in check and failed as a result of patches merged together in the gate?19:17
jerryzanteaya: no. just saying19:17
anteayaokay, when you have a specific example come back with the details19:17
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra19:17
anteayathen we have something to look at and can work towards a solution at that time19:17
anteayais that fair?19:18
jerryzanteaya: the same reason as other gate- jobs19:18
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra19:18
*** Hal_ has quit IRC19:18
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC19:19
anteayaright now you want to engage in a hypothetical conversation, and I would like to address our actual issues19:19
phschwartzkrotscheck: Interesting when I hit the api from python it works like a charm on a local instance, fails against reviews.openstack.org19:19
phschwartzjavascript fails on both19:19
anteayaand I have agreed to discuss this again with you, if and when this becomes an actual issue19:19
jerryzanteaya: fair19:19
anteayajerryz: great thank you19:19
krotscheckphschwartz: What version are you running locally? I think the infra gerrit is still a couple of versions behind.19:20
phschwartz2.8.419:20
* anteaya heads out for a walk19:20
krotscheckphschwartz: So that’s not it. Hrm.19:20
krotscheckphschwartz: Well, the JS thing is probably the browser sandbox, that’s a known thing.19:21
phschwartzI will have to find a work around for that with vinz19:21
clarkbanteaya: jerryz fwiw I think jeblair has been considering using authenticated gearman with ACLs to have our zuul run jobs in other jenkinses19:21
krotscheckphschwartz: mod_proxy?19:21
clarkbI don't think this completely solves what you are talking about but it may be one mechanism to do that should we get it working19:21
phschwartzkrotscheck: I haven't tried it, but it should work (fingers crossed)19:22
clarkbkrotscheck: we are only one minor version behind now and that released during the summit iirc19:22
jerryzclarkb: great19:22
*** igor_ has quit IRC19:22
phschwartzLet me setup mod_proxy and try it19:23
*** hipster has quit IRC19:23
clarkbok I *think* I have this machine working the way I want it to19:23
jerryzclarkb: after zuul.o.o 's gearman server get an idea what jobs other jenkinses have, we could add 3rd party jobs in check, gate pipelines or just in check pipeline19:24
*** lcheng has quit IRC19:24
clarkbjerryz: well maybe19:24
clarkbthere is still a lot of concern around depending on things we have no contro lover19:24
clarkbso for example if a third party system were to be turned off for a week and we gate on it there is nothing we could do to merge code other than remove those tests from teh gate19:25
clarkbso I think current feeling on that subject is to simply never gate on it in the first place19:25
jerryzclarkb: that is a issue about trust , reliability19:26
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC19:26
clarkbjerryz: well its deeper than that but that is part of it19:26
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra19:26
clarkbthere is also concern for making devs depend on something they have no influence over19:26
*** praneshp_ has quit IRC19:29
openstackgerritRicardo Carrillo Cruz proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Parameterize SSL certificate attributes on review.pp manifest  https://review.openstack.org/9368719:29
*** marun has joined #openstack-infra19:31
*** dims has joined #openstack-infra19:34
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-infra19:35
clarkbpleia2: any idea why light locker is distinct from xscreensaver?19:38
clarkbpleia2: I only ask because it is possible to get both to lock the screen requiring your password twice19:38
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-infra19:40
pleia2clarkb: I don't know why, might be because they both want to interface with the suspend system if it's unlocking that, so they fight, I know you simply can't have them both (was written about here: http://xubuntu.org/news/screen-locking-in-xubuntu-14-04/ )19:40
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:41
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:42
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-infra19:42
clarkbah I can get rid of one or the other apparently. I htink ahve have them both working right now though19:42
*** Ryan_Lane1 is now known as Ryan_lane19:44
*** Ryan_lane has joined #openstack-infra19:44
*** Ryan_lane is now known as Ryan_Lane19:44
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:44
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra19:47
*** julim has quit IRC19:49
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:51
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:52
*** duran_ has joined #openstack-infra19:52
*** hipster has quit IRC19:52
*** simonmcc has quit IRC19:52
*** arnaud_ has joined #openstack-infra19:52
*** julim has joined #openstack-infra19:53
*** duran_ has quit IRC19:53
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-infra19:53
*** jaypipes has quit IRC19:53
*** greghaynes has quit IRC19:53
*** gothicmindfood has quit IRC19:53
*** jgriffith has quit IRC19:53
*** gothicmindfood has joined #openstack-infra19:54
*** amcrn has quit IRC19:54
*** zul has quit IRC19:54
*** jraim has quit IRC19:54
*** duran has quit IRC19:54
*** ewindisch has quit IRC19:54
*** soren has quit IRC19:54
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC19:54
*** mdenny has quit IRC19:54
*** hughsaunders has quit IRC19:54
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-infra19:54
*** sdake has quit IRC19:55
*** tteggel has quit IRC19:55
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC19:55
*** tteggel has joined #openstack-infra19:55
*** dangers_away has quit IRC19:55
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-infra19:56
*** soren has joined #openstack-infra19:56
*** whoops_ has joined #openstack-infra19:56
*** cp16net has quit IRC19:56
*** sarob has joined #openstack-infra19:56
*** jraim has joined #openstack-infra19:57
*** dangers_away has joined #openstack-infra19:57
*** maxbit has quit IRC19:57
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-infra19:57
*** packet has quit IRC19:58
*** zul has joined #openstack-infra19:58
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-infra19:58
*** whoops has quit IRC19:58
*** whoops_ is now known as whoops19:58
*** praneshp_ has joined #openstack-infra20:00
*** praneshp_ has quit IRC20:00
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-infra20:00
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:01
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-infra20:01
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC20:01
*** melwitt has quit IRC20:02
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-infra20:02
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-infra20:02
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-infra20:02
*** rlandy has quit IRC20:02
*** dangers_away has quit IRC20:02
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-infra20:03
*** dangers_away has joined #openstack-infra20:04
*** hughsaunders has joined #openstack-infra20:05
*** alff has quit IRC20:06
*** sdake has joined #openstack-infra20:07
*** simonmcc has joined #openstack-infra20:08
jeblairrestarting zuul to pick up the requires change20:08
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-infra20:08
clarkbk20:08
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-infra20:09
jerryzjeblair: i see in dev list there is someone reporting dead loop of merge-failure20:10
clarkbjerryz: that is the issue jeblair is fixing right now20:10
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC20:10
clarkbjeblair: I think I am all set on trusty now. Going to review the stack of gertty changes then update gertty to dive into reviews20:10
clarkbI suppsoe I should test the tox fix first20:10
*** praneshp_ has joined #openstack-infra20:10
jeblairjerryz: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94243/20:11
jeblairzuul is restarted and i approved that ^ change; when it lands and zuul updates, we should be good20:11
*** dims has quit IRC20:11
*** dims has joined #openstack-infra20:12
*** Hal_ has joined #openstack-infra20:13
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra20:14
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:14
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-infra20:14
openstackgerritSean Dague proposed a change to openstack-infra/jeepyb: add dashboard support to jeepyb  https://review.openstack.org/9426020:16
*** zns has quit IRC20:16
*** sarob has quit IRC20:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-infra20:17
*** dims has quit IRC20:18
clarkbI just ran tox -epy27 in zuul's repo with tox 1.7.2.dev1. I think the fix is working \o/20:18
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra20:18
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/config: Use current-patchset pipeline requirement  https://review.openstack.org/9424320:18
*** Hal_ has quit IRC20:19
clarkbjeblair: what is upgrade path for gertty with the alembic change? do I need to delete the existing DB?20:21
clarkblooks like there is a call to migrate in db.py so it may do it gracefully?20:21
jeblairclarkb: no, it should stamp your existing db and then upgrade20:21
jeblairyep20:21
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:22
*** sarob has quit IRC20:22
aconradzaro: yes, another jjb release would be great20:22
jeblairclarkb: (just note that if that changes again before merging, you might have to drop your local db or otherwise manually fix it)20:23
*** igor_ has quit IRC20:23
clarkbah that is what the stamp() does20:23
clarkbjeblair: yeah not too worried about it20:23
clarkbjeblair: what does the mako template do? did it generate the initial_schema.py file?20:23
*** Ryan_Lane1 has joined #openstack-infra20:23
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC20:24
jeblairclarkb: i believe the mako template is what's used when you autogenerate a new schema (so yes, and will be used in future too)20:24
jeblairs/schema/revision/20:25
clarkbjeblair: +1 just one comment in the config file20:25
jeblairclarkb: answer is "yes", oddly enough.  :)20:26
anteayajeblair: do you want vinz to have channel #vinz or #openstack-vinz?20:27
jeblairanteaya: i would like discussion to be in #openstack-infra.  see scrollback.20:27
anteayaah sorry20:28
jeblairanteaya: (applies to storyboard too)20:28
anteayagreat thanks20:29
* anteaya edits her comment on the vinz repo creation patch20:29
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz20:30
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-infra20:30
jeblairdelete from change_messages where change_id=92477 and author_id=3 and patchset_patch_set_id=3 and date(written_on)="2014-05-19";20:30
jeblairclarkb: i'm going to run that on production gerrit to get rid of 10149 extra rows.20:30
jeblairclarkb: look good?20:30
clarkbisn't jenkins user 2?20:31
clarkbotherwise yes lgtm20:31
jeblairclarkb: mordred is 220:31
clarkbah ok20:31
anteayaso we want vinz-webclient-core and vinz-ptl gerrit groups?20:32
anteayas/so/do20:32
*** julim has quit IRC20:32
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC20:32
sdaguejeblair: so I'm starting to look into zuul, and was curious to find this - https://github.com/openstack-infra/zuul/blob/master/zuul/trigger/gerrit.py#L348-L35420:33
sdaguewhere is that dependsOn getting calculated?20:33
jeblairsdague: it's supplied by gerrit20:34
anteayaphschwartz: what does use-storyboard: true do in review.projects.yaml?20:34
anteayaphschwartz: do you know, because I don't20:34
krotscheckanteaya: It adds that project to the ones loaded into storyboard.20:34
*** Hefeweizen has joined #openstack-infra20:35
krotscheckBasically “Hey, I’d rather use storyboard than launchpad, let me use it”20:35
anteayakrotscheck: cool, and we want that with vinz?20:36
sdaguejeblair: it seems that depends on is 1 -> 1, however neededBy code already supports a list. Do you think injecting additional data in that area would be the right approach here?20:36
anteayawas that a project we gave the go ahead for using storyboard?20:36
jeblairanteaya: yeah, any time we can start a new infra project on storyboard yes; it's mostly the ones with existing bugs that we haven't moved over20:36
anteayathere is just a lot of stuff in this patch I have never seen before, hence all the questions20:36
anteayajeblair: good enough20:36
*** amcrn has quit IRC20:36
clarkbjeblair: can you see my comment on the update column helper script change? I am going to grab lunch now but I have a small concern in that change20:37
anteayaso last question we want continuious publication from master on vinz, same as storyboard20:37
*** ramashri has quit IRC20:37
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-infra20:39
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC20:41
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-infra20:41
anteayaI'll post my comments thus far on the patch, it needs another patchset anyway20:41
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-infra20:42
jeblairclarkb: responded20:42
*** zns has joined #openstack-infra20:43
clarkbjeblair: gotcha that is what the other index code is for20:43
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra20:45
pleia2did the Zanata folks say anything about OS preference? It's supported by Redhat so I wonder if we may have another CentOS candidate on our hands20:45
jeblairSergeyLukjanov: if you have a minute to look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92745/ that would be nice -- i think i found the problems you were talking about and fixed them.20:45
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-infra20:45
clarkbpleia2: it should run on ubuntu it is very similar to gerrit20:46
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:46
clarkband I think they have puppet we can use20:46
pleia2clarkb: ok good, I'll go that route first20:46
pleia2and I'll ask them about puppet20:47
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra20:47
jeblairpleia2: they indicated they are very happy to help with this, though they are normally in an AU timezone20:47
* pleia2 nods20:48
pleia2I joined their channel and user list20:48
*** amcrn has quit IRC20:51
*** hipster has quit IRC20:52
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC20:55
phschwartzanteaya: I will submit a new patchset for you.20:57
openstackgerritPhilip Marc Schwartz proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Creation of vinz project in the openstack-infra scheme.  https://review.openstack.org/9395320:58
sdaguejeblair: what do you think about turning dependsOn into a collection, that will support the current set of operations that the needed_changes bit supports, but will let us have multiple20:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-infra20:59
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-infra20:59
*** pdmars has quit IRC20:59
morganfainbergclarkb, pleia2, anteaya, anyone know if it is more appopriate to access the approvals['type'] field in gerrit's response or the approval['description'] to know if it's a "Workflow" score?21:00
clarkbmorganfainberg: 'type'21:00
* morganfainberg is trying to fix WIP tracking in reviewday21:00
morganfainbergclarkb, thanks!21:01
*** james_li_ has joined #openstack-infra21:01
morganfainbergclarkb, pleia2, second question, do we want to exclude WIP reviews from reviewday? would be easy to do [i think] vs. just pushing them to the floor21:01
morganfainbergclarkb, pleia2, since i'm fixing reviewday up as is21:01
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-infra21:02
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-infra21:02
*** james_li has quit IRC21:03
*** james_li_ is now known as james_li21:03
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC21:04
pleia2morganfainberg: actually, excluding them entirely makes sense to me, I'd say we put up a review and see what dprince things too (he's the other core reviewer)21:04
pleia2s/things/thinks21:04
sdaguejeblair: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/zuul-depends-on - at the bottom is my current thinking, would be curious to get your thoughts, so I can go dive on that tomorrow21:04
morganfainbergpleia2, great! I'll shuffle this around and instead of flooring the value to 0 exclude them. wont be hard to floor the value if that turns out to be undesireable21:05
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-infra21:05
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-infra21:05
morganfainbergpleia2, thanks!21:05
*** mfer has quit IRC21:05
*** rfolco has quit IRC21:06
anteayaphschwartz: thanks21:07
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC21:07
*** sballe has joined #openstack-infra21:08
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-infra21:08
*** Ryan_Lane1 is now known as Ryan_Lane21:09
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-infra21:09
jeblairsdague: that sounds good21:09
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed a change to openstack-infra/reviewday: Remove WIP reviews from reviewday report  https://review.openstack.org/9426621:09
sdaguejeblair: cool21:10
morganfainbergpleia2, ^ that _should_ do it. *double checks*21:10
pleia2morganfainberg: thanks, I'll test it here too :)21:10
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek21:14
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra21:19
*** igor_ has quit IRC21:23
morganfainbergpleia2, i think i found a bug in reviewday testing it here.21:23
pleia2k21:23
morganfainbergpleia2, Idf078705e2f5305539aaff62396ec9699e31e568 doesn't have any patchsets21:24
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz21:24
morganfainbergpleia2, my guess is we need some extra error handling in here. i'll propose some fixes to address these key errors21:24
pleia2morganfainberg: hm, ok thanks21:24
morganfainbergpleia2, http://pasteraw.com/nac78frdwllblqvjyxg23qctzqu988z - if youre interested21:26
*** zns has quit IRC21:26
morganfainbergok the specific error case21:26
pleia2morganfainberg: thanks21:26
morganfainbergoh. we already catch the error, we just reraise21:27
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-infra21:27
morganfainberg*blink*21:27
pleia2hmm21:28
morganfainberghttp://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewday/tree/bin/reviewday#n7721:28
morganfainbergi'm guessing we don't want to re-raise in these cases.21:29
*** atiwari has quit IRC21:30
andreafjeblair: hi, you around?21:31
*** melwitt has quit IRC21:32
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-infra21:32
*** harlowja has quit IRC21:32
*** mbacchi has quit IRC21:33
andreafjeblair: I'm trying to find out what was the fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1285288 - and hoping you may know - from you comment on the issue21:33
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1285288 in nova "gate-nova-docs  No module named ...." [Undecided,Incomplete]21:33
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-infra21:33
*** trainoti has quit IRC21:34
*** aconrad has quit IRC21:36
*** prad has quit IRC21:36
jeblairandreaf: i have no idea, i only removed that bug from openstack-ci because i felt it was misfiled.21:41
andreafjeblair: ah ok too bad21:41
andreafjeblair: I'm hitting the issue now so trying to find out where it came from21:42
*** dims has joined #openstack-infra21:44
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek21:45
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed a change to openstack-infra/reviewday: Remove WIP reviews from reviewday report  https://review.openstack.org/9426621:45
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed a change to openstack-infra/reviewday: Ensure mergeprop instantiation failures are not fatal  https://review.openstack.org/9427221:45
morganfainbergpleia2, looks like reviewday data stopped updating a few hours ago due to the mergeprop bug. those fixes should solve both issues.21:46
andreaflcostantino: ping21:46
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-infra21:46
lcostantinoandreaf,  hi21:46
andreaflcostantino: I'm hitting a bug you filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1285288 and I was wondering if you ever found the cause for it?21:47
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1285288 in nova "gate-nova-docs  No module named ...." [Undecided,Incomplete]21:47
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra21:47
*** prad has joined #openstack-infra21:47
lcostantinoandreaf,  no, after reissuing another build, it started to work21:48
*** virmitio has joined #openstack-infra21:48
andreaflcostantino: ok maybe I've just been unlucky and hit that twice - thanks I'll try again21:49
lcostantinoandreaf,  ok, does it happend on your local env if you try to build docs?21:49
*** mriedem has quit IRC21:49
andreafyes it happened in my local env - well it's odd because I had the error in the logs but tox reported ok21:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC21:51
*** aconrad has joined #openstack-infra21:52
*** hipster has quit IRC21:52
pleia2morganfainberg: hm, actually this change from last week is failing in the same way https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93901/ not sure yet what's going on21:53
morganfainbergyeah looks like a pip error21:53
morganfainbergwell, pip related issue21:53
morganfainbergor pypi21:53
morganfainbergor i might be mis-reading it21:54
*** andreaf has quit IRC21:55
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz21:55
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-infra21:55
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/config: Hacking: enable the Python 3 gate.  https://review.openstack.org/8469021:55
*** hashar has quit IRC21:57
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra21:58
openstackgerritEdward Raigosa proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Implement security class for gerrit base security  https://review.openstack.org/9400721:59
openstackgerritMichael Krotscheck proposed a change to openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Added search icon to typeahead fields  https://review.openstack.org/9427321:59
*** Kiall has quit IRC21:59
*** markmcclain has quit IRC21:59
*** _afazekas is now known as afzekas22:00
*** rfolco has quit IRC22:00
*** afzekas is now known as afazekas22:01
notmynameclarkb: were you in the "swift growing pains" talk last week?22:01
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC22:02
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC22:03
*** igor_ has quit IRC22:03
notmynamejeblair: what's the feasibility of adding a new tag/column to reviews in gerrit?22:03
notmynamejeblair: last week we talked about having "core sponsors" for patches. I'm planning on implementing that in a soft way (informal tracking on a wiki page) to start, but it could be interesting to actually have that in gerrit I think22:03
*** sweston has quit IRC22:04
openstackgerritAnita Kuno proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Create an infra-specs repo  https://review.openstack.org/9392922:04
*** sweston has joined #openstack-infra22:05
anteayaediting the commit message and topic name in the gui can be undone by a subsequent patch submitting via ssh22:05
anteayanow I know22:06
*** sweston has quit IRC22:06
anteayas/submitting/submitted22:06
*** homeless has quit IRC22:06
clarkbnotmyname: I was22:07
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-infra22:08
clarkbnotmyname: I don't understand how a new review column would help "core sponsors" though22:08
pleia2so reviewday checks are failing, seems to be a pep8 thing? maybe something in the tox.ini needs to be updated, I'm stumped http://logs.openstack.org/66/94266/2/check/gate-reviewday-pep8/8d3aec1/console.html22:08
*** sweston has joined #openstack-infra22:09
notmynameclarkb: just thinking of a central place already in a dev/reviewer workflow that show's patches assigned to you22:10
notmynameclarkb: different than "reviewers". more like "of the special reviewers on this patch (core), this person is the most specialist (core sponsor)"22:11
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi22:11
clarkbnotmyname: so you can add a column for that but would have to set that value manually (as the person being the specialist)22:11
notmynameclarkb: ya, that's what I'd expect and want22:12
notmynameclarkb: this is an experiment to be sure. so we'll be informal to start. but if it works, I'm just thinking of ways to integrate it more tightly with the openstack dev workflow22:12
clarkbpleia2: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewday/tree/setup.py#n18 is the thing breaking22:12
clarkbpleia2: mordred may have ideas on how to make that machinery work better22:13
clarkbnotmyname: ok, just making sure that is what you had in mind22:14
clarkbI was thinking it would be more automagic22:14
jeblairkrotscheck: the best way to ensure that patches land in a particular order is to make them dependent in git; if you don't want to do that but still would like an informal ordering, noting in the _later_ commit message would be a good idea22:14
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov|away22:15
jeblairkrotscheck: (i'm reviewing 93545 after having approved the one it referenced)22:15
*** doug-fish has left #openstack-infra22:15
clarkbnotmyname: https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/config-labels.html you probably want a -1 to 1 label that copies min and max values using the NoOP function22:15
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/storyboard: Stories can now be filtered by assignee_id  https://review.openstack.org/9191222:15
jeblairkrotscheck: i don't think it matters in this case, just noting for future reference22:15
clarkbnotmyname: actually do 0 to +1 and copy max value22:16
clarkbnotmyname: doing that would allow reviewers to +1 as a specialist on that change22:16
clarkband set to 0 if that changes22:16
jeblairnotmyname: sounds interesting!22:17
openstackgerritSalvatore Orlando proposed a change to openstack-infra/elastic-recheck: Delete fingerprint for 1224001  https://review.openstack.org/9427622:17
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-infra22:18
clarkbnotmyname: is that what you had in mind?22:18
notmynameclarkb: I'm not sure.22:18
clarkbnotmyname: I can push a patch really quick to infra/config to give us a basis for the discussion22:19
notmynameclarkb: I was thinking of a column that would have eg "Clark Boylan" listed. not that "there exists a core sponsor"22:19
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/storyboard: Fix a migration file name  https://review.openstack.org/9354522:19
notmynameclarkb: but ya, i think that would be helpful to see22:19
clarkbnotmyname: so gerrit labels have numeric values assigned by humans22:20
jeblairkrotscheck, NikitaKonovalov: does storyboard actually support an xml api?  the docs have examples for it, but i hope that's just an accidental copy from openstack.22:20
notmynameclarkb: ah, ok. heh, I guess I could be "reviewer 23" and then sort by values looking for things assigned to number "23" ;-)22:20
notmynameclarkb: but that sounds like a terrible idea22:20
clarkbwell they aren't arbitrary either. its just like your normal code reviews22:21
clarkbso it would say Clark Boylan +122:22
lifelessmordred_: clarkb: ping22:22
lifeless(pbr)22:22
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/storyboard: Minor fixes to docs page  https://review.openstack.org/9390922:22
jeblairnotmyname: and i believe that's searchable now (i think you can search for changes where you have left a vote of a certain value in a particular category; so you could search for changes where you are the core sponsor)22:23
notmynameclarkb: ok, I think you've lost me now :-)22:23
jeblairclarkb: i think a picture is worth 1k words here22:23
notmynamejeblair: clarkb +122:24
notmynameor +1000 as the case may be22:24
jeblairkrotscheck: ttx has a question on 9119622:25
openstackgerritClark Boylan proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add swift sponsors review column  https://review.openstack.org/9427722:25
clarkbjeblair: probably22:25
clarkbanyways I think that will do the actual config change22:26
openstackgerritMichael Krotscheck proposed a change to openstack-infra/storyboard: Added priorities to tasks  https://review.openstack.org/9167522:26
krotscheckjeblair: Checking22:26
notmynameclarkb: is there a way to see what that looks like (the result of that config change)?22:26
jeblairnotmyname: http://paste.openstack.org/show/80961/22:27
jeblairnotmyname: that's a quick mockup of the review table22:27
jeblairclarkb: ^22:27
clarkbjeblair beat me to it22:27
jeblairclarkb: copied from my current review in gertty ;)22:28
zaroaconrad: yeah ok, new jjb release tomorrow.22:28
notmynamejeblair: clarkb: ah, ok. so that's in the table that is in the patch itself. is that able to be reflected in the general reviews page?22:29
clarkbnotmyname: yes it will show up in the list of reviews page too22:30
*** james_li has quit IRC22:30
notmynamejeblair: clarkb: eg on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/swift,n,z the top one is from tom22:30
clarkbnotmyname: how it shows up there depends on how you have your gerrit settings set22:30
clarkbI will only see it say +1 under sponsors if there is a sponsor. sdague will see notmyname +122:30
notmynameclarkb: I was imagining another column next to tom's name that eg has mine, if I'm the core sponsor there22:30
notmynameok22:30
*** dims has quit IRC22:30
clarkbthat is a user configurable option22:30
*** smarcet has quit IRC22:30
clarkbat https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/preferences22:31
*** aconrad has quit IRC22:31
clarkb"Display Person Name in Review Category"22:31
notmynameclarkb: ah, ok!22:31
notmynameclarkb: with that system, can I (ie ptl) assign people to that?22:33
zarowow! took me all day to get gearman-java working again.22:33
clarkbnotmyname: no, individuals must do it themselves22:33
notmynameclarkb: ok22:34
*** mrodden has quit IRC22:35
jerryzclarkb: will publishing a draft trigger check pipeline?22:35
clarkbjerryz: no22:35
clarkbalso please don't use drafts22:35
sdaguenotmyname: what about just actually adding reviewers to reviews?22:36
jerryzclarkb: may i ask why?22:36
clarkbjerryz: because they are a broken feature in gerrit and we can't disable them22:36
*** briancurtin has left #openstack-infra22:37
*** aconrad has joined #openstack-infra22:37
jeblairclarkb, zaro: did changing acls for drafts not work?22:37
clarkbjerryz: if you depend on a change with a current draft patchset it breaks the child change, if you push a draft patchset atop published patchsets it confuses reviewers, and so n22:37
clarkbjeblair: correct. drafts super special and ignore acls apparently. This is fixed in 2.922:37
clarkbjerryz: and you don't gain anything from drafts. It is better to use work in progress22:38
*** thedodd has quit IRC22:38
bknudsonfor some reason gerrit table view doesn't show +1 V for a change, even though if you look at the change Jenkins has +1.22:38
clarkbjerryz: specifically they aren't secure though some people think they are and use them that way22:38
clarkbbknudson: link?22:38
bknudsonclarkb: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/keystone+status:open+owner:blk-u,n,z22:38
*** jgrimm has quit IRC22:38
bknudsonthe top one22:39
*** ptippett[A] has quit IRC22:39
clarkbbknudson: is there a draft patchset?22:39
zaroclarkb: drafts ignore acls?22:39
clarkbzaro: enough to make acls disabling drafts not work22:39
bknudsonclarkb: no, I never had to do a draft for that one.22:39
zaronews to me.22:39
clarkbbknudson: nevermind I can vote a value so I don't think so22:39
clarkbzaro: uh you tested this and _david_ fixed it iirc22:40
bknudsonnot a huge deal but just interesting.22:40
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek22:40
openstackgerritBen Nemec proposed a change to openstack-infra/config: Add dib-utils project  https://review.openstack.org/9028122:40
sdagueso I'd be curious how wrong I managed to get this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94260/22:40
sdaguejeepyb is kind of dark magic to me, so I'm not convinced I got the invocations right22:41
clarkbsdague: first thing that jumps out at me is you are using refs/meta/dashboards/site22:41
clarkbsdague: any particular reason not to use the existing ref?22:41
notmynamesdague: because all reviewers, as currently listed, are seen as equal. the problem that needs to be solved is giving new and non-core contributors a contact point for question and someone who is shepherding the patch through the process of submission->master22:42
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra22:42
*** james_li has joined #openstack-infra22:43
*** hipster_ has joined #openstack-infra22:44
notmynamealso, having social pressure on core reviewers to stay more active :-)22:44
jeblairkrotscheck: what's the process to run a local webclient and point it at the prod server?  http://ci.openstack.org/storyboard/install/development.html doesn't seem to cover that case22:46
sdagueclarkb: dashboards end up being grouped by files under a branch. site seemed a reasonable branch to start with for the generic approach of this, as this will also let projects define dashboards.22:46
zarojeblair, clarkb : disabled drafts is fixed in 2.822:46
sdagueI'm happy to change it to something else22:47
*** hipster has quit IRC22:47
clarkbzaro: I thought it was 2.9?22:47
krotscheckjeblair: tox -egrunt server:prod22:47
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC22:47
clarkbsdague: reviewed22:47
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:47
sdagueclarkb: thanks!22:47
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra22:47
zarojeblair, clarkb :https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/54062/22:47
clarkbsdague: no the name is fine was just curious if there was a reason22:47
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-infra22:47
clarkboh nice it was backported22:48
zaroclarkb: was pushed to 2.9, but got moved to 2.822:48
clarkbzaro: so we should probably update All-Projects config to block drafts for registered users22:48
clarkbI am guessing that will need testing and an announcement to the list so I won't go ahead and just do it22:48
clarkbbut I will update All-Projects on review-dev really quick22:49
*** hipster_ has quit IRC22:49
zaromight need to update gerrit though, not sure if this made it to version we have.22:49
* zaro checks now22:49
*** aconrad has quit IRC22:49
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-infra22:50
clarkbugh review-dev is using a different version that review.o.o22:50
nibalizer:(22:51
*** whoops has quit IRC22:52
*** hipster has quit IRC22:52
zaroclarkb: yeah, what's up with that?22:52
clarkbdon't look at me22:52
*** gokrokve has quit IRC22:52
clarkbI was conveniently out that week ;)22:52
clarkbI am guessing the war for each is different in puppet22:53
zaronoticed that review-dev is no longer reporting to puppetboard22:53
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:53
zaroclarkb: should be the smae22:53
openstackgerritMichael Krotscheck proposed a change to openstack-infra/storyboard: Updated documentation to include instructions for prod-proxy mode.  https://review.openstack.org/9427922:53
krotscheckjeblair: ^22:53
krotscheck(Although I have _no_ idea why there’s a big scary red bar in the diff)22:54
pleia2clarkb: continuing on the reviewday thing, any idea why would setup.py + README.md be causing issues now? something in infra changed?22:54
clarkbcompare https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/manifests/review.pp#n110 to https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/manifests/review_dev.pp#n4522:54
clarkbzaro: ^22:54
jeblairkrotscheck: mixed tab/spaces22:54
clarkbin any case I added the rule to review-dev22:54
clarkbabout to test it22:54
clarkbpleia2: possibly something in pip changed22:55
jeblairkrotscheck: we're generally all-spaces around here, so at some point we should s/^I/    / in the docs22:55
jeblairkrotscheck: grount_no_api or grunt?22:55
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-infra22:55
krotscheckgrunt_no_api22:55
pleia2clarkb: aha, I'll investigate22:55
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-infra22:56
zaroclarkb: argg!22:57
clarkb! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/drafts/master/5261 (cannot upload drafts)22:58
openstackclarkb: Error: "remote" is not a valid command.22:58
*** melwitt has quit IRC22:59
clarkbzaro: jeblair ^ so I think that worked as expected22:59
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-infra22:59
*** msabramo has quit IRC22:59
clarkbI added refs/drafts/*\npush= block Registered Users22:59
clarkbto All-Projects' config22:59
jeblairkrotscheck: when i test 91196 locally, clicking on the project page just shows the 'welcome to storyboard' overview page22:59
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC22:59
clarkblifeless: ok pong23:00
krotscheckjeblair: Sec, let me get this whitespace fix done and I’ll see what’s going on there.23:00
openstackgerritMichael Krotscheck proposed a change to openstack-infra/storyboard: Removed tabs, changed to four spaces.  https://review.openstack.org/9428023:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:02
*** lcostantino has quit IRC23:02
*** james_li has quit IRC23:02
lifelessclarkb: hi :)23:02
*** aconrad has joined #openstack-infra23:02
clarkbbut now I get a databases error trying to push non draft changes23:03
clarkbso it may have broken everything :)23:03
clarkbhopefully this is just review-dev being cranky23:03
*** r-daneel has quit IRC23:03
zaroclarkb: ohh cool!23:03
*** igor_ has quit IRC23:03
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-infra23:04
*** virmitio has quit IRC23:04
*** kaisero has quit IRC23:04
zarorcarrillocruz: we will be turning off drafts soon23:04
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz23:04
*** sweston has quit IRC23:05
clarkbzaro: well assuming we can get review-dev to work23:05
openstackgerritMichael Krotscheck proposed a change to openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Some project ui/ux updates  https://review.openstack.org/9119623:05
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek23:05
zaroclarkb: you mean the puppet part?23:05
krotscheckjeblair: Give that a shot.23:05
*** msabramo has joined #openstack-infra23:05
clarkbzaro: no I mean the I can't push anything to review-dev right now part23:06
*** r-daneel has quit IRC23:07
zaroclarkb: did you set "read = blck group Anonymous Users" and "push = block group Anonymous Users" ?23:07
clarkbno just push = block group Registered Users23:08
zaroclarkb: section should be [access "refs/drafts/*"]23:08
clarkbWe don't want to restrict Anonymous users as that is a noop23:08
zaroclarkb: yep, makes sense23:08
clarkbsee https://review-dev.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/All-Projects,access23:08
jeblairkrotscheck: lgtm; one more thing -- is there a trick to logging in when using server:prod?23:09
krotscheckjeblair: Yeah, when you come back to localhost you have to change the protocol from https to http.23:10
lifelessclarkb: did you see my pbr query ~ 24 hr ago ?23:10
krotscheckManually.23:10
clarkblifeless: briefly. I didn't really parse it at the time23:10
lifelessclarkb: ok; care to re-read?23:10
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-infra23:11
clarkbsure /me hunts through scrollback23:11
zaroclarkb: looks correct to me.23:11
clarkblifeless: is it not possible to use one untagged version and only use that format?23:12
clarkblifeless: eg alpha vs dev?23:12
lifelessthat is the question ?23:12
clarkbI think what confuses me is alpha vs dev is only ever specified by pbr not humans right? so why are we worried about it?23:13
clarkbalso semver.rst should diaf23:13
jeblairkrotscheck: thx23:13
lifelesshumans specify alpha/beta etc today23:13
*** ramashri has quit IRC23:14
lifelessuntagged is always *dev*23:14
zaroclarkb: what registered user account are you using to test draft with?23:14
clarkbzaro: cboylan23:14
zaroclarkb: aren't you an admin?23:14
clarkbzaro: I am23:14
zaroclarkb: so you shouldn't be blocked from publishing anything.23:15
clarkbzaro: thats not true23:15
clarkbzaro: Admins don't have super powers23:15
clarkbthey only have the ability to get super powers23:15
*** wenlock has quit IRC23:16
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Added task priority to edit and display of tasks  https://review.openstack.org/9169323:16
clarkblifeless: order is dev < a < b < rc23:16
clarkblifeless: according to semver.rst23:16
clarkblifeless: I think I am still failing to parse your question in a meaningful way23:16
lifelessclarkb: yes, and a.dev isn't permitted according to it23:16
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox23:17
lifelessclarkb: but this means that a .dev version 5 commits after an alpha tag has a lower precedence than the alpha tag that came before it23:17
clarkbzaro: and I want it to prevent me from pushing drafts which it seems to do23:17
clarkblifeless: is that a problem?23:18
lifelessclarkb: I don't know pbr's use cases as well as mordred_ or I presume you23:19
lifelessclarkb: so it certainly seemed like it could be a problem23:19
clarkblifeless: so the thing that enforces that isn't pbr iirc. It is pip23:19
zaroclarkb: i just tried to push to a change to HEAD:refs/drafts gerrit didn't complain.  but i also don't see it on review-dev either.23:19
*** sarob has joined #openstack-infra23:19
clarkbzaro: do you have super powers?23:19
jeblairkrotscheck: someone left a technical comment that i think only you can respond to on 9263923:20
zaroclarkb: ohh wait, if i do HEAD:refs/drafts/master then it says i can't do that.23:20
krotscheckjeblair: Yeah, that’s MaxV. He and I had a really good time discussing various merits of JS tooling vis-a-vis horizon at the summit.23:20
clarkbzaro: oh right because the ruele is refs/drafts/*23:20
clarkbzaro: are you able to push a normal change/patchset?23:21
clarkbzaro: because that is currently very broken for me23:21
* zaro trying now23:21
clarkblifeless: I think this would be good to talk about with mordred to see if he actually intended on this gap23:21
zaroclarkb: just pushed this one, https://review-dev.openstack.org/#/c/5280/23:22
clarkblifeless: I don't think it is a huge issue but I am sure someone can get into a painful corner case if they try23:22
zaroclarkb: are you using git review?23:22
jogo_salv-orlando: sure, put up a patch to remove 122400123:22
clarkbzaro: yes23:22
zaroclarkb: i'm not23:22
clarkbzaro: why not?23:22
jeblairkrotscheck: ok, i wanted to make sure you didn't miss it, and especially didn't want you to accidentally ignore a potential new js reviewer.  would you like me to hold off on approving that change or go ahead and push it through?23:22
clarkbI can try it without too, but really git review is the way we tell people to use the thing23:22
*** jogo_ is now known as jogo23:23
zaroclarkb: don't know, but it seems to work with git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master23:23
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:23
krotscheckjeblair: Well, I’m composing a response right now which’ll give more context.23:23
jeblairkrotscheck: cool, i'll leave it for now then23:23
krotscheckkk23:23
clarkbzaro: both are working for me now23:24
clarkbzaro: so that may have just been the DB going away for a bit23:24
jeblairkrotscheck: (+2 crvw but not aprvd; feel free to aprv at will)23:24
krotscheckjeblair: tx23:24
zaroclarkb: yep, me too23:25
zaroclarkb: tested with git-review as well.23:25
clarkbzaro: cool, so I think that means this works as expected23:25
clarkbjeblair: zaro: do we want to make this change soonish? I can draft an announcement tomorrow23:26
*** ptippett[A] has joined #openstack-infra23:26
zaroclarkb: ok with me.23:26
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-infra23:27
jeblairclarkb: ++23:28
*** signed8bit has quit IRC23:30
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/storyboard-webclient: Switched new story modal to use typeahead project completion  https://review.openstack.org/9248723:31
pleia2clarkb: ok, I think I figured it out, it's unpacking /home/jenkins/workspace/gate-reviewday-pep8/.tox/dist/reviewday-0.2.0.zip into the /tmp/pip-blahblah directory but that doesn't include README.md that it's looking for, what is reviewday-0.2.0.zip anyway?23:31
pleia2the repo itself has README.md23:31
clarkbI think that is the sdist that it is building23:32
clarkbyou may need to add README.md to the setup.py as a data file23:32
pleia2alright, I'll give that a shot23:32
*** weshay has quit IRC23:36
praneshp_jeblair: clarkb any idea why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94286/ doesn’t merge?23:36
praneshp_it says cannot be automatically merged, I’m unsure what to change there23:36
clarkbpraneshp_: you cannot change your refs meta config that way23:37
praneshp_clarkb: ok, I just want to delete a tag, how should I go about doing it23:37
praneshp_i gave a really stupid name to my project’s furst tag, and want to nuke it.23:37
clarkbpraneshp_: we like to treat tags as permanent23:37
clarkbbecause they cannot be removed from downstream repos23:38
clarkbpraneshp_: fwiw all config changes should go through the openstack-infra/config repo23:38
praneshp_clarkb: hmm. I don’t have any downstream repos, not sure if anyone is using it formally yet23:38
praneshp_oh, I just folowd the gerrit UI, didn’t even make this commit directly23:38
clarkbpraneshp_: you have no way of knowing hence the rule23:38
praneshp_Hmm. any suggestions on how to help people not be confused by the  bad tag?23:39
clarkbzaro: huh is anyone allowed to hit the edit button on ACLs in gerrit?23:40
clarkbzaro: do you know if we can disable that too?23:41
lifelessclarkb: righto, it just leaves the patch set in limbo :)23:42
lifelessclarkb: when you see him point him at me :)23:42
clarkblifeless: when I see him? I am pretty sure he is off to do all the thing sthat don't involve IRC for the next month23:42
lifelesshe will pop in from time to time I'm sure23:43
clarkbjeblair: deleting a tag is just git push gerrit :refs/tags/5.19 right?23:44
clarkbI really don't like deleting tags though23:44
clarkbyay git for being broken in this way23:44
*** lcheng has quit IRC23:47
*** hipster has joined #openstack-infra23:47
morganfainbergclarkb, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89804/ seems to be a broken patchset, maybe somehow half draft half not? it has no changeset information returned from the gerrit query. http://pasteraw.com/kcrinap13oy7j6ond47ney7vz22ccbo which is breaking reviewday. I have a fix for reviewday proposed, but this looks... "odd"23:48
clarkbmorganfainberg: definitely was draft at one point. notice how patchset 6 is the first one23:49
clarkber patchset 523:49
*** msabramo has quit IRC23:49
zaroclarkb: apparently so.  not sure how to disabled that in acls settting23:49
morganfainbergclarkb, yeah it's super odd.23:49
*** hemna is now known as hemna_23:49
morganfainbergclarkb, and the webui returns very different info than the ssh gerrit query23:49
morganfainbergi think someone proposed a new draft to it23:49
*** paul--_ has joined #openstack-infra23:49
* morganfainberg thinks drafts are awful in gerrit 23:50
clarkbmorganfainberg: that may be but I think that prevents you from voting with a number when you review23:50
clarkbwhich I seem to be able to do23:50
pleia2morganfainberg: I think there is consensus on that here23:50
morganfainbergclarkb, yeah same, can vote w/ a number23:50
zaroclarkb: i think that edit button is a bug.23:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:51
clarkbzaro: it is doing it because it proposes it for review if you can't merge the changes23:52
*** hipster has quit IRC23:52
morganfainbergclarkb, don't think this breaks anything except reviewday... so possibly a minor bug in gerrit's --latest-changeset query argument23:52
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-infra23:53
clarkbmorganfainberg: yeah, I wonder if it is failing to get latest-changeset on any draft23:53
morganfainbergclarkb, i'll keep my eyes open for any other odd breakage, but it's probably nothing to worry about23:53
*** msabramo has joined #openstack-infra23:53
jeblairclarkb: yes23:53
clarkbjeblair: thoughts on deleting a tag in this particular case23:54
clarkbjeblair: I know in general we don't do it. And we only move tags when absolutely necessary23:54
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz23:54
praneshp_clarkb: thanks, I thought you forgot about it :)23:55
* ptippett[A] is now away - Reason : Auto-Away after 30 minutes23:56
clarkbptippett[A]: please disable your away notice23:56
jeblairthat's the second notice23:57
morganfainbergpraneshp_, clarkb doesn't forget things like that :)23:57
praneshp_morganfainberg: lol, correct :)23:58
morganfainbergpraneshp_, he was just waiting for a an answer to his question :)23:58
praneshp_i didnt have a chance to put a face on clarkb in the summit, saw morganfainberg23:58
morganfainbergpraneshp_, i had the same problem crossing paths w/ clarkb in hong kong -- come to paris, i'm sure you'll meet clarkb then!23:59
jeblairclarkb: i don't object as long as praneshp_ pinky swears he won't do it again ;)23:59
clarkbcool23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!