| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|out | 00:41 | |
| ianychoi[m] | fungi: I admit that I uploaded twice by seeing CIVS system message clearly like this: "Enter email addresses of voters, one per line. These may be new voters or existing voters who have not voted yet. In a private poll, giving the email address of an already existing voter will not let that voter vote twice. It will only resend the voter an invitation to vote. In a public poll, only a token attempt is made to prevent multiple | 17:20 |
|---|---|---|
| ianychoi[m] | voting." | 17:20 |
| ianychoi[m] | Would you help double-check the voter 1) whether it is really from the same election (e.g., TC vs. PTL) and 2) whether invitation code would be different or not? | 17:21 |
| fungi | yes, i've heard from multiple people now. civs sent them a duplicate copy of their ballot for the tc election, but it was just a duplicate not a totally new ballot, so they could still only vote once | 17:23 |
| fungi | it didn't send me a duplicate because by the time you reuploaded the rolls i had already voted, and civs knew there was no reason to send me another | 17:24 |
| fungi | so while it may be confusing for people, at least it doesn't compromise the polling result | 17:25 |
| ianychoi[m] | My concern was to see how many people would go through CIVS opt-in. When I first uploaded rolls from multiple pinging to me several hours before election starts, I saw a system message from CIVS that 337 electorates out of 395 did not opt-in | 17:27 |
| ianychoi[m] | So just around the election started, I re-uploaded the rolls but still there were 331 electorates who did not opt-in | 17:28 |
| fungi | yeah, i don't think readding people was a bad idea, it just resulted in sending duplicates to the people who had already opted in, and that led to some confusion for them | 17:28 |
| ianychoi[m] | Not sure whether announcing as fungi mentioned + reminder of CIVS opt-in is a good idea or not | 17:28 |
| ianychoi[m] | spotz knikolla jungleboyj: looking forward to listening to your thoughts on ^ discussion | 17:29 |
| fungi | if we decide to do reuploads like that again in the future, we should either only reupload the ones who weren't previously opted in (if civs gives us a log of the ones it did/didn't send), or let the ml know we're doing it and to possibly expect to receive duplicate ballots | 17:30 |
| ianychoi[m] | I agree with letting the ml know instead of managing the list who weren't previously opt-in by election officials | 17:31 |
| ianychoi[m] | (if we decide to do re-uploads considering less # of CIVS opt-in for the election) | 17:31 |
| spotz[m] | We can give people a heads up and let them know. Only TC I suspect got 2 emails not Ironic? | 18:40 |
| spotz[m] | Walking through Trinity College right now but can send when I get back to the hotel if no one has. Be about an hour | 18:42 |
| spotz[m] | Email sent | 21:59 |
| fungi | thanks! | 22:23 |
| ianychoi[m] | Thanks too | 22:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!