| opendevreview | Andrey Pavlov proposed openstack/election master: Add Andrey Pavlov candidacy for Ec2 API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/828279 | 11:07 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add release cycle info in sub line of template emails https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/828192 | 14:05 |
| *** Guest2040 is now known as spotz | 14:37 | |
| gmann | nomination kick off email sent | 14:57 |
| fungi | gmann: roughly 8.5 hours early. nominations don't open until 23:45 utc today according to the schedule | 15:20 |
| gmann | fungi: yeah, I think I mentioned 23.45 in email? | 15:21 |
| gmann | ohk, open now | 15:21 |
| gmann | even i saw early nomination even for ec2 | 15:21 |
| gmann | early nomination is all valid right? | 15:21 |
| fungi | yeah, probably, in the past we just didn't start accepting (processing) the nomination changes until the nominations start on the schedule | 15:22 |
| opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: TC Nomination - spotz https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/828361 | 15:26 |
| ianychoi[m] | gmann: CI will work after this time period we already set - https://opendev.org/openstack/election/src/branch/master/configuration.yaml#L11 | 15:27 |
| gmann | fungi: ack, thanks for catching it. | 15:27 |
| ianychoi[m] | just executing recheck after the time speified should be fine | 15:27 |
| gmann | ianychoi[m]: I see. | 15:27 |
| gmann | yeah, will do. | 15:27 |
| ianychoi[m] | Good :) | 16:07 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/election master: Adding Rajat Dhasmana candidacy for Cinder PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/828385 | 17:50 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/election master: Adding Rajat Dhasmana candidacy for Cinder PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/828385 | 18:05 |
| jungleboyj | gmann: So, Zuul on Rajat's candidacy passes. It looked like things were good. Do we need two +2's or should I merge now that I have looked at it? | 20:25 |
| gmann | jungleboyj: yeah, two +2. and we need to recheck after the 23:45. i sent nomination email little early. | 20:26 |
| gmann | jungleboyj: that time it will check the candidacy. | 20:26 |
| gmann | 3 hrs from now https://governance.openstack.org/election/ | 20:27 |
| fungi | right, at least theoretically, the election officials shouldn't be confirming nominations until the start of the nominations window actually opens (if you look at the election page it has a countdown) | 20:27 |
| jungleboyj | Oh, ok. I saw it said that there was no election in progress. :-) Surprised it still passed. | 20:27 |
| gmann | jungleboyj: you can +2 anyways and we will recheck and then I can +A. | 20:27 |
| gmann | jungleboyj: yeah it will just skip the candidacy checks until nomination start | 20:27 |
| gmann | but job will pass | 20:27 |
| jungleboyj | Ok. I have my +2 on there as I know he is a valid candidate. :-) | 20:28 |
| gmann | yeah | 20:28 |
| * jungleboyj is learning new things | 20:28 | |
| gmann | and for other candidates also we will go with two +2 for merging. | 20:28 |
| jungleboyj | Ok. Sounds good. Good to have multiple eyes on them. :-) | 20:30 |
| gmann | yeah | 20:30 |
| fungi | if it becomes necessary, it's sufficient for one election official to confirm a nominee is a valid candidate, but having two do it is preferable | 20:33 |
| fungi | especially since there are more officials this time | 20:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!