Monday, 2015-05-11

*** openstack has joined #openstack-defcore14:19
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore15:03
*** clee has joined #openstack-defcore15:22
egluteif everyone is ok with this one, i will merge it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181280/ zehicle hogepodge markvoelker mordred15:36
mordredlooking15:37
mordredeglute: I could quibble with the commit message, as I'd actualy like to argue that we should take the position that those changes are not valid ... HOWEVER - I think I've beaten that horse and we can come back to it next go round :)15:38
eglutemordred if you only disagree with the commit message, then i think it is ok. we will bring back all the horses during the summit working sessions and figure out a better process. will you be able to attend Wed. working sessions during the summit?15:39
mordredeglute: I'll certanly endeavor to ...15:40
egluteexcellent15:40
eglutei will send out calendar invites to the defcore mailing list, hopefully that will help with the attendance of the sessions15:41
*** markvoelker has quit IRC15:45
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-defcore16:02
galstromhogepodge: on 2015.next components should include identity .. and the identity-admin capability should be under identity not compute.. dont you think?16:39
galstromhogepodge: seems odd that identity-auth is under compute16:40
hogepodgegalstrom: component indicates a product category, like compute or storage. It's not really a product category. afaik. Is that right zehicle?16:41
galstromok.. that makes sense16:42
openstackgerritMerged openstack/defcore: Fix hyperlink markup  https://review.openstack.org/18177816:57
eglutesince this received lots of feedback, i am going to merge it. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181280/ unless anyone else has more comments16:58
*** VanL has joined #openstack-defcore17:36
notmynamedone. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181659/18:15
eglutethank you notmyname!! hogepodge zehicle what is your opinion?18:16
hogepodgeeglute: notmyname reviewed18:20
egluteright,18:21
eglutethanks hogepodge!!!18:21
*** VanL has quit IRC18:22
*** catherineD2 has quit IRC18:25
*** galstrom has quit IRC18:26
notmynamehogepodge: technically, I support reviewing them later. I'm not 100% sure if they are to be completely dropped :-)18:26
notmynamebut it's ok (otherwise I wouldn't have added a +1)18:26
*** clee has quit IRC18:26
*** galstrom_ has joined #openstack-defcore18:27
*** catherineD2 has joined #openstack-defcore18:27
*** clee has joined #openstack-defcore18:27
*** clee has quit IRC18:27
*** clee has joined #openstack-defcore18:27
hogepodgenotmyname: we can flag and add an action18:28
*** galstrom_ is now known as galstrom18:33
*** VanL has joined #openstack-defcore18:41
hogepodgeeglute: zehicle what should I do with that patch that was rolled back yesterday? Resubmit?18:43
egluteyes please18:43
hogepodgeI'll be sure to mark as wip this time18:43
eglute:)18:46
*** catherineD2 has quit IRC18:46
VanLhogepodge, eglute, zehicle: The link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/defcore/tree/2015.05.json doesn't work19:22
VanLIs that the new format, or the 1.2 format?19:23
hogepodgeVanL:  should it be http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/defcore/tree/2015.04.json ?19:23
VanLThe link is copied from the board report19:23
hogepodgeOr if 05 is what we're targeting, but it isn't approved it, it won't work.19:24
VanLThe board report has the link above as the proposed 2015.05 for approval19:24
VanLbut clicking the link doesn't show the file19:24
VanLSo I can't see which version it is.19:24
VanLFor example, 2015.next.json is http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/defcore/diff/?id=5aad0eccf1d93e5403995e137698c46f5724707a&context=40&ignorews=0&ss=119:27
VanLWhich is schema version 1.219:27
VanLIIRC, you were going to update your patch to the schema version 2.0 2015.next.json that I provided the other day19:28
VanLBut I can't see that reflected in the tree (yet)19:28
VanLAnd the capabilities list is the wrong list, it doesn't reflect the new capabilities19:28
VanL(This is all referring to the Board Report May 2015 shared by zehicle)19:31
hogepodgeVanL, no, not yet, I was mistaken on doing that update. I'll get it in today.19:40
hogepodgeUnderstant19:41
openstackgerritDaryl Walleck proposed openstack/defcore: Flagging missed stop test  https://review.openstack.org/18204019:42
cleehaving some issues trying to run tempest with the 2015.04 required tests19:48
cleeanybody got a minute to try to help me figure out if I'm even doing this right?19:48
cleeI'm running: testr run --load-list=../defcore-2015.04-required.txt19:48
cleefrom inside the .tempest folder from a refstack-client checkout19:49
hogepodgeclee: sure19:50
cleeI grabbed a copy of https://github.com/openstack/defcore/blob/master/2015.04/2015.04.required.txt and dropped it into the parent folder.19:50
cleeso I'm pretty sure it's loading the right list of tests19:50
cleebut I'm getting this when it runs:19:50
cleeDetails: {"forbidden": {"message": "Quota exceeded for cores,instances,ram: Requested 1, but already used 2 of 2 cores", "code": 403}}19:50
cleethe users configured in the tempest.conf file are all clear, no quota used, and the quota is definitely not set to 2 cores max19:51
cleefull output: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/62cfc10e82d777e932f719:53
cleeokay, I think it was the tenant isolation feature that was causing that error20:04
cleebut now I have a fun new problem:20:04
cleerunning that same 'testr run --load-list=../defcore-2015.04-required.txt' command now shows that it's only running two tests.20:05
hogepodgeclee: That's definitely a dependencies problem20:05
cleetest_list_servers_detailed_filter_by_image and test_list_servers_filter_by_image20:05
hogepodgeclee: Download and install a new tempest and reinstall the dependencies20:06
hogepodgeOthers have runinto the same thing20:06
cleehogepodge: I'm using tags/4 - should I be using something else?20:06
cleeokay, I'll make a new checkout and try again.20:06
hogepodgeclee: tags/4 should be fine.20:06
hogepodgeclee: I also make sure I install both requirements.txt and test-requirements.txt into the venv20:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/defcore: Flag test that makes assumption about image creation  https://review.openstack.org/18128020:10
cleehogepodge: yup. I did 'pip install -r requirements.txt', 'pip install -r test-requirements.txt', and 'pip install -e .' from the tempest dir.20:10
hogepodgeclee: I've never done pip install -e20:11
cleestill only running those same two tests.20:11
openstackgerritMerged openstack/defcore: Request to flag test_get_object_after_expiry_time due to Tempest bug  https://review.openstack.org/18116420:12
* clee tries again without the 'pip install -e .'20:12
openstackgerritDaryl Walleck proposed openstack/defcore: Request to flag Swift tests related to authentication and access  https://review.openstack.org/18165920:27
eglutehogepodge zehicle ^^ Daryl fixed merge conflict, let me know if it is ready to merge. I really want to merge all the flagged tests that have approvals :)20:28
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-defcore20:43
*** VanL has quit IRC21:27
openstackgerritMerged openstack/defcore: Request to flag Swift tests related to authentication and access  https://review.openstack.org/18165922:20
openstackgerritChris Hoge proposed openstack/defcore: Update flagging process to include metadata and bug fixes  https://review.openstack.org/18210522:24
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!