Tuesday, 2015-08-11

*** _cjones_ has quit IRC00:04
*** thorst has quit IRC00:25
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:47
*** ankita_w_ has quit IRC00:51
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:54
*** nadya has quit IRC00:59
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC01:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/21085701:16
*** fabian1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:22
*** jwcropp__ has quit IRC01:23
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer: Drop the downgrade function of migration scripts  https://review.openstack.org/21137901:26
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:27
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC01:28
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:35
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/21091701:38
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:41
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC01:41
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:42
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC01:43
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:43
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC01:46
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add Kilo release note reference  https://review.openstack.org/21139101:47
*** jdandrea has quit IRC02:00
*** ankita_w_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:08
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC02:12
openstackgerritRohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Adds support for dynamic event pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/20806802:12
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:22
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:25
*** haigang has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:43
*** ddieterl_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:45
*** ddieterly has quit IRC02:48
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:55
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer: Drop the downgrade function of migration scripts  https://review.openstack.org/21137902:57
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:57
*** ddieterl_ has quit IRC02:58
*** nadya has quit IRC02:59
*** ankita_w_ has quit IRC03:01
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC03:05
*** david-lyle has quit IRC03:21
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:22
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:24
*** rbak has quit IRC03:26
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:29
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer: Introduce Guru Meditation Reports into Ceilometer  https://review.openstack.org/19636903:39
*** logan2 has quit IRC03:47
*** hhuang has quit IRC03:54
*** jkraj has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:54
*** logan2 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:55
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC03:57
*** Ephur has quit IRC04:12
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:15
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC04:21
*** fabian1 has left #openstack-ceilometer04:32
*** fabian1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:36
*** jkraj has quit IRC04:38
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:39
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:40
*** ildikov has quit IRC04:46
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:58
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC04:58
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:59
*** jkraj has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:07
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:16
*** ddieterly has quit IRC05:21
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:22
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:24
*** yprokule has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:24
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC05:24
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:27
*** nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:30
*** nadya has quit IRC05:30
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:31
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC05:31
*** nadya_ has quit IRC05:32
*** liusheng has quit IRC05:34
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:43
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:17
*** ddieterly has quit IRC06:21
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:24
*** rohit has quit IRC06:30
*** jkraj has quit IRC06:36
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:37
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:44
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:56
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:02
*** shardy has quit IRC07:06
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC07:12
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:13
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:18
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC07:20
*** ddieterly has quit IRC07:22
*** jkraj has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:22
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:33
*** nadya has quit IRC07:38
*** cdent has quit IRC08:03
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:05
*** boris-42 has quit IRC08:10
*** links has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:13
*** yassine__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:16
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:19
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Improve Nova Instance metering  https://review.openstack.org/20979908:25
*** fawadk has quit IRC08:25
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:26
openstackgerritIldiko Vancsa proposed openstack/aodh: Move ceilometerclient mock to evaluator/base  https://review.openstack.org/21145908:26
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:30
*** dikonoor has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:49
*** dikonoo has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:49
*** yassine__ has quit IRC09:01
*** yassine__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer-specs: highly distributed coordinated notifications  https://review.openstack.org/19933109:07
*** yassine__ has quit IRC09:09
openstackgerritZhai, Edwin proposed openstack/aodh: Fix aodh-dbsync crash  https://review.openstack.org/21147109:12
*** yassine__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: Add Kilo release note reference  https://review.openstack.org/21139109:15
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:20
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: initialise opencontrail client in tests  https://review.openstack.org/21133509:20
*** ddieterly has quit IRC09:24
*** nadya has quit IRC09:31
openstackgerritMerged openstack/aodh: Move ceilometerclient mock to evaluator/base  https://review.openstack.org/21145909:31
openstackgerritChris Dent proposed openstack/aodh: Refactor api tests for alarm history  https://review.openstack.org/21083209:35
openstackgerritChris Dent proposed openstack/aodh: Fixes querying alarm history with severity field  https://review.openstack.org/20031509:36
openstackgerritIldiko Vancsa proposed openstack/aodh: Move import to local to resolve circular dependency failure  https://review.openstack.org/21081609:36
cdentildikov: if you're around can you have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210503/09:38
cdentplease and thank you!09:38
ildikovcdent: done09:40
cdentthanks09:40
ildikovcdent: can you push this one through: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210816/1 ?09:41
* cdent looks09:41
cdentyup, there it goes09:41
ildikovcdent: I rebased it so the W +1 disappeared09:41
ildikovcdent: tnx :)09:41
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/aodh: Refactor api tests for alarm history  https://review.openstack.org/21083209:50
*** nadya has quit IRC09:51
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:52
jd__Gnocchi 1.1.0 is out09:53
cdent\o/09:53
openstackgerritMerged openstack/aodh: Move import to local to resolve circular dependency failure  https://review.openstack.org/21081609:55
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:20
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC10:22
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:22
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: Revert "Revert "remove instance:<flavor> meter""  https://review.openstack.org/19250310:22
*** ddieterly has quit IRC10:25
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Stop registering oslo.messaging option  https://review.openstack.org/21102510:26
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC10:42
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Control Events RBAC from policy.json  https://review.openstack.org/21149410:43
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Control Events RBAC from policy.json  https://review.openstack.org/21149410:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: Correct thread handling in TranslationHook  https://review.openstack.org/21050310:54
*** yassine__ has quit IRC11:00
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add user_id,project_id traits to audit events  https://review.openstack.org/21150911:17
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: Add to influx command's $PATH  https://review.openstack.org/20956111:18
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: InfluxDB storage driver  https://review.openstack.org/16540711:18
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:21
*** ddieterly has quit IRC11:26
*** dikonoor has quit IRC11:31
*** yassine__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:35
*** belmoreira has quit IRC11:35
*** thorst1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:36
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:38
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:39
dikonoogordc:Hi gordc11:40
dikonoogordc: I am looking at the possibility of adding user_id and project_id traits to all the event_types at https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml11:41
dikonoogordc: The image event_types have user_id and project_id but I am not really sure if they actually point to the ids11:42
dikonoohttps://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml#L101-L11211:42
dikonoogordc:There are few other traits defined here which are also related to user_id and project_id https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml#L119-L12411:43
gordcdikonoo: point to which ids?11:43
dikonoogordc: the ids should point to whatever is in the token11:44
gordcdikonoo: they should be. they are the same ids we use when we built them as meters.11:45
gordcthe crud events are mostly just existing meters i shifted over.11:45
dikonoogordc: ok..https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml#L102 So you are saying that this actually points to something like11:46
dikonoo         {11:46
dikonoo            "type":"string",11:46
dikonoo            "name":"project_id",11:46
dikonoo            "value":"20a3720a680240f2acbfde969d91c37d"11:46
dikonoo         }11:46
dikonoogordc: as in they do point to the project_id and not to anything else11:47
*** liusheng has quit IRC11:49
dikonoogordc : In https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/events-rbac.rst , we have mentioned that there could be cases where certain event_types don't have project_id and user_id as traits , in which case we will return events that doesn't have this trait11:50
dikonooexact lines from the spec are these :11:50
dikonooUntil all events have project/user information, events which lack this data will be returned along with events corresponding to the token’s project, if the token's user is an admin on that project11:50
gordcdikonoo: should be... let me cehck11:50
gordcdikonoo: right.11:50
dikonoogordc: I couldn;t figure out a way that could be used in the events filter that says - give me all the events that doesn't have traits abc11:51
dikonoogordc: I can run a filter that says - "give me events where the project_id='abc'"11:51
dikonoogordc: but is it possible to run a filter that says - "give me events that doesn't have this trait"11:52
gordcdikonoo: i'm not sure there's an exists query capability... we might need to add that in11:52
dikonoogordc: In the current events definition yaml file , most of the event_types have user_id and project_id defined as traits.. I have added a review for audit events..There's a even type related to dns that doesn;t have these and I don;t have any clue on where that comes from11:54
dikonoogordc:https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml#L369-L39911:55
dikonoogordc: Do you have any idea on these?11:56
gordcdikonoo: yeah, i think let me find the patch.11:56
gordcthose are designate events11:57
gordchttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/186962/11:57
dikonoohttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/18696211:58
dikonoook11:58
dikonoogordc:not sure where to find rohit :)12:00
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:02
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:02
dikonoogordc: Do you think adding this trait to all event types and setting it to null by default (for temporary purposes till all events set user/project) makes sense?12:02
gordcdikonoo: what does that achieve?12:04
gordcdikonoo: regarding the glance_crud snippet from above, project_id is correct. i don't know why user_id is set to payload.owner as well, that seems to be wrong.12:04
gordcbut i'm not sure... i'm just looking at test payload12:04
dikonoogordc: that way we can use the existing filter logic to query for all events that has trait project_id set to null12:05
dikonoogordc: that way we take care of returning events that don't have user/project set (this will be returned for admins only) along with the events that have project_id set to the user's request project_id12:06
gordcdikonoo: i see.. i think you'll still need to support OR condition...so you can grab all events with an id OR null12:06
gordcunless you're doing two queries12:06
gordcyour query would be completely out of whack because of limits though12:07
dikonoogordc: If I do two queries, I will get beaten by the community at review state saying it's a performance overhead..but do you think 2 queries will cause that much perf overhead12:07
dikonoogordc: *review stage12:08
gordcdikonoo: it will be very complicated to do two queries and still enforce the limit12:08
dikonoogordc: hmm..thats right12:08
dikonoogordc: which is easier..investing my time on implementing OR condition in the query..or adding user_id, project_id to all events12:09
dikonoogordc: All events should have project_id (there could be events without user_id)..12:09
gordci think you'll still need to have OR no matter what.12:09
gordcyou'll need to grab all events=xyz OR null (not exist)12:10
gordci'm looking to see if there's existing code we can grab to do this.12:11
dikonoogordc: I haven't looked into how to implement that but my guess is each of the db driver needs a separate/custom implementation12:11
dikonoogordc: yeah..Please help :)12:11
gordcdikonoo: i think one good thing is that we don't have to surface the OR functionality so it actually might not be that bad.12:12
gordccan you tell when it's an 'admin' query vs a common user query?12:12
dikonoogordc: yeah..we use the 'context_is_admin' rule from policy.json to check that12:13
dikonoogordc: if that rule passes, that means the user making the call is an admin12:14
gordcdikonoo: so in your patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/2/ceilometer/api/controllers/v2/events.py12:15
gordcwhen it gets past rbac.enforce12:15
gordchow do i know if it's a user request or an admin request?12:16
gordcassuming we accept both12:16
dikonoogordc: gordc: we use this method https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/api/rbac.py#L6312:17
dikonoogordc: this in turn checks for the rule 'context_is_admin'12:17
dikonoogordc: If the call is made by an admin , this method will return None,None12:18
dikonoogordc: This method is used in many other places in the ceilometer code to check if the call is made by an admin12:19
dikonoogordc: like here >> https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/api/controllers/v2/utils.py#L34112:19
gordcah got it.12:19
gordcyeah, i guess you can figure out if user, query on that user id.12:20
gordcif admin, query on the project_id (and then just append an or conditions to query on events project_id not exists12:21
gordci can probably help you with each of the backends... you should be able to just do it for sql first since that's what we gate on.. the other backends i can help address12:22
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:22
dikonoogordc: ok..so there's no escape12:24
dikonoogordc:do you know if there's some existing ceilometer tests around rbac that I can update for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/12:25
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:25
gordcyeah. i think there's only 'append OR condition' or 'do two queries'... and two queries is going to be a bad time for everyone.12:25
gordcdikonoo: i don't believe there are12:26
*** ddieterly has quit IRC12:27
gordcdikonoo: seems like it's hardcoded into assume admin: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenarios.py#L2612:27
dikonoogordc: perhaps i can add something where the role defined in the policy.json corresponds to something else and that should give a 40312:30
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:30
dikonoogordc: does this need a documentation change >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/12:31
dikonoogordc: which document should I change?12:31
gordcyou can just add DocImpact to your commit message12:33
gordcdikonoo: i don't think we have it stated anywhere that events require admin right now12:33
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:33
dikonoogordc: so doc chane not required..I have the new rules at policy.json.sample12:34
dikonoogordc:change*12:34
dikonoogordc: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211509/. could you take a look at this when you get a chance12:35
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:35
*** haigang has quit IRC12:35
gordcdikonoo: hmm.. that's weird there's listing for both objectstore.http.request and *http.*12:37
gordci'm pretty sure it's never matching against objectstore.http.request since *http.* will catch it12:38
dikonoogordc: so the entries added against objectstore* are not required12:42
gordcprobably not. that can be done separately. i need to confirm that12:42
dikonoook12:43
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: support multiple-meter payloads  https://review.openstack.org/21051212:45
*** thumpba has quit IRC12:45
*** links has quit IRC12:48
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: start rpc deprecation  https://review.openstack.org/21130412:50
*** kfarhane_ has quit IRC12:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC12:50
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC12:51
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:52
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC12:53
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:56
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:59
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC13:01
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add user_id,project_id traits to audit events  https://review.openstack.org/21150913:06
*** vgnbkr has quit IRC13:20
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC13:20
*** vgnbkr has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:22
dikonooliusheng: Hi liusheng.13:26
dikonooliusheng: this is about a comment you had added in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ on UT13:27
dikonooliusheng: I don't see a UT framework or existing testcases in place in ceilometer to UT the rules I have added.. Do you see a way?13:27
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:29
dikonooliusheng:I checked out https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/tests/functional/gabbi/fixtures.py#L67 but that seems to be using the the policy.json at /etc/ceilometer13:29
dikonooliusheng: Do you have any suggestions on how we can add a UT?13:31
*** david-lyle has quit IRC13:36
dikonoogordc: I have uploaded another patch for  https://review.openstack.org/211509 , removing the entries for objectstore13:36
dikonoogordc: and for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211494/ , I don't see a place I can add some UTs for the change I made :-|13:37
*** jasonamyers has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:46
* cdent waves at jasonamyers 13:49
jasonamyershey cdent13:49
*** edmondsw has quit IRC13:51
*** yprokule has quit IRC13:53
*** yprokule has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:55
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC13:55
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:56
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:56
*** afazekas has quit IRC13:56
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:00
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:01
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC14:17
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:18
gordcdikonoo: you'll probably want to edit this: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/tests/functional/api/v2/test_event_scenarios.py14:23
gordcbut pass in different headers14:23
cdentgordc: you got anybody who can do this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/145857914:24
openstackLaunchpad bug 1458579 in Ceilometer "Event filtering by trait doesn't work with elasticsearch backend" [Medium,Triaged]14:24
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:24
*** prad_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:24
gordcreading14:25
*** prad_ is now known as pradk14:25
gordccdent: hmmm. i swear i just ran elasticsearch and the tests passed14:26
gordclet me try again14:26
*** rbak has quit IRC14:26
cdentgordc: I guess the issue is that maybe it doesn't work in kilo14:27
cdentand if so, what's the diff14:27
gordchttps://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/commit/906c72fc216a108cd949faf94fc2a2adda014a9b14:29
gordconly change... and it was backported14:29
* gordc running tests again14:30
cdentright on14:30
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC14:31
gordchmmm. setup-test-env-es.sh doesn't seem to work... time to hack it.14:31
cdentgordc so you're saying that bugs 1458579  and 1453919 are the same thing14:33
openstackbug 1453919 in Ceilometer kilo "elasticsearch get_events incorrect trait type" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1453919 - Assigned to gordon chung (chungg)14:33
openstackbug 1458579 in Ceilometer "Event filtering by trait doesn't work with elasticsearch backend" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/145857914:33
gordccdent: oh. no. i was just saying that was the only patch since kilo14:34
cdentoh14:35
*** nadya has quit IRC14:35
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:41
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:41
gordccdent: hmmm... either a gap in our tests or the bug is fixed14:43
*** jdandrea has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:43
gordci'll start debugging it.14:44
cdentthanks, I have zero clue about es14:45
* cdent is tired of having zero clues14:45
gordcjust know they all rich.14:45
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: add poll history to avoid duplicate samples  https://review.openstack.org/20916014:46
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:47
*** Ephur has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:47
*** Ephur has quit IRC14:52
*** IBerezovskiy has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:02
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC15:06
*** yprokule has quit IRC15:12
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:15
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: api: fix alarm deletion and update  https://review.openstack.org/20944115:19
nadyacdent: Chris, hi! are you working on aodh posgresql job?15:19
*** julim has quit IRC15:27
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:28
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:28
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:30
cdentnadya: not currently no, I did this just recently, which is related: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207840/15:33
cdentnow that that has merged we can check experimental to get some (quite simple) devstack+<storage engine> tests15:33
gordcjd__: is the proposal to disable by default in L* and remove in M*?15:34
nadyacdent: cool, I have to do the same for Ceilometer, I believe I need only create a job template with postgresql backend, I hope everything should work15:35
gordci'm not against that considering the default switched back in J*... i just think i need to send ML message15:35
gordcnadya: i hope so too.. will be great to gate against real sql15:35
cdentnadya: I think the one non-obvious thing is the need to set DEVSTACK_GATE_POSTGRES=1 in gate_hook.sh if postgres is being used15:39
cdentgordc: you have state for the elasticsearch thing I pointed at, I'm getting ready to be done for the day and just want to confirm that somebody/something is thinking about it or if not, remind myself to think about it later15:41
gordci asked yurii to reconfirm as well... i can't reproduce15:43
gordci don't have a clean machine for kilo though15:44
cdentthanks gordc15:44
*** cdent has quit IRC15:46
nadyacdent: looks like it should be done in post_test_hook, we don't have gate_hook for Ceilo yet...15:46
*** changbl has quit IRC15:47
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:50
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:08
openstackgerritNadya Shakhat proposed openstack/ceilometer: Make it possible to run postgesql functional job  https://review.openstack.org/21165116:09
*** ddieterl_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:11
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:12
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:14
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:19
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: add poll history to avoid duplicate samples  https://review.openstack.org/20916016:19
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:20
jd__gordc: I'd say so16:22
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: storage: remove unused option db2nosql_resource_id_maxlen  https://review.openstack.org/21165716:27
*** thumpba has quit IRC16:27
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:28
*** jasonamyers has quit IRC16:34
gordcjd__: kk, let me craft up an email.16:34
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: api: move API options to their own api group  https://review.openstack.org/21166016:36
*** ildikov has quit IRC16:37
*** nadya has quit IRC16:39
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: service: stop supporting deprecated group for auth option  https://review.openstack.org/21166116:39
*** htruta has quit IRC16:41
*** htruta has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:43
*** htruta has quit IRC16:44
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: storage: remove mongodb_replica_set option  https://review.openstack.org/21166516:47
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC16:48
*** htruta has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:55
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC16:56
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: api: move API options to their own api group  https://review.openstack.org/21166017:00
*** lexholden has quit IRC17:11
*** jruano has quit IRC17:16
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: support multiple-meter payloads  https://review.openstack.org/21051217:18
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Convert instance, bandwidth and SwiftMiddleware meters  https://review.openstack.org/20963717:18
*** thumpba has quit IRC17:22
*** jfluhmann has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:23
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:28
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:30
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:32
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:46
*** harlowja has quit IRC17:51
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:54
*** htruta_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:02
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:05
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC18:06
*** dikonoo has quit IRC18:10
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add support to compute cpu meters in yaml  https://review.openstack.org/21061918:16
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:18
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC18:18
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:22
*** htruta_ has quit IRC18:24
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add support to compute cpu meters in yaml  https://review.openstack.org/21061918:25
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:28
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:32
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: start rpc deprecation  https://review.openstack.org/21130418:44
*** annasort has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:45
*** ddieterl_ has quit IRC18:48
*** jfluhmann has quit IRC18:51
*** rjaiswal has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:53
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC18:59
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:05
*** jruano has quit IRC19:06
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC19:13
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:18
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:18
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add support to compute cpu meters in yaml  https://review.openstack.org/21061919:21
*** alejandrito has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:24
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:25
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:28
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC19:37
*** gordc has quit IRC19:37
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:40
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:42
*** jkraj has quit IRC19:43
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC19:58
*** nadya has quit IRC20:02
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:08
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:10
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:22
*** nadya has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:42
*** nadya has quit IRC20:43
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:48
*** jruano has quit IRC20:54
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC20:58
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:00
*** julim has quit IRC21:00
*** ddieterly has quit IRC21:04
*** thorst1 has quit IRC21:05
*** pradk has quit IRC21:16
*** liusheng has quit IRC21:25
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:26
*** rbak has quit IRC21:34
*** alejandrito has quit IRC21:41
*** ildikov has quit IRC21:51
*** hongbin has left #openstack-ceilometer22:01
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:06
*** yassine__ has quit IRC22:08
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:09
*** r-daneel has quit IRC22:12
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:17
rjaiswalHi gordc22:18
rjaiswalgordc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1482797 seems to impact multi-publisher isolation cases, not sure how we can have both - event ack/requeue and keeping publisher isolated at same time22:21
openstackLaunchpad bug 1482797 in Ceilometer "Event not requeued or ack'ed on event persistence failure" [Undecided,Triaged] - Assigned to Rohit Jaiswal (rohit-jaiswal-3)22:21
gordcrjaiswal: is this only for direct publisher?22:24
gordci should mention that publisher is mainly for testing22:25
rjaiswalgordc: Fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1482797 will break the pipeline22:26
openstackLaunchpad bug 1482797 in Ceilometer "Event not requeued or ack'ed on event persistence failure" [Undecided,Triaged] - Assigned to Rohit Jaiswal (rohit-jaiswal-3)22:26
rjaiswali think, for the requeue to happen22:26
rjaiswalIt could be any publisher, the exception is not raised in the EventSink22:28
gordcrjaiswal: but it's raised for samplesink?22:29
rjaiswalgordc: no, but there isnt any requeueing for samples, i think22:30
rjaiswalevent has a flag ack_on_event_error, which when False leads to requeueing22:33
gordcright. so i think the main reason for the requeue there is to catch that conversion done by event_converter works. if not, then requeue.22:35
gordcafter that,  once it's built a meter, i don't know if it makes sense to requeue because there are so many intermediate steps...22:36
gordci'm going to head home but could you clarify how if you fix it, the pipeline breaks?22:36
rjaiswalwhat if the event persistence fails22:36
rjaiswalok22:36
rjaiswaltheres a unit test in test_event_pipeline: test_multiple_publisher_isolation thats failing22:37
gordcevent persistence shouldn't be handled by notification agent... the direct publisher is just a side effect of old behvaiour.22:37
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC22:38
rjaiswaloh ok, the option here https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/notification.py#L3722:38
rjaiswalnp, we can chat later22:38
gordci'll need to dig into it... will sync up with you later22:39
gordcttyl22:40
rjaiswalnp, thanks22:40
rjaiswalsure22:40
*** gordc has quit IRC22:40
*** jruano has quit IRC22:54
*** ildikov has quit IRC22:58
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:08
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC23:10
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:11
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:11
openstackgerritRohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Fixed event requeuing/ack on publisher failure  https://review.openstack.org/21177923:14
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC23:15
openstackgerritRohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/aodh: Fixes querying alarm history with severity field  https://review.openstack.org/20031523:23
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:40
*** alejandrito has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:57
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:58
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:58
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!