Monday, 2015-06-29

*** Longgeek has quit IRC00:00
*** joshw42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:08
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/19397600:39
*** ddieter__ has quit IRC00:41
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:29
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:42
*** ddieterly has quit IRC01:46
*** fabian4_ has quit IRC01:49
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:51
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:59
*** fabian4 has quit IRC02:05
*** Longgeek has quit IRC02:11
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:17
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:22
*** fabian4 has quit IRC02:53
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:05
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:07
*** Longgeek has quit IRC03:20
*** ddieterly has quit IRC03:39
*** fabian4 has quit IRC03:39
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:40
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/ceilometer: Minor changes for evaluator service  https://review.openstack.org/19651903:42
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:56
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC04:26
openstackgerritRyota MIBU proposed openstack/ceilometer: Add 'event' type and 'event_rule' to alarm API  https://review.openstack.org/19537604:38
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:40
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:44
openstackgerritshubham chitranshi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Author: shubham_chitranshi Date: Mon 29th June 2015 10:20 AM (Indian Standard Time)  https://review.openstack.org/19653504:54
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:03
*** fabian4 has quit IRC05:12
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:16
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:17
*** yprokule has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:20
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:23
*** Longgeek has quit IRC05:25
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:25
*** Longgeek has quit IRC05:34
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:34
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:41
*** ddieterly has quit IRC05:45
openstackgerritshubham chitranshi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Author: shubham_chitranshi Date: Mon 29th June 2015 10:20 AM (Indian Standard Time)  https://review.openstack.org/19653506:08
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:26
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/aodh: Initial translation import  https://review.openstack.org/19655206:30
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC06:35
*** fabian4 has quit IRC06:35
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:35
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:37
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC06:40
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:42
*** ddieterly has quit IRC06:46
*** eglynn-afk has quit IRC06:51
*** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:59
*** fabian4 has quit IRC07:03
*** eglynn-afk has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:08
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:08
openstackgerritshubham chitranshi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Author: shubham_chitranshi Date: Mon 29th June 2015 10:20 AM (Indian Standard Time)  https://review.openstack.org/19653507:09
*** Longgeek has quit IRC07:13
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:13
*** Ala has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:16
*** ildikov has quit IRC07:20
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:20
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:26
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:41
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:43
*** ddieterly has quit IRC07:47
*** deepthi has quit IRC07:52
*** fabian4 has quit IRC07:58
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:05
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:08
*** fabian4 has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:11
openstackgerritChris Dent proposed openstack/ceilometer: [WIP] The start of a grenade plugin for ceilometer  https://review.openstack.org/19644108:23
*** yassine has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:32
*** Longgeek has quit IRC08:38
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:40
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:43
cdentjd__: if you're about can you put your stamp on this (if it deserves it): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196045/ I don't want to be a bad boy and merge my own patch08:46
*** kbyrne has quit IRC08:47
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:48
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:53
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:56
_nadya_cdent: hi!09:01
cdentgood morning09:01
_nadya_cdent: I have some questions about your devstack plugin. Actually, how should it work?:) Now when I'm getting a devstack I just add ceilo-services into localrc and that's all. I guess that the plugin will be used by devstack somehow? Looks like I missed some discussions about it09:04
jd__cdent: sure09:04
cdent_nadya_: One the plugin is in place and devstack itself has been updated to not have ceilometer then the way to turn on ceilometer is to have a line like this in your localrc/local.conf:09:05
cdentline 7 here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196384/2/devstack/plugin.sh,cm09:05
cdentthanks jd__09:05
cdentby default the settings file (in that same review) has it that all the services from ceilo will be enabled, you can disable some of them in the usual way: 'disable_service ceilomieter-aipmi' etc09:06
_nadya_cdent: aha, I see. Is it a devstack requirement to have plugins in each project?09:07
cdentIt's not a requirement yet, but it is a goal to get most stuff moved out to plugins09:07
cdentthe win for us is that it allows a lot more flexibility on making changes09:07
cdentwhich I figure given the splits happening, is going to be an issue09:08
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:08
cdentBasically: I figured that we need to have a solid example of a plugin that we control so that we can then devolve some of the plugin functionality to devstack plugins we create in the split off repos09:08
_nadya_cdent: yep, sure. And it will be easier for us to merge to our repo, not to devstack each time09:09
cdentyes09:09
_nadya_ok! thanks09:10
cdentThe tricky bit now is figuring out the proper procedure for merging the giant stack of related changes09:10
jd__gordc_: cdent: just checked but actually sileht will be back next Monday :)09:10
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:10
cdentjd__: what's the standard pto amount there in france?09:11
jd__cdent: 30-35 days / year09:12
* cdent moves to france09:12
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:12
jd__cdent: legal minimum is 2509:12
_nadya_folks, I'd like to discuss one Gnocchi-related question with you. About API. If we want use Influx without Indexer (it's theoretically possible I guess) we may implement corresponding stuff in the storage lvl. But now we have Indexer calls in REST (https://github.com/openstack/gnocchi/blob/master/gnocchi/rest/__init__.py#L547 ) Is it ok to move it deeper?09:17
_nadya_jd__, cdent ^^09:18
jd___nadya_: not as a first step09:19
jd___nadya_: but as a second or third step definitely09:19
cdentWhen influxdb came up on the mailing list recently I suggested the random idea that maybe the indexer interface is also influxdb (the same one storage is using)09:20
_nadya_jd__: ook, what should we wait for?09:20
ityaptinjd__: What do you see as a first step in this activity?09:20
cdentso basically both interfaces are talking to the same backend09:20
jd___nadya_: having a driver that use the standard indexer09:20
jd__or what cdent said if that can work too09:20
cdentI don't actually know if that _can_ work, it just seems like it would be cool if it could.09:21
_nadya_cdent: yep, right. We decided to use this idea but failed on REST level :)09:21
cdent:(09:21
cdentbummer09:21
cdenthow/why did it fail?09:21
_nadya_jd__: aha, I see. So first you merge the current code which is on review:)?09:22
cdent(aside: it's such a shame we don't regularly do collaborative code development ... just collaborative code review)09:22
ityaptinjd__: Do you mind if i fix merge confict and InfuxDb api conflict in your InfluxDB storage patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165407/ ?09:22
ityaptinjd__: Currently in patch we use "name" when write datapoints, but InfluxDB expects a "measurement" field. Same issue between "timestamp" and "time" fields09:23
ityaptincdent: We didn't see to move all indexer activity to InfluxDB but want to write resource metadata as tags in InfluxDb points for fast filter queries and simplification of UI plugins.09:24
_nadya_cdent: when we do this https://github.com/openstack/gnocchi/blob/master/gnocchi/rest/__init__.py#L518 we call indexer. But we don't want it in case of Influx. So we may don't want to call Indexer interface on REST lvl09:24
jd___nadya_: yeah I'd like to have the current driver finished and merged09:26
cdentso yeah, what I'm suggesting is that when you call methods on the influx implementation of the indexer class, it will call into the storage implementation to get the information it needs09:26
jd__ityaptin: no go ahead, you can update the patch as you wish!09:26
cdentthat's the benefit of having _interfaces_ isn't it?09:26
* jd__ voted for virtual mid-cycle and all09:27
* cdent gives jd__ a gold start09:27
cdentstar!09:27
cdentPerhaps now that you've crossed the line jd__ others will too09:29
cdentI'm taking it that you are using the A vote to also signal your '+'?09:29
jd__I certainly hope so09:29
jd__cdent: oh yeah let me add that09:29
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:30
jd__damn aodh is live https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/aodh/09:37
jd__I know what I'm gonna do this week09:37
cdentyeah, that happened yesterday09:37
openstackgerritChris Dent proposed openstack/ceilometer: Create a devstack plugin for ceilometer  https://review.openstack.org/19638409:40
cdentjd__, _nadya_ ^ that can be review and merged without impacting the normal devstack. It will make it easier to test in more ways if it is merged. I tested it pretty extensively over the weekend. So if you get a chance to review/think about it today that would be awesome.09:42
jd__cdent: ah that looks awesome!09:42
*** arunman has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:43
cdentjd__: there's also this which is the other side of the coin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196383/09:43
jd__ceilometer, always bleeding edge09:44
cdents/edge//09:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:44
jd__:D09:44
*** ddieterly has quit IRC09:49
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:53
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:53
*** kairat_kushaev has left #openstack-ceilometer09:59
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Replaces methods deprecated in pymongo3.0  https://review.openstack.org/19661110:03
jd__is it going to pass? suspense10:03
*** uschreiber_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:03
*** uschreiber_ has quit IRC10:05
*** fabian4 has quit IRC10:05
*** eglynn-afk is now known as eglynn10:19
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:25
*** shardy has quit IRC10:27
*** shardy_ has quit IRC10:31
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:31
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:34
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:35
openstackgerritFawad Khaliq proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Pluggable network metering drivers  https://review.openstack.org/19662110:37
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC10:37
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: (WIP)Add user/project information to Ceilometer Event Model  https://review.openstack.org/19662410:39
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:39
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:45
*** afazekas__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:49
*** yprokule has quit IRC10:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC10:50
*** yprokule1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:51
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC10:53
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC10:53
*** afazekas__ has quit IRC10:54
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:02
*** afazekas__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:07
*** ildikov has quit IRC11:08
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:18
*** shardy has quit IRC11:19
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:22
*** shardy_ has quit IRC11:24
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:25
_nadya_jd__: I see that you are voting for mini-sprint for alarm split, could you please add a list of questions to discuss here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-liberty-midcycle-agenda? It would be helpful for planning11:30
_nadya_jd__: I've made smth like an example in Graceful pipeline section11:31
jd___nadya_: k11:32
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:36
openstackgerritFawad Khaliq proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Pluggable network metering drivers  https://review.openstack.org/19662111:37
_nadya_cdent: it's hard to choose among the topiсs without descriptions:( Could you please remind what is "polling nova improvements"? Refuse from polling, listen for updates?11:39
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:46
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC11:46
*** ddieterly has quit IRC11:51
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:52
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed openstack/gnocchi: Fix abstract `process_measures` method signature  https://review.openstack.org/19663411:56
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:56
ityaptinjd__: ^^^11:56
ityaptinjd__: Could you take a look?11:56
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:57
*** ildikov has quit IRC11:57
ityaptincdent:  I also hope that you take a look to patch  https://review.openstack.org/196634, too.11:58
* cdent looks11:58
ityaptincdent: Thanks!11:59
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Replaces methods deprecated in pymongo3.0  https://review.openstack.org/19661112:02
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Disable msgfmt in pep8  https://review.openstack.org/19663512:02
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: (WIP)Add user/project information to Ceilometer Event Model  https://review.openstack.org/19662412:02
*** thorst has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:03
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed openstack/gnocchi: InfluxDB storage driver  https://review.openstack.org/16540712:09
cdentildikov_: I just sent some more email to the os-dev list about how to add more detail to the topics12:22
cdentgeneral topics only on the voting page, more details on the agenda page12:22
ildikov_cdent: ok, cool, sorry for the mess12:22
cdentNo worries, I probably should have made it more clear from the start12:23
ildikov_I also wasn't 100% sure that the production ready Gnocchi topic would cover this too, but now the item is at the right place12:23
cdentI think we can and probably should lump all the gnocchi stuff into one chunk of time12:24
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:27
openstackgerritDivya K Konoor proposed openstack/ceilometer: (WIP)Add user/project information to Ceilometer Event Model  https://review.openstack.org/19662412:29
openstackgerritAleksey Ripinen proposed openstack/ceilometer: Indexes changes in mongodb  https://review.openstack.org/19664512:37
openstackgerritAleksey Ripinen proposed openstack/ceilometer: Indexes changes in mongodb  https://review.openstack.org/19664512:39
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:41
*** shardy has quit IRC12:46
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:46
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:47
*** eglynn has quit IRC12:49
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC12:51
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC12:51
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:52
*** dikonoor has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:56
*** arunman has quit IRC13:00
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/gnocchi: Fix abstract `process_measures` method signature  https://review.openstack.org/19663413:01
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:01
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC13:06
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:07
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:07
*** Ala has quit IRC13:11
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC13:12
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:12
*** jruano has quit IRC13:12
*** deepthi has quit IRC13:13
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:13
*** gordc_ is now known as gordc13:14
gordctherve: if possible, could you verify if this patch works? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19633013:16
therveSure13:16
gordctherve: thanks! (i'd do it myself but i'm not sure how to run heat integration tests)13:17
thervegordc, Me neither, I'll ask the gate :)13:17
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:23
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:24
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:24
gordctherve: :)13:25
gordcthat works too13:25
*** pauldix has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:28
*** edmondsw has quit IRC13:33
gordcildikov_: did you ever have a plan for proposing project_id be a mandatory param?13:35
ildikov_gordc: In what context do you mean? :)13:35
ildikov_gordc: I had a plan to introduce project based pipeline config, which would obviously need it, but we never got there, as it would require the db-based config for instance13:36
ildikov_but for hw meters for instance, not Ironic managed ones, we will not have any13:37
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:38
*** afazekas__ has quit IRC13:38
ildikov_if we are talking about events, I guess it can be a reasonable proposal13:38
_nadya__cdent: sorry, I was ought to go. Thanks for answers in ML :)13:41
gordcildikov_: sorry, got pulled into side discussion13:41
gordcildikov_: i was thinking more about project id importance as it seems like all the api access rules/use cases seem to revolve around project id13:41
ildikov_gordc: np, I can always fall back to write mails... :)13:42
gordcie. you can only access data in your project.13:42
gordcresource is important but it seems from ACL and data management POV, project is just as important13:42
*** prad has quit IRC13:43
ildikov_yeap, when we talk about non-admin users it is13:43
ildikov_I mean not just from data collection PoV, but in general13:43
ildikov_it is, what I referred to in case of the event alarms that data without project_id should not be accessible for everyone for instance13:44
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:44
gordcildikov_: yeah... maybe the idea is that if there's a project id, it's scoped... if it doesn't exist, it's admin only data?13:44
gordcis that how it functions now? maybe that's how it should?13:45
ildikov_gordc: this is my opinion for sure13:45
gordcildikov_: cool cool. i think i'll look at how it behaves currently.13:45
ildikov_I'm not sure about the current state, I wrote in that review as a desired way of functioning, I haven't checked13:45
ildikov_I planned to check though, but I couldn;t get there13:46
gordcildikov_: ok. i'll check maybe tomorrow.13:46
gordcildikov_: will let you know when i do.13:46
ildikov_gordc: cool, thanks much13:47
ildikov_gordc: did you ask because of the schematization or some similar topic?13:47
gordcildikov_: sort of? i'm always secretly pushing schematisation13:48
ildikov_gordc: I volunteer to join to the mission :)13:49
ildikov_gordc: maybe we can consider some less secret way too :)13:49
gordcildikov_: google "how long to travel to pluto" that will be a quicker mission than schematisation in OpenStack13:51
ildikov_gordc: LOL :)13:52
gordcildikov_: did you have any ideas? i'd assume the easy push would be to have resource_id in standard place13:52
ildikov_gordc: I like challenges ;)13:52
gordcildikov_: i commented on the message format for Heat. i suggested they put certain values in same place as CADF (since audit part was not necessary for them)13:53
gordci am also heavily CADF biased.13:53
ildikov_gordc: yeap, that review is in my queue too :S13:54
gordci don't know if they are making any progress or if they decided how'd they proceed13:54
ildikov_CADF is good, although I don't know how suitable it is in general for all the notifications13:55
ildikov_I didn't really expect fast movement there TBH13:55
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:55
ildikov_I think if we start with the resource_id as a first step it's ok13:55
gordcildikov_: yeah, it's too verbose for non-audit use cases, my suggestion was to keep the values that do overlap in same place.13:55
ildikov_I will try to follow what Nova guy's are planning with their notifications13:56
ildikov_I hope they will get there to have schemas, if yes, then it would be beneficial to cooperate with them in their notification tidy up work13:57
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC13:57
gordcildikov_: agree. is there a spec related to their schema?13:57
gordcfor nova13:57
ildikov_but that's in the same shoe as always, it's important, but there are more important things to do...13:57
ildikov_they fight with resource bandwidth issues quite heavily and this task would really require some cores13:58
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:59
ildikov_so no spec yet as far as I know13:59
*** dulek has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:00
openstackgerritAleksey Ripinen proposed openstack/ceilometer: Indexes changes in mongodb  https://review.openstack.org/19664514:02
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:03
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC14:08
*** r-mibu has quit IRC14:09
openstackgerritRohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Implementation of dynamically reloadable pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/19084214:12
*** rjaiswal has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:12
dulekcdent: Hi!14:14
cdentHi dulek14:14
dulekcdent: I've seen your commit to DevStack adding Redis for ceilometer coordination.14:14
* cdent nods14:14
dulekcdent: We're now exploring tooz in Cinder and tooz-based service groups in Nova.14:14
cdentcool!14:14
dulekcdent: I wonder if ceilometer has a gate testing itself with Redis as coordination backend?14:15
cdentI don't _think_ so. gordc you recall?14:15
cdentI think there was some discussion about making it happen but I don't know that it ever did14:15
dulekcdent: Okay, thanks, then probably Nova will be first as they require it. :)14:16
dulekcdent: Another question is - from what I could see in your DevStack's commits right now it doesn't consider multinode DevStack deployments?14:17
cdentI can't remember who it was now, but there was a some discussion about trying to get some infrastructure in place for many of the drivers that tooz can use. I suspect what happened is that instead of just saying "how about we just stick to redis" too much was wanted all at once.14:17
*** pauldix has quit IRC14:17
cdentthe ceilometer use of redis at the moment assumes there is only one redis server14:18
cdenthowever tooz can support using redis-sentinel14:18
dulekcdent: Oh, and Redis will be installed on that redis-server only.14:18
cdents/use of redis/use of redis in devkstack/14:18
dulekcdent: Okay.14:19
cdentyeah, and if you were to have multiple compute nodes that needed their ceilometer-compute-agents to coordinate, they'd talk to the same server14:19
cdentbut that's just a limitation of the way it is currently set up in devstack, not an actual limitation14:19
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:19
dulekcdent: In Nova case we would need some kind of logic to decide where to install Redis and where not. And maybe redis-sentinel clustering of these nodes...14:19
dulekcdent: Yeah, this would just require more work, nothing else.14:20
dulekcdent: Okay, thanks a lot for clarifying on that! :)14:20
cdentLet me know if there's any way I can be helpful if stuff comes up later.14:21
dulekcdent: Okay, thank you for this offer.14:23
rjaiswalgordc, cdent et al: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190842/ up for review, please take a look, thanks14:23
*** bluex-pl has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:24
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:37
gordccdent: there is none that i know of.14:38
*** dikonoor has quit IRC14:38
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:49
*** pauldix has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC14:50
*** shardy_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:51
*** shardy has quit IRC14:51
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC14:52
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC14:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:53
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed openstack/ceilometer: [MongoDB] Use a aggregate pipeline in statistics  https://review.openstack.org/17234014:53
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:57
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC14:57
*** shardy_ has quit IRC15:00
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC15:00
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:04
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:05
*** jruano has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:06
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:23
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle15:27
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:29
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC15:32
*** cdent has quit IRC15:32
*** yassine has quit IRC15:37
*** yassine has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:37
*** cmyster has quit IRC15:48
*** obedmr has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:57
*** fawadk has quit IRC16:01
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Move aodh.alarm.storage to aodh.storage  https://review.openstack.org/19672216:05
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Move 'alarm_connection' to 'connection'  https://review.openstack.org/19672316:05
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:08
*** earnThis has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:16
earnThiscan ceilometer be used as a standalone tool?16:17
*** apopovych has quit IRC16:23
*** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:25
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:27
*** apopovych has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:27
*** apopovych has left #openstack-ceilometer16:28
edmondswgordc, what is the ceilometer spec deadline for liberty?16:30
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:32
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC16:43
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:43
edmondswI see test-requirements on master now requires pymongo>=3.0.2 ... does that mean MongoDB >=3.0.2, or does pymongo 3.0.2 work with an older MongoDB 2.6 or something?16:44
edmondswthis says MongoDB minimum version is 2.4, and I'm wondering if that is still accurate: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/install/manual.html16:47
edmondsweglynn, dhellmann, jd__ can one of you answer those questions?16:48
dhellmannedmondsw: I would expect the client library to work with an older version of the service, but I don't know whether that's true or not. I'm not sure what the spec deadline is.16:48
edmondswtx... yeah, haven't found anything definitive with google so far16:49
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC16:50
jd__I don't know either16:51
*** changbl has quit IRC16:53
ityaptinedmondsw: Hi! Do you need this table? http://docs.mongodb.org/ecosystem/drivers/python/#mongodb-compatibility16:55
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Move aodh.alarm.storage to aodh.storage  https://review.openstack.org/19672216:55
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed openstack/aodh: Move 'alarm_connection' to 'connection'  https://review.openstack.org/19672316:55
edmondswityaptin, yes! thank you!16:56
ityaptinjd__: jd: I am going to add some improvements to InfluxDB storage patch for support all gnocchi requests with current data scheme if you don't mind16:58
*** bluex-pl has quit IRC16:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/ceilometer: Add support for posting samples to notification-agent via API  https://review.openstack.org/19633017:00
*** dscottsf has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:05
*** yprokule1 has quit IRC17:06
*** dscottsf has quit IRC17:09
*** lsmola has quit IRC17:09
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:14
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:16
gordcedmondsw: i don't think there's a formal date. generally 2 weeks before *-3 release. so mid-august.17:21
edmondswgordc, tx... I thought it was much later than nova17:22
gordcedmondsw: we're not that strict on it... that said, if it's a highly opinionated feature, it's best to get it in asap17:22
edmondswyep17:23
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:30
*** dontalton has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:32
*** yassine has quit IRC17:37
*** ViswaV_ has quit IRC17:42
*** ViswaV has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:43
*** earnThis has quit IRC17:45
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC17:45
*** jaosorior has quit IRC17:46
*** Ephur has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:47
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:47
*** safchain has quit IRC17:48
thorstHi All.  Does anyone know who to add for a new global-requirement?  My proposed Ceilometer change (for the base PowerVM inspector support) is blocked until I get that new global requirement added...but I wasn't able to find who to add for global-requirements reviews (or an IRC for it).17:51
gordcthorst: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/131,members17:52
gordcyour best bet might be sdague since he's a Nova person17:53
thorstgordc: Thanks!17:53
gordcthorst: np17:54
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:02
*** Ephur has quit IRC18:03
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:08
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:11
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:29
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:30
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:30
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: set default limit to meter/sample queries  https://review.openstack.org/19679218:33
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:38
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:41
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:44
gordcdhellmann: do you know if something is wrong with requirements auto-patching? we're getting this is ceilometer: http://logs.openstack.org/76/193976/8/check/gate-ceilometer-requirements/8ff2661/console.html#_2015-06-29_01_32_45_17318:48
*** boris-42 has quit IRC19:12
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC19:15
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:17
*** shardy has quit IRC19:22
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:23
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:26
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC19:27
*** ankita_wagh has quit IRC19:34
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: WIP add mandatory limit value to event list  https://review.openstack.org/19682719:44
*** fawadk has quit IRC19:46
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: remove unused event query  https://review.openstack.org/19683119:54
*** shardy has quit IRC19:55
*** jaosorior has quit IRC19:56
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:57
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:58
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:00
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:01
*** dscottsf has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:02
*** ankita_wagh has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:03
*** ddieterly has quit IRC20:08
*** ityaptin_laptop has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:17
*** dscottsf has quit IRC20:21
*** Longgeek has quit IRC20:21
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/19397620:26
*** jruano has quit IRC20:26
*** dontalton has quit IRC20:26
*** julim has quit IRC20:29
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:31
*** edmondsw has quit IRC20:43
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC20:51
*** ityaptin_laptop has quit IRC21:13
*** gordc is now known as gordc_21:17
*** gordc_ is now known as gordc_afk21:17
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:22
*** r-daneel has quit IRC21:23
*** packet has quit IRC21:26
*** thorst has quit IRC21:27
openstackgerritRohit Jaiswal proposed openstack/ceilometer: Implementation of dynamically reloadable pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/19084221:44
*** Longgeek has quit IRC21:56
*** Matt1360 has quit IRC22:08
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:23
*** prad has quit IRC22:31
*** jaosorior has quit IRC22:36
*** yassine has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:38
*** yassine has quit IRC22:47
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC22:56
*** pauldix has quit IRC23:13
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:24
*** obedmr has quit IRC23:32
*** boris-42 has quit IRC23:32
*** obedmr has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:32
*** obedmr has quit IRC23:35
*** jwcroppe_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:38
*** jwcroppe has quit IRC23:42
*** jwcroppe_ has quit IRC23:43
*** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:50
*** edmondsw has quit IRC23:51
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!