Wednesday, 2014-08-13

*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:00
*** Qiming has quit IRC00:12
*** sdake has quit IRC00:16
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:24
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:25
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:29
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:29
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:10
*** drjones has quit IRC01:14
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:14
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC01:19
openstackgerritRen Qiaowei proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: List the instances  https://review.openstack.org/11224401:19
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:23
openstackgerritAngus Lees proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Issue one SQL statement per execute() call  https://review.openstack.org/11374301:35
*** stevelle is now known as steve|away02:04
*** sbfox has quit IRC02:28
openstackgerritRen Qiaowei proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: XenAPI support: List the instances  https://review.openstack.org/11224402:35
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:45
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:47
*** ccrouch has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:55
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:01
*** fnaval has quit IRC03:06
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:15
*** shardy has quit IRC03:31
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:35
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:50
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:32
*** yatin has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:34
*** ildikov has quit IRC04:36
*** fnaval has quit IRC04:49
*** amalagon has quit IRC05:02
*** samm has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:08
sammHey, can u please tell me is there any use of Nova, if I am using ceilomter,keystone,swift05:15
*** Dafna has quit IRC05:22
*** Dafna has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:25
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:25
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:30
*** Qiming has quit IRC05:37
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:40
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:46
*** steve|away has quit IRC05:49
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:03
*** Qiming has quit IRC06:20
*** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:28
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:33
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:37
sammHi All, I am getting api_paste_config file not found error, while running cmd: ceilometer-api.   The log location is:http://paste.openstack.org/show/94216/07:13
*** yasukun has quit IRC07:21
*** yasukun has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:22
*** eglynn has quit IRC07:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:32
*** rwsu has quit IRC07:34
*** mst89 has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:35
*** mst89 has quit IRC07:35
*** flwang_ has quit IRC07:35
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:37
*** Longgeek has quit IRC07:46
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:46
*** Qiming has quit IRC07:48
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:49
*** Longgeek has quit IRC07:51
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:52
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:54
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:58
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:01
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:05
openstackgerritVitaly Gridnev proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Update docs with Sahara notifications configuration  https://review.openstack.org/11327208:08
*** Longgeek has quit IRC08:10
*** ifarkas has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:20
*** sbfox has quit IRC08:23
*** yasukun has quit IRC08:29
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:50
eglynnjd__: hola! ... you might want to cast your eye over the gnocchi discussion with the TC last night09:02
eglynnjd__: logged here ... http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-08-12-20.02.log.html#l-40809:02
eglynnjd__: Monty raised the "why not use carbon?" question ... IIRC you evaluated using whisper/carbon as an option and rejected it?09:03
jd__eglynn: definitely09:03
eglynnjd__: I couldn't remember the exact reasons tho', other than the code quality seemed low and resistant to change?09:03
jd__yeah, and there'a s few limitation in the whisper format too09:03
jd__which are likely very hard to hack on since the code is ugly and there's 0 testing09:04
eglynnjd__: would it make sense to rely on the gnocchi thread on the ML with a super-quick summary of that?09:04
jd__it would make sense if someone asked that on the list09:05
jd__I hate when we mix IRC/ml threads without any link09:05
eglynnOK, fair enough09:05
* eglynn was also thinking there's also a lack of support for cross-series aggregation and dimensioning, but wasn't 100% sure of that09:06
jd__that too – though I'm sure one could argue we could add it on top of whisper09:07
jd__to be fair I was thinking about writing a first blog post about Gnocchi, my "research" and how we ended up on that, etc09:07
jd__I guess it's time to do it09:07
jd__that should cover the TC interrogation too09:08
eglynnjd__: yeah, a blog post like that would be really useful I think09:08
* eglynn LOLs at interrogation :) ... you are not wrong on that!09:09
jd__I'll definitely start on that09:09
eglynncool, thank you sir!09:09
jd__well honestly I understood the "wtf are you doing"09:09
eglynnthe "WTF" from the TC, d'ya mean?09:10
jd__yep – you can clearly look at Gnocchi and says "NIH syndrom" or "Ceilometer rewriten from scratch?" or whatever if you don't know the field09:10
jd__s/says/ponders/09:11
* eglynn was a tad disappointed tho' that some had clearly not read the nearly week-old ML thread09:11
eglynn(despite it being linked in the agenda)09:11
jd__yeah :(09:11
jd__fortunately I've a 2 hours train journey tonight so… I know what I'll do09:12
jd__eglynn: btw I've sent a first simple patch for archiving policy, if you can take a look09:12
eglynnwifi on SNCF for the win! :)09:12
jd__it's a first step09:12
jd__eglynn: bah you wish :( when traveling in the country, ya don't even have EDGE sometime :)09:12
eglynnjd__: yeah I saw that patch, thanks! ... it's on my todo list for this morning :)09:13
jd__krewl09:13
jd__kewl*09:13
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:15
*** dmsimardz has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:29
*** dmsimardz is now known as dmsimard09:30
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC09:30
*** dmsimard_away has quit IRC09:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:31
*** renlt has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:32
*** ssakhamuri_ has quit IRC09:33
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:48
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:52
*** flwang_ has quit IRC09:52
*** yatin has quit IRC10:00
*** zul has quit IRC10:00
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:01
*** yatin has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:07
*** Qiming has quit IRC10:16
*** yatin has quit IRC10:23
*** yatin has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:30
*** ityaptin has quit IRC10:31
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:36
*** Longgeek has quit IRC10:41
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:48
*** heyongli has quit IRC10:49
ildikov_nadya_: hi10:49
ildikov_nadya_: just a quick question I'm not sure in10:49
ildikov_nadya_: is ceilometer-expirer supported for HBase too?10:50
ildikov_nadya_: so if someone sets the time_to_live value, will the old samples/resources/users be cleaned up if Ceilometer is configured with HBase?10:51
_nadya_ildikov: hi! no, we are thinking how to implement this10:52
ildikov_nadya_: ok, thanks, that is what I thought, but I wasn't sure10:53
_nadya_ildikov: HBase has ttl parameter but it's hard to set through python10:53
ildikov_nadya_: I needed the info for the Admin guide I'm writing now for Ceilo, I will add a note about this there10:54
ildikov_nadya_: that sounds pretty unfortunate :(10:54
_nadya_ok10:54
DinaBelovajd__, take a look on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113842/10:56
DinaBelovajd__, that turns py33 off for the stable branches10:57
*** renlt has quit IRC11:01
jd__DinaBelova: +111:04
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:10
flwang1eglynn: ping11:10
eglynnflwang1: 'sup?11:11
flwang1eglynn: may i know what's the ^policy^ of ceilmeter for adding a pollster? if the metric has been collected by notification11:12
eglynnflwang1: a pollster is only needed if (a) there's no notification or (b) the notification cadence is insufficient11:12
flwang1eglynn: ok, but we're running into some issues if we only depends on the notifications11:14
flwang1eglynn: I totally understand the benefit of notification11:14
flwang1eglynn: but you know, mq is not always reliable11:14
eglynnflwang1: sure, but if AMQP is broken almost nothing will work in openstack11:15
eglynnflwang1: no new instances or volumes etc.11:15
flwang1i see.11:16
eglynnflwang1: so the main reason for using polling is not that we don't trust AMQP notifications11:17
eglynnflwang1: ... rather it's more that it some cases the info needed simply isn't surfaced via notifications11:17
eglynnflwang1: ... or it is, but those notification don't occur often enough11:17
flwang1eglynn: I think the main concern for pollster is the database workload, right?11:18
eglynnflwang1: ... rather it's more that *in some cases the info needed simply isn't surfaced via notifications11:18
*** deepthi has quit IRC11:18
eglynnflwang1: no, the concern is API load11:18
eglynnflwang1: ... e.g. load on the nova-api service for example11:18
flwang1eglynn: ok, make sense11:19
flwang1and another case is we want to bill some existed resources which may not be collected before ceilometer deployed11:20
flwang1eglynn: any suggestion for that case?11:21
eglynnflwang1: one sec11:22
flwang1eglynn: or for some reasons,  we lost the notifications11:23
flwang1eglynn: a real case is we found the ceilometer process was hang11:24
flwang1if there is a user did some operations in the period before we restart the ceilometer process, we definitely lost the notifications happened in that period11:25
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:26
eglynnflwang1: if the ceilometer process are restarted without having consumed the notifcation, surely this will still be available for consumption after the restart?11:26
flwang1I know it's rare, but it's very possible11:26
flwang1let me give more details11:27
flwang1we do have some monitor script for openstack services, for ceilometer, initially, we just monitor the process status11:27
flwang1but then we found ceilometer-api was ^hang^, it can write data into database, maybe a timeout to database, I can't remember that clearly11:29
flwang1obviously, we may lost some notifications at that period11:29
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Enhancing the make_test_data script  https://review.openstack.org/10250211:29
flwang1for this scenario, it's hard to recover some key data we want to charge the customer11:29
eglynnflwang1: what is the actual resource in question here?11:31
flwang1network, instance, anything is possible, TBH11:32
flwang1because ceilometer can't write data into database, thought itself maybe still alive11:32
eglynnflwang1: reason I ask is we *already* do the belt'n'braces in the case of instance11:33
eglynnflwang1: ... i.e. we already *both* consume notifications *and* poll to populate the same meter11:35
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Adding init into tools folder  https://review.openstack.org/10994611:35
flwang1so i'm thinking is there any possibility to improve the pollster so that admin can trigger it on demand11:35
eglynnflwang1: ... reason for that is that the frequency of the nova audit notification insufficient (min period==1 hour)11:35
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:38
eglynnflwang1: ... is there a corresponding audit notification on the networking side?11:38
flwang1eglynn: do you think it's a reasonable requirement that cloud amdin can trigger specific or all pollster manually?11:38
flwang1eglynn: I'm not sure, TBH11:39
eglynnflwang1: well we discussed that at length before in the context of testing, and the consensus was not to go down that path11:39
flwang1eglynn: but I would say the other kind of resources may run into same issue11:39
eglynnflwang1: ... i.e. to leave the polling cycles as periodic tasks11:39
flwang1eglynn: :(11:40
flwang1may I know why? what's the concern?11:40
flwang1it's just adding an option for admin user, I don't think it breaks any existed stuff11:41
eglynnflwang1: the concern, from the testing PoV, was that it would lead to tests in Tempest that tested the test mechanism (manually triggering the polling cycle) not the production mechanism (polling as periodic tasks)11:43
flwang1eglynn: i can't be convinced by this reason from the operation view :)11:48
flwang1eglynn: but thanks for the clarification, I will think it a bit more11:48
eglynnflwang1: k, np!11:48
*** sam__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:49
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:53
sam__Hi, i alarm on image saying that notify when size is equal to 1.0. Though the State is alarm why i am not getting any notification.(The alarm action is log )11:53
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:54
sam__Any alarm-evaluator/notifier expert here pls help11:54
eglynnsam__: are you seeing the image samples in the metering store?11:55
*** renatoarmani has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:55
sam__yup11:55
eglynnsam__: what is the alarm state reported by $ ceilometer alarm-list11:55
eglynnsam__: is the alarm-evaluator service running?11:56
eglynnsam__: are there errors in the alarm-evaluator logs?11:56
sam__@eglynn: it says "alarm" it just that alarm-notifier service doesnt notify anything11:56
eglynnsam__: and the alarm-notifier service is running? ... and no errors in its logs?11:56
eglynnsam__: the log action means "write the notification to the alarm-notifier log file"11:57
sam__eglynn: No thete is no erroe..yes i am running alarm-notifier service11:57
*** flwang_ has quit IRC11:57
sam__eglynn: i gave alarm action like this --alarm-action 'log://'11:58
eglynnsam__: $ grep ALARM_UUID alarm-notifier.log11:58
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:59
sam__eglynn: i dont have alarm-notifier.log, i am using devstack12:00
eglynnsam__: can you make the check the equivalent check with the screen session?12:01
eglynnsam__: screen -r ... navigate to the alarm-notifier screen ... ctrl+[ a ... ?ALARM_UUID12:01
sam__eglynn: ok let me ckeck12:03
sam__eglynn: But still when i run manually ceilometer-alarm-notifier -d i should be abale to see "Notifying alarm %(alarm_id)s from %(previous)s" this message ..isnt it?12:10
eglynnsam__: in the log output from that service, which goes to the screen by default in devstack, you should see an INFO message ""Notifying alarm $ALARM_UUID ..."12:12
eglynnsam__: assuming the log severity is not set to exclude INFOI12:13
sam__eglynn: No the log is set to INFO12:14
eglynn-officesam__: I just all that in my devstack12:17
eglynn-officesam__: I see this in the ceilometer-alarm-notifier screen session ...12:18
eglynn-office2014-08-13 13:17:04.795 19206 INFO ceilometer.alarm.notifier.log [-] Notifying alarm e3475040-ca81-4e41-b7c0-3dc944c0e18c from insufficient data to alarm with action SplitResult(scheme=u'log', netloc=u'', path=u'', query='', fragment='') because Transition to alarm due to 1 samples outside threshold, most recent: 1.012:18
*** renatoar_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:18
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: [HBase] Catch AlreadyExists error in Connection upgrade  https://review.openstack.org/11350412:19
*** renatoarmani has quit IRC12:20
*** boris-42 has quit IRC12:21
sam__eglynn-office: Ok i am setting up devstack again will let u know in few minutes12:21
sam__eglynn-office: Now i am able to see alarm info on my log (i set alarm-notifier.log)..thanks for help.12:30
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:30
eglynn-officesam__: cool, np!12:31
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:32
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: [Hbase] Add column for source filter in _get_meter_samples  https://review.openstack.org/10055812:38
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Documented Stevedore usage and source details  https://review.openstack.org/11190712:41
openstackgerritNejc Saje proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Central agent work-load partitioning  https://review.openstack.org/11354912:46
*** promulo has quit IRC12:48
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:50
*** julim has quit IRC12:52
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:53
*** yatin has quit IRC13:08
*** underyx is now known as underyx|off13:08
*** underyx|off is now known as underyx13:08
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:10
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:10
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:11
*** tongli has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:38
*** ilyashakhat_ has quit IRC13:40
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:54
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:56
*** underyx is now known as underyx|off13:57
*** underyx|off is now known as underyx13:58
*** flwang_ has quit IRC13:58
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:00
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:03
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:04
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:06
sam__eglynn-office: i miss some of alarms on notifier alarm though the state of alarm gets changed..do you know why?14:08
*** flwang1 has quit IRC14:08
sam__notifier-log*14:08
eglynnsam__: nope, what do you mean by "some"?14:09
eglynnsam__: a random selection of state transitions are missed>14:09
eglynn?14:09
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:09
sam__eglynn-office: No i mean suppose i set alarm on 5 alarms, on the log side i gets ony 2 or 3 alarm saying that "Notify alarm..."14:10
sam__Not all alarms are getting logged14:10
sam__But when i do ceilometer alarm-list i can see that alarm-state is "alarm"14:11
eglynnsam__: what do you mean by "set alarm"?14:11
sam__ok, set alarm means create alarm <sorry>14:11
eglynnsam__: $ ceilometer alarm-update -a $ALARM_UUID --state alarm # <== is that what you mean?14:11
sam__No.."ceilometer alarm-threshold-create --name 1 --descri.."14:12
eglynnsam__: you should see a notification for every alarm state transition with the log action associated with the target state14:12
eglynnsam__: if you're not seeing that, and haven't made any other errors, then it's a bug14:13
eglynnsam__: can you file a bug for this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+filebug14:13
sam__eglynn: Ya that is what expected but i am not seeing for few alarm but alarm-list  shows me that state is alarm14:13
sam__ok14:13
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:17
*** renatoarmani has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:20
*** renatoar_ has quit IRC14:22
*** Longgeek has quit IRC14:29
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:30
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:30
*** sbfox has quit IRC14:31
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:31
*** julim has quit IRC14:36
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:37
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:46
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:46
*** ildikov has quit IRC15:06
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:35
*** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:36
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:55
*** flwang_ has quit IRC15:59
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:00
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC16:00
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:00
*** sbfox has quit IRC16:00
*** k4n0 has quit IRC16:01
*** steve|away has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:14
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:16
*** steve|away is now known as stevelle16:17
*** Qiming has quit IRC16:19
*** mst89 has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:34
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:37
*** mst89 has quit IRC16:40
*** claudiub has quit IRC16:42
openstackgerritDina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Fix endpoint to poll if Swift uses RADOS  https://review.openstack.org/11396916:43
*** itisit has quit IRC16:47
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:47
*** Longgeek has quit IRC16:57
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:57
*** deepthi has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:02
*** mst89 has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:07
*** mst89 has quit IRC17:07
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC17:08
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:09
*** sbfox has quit IRC17:09
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:09
*** deepthi has quit IRC17:15
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:18
*** sbfox has quit IRC17:24
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:24
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Doc enhancement for API service deployment with mod_wsgi  https://review.openstack.org/11162317:33
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Improve performance of libvirt inspector requests  https://review.openstack.org/9837717:33
*** fnaval has quit IRC17:39
*** thomasem_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:41
*** thomasem has quit IRC17:43
*** ccrouch has quit IRC17:43
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:56
*** ccrouch has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:58
*** flwang_ has quit IRC18:00
*** promulo has quit IRC18:03
*** underyx is now known as underyx|off18:06
*** thomasem_ has quit IRC18:14
*** mst89 has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:18
*** underyx|off is now known as underyx18:22
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:22
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC18:23
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:26
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:29
*** nsaje_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:34
*** julim_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:36
*** dmsimard_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:40
*** julim has quit IRC18:41
*** dmsimard has quit IRC18:41
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:41
*** nsaje has quit IRC18:41
*** dmsimard_ is now known as dmsimard18:41
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:44
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:49
*** sbfox has quit IRC18:51
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:55
*** sbfox1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:58
*** sbfox has quit IRC18:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:00
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:02
*** renatoar_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:04
*** renatoarmani has quit IRC19:05
*** sbfox1 has quit IRC19:05
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:05
*** ildikov has quit IRC19:08
*** dmsimard has quit IRC19:10
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:10
*** dmsimard_away has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:11
*** dmsimard_away has quit IRC19:11
*** dmsimard_away has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:12
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard19:12
*** mst89 has quit IRC19:15
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:22
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Improve api_paste_config file searching  https://review.openstack.org/9959919:51
*** fnaval has quit IRC19:54
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:57
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:01
*** flwang_ has quit IRC20:01
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC20:04
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:05
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC20:08
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Support for per disk volume measurements  https://review.openstack.org/11103820:20
*** julim_ has quit IRC20:28
*** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:37
*** DrBacchus has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:00
*** rbowen has quit IRC21:04
renatoar_Hi there, anyone know if is possible to transform bandwidth metric in pipeline? I can transform others metrics but when I try to do it with bandwidth (came from l3) doesn't work.21:04
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:09
*** fc___ has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:10
*** fc__ has quit IRC21:12
*** ccrouch has quit IRC21:12
*** sbfox has quit IRC21:12
*** itisit has quit IRC21:12
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC21:12
*** fc___ is now known as fc__21:12
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:13
*** sbfox has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:13
*** changbl has quit IRC21:13
*** ccrouch1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:13
*** itisit has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:13
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:14
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:26
*** renatoar_ has quit IRC21:33
*** thomasem has quit IRC21:42
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:52
*** jaypipes has quit IRC21:53
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:58
*** flwang_ has quit IRC22:02
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:19
*** rwsu has quit IRC22:21
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:22
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away22:22
*** prad has quit IRC22:31
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:36
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:37
*** itisit has left #openstack-ceilometer22:46
*** eglynn has quit IRC22:47
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:48
*** thomasem has quit IRC22:53
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:55
*** thomasem has quit IRC22:55
*** rbak has quit IRC22:58
*** flwang1 has quit IRC23:11
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/11009623:17
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:27
*** terriyu has quit IRC23:31
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:34
*** thomasem has quit IRC23:34
*** gordc has quit IRC23:36
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:46
*** thomasem has quit IRC23:46
*** flwang_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!