Thursday, 2014-05-22

*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:05
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:19
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:20
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC00:26
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:29
*** skelpter has quit IRC00:32
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:34
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:34
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:41
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:43
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:49
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:49
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:50
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:50
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC00:51
*** gordc has quit IRC00:52
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:52
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC00:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer00:59
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:01
*** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:03
*** zul has quit IRC01:03
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:03
*** raymondr has quit IRC01:24
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:31
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC01:35
*** hipster has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:36
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:42
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC01:50
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:53
*** zul has quit IRC01:54
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:56
*** liusheng has quit IRC01:58
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer01:58
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC02:01
*** mengxd has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:07
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:17
*** zul has quit IRC02:22
*** hipster has quit IRC02:25
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC02:25
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:26
*** xdmeng has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:35
*** mengxd has quit IRC02:36
*** mengxd has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:48
*** xdmeng has quit IRC02:50
*** matsuhas_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:55
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:57
*** ilyashakhat_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer02:58
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC02:59
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:03
*** liusheng has quit IRC03:03
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:03
*** sdake has quit IRC03:03
*** ilyashakhat has quit IRC03:03
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:03
*** liusheng has quit IRC03:03
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:04
*** sdake has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:06
*** hipster has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:10
*** fnaval has quit IRC03:11
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:12
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:14
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC03:14
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:14
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC03:14
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:14
*** isviridov has quit IRC03:15
*** boris-42 has quit IRC03:23
*** skelpter has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:24
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:29
*** prad_ has quit IRC03:50
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:52
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC03:52
*** hipster has quit IRC03:55
*** isviridov has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:57
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer03:57
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC04:02
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:22
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:35
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:55
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:58
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer04:59
*** raymondr has quit IRC05:00
*** igor__ has quit IRC05:02
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC05:03
*** isviridov has quit IRC05:05
*** psharma has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:21
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:25
*** raymondr has quit IRC05:29
*** rbowen has quit IRC05:38
*** skelpter has quit IRC05:48
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:51
*** mengxd has quit IRC05:57
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer05:59
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/8850606:01
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:03
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC06:03
*** anand_ts has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:08
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:28
liushengHi Folks, I have found that the commit upload by eglynn about spec git repo has been merged(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94044/). So A new blueprint after registerd should upload a *spec* to review? like nova?06:40
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:42
eglynnliusheng: good morning!06:44
eglynnliusheng: yep, my telemetry-specs repo creation patch finally landed! :) \o/06:44
eglynnliusheng: so the idea is to write a BP based on this template https://github.com/openstack/telemetry-specs/blob/master/specs/template.rst06:45
eglynnliusheng: ... and propose it as a new spec under https://github.com/openstack/telemetry-specs/blob/master/specs/juno06:45
liushengeglynn: good morning, here is afternoon:-)06:45
eglynnliusheng: ... good morning!06:45
eglynnliusheng: ... the commit message for https://review.openstack.org/94044 explain the process very briefly06:46
liushengeglynn: thanks!06:46
liushengeglynn: got it06:46
eglynnliusheng: ... so you'll still need a short BP in launchpad, which points to the spec file in telemetry-specs via the 'Specification URL' field in LP06:48
eglynnliusheng: ... but it's the specs file that'll contain all the detail and is reviewed in gerrit etc.06:48
liushengeglynn: thanks for make thatclear,some days ago (before the desig sommit), I have registerd a blueprint about evluation direct db access, are you remember that? so I can write an specs to review?06:50
eglynnliusheng: yes, if you could propose a corresponding spec file for that BP, that would be great! thanks :)06:51
liushengeglynn: OK, got it! thanks :)06:53
eglynnliusheng: thank *you* sir! :)06:53
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer06:53
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:00
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Remove all mostly untranslated PO files  https://review.openstack.org/9478407:03
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC07:04
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:04
AJaegerI'd like to see some review for https://review.openstack.org/94784, please - this will reduce the daily translation updates significantly07:07
eglynnAJaeger: ... I'll add to my list07:09
eglynnAJaeger: ... SLA == "by end of day" ;)07:09
AJaegereglynn, thanks! I know it didn't pass testing yet ;)07:09
AJaegereglynn, if it merges in before the next run of the bot, it would be great - so in 22 hours07:10
AJaegerif you have questions about it, just ask07:10
eglynnAJaeger: ... I'll definitely get to it before then ... I'll solicit some other reviews also07:12
AJaegereglynn, great, thanks a lot!07:12
AJaegerthis should give far small - and less frequent - updates of the translation bot...07:13
eglynnAJaeger: excellent! ... less churn == goodness07:24
AJaegerYeah, have been working on this across projects - and including updating the infra jobs. This patch is just the final part for ceilometer07:25
eglynnAJaeger: ... cool, you have me convinced, I'll just await the blessings of CI07:28
AJaegersure ;)07:28
*** eglynn has quit IRC07:45
*** isviridov has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:45
*** nacim has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:50
*** shardy has joined #openstack-ceilometer07:56
*** safchain has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:14
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:18
*** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:19
eglynnq/uery jpich08:27
psharmahi , i am getting http://fpaste.org/104051/00747483/ while i was trying to do install ceilometer from github source08:32
psharmaon f19  VM08:32
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:33
*** pnascimento has quit IRC08:37
*** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer08:48
eglynnpsharma: none of the distros I'm aware of are still testing against Fedora1908:49
eglynnpsharma: ... why not move up to f20?08:49
eglynnpsharma: (... as opposed to burning time debugging an issue on a Fedora version that's gonna be EoL'd soon enough)08:49
eglynnpsharma: ... well actually not *that* soon now that I've checked the release schedule, one month after the f21 release http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule08:50
psharmaeglynn, it seems i should resort to f20, however i was opinion building from source wont make much difference of f19/2008:52
psharmaok let me try that08:52
eglynnpsharma: ... for convenience, you could give the RDO RPMs a whirl on f2008:52
eglynnpsharma: ... http://openstack.redhat.com/Quickstart08:52
eglynnpsharma: ... unless you're set on building from master08:53
psharmaeglynn, yes i was trying to setup from master, one more query , for swift ceilometer-middleware do i need all  of ceilometer packages on swift node08:55
jd__eglynn: looks like the spec repo has been created08:56
eglynnpsharma: I suspect the openstack-ceilometer-common RPM would suffice, but I haven't tested that08:56
eglynnjd__: \o/, coolness! :)08:57
eglynnjd__: so nagging infra works ... kinda08:57
jd__eglynn: so should I start my bp in it?08:57
* jd__ just cloned it08:57
eglynnjd__: that would be great if you could08:57
jd__I can do anything08:58
jd__which is something that is not always helping actually, but meh08:58
jd__omg why is there setup.py in this repo08:58
eglynnjd__: it's a clone of the tripleo-specs repo08:58
jd__so it's actually a Python package, haha funny08:58
eglynnjd__: ... which I believe was created by the openstack-cookiecutter tool08:59
jd__"did you deploy Ceilometer?" - "just the specs" - "great, that should be enough for our customers"08:59
eglynnjd__: LOL :)08:59
eglynnjd__: ... so yeah, there's prolly some pruning we could do there09:00
jd__Specs-as-a-Service09:00
jd__describe your software and then it runs09:00
jd__well that's some sort of PaaS I guess09:00
cdentisn't that heat? ;)09:00
* eglynn just took the lazy man's route with a global s/tripleo/telemetry/09:01
eglynn... knowing the tripleo folks, it prolly has a bunch of bash hidden away somewhere also ;)09:01
eglynnjd__: ... feel free to hack out any of the extra baggage you reckon is unnecessary weight09:02
jd__:-)09:02
jd__not a big deal anyway09:02
psharmaeglynn, thanks09:03
anand_tshi all, how cpu utilization of an instance is calculated.? Pls find the paste bin here for the command and output. http://paste.openstack.org/show/81127/ . could someone guide me how to check the utilization of individual resource09:18
anand_tswhat is volume in that output?09:21
eglynnanand_ts: good morning!09:24
eglynnanand_ts: ... so we need to distinguish carefully between the cpu meter (cumulative CPU time in nanos) and the cpu_util (gauge CPU utilization %)09:25
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC09:27
eglynnanand_ts: ... so your paste concerns the former meter09:27
eglynnanand_ts: ... this is just populated by the cumulative CPU time reported by the hypervisor layer (e.g. libvirt)09:28
eglynnanand_ts: ... whereas the cpu_util is derived by computing the delta between subsequent cumulative values, scaled for the number of vcpus allocated to the instance09:30
eglynnanand_ts: ... all done in a transformer in a pipeline09:31
eglynnanand_ts: make sense?09:33
anand_tseglynn, thanks for the reply. very good morning to you too :)09:33
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:33
eglynnanand_ts: np!09:34
anand_tsActually. I'm not sure till now, when I give ceilometer meter-list --query project=PROJECT_ID_Y;user=USER_ID_B, I get output like this  http://paste.openstack.org/show/81130/09:35
anand_tshere I can see guage, cumulative, ns delta etc09:35
anand_tsthis is little confusing eglynn09:36
DinaBelovao/09:37
anand_tsAs you told, I want the cpu utilization of each instance in %.09:37
DinaBelovahello, folks!09:37
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, hey09:37
eglynnanand_ts: not sure I understand your question ... are you seeing more or fewer meters in that output than you'd expect?09:37
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, /me looking on your CR09:37
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: hey09:37
DinaBelovaFinally woke up after jet lag))09:37
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: I hear ya!09:38
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... the patch that landed already?09:38
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, oh, it's already merged :)09:38
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, yup, big lag09:38
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... yep, I guilted the other infra guys into looking at it last night09:38
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... but thanks for looking again!09:38
DinaBelovacoolio)09:38
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, np :)09:38
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, is it working ok for you or you're not started using it yet?09:39
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... I haven't proposed any specs yet, but will be doing so later on today09:39
anand_tseglynn, I see more meters and its difficult to distinguish.How can I get the cpu_util of instances in human readable format. ie, in percentage for eg.09:40
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... but looks fine so far, even if we probably included some needless baggage in the seed repo09:40
jd__eglynn: do you know if I need to create a LP blueprint too? the template in the repo talks about putting the URL, but I don't understand if it's mandatory or not09:40
eglynnjd__: yep create a LP BP also and link via the specification URL09:40
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, ok09:40
jd__link what?09:41
eglynnjd__: ... the LP BP can be delayed I guess until after the spec lands09:41
jd__ack09:41
eglynnjd__: link to  http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/telemetry-specs/tree/specs/juno/jds-awesome-idea.rst09:41
eglynnDinaBelova: welcome back!09:42
DinaBelovaeglynn, heh, I still try to recover from the lagging)))09:42
DinaBelovajd__, o/09:42
jd__ok eglynn09:42
jd__hey DinaBelova09:42
eglynnDinaBelova: ... only 5 hours delta for us, but I still was jet lagged09:43
* eglynn must be getting old ...09:43
DinaBelovaDon't think so - I guess it's simply difficult :(09:43
DinaBelovaage means not much here imho09:43
*** Naren has joined #openstack-ceilometer09:43
eglynnanand_ts: so you're displaying meters there, not samples09:43
Narenhi09:44
eglynnanand_ts: for cpu_util samples ...09:44
DinaBelovajd__ - have you done some initiatives in the Gnocchi since summit?09:44
DinaBelovaI'm a little out of context09:44
DinaBelovabecause of looong trip home09:44
eglynnanand_ts: $ ceilometer sample-list -m cpu_util --query "project=c2956b68bf324c87a1b0090263b350fc;user=3cb6feda450c4d7a9fbdd1c77cdced48"09:44
* jd__ has been jet lagged for 3 days too…09:44
jd__DinaBelova: yeah I've pushed moar code09:44
eglynnanand_ts: ... or for aggregated statistics09:44
anand_tseglynn, thanks I will make a try09:44
eglynnanand_ts: $ ceilometer statistics -m cpu_util --query "project=c2956b68bf324c87a1b0090263b350fc;user=3cb6feda450c4d7a9fbdd1c77cdced48" -p 360009:45
DinaBelovajd__, ok, will start looking on it today09:45
Nareni'm new to here, want to contribute on ceilometer code09:45
eglynnanand_ts: ... ^^^ in that example: -p 3600 = hourly periods09:45
jd__DinaBelova: I've a todo list if you are bored09:45
eglynnNaren: hi, welcome09:45
DinaBelovajd__ I still have vacation - till the end of this week to recover from lagging - but will look on it with great pleasure))09:45
Narenhi eglynn09:45
DinaBelovaand start work on it too)09:45
jd__DinaBelova: ok :)09:45
DinaBelovajd__ so the link to the todo list will be cool ;)09:46
eglynnNaren: my advice ... start by playing around with a devstack, read the docco, and step thru the code09:46
eglynnNaren: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/install/development.html for details of enabling ceilo in devstack09:47
Narenthanks eglynn09:47
Narenfinished devstack playaround09:47
jd__DinaBelova: https://gist.github.com/jd/229ab8211aa9a6b547de I'll try to update it as far as I progress09:48
DinaBelovajd__, cool!09:48
anand_tseglynn. just now I got the question on rdo forums which I asked few months back and your reply too, that cleared. http://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/847/check-vm-cpu-utilization-and-memory-using-ceilometer/p109:50
jd__DinaBelova: but ping me before you start working on anything just to be sure :)09:50
DinaBelovajd__ - sure))09:50
DinaBelovaI simply want now to go through Gnocchi code09:50
DinaBelovaas I have some doubts in several moments09:51
DinaBelovaalthough I love overall idea09:51
DinaBelovajd__, I mean Gnocchi needs to be as simple and changable as it's possible, but in the same time (as swift impl is the first to start with) I have several problems with understanding how to operate with swift correctly - it's still working much better and faster with big objects09:52
DinaBelovaand our info to store there is small really09:53
DinaBelovaI wonder how good this might work finally09:53
jd__DinaBelova: if you want to run some benchmarks, go ahead09:53
jd__it should be pretty doable09:53
DinaBelovajd__ - well, probably, yes... I mean swift is a good project - but its object storage might be not so usable here.09:54
DinaBelovawell, we'll see anyway09:54
DinaBelovaas it'll be pluggable - one more backend may simply solve this problem09:55
jd__Early optimization is the root of all evil.09:55
DinaBelovajd__ heh)) well, I'm not speaking about early optimization) I just say, that probably some of the plugins (to be implemented) will work definitely better and quicker than swift09:56
DinaBelovaso the idea is to keep Gnocchi code pluggable - all other things will go with it09:56
DinaBelova:)09:56
jd__that's why there's a driver system indeed09:57
DinaBelovaindeed ;)09:57
jd__but stating that "swift is not fast enough" sounds really awkward to me09:58
DinaBelovanah, I just say that swift is not optimized to store such small object :-\ I do not say it's bad storage)09:58
jd__hm I don't get why it's not "optimized" for that10:02
jd__I think you should go discuss that on #openstack-swift10:02
jd__but just wait I grab some popcorn first10:02
jd__:D10:02
DinaBelovajd__ - heh)))10:02
DinaBelovayee)10:02
DinaBelovathat's why I say that let's do it - and then just compare10:02
jd__yeah10:03
DinaBelovaI mean I've spoken with SergeyLukjanov as he had some swift experience before10:03
jd__that's not something I'm worried about10:03
DinaBelovajd__ - well - we all want to make this piece of code to work great))) and we'll do it)10:04
eglynnjd__, DinaBelova: slightly off-topic, but what's the initial feeling on InfuxDB as an alternative driver for gnocchi?10:05
eglynn(... i.e. as an alternative to pandas+swift)10:05
DinaBelovaeglynn - well, imho it might be good... but as said on the summit - we need to investigate it better - I mean, idea and how do these folks say about it sounds tasty - but this sounds too good imho)10:06
eglynnDinaBelova: yeah definitely further investigation required10:07
eglynnDinaBelova: ... and it would just be an alternative in the sense one of a pluggable range of drivers10:07
DinaBelovaeglynn, jd__ - personally I believe that hbase might work here good too - as it supports on very low level timestamps inside - so ops with the time data run there much quicker than in other dbs for instance10:07
DinaBelovaeglynn, exactly10:08
eglynnDinaBelova: yeah ... so pandas+swift could be considered the "canonical" driver, but with pandas+hbase/cassandra, or Influx as alternatives10:08
DinaBelovaeglynn, +110:08
DinaBelovacassandra sounds tasty too)))10:09
DinaBelova:D10:09
eglynncool :)10:09
SergeyLukjanovpandas sounds nice10:09
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... yeah sounds soft and cuddly ;)10:10
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, there are some nice pandas in Hong Kong and Atlanta zoo10:10
SergeyLukjanovprobably in Paris zoo too :)10:11
DinaBelovaeglynn, SergeyLukjanov - padnas sounds as https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-4qaqkL_o3xI/UpXqu_CoX3I/AAAAAAAAAP4/ZwPmaDY9Y1Q/w411-h618-no/DSC01024.jpg10:11
SergeyLukjanovand bingo - http://www.giantpandazoo.com/panda/history/pandas-in-france10:11
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... a-ha, you've discovered the hidden pattern in the choice of summit venues!10:11
DinaBelovaeglynn - it's panda from hk zoo))10:11
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: ... that's why Dublin & Berlin lost out to Paris, no pandas! ;)10:11
SergeyLukjanoveglynn, heh, summits map - http://www.giantpandazoo.com/panda/panda-zoos10:13
eglynnSergeyLukjanov: \o/ Mexico City for ODS Spring 2015!10:14
DinaBelovaeglynn - so pandas are the hidden secret)10:14
eglynnDinaBelova: if you guys ever want to bring summit to Saratov, you know what must be done ...10:16
eglynnDinaBelova: ... kidnap a panda! ;)10:16
*** Naren has quit IRC10:17
DinaBelovaeglynn - there are only 47 pandas outside China)10:17
DinaBelovaso it might be difficult to do it without being caught)10:18
eglynnDinaBelova: ... ok, so maybe you'll have to fall back to hiring a dude in a panda suit ;)10:18
DinaBelova:D10:18
*** Sam__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:19
*** Sam__ has quit IRC10:21
*** pnascimento has quit IRC10:22
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:23
_nadya_eglynn: hi! are we gonna have smth like summit-summary on today's meeting?10:24
eglynn_nadya_: hi!10:29
eglynn_nadya_: thanks for the dog! :)10:29
_nadya_eglynn: :)10:30
eglynn_nadya_: ... my daughter loves it, she's mad about dogs10:30
eglynn_nadya_: I was thinking of doing a quick summit round-up and then talk more about Juno planning10:33
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-ceilometer10:34
_nadya_eglynn: yep, sounds good. Because I'm a little bit lost. It would be great to have a list of resources-to-follow. E.g. about gnocci :) The main ideas, directions, session etherpads10:35
eglynn_nadya_: ... first stop would be to look at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno/Etherpads#Ceilometer10:36
eglynn_nadya_: ... on gnocchi, I copied most of the notes I took at the pre-track discussion on gnocchi to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-tsdaas10:37
eglynn_nadya_: ... embedded links to the wiki and git repo10:37
_nadya_eglynn: thanks, great10:38
eglynn_nadya_: ... re. the discussion above on gnocchi+influx, that arose from a suggestion in the room at one of the sessions10:38
eglynn_nadya_: (... from Rob Basham, one of gordc's colleagues)10:39
eglynn_nadya_: there's a decent intro here http://vimeo.com/9531187710:39
eglynn_nadya_: ... also I'll forward you a mail thread of follow-up discussion with Paul Dix, contains some further random detail10:40
_nadya_eglynn: thanks, I'll try to prepare questions before the meeting10:43
eglynn_nadya_: ... cool!10:43
*** denis_makogon has left #openstack-ceilometer10:50
*** fnaval has quit IRC11:00
*** zul has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:18
openstackgerritDina Belova proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Use None instead of mutables in method params defaults  https://review.openstack.org/9104611:22
*** matsuhas_ has quit IRC11:27
*** prad has quit IRC11:28
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:34
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC11:36
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:42
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:43
*** fnaval has quit IRC11:43
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC11:47
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:47
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitreview  https://review.openstack.org/9483211:51
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Clear whitespaces and fix typos  https://review.openstack.org/9483311:52
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483411:52
jd__eglynn: ^11:52
jd__first shot at it11:52
eglynnjd__: thank you sir! ... looking now11:52
jd__eglynn: so is the procedure on that repo the same as usual, ceilometer-core gives 2 +2 to have the bp merged?11:55
eglynnjd__: yes, I would think so11:55
eglynnjd__: ... a single approval would kinda defeat the purpose slightly11:56
jd__would you!11:56
jd__that was more or less the case with the old system where PTL was expected to approve things11:56
eglynnjd__: yeah, but my understanding of the *-specs notion was to make it more collaborative across the core team11:57
jd__sure, I'm not saying the old system was better11:58
jd__I'm just asking11:58
*** erecio has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:58
eglynnjd__: sure, understood :)11:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer11:58
eglynnjd__: ... so I think we should start off needing the same approvals (2 core +2s) for specs and code11:59
eglynnjd__: ... are you concerned about being blocked on stalled reviews of specs?12:00
eglynnjd__: ... that would be a valid concerm12:00
jd__no12:00
eglynnk12:00
jd__not personally at least12:00
jd__OTOH I think that if specs are blocked because not reviewed or debated, it may be a good way of knowing you should not spend time writing code12:01
eglynnjd__: ... that's a good point12:01
jd__but I'm also worried about too much nit-picking on the specs side12:01
jd__we'll see!12:01
eglynnjd__: ... yeah, I think we need to have certain culture of specs reviews12:01
* jd__ nods12:01
eglynnjd__: ... that looks different to the culture of say governance reviews12:02
eglynnjd__: ... i.e. where nitpicking and bikesheding rule ;)12:02
jd__hehe12:02
eglynnjd__: ... so for example -1'ing on say grammar or spelling should be frowned upon IMHO, unless the result is totally unclear12:03
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:03
eglynnjd__: ... also we'll have to try to avoid the endless-circular-debate trap12:04
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:04
jd__eglynn: yeah at least it shouldn't be a -1, I think it's ok to notice them in case there is  need for a new pathset12:04
jd__*patchset12:04
eglynnjd__: roger that!12:04
jd__I lol at py27 not passing in the telemetry-specs repo12:05
eglynnjd__: I guess we'll just have to suck it and see ... we can readjust the policy if it looks like the specs reviews are getting bogged down12:05
jd__eglynn: yup12:05
jd__SRSLY12:06
jd__No .testr.conf config file12:06
jd__I wonder why we need py27 tox target in this repo12:06
* eglynn neglected to copy over any hidden files from the tripleo repo12:07
eglynn... hence the lack of .gitreview, .testr.conf etc.12:07
jd__oh I see. you're fired.12:07
jd__:D12:07
*** nacim has quit IRC12:07
eglynndarn, we've got a chicken-and-egg situation here12:08
jd__there is real unit tests surprisingly12:08
jd__I'm fixing 'em right now boss12:08
* eglynn screwed up when recreating ceilo-specs as telemetry-specs12:08
jd__lemme do some magic for ya12:08
* jd__ lighten a cigar12:08
eglynnjd__: ... how to land the fixes?12:09
eglynnjd__: LOL :)12:09
DinaBelovajd__ - may you please fix some more typos there when you'll conquer these Jenkins fails? :)12:12
DinaBelovai've published some comments there12:12
jd__k12:12
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Clear whitespaces and fix typos  https://review.openstack.org/9483312:13
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitreview  https://review.openstack.org/9483212:13
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483412:13
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Fix tests  https://review.openstack.org/9484012:13
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitignore  https://review.openstack.org/9484112:13
*** dhellman_ has quit IRC12:13
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483412:14
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:14
jd__http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/75/1f/4e/751f4e5494dda4c1a0b320b8bb7f5134.jpg12:16
eglynnjd__: LOL :)12:16
* eglynn breaks own policy by fasttracking https://review.openstack.org/9484012:17
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/telemetry-specs: Fix tests  https://review.openstack.org/9484012:17
*** thomasem has quit IRC12:19
DinaBelovaeglynn, this one too)) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9483212:19
DinaBelovaI guess it's obvious too)12:19
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:19
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Clear whitespaces and fix typos  https://review.openstack.org/9483312:19
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483412:19
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitignore  https://review.openstack.org/9484112:19
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitreview  https://review.openstack.org/9483212:22
*** nacim has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:23
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:26
*** murphi has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:26
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:27
*** nosnos has quit IRC12:31
*** dhellman_ has quit IRC12:32
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC12:33
openstackgerritKoert van der Veer proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Use joins instead of subqueries for metadata filtering  https://review.openstack.org/9432512:34
*** gordc has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:34
openstackgerritKoert van der Veer proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Implemented metering for Cinder's snapshots  https://review.openstack.org/9236512:35
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:36
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:37
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:39
ondergetekendeOops... Rebased the wrong one... oh well.12:39
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC12:43
*** pnascimento has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:48
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:49
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:51
*** julim has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:54
*** cdent has quit IRC12:55
*** jdob has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:57
*** chuck__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer12:59
openstackgerritMehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Dedicated-alarm-database specs  https://review.openstack.org/9485713:02
*** raymondr has quit IRC13:07
openstackgerritMehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Dedicated-alarm-database specs  https://review.openstack.org/9485713:09
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483413:09
*** nacim has quit IRC13:11
*** changbl has quit IRC13:11
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483413:12
jd__21 comments, damn13:15
silehteglynn, should I create a spec into the telemetry-specs for old BP ? (/me is thinking about replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications)13:16
eglynnsileht: I don't think it would be required for stuff that's already landed13:16
eglynnsileht: ... especially the oslo-messaging switch-over, given that this was approved and largely implemented over Icehouse13:17
eglynnsileht: ... so I was thinking we'd apply the new process in a non-retrospective way13:18
eglynnsileht: ... seem sane to you?13:18
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:20
*** skelpter has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:21
eglynnjd__: 21 "nice" comments ;)13:22
openstackgerritMehdi Abaakouk proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Dedicated-alarm-database specs  https://review.openstack.org/9485713:22
eglynnjd__: ... if you smell bikeshedding on my part, feel free to take off your shoe and beat me about the head with it ;)13:22
silehteglynn, replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications is a separate blueprint and the code is not merged yet13:23
silehteglynn, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications13:23
eglynnsileht: my apologies ... /me conflated that with the original olso-messaging switch13:23
eglynnsileht: ... so that one's an edge-case, already and partially implemented13:24
eglynnsileht: ... do you think it would benefit from a detailed spec?13:25
silehteglynn, not really13:25
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:25
eglynnsileht: ... in that case, I'm sure your time could be better spent elsewhere :)13:26
silehtcool :)13:26
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483413:28
jd__eglynn: no it's cool, just updated13:28
jd__eglynn: is there any plan to create/update the LP blueprint automatically from the git repo? /me lazy13:28
eglynnjd__: cool, thanks! ... I'll give it another pass straight way13:28
eglynnjd__: ttx was talking about using the priority field in the LP BP to drive some auto-tracking logic13:29
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:30
* eglynn re-reads IRC backlog to check13:30
*** cdent has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:31
eglynnjd__: ok checked, so ttx was proposing that the filing of the LP BP is normally gated by the PTL13:33
eglynnjd__: ... and only done when the corresponding spec is approved13:33
jd__i want automation13:33
jd__I don't want to click in LP anymore13:33
eglynnjd__: ... does the PTL manually filing the LP BP count as automation from your PoV? ;)13:34
eglynnjd__: ... for the gnocchi stuff, its kind of a special case, as we're definitely gonna do it13:34
jd__lol13:35
jd__are we turning PTL into blue collars?13:35
eglynnjd__: yeah ... I'm gonna love becoming a drone ;)13:36
eglynnjd__: ... for random drive-by BPs, the LP BP would only be filed (by the PTL) if and when the corresponding spec is approved13:36
*** skelpter has quit IRC13:36
jd__eglynn: which is exactly what could be automated, no?13:36
eglynnjd__: ... yep, I guess so13:36
jd__that's just my wish :D13:37
* eglynn is unfamiliar with the LP REST API, but it does exist13:37
eglynnjd__: its a good idea!13:37
jd__I'm sure ttx would know how to do that13:37
eglynnjd__: agreed, I'll raise it with him next week in 1:113:37
jd__it's easy to trigger a post merge that just takes specs/foobar.rst and create/update ceilomter/+blueprint/foobar.rst and that's it13:37
*** r-daneel has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:38
jd__one just have to whisper to ttx's hear13:38
jd__s/have/has/13:38
* eglynn needs to learn the gentle art of ear-whispering ;)13:40
eglynnjd__: but yep, totally agreed in principal13:41
*** nacim has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:42
*** anand_ts has quit IRC13:43
*** promulo has quit IRC13:45
*** amalagon__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:47
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:50
*** amalagon____ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:50
*** amalagon__ has quit IRC13:52
*** cdent_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:53
*** cdent has quit IRC13:55
*** cdent_ is now known as cdent13:55
*** amalagon____ has quit IRC13:55
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:56
*** pnascimento has quit IRC13:56
*** prad has joined #openstack-ceilometer13:58
*** psharma has quit IRC14:02
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:05
zhikunliugordc: ping14:08
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC14:09
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/pycadf: remove token from notifier middleware  https://review.openstack.org/9487814:12
gordczhikunliu: whatsup?14:13
zhikunliugordc:  thanks for your patch in https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1321080.  I have a question. Do we need other patches in ceilometer? Since I didn't see the fix in ceilometer's code.14:13
gordczhikunliu: i'm not sure we do. Ceilometer just collects meter...14:14
gordczhikunliu: we could create a cleanup script but tbh i don't think it's worth it since not many people are using the middleware and token expire anyways.14:15
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:16
*** amalagon has quit IRC14:19
zhikunliugordc: Maybe my understanding is wrong.  so api meters/http.request will not return auth_token after the patch get into oslo and pycadf, right?14:19
openstackgerritIlya Tyaptin proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Improve performance of api requests with hbase scan  https://review.openstack.org/9357614:20
gordcright.14:20
zhikunliugordc: great job. thank you very much!14:22
gordczhikunliu: thanks for pointing out bug.14:23
zhikunliugordc: It's my pleasure :)14:24
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/pycadf: sync oslo  https://review.openstack.org/9488314:29
*** amalagon_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:29
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: refactor sql backend to improve write speed  https://review.openstack.org/9448314:38
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:43
*** raymondr_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer14:59
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:03
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:07
*** igor has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:07
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Use joins instead of subqueries for metadata filtering  https://review.openstack.org/9432515:08
*** nealph has quit IRC15:10
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Remove all mostly untranslated PO files  https://review.openstack.org/9478415:10
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:11
*** igor has quit IRC15:12
*** terriyu has quit IRC15:12
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:12
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:16
*** nealph has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:25
*** packet has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:27
*** raymondr_ has quit IRC15:27
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:28
*** chuck__ has quit IRC15:32
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:32
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:34
*** cmart has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:34
*** deklan is now known as ddieterly15:35
*** rbak has quit IRC15:36
*** rbak has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:36
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:38
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:40
*** terriyu has quit IRC15:42
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:43
*** igor__ has quit IRC15:44
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC15:45
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483415:46
*** raymondr has quit IRC15:47
*** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:49
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: refactor sql backend to improve write speed  https://review.openstack.org/9448315:52
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer15:56
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:00
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC16:01
gordc_nadya_: i have this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94682/ but it won't work with current code.16:03
silehtgordc, I have planned to review and test  the patch tomorrow16:03
_nadya_gordc: I need to go now, will continue tomorrow, ok?16:03
*** amalagon_ has quit IRC16:03
*** llu-laptop has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:03
gordc_nadya_: works for me.16:03
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:03
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:03
_nadya_gordc: ok :)16:03
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:03
gordcsileht: awesome. thanks. let me know if you have any concerns.16:03
silehtgordc, good jobs, no more annoying relationships between tables16:03
*** fabio_g has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:04
*** murphi is now known as ildikov16:04
gordcsileht: agreed. :)16:04
*** fnaval has quit IRC16:04
*** llu-laptop has quit IRC16:06
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:07
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:08
*** Ruetobas has quit IRC16:08
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC16:10
*** cmart has quit IRC16:11
*** Ruetobas has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:13
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:14
dhellmanneglynn, gordc: have a sec to talk about pycadf?16:27
eglynndhellmann: sure16:27
dhellmanneglynn: I'm reading the meeting logs for the meetings I missed this week, and I noticed you said in the project meeting that the telemetry-specs repo would have specs for pycadf16:28
dhellmannI understood that to be an oslo lib. It doesn't matter, and I'm happy to have telemetry take over managing it, but we need to make that official if you want to do it.16:28
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC16:28
eglynndhellmann: well just meant that pycadf was part of the telemetry program16:29
eglynndhellmann: ... am I wrong on that?16:29
dhellmanneglynn: right, that's what I meant: officially, it's part of the oslo program16:29
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:29
eglynndhellmann: ... a-ha, apologies, I was reading from the infra config I think16:29
dhellmannhttp://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml#n15616:29
dhellmannI think we put it there because "it's a library" :-)16:30
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:30
eglynndhellmann: I think the infra-config have diverged from governance16:30
eglynndhellmann: one sec til I dig16:30
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:30
dhellmannyeah, that's likely16:30
dhellmanneglynn: like I said, it's not a big deal to me who manages it, I just don't want any confusion for contributors on where to put the specs.16:32
dhellmanneglynn: it makes quite a bit of sense for telemetry to own it, if the team wants to, and it's a simple enough change to make16:33
eglynndhellmann: well it's absolutely fine in oslo, I just thought I had read in infra-config that it was under the ceilo umbrella16:33
dhellmannalthough we will have several oslo libs depending on it, iirc16:33
*** fnaval has quit IRC16:33
eglynndhellmann: ... but maybe I dreamt that up16:33
dhellmanneglynn: ok, just making clear that I'm not annoyed :-)16:33
eglynndhellmann: cool :)16:33
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:35
eglynndhellmann: nope I can't find the reference I thought I saw in infra-config, so I stand corrected on that!16:35
dhellmanneglynn: modules/gerritbot/files/gerritbot_channel_config.yaml lists openstack/pycadf under projects for openstack-ceilometer16:37
dhellmannbut that's just a bot config16:37
eglynndhellmann: a-ha, that must have been it ... phew not going senile, yet! :)16:37
dhellmanntell me how you feel about that at the end of this release cycle. ;-)16:38
*** nacim has quit IRC16:39
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:39
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:40
openstackgerritJulien Danjou proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Gnocchi specs  https://review.openstack.org/9483416:42
*** igor__ has quit IRC16:45
*** ildikov has quit IRC16:46
*** safchain has quit IRC16:48
*** shardy is now known as shardy_afk16:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:50
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-ceilometer16:57
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:01
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:04
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:05
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:06
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:07
*** ityaptin has quit IRC17:14
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:26
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:30
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:30
*** raymondr has quit IRC17:38
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:39
gordcdhellmann: eglynn: sorry about that stepped out for lunch. i probably missed items on pycadf... but i agree it's fine to leave in oslo for now.17:41
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:42
eglynngordc: yeap, the confusion was caused by me misinterpreting the gerrit bot config in the infra repo17:42
gordceglynn: yeah, i guess we can switch that to oslo since they have their own channel now?17:43
eglynngordc: sure if that works17:43
gordceglynn: ok. i'll look to do that later.17:44
*** changbl has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:46
eglynngordc: cool, though I wouldn't say it's high priority one way or the other17:46
*** igor_ has quit IRC17:46
* eglynn just jumped to the wrong conclusion when he read https://github.com/openstack-infra/config/blob/master/modules/gerritbot/files/gerritbot_channel_config.yaml#L8717:46
gordceglynn: agreed. later == sometime in next few months. :)17:47
eglynngordc: LOL :) ... Mañana17:48
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:51
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:52
*** raymondr has quit IRC17:55
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer17:56
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC17:57
openstackgerritKoert van der Veer proposed a change to openstack/ceilometer: Implemented metering for Cinder's snapshots  https://review.openstack.org/9236517:57
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Spec for metering LBaas  https://review.openstack.org/9495817:59
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:00
*** raymondr has quit IRC18:00
*** cdent has quit IRC18:01
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:04
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:04
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:04
*** erecio has quit IRC18:06
*** fabio_g has quit IRC18:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:10
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:17
*** amalagon has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:30
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC18:38
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:39
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC18:40
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:40
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:41
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:42
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:42
openstackgerritPradeep Kilambi proposed a change to openstack/telemetry-specs: Spec for metering LBaas  https://review.openstack.org/9495818:47
*** igor_ has quit IRC18:47
openstackgerritgordon chung proposed a change to openstack/pycadf: sync oslo  https://review.openstack.org/9488318:53
*** cmart has joined #openstack-ceilometer18:56
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:00
*** raymondr has quit IRC19:04
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:04
*** scroiset has quit IRC19:07
*** raymondr_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:08
*** scroiset has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:08
*** raymondr has quit IRC19:09
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:10
*** shakayumi has quit IRC19:10
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:10
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:20
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/telemetry-specs: Add .gitignore  https://review.openstack.org/9484119:25
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC19:27
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/telemetry-specs: Clear whitespaces and fix typos  https://review.openstack.org/9483319:27
*** raymondr_ has quit IRC19:29
*** gordc has left #openstack-ceilometer19:29
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:32
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/pycadf: remove token from notifier middleware  https://review.openstack.org/9487819:34
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:39
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:43
*** thomasem_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:43
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:43
*** thomasem has quit IRC19:44
*** amalagon_____ has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:45
*** amalagon has quit IRC19:46
*** amalagon_____ is now known as amalagon19:46
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:47
*** igor_ has quit IRC19:47
*** raymondr has quit IRC19:48
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-ceilometer19:52
lcostantinohi19:52
lcostantinodo you guys think it would be acceptable to have a central pollster plugin that monitor nova compute services an if it's down produce a sample, so an alarm can be triggered?20:04
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:05
*** raymondr has quit IRC20:07
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:11
*** skelpter has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:20
*** raymondr has quit IRC20:20
*** yjiang5_away is now known as yjiang520:21
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:21
*** raymondr has quit IRC20:25
*** therve has quit IRC20:25
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:25
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:26
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:27
*** raymondr has quit IRC20:27
*** amalagon has left #openstack-ceilometer20:28
*** raymondr has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:28
*** cmart has quit IRC20:29
*** igor_ has quit IRC20:30
*** igor__ has quit IRC20:32
*** raymondr has quit IRC20:33
*** therve has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:35
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/ceilometer: Check if samples returned by get_sample_data are not None  https://review.openstack.org/8599920:43
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:47
*** fnaval has quit IRC20:48
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:48
*** joesavak has quit IRC20:52
*** fnaval has quit IRC20:53
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:58
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-ceilometer20:59
*** jdob has quit IRC21:03
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:06
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:09
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:17
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:28
*** lakspace has quit IRC21:31
*** igor_ has quit IRC21:32
*** raymondr_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:35
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:40
*** lcostantino has quit IRC21:47
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC21:51
*** skelpter has quit IRC21:54
*** skelpter has joined #openstack-ceilometer21:54
*** promulo has quit IRC22:02
*** boris-42 has quit IRC22:17
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:21
*** joesavak has quit IRC22:24
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:25
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:25
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:28
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:32
*** changbl has quit IRC22:33
*** igor_ has quit IRC22:33
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:49
*** amalagon has joined #openstack-ceilometer22:50
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:57
*** rbak has quit IRC22:58
*** raymondr_ has quit IRC22:59
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC23:19
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:20
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:23
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:29
*** skelpter has quit IRC23:34
*** igor_ has quit IRC23:34
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:41
*** thomasem_ has quit IRC23:42
*** shakayumi has quit IRC23:50
*** r-daneel has quit IRC23:50
*** promulo has joined #openstack-ceilometer23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!