Friday, 2014-09-19

*** atiwari has quit IRC00:02
*** SheenaG11 has joined #openstack-barbican00:20
*** SheenaG1 has quit IRC00:20
*** ayoung-DadMode has quit IRC00:25
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:48
*** akoneru is now known as akoneru_afk01:13
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican01:15
*** akoneru_afk has quit IRC01:17
*** alee_karate has quit IRC02:04
*** alee has joined #openstack-barbican02:10
*** woodster_ has quit IRC02:25
*** bubbva_ has quit IRC02:35
*** bubbva_ has joined #openstack-barbican02:36
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck03:11
*** himhiker has joined #openstack-barbican03:20
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck03:21
*** gyee has quit IRC03:25
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck03:31
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck03:41
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck03:53
*** himhiker has quit IRC04:32
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck04:43
*** juantwo has quit IRC04:51
*** nkinder has quit IRC04:52
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:53
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-barbican04:53
*** akoneru_afk has joined #openstack-barbican07:11
*** akoneru_afk has quit IRC07:35
openstackgerritAbhishek Koneru proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Add asymmetric key generation in dogtag plugin
openstackgerritTim Kelsey proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Adding a plugin to interact with HP Atalla ESKM
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican11:56
*** himhiker has joined #openstack-barbican12:08
*** SheenaG11 has quit IRC12:30
*** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican12:40
*** lisaclark has left #openstack-barbican12:49
*** himhiker has quit IRC13:01
*** himhiker has joined #openstack-barbican13:02
*** nkinder has quit IRC13:15
*** lisaclark has joined #openstack-barbican13:26
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-barbican13:31
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/barbican: Adding sub-status and message to orders
*** ametts has joined #openstack-barbican13:54
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-barbican14:00
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:02
*** usimba has joined #openstack-barbican14:03
*** himhiker has quit IRC14:10
*** ayoung has quit IRC14:10
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican14:16
*** paul_glass has joined #openstack-barbican14:35
*** paul_glass1 has joined #openstack-barbican14:37
*** paul_glass has quit IRC14:40
*** codekobe____ has joined #openstack-barbican14:47
*** codekobe___ has quit IRC14:48
*** ayoung has quit IRC14:48
*** dougwig has quit IRC14:48
*** codekobe____ is now known as codekobe___14:48
*** dougwig__ has joined #openstack-barbican14:49
*** bubbva_ has quit IRC14:51
*** jorge_munoz has joined #openstack-barbican14:54
*** bubbva_ has joined #openstack-barbican14:57
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican14:58
*** juantwo_ has joined #openstack-barbican14:59
*** nkinder_ has joined #openstack-barbican15:03
*** juantwo has quit IRC15:05
*** nkinder has quit IRC15:05
jvrbanacwoodster_, ping?15:10
chellygelno ping for you15:11
* jvrbanac walks away sad15:12
reaperhulkbaaaah, having all my stuff in storage is burning me today15:13
reaperhulkDon't seem to have any spare power cables15:13
reaperhulkI have like 50 in storage.15:13
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican15:15
jvrbanacreaperhulk, field trip!15:15
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck15:16
reaperhulkWell as soon as this other computer is done downloading some software I can pull the plug on it and use that cable15:17
rm_workreaperhulk: lol, yeah I hate that15:19
rm_workknowing you have exactly the cable you need but it's just not quite available or you can't find it15:19
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck15:21
openstackgerritConstanze Kratel proposed a change to openstack/barbican: removed tenant id from code samples
openstackgerritConstanze Kratel proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Removed cd-devguide.wadl as it was added by mistake
*** arunkant has quit IRC15:31
*** dstufft has quit IRC15:31
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:31
*** dstanek has quit IRC15:31
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC15:32
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-barbican15:32
*** arunkant has joined #openstack-barbican15:32
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-barbican15:34
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-barbican15:35
*** d0ugal is now known as Guest5064815:35
*** dstufft has joined #openstack-barbican15:35
*** dstanek has quit IRC15:46
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-barbican15:46
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/barbican: removed image files as they referred to internal architecure
*** dougwig__ is now known as dougwig16:27
*** Guest50648 is now known as d0ugal16:29
*** d0ugal has quit IRC16:30
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-barbican16:30
*** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican16:37
*** gyee has quit IRC16:48
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-lunch16:49
*** ayoung-lunch has quit IRC16:54
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican17:00
*** akoneru has joined #openstack-barbican17:02
*** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican17:17
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican17:18
*** gyee has quit IRC17:24
LarsNHi all,  A few weeks ago I stumbled across a blog post that talked a little bit about the abysmal state of Linux keys management, and that post referenced Barbican.  I'm just starting to look at the software and am wondering where the best source for documentation is currently?17:59
LarsNis it as simple as reading the Github, and then a lot of source code?  or is there an official source of truth I should be referencing?17:59
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:01
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican18:02
aleewoodster_, jvrbanac , redrobot - can we start getting some eyes on please?  If we want to try and get it in next week, we need to get the review cycle started.18:05
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-afk18:43
*** ayoung-afk is now known as ayoung18:45
openstackgerritRafael Rivero proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Typos 'asychronous' and 'formated'
*** ayoung has quit IRC18:53
*** akoneru has quit IRC19:09
redrobotHi LarsN!  The github wiki at has the most up-to-date information19:25
redrobotLarsN there's some stuff we've been working during the current release cycle that has yet to be documented though19:26
LarsNredrobot: thanks! :)19:56
redrobotLarsN you're welcome!  If you have any questions don't hesitate to come back here and ask.19:56
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-barbican20:02
*** alee has quit IRC20:10
*** alee has joined #openstack-barbican20:10
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit will be offline from 20:30 to 20:50 UTC for project renames20:13
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Gerrit will be offline from 20:30 to 20:50 UTC for project renames"20:13
*** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican20:15
openstackgerritJohn Vrbanac proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Switch to use testr
*** usimba has quit IRC20:35
*** ayoung is now known as MadamImAdam20:35
*** dstanek is now known as kenatsd20:37
rm_workredrobot: heya buddy, hows it goin?20:43
* redrobot hides20:43
* rm_work is definitely not stalking redrobot 20:44
rm_workredrobot: tell me what you want me to do to get this patch +2'd20:45
redrobotrm_work get someone else to +2 first. :-P20:45
rm_workredrobot: i'm going to do one more patch and model the methods after Cinder's client20:46
rm_workredrobot: sound good to you?20:46
redrobotrm_work I'm still debating on wether we want to client.containers.get() like every other client or just go ahead and client.container.containers()20:46
rm_workI was going to change it to get()20:46
rm_workand create()20:46
redrobotwhat are you thinking for picking a sub-type in create()20:47
rm_workfor get() I was going to use "expected_type" but otherwise not type-check20:47
rm_workfor create(), I was actually technically going to do create_rsa() create_certificate() create()20:47
redrobotexpected_type=Container (the class object?)20:48
rm_workI know you objected to create_generic()20:48
rm_workredrobot: that's how it works now20:48
rm_workand I have to use type()20:48
* rm_work grumbles20:48
redrobotI'd be ok without expected_type20:49
rm_workalso, looks like I'm not on the final Paris list anymore :(20:49
rm_workredrobot: well, I was going to remove container_ref from the create_*() methods20:49
redrobotsince .get() doesn't imply any type, I'd be ok with pushing the typechecking to the user20:49
rm_workI guess that is fine with me20:49
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Development & Discussion for the Incubated OpenStack Barbican project ( Channel log is available on eavesdrop ("20:50
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is back online20:50
redrobotso then we don't need expected_type at all?20:50
redrobotwould create Container20:50
rm_workcreate() would create Container20:50
redrobotcreate_rsa_container or create_rsacontainer?20:50
rm_worklooking at Cinder, they don't include the name of the class20:50
redrobotwith you so far20:50
rm_workit's straight up .create()20:51
rm_workis create() still a factory method then?20:52
rm_workall it does is package the call with the included api20:52
openstackgerritDonald Stufft proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Test the secret model using an in memory database
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC20:55
*** paul_glass1 has quit IRC20:55
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican20:56
*** akoneru has joined #openstack-barbican20:57
rm_workredrobot: also, do you care about the names of the consumer registration functions?20:58
rm_workredrobot: i opted to go with: register_consumer() and remove_consumer()20:59
rm_workdunno if that gels...20:59
redrobotseems legit21:01
rm_workredrobot: also, should save() reload the data from Barbican before returning? right now it'll save() and the data the client prints is like, name=None, status=None, etc21:02
rm_work(if the user didn't set a name)21:02
rm_workwhereas if I get() the thing first, it'll return with the real name (uuid) and status (PENDING or whatever)21:03
redrobothmm... would that involve an extra trip to Barbican?21:03
rm_worknot sure if worth it21:03
*** gyee has quit IRC21:03
rm_worki lean towards "no"21:03
redrobothmm... yeah, that's a tough call21:03
rm_worktechnically it's inaccurate21:03
rm_worki could "best guess" fill, by pulling the uuid out of the container_ref (which I do have) and filling the name with that if it's None21:04
rm_workand setting the status to something initial;21:04
rm_worklike PENDING21:04
redrobotI'd say go ahead and do the extra GET, and if anyone complains about the double trip, then we can look into some sort of lazy get on the name?21:06
redrobotI think that's the only field that we auto-populate when missing.21:06
rm_workwell, the issue is that on a create() via the *CLI*, it immediately prints everything out :P21:06
rm_workand like I said, I *could* fill those with the knowledge I have about how barbican names containers...21:06
rm_workbut it's technically possible that could drift if the server changes21:06
redrobotyeah, but then we have to maintain that in two places21:06
redrobotwe're so on the same page today, it's scary21:07
redrobotprobably just b/c it's Friday afternoon :-P21:07
rm_workI mean, I'm really pretty sane21:07
rm_workI promise21:07
rm_workour disagreements over the past week has really been about like... a function name21:08
redrobotis a lazy property on name feasable?  ... I mean, we know if name is None we have to do the extra GET21:08
rm_workwhat about status21:09
redrobotque estatus?21:10
rm_workyou know, the field "status"? that containers have?21:10
rm_workusually comes back as "ACTIVE"?21:10
* redrobot all of a sudden feels like he's out of touch21:10
redrobotoh, I think that's always going to be active.  IIRC only Orders have different statuses21:10
rm_workk so21:11
rm_workshould I just straight up *set it* to active once I save()? :P21:11
redrobothehe... I suppose we could make status lazy as well?21:11
redrobotLAZY ALL THE THINGS!21:11
redrobotI wonder whatever happened to jaosorio21:11
redrobothope he's not in a cold Helsinki jail21:12
rm_workhe did review my other __str__ CR again...21:12
*** jorge_munoz has quit IRC21:16
rm_workalright, submitting21:19
rm_workredrobot: oh right, are those still considered factory methods?21:21
rm_workif not, I need to fix the docstrings :P21:21
rm_workjvrbanac might not think so21:22
rm_workI am not sure anymore21:22
rm_worknow they don't even get/create from the same method, it's literally just an ... Interface?21:22
redrobotjust call it "method" :-P21:23
rm_work"creation method" :P21:24
redrobotI dunno... seems generic enough21:24
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican21:26
*** juantwo_ has quit IRC21:29
*** MadamImAdam is now known as CaptainYoung21:30
*** juantwo has quit IRC21:31
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed a change to openstack/python-barbicanclient: Add Containers to python-barbicanclient
*** CaptainYoung has quit IRC21:38
openstackgerritAdam Harwell proposed a change to openstack/python-barbicanclient: Change object __str__() to use pretty formatting
rm_workalright redrobot. this is the one. +2 plox.21:40
rm_workwoodster_ / jvrbanac / reaperhulk / hockeynut / others ^^21:56
openstackgerritConstanze Kratel proposed a change to openstack/barbican: Removed the cq-devguide.wadl file
*** nkinder_ has quit IRC22:07
*** ametts has quit IRC22:12
*** kenatsd is now known as dstanek22:30
*** woodster_ has quit IRC22:35
*** alee is now known as alee_out22:39
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican23:04
*** juantwo_ has joined #openstack-barbican23:04
*** juantwo has quit IRC23:04
*** juantwo_ has quit IRC23:06
*** juantwo has joined #openstack-barbican23:07

Generated by 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!